Spironolactone blocks glucocorticoid-mediated hearing preservation in autoimmune mice

Cortisol Sensitizes Cochlear Hair Cells to Gentamicin Ototoxicity Via Endogenous Apoptotic Pathway

BACKGROUND

The widespread use of aminoglycosides is a prevalent cause of sensorineural hearing loss. Patients receiving aminoglycosides usually have elevated levels of circulating stress hormones due to disease or physiological stress; however, whether the stress hormone cortisol impacts aminoglycoside-mediated injury of cochlear hair cells has not been fully investigated.

METHODS

House Ear Institute-Organ of Corti 1 (HEI-OC1) cells with or without cortisol pretreatment were exposed to gentamicin, we investigated the effect of cortisol pretreatment on gentamicin ototoxicity by assessing cell viability. Molecular pathogenesis was explored by detecting apoptosis and oxidative stress. Meanwhile, by inhibiting glucocorticoid receptors (GR) and mineralocorticoid receptors (MR), the potential roles of receptor types in cortisol-mediated sensitization were evaluated.

RESULTS

Cortisol concentrations below 75 μmol/l did not affect cell viability. However, pretreatment with 50 μmol/l cortisol for 24 hours sensitized hair cells to gentamicin-induced apoptosis. Further mechanistic studies revealed that cortisol significantly increased hair cell apoptosis and oxidative stress, and altered apoptosis-related protein expressions induced by gentamicin. In addition, blockade of either GR or MR attenuated cortisol-induced hair cell sensitization to gentamicin toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Cortisol pretreatment increased mammalian hair cell susceptibility to gentamicin toxicity. Sensitization was related to the activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and excessive generation of reactive oxygen species. Cortisol may exacerbate aminoglycoside ototoxicity.

Comparison of Intratympanic Steroid and Hyperbaric Oxygen Salvage Therapy Hearing Outcomes in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Systemic steroids are the most common first-line therapy in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), with significant improvement in hearing outcomes in over 60% of patients. It is unknown why 40% of patients do not respond to systemic steroid therapy. Salvage treatment includes intratympanic steroids (ITS) and hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO) therapy, with inconsistent results reported. This study aimed to compare the results of ITS and HBO therapy in patients with SSNHL that previously failed systemic steroid therapy.

DESIGN

This is a comparative retrospective nonrandomized interventional cohort study, enrolling 126 patients with SSNHL. Out of these, 35 patients received HBO therapy, 43 patients received ITS, and 48 patients did not receive any second-line therapy (control group). Pure-tone audiograms were performed before and after the salvage therapy in the IT and HBO groups and at the same time interval in the control group. Study variables included age, time until therapy initiation, tinnitus status, and hearing outcomes, with a cutoff criteria of cumulative >30 dB improvement on all frequencies indicating recovery.

RESULTS

ITS and HBO therapy were associated with statistically significant hearing recovery at all frequencies compared to systemic steroids. The results show an average hearing improvement of 13.6 dB overall frequencies (250 to 8000 Hz) after ITS therapy and 7.4 dB in HBO therapy in comparison to the control group. Presence of significant hearing improvement positively correlated with age, ITS therapy, and HBO therapy. Presence of tinnitus before therapy was negatively correlated with hearing improvement. Patients with tinnitus present at the start of therapy improve 4.67 dB less on average compared to those without tinnitus. ITS therapy significantly reduced tinnitus compared to the other two treatment options. Patients with tinnitus present before therapy significantly improve hearing at low frequencies, compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

ITS and HBO therapy show superior hearing results compared to observation alone after failed oral steroid therapy for SSNHL. ITS shows an additional positive impact on tinnitus reduction and shows superior hearing outcomes after salvage therapy.

Association Between the Number of Intratympanic Steroid Injections and Hearing Recovery in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

The frequency of intratympanic (IT) steroid injection varies from once daily to once weekly or less among studies and does not reach a uniform standard. This study investigated the potential association between the number of IT steroid injections and hearing recovery to determine the optimal number in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients. A retrospective study involving 233 SSNHL patients receiving IT steroids plus batroxobin within 7 days of onset was performed. Patients were followed up for 3 months. More than 15 dB of HL improvement in the pretreatment pure tone average (PTA) was defined as effective. The effective group had a higher IT injection numbers than the ineffective group (≥ 6 times: 84.6 vs. 61.1, p < 0.001). Regardless of the unadjusted model or adjusted model, patients who received more frequent IT steroid injections seemed more likely to recover hearing (unadjusted model, OR, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.06-1.48; p = 0.007; adjusted model, OR, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.01-1.45; p = 0.044). Six IT injections had the highest rate of hearing recovery (79.1%). In conclusion, IT injection number was an independent factor that was positively associated with hearing recovery, and the optimal number of IT steroid injections was 6. Batroxobin plus higher number of IT steroid injections showed more effective for treating SSNHL.

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Effectiveness of salvage treatment with low-dose intratympanic dexamethasone

Objectives

To evaluate hearing outcome of salvage treatment with intratympanic steroids (ITS) in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) refractory to initial systemic steroid (SS) therapy.

Material and methods

A retrospective medical chart review was conducted on 54 consecutive patients with ISSNHL refractory to SS. Salvage treatment with a low dose intratympanic dexamethasone (4 mg/ml) was offered after one week of primary treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients accepted ITS (treatment group) and 29 patients did not undergo additional treatment (control group). A pure tone average (PTA) gain of at least 10 dB was considered hearing improvement.

Results

Hearing improvement rate was higher in ITS group compared to control group (40% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.035). A mean PTA improvement of 8.6 ± 9.8 dB was observed in the ITS group and, whereas the control group had an average hearing gain of 0.7 ± 2 dB (p < 0.001). Audiometric analysis revealed a significant hearing gain in ITS group at all tested frequencies compared to control group (p < 0.05). Analysis of the selected variables, identified intratympanic steroid treatment as the only independent prognostic factor for hearing improvement (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.1-15.7; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Intratympanic low dose dexamethasone is effective in patients with incomplete hearing recovery after primary systemic steroid treatment.

Endolymphatic hydrops induced by different mechanisms responds differentially to spironolactone: a rationale for understanding the diversity of treatment responses in hydropic inner ear disease

Background: The exact pathophysiological mechanism(s) underlying endolymphatic hydrops (EH) remain elusive. We have previously shown that chronic administration of vasopressin and inhibitors of the cAMP/cGMP degrading enzymes (PDE3, PDE4, PDE5) results in the development of EH to mice. Aims/objectives: Evaluate the ability of spironolactone, an aldosterone antagonist, to prevent EH, when induced by different pathways. Material and methods: Mice were treated for 4 weeks with vasopressin, the PDE3 inhibitor cilostamide and the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram in the presence or absence of spironolactone. EH was assessed using high resolution 9.4T MRI. The expression of proteins in human saccule sensory epithelium was studied with immunohistochemistry. Results: Spironolactone prevents EH induced by vasopressin and rolipram, but not hydrops induced by cilostamide. The aldosterone target ENaC and the mineralocorticoid receptor were expressed in the human saccule sensory epithelium. Conclusions: The effect of spironolactone on EH appears to be pathway-dependent and may provide explanations why certain drugs may be effective in some patients with hydropic ear disease while not in others. Significance: Extrapolating this finding to the clinic supports that a personalized medicine approach is probably necessary in the treatment of diseases involving EH, as different pathways may be needed to be targeted for treatment.

Neuroprotective factors and incident hearing impairment in the epidemiology of hearing loss study

OBJECTIVE

Hearing impairment (HI) is common in aging adults. Aldosterone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF1), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been identified as potentially protective of hearing. The present study aims to investigate these relationships.

METHODS

The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study is a longitudinal population-based study of aging in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin, that began in 1993. Baseline for the present investigation is the 1998 to 2000 phase. Follow-up exams occurred approximately every 5 years, with the most recent occurring from 2013 to 2016. Hearing was measured by pure-tone audiometry. HI was defined as a pure tone average (PTA) > 25 decibels hearing level in either ear. Change in PTA was the difference between follow-up examinations and baseline. Baseline serum samples were used to measure biomarkers in 2017. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the effect of biomarker levels in the lowest quintile (Q1) versus the highest (Q5) on incident HI and PTA change.

RESULTS

There were 1,088 participants (69.3% women) at risk of HI included in analyses. The mean baseline age was 63.8 years (standard deviation = 7.0). The 16-year incidence of HI was 54.9% and was higher in men (61.1%) than women (52.1%). In age- and sex-adjusted models, aldosterone (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.82-1.37), IGF1 (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.71-1.19), and BDNF (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.66-1.12) levels were not associated with risk of HI. PTA change was similarly not affected by biomarker levels.

CONCLUSION

Aldosterone, IGF1, and BDNF were not associated with decreased risk of age-related hearing loss in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Laryngoscope, 129:2178-2183, 2019.

Gene expression effects of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor agonists and antagonists on normal human skeletal muscle

Mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid receptors are closely related steroid hormone receptors that regulate gene expression through many of the same hormone response elements. However, their transcriptional activities and effects in skeletal muscles are largely unknown. We recently identified mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in skeletal muscles after finding that combined treatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril and MR antagonist spironolactone was therapeutic in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist prednisolone is the current standard-of-care treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy because it prolongs ambulation, likely due to its anti-inflammatory effects. However, data on whether glucocorticoids have a beneficial or detrimental direct effect on skeletal muscle are controversial. Here, we begin to define the gene expression profiles in normal differentiated human skeletal muscle myotubes treated with MR and GR agonists and antagonists. The MR agonist aldosterone and GR agonist prednisolone had highly overlapping gene expression profiles, supporting the notion that prednisolone acts as both a GR and MR agonist that may have detrimental effects on skeletal muscles. Co-incubations with aldosterone plus either nonspecific or selective MR antagonists, spironolactone or eplerenone, resulted in similar numbers of gene expression changes, suggesting that both drugs can block MR activation to a similar extent. Eplerenone treatment alone decreased a number of important muscle-specific genes. This information may be used to develop biomarkers to monitor clinical efficacy of MR antagonists or GR agonists in muscular dystrophy, develop a temporally coordinated treatment with both drugs, or identify novel therapeutics with more specific downstream targets.

Intratympanic dexamethasone injection vs methylprednisolone for the treatment of refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Background:

During the past years various drugs have been used for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) treatment including steroids that are shown to be beneficial. Directed delivery of high doses of steroids into the inner ear is suggested for its potential and known as intratympanic steroids therapy (IST). Despite the use of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone as the traditional treatments, there are still debates about the optimal dosage, preferred drug, and the route of administration.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a randomized clinical trial study in which 50 patients suffering from SSNHL and resistant to standard therapy were employed. Each patient took 0.5 ml methylprednisolone (40 mg/mg) along with bicarbonate or dexamethasone (4 mg/mL) through direct intratympanic injection. This method was performed and scheduled once every 2 days for three times only for the dexamethasone receiving group. Hearing test was carried out and the results were analyzed according to a four-frequency (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 kHz) pure tone average (PTA) and Siegel's criteria.

Results:

According to Siegel's criteria, three out of 25 (12%) dexamethasone receiving patients were healed in 1 and 4 (16%), 9 (32%) were respectively recovered in Siegel's criteria 2, 3, and 9 (32%) showed no recovery. In the group receiving methylprednisolone, recovery was found in 6 (24%), 8 (32%), 7 (28%) patients in the Siegel's criteria 1, 2, 3, respectively, and in 4 (16%) patients no recovery was recorded. In methylprednisolone group, hearing was significantly improved compared to the dexamethasone group (P < 0.05). The general hearing improvement rate was 84% in methylprednisolone receiving patients showing a significantly higher improvement than 64% in the dexamethasone group.

Conclusions:

Topical intratympanic treatment with methylprednisolone is safe and an effective treatment approach for those SSNHL cases that are refractory to the common therapies by Dexamethasone.

Intratympanic Steroid Treatment in Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Control Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although systemic steroids in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) appears to be the most effective and the most widely accepted treatment today, a significant number of patients do not respond to steroid treatment or they cannot receive steroids for medical reasons. Intratympanic (IT) administration of steroids appears to be an alternative or additional method of management without the side effects of intravenous steroids. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safeness of IT administration of steroids in patients who had not responded to IV treatment and to compare treatment efficacy with controls.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Our study consisted of 37 patients with SSHL who, at the end of 10 days of therapy with intravenous steroids as a 1st line treatment, had pure-tone 4-frequency (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) average (PTA) of worse than 30 dB or worse than 10 dB from the contralateral ear (defined as failed intravenous treatment). They were randomized into 2 groups, treatment and control. The 19 patients of the treatment group received approximately 0.5 mL sterile aqueous suspension of methylprednisolone acetate in a concentration of 80 mg/2 mL by direct injection. The procedure was carried out 4 times within a 15-day period. An audiogram was performed before each injection and approximately 1.5 months after the last session.

RESULTS: All patients tolerated the procedure well. No perforation or infection was noticed in any of the patients at their last visit. With regard to the 19 patients who received intratympanic treatment, in 9 patients, the PTA threshold improved more than 10 db, in 10 patients there was no change greater than 10 db, and no patients deteriorated more than 10 db. In the control group, none of the patients showed any change greater than 10 db. The difference was statistically significant ( P = 0.002). The treatment group showed an improvement in mean PTA of 14.9 dB, whereas the control group showed a deterioration of 0.8 dB, and this difference also was statistically significant ( P = 0.0005). IT treatment ( P = 0.0001), better post-IV PTA ( P = 0.0008), and absence of vertigo ( P = 0.02) were good predictors of the outcome. In contrast, sex, age, affected ear, days to admission, and pattern of the initial audiogram showed no significant influence on the outcome.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: IT steroid administration after failed intravenous steroids is a safe and effective treatment in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Losartan Treatment Protects Retinal Ganglion Cells and Alters Scleral Remodeling in Experimental Glaucoma

Purpose

To determine if oral losartan treatment decreases the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death caused by experimental intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in mice.

Methods

We produced IOP increase in CD1 mice and performed unilateral optic nerve crush. Mice received oral losartan, spironolactone, enalapril, or no drug to test effects of inhibiting angiotensin receptors. IOP was monitored by Tonolab, and blood pressure was monitored by tail cuff device. RGC loss was measured in masked axon counts and RGC bodies by β-tubulin labeling. Scleral changes that could modulate RGC injury were measured including axial length, scleral thickness, and retinal layer thicknesses, pressure-strain behavior in inflation testing, and study of angiotensin receptors and pathways by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry.

Results

Losartan treatment prevented significant RGC loss (median loss = 2.5%, p = 0.13), while median loss with water, spironolactone, and enalapril treatments were 26%, 28% and 43%; p < 0.0001). The lower RGC loss with losartan was significantly less than the loss with spironolactone or enalapril (regression model p = 0.001; drug treatment group term p = 0.01). Both losartan and enalapril significantly lowered blood pressure (p< 0.001), but losartan was protective, while enalapril led to worse than water-treated RGC loss. RGC loss after crush injury was unaffected by losartan treatment (difference from control p = 0.9). Survival of RGC in cell culture was not prolonged by sartan treatment. Axonal transport blockade after 3 day IOP elevations was less in losartan-treated than in control glaucoma eyes (p = 0.007). Losartan inhibited effects of glaucoma, including reduction in extracellular signal-related kinase activity and modification of glaucoma-related changes in scleral thickness and creep under controlled IOP.

Conclusions

The neuroprotective effect of losartan in mouse glaucoma is associated with adaptive changes in the sclera expressed at the optic nerve head.

Transtympanic steroids as a salvage therapy in sudden hearing loss: preliminary results

PURPOSE

To understand the real efficacy of transtympanic steroid therapy for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) in patients in whom traditional therapies have failed.

PROCEDURES

A prospective study was designed in order to evaluate hearing improvement in SSHL patients treated with transtympanic therapy. A solution of methyl-prednisolone (MP) and sodium bicarbonate was administered via a transtympanic injection to 8 patients. Hearing level was evaluated before therapy and at days 1, 7 and 30.

RESULTS

Hearing improvement was obtained in 75% of the patients. The patients in this category are usually considered untreatable.

CONCLUSION

Transtympanic steroid therapy is an efficacious solution for patients affected by SSHL in whom traditional therapies have failed. Further studies will be required to identify the most favourable dosage, route of administration and type of steroid. Transtympanic steroid application is safe, inexpensive, easy to perform and efficacious in cases of SSHL not responsive to traditional therapy.

Mineralocorticoid receptor mediates glucocorticoid treatment effects in the autoimmune mouse ear

The standard treatment for many hearing disorders is glucocorticoid therapy, although the cochlear mechanisms involved in steroid-responsive hearing loss are poorly understood. Cochlear dysfunction in autoimmune mice has recently been shown to be controlled with the mineralocorticoid aldosterone as effectively as with the glucocorticoid prednisolone. Because aldosterone regulates sodium, potassium, and other electrolyte homeostasis, this implied the restoration of hearing with the mineralocorticoid was due to its impact on cochlear ion transport, particularly in the stria vascularis. This also suggested glucocorticoids may be controlling hearing recovery in part through their binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor in addition to their glucocorticoid receptor-mediated anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive functions. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to better delineate the role of the mineralocorticoid receptor in steroid control of hearing in the autoimmune mouse. Spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, was administered to MRL/MpJ-Fas(lpr) autoimmune mice in combination with either aldosterone or prednisolone to compare their hearing and systemic disease with mice that received either steroid alone. ABR thresholds showed either aldosterone or prednisolone alone preserved hearing in the mice, but spironolactone prevented both steroids from maintaining normal cochlear function. This suggested both steroids are preserving hearing through the mineralocorticoid receptor within the ear to regulate endolymph homeostasis. The spironolactone treatment did not block normal glucocorticoid receptor-mediated immune-suppression functions because mice receiving prednisolone, either with or without spironolactone, maintained normal body weights, hematocrits, and serum immune complexes. Thus, reducing systemic autoimmune disease was not sufficient to control hearing if mineralocorticoid receptor-mediated functions were blocked. It was concluded the inner ear mineralocorticoid receptor is a significant target of glucocorticoids and a factor that should be considered in therapeutic treatments for steroid-responsive hearing loss.

Higher serum aldosterone correlates with lower hearing thresholds: a possible protective hormone against presbycusis

Aldosterone hormone is a mineralocorticoid secreted by adrenal gland cortex and controls serum sodium (Na(+)) and potassium (K(+)) levels. Aldosterone has a stimulatory effect on expression of sodium-potassium ATPase (Na, K-ATPase) and sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter (NKCC) in cell membranes. In the present investigation, the relation between serum aldosterone levels and age-related hearing loss (presbycusis) and the correlation between these levels versus the degree of presbycusis in humans were examined. Serum aldosterone concentrations were compared between normal hearing and presbycusic groups. Pure-tone audiometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), hearing in noise test (HINT) and gap detection were tested for each subject and compared to the serum aldosterone levels. A highly significant difference between groups in serum aldosterone concentrations was found (p = 0.0003, t = 3.95, df = 45). Highly significant correlations between pure-tone thresholds in both right and left ears, and HINT scores versus serum aldosterone levels were also discovered. On the contrary, no significant correlations were seen in the case of TEOAEs and gap detection. We conclude that aldosterone hormone may have a protective effect on hearing in old age. This effect is more peripheral than central, appearing to affect inner hair cells more than outer hair cells.