A randomized trial of the canalith repositioning procedure

Epley's Manoeuvre vs. Semont's Maneuver in Post-Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Centre

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common vestibular disorder characterized by brief episodes of vertigo triggered by changes in head position. Epley's manoeuvre and Semont's manoeuvre are widely used canalith repositioning procedures for the treatment of BPPV. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two manoeuvres in treating post-canal BPPV in a cohort of 100 patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, comparative study conducted at a tertiary care hospital. One hundred patients diagnosed with post-canal BPPV were randomized into two groups: Group A (n = 50) underwent the Epley's manoeuvre, and Group B (n = 50) underwent the Semont's manoeuvre. The patients were assessed for the resolution of vertigo and nystagmus immediately after the manoeuvre and at a follow-up visit one week later. The resolution of symptoms was confirmed through Dix-Hallpike test.

RESULTS

In Group A, 46 patients (92%) reported complete resolution of vertigo immediately after Epley's manoeuvre, and 47 patients (94%) had no nystagmus on the Dix-Hallpike test at the one-week follow-up. In Group B, 42 patients (84%) reported complete resolution of vertigo immediately after Semont's manoeuvre, and 44 patients (88%) had no nystagmus on the DH test at the one-week follow-up. The difference in effectiveness between the two manoeuvres was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both Epley's manoeuvre and Semont's manoeuvre are effective in treating post-canal BPPV, with similar success rates. The choice of manoeuvre may depend on patient preference, clinician expertise, and other individual factors. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings and explore other potential factors influencing the outcomes of canalith repositioning manoeuvres in BPPV.

Hybrid maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in individuals with limited neck mobility: Case series

INTRODUCTION

Mobility limitation of the cervical spine compromises the adequate execution of the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM) in cases of posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PSC-BPPV-GEO). Thus, novel therapeutic options are required for such individuals.

OBJECTIVES

This study describes the effects of a change in the biomechanical position for the execution of the CRM on symptoms of dizziness and mobility limitation regarding flexion-extension of the cervical spine in older people with unilateral PSC-BPPV-GEO.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental viability study was conducted with 15 older adults (11 women; mean age: 72.2 ± 8.1 years). Treatment consisted of a hybrid CRM. The participants were evaluated before and after the intervention using the modified Dix & Hallpike test, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for vertigo.

RESULTS

The modified Dix & Hallpike test was negative in all cases after the execution of the hybrid CRM. A significant reduction was found for dizziness measured using the DHI (mean difference: -39.3 ± 9.4, p < 0.001) and VAS (mean difference: -2.9 ± 0.8, p = 0.04) after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid CRM proved executable and satisfactory for resolving symptoms of dizziness in older adults with PSC-BPPV. The present findings are promising and randomized controlled clinical trials should be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the hybrid CRM in this population.

Epley manoeuvre's efficacy for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary-care and subspecialty settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point estimates or certainty of evidence. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis and clarified the efficacy of EM for BPPV, regardless of primary-care and subspecialty settings.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised sham-controlled trials of EM for the treatment of posterior canal BPPV in primary-care and subspecialty settings. A primary-care setting was defined as a practice setting by general practitioners, primary-care doctors, or family doctors. A systematic search was conducted in January 2022 across databases, including Cochrane Central Resister of Controlled Trial, MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Primary outcomes were the disappearance of subjective symptoms (vertigo), negative findings (Dix-Hallpike test), and all adverse events. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven randomised controlled trials were identified. In primary-care settings, EM reduced the subjective symptoms [risk ratio (RR), 3.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-5.02]; however, there was no applicable article for all adverse events. In the subspeciality setting, EM reduced the subjective symptoms (RR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.64-3.56), resulting in an increase in negative findings (RR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.40-2.34). The evidence exhibited uncertainty about the effect of EM on negative findings in primary-care settings and all adverse events in subspecialty settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of primary-care and subspecialty settings, EM for BPPV was effective. This study has shown the significance of performing EM for BPPV in primary-care settings. EM for BPPV in a primary-care setting may aid in preventing referrals to higher tertiary care facilities and hospitalisation for follow-up.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in protocols.io (PROTOCOL INTEGER ID: 51,464) on July 11, 2021.

Comparison of outcomes of the Epley and self-Epley maneuvers in PC-BPPV: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the self-Epley and Epley maneuvers in treating posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV) in patients at the outpatient clinic at the Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients with PC-BPPV were randomized to receive the self-Epley or Epley maneuver. The self-Epley maneuver group received illustrated instructions and a video of how to perform the self-Epley maneuver. They then performed the first self-Epley maneuver under supervision in the clinic. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated with the Dix-Hallpike test at the 1-week follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients with PC-BPPV were enrolled, 32 patients were the self-Epley maneuver group and the other 32 patients were the Epley maneuver group. After 1 week, 29 of the 32 patients (90.62 %) in the self-Epley maneuver group were cured, while 28 of the 32 patients (87.5 %) in the Epley maneuver group were cured. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates with a log-rank test for cumulative therapeutic effects at 1 week showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.755).

CONCLUSIONS

The twice-a-day self-Epley maneuver had a high success rate and could be used for patients who cannot reach a hospital or needs quarantine due to covid-19. For the self-Epley maneuver, adequate instruction is important to obtain a good result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Comparison between Epley and Gans Repositioning Maneuvers for Posterior Canal BPPV: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a condition in which a patient gets severe vertigo on moving his head from one position to another. This study aims at comparing the traditional maneuver-Epley repositioning maneuver (ERM) and the newly emerged maneuver-Gans Repositioning maneuver (GRM).

Design

A randomized controlled trial.

Settings

Tertiary care teaching University Hospital.

Participants

Posterior canal BPPV.

Intervention

Two hundred and thirty-four patients with BPPV (PC-BPPV) of the posterior canal, diagnosed using the Dix-hallpike test (DH test), were recruited for the study as per random allocation. Two groups were divided by the random allocation method. One group was treated with the Epley maneuver and the other with Gans maneuver by two separate physiotherapists.

Main Outcome Measures

DH test negativity (absence of vertigo and nystagmus), Vertigo Analogue Scale (VAS), and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Twenty-four hours post-treatment assessments and data analysis were conducted by another (third) therapist. A one month follow-up subjective assessment was performed.

Results

Results of one-variable Chi-square tests revealed significant improvement (P < .0001) in maximum (95%) patients of both groups whether subjects were given GRM or ERM. Also, objective improvement (DH test) was found in the Epley group (n = 118, 82.20%) and the Gans group (n = 116, 78.44%). Patients in both groups improved significantly with no dizziness on the VVAS scale (n = 118, 82.20%) in the Epley group and (n = 116, 78.44%) in the Gans group.

Conclusion

GRM is as easy, effective, and safe maneuver as the ERM with the absence of recurrence for the treatment of posterior canal BPPV.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials Registry (CTRI/2019/10/021681).

Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE-3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department

This third Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-3) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic adult patients with acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department (ED). A multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding five questions for adult ED patients with acute dizziness of less than 2 weeks' duration. The intended population is adults presenting to the ED with acute dizziness or vertigo. The panel derived 15 evidence-based recommendations based on the timing and triggers of the dizziness but recognizes that alternative diagnostic approaches exist, such as the STANDING protocol and nystagmus examination in combination with gait unsteadiness or the presence of vascular risk factors. As an overarching recommendation, (1) emergency clinicians should receive training in bedside physical examination techniques for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (AVS; HINTS) and the diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV; Dix-Hallpike test and Epley maneuver). To help distinguish central from peripheral causes in patients with the AVS, we recommend: (2) use HINTS (for clinicians trained in its use) in patients with nystagmus, (3) use finger rub to further aid in excluding stroke in patients with nystagmus, (4) use severity of gait unsteadiness in patients without nystagmus, (5) do not use brain computed tomography (CT), (6) do not use routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a first-line test if a clinician trained in HINTS is available, and (7) use MRI as a confirmatory test in patients with central or equivocal HINTS examinations. In patients with the spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome: (8) search for symptoms or signs of cerebral ischemia, (9) do not use CT, and (10) use CT angiography or MRI angiography if there is concern for transient ischemic attack. In patients with the triggered (positional) episodic vestibular syndrome, (11) use the Dix-Hallpike test to diagnose posterior canal BPPV (pc-BPPV), (12) do not use CT, and (13) do not use MRI routinely, unless atypical clinical features are present. In patients diagnosed with vestibular neuritis, (14) consider short-term steroids as a treatment option. In patients diagnosed with pc-BPPV, (15) treat with the Epley maneuver. It is clear that as of 2023, when applied in routine practice by emergency clinicians without special training, HINTS testing is inaccurate, partly due to use in the wrong patients and partly due to issues with its interpretation. Most emergency physicians have not received training in use of HINTS. As such, it is not standard of care, either in the legal sense of that term ("what the average physician would do in similar circumstances") or in the common parlance sense ("the standard action typically used by physicians in routine practice").

Epley maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Evidence synthesis for guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Canalith repositioning maneuvers (such as the Epley maneuver) are recommended by specialty guidelines for management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) yet are frequently underutilized in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence of Epley maneuver for the treatment of posterior canal (pc) BPPV in any setting. We included systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Epley to control in adult patients with pc-BPPV. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment was used to rate certainty of evidence. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Meta-analysis of individual studies was conducted with random and fixed effects.

RESULTS

From 2,228 titles, 7 systematic reviews were selected for quality assessment. One review was of higher methodological quality, included only RCTs, and was the most current and comprehensive. Five of the 11 RCTs of the review, including 312 patients with pc-BPPV diagnosed by Dix-Hallpike, were relevant to our question. Meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (251 patients) showed the use of Epley (as compared to control) was associated with higher complete resolution of vertigo at 1 week (OR 7.19, CI 1.52 to 33.98, moderate certainty). Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs (195 patients) showed the use of Epley was associated with higher conversion to negative Dix-Hallpike at 1 week (OR 6.67, CI 1.52 to 33.98, moderate certainty). The number-needed-to-treat was 3. Meta-analysis of the outcomes at 1 month, and when observational studies were included, showed similar results. No serious adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of pc-BPPV improve with the Epley maneuver. Emergency clinicians should become familiar with performing the Epley for BPPV. Further studies on ED implementation and clinician education of Epley are needed.

Canal switch: a possible complication of physical therapeutic manoeuvers for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Objective

To study the frequency of canal switch in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) treated by canalith repositioning manoeuver (CRP), quick liberatory rotation manoeuver (QLR) or Semont manoeuver (SM).

Methods

Retrospective study on 1158 patients, 637 women and 521 men suffering from geotropic posterior canal BPPV treated by CRP, QLR, or SM, retested after 15 minutes and about seven days.

Results

1146 patients recovered from the acute phase; treatments failed in 12 patients treated with CRP. We observed 12 canal switches from posterior to lateral canal and 2 from posterior to anterior canal during or after CRP in 13/879 cases (1.5%) and after QLR in 1/158 (0.6%) with no significant difference between CRP vs SM and QLR. We did not consider slight positional downbeat nystagmus after the therapeutic manoeuvers as a sign of canal switch into the anterior canal, but as a sign of persistent small debris in the non-ampullar arm of the posterior canal.

Conclusions

Canal switch is rare for any manoeuver and it does not belong to the criteria to choose one manoeuver over another. Notably, due to the canal switching criteria, SM and QLR cannot be preferred over those with a more prolonged extension of the neck.

Canal switch in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: Clinical characteristics and possible mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Canal switch-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (CS-BPPV) refers to the phenomenon in which otolith particles move from one canal to another (on the ipsilateral side) during or after canalith repositioning procedure (CRP). However, the clinical characteristics of CS-BPPV and the underlying pathological mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the incidence of canal switch (CS) for the different semicircular canals in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), examined nystagmus characteristics, and explored the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

Clinical data for 1,099 patients with single-canal BPPV were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The incidences of CS in the different types of BPPV were analyzed. Patients were divided into CS-BPPV and non-CS (NCS)-BPPV groups according to whether they exhibited CS after CRP. The baseline characteristics and nystagmus characteristics of patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients with BPPV who developed or did not develop CS accounted for 4.6% (51/1,099) and 95.4% (1,048/1,099), respectively, of the patients included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of the canals involved, hypertension, or diabetes. CS was observed in 3.7% (25/677) of patients with PC-BPPV, including conversion between posterior canal (PC) and horizontal canal (HC) (1.6%, 11/677), and between PC and anterior canal (AC) (2.1%, 14/677). CS was observed in 5.2% (17/327) of patients with HC-BPPV, including from HC to PC (4.3%, 14/327), and from HC to AC (0.9%, 3/327). CS was found in 9.5% (9/95) of patients with AC-BPPV, including from AC to PC (8.4%, 8/95), and from AC to HC (1.1%, 1/95). The intensity of nystagmus was significantly greater in the CS-BPPV group compared with that in the NCS-BPPV group [24.00 (11-39) vs. 12.00 (7-24), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, the incidence of direction-reversing nystagmus was significantly higher in the CS-BPPV group than in the NCS-BPPV group [31.4% (16/51) vs. 4.3% (45/1,048), P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

CS in BPPV is uncommon. Patients with AC-BPPV are more likely to develop CS, followed by patients with HC-BPPV and PC-BPPV. The occurrence of CS-BPPV may be related to the anatomical structure of the semicircular canals. When the canals contain large/heavy accumulations of otolith particles, CS may be more common during re-examination after CRP.

Experiences of patients and their health care providers with canalith repositioning maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a qualitative systematic review protocol

OBJECTIVE

This review will synthesize the evidence on the experiences of patients undergoing canalith repositioning maneuvers (provided both by health care providers and by the patients themselves) and of health care providers offering canalith repositioning maneuvers in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

INTRODUCTION

Despite having proven effectiveness for treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, the underutilization of canalith repositioning maneuvers by health care providers is a concern. Understanding the experiences of patients receiving canalith repositioning maneuvers and the experiences of the health care providers repositioning the canalith is imperative for the effective implementation of these maneuvers.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will include qualitative studies describing the experiences of health care providers or patients with canalith repositioning maneuvers provided by health care providers or by patients themselves for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, with or without other interventions, in any setting. Canalith repositioning maneuvers provided by non-qualified health professionals, non-professional caregivers, family caregivers, volunteer caregivers, or other informal caregivers will be excluded.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL will be searched. Gray literature will be searched using OpenGrey, PsyArXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and Google Scholar. Articles published in English will be considered, regardless of the publication date. Studies will be screened and critically appraised for methodological quality by 2 independent reviewers. The standardized JBI data extraction tool will be used, and the meta-aggregation approach for data synthesis and the ConQual approach for confidence evaluation will be followed.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021292993.

Variation in Canalith Repositioning Procedure Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries: Understanding the Role of Geographic Region and Provider Specialty

OBJECTIVE

Clinical practice guidelines recommend canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs) for the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). As only 10 to 20% of affected individuals receive CRPs, there is concern for guideline adherence and knowledge dissemination to relevant medical specialties. This study aimed to characterize patterns of CRP utilization over time, across all United States regions, and by provider specialty.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis with time trends of CRP claims in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service Provider Utilization and Payment database, 2012 to 2017.

SETTING

National administrative claims data.

PATIENTS

Fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries.

INTERVENTIONS

Canalith repositioning procedures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CRP utilization was analyzed by year, hospital referral region (HRR), and provider specialty.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2017, 253,894 CRPs were performed on 146,139 Medicare beneficiaries and CRP utilization increased 80%. CRP use varied widely by geographic region. In 2017, CRP use per 100,000 beneficiaries varied 113-fold across HRRs (range, 6.0-701.8, interquartile range, 68.4, extremal ratio, 116.9). Most CRPs were performed by otolaryngologists (50.9%) and physical therapists (34.3%) with few by primary care providers (1.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP utilization increased substantially suggesting improved dissemination and implementation of BPPV management guidelines. Nevertheless, wide geographic and provider-level variation remained, signifying non-uniform provider practices and access to care. Care for BPPV may thus be improved through education and incentivization of a broader range of providers.

Comparison of outcomes of the Epley and Semont maneuvers in posterior canal BPPV: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the efficacy of the Epley and Semont maneuvers in relieving posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) arising in the in patients at the Outpatient Department of the Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

METHOD

In this prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients were assigned to receive one of the two treatment methods. First, BPPV was diagnosed with the Dix-Hallpike test. Then, each patient was treated by either the Epley or Semont maneuver. Immediately afterward, the efficacy of treatments was evaluated with the Dix-Hallpike test, and dizziness intensity was assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

This study enrolled 80 patients with posterior canal BPPV, 40 of which underwent the Epley maneuver and the other 40 underwent the Semont maneuver. In the first week, The Epley maneuver cured 37 (92.5%) of the 40 patients, and the Semont maneuver cured 36 (90%) of the 40 patients. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in the efficacy of these treatments (P = .251). Regarding dizziness intensity, VAS scores decreased from 6.48 to 1.65 after the Epley maneuver and from 6.53 to 2.18 after the Semont maneuver. Statistical analysis revealed that the Epley maneuver was superior to the Semont maneuver (P = .009) in reducing dizziness intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The Epley and Semont maneuvers had similar efficacy in curing posterior canal BPPV. Regarding the severity of dizziness after treatment, the Epley maneuver produced significantly better results than did the Semont maneuver.Level of Evidence: II.

Systematic Review of Bilateral Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the success rates of canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRM) in the treatment of patients diagnosed with bilateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BiBPPV).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of only English studies in PubMed, Ovid (1946 to the present), and Embase (1974 to the present) databases was done up until January 1, 2021. Studies that diagnosed patients with BiBPPV specifically and evaluated the CRM success from all published years were included. Studies were excluded if follow-up was less than 6 months or if they failed to distinguish BiBPPV from ipsilateral multi-canal BPPV. A total of nine studies were included with a total study population of 325 patients. Included studies were evaluated for bias with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Study Quality Assessment Tool. Success rates of CRM, number of treatments required, and disease recurrence rates were extracted.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was compiled using a fixed-effect binary inverse variance model and was 95.2% (CI: 92.9%-97.5%). A qualitative review suggested treating the more affected side first on separate visits until resolved, followed by contralateral treatment (recommendation). The mean number of treatments was 2.9 (CI: 2.4-3.4), and the recurrence rate was 19.8% (CI: 11.7%-27.9%). There was a higher proportion of trauma etiology of BiBPPV compared to unilateral, with an odds ratio of 8.9 (CI: 5.1-15.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this meta-analysis shows high success rates for CRM in the treatment of BiBPPV. Rates are similar to CRM efficacy for unilateral BPPV. Laryngoscope, 2021.

Single Cycle Versus Multiple Cycles of Canalith Repositioning Procedure for Treatment of Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the treatment outcomes and complications of single cycle versus multiple cycles of the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center; Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

PATIENTS

One hundred and forty-three adults who had unilateral posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

INTERVENTION

Therapeutic. Patients received either a single cycle or multiple cycles of the CRP in one session.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of negative Dix-Hallpike test (DHT), rate of symptom improvement, dizziness handicap inventory score (DHI), and rate of complications.

RESULTS

At the 1st week and the 4th week recall visits after CRP the treatment outcomes between the single-CRP group and the multiple-CRP group showed no significant difference. The outcomes included: 1) rate of negative DHT (1st week: 76.9 and 76.7%, 4th week: 89.5 and 88.2%); 2) rate of complete recovery or improved symptoms (1st week: 92.3 and 91.7%; 4th week: 96.5 and 98.0%); 3) DHI scores (1st week: 22 and 28; 4th week: 6 and 10); and 4) complication rate (1st week: 12.5 and 20%; 4th week: 20 and 0%. Rate of complications in the single-CRP group (6.9%) during the 1st treatment was lower than in the multiple-CRP groups (21.1%) (p-value = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

A single cycle of CRP is as effective as multiple cycle CRP, with a lower incidence of complication and a decrease in the time for treatment. Single-cycle CRP is a more advantageous treatment for unilateral posterior canal BPPV. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02701218.

Episodic Positional Dizziness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides a summary of the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with episodic positional dizziness.

RECENT FINDINGS

Positional components are nearly ubiquitous among diagnoses of dizziness, so it can be challenging to classify patients with episodic positional dizziness simply based on the history of present illness. Overreliance on the presence of a report of positional components has likely resulted in misapplication or misinterpretation of positional testing and negative experiences with maneuvers to treat positional dizziness. The prototypical episodic positional dizziness disorder is benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). BPPV is caused by free-floating particles in a semicircular canal that move in response to gravity. The diagnosis is made by identifying the characteristic patterns of nystagmus on the Dix-Hallpike test. Particle repositioning for BPPV is supported by randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and practice guidelines. Other disorders that can present with episodic positional dizziness are migraine dizziness, central lesions, and light cupula syndrome.

SUMMARY

Episodic positional dizziness is a common presentation of dizziness. Neurologists should prioritize identifying and treating BPPV; doing so provides an important opportunity to deliver effective and efficient care. Providers should also recognize that positional components are common in most causes of dizziness and, therefore, should not over-rely on this part of the history of presentation when considering the diagnosis and management plan.

Poor Treatment Outcomes Following Repositioning Maneuvers in Younger and Older Adults With Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to methodically review the available evidence on poor treatment outcomes after repositioning maneuver treatments in adults with BPPV and whether there are differences in the outcomes for older and younger adults.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO (Ovid), Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies were included if they were prospective experimental or observational studies with a minimal follow-up of 1 month; the subjects were at least 18 years old, had BPPV, and were treated with repositioning maneuvers. Studies were excluded if they were not available in English full text and if the outcomes used were confined to positional tests and subjective vertigo rating. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. Meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes for younger and older (≥60 years) subjects where multiple studies utilized similar outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were selected. The methodological quality was poor in more than 60% of the studies. Treatment efficacy, based on positional test results and symptom resolution and recurrence were the most common outcomes. Balance and quality of life measures improved after treatment but were not always normalized. Residual symptoms and psychoemotional consequences persisted in some subjects, despite BPPV resolution. Meta-analyses indicated poorer dynamic balance recovery and increased self-perceived level of handicap in the older group relative to the younger group.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although repositioning maneuvers were effective in BPPV management, some patients experienced residual dizziness, postural instability, recurrences, and psychoemotional consequences at least 1 month after repositioning. Moreover, older adults experienced less improvements in dynamic balance and self-perceived handicap rating compared with younger people. These issues may further impact on older adults with BPPV physically and mentally and should be addressed by future better-quality research and interventions.

Management of Bilateral Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Objective

To describe a series of patients with bilateral benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BiBPPV), with respect to demographics, management, and outcome.

Methods

All patients who were identified and treated for BiBPPV in a previous 36-month period with a minimal follow-up period of 6 months were included. Patients were treated with Epley's maneuver (EM) on the side that was more symptomatic and that had a greater velocity and amplitude of tortional nystagmus. Patients were re-treated according to symptoms and findings on follow-up visits.

Results

Ten patients were identified with BiBPPV. Most patients complained of nonlocalized positional vertigo and unsteadiness. Four were males and 6 were females, and the mean age was 54 years. There was a positive history of recent head trauma in 4 of the patients. All patients recovered after performing a mean of 2.6 EMs during a 3-month period. One patient experienced unilateral recurrence and was re-treated successfully.

Conclusion

BiBPPV has typical characteristics and can be managed successfully with EM, performed on the more symptomatic side, followed by repeated treatments as needed.

Ebm Rating: C

© 2005 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.

Optimal reassessment time for treatment response in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The present study aimed to evaluate the optimal reassessment time for treatment response in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV) following the initial Epley maneuver.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, single-blinded, randomized study.

METHODS

One hundred eight patients with PC-BPPV agreed to participate. These patients received a single modified Epley maneuver (recommended by the 2008 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines) daily until positional nystagmus disappeared during the Dix-Hallpike maneuver 24 hours after the treatment. Repeated Dix-Hallpike testing to reassess the treatment response was performed at 1 hour (post-1 hour), every 24 hours (post-24 hours) until the positional nystagmus resolved, 1 week (post-1 week), and 1 month (post-1 month) following the therapeutic maneuver. The difference in the resolution rates at post-1 hour and post-24 hours reassessment was analyzed, and the recurrence rates at post-1 week and post-1 month were evaluated.

RESULTS

The resolution rate was 67.6% at post-1 hour, which increased to 79.6% at post-24 hours reassessment. There was a statistically significant difference in the results of the Dix-Hallpike test between post-1 hour and post-24 hours follow-up. After complete resolution, nine out of 108 patients (8.3%) demonstrated recurrence within 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

Reassessment after 24 hours following the initial Epley maneuver is more advantageous than a 1-hour follow-up in patients with PC-BPPV. This information may be helpful for clinicians in deciding the appropriate follow-up period after treatment for PC-BPPV.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b Laryngoscope, 130:496-499, 2020.

Diagnosis strategy and Yacovino maneuver for anterior canal-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnosis strategy of anterior canal-benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (AC-BPPV) and the therapeutic effects of the Yacovino maneuver.

METHODS

The clinical data of 40 AC-BPPV patients were collected. The nystagmus characteristics induced by the Dix-Hallpike (D-H) and straight head-hanging (SHH) tests, the diagnostic methods used, and the effectiveness of the Yacovino maneuver for the treatment of AC-BPPV were all retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 40 cases analyzed, 19 patients had simple AC-BPPV, 11 patients had AC-posterior canal BPPV, and 10 patients had AC-horizontal canal BPPV. D-H and SHH tests showed down-beating nystagmus in 26 and 33 patients, respectively, and showed down-beating and torsional nystagmus in 14 and 7 patients, respectively. AC-BPPV was diagnosed in 15 patients based on the presence of typical BPPV in other canals, in 9 patients based on typical disease history and the results of position tests, in 6 patients based on effectiveness of the treatment with the Yacovino maneuver, in 4 patients based on the treatment effectiveness and the presence of typical BPPV in other canals, in 3 patients based on the treatment effectiveness and the follow-up outcome, in 2 patients based on the typical BPPV in other canals and occurrence of canal conversion, and in 1 patient based on the treatment effectiveness and occurrence of canal conversion. Thirteen patients with canalolithiasis and four patients with cupulolithiasis were cured after the initial Yacovino maneuver treatment. Twenty-one patients with canalolithiasis and seven patients with cupulolithiasis were cured following 1 week of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the Yacovino maneuver, the follow-up outcome, the presence of typical BPPV in other canals, and the occurrence of canal conversions contribute to AC-BPPV diagnosis. The Yacovino maneuver was found to be more effective in AC-BPPV patients with canalolithiasis than in those with cupulolithiasis.

Implementation of evidence-based practice for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: DIZZTINCT- A study protocol for an exploratory stepped-wedge randomized trial

Background

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common peripheral vestibular disorder, and accounts for 8% of individuals with moderate or severe dizziness. BPPV patients experience substantial inconveniences and disabilities during symptomatic periods. BPPV therapeutic processes – the Dix-Hallpike Test (DHT) and the Canalith Repositioning Maneuver (CRM) – have an evidence base that is at the clinical practice guideline level. The most commonly used CRM is the modified Epley maneuver. The DHT is the gold standard test for BPPV and the CRM is supported by numerous randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. Despite this, BPPV care processes are underutilized.

Methods/design

This is a stepped-wedge, randomized clinical trial of a multi-faceted educational and care-process-based intervention designed to improve the guideline-concordant care of patients with BPPV presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dizziness. The unit of randomization and target of intervention is the hospital. After an initial observation period, the six hospitals will undergo the intervention in five waves (two closely integrated hospitals will be paired). The order will be randomized. The primary endpoint is measured at the individual patient level, and is the presence of documentation of either the Dix-Hallpike Test or CRM. The secondary endpoints are referral to a health care provider qualified to treat dizziness for CRM and 90-day stroke rates following an ED dizziness visit. Formative evaluations are also performed to monitor and identify potential and actual influences on the progress and effectiveness of the implementation efforts.

Discussion

If this study safely increases documentation of the DHT/CRM, this will be an important step in implementing the use of these evidenced-based processes of care. Positive results will support conducting larger-scale follow-up studies that assess patient outcomes. The data collection also enables evaluation of potential and actual influences on the progress and effectiveness of the implementation efforts.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02809599. The record was first available to the public on 22 June 2016 prior to the enrollment of the first patients in October 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3099-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Diagnosis and treatment of anterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of anterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (AC-BPPV).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of clinical data regarding the diagnosis and treatment of patients with AC-BPPV.

STUDY SAMPLE

Six patients with AC-BPPV.

RESULTS

All patients underwent the Dix-Hallpike test and/or the straight head-hanging test to induce vertigo and down-beating nystagmus with or without torsional components. Down-beating nystagmus in patients 1, 3 and 6 lasted <1 min and was successfully treated with the Yacovino manoeuvre. Down-beating nystagmus in patients 2, 4 and 5 lasted >1 min. The Yacovino manoeuvre was not effective in patient 4, whereas it was effective in patient 2 but with frequently recurring symptoms. Patients 3, 4 and 6 also had other types of typical BPPV. Canal conversion appeared in patients 4 and 5 during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Typical BPPV, canal conversion, a therapeutic diagnosis after applying the Yacovino manoeuvre, and the follow-up outcome contribute to AC-BPPV diagnosis in patients with dizziness and vertigo presenting with down-beating positional nystagmus. Yacovino manoeuvre was more effective in AC-BPPV patients with down-beating positional nystagmus lasted <1 min than in those in whom it lasted >1 min.

Analyses with the Video Head Impulse Test During the Canalith Repositioning Maneuver in Patients with Isolated Posterior Semicircular Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

Objective

To evaluate the posterior semicircular canal (PSCC) functions using video head impulse test (vHIT) during canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM) treatment in patients with isolated, posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PSCC-BPPV).

Methods

A total of 44 subjects comprising of 24 subjects with isolated PSCC-BPPV and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were enrolled in the present study. vHIT was performed for the affected PSCC before and just after CRM and at the third and seventh day and first month to evaluate vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, gain asymmetry (GA), and corrective saccades. Repeated determinations of VOR gain and GA were compared to evaluate the time course of vHIT measurements during CRM treatment in isolated PSCC-BPPV patients, and the values were also compared with the control group.

Results

VOR gains and GA values were not statistically different before and after CRM and at the third-day, seventh-day and first-month visits for the affected PSCC. Moreover, values did not differ between the BPPV and control groups, and none of the subjects demonstrated corrective saccades.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this study is the first report to investigate vHIT measurements with a time course of alterations during CRM treatment in PSCC-BPPV patients. vHIT may not provide an additional contribution for evaluating vestibular dysfunction during the diagnosis and treatment of isolated PSCC-BPPV.

Age-Related Increases in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Are Reversed in Women Taking Estrogen Replacement Therapy: A Population-Based Study in Taiwan

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of peripheral vertigo. Numerous investigations have reported an increased BPPV incidence in females and in the aged population. The hormonal characteristics of BPPV patients have not been previously investigated. This study aimed to determine the risk of BPPV in relation to menopause in a population-based study.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective population-based study was designed to use a nationwide longitudinal health insurance database to follow and analyze the incidence of and protective factors against BPPV in a Taiwanese population.

Data Analyses: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for the incidence of BPPV using Cox-proportional regression models.

Results: In the multivariate analyses, we found that older people (older than 65 years old) were more prone to develop BPPV (aHR: 5.37, 95% CI: 0 4.83–5.97, p < 0.001). The risk of BPPV was analyzed in two specific age subgroups of elderly females. Results revealed that in both age groups (45–65 years old and >65 years old), patients who took estrogen for menopausal syndromes had a significantly lower incidence of BPPV (aHR; 0.01, 95% CI: 0.06–0.23, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study provides a novel etiology and possible treatment method for the prevention of BPPV. Further studies may focus on the pathophysiological mechanism of estrogen in BPPV patients and the development of new drugs for the prevention and treatment of BPPV.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (Update)

Objective

This update of a 2008 guideline from the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation provides evidence-based recommendations to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), defined as a disorder of the inner ear characterized by repeated episodes of positional vertigo. Changes from the prior guideline include a consumer advocate added to the update group; new evidence from 2 clinical practice guidelines, 20 systematic reviews, and 27 randomized controlled trials; enhanced emphasis on patient education and shared decision making; a new algorithm to clarify action statement relationships; and new and expanded recommendations for the diagnosis and management of BPPV.

Purpose

The primary purposes of this guideline are to improve the quality of care and outcomes for BPPV by improving the accurate and efficient diagnosis of BPPV, reducing the inappropriate use of vestibular suppressant medications, decreasing the inappropriate use of ancillary testing such as radiographic imaging, and increasing the use of appropriate therapeutic repositioning maneuvers. The guideline is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with BPPV, and it applies to any setting in which BPPV would be identified, monitored, or managed. The target patient for the guideline is aged ≥18 years with a suspected or potential diagnosis of BPPV. The primary outcome considered in this guideline is the resolution of the symptoms associated with BPPV. Secondary outcomes considered include an increased rate of accurate diagnoses of BPPV, a more efficient return to regular activities and work, decreased use of inappropriate medications and unnecessary diagnostic tests, reduction in recurrence of BPPV, and reduction in adverse events associated with undiagnosed or untreated BPPV. Other outcomes considered include minimizing costs in the diagnosis and treatment of BPPV, minimizing potentially unnecessary return physician visits, and maximizing the health-related quality of life of individuals afflicted with BPPV.

Action Statements

The update group made strong recommendations that clinicians should (1) diagnose posterior semicircular canal BPPV when vertigo associated with torsional, upbeating nystagmus is provoked by the Dix-Hallpike maneuver, performed by bringing the patient from an upright to supine position with the head turned 45° to one side and neck extended 20° with the affected ear down, and (2) treat, or refer to a clinician who can treat, patients with posterior canal BPPV with a canalith repositioning procedure. The update group made a strong recommendation against postprocedural postural restrictions after canalith repositioning procedure for posterior canal BPPV. The update group made recommendations that the clinician should (1) perform, or refer to a clinician who can perform, a supine roll test to assess for lateral semicircular canal BPPV if the patient has a history compatible with BPPV and the Dix-Hallpike test exhibits horizontal or no nystagmus; (2) differentiate, or refer to a clinician who can differentiate, BPPV from other causes of imbalance, dizziness, and vertigo; (3) assess patients with BPPV for factors that modify management, including impaired mobility or balance, central nervous system disorders, a lack of home support, and/or increased risk for falling; (4) reassess patients within 1 month after an initial period of observation or treatment to document resolution or persistence of symptoms; (5) evaluate, or refer to a clinician who can evaluate, patients with persistent symptoms for unresolved BPPV and/or underlying peripheral vestibular or central nervous system disorders; and (6) educate patients regarding the impact of BPPV on their safety, the potential for disease recurrence, and the importance of follow-up. The update group made recommendations against (1) radiographic imaging for a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant imaging, (2) vestibular testing for a patient who meets diagnostic criteria for BPPV in the absence of additional vestibular signs and/or symptoms inconsistent with BPPV that warrant testing, and (3) routinely treating BPPV with vestibular suppressant medications such as antihistamines and/or benzodiazepines. The guideline update group provided the options that clinicians may offer (1) observation with follow-up as initial management for patients with BPPV and (2) vestibular rehabilitation, either self-administered or with a clinician, in the treatment of BPPV.

[Treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo]

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common peripheral vestibular disorder. BPPV is easily diagnosed by positioning tests and effectively treated by repositioning maneuvers. The authors focus on the treatment of BPPV, when different canals are affected, including canalo- and cupulolithiasias. Complications of BPPV and surgery of cases, resistant to conservative treatment, are also discussed.

Epley and Semont maneuvers for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Using network meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Epley and Semont maneuvers as treatment options for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

STUDY DESIGN

Network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized controlled studies with a Jadad score ≥ 3 that used an Epley or Semont maneuver in posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients were analyzed in this project. The following efficacy outcomes included 1-week recovery rate and end of study recovery rate. Recurrence rate was used to assess the safety of each treatment.

RESULTS

Of 589 articles, 12 studies that enrolled 999 posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients were selected. The pooled analysis revealed that the Epley maneuver was as efficacious as the Semont maneuver, in both the 1-week recovery rate and end of study recovery rate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-7.00; OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.47-7.20), and had a similar recurrence rate (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.33-4.4). These two techniques were both better than sham-controlled treatment in the two efficacy indicators. No difference was observed in recurrence rate for treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The Epley maneuver was similar to the Semont maneuver in both efficacy and safety for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in short-term effects, and both were superior to the sham-controlled treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Anterior-Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Systematic Review

Background and Purpose

In contrast to the posterior- and horizontal-canal variants, data on the frequency and therapeutic management of anterior-canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (AC-BPPV) are sparse. To synthesize the existing body of evidence into a systematic review regarding the incidence and treatment of AC-BPPV.

Methods

Systematic search of medical databases employing predefined criteria, using the term "anterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo."

Results

The electronic search retrieved 178 unique citations, 31 of which were considered eligible for further analysis. Analysis of the collected data revealed an estimated occurrence of AC-BPPV among benign paroxysmal positional vertigo patients of 3% (range 1-17.1%). No controlled therapeutic trials could be identified, and so the analysis was focused on uncontrolled case series. Treatment was categorized into three groups: Epley maneuver, Yacovino maneuver, and specific, nonstandard maneuvers described in individual articles. All three categories demonstrated success rates of over 75%, and the overall sample-size-weighted mean was 85.6%.

Conclusions

The present analysis demonstrated that AC-BPPV comprises about 3% of all BPPV cases. It can be treated safely using the Epley, Yacovino, and other maneuvers with rates of symptom resolution lying in the range of that reported for the other, more frequent canal variants. Multicenter controlled trials are needed in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of AC-BPPV.

Management of 210 patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: AMC protocol and outcomes

CONCLUSION

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) could be treated with specific maneuvers for the involved canals. Management on a daily basis gave earlier relief than weekly treatment, especially in apogeotropic BPPV. Apogeotropic and multi-canal BPPVs were related to the increased numbers of follow-ups and trauma was related to the increased recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to report the short-term outcomes of our protocol for BPPV and evaluate the factors influencing the results and recurrence.

METHODS

In 210 BPPV patients, posterior semicircular canal (PSCC), geotropic and apogeotropic lateral canal BPPVs were treated with the Epley maneuver, barbecue maneuver, and barbecue maneuver after head-shaking. The total number of follow-ups needed to have no provoked nystagmus, success rates at 1 week and 1 month, and factors for repeated maneuvers or recurrence were identified.

RESULTS

Apogeotropic and multi-canal BPPV needed more follow-ups than PSCC BPPV. Multi-canal BPPV showed a significantly lower 1-week success rate than other types. Anterior and multi-canal BPPV showed significantly lower 1-month success rates than other types. The 1-week success rates for PSCC and geotropic and apogeotropic BPPV in patients followed up on a daily basis were higher than those in patients with weekly follow-up and the difference was significant only in apogeotropic BPPV. The overall 1-year recurrence rate was 16% and higher recurrence rate was related to trauma.

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: opportunities squandered

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) presentations are unique opportunities to simultaneously improve the effectiveness and efficiency of care. The test and treatment for BPPV--the Dix-Hallpike test (DHT) and the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM), respectively--are supported by two evidence-based guidelines (American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery and American Academy of Neurology). With these processes, patients can be readily identified and treated at the bedside, quickly and without expensive tests. Patients randomized to the CRM have a cure rate of 80% at 24 h, compared to only 10% of controls. Despite this large effect size, less than 10% of affected patients receive the treatment, which shows that the management of BPPV in routine care is suboptimal. Future research is necessary to disseminate and implement the DHT and the CRM into routine practice.

The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

BACKGROUND

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2002 and previously updated in 2004 and 2007.Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a syndrome characterised by short-lived episodes of vertigo in association with rapid changes in head position. It is a common cause of vertigo presenting to primary care and specialist otolaryngology clinics. Current treatment approaches include rehabilitative exercises and physical manoeuvres, including the Epley manoeuvre.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of the Epley manoeuvre for posterior canal BPPV.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; CENTRAL; PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the most recent search was 23 January 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of the Epley manoeuvre versus placebo, no treatment or other active treatment for adults diagnosed with posterior canal BPPV (including a positive Dix-Hallpike test). The primary outcome of interest was complete resolution of vertigo symptoms. Secondary outcomes were conversion of a 'positive' Dix-Hallpike test to a 'negative' Dix-Hallpike test and adverse effects of treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 trials in the review with a total of 745 patients.Five studies compared the efficacy of the Epley manoeuvre against a sham manoeuvre, three against other particle repositioning manoeuvres (Semont, Brandt-Daroff and Gans) and three against a control (no treatment, medication only, postural restriction). Patients were treated in hospital otolaryngology departments in eight studies and family practices in two studies. All patients were adults aged 18 to 90 years old, with a sex ratio of 1:1.5 male to female.There was a low risk of overall bias in the studies included. All studies were randomised with six applying sealed envelope or external allocation techniques. Eight of the trials blinded the assessors to the participants' treatment group and data on all outcomes for all participants were reported in eight of the 11 studies. Complete resolution of vertigo Complete resolution of vertigo occurred significantly more often in the Epley treatment group when compared to a sham manoeuvre or control (odds ratio (OR) 4.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.62 to 7.44; five studies, 273 participants); the proportion of patients resolving increased from 21% to 56%. None of the trials comparing Epley versus other particle repositioning manoeuvres reported vertigo resolution as an outcome. Conversion of Dix-Hallpike positional test result from positive to negative Conversion from a positive to a negative Dix-Hallpike test significantly favoured the Epley treatment group when compared to a sham manoeuvre or control (OR 9.62, 95% CI 6.0 to 15.42; eight studies, 507 participants). There was no difference when comparing the Epley with the Semont manoeuvre (two studies, 117 participants) or the Epley with the Gans manoeuvre (one study, 58 participants). In one study a single Epley treatment was more effective than a week of three times daily Brandt-Daroff exercises (OR 12.38, 95% CI 4.32 to 35.47; 81 participants). Adverse effects Adverse effects were infrequently reported. There were no serious adverse effects of treatment. Rates of nausea during the repositioning manoeuvre varied from 16.7% to 32%. Some patients were unable to tolerate the manoeuvres because of cervical spine problems.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that the Epley manoeuvre is a safe, effective treatment for posterior canal BPPV, based on the results of 11, mostly small, randomised controlled trials with relatively short follow-up. There is a high recurrence rate of BPPV after treatment (36%). Outcomes for Epley manoeuvre treatment are comparable to treatment with Semont and Gans manoeuvres, but superior to Brandt-Daroff exercises.

Natural history of horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo is truly short

The objective of the study is to characterize the natural course of positional vertigo and nystagmus in patients with horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (h-BPPV) and to analyze the difference in the natural course between the two variants of h-BPPV. We conducted a prospective study in 106 patients with geotropic type h-BPPV [h-BPPV (Geo)] (n = 43) and apogeotropic type h-BPPV [h-BPPV (Apo)] (n = 63) who agreed and signed the written informed consent of no treatment. All patients were asked to answer a detailed interview about the onset time of positional vertigo and to visit the hospital every 1-3 days. At every visit, they were interviewed about cessation time of positional vertigo and positional nystagmus was assessed. The mean period ± SD between the onset and remission of vertigo in the h-BPPV (Geo) was 6.7 ± 6.3 days, whereas that in the h-BPPV (Apo) was 3.7 ± 4.1 days. In addition, the mean period ± SD from the initial diagnosis to the disappearance of positional nystagmus in the h-BPPV (Geo) was 4.7 ± 3.9 days, whereas that in the h-BPPV (Apo) was 4.4 ± 5.0 days. Although the duration until natural remission of positional nystagmus did not differ between the two variants of h-BPPV, the remission of vertigo occurred faster in h-BPPV (Apo) than h-BPPV (Geo) (p < 0.05). The natural course of h-BPPV is much shorter than that indicated in previous reports. The positional vertigo disappeared faster in the h-BPPV (Apo) compared to the h-BPPV (Geo) unlike the positional nystagmus.

Efficacy of computer-controlled repositioning procedure for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the short-term efficacy of the computer-controlled canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) for treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) compared with the current standard CRP.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-two patients diagnosed as having idiopathic posterior canal BPPV, with an age range of 28 to 86 years (mean 56 years), 47 men and 85 women, were treated with computer-controlled CRP mimicking the Epley maneuver. Resolution of vertigo and nystagmus on the Dix-Hallpike test at 1-week follow-up after treatment was the main outcome measure to assess the efficacy of treatment.

RESULTS

At 1-week follow-up after treatment with computer-controlled CRP, 108 (81.8%) of 132 patients had complete resolution of vertigo and nystagmus, nine (6.8%) had resolution of vertigo but presence of nystagmus, and 15 (11.4%) had provoked vertigo and nystagmus on the Dix-Hallpike test. The 81.8% success rate was comparable to those who received current standard CRP treatment in randomized controlled trials at about 80%. No significant adverse effects or complications occurred in the patients treated with computer-controlled CRP, aside from two patients (1.5%) with conversion into lateral canal BPPV.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer-controlled CRP is effective for the treatment of posterior canal BPPV, with a success rate similar to those treated with the Epley maneuver, and is safe and easy to perform on patients.

Canal conversion between anterior and posterior semicircular canal in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of canal conversion between the anterior and posterior semicircular canals in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Secondary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 709 patients who were treated with the Epley maneuver for BPPV of the anterior or posterior semicircular canal.

INTERVENTIONS

Vestibular examinations with videonystagmography and the canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) to treat BPPV.

RESULTS

Canal conversion between the anterior and posterior semicircular canals was observed in 18 (2.9%) patients who underwent CRP. In 13 (2.3%) of 564 patients initially diagnosed with posterior canal BPPV (PC-BPPV), switch to anterior canal BPPV (AC-BPPV) was observed at a follow-up visit. In 5 (12.1%) of 41 patients who presented with AC-BPPV, canal switch to PC-BPPV occurred more frequently (p = 0.005). The average number of CRPs before nystagmus resolution was 3.6 in conversion cases versus 1.6 in the nonconversion group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Canal conversion between the anterior and posterior semicircular canals can occur during treatment. The possibility of canal conversions should be considered for appropriate management of BPPV of the vertical semicircular canals.

Increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a 9-year follow-up nationwide population study in taiwan

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common form of vertigo and is characterized by episodic dizziness related to changes in head position relative to gravity. BPPV symptoms can be similar to those of central nervous system vascular diseases. The association between BPPV and ischemic stroke has not yet been investigated. The study cohort consisted of patients who were diagnosed with BPPV at least twice in the previous year as an outpatient or for whom BPPV was the primary diagnosis as an inpatient (n = 4104). An age- and gender-matched sample that excluded patients with a diagnosis of any form of vertigo was selected as the comparison cohort (n = 8397). All cases were followed up from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2008. The demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, and use of medications in both groups were investigated using chi-square tests. A stratified analysis of stroke risk factors was performed to determine the hazard ratios of BPPV. During the 9-year follow-up period, 185 of the 4104 (4.5%) subjects with BPPV and 240 of the 8379 (2.9%) subjects without BPPV developed ischemic strokes. The crude hazard ratio of BPPV for developing ischemic strokes was 1.708. After adjusting for stroke risk factors, the risk of developing ischemic strokes in BPPV subjects was 1.415-fold higher than the risk among those without BPPV (confidence interval: 1.162-1.732, p = 0.001). After a subgroup analysis stratified according to stroke risk factors, BPPV remained independently associated with a higher risk of developing future ischemic stroke. We conclude that BPPV is independently associated with a risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. More aggressive control of modifiable risk factors for ischemic strokes should be conducted in patients with BPPV.

Rapid Systematic Review of Repeated Application of the Epley Maneuver for Treating Posterior BPPV

Objective

To evaluate the effect of repeated application of the Epley maneuver on patient-reported symptom relief and resolution of nystagmus in patients with posterior benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (p-BPPV).

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted. Studies reporting original study data were included. Relevance and risk of bias (RoB) of the selected articles were assessed. Studies with low relevance, high RoB, or both were excluded. Success percentages and mean values were extracted.

Results

A total of 955 unique studies were retrieved. Fourteen of these satisfied the eligibility criteria. All of the included studies carried a high relevance and a moderate RoB. The majority of studies were 1-armed trials, in which the Epley was repeated only in case previous attempt(s) had failed. The maneuver was not repeated if it was successful. In 32% to 90% of patients, the first treatment session was successful. Reported cumulative success percentages ranged from 40% to 100% after the second session, 67% to 98% after the third session, 87% to 100% after the fourth session, and 100% in the studies in which patients received 5 sessions. One study evaluating the effect of multiple maneuvers in a single session showed a rise in success percentages from 84% for 1 maneuver to 90% after 2 maneuvers and 92% after 3 maneuvers.

Conclusion

Multiple studies with moderate RoB show a beneficial effect of multiple sessions of the Epley maneuver in p-BPPV patients who are not fully cleared of symptoms after the first session.

Vestibular suppressants after canalith repositioning in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate the characteristics of residual symptoms and to evaluate the effects of adjuvant vestibular suppressants on residual symptoms after successful canalith repositioning procedures (CRPs).

STUDY DESIGN

Individual randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

One hundred fifty patients with idiopathic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo who achieved successful CRPs on initial visit participated in this study. Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) questionnaires were completed before CRPs. All study populations were divided into three groups after successful CRPs on the initial visit day: the medication (V) group (treated with a vestibular suppressant [dimenhydrinate 50 mg per day]), the placebo (P) group, and the no medication (N) group. One week after successful CRPs, residual symptoms were checked and repeated DHI questionnaires were completed to compare residual symptoms.

RESULTS

Among the 138 patients who did not show positional nystagmus at follow-up, 67 (48.5%) complained of residual symptoms. The presence of residual symptoms was more prevalent in the P and N group compared with the V group (P = .035, P = .017, respectively). The most frequent residual symptom was lightheadedness (n = 42). Moreover, in the V group, lightheadedness was significantly reduced compared with the P group (P = .029). However, in the analysis of DHI, total and subscale scores did not differ across the three groups before or after successful CRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Vestibular suppressants significantly reduced residual symptoms compared to both placebo and no medication after CRP. However, there was no significant reduction in DHI score compared with the control group, suggesting that the residual symptoms could not be evaluated by DHI score alone.

Rapid Systematic Review of the Epley Maneuver for Treating Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare watchful waiting to the Epley maneuver as a management option for patients with posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (p-BPPV) regarding symptom relief.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted. Studies reporting original study data were included. Relevance and risk of bias (RoB) of the selected articles were assessed. Studies with low relevance, high RoB, or both were excluded. Absolute risk differences and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted for the included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1448 unique studies were retrieved. Eight of these satisfied the eligibility criteria. At 1-week follow-up, all included studies reported a clinically relevant effect in favor of the Epley maneuver regarding symptom relief (absolute risk differences ranging from 20% [95% CI, 5%-37%] to 59% [95% CI, 32%-76%]) or conversion to a negative Dix-Hallpike (absolute risk differences ranging from 17% [95% CI, -5%-37%] to 64% [95% CI, 29%-79%]). At 1-month follow-up, the results of the included studies diverged further. Absolute risk differences ranged from 6% (95% CI, -24%-35%) more symptom relief in favor of watchful waiting to 79% (95% CI, 56%-88%) in favor of the Epley maneuver.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

All data of the selected studies show a benefit in favor of the Epley maneuver at 1-week follow-up in the management of p-BPPV. The Epley maneuver should be considered in all patients with p-BPPV.

Canal conversion after repositioning procedures: comparison of Semont and Epley maneuver

Although the efficacy of Semont (SM) and Epley maneuvers (EM) for treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is well established, data comparing SM and EM regarding maneuver-induced canal switch are lacking. We prospectively investigated 102 posterior canal BPPV patients after application of the Semont or the Epley maneuver and looked for the appearance of ipsilateral horizontal canal BPPV symptoms. Although treatment success was similar for SM and EM (67 and 76 %, respectively), there was a significant difference in posterior-to-horizontal canal switch rates. In particular, 4 of 51 patients (7.8 %) of the EM group converted to the geotropic type of horizontal canal BPPV, whereas none of the 51 SM patients exhibited a canal switch. All four patients were cleared with a single barbecue maneuver. Our data suggest a small but significant difference in canal switch rate between EM and SM, which could be partly explained by the higher number of maneuver steps during which the head is in the dependent position throughout the EM.

Evidence-based practice: management of vertigo

The article focuses on the evidence basis for the management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, the most common diagnosis of vertigo in both primary care and subspecialty settings. An overview is presented, along with evidence-based clinical assessment, diagnosis, and management. Summaries of differential diagnosis of vertigo and outcomes are presented.