Bilateral Chronic Electrostimulation of Ventroposterolateral Pallidum: A New Therapeutic Approach for Alleviating All Parkinsonian Symptoms

Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Looking back, looking forward

Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) may present with prodromal (e.g. hyposmia, sleep disorders, constipation), motor (e.g. tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia, postural dysfunction) and non-motor (e.g. cognitive dysfunction, depression) symptoms.1 Treatment is symptomatic, targeting motor and non-motor manifestations, but there is presently no effective disease modifying treatment.1 Although PD therapies have primarily been focused on supplementing dopamine, which has improved survival and quality of life of PD patients,1-3 other neurotransmitter systems (e.g. serotonergic, cholinergic and noradrenergic) are also dysfunctional, especially for the non-motor symptoms.1,4,5 By the time patients reach the later stages of PD, many of them would have developed significant gait and balance difficulties, dysarthria, dysphagia and motor fluctuations like wearing off and levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID), as well as non-motor symptoms such as orthostasis, depression, dementia and psychosis.1,2,6,7

The Effects of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.F.) Wall. Ex Nees and Andrographolide on Neuroinflammation in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) affect millions of people worldwide, and to date, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases are the most common NDs. Of the many risk factors for neurodegeneration, the aging process has the most significant impact, to the extent that it is tempting to consider neurodegenerative disease as a manifestation of accelerated aging. However, genetic and environmental factors determine the course of neurodegenerative disease progression. It has been proposed that environmental stimuli influence neuroplasticity. Some clinical studies have shown that healthy lifestyles and the administration of nutraceuticals containing bioactive molecules possessing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties have a preventive impact or mitigate symptoms in previously diagnosed patients. Despite ongoing research efforts, the therapies currently used for the treatment of NDs provide only marginal therapeutic benefits; therefore, the focus is now directly on the search for natural products that could be valuable tools in combating these diseases, including the natural compound Andrographis paniculata (Ap) and its main constituent, andrographolide (Andro). Preclinical studies have shown that the aqueous extract of Ap can modulate neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses, reducing inflammatory markers and oxidative stress in various NDs. Therefore, in this review, we will focus on the molecular mechanisms by which Ap and Andro can modulate the processes of neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, which are significant causes of neuronal death and cognitive decline.

Update on Current Technologies for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is becoming increasingly central in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. Recent developments in DBS lead and implantable pulse generator design provide increased flexibility for programming, potentially improving the therapeutic benefit of stimulation. Directional DBS leads may increase the therapeutic window of stimulation by providing a means of avoiding current spread to structures that might give rise to stimulation-related side effects. Similarly, control of current to individual contacts on a DBS lead allows for shaping of the electric field produced between multiple active contacts. The following review aims to describe the recent developments in DBS system technology and the features of each commercially available DBS system. The advantages of each system are reviewed, and general considerations for choosing the most appropriate system are discussed.

Deep-brain stimulation

Deep-brain stimulation (DBS) is a clinical intervention that has provided remarkable therapeutic benefits for otherwise treatment-resistant movement and affective disorders. The resulting direct causal manipulation of both local and distributed brain networks is not only clinically helpful but can also help to provide novel fundamental insights into brain function. In particular, DBS can be used in conjunction with methods such as local field potentials and magnetoencephalography to map the underlying mechanisms of normal and abnormal oscillatory synchronization in the brain. The precise mechanisms of action for DBS remain uncertain but here we present an overview of the clinical efficacy of DBS, its neural mechanisms and potential future applications.

Studies of stimulus parameters for seizure disruption using neural network simulations

A large scale neural network simulation with realistic cortical architecture has been undertaken to investigate the effects of external electrical stimulation on the propagation and evolution of ongoing seizure activity. This is an effort to explore the parameter space of stimulation variables to uncover promising avenues of research for this therapeutic modality. The model consists of an approximately 800 mum x 800 mum region of simulated cortex, and includes seven neuron classes organized by cortical layer, inhibitory or excitatory properties, and electrophysiological characteristics. The cell dynamics are governed by a modified version of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations in single compartment format. Axonal connections are patterned after histological data and published models of local cortical wiring. Stimulation induced action potentials take place at the axon initial segments, according to threshold requirements on the applied electric field distribution. Stimulation induced action potentials in horizontal axonal branches are also separately simulated. The calculations are performed on a 16 node distributed 32-bit processor system. Clear differences in seizure evolution are presented for stimulated versus the undisturbed rhythmic activity. Data is provided for frequency dependent stimulation effects demonstrating a plateau effect of stimulation efficacy as the applied frequency is increased from 60 to 200 Hz. Timing of the stimulation with respect to the underlying rhythmic activity demonstrates a phase dependent sensitivity. Electrode height and position effects are also presented. Using a dipole stimulation electrode arrangement, clear orientation effects of the dipole with respect to the model connectivity is also demonstrated. A sensitivity analysis of these results as a function of the stimulation threshold is also provided.

Neuromodulation of prelemniscal radiations in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), tetrapolar electrodes were implanted in the prelemniscal radiations (RAPRL) to treat tremor, rigidity and bradykinesia. Fifteen patients were implanted unilaterally and five patients bilaterally and followed-up for one year. The selection criteria included the presence of unilateral pronounced tremor and rigidity in patients implanted unilaterally or bilateral symptoms including severe bradykinesia in patients implanted bilaterally. In the operating room, the tremor decreased significantly or was abolished following the insertion of the electrode in the RAPRL. This effect was temporary and subsided when the stimulation was off. However, when the stimulator was turned on, the severity of the symptoms and signs decreased significantly. The post-implantation MRI confirmed that the electrode contacts used for stimulation were inserted in RAPRL, a group of fibers located between the red nucleus and subthalamic nucleus, above the substantia nigra, medially to the zona incerta and below the thalamus. The patients were evaluated using the UPDRS part III, before implantation and every 3 months during the first year. Global scores decreased significantly. The pre- and postoperative median values (range in round brackets) were as follows: tremor improved from 3 (2-16) to 1 (2-3) (p<0.001); rigidity was either abolished or decreased markedly from 2 (1-16) to 0 (0-4) (p< 0.001); bradykinesia improved from 2 (0-4) to 1 (0-2) (p<0.001). We conclude that RAPRL, an area anatomically different from STN, is a good target for electrical stimulation in order to treat effectively all the main symptoms of PD.

The surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease

Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) can provide gratifying symptomatic improvements for many individuals who suffer from persistent disabling symptoms despite the best available medical management. Current surgical therapies include ablative techniques (thalamotomy and pallidotomy), augmentative techniques (nondestructive) (deep brain stimulation), and restorative techniques (tissue transplantation and gene therapy). Ablative procedures can provide substantial clinical benefit, but the current trend is toward deep brain stimulation, which can provide similar symptomatic improvement in a nondestructive manner. Restorative techniques, such as tissue transplantation and gene therapy, are exciting but have significant obstacles to overcome before their promise can be realized. Until the underlying pathological defect of PD can be identified and treated, surgical intervention is likely to remain important in the symptomatic treatment of this disabling disease.

Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

In many patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, treatment with levodopa is complicated by fluctuations between an "off" period, when the medication is not working and the motor symptoms of parkinsonism are present, and an "on" period, when the medication is causing improved mobility, often accompanied by debilitating dyskinesias. In animal models of Parkinson's disease, there is overactivity in the subthalamic nucleus, and electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves parkinsonism. We therefore sought to determine the efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We studied 24 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease in whom electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the subthalamic nucleus under stereotactic guidance with imaging and electrophysiologic testing of the location. Twenty were followed for at least 12 months. Clinical evaluations included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, a dyskinesia scale, and timed tests conducted before and after surgery, when patients were off and on medications.

RESULTS

After one year of electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus, the patients' scores for activities of daily living and motor examination scores (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale parts II and III, respectively) off medication improved by 60 percent (P<0.001). The subscores improved for limb akinesia, rigidity, tremor, and gait. In the testing done on medication, the scores on part III improved by 10 percent (P<0.005). The mean dose of dopaminergic drugs was reduced by half. The cognitive-performance scores remained unchanged, but one patient had paralysis and aphasia after an intracerebral hematoma during the implantation procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus is an effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. The severity of symptoms off medication decreases, and the dose of levodopa can be reduced with consequent reduction in dyskinesias.

Posteroventral medial pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Posteroventral medial pallidotomy sometimes produces striking improvement in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, but the studies to date have involved small numbers of patients and short-term follow-up.

METHODS

Forty patients with Parkinson's disease underwent serial, detailed assessments both after drug withdrawal ("off" period) and while taking their optimal medical regimens ("on" period). All patients were examined preoperatively and 39 were examined at six months; 27 of the patients were also examined at one year, and 11 at two years.

RESULTS

The percent improvements at six months were as follows: off-period score for overall motor function, 28 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 38 percent), with most of the improvement in the contralateral limbs; off-period score for activities of daily living, 29 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 39 percent); on-period score for contralateral dyskinesias, 82 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 72 to 91 percent); and on-period score for ipsilateral dyskinesias, 44 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 29 to 59 percent). The improvements in dyskinesias and the total scores for off-period parkinsonism, contralateral bradykinesia, and rigidity were sustained in the 11 patients examined at two years. The improvement in ipsilateral dyskinesias was lost after one year, and the improvements in postural stability and gait lasted only three to six months. Approximately half the patients who had been dependent on assistance in activities of daily living in the off period before surgery became independent after surgery. The complications of surgery were generally well tolerated, and there were no significant changes in the use of medication.

CONCLUSIONS

In late-stage Parkinson's disease, pallidotomy significantly reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesias and off-period disability. Much of the benefit is sustained at two years, although some improvements, such as those on the ipsilateral side and in axial symptoms, wane within the first year. The on-period symptoms that are resistant to dopaminergic therapy do not respond to pallidotomy.

Pallidal stimulation: an alternative to pallidotomy?

A resurgence of interest in the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) came with the rediscovery of posteroventral pallidotomy by Laitinen in 1985. Laitinen's procedure improved most symptoms in drug-resistant PD, which engendered wide interest in the neurosurgical community. Another lesioning procedure, ventrolateral thalamotomy, has become a powerful alternative to stimulate the nucleus ventralis intermedius, producing high long-term success rates and low morbidity rates. Pallidal stimulation has not met with the same success. According to the literature pallidotomy improves the “on” symptoms of PD, such as dyskinesias, as well as the “off” symptoms, such as rigidity, bradykinesia, and on-off fluctuations. Pallidal stimulation improves bradykinesia and rigidity to a minor extent; however, its strength seems to be in improving levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Stimulation often produces an improvement in the hyper- or dyskinetic upper limbs, but increases the “freezing” phenomenon in the lower limbs at the same time. Considering the small increase in the patient's independence, the high costs of bilateral implants, and the difficulty most patients experience in handling the devices, the question arises as to whether bilateral pallidal stimulation is a real alternative to pallidotomy.

Neuropsychological functioning before and after unilateral thalamic stimulating electrode implantation in Parkinson's disease

One theoretical advantage of chronic thalamic stimulation compared with thalamotomy for the treatment of refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) entails the avoidance and reversibility of potential cognitive morbidity. Support for the cognitive safety of thalamic stimulation remains largely anecdotal; empirical data are limited to the neuropsychological findings published for one small series of patients. The purpose of this study was to supplement those published findings that pertain to the mean changes in neuropsychological test scores and to extend previous findings by evaluating cognitive changes in individual cases from preoperative baseline to 4 months after electrode implantation. Nine patients with tremor-dominant, refractory PD underwent unilateral implantation of a deep brain stimulating electrode in the ventralis intermedius thalamic nucleus (five patients on their left and four patients on their right sides). A neuropsychological test battery was administered to each patient to evaluate attention, language, memory, and visuoperceptual and executive functions during their best “on” state before surgery, while on a medication regimen, and with the stimulator turned on after surgery. As a group, the patients attained significantly higher scores on word list recognition (discriminability) and delayed recall of prose passages after surgery than before surgery. In addition, there was a trend toward higher scores on a visual confrontation naming test after surgery. Examination of individual patient data indicated gains and losses in test scores exceeding two standard deviations to be very rare. Changes of one standard deviation were also relatively rare, but gains were more likely to occur than losses. These observations provide preliminary support for the cognitive safety of thalamic stimulation for PD.

Efficacy of bilateral pallidotomy

Unilateral pallidotomy is a safe and effective treatment for medically refractory bradykinetic Parkinson's disease, especially in those patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesia and severe on-off fluctuations. The efficacy of bilateral pallidotomy is less certain.

The authors completed 11 of 12 attempted bilateral pallidotomies among 150 patients undergoing pallidotomy at New York University. In all but one patient, the pallidotomies were separated by at least 9 months. Patients were selected for bilateral pallidotomy if they exhibited bilateral rigidity, bradykinesia, or levodopa-induced dyskinesia prior to treatment or if they exhibited disease progression contralateral to their previously treated side.

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and timed upper-extremity tasks of the Core Assessment Protocol for Intracerebral Transplantation (CAPIT) were administered to all 12 patients in the “off” state (12 hours without receiving medications) preoperatively and again at 6 and 12 months after each procedure. The median UPDRS and contralateral CAPIT scores improved 60% following the initial procedure (p = 0.008, Wilcoxon rank sums test). The second pallidotomy generated only an additional 10% improvement in the UPDRS and CAPIT scores ipsilateral to the original procedure (p = 0.05). Worsened speech was observed in two cases. In the 12th case, total speech arrest was noted during test stimulation. Speech returned within minutes after stimulation was halted. Lesioning was not performed.

These results indicate that bilateral pallidotomy has a narrow therapeutic window. Motor improvement ipsilateral to the first lesion leaves little room for further improvement from the second lesion and the risk of speech deficit is greatly enhanced. Chronic pallidal stimulation contralateral to a previously successful pallidotomy may prove to be a safer alternative for the subset of patients who require bilateral procedures.