Limits of intermittent jugular bulb oxygen saturation monitoring in the management of severe head trauma patients

Cerebral Perfusion and Brain Oxygen Saturation Monitoring with: Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation, Cerebral Oximetry, and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography

Accumulating evidence indicates that cerebral desaturation in the perioperative period occurs more frequently than recognized. Combining monitoring modalities that reflect different aspects of cerebral perfusion status, such as near-infrared spectroscopy, jugular bulb saturation, and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, may provide an extended window for prevention, early detection, and prompt intervention in ongoing hypoxic/ischemic neuronal injury and, thereby, improve neurologic outcome. Such an approach would minimize the impact of limitations of each monitoring modality, while individual components complement each other, enhancing the accuracy of acquired information. Current literature has failed to demonstrate any clear-cut clinical benefit of these modalities on outcome prognosis.

Aspects on the Physiological and Biochemical Foundations of Neurocritical Care

Neurocritical care (NCC) is a branch of intensive care medicine characterized by specific physiological and biochemical monitoring techniques necessary for identifying cerebral adverse events and for evaluating specific therapies. Information is primarily obtained from physiological variables related to intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) and from physiological and biochemical variables related to cerebral energy metabolism. Non-surgical therapies developed for treating increased ICP are based on knowledge regarding transport of water across the intact and injured blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the regulation of CBF. Brain volume is strictly controlled as the BBB permeability to crystalloids is very low restricting net transport of water across the capillary wall. Cerebral pressure autoregulation prevents changes in intracranial blood volume and intracapillary hydrostatic pressure at variations in arterial blood pressure. Information regarding cerebral oxidative metabolism is obtained from measurements of brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO2) and biochemical data obtained from intracerebral microdialysis. As interstitial lactate/pyruvate (LP) ratio instantaneously reflects shifts in intracellular cytoplasmatic redox state, it is an important indicator of compromised cerebral oxidative metabolism. The combined information obtained from PbtO2, LP ratio, and the pattern of biochemical variables reveals whether impaired oxidative metabolism is due to insufficient perfusion (ischemia) or mitochondrial dysfunction. Intracerebral microdialysis and PbtO2 give information from a very small volume of tissue. Accordingly, clinical interpretation of the data must be based on information of the probe location in relation to focal brain damage. Attempts to evaluate global cerebral energy state from microdialysis of intraventricular fluid and from the LP ratio of the draining venous blood have recently been presented. To be of clinical relevance, the information from all monitoring techniques should be presented bedside online. Accordingly, in the future, the chemical variables obtained from microdialysis will probably be analyzed by biochemical sensors.

Traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology for neurocritical care

Severe cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI) require neurocritical care, the goal being to stabilize hemodynamics and systemic oxygenation to prevent secondary brain injury. It is reported that approximately 45 % of dysoxygenation episodes during critical care have both extracranial and intracranial causes, such as intracranial hypertension and brain edema. For this reason, neurocritical care is incomplete if it only focuses on prevention of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) or decreased cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). Arterial hypotension is a major risk factor for secondary brain injury, but hypertension with a loss of autoregulation response or excess hyperventilation to reduce ICP can also result in a critical condition in the brain and is associated with a poor outcome after TBI. Moreover, brain injury itself stimulates systemic inflammation, leading to increased permeability of the blood–brain barrier, exacerbated by secondary brain injury and resulting in increased ICP. Indeed, systemic inflammatory response syndrome after TBI reflects the extent of tissue damage at onset and predicts further tissue disruption, producing a worsening clinical condition and ultimately a poor outcome.

Elevation of blood catecholamine levels after severe brain damage has been reported to contribute to the regulation of the cytokine network, but this phenomenon is a systemic protective response against systemic insults. Catecholamines are directly involved in the regulation of cytokines, and elevated levels appear to influence the immune system during stress. Medical complications are the leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in many types of brain damage. Neurocritical care after severe TBI has therefore been refined to focus not only on secondary brain injury but also on systemic organ damage after excitation of sympathetic nerves following a stress reaction.

Multimodality Neuromonitoring in Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Review of the Current Resources

Brain insults in children represent a daily challenge in neurocritical care. Having a constant grasp on various parameters in the pediatric injured brain may affect the patient's outcome. Currently, new advances provide clinicians with the ability to utilize several modalities to monitor brain function. This multi-modal approach allows real-time information, leading to faster responses in management and furthermore avoiding secondary insults in the injured brain.

Monitoring of brain and systemic oxygenation in neurocritical care patients

Maintenance of adequate oxygenation is a mainstay of intensive care, however, recommendations on the safety, accuracy, and the potential clinical utility of invasive and non-invasive tools to monitor brain and systemic oxygenation in neurocritical care are lacking. A literature search was conducted for English language articles describing bedside brain and systemic oxygen monitoring in neurocritical care patients from 1980 to August 2013. Imaging techniques e.g., PET are not considered. A total of 281 studies were included, the majority described patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). All tools for oxygen monitoring are safe. Parenchymal brain oxygen (PbtO2) monitoring is accurate to detect brain hypoxia, and it is recommended to titrate individual targets of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), ventilator parameters (PaCO2, PaO2), and transfusion, and to manage intracranial hypertension, in combination with ICP monitoring. SjvO2 is less accurate than PbtO2. Given limited data, NIRS is not recommended at present for adult patients who require neurocritical care. Systemic monitoring of oxygen (PaO2, SaO2, SpO2) and CO2 (PaCO2, end-tidal CO2) is recommended in patients who require neurocritical care.

My paper 20 years later: cerebral venous oxygen saturation studied with bilateral samples in the internal jugular veins

INTRODUCTION

Jugular oxygen saturation monitoring was introduced in neurointensive care after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) to explore the adequacy of brain perfusion and guide therapeutic interventions. The brain was considered homogeneous, and oxygen saturation was taken as representative of the whole organ. We investigated whether venous outflow from the brain was homogeneous by measuring oxygen saturation simultaneously from the two jugular veins.

METHODS

In 32 comatose TBI patients both internal jugular veins (IJs) were simultaneously explored using intermittent samples; hemoglobin saturation was also recorded continuously by fiber-optic catheters in five patients. In five cases long catheters were inserted bilaterally upstream, up to the sigmoid sinuses.

MAIN FINDINGS

On average, measurements from the two sides were in agreement (mean and standard deviation of the differences between the saturation of the two IJs were respectively 5.32 and 5.15). However, 15 patients showed differences of more than 15 % in hemoglobin saturation at some point; three others showed differences larger than 10 %. No relationship was found between the computed tomographic scan data and the hemoglobin saturation pattern.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Several groups have confirmed differences between oxygen saturation in the two jugular veins. After years of enthusiasm, interest for jugular saturation has decreased and more modern methods, such as tissue oxygenation monitoring, are now available. Jugular saturation monitoring has low sensitivity, with the risk of missing low saturation, but high specificity; moreover it is cheap, when used with intermittent sampling. Monitoring the adequacy of brain perfusion after severe TBI is essential. However the choice of a specific monitor depends on local resources and expertise.

Update on multimodality monitoring

Brain injury is a dynamic process marked by an initial damaging insult followed by a cascade of physical, electrical, and metabolic changes capable of resulting in further patient disability. These subclinical changes should be detected at a time when therapeutic intervention is most efficacious and preemptive. Multimodality monitoring is the practice by which a variety of brain monitors are utilized to deliver care, specific to the needs of the individual patient, in an attempt to minimize secondary injury and long-term disability. Intracranial pressure, continuous electroencephalography, brain tissue oxygen, cerebral microdialysis, cerebral blood flow, and jugular oximetry monitoring have been utilized to direct treatment of the critical ill neurologic and neurosurgical patient. Optimization of monitoring technique and protocol is an ongoing effort of intensivists in the field of neurocritical care.

Methods of monitoring brain oxygenation

INTRODUCTION

Posttraumatic brain ischemia or hypoxia is a major potential cause of secondary injury that may lead to poor outcome. Avoidance, or amelioration, of this secondary injury depends on early diagnosis and intervention before permanent injury occurs. However, tools to monitor brain oxygenation continuously in the neuro-intensive care unit have been lacking.

DISCUSSION

In recent times, methods of monitoring aspects of brain oxygenation continuously by the bedside have been evaluated in several experimental and clinical series and are potentially changing the way we manage head-injured patients. These monitors have the potential to alert the clinician to possible secondary injury and enable intervention, help interpret pathophysiological changes (e.g., hyperemia causing raised intracranial pressure), monitor interventions (e.g., hyperventilation for increased intracranial pressure), and prognosticate. This review focuses on jugular venous saturation, brain tissue oxygen tension, and near-infrared spectroscopy as practical methods that may have an important role in managing patients with brain injury, with a particular focus on the available evidence in children. However, to use these monitors effectively and to understand the studies in which these monitors are employed, it is important for the clinician to appreciate the technical characteristics of each monitor, as well as respective strengths and limitations of each. It is equally important that the clinician understands relevant aspects of brain oxygen physiology and head trauma pathophysiology to enable correct interpretation of the monitored data and therefore to direct an appropriate therapeutic response that is likely to benefit, not harm, the patient.

Cerebral arterio-venous pCO2 difference, estimated respiratory quotient, and early posttraumatic outcome: comparison with arterio-venous lactate and oxygen differences

Arterio-venous pCO2 difference (AVDpCO2) and estimated respiratory quotient, the ratio between AVDpCO2 and arterio-venous O2 difference, may be potentially useful estimators of irreversible posttraumatic global cerebral ischemia. Our aim was to evaluate their relevance, along with arterio-venous lactate difference (AVDL) and lactate oxygen index (LOI), in early outcome prediction. The retrospective study involved 55 patients with severe head injury, admitted consecutively in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a general hospital. A retrograde jugular catheter was placed as soon as possible, allowing for 324 simultaneous arterio-jugular samples to be taken throughout the first 48-hour postinjury. Early brain death (within 48 h) was assumed to be due to early global ischemia. A multivariate model including clinical and radiologic descriptors and jugular bulb variables showed that a widening of AVDL and LOI was associated with early brain death. Whereas in the patients who died, a progressive worsening of AVDpCO2 and estimated respiratory quotient, associated with corresponding changes in AVDL and LOI were observed, in patients who survived the widening of AVDpCO2 normalized along with that of arterio-venous O2 difference. These findings suggest that the isolated measurement of widening AVDpCO2 is not specific for global cerebral ischemia, but its observation over time could be potentially more useful.

Multimodal monitoring in the ICU: When could it be useful?

In the neurointensive care unit, neurologic monitoring is depended upon to signal the onset of neurologic decline. Many monitoring techniques such as intracranial pressure monitoring, cerebral perfusion pressure measurement, jugular venous oxygen saturation, transcranial Doppler ultrasound and continuous electroencephalogram are commonly practiced. Newer methods of monitoring include quantitative EEG, direct cerebral blood flow measurements, cerebral microdialysis, brain tissue oxygenation and cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy. When used in combination, as in multimodal monitoring, the goal is to overcome some of the disadvantages of each technique and to achieve a higher degree of accuracy in detecting secondary brain insults. However, such a large amount of data can be generated that such combinations have to be chosen carefully, or the monitoring data will not be able to be acted upon quickly enough to be of benefit to the patient.

The acute care of traumatic brain injury

During the past few decades, management of acute traumatic brain injury has advanced substantially on several fronts. Implementation of rapid transport systems and the advent of trauma centres, together with advances in emergency medicine, critical care medicine and trauma neurosurgery, have improved outcome following head injury. Technological advances made during the past years in the field of invasive neuromonitoring that provide real-time information on brain oxygenation may further improve outcome by enabling individualized therapies for intracranial hypertension. Furthermore, these recent technological advances will provide insights into the pathophysiological processes that are active in traumatic brain injury and a better understanding of the biochemical effects of specific therapeutic regimens.

Outcome in neurocritical care: Advances in monitoring and treatment and effect of a specialized neurocritical care team

OBJECTIVE

To review current advances in the treatment of critically ill neurologic patients, including specialized care by neurointensivists.

DESIGN

Review article.

MAIN DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Significant developments in the fields of neurology and neurosurgery have led to improved treatments for the critically ill neurologic patient. The major areas reviewed include neuromonitoring, disease-specific treatments, and specialized neurocritical care units and team. The current trend is for the application of the so-called multimodality neuromonitoring, which includes the use of several monitoring techniques, including intracranial pressure, brain electrophysiology, brain metabolism and oxygenation, and cerebral blood flow, among others. Many new therapies that have been introduced are discussed, including thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke, induced hypothermia for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest, and endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Lastly, the introduction of neurointensivists and neurocritical care units has been associated with reduced hospital mortality and resource utilization without changes in readmission rates or long-term mortality rates.

Monitoring the injured brain: ICP and CBF

Raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and low cerebral blood flow (CBF) are associated with ischaemia and poor outcome after brain injury. Therefore, many management protocols target these parameters. This overview summarizes the technical aspects of ICP and CBF monitoring, and their role in the clinical management of brain-injured patients. Furthermore, some applications of these methods in current research are highlighted. ICP is typically measured using probes that are inserted into one of the lateral ventricles or the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic measures used to control ICP have relevant side-effects and continuous monitoring is essential to guide such therapies. ICP is also required to calculate cerebral perfusion pressure which is one of the most important therapeutic targets in brain-injured patients. Several bedside CBF monitoring devices are available. However, most do not measure CBF but rather a parameter that is thought to be proportional to CBF. Frequently used methods include transcranial Doppler which measures blood flow velocity and may be helpful for the diagnosis and monitoring of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage or jugular bulb oximetry which gives information on adequacy of CBF in relation to the metabolic demand of the brain. However, there is no clear evidence that incorporating data from CBF monitors into our management strategies improves outcome in brain-injured patients.

Arterio-Jugular Difference of Oxygen Content and Outcome After Head Injury

This study investigated AJDO2 (arterio-jugular difference of oxygen content) in a large sample of severely head-injured patients to identify its pattern during the first days after injury and to describe the relationship of AJDO2 with acute neurological severity and with outcome 6 mo after trauma. In 229 comatose head-injured patients, we monitored intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and AJDO2. Outcome was defined 6 mo after injury. Jugular hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SjO2) averaged 68%. The mean AJDO2 was 4.24 vol% (SD, 1.3 vol%). There were 80 measurements (4.6%) with SjO2 <55% and 304 (17.6%) with saturation >75%. AJDO2 was higher than 8.7 vol% in 8 measurements (0.4%) and was lower than 3.9 vol% in 718 (42%) measurements. AJDO2 was higher during the first tests and decreased steadily over the next few days. Cases with a favorable outcome had a higher mean AJDO2 (4.3 vol%; SD, 0.3 vol%) than patients with severe disability or vegetative status (3.8 vol%; SD, 1.3 vol%) and patients who died (3.6 vol%; SD, 1 vol%). This difference was significant (P < 0.001). We conclude that low levels of AJDO2 are correlated with a poor prognosis, whereas normal or high levels of AJDO2 are predictive of better results.

Diagnosis and monitoring of hemorrhagic shock during the initial resuscitation of multiple trauma patients: a review

The initial management of the multiple trauma victim requires evaluation for potential hemorrhage and ongoing monitoring to assess the efficacy of resuscitation and avoid complications related to hemorrhagic shock. A variety of strategies exist to assess circulatory status, including hemodynamic monitoring, tissue perfusion measurement, and use of serum markers of metabolism. We review available technologies used to assess fluid status and tissue perfusion in patients with blood loss or hemorrhagic shock, discuss how these methods can be used effectively and efficiently during initial trauma resuscitation to guide therapy and disposition, and suggest directions for future research to improve outcomes by providing more appropriate and timely care and avoiding unnecessary complications.

[Multimodal monitoring of head injuries in children]

As in the case of adults, there are three main goals in the monitoring of severe head trauma in children: to prevent or minimize the apparition of secondary lesions, to optimize treatment, to help make precise prognosis. The basic monitoring is composed of repeated clinical examinations, brain radiological imaging and control of vital parameters (blood pressure, temperature, PaO2 (SpO2), PaCO2 (FETCO2), haemoglobin, haematocrit. On the other hand, during specific brain monitoring, the brain perfusion (TCD, intracranial pressure), the electrical activity of the brain and sometimes the brain oxygenation (SvjO2) are controlled. The data obtained from the brain monitoring must always be interpreted carefully. A child with a severe head trauma, in ICU, always requires constant and competent medical attention.

Monitoring neurologic patients in intensive care

The brain is sensitive to changes in substrate delivery. In neurologically critically ill patients (e.g., those with head injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or stroke), interruption of this supply causes ischemic brain damage and thus impairs the outcome. To prevent, detect, and treat these ischemic events as soon as possible, the cerebral blood flow is continuously monitored, its coupling or not with the consumption of oxygen and so forth, and the detected derangements of normal physiology. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure are two parameters that often reflect ischemic events, and thus it is mandatory to continuously measure them. To better assess cerebral hemodynamics, jugular bulb oxymetry and brain pressure tissue oxygen monitoring are two neuromonitoring techniques that allow for a better understanding of the balance between oxygen supply and consumption, and therefore are useful in directing therapy. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography is a noninvasive technique with the same purpose but with less clinical relevance. The new neuromonitoring technique, microdialysis, is useful for understanding the mechanisms involved in brain ischemia. However, it is clear that the physician who interprets the measurements given by devices and the clinical data (e.g., temperature, glycemia) is still the cornerstone in the management of neurologically critically ill patients.

Application of technology in the treatment of traumatic brain injury

The goal of care of the traumatic brain-injured patient is to prevent secondary injury. Technology gives the caregivers information as to the cause and severity of injury and can guide appropriate management of the patient. Use of multimodality monitoring increases the complexity of care but may allow for better targeted therapy. This article will discuss the current state of technology, the physiology and pathophysiology that it assesses, the normal and abnormal values obtained, and how care will be impacted.

Head injury: recent past, present, and future

There is no question that substantial progress has been made over the last 30 years, since the pioneering multinational studies of Jennett and colleagues, in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in the production, progression, and amelioration of brain damage. The introduction of computed tomography and simple but elegant classifications of the severity of injury (e.g., the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Glasgow Outcome Scale) were seminal milestones in neurotraumatology. When neurosurgeons such as Langfitt, Becker, and Miller took advantage of the pioneering investigations of intracranial hypertension by Janny and Lundberg and combined them with imaging, classification of brain damage, and improvements in emergency medical services, substantial gains were soon made. However, given the perspective of the beginning of the 21 st century, one can see those gains as relatively straightforward, as they have required the consolidation of concepts and ideas that fit together relatively easily. Better attention to easily delineated abnormalities, such as shock, hypoxia, and hypercarbia, and the early evacuation of mass lesions coupled with the concurrent development of modern principles of critical care account for substantial reductions in mortality and a reduction in the number of vegetative, contracted, spastic survivors. Future improvement in the care of patients with head injuries will increasingly be dependent on advances in molecular neurobiology and psychology, our ability to successfully modulate genetic expression, and progress in the treatment of related illnesses, such as stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, depression, and Alzheimer's disease.