Resorbable internal splint: an adjunct to primary correction of unilateral cleft lip-nasal deformity

Craniofacial and three-dimensional palatal analysis in cleft lip and palate patients treated in Spain

Growth alterations have been described in patients operated on for oral clefts. The purpose of this work was to analyze the craniofacial and palate morphology and dimensions of young adults operated on for oral clefts in early childhood in Spain. Eighty-three patients from eight different hospitals were divided into four groups based on their type of cleft: cleft lip (CL, n = 6), unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP, n = 37), bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP, n = 16), and cleft palate only (CPO, n = 24). A control group was formed of 71 individuals. Three-dimensional (3D) digital models were obtained from all groups with an intraoral scanner, together with cephalometries and frontal, lateral, and submental facial photographs. Measurements were obtained and analyzed statistically. Our results showed craniofacial alterations in the BCLP, UCLP, and CPO groups with an influence on the palate, maxilla, and mandible and a direct impact on facial appearance. This effect was more severe in the BCLP group. Measurements in the CL group were similar to those in the control group. Cleft characteristics and cleft type seem to be the main determining factors of long-term craniofacial growth alterations in these patients. Prospective research is needed to clearly delineate the effects of different treatments on the craniofacial appearance of adult cleft patients.

Custom nasal stent and columellar reconstruction after a rhinoplasty complication: A clinical report

Nostril stenosis is typically caused by retraction and contraction after trauma or infection, although loss of nasal tissue is not common during rhinoplasty. This clinical report describes the fabrication of a nasal stent to replace the lost columella and a columella prosthesis for a patient who had had reconstructive surgery for nasal valve collapse and a missing columella. The stent established a comfortable means of nasal air exchange that was also esthetically acceptable. The stent also provided the necessary support for the nasal tissue before further nasal reconstructive surgeries.

Photogrammetric Outcomes of Primary Nasal Correction in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients: Early Childhood Results From a Single Surgeon's Experience

BACKGROUND

Concerns of nonlasting results and potential nasal growth damage precluded cleft nasal correction at the time of initial cleft lip repair. Our goal was to evaluate the outcome of primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip who underwent primary cleft nasal correction from 2010 to 2017 by the same surgeon was performed. The cleft-to-noncleft nostril height, width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nasal sill height, and nostril area ratios, as well as inner nostril height-to-width ratios were determined from standard basilar view photographs taken in different time points (T1, <3 months; T2, 3-12 months; T3, 12-36 months; and T4, >36 months after surgery). A 5-point visual analog scale (1 = worst, 5 = best) was used to assess each patient's nose appearance.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were identified (66.7% male, 51.3% with a complete cleft lip). Average visual analog scale scores T1-T4 were 3.88 ± 0.85, 3.72 ± 0.93, 3.54 ± 0.99, and 3.40 ± 0.71, respectively. Intraclass correlation ranged from 0.61 to 0.94. A significant decrease [mean difference (SD)] was found for cleft-to-noncleft nostril width ratio [0.15 (0.18)] from T1 to T2, and an increase for one-fourth medial height ratio [-0.09 (0.07)] and for inner nostril height-to-width ratio in the noncleft side [-0.23 (0.25)] from T1 to T3. Thirteen patients required secondary surgical revision.

CONCLUSION

Based on photogrammetry, primary cleft nasal correction in our patients with unilateral cleft lip achieved acceptable and stable outcomes during early childhood.

Nasal Alar Surface Area Differences After Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Long-Term Effects of the Perialar Incision

BACKGROUND

The Millard rotation-advancement cleft lip repair is the most commonly performed cleft lip repair. An extended perialar incision allows for further advancement of the lateral lip element and improved positioning of the alar base. There is a lack of data evaluating differences in nasal alar growth when the perialar incision is utilized. This study compares the long-term effects of a perialar incision on the alar surface area of unilateral cleft lip patients who underwent a Millard cleft lip repair.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of unilateral cleft lip treated with a Millard primary lip repair were studied. A perialar incision was utilized in 16 patients while 21 patients underwent a standard Millard repair. 3dMD facial images were taken at least 10 years after the initial lip repair. Using the patient's non-cleft side as an internal control, the Alar Ratio (AR) was calculated, defined as the cleft alar surface area divided by the non-cleft alar surface area.

RESULTS

The AR was significantly greater in the standard Millard repair group compared to the perialar incision group, 0.74 and 0.64 respectively (P = .02). The incomplete cleft population demonstrated a more profound difference between the treatment groups (0.82 and 0.62, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals an association between a perialar incision and decreased alar surface area. Long-term follow up results suggest a perialar scar restricts alar growth leading to significant asymmetry between the cleft and non-cleft sides. Therefore, surgical technique must be carefully considered prior to utilizing a perialar incision during unilateral cleft lip repair.

Primary Rhinoplasty Does Not Interfere with Nasal Growth: A Long-Term Three-Dimensional Morphometric Outcome Study in Patients with Unilateral Cleft

BACKGROUND

Primary rhinoplasty has not been universally adopted because the potential for nasal growth impairment remains an unsolved issue in cleft care. This study's purpose was to assess the long-term effects of primary rhinoplasty performed by a single surgeon in a cohort of patients with a unilateral cleft lip nose deformity.

METHODS

Three-dimensional nasal morphometric measurements (linear, angular, proportional, surface area, and volume) were collected from consecutive patients (cleft group, n = 52; mean age, 19 ± 1 year) who had undergone primary rhinoplasty with the use of the Noordhoff approach between 1995 and 2002 and reached skeletal maturity. Normal age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched subjects (control group, n = 52) were identified for comparative analyses.

RESULTS

No significant differences (all p > 0.05) were observed for most measures, including nasal height, alar width, nasal dorsum angle, columellar angle, columellar-labial angle, nasal tip/height ratio, nasal index, alar width/intercanthal distance ratio, nasal surface area, and nasal volume. The cleft group displayed significantly (all p < 0.05) lower nasal bridge length and nasal tip projection, and greater nasal protrusion, tip/midline deviation, nasal tip angle, nasal tip protrusion width index, and alar width/mouth ratio values than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary rhinoplasty does not interfere with nasal growth as measured by three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. Further imaging studies are required for the assessment of development in other anatomical nasal structures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Foundation-Based Approach to Primary Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip results in disruption of the nasal foundation and collapse of tip structures. Most approaches to primary rhinoplasty focus on correction of lower lateral cartilages; however, recurrent deformity is common, and secondary revision is frequently required. The authors describe an alternate approach that focuses on the foundation to "upright the nose," without any nasal tip dissection. This study assessed changes with surgery and with growth. Secondary goals were to compare methods of sidewall reconstruction and septoplasty and to identify predictors of relapse.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing repair (n = 102) were assessed. Images were captured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 5 years of age (when available) using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. Standard anthropometric and contemporary shape-based analysis (volume ratio, dorsal deviation, and alar-cheek definition) was performed to assess longitudinal changes. Images of age-matched normal control subjects were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Significant changes in anthropometric and morphometric measurements occurred following surgery. Postoperative form was similar to controls immediately after surgery and at 5 years. Nasal corrections were satisfactory, and only two patients have elected to undergo revision. When subjects were grouped according to cleft type, we found the same trends. When comparing different methods of nasal sidewall reconstruction or septoplasty, we found no differences. Alveolar cleft width was a significant predictor of worse preoperative and postoperative form.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant nasal correction can be achieved by means of reconstruction of nasal foundation, without nasal tip dissection. Preservation of tissue planes may allow for easier secondary revision, if necessary.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A Simple and Economical Nasal Conformer for Clefts!

Aim

To develop a nasal conformer for cleft lip repair which should be easily available and economical.

Method

We have used 'Luer mount' of the infant feeding tube as a nasal conformer in 14 patients.

Result

Follow-up period ranged from 2 weeks to 3 months. Results were satisfactory in all the patients. No significant complications were noticed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

This nasal conformer is easy to use and cost-effective. Though it is not as soft as silicon-based nasal stent but, it provides good support for maintaining the shape of nasal cartilage.

Quality of life and nasal splints after primary cleft lip and nose repair: Prospective assessment of information and tolerance

Splints are commonly used after primary cleft surgery in order to secure the position of the nasal cartilages. Although the importance of splints is more and more stressed in the literature, many questions remain unanswered relative to the psychological impact of this device on children and families. Two questionnaires, Information and Tolerance, were used in order to measure the quality of life (QoL) associated with the use of nasal splints after primary cleft surgery. Information assessed the understanding of the parents the day before the procedure. Tolerance assessed their experience 3 months after splint placement. We prospectively included 41 consecutive patients from a Paris cleft center, 21 consecutive patients from a Russian center (Moscow) and 10 consecutive patients form a another French center (Nantes). In Paris and Nantes, an initial fixed splint was placed during the procedure until day 10, and then replaced by a removable splint for a period of 4 months. In the Moscow group, removable splints were used primarily for a total period of 4 months. Three types of removable splints were considered: commercial anatomical self-retentive splints (Nose-Fit™, Moscow, Russian Federation), in-house anatomical self-retentive splints and commercial Talmant-type splints requiring taping (Sebbin, Boissy-l'Aillerie, France). The data was analyzed as Likert scales and internal consistency was assessed using the Cronbach coefficient. Age at surgery, uni- or bilateral cleft, type of splint, number of splint changes and complications were tested against the scores of the questionnaires using multivariate models. We did not find correlations between the factors assessed by the multivariate analysis and the splint type. Information and Tolerance scores were high and showed satisfactory QoL associated with the use of splints. The internal consistency of the combination of the two forms was good. While the effects of splints on nasal morphology still need to be confirmed based on a controlled prospective study, we show here that this device is well tolerated by families and is not associated with specific complications.

Outcomes of Closed Versus Open Technique of Rhinoplasty During Primary Repair of Unilateral Cleft Lip: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Primary cleft rhinoplasty has almost become the norm in cleft practice. Although various closed and open rhinoplasty techniques are in use, there is no consensus as to which technique is superior in terms of outcome. The authors hypothesized that the long-term outcomes of open rhinoplasty during primary cleft lip repair in unilateral cleft is better than that of the closed method. This systematic review has been done to evaluate the hypothesis by a review and analysis of literature.

METHODS

Protocol was registered on the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews. PRISMA-P guidelines for the conduct of systematic review were followed. Literature search was done in various databases. The inclusion criteria were patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip undergoing rhinoplasty with primary cleft lip repair and preference given to studies comparing the 2 procedures.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were selected based on inclusion criteria after screening 522 articles-1 randomized controlled trial, 2 retrospective cohorts, and 13 case series. Both closed and open techniques have achieved good symmetry of nostrils with no impairment of growth. No advantage of one technique over the other was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies on the subject to arrive at an evidence-based recommendation as to whether open or closed rhinoplasty during primary cleft lip repair gives better long-term outcomes. Due to insufficient evidence, the authors are not able to support or refute the hypothesis put forward in the review.

Primary Overcorrection of the Unilateral Cleft Nasal Deformity: Quantifying the Results

BACKGROUND

Because primary nasal correction by the time of lip repair has been incorporated into the treatment approach, many patients have benefitted from this combined procedure. However, primary nasal correction cannot guarantee an excellent result. Although overcorrection has been mentioned as a treatment rationale of the unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity, a detailed approach and quantitative evidence of the rationale are rare. This study evaluates whether overcorrection in the primary repair results in a quantitative improvement in nasal appearance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, the inclusion criteria were patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent primary lip and nose repair by the age of 3 to 4 months. Primary nasal overcorrection was achieved by application of muscle to septal base suture, alar cinching suture and Tajima reversed U incision method. Patients were further divided into an overcorrected (n = 19) and nonovercorrected group (n = 19). The following parameters were identified on basilar photos of all patients taken at least 12 months after repair, ratios of cleft to noncleft side in each patient were taken and the mean for each parameter calculated: Ac angle (ACA/ACA'), alar height (AH/AH'), alar width (AW/AW'), nostril height (NH/NH`), nostril width (NW/NW'), and columellar deviation from the midline (CD/NW). The means of the overcorrected and nonovercorrected groups were then compared using the t test.

RESULTS

From all investigated measuremens, Alar height (AH/AH': overcorrected, 0.983 to nonovercorrected, 0.941; P = 0.03) and nostril height ratio (NH/NH') (NH/NH': covercorrected, 0.897 to nonovercorrected, 0.680; P = 0.003) showed statistically significant differences favoring the overcorrected group at least 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary nasal overcorrection including muscle to columella base suture, alar cinch suture, and Tajima method resulted in quantitatively more long-term symmetric alae and nostril height compared to nonovercorrected patients.

Primary Septal Cartilage Graft for the Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty

BACKGROUND

Since 2006, the authors have explored the option of using septal cartilage as an alar rim graft on the cleft side during primary rhinoplasty to improve nasal symmetry. The aim of this study was to compare the nasal shape with or without rim graft.

METHODS

A total of 98 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate were included; 39 patients had septal cartilage as the rim graft, and 59 patients did not. Measurements of the nostril height, nostril width, one-fourth medial part of nostril height, nostril area, nasal dome height, and nostril axis were obtained on the cleft and noncleft sides. Ratios of these measurements were calculated. These ratios were then compared between the graft and nongraft groups. The levels of asymmetry were categorized into four levels-less than 5 percent, 5 to 10 percent, 10 to 15 percent, and greater than 15 percent-based on the percentages deviated from perfect symmetry (100 percent). Panel assessment was also performed. Nasolabial angle and tip projection ratio were measured for the comparison of nasal growth.

RESULTS

The nostril height, height-to-width ratio, and nasal dome height were higher in the graft group (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The graft group showed more consistency regarding the nostril shape and axis, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The nasolabial angle and tip projection ratio showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study suggests that the use of a primary septal cartilage graft may offer better support at the alar rim and improve the long-term outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nasal Symmetry Following Primary Correction of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate nasal symmetry using three-dimensional photogrammetry following primary tip rhinoplasty with or without an internal splint in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate.

DESIGN

We captured three-dimensional images of patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate who underwent nasolabial repair by rotation-advancement of the lip and primary tip rhinoplasty, either with or without an internal resorbable splint, and normal control subjects. We assessed nasal symmetry by identifying the plane of maximum symmetry and the root-mean-square deviation between native and reflected surfaces.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

We imaged 38 controls and 38 subjects with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate (20 with, 18 without an internal splint).

RESULTS

Nasal asymmetry root-mean-square deviation clustered between 0.19 and 0.50 mm (median = 0.24 ± 0.08 mm) for controls; whereas, those with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 mm (median = 0.75 ± 0.40 mm). Although root-mean-square deviation ranges overlapped, patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip/palate had significantly greater asymmetry than controls (P < .001). We found no difference in asymmetry between patients with or without an internal splint (P = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional photogrammetry was used to successfully compare symmetry among different patient and control groups. Although "normal" nasal symmetry was attained in some patients following cleft lip/nasal repair, most had persistent asymmetry compared with normal controls. Placement of a resorbable internal splint did not improve symmetry in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate.

Post septorhinoplasty custom-made unilateral nasal stent for nasal cleft deformity

CONTEXT

Nasal cleft deformity is a complicated problem. Utilization of nasal stent in post septorhinoplastyaims at establishing and maintaining airway patency, tissue position, and reduces tissue contracture after surgery.

CASE REPORT

A 16-year-old female patient presented with history of surgical reconstruction of congenital cleft lip and cleft palate with secondary septorhinoplasty of nasal cleft deformity. Patient was referred for nasal stent 1 week after septorhinoplasty. This case report provides a novel technique for fabrication of esthetic nasal stent after postseptorhinoplasty for secondary cleft nose deformity correction.

CONCLUSION

This case report presents a simple, convenient technique for nasal stent fabrication for prevention of restenosis for cleft nose deformity post secondary septorhinoplasty. Provision of nasal stent allows breathing, maintains esthetics, comfort, nasal patency, and contour with minimal discomfort.

Staged rotation advancements provide improved nasal results compared to 1-stage repairs in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate

After an experience of 32 complete bilateral cleft patients treated with staged rotation advancement to lip repairs and McComb nasal corrections during an 8-year period, improved nasal results with columella and lobule of normal dimensions have been noted, and the author feels that this method can be recommended for general use.

Unilateral cleft lip repair

Modern cleft surgery requires four-dimensional and functional anatomic understanding of the cleft (and noncleft) lip, nose, and alveolus. Some techniques for nasolabial repair rely more on precise anatomic geometry, whereas others afford the surgeon a more flexible design. Consistent anthropometry enables accurate assessment and reporting of long-term outcomes; such reports are needed to guide perioperative care, delineate optimal repair principles, and resolve ongoing controversies.

Secondary cleft nasoplasty at primary school age: quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of resorbable plates

BACKGROUND

Secondary cleft nasal deformity in children of primary school age can result in permanent impact to a child's self-esteem. The ideal technique and timing of addressing the deformity remain controversial, as harvest of septal cartilage affects nasal growth and limits future options.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients underwent secondary cleft nasoplasty with resorbable plate placement as a columellar strut. All patients had standardized preoperative and postoperative photographs. Basilar photographs were analyzed for height and width of each nostril, height and width of the nose, and deviation of the nasal tip from midline.

RESULTS

In unilateral clefts, improvements in nostril width, nostril height, tip height, and tip deviation were found to be statistically significant in early postoperative photographs; improvements in nostril height, tip height, and tip deviation remained statistically significant in late photographs. In patients with bilateral clefts, improvements in nostril height and tip height were found to be significant in early postoperative photographs, with improvement in nostril height remaining significant in the long term. Partial plate exposure limited to the columellar base occurred in five patients (9.4 percent), successfully treated in the clinic setting with no loss of nasal tip support.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors provide quantitative data regarding nasal outcomes following secondary cleft nasoplasty using resorbable plates for tip support. Significant long-term improvements in nasal appearance are possible using this technique with minimal complications. In those patients presenting with cleft nasal deformity at primary school age, the use of resorbable plates can improve nasal symmetry and spare native cartilage and thereby reduce the potential for nasal growth disturbance.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Primary unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and nose in an older population

A one-stage procedure to reconstruct complete and incomplete unilateral/bilateral cleft lip and nose deformities is presented. Emphasis was made on closure of the lip muscles, correction of the nostril floor, correction of the alveolar cleft as well as reconstruction of the nose through an intranasal approach, with a supported suture technique for nasal correction. No dental or orthodontic treatment was available or performed in this older population. Emphasis was on primary closure of the muscles, using the rotation advancement principle. The repair that was performed was near anatomical, reconstructing the labial sulcus, the nostril floor, the alveolar cleft and the nasal deformity all in one stage. There was a high level of satisfaction both from the patient's and surgeon's point of view.

Unilateral cleft lip: principles and practice of surgical management

Management of cleft lip and palate requires a unique understanding of the various dimensions of care to optimize outcomes of surgery. The breadth of treatment spans multiple disciplines and the length of treatment spans infancy to adulthood. Although the focus of reconstruction is on form and function, changes occur with growth and development. This review focuses on the surgical management of the primary cleft lip and nasal deformity. In addition to surgical treatment, the anatomy, clinical spectrum, preoperative care, and postoperative care are discussed. Principles of surgery are emphasized and controversies are highlighted.

Lip Height Improvement during the First Year of Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip Repair Using Cutting Extended Mohler Technique

Objective. To compare the cutaneous lip height at early and late postoperative periods and to objectively determine the average amount of lip height improvement during the first year of unilateral complete cleft lip repair using Cutting extended Mohler technique. Methods. In this prospective cohort study, 26 unilateral complete cleft patients and 50 noncleft subjects were included. Photographs were taken between 12 and 16 weeks (T1) and also taken between 12 and 13 months after surgery (T2). The cutaneous lip height distance (photogrammetric lip analysis) obtained in these two periods of time were measured and statistically analyzed. Results. The average lip heights were 24% ± 9% in T1 and 8% ± 6% in T2 (P < 0.01). The average lip height asymmetry in the noncleft individuals was 4.52% ± 1.89%. Conclusion. Since all principles to obtain a symmetrical Cupid's bow were performed, the postoperative pull-up of Cupid's bow is probably owed to the scar contracture, which improves by 2 times during the first year after surgery.

Assessment of nostril symmetry after primary cleft rhinoplasty in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate

The aim of this study was to assess the nostril symmetry following primary cleft rhinoplasty done with either a dorsal onlay or columellar strut graft in patients with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. In this retrospective study 30 consecutive patients treated with autogenous or alloplastic dorsal onlay grafts and 30 consecutive patients treated with autogenous or alloplastic columellar strut grafts for complete unilateral cleft nose reconstruction were analyzed for nasal symmetry. The autogenous grafts used were costo-chondral or septal cartilage and the alloplastic graft used was high density polyethylene (Medpore(®)). Assessment of the nostril symmetry was done using a two-dimensional nasal analysis 24-30 months postoperatively. Ratios between cleft and noncleft side nostril for three parameters were used to assess symmetry namely nostril width, nostril height and nostril gap area. None of the three parameters showed statistically significant changes. A satisfactory, though not statistically significant, difference in symmetrical outcome could be achieved in both the groups with the exception of nostril width symmetry in group treated with dorsal onlay graft.

Correction of unilateral secondary cleft lip nose deformity by a modified Tajima's method and several adjunctive procedures based on severity

BACKGROUND

It is generally accepted that the developmental deficiency of the unilateral perinasal skeleton, cartilages, and skin originates from the secondary cleft nasal deformity. To date, numerous attempts have been made to correct these deformities, but no clinical data are available about the simpler, comprehensive, and patient-customized methods for correction of the secondary cleft nasal deformity. In the correction of Asian patients with secondary cleft nasal deformity, the clinical experience with the simplified Tajima method and several adjunctive procedures based on the severity of the disorder were retrospectively reviewed.

METHODS

During the period January 1982 to May 2009, 197 consecutive patients underwent repair through the modified Tajima method followed by several adjunctive procedures.

RESULTS

These series had no recurrence requiring surgery except for cases in which the nasal ala was depressed to some extent. The mean degree of patient satisfaction as rated on the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIA) was 3.88 ± 0.59.

CONCLUSIONS

Various types of surgical procedures were performed using the modified Tajima method depending on the degree of alar cartilage displacement. These procedures were effective in achieving symmetry of the nasal tip for patients with secondary unilateral cleft lip.

Rhinoplasty for cleft and hemangioma-related nasal deformities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a concise review of recent articles on rhinoplasty approaches for cleft nasal deformity and nasal hemangiomas published in 2008-2010.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cleft nasal deformity rhinoplasty approaches have undergone further refinements as well as new development in techniques and surgical principles to minimize recurrent cleft nasal deformities. There is a paucity of studies addressing cleft septal deformity although there appears to be a greater emphasis on functional outcome in cleft rhinoplasty. Complications from primary cleft rhinoplasty and presurgical nasoalveolar molding were also reported. Similarly, nasal hemangioma rhinoplasty approaches have undergone further modifications with open rhinoplasty and subunit approaches gaining wider acceptance.

SUMMARY

There are several new studies that compare different rhinoplasty techniques to determine which approaches offer superior surgical outcomes; however, there needs to be a greater acceptance of objective measurements when assessing surgical results to identify a uniform surgical protocol and technique for both cleft rhinoplasty and nasal hemangiomas.

Repair of bilateral cleft lip and its variants

The surgeon who lifts a scalpel to repair a bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity is accountable for: 1) precise craftsmanship based on three-dimensional features and four-dimensional changes; 2) periodic assessment throughout the child's growth; and 3) technical modifications during primary closure based on knowledge gained from long-term follow-up evaluation. These children should not have to endure the stares prompted by nasolabial stigmata that result from outdated concepts and technical misadventures. The principles for repair of bilateral complete cleft lip have evolved to such a level that the child's appearance should be equivalent to, or surpass, that of a unilateral complete cleft lip. These same principles also apply to the repair of the variants of bilateral cleft lip, although strategies and execution differ slightly.

Primary septoplasty in the repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess and compare nasal symmetry in patients who underwent correction of a complete unilateral cleft lip using the Afroze incision without and with primary septoplasty using a standardized two-dimensional photographic analysis.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 190 consecutive patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate treated with or without septoplasty using the Afroze incision technique was conducted at a high-volume center. Eighty-two patients operated on without primary septoplasty and 76 patients operated on with primary septoplasty were evaluated. Nasal symmetry was compared between patients using two-dimensional photographic analysis. Ratios between the cleft side and the non–cleft side for five parameters were used to assess symmetry: alar base–to–interpupillary line distance, columella-to–Cupid's bow distance, nostril gap area, nostril width, and nostril height. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate differences between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients operated on with primary septoplasty showed more nasal symmetry compared with patients operated on without septoplasty. This difference was statistically significant for columella-to–Cupid's bow distance, nostril gap area, and nostril height (p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) and for the distance between alar base and the alar base–to–interpupillary line distance (p = 0.145) the difference was present but not statistically significant. For nostril width, no difference was found (p = 0.850).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with primary septoplasty showed better results in terms of nasal symmetry when analyzed using two-dimensional photographic analyses.

An evidence-based approach to secondary cleft lip nasal deformity

The Maintenance of Certification module series is designed to help the clinician structure his or her study in specific areas appropriate to his or her clinical practice. This article is prepared to accompany practice-based assessment of preoperative assessment, anesthesia, surgical treatment plan, perioperative management, and outcomes. In this format, the clinician is invited to compare his or her methods of patient assessment and treatment, outcomes, and complications, with authoritative, information-based references. This information base is then used for self-assessment and benchmarking in parts II and IV of the Maintenance of Certification process of the American Board of Plastic Surgery. This article is not intended to be an exhaustive treatise on the subject. Rather, it is designed to serve as a reference point for further in-depth study by review of the reference articles presented.

Assessment of secondary cleft rhinoplasty using resorbable plates at the age of primary school

BACKGROUND

Secondary rhinoplasty after a cleft lip repair remains a significant challenge. We have developed a technique in which resorbable plates are used to support the cleft alar cartilage to minimize relapse. There are few guidelines by which one can objectively assess the outcome of cleft rhinoplasty over time. This study attempts to demonstrate a means by which the symmetry and form of the proposed rhinoplasty technique can be evaluated.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with unilateral cleft lip/palate repair had a secondary rhinoplasty performed at age 6 to 8 years, using a resorbable plate (resorption time, 2-3 years) placed between the nasal lining and cleft alar cartilage to simulate the shape of the noncleft cartilage. Photographs were taken preoperatively and postoperatively. Median follow-up was 9.6 +/- 2.8 months. Various angles and ratios were measured to demonstrate outcomes, comparing preoperative to postoperative measures, and symmetry between cleft and noncleft sides.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the angle between the horizontal axis, drawn across the alar base and tangent to the alar rim on both sides, was significantly altered (P < 0.001); both sides were closer to 60 degrees (mean, 56.28 degrees), approximating the angle of the aesthetic norm. A measure of the angle between the horizontal axis and a line drawn from midpoint of axis to nasal tip was significantly closer to 90 degrees (P < 0.05). The shape of the affected nostril became more oval and symmetric relative to the unaffected side (P < 0.05). Angle between the horizontal axis and a line drawn through the widest point of each nostril was close to zero. (P < 0.001). The difference in nostril height between the cleft and noncleft sides was significantly decreased (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We have objectively evaluated the outcomes of our technique of secondary cleft rhinoplasty using resorbable plates for alar support. A careful geometric evaluation of preoperative and postoperative photographs can help determine the symmetry and overall quality of the result. These measures may help to evaluate long-term outcomes of cleft rhinoplasty over time.

Nasal tip complications of primary cleft lip nasoplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Complications of primary nasoplasty, at the time of definitive primary cheiloplasty, are underreported in the literature. This study endeavors to examine the occurrences of these complications at our cleft-craniofacial center, in an effort to identify causative factors and management strategies. A case series of patients with postoperative nasal complications after primary cleft lip nasal surgery is presented.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of primary cleft lip nasal repairs was conducted at our cleft-craniofacial center between January 2003 and December 2007. Consecutive cases of 3 staff surgeons were evaluated. Specific data points included number and type of complications, subsequent required interventions, and relevant history, with particular attention paid to the details of the primary nasoplasty.

RESULTS

Eighty-six primary cleft lip nasoplasties were completed between the years 2003 and 2007. Six complications (6.9%) related to the primary cleft lip nasoplasty were identified. Four patients (4.6%) experienced nasal tip infections; all 4 required surgical drainage. Twenty-four patients (27.9%) undergoing primary cleft lip and nose repair had postoperative nostril conformers placed, and 2 (8.3%) of them experienced complications deemed conformer related.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative nasal complications of primary cheiloplasty occur and are likely underreported. In this series, complications resulted from infection, often occurring late, and secondary to the use of nostril conformers. Surgeon awareness and caregiver education, to identify the early signs of postoperative nasal complications, are critical to the successful treatment of these occurrences. Although this study did not intend on examining antibiotic use, the significance of nasal tip infections might support the regular use of antibiotics in this population, and the use of postoperative nostril conformers must be followed closely.

Analysis of the cleft lip-nose in the submental-vertical view. Part II. Panel study: which is the most important deformity?

BACKGROUND

In part I, we presented an anthropometric measurement instrument that uses standardized facial pictures in the submental-vertical view, Adobe Photoshop 7.0, and Scion Software for Windows to determine both form and symmetry of the cleft nose. This instrument was found to be both reliable and universally suitable for comparing results of cleft rhinoplasties. However, the quality of the overall result needs to be based on weights assigned to different measurable parameters/deformities. Therefore, we carried out a panel study to evaluate the relative importance of the different parameters/deformities according to the parents of the patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire with both pictorial and textual representations of 10 distinct nasal cleft deformities was sent twice to the parents of 14 complete unilateral and 14 complete bilateral cleft lip-nose patients. The deformities were rank-ordered by the parents, and the responses were analyzed for intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities.

RESULTS

The most important deformity according to both groups was the asymmetric position of the nose within the facial frame. Alar position was also important whereas nostril form was least important. There was fair test reliability for both intraobserver and interobserver rankings.

CONCLUSION

Rankings of the different nasal cleft deformities by the parents of cleft patients are reproducible and, hence, a useful preparatory guide for surgeons.

Countercurve placement of conchal cartilage grafts used for correction of nasal tip deformities

A novel, straightforward technique which we have used in 7 patients and developed over the past 2 years is presented for help with the correction of nasal tip deformities, lack of nasal tip projection, and dome symmetry using conchal cartilage. Procedures to correct these problems include, but are not limited to, early open rhinoplasties with direct suturing techniques, grafting with cartilage, mobilization of the nasal cartilage, and nasoalveolar molding. We present a simple technique utilizing mature conchal cartilage as a columella strut with a lateral extension that curves over the misshapen side. Using the graft in a unique countercurve placement takes advantage of the structural memory intrinsic to mature cartilage and uses this springlike property to enhance tip projection and support lower lateral cartilage. The keys are (1) adequate mobilization of the nasal cartilage, (2) careful dissection of the pocket, (3) countercurve placement of the conchal cartilage.

Statistical evaluation of the cleft lip nose deformity image

Cleft lip is a congenital deformity condition with separation of the two sides of the lip and causes nose deformity. Evaluation of surgical corrections and assessment of prognosis in nose deformity depend mainly on doctor's subjective judgment. Development of an objective assessment tool in evaluation of the cleft lip nose deformity patients will help in advancement and evaluation of surgical techniques. Therefore, our study aimed on quantitative assessment of a cleft lip nose deformity by comparing following parameters gathered from a photographic image of a cleft lip patient: (1) angle difference between two nostril axes, (2) center of the nostril and distance between two centers, (3) overlapped area of two nostrils and (4) the overlapped area ratio of two nostrils. Assessment results of the nose deformity were statistically analyzed with evaluation results from three highly experienced plastic surgeons. In addition, regression model was developed using correlation relationship and factor analysis of parameters from the results of image analysis.

Analysis of the cleft-lip nose in submental-vertical view, Part I--reliability of a new measurement instrument

BACKGROUND

Objective evaluation of nasal form and symmetry in cleft patients is difficult. The aim of this study was to establish a computer analysis of nasal form and symmetry (intranasal symmetry and symmetrical position of the nose), in order to evaluate primary and secondary cleft rhinoplasty outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Indirect anthropometric measurements were performed on digital photographs processed by Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, California) with the help of Scion Image software (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA). For assessing intranasal symmetry, the ratio of nasal tip projection to total nasal width, the ratio of nostril widths, the ratio of nostril heights, the ratio of mid-alar widths and nostril symmetry were determined. Bifidity of the nose, columellar deviation and angulations of the nostrils were also measured. For assessing the symmetrical position of the nose, the ratio of the distances of alar points to the endocanthial lines and nasal base inclination were determined. The reliability of this analysis was tested by using submento-vertical photographs of bilateral cleft noses, of which the lips were primarily operated on by different techniques and different surgeons in Zurich and Bruges.

RESULTS

There were highly significant intraobserver (ICC=0.994) and interobserver reliabilities (ICC=0.893).

CONCLUSION

This nasal analysis is appropriate for comparing results of different surgical techniques.

Initial management of total nasal septectomy defects using resorbable plating

Temporary reconstruction of the nasal skeleton using resorbable plating offers several advantages in management of carefully selected patients undergoing septectomy. These include protection against early soft tissue contracture, lack of interference with postoperative radiation and surveillance imaging, ease of use, and reversibility. This strategy can yield a good functional result and acceptable cosmesis during radiotherapy and a period of surveillance prior to definitive reconstruction. Herein, we describe the use of resorbable plating material for temporary nasal support in staged reconstruction of complex nasal skeletal defects. We managed near-total defects of the nasal cartilaginous and bony skeleton after cancer resection by staged reconstruction, initially using resorbable plating material to provide temporary structural support for nasal soft tissue during a 1-year period of postresection surveillance. The resorbable reconstruction provided adequate support to maintain nasal patency and external contour for a year or more, allowing early return to normal activities. Partial extrusion occurred in a patient who continued heavy smoking.

The elevation of the constructed auricle with a temporoparietal fascial flap wrapping a resorbable plate

During the second stage reconstruction of the auricle in patients with microtia, we modified Nagata's method and two technical improvements were possible. After the implanted auricle was separated from the bed, we harvested the temporoparietal fascial flap through helical rim incision instead of incising the temporal scalp. So the surgical scar over the temporal region was avoided. Thereafter, a costal cartilage wedge was carved and grafted to the posterior aspect of the conchal region to get a firm projection. But in cases of unavailable costal cartilage wedge graft, we used a resorbable plate composed of polylactic and polyglycolic acid as a substitute for the former so that we could create firm elevation and sufficient ear projection. Between June 2002 and May 2004, 28 patients underwent this operation with the temporoparietal fascial flap and resorbable plating system. There was no complication resulting from our technique. It was possible to create firm elevation and good frontal projection even if there was no available cartilage wedge. Additionally, by harvesting the temporoparietal fascia through helical rim incision, we avoid creating additional scars on the scalp.

Bilateral cleft lip

The surgeon's objectives are normal nasolabial appearance and normal speech. The principles for synchronous repair of bilateral cleft lip have been established, and the techniques continue to evolve. Primary repair impairs maxillary growth, but little can be done at this time except to practice gentle craftsmanship and to minimize tension on the lower labial closure. The cutaneous lip should never be reopened for revision, and the number of secondary procedures involving the nasal cartilages should be kept to a minimum. Many adolescents with repaired bilateral cleft lip need maxillary advancement to improve projection of the nasal tip, to protrude the upper lip, and to attain normal sagittal skeletal harmony. With expected improvements in the technology of distraction osteogenesis, maxillary advancement may someday become as acceptable as orthodontic treatment.

Repair of bilateral cleft lip: review, revisions, and reflections

Rarely does the appearance of a child with a repaired bilateral cleft lip compare favorably with that of a child with a repaired unilateral cleft lip. However, there has been a major change in operative strategy during the past decade, and as a result, the typical bilateral cleft nasolabial stigmata are no longer so obvious. The senior author restates the principles for correction of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity, and underscores the essential role of preoperative premaxillary positioning. He reviews his method of single-stage closure of the cleft primary palate, including three-dimensional adjustments based on predicted four-dimensional changes. Operative modifications are described for variations of bilateral cleft lip. The authors emphasize the surgeon's obligation for periodic assessment. In a consecutive series of 50 patients with repaired bilateral complete cleft lip/palate, the revision-rate was 33% as compared with 12.5% if the secondary palate is intact. No revisions were necessary for philtral size or columellar length. The authors propose that nasolabial appearance and speech are the priorities in habilitation of the child with bilateral cleft lip/palate rather than the traditional emphasis on maxillary growth.