Secretin receptors in human pancreatic membranes

Secretin Receptor as a Target in Gastrointestinal Cancer: Expression Analysis and Ligand Development

Secretin was originally discovered as a gastrointestinal peptide that stimulates fluid secretion from the pancreas and liver and delays gastric emptying. In disease, a secretin receptor (SCTR) was found to occur as a splice variant in gastrinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of SCTR has been described for gastrinomas, carcinoid tumors of the lung and cholangiocarcinoma. SCTR therefore is considered a candidate target for molecular tumor imaging as well as for peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) in a number of oncological indications. The aim of this study was to characterize SCTR expression in esophageal and pancreatic cancer, demonstrating for the first time high SCTR overexpression in these tumor types. In total, 65 of 70 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissues stained strongly positive for SCTR in immunohistochemistry, as did most of the 151 esophageal cancer samples, with minor influence of grading in both entities. In addition, the aim of this study was to further delineate residues in human secretin that are critical for binding to and activation of human SCTR. For a potential development of short and metabolically stable analogs for clinical use, it was intended to probe the peptide for its capacity to incorporate deletions and substitutions without losing its affinity to SCTR. In a systematic approach, a library of 146 secretin variants containing single amino acid substitutions as well as truncations on either end was tested in β-arrestin2-GFP translocation and fluorescent ligand internalization assays employing high-content analysis, in cAMP assays which run in agonist and antagonist mode, and in radioligand binding. The main structural determinants of SCTR binding and activation were localized to the N-terminus, with His1, Asp3 being among the most sensitive positions, followed by Phe6, Thr7 and Leu10. Aminoterminal truncation caused a rapid decline in receptor activity and most of these variants proved to be partial agonists showing antagonistic properties. In this study, the most potent novel antagonist showed an IC50 of 309 ± 74 nM in the β-arrestin2-GFP translocation assay on human SCTR while remaining a weak partial agonist. Future studies will have to demonstrate the utility of further enhanced secretin analogues as tracers for in vivo imaging and therapy.

Rational development of a high-affinity secretin receptor antagonist

The secretin receptor is a prototypic class B GPCR with substantial and broad pharmacologic importance. The aim of this project was to develop a high affinity selective antagonist as a new and important pharmacologic tool and to aid stabilization of this receptor in an inactive conformation for ultimate structural characterization. Amino-terminal truncation of the natural 27-residue ligand reduced biological activity, but also markedly reduced binding affinity. This was rationally and experimentally overcome with lactam stabilization of helical structure and with replacement of residues with natural and unnatural amino acids. A key new step in this effort was the replacement of peptide residue Leu²² with L-cyclohexylalanine (Cha) to enhance potential hydrophobic interactions with receptor residues Leu³¹, Val³⁴, and Phe⁹² that were predicted from molecular modeling. Alanine-replacement mutagenesis of these residues markedly affected ligand binding and biological activity. The optimal antagonist ligand, (Y¹⁰,c[E¹⁶,K²⁰],I¹⁷,Cha²²,R²⁵)sec(6-27), exhibited high binding affinity (4 nM), similar to natural secretin, and exhibited no demonstrable biological activity to stimulate cAMP accumulation, intracellular calcium mobilization, or β-arrestin-2 translocation. It acts as an orthosteric competitive antagonist, predicted to bind within the peptide-binding groove in the receptor extracellular domain. The analogous peptide that was one residue longer, retaining Thr⁵, exhibited partial agonist activity, while further truncation of even a single residue (Phe⁶) reduced binding affinity. This sec(6-27)-based peptide will be an important new tool for pharmacological and structural studies.

Predicting the effects of amino acid replacements in peptide hormones on their binding affinities for class B GPCRs and application to the design of secretin receptor antagonists

Computational prediction of the effects of residue changes on peptide-protein binding affinities, followed by experimental testing of the top predicted binders, is an efficient strategy for the rational structure-based design of peptide inhibitors. In this study we apply this approach to the discovery of competitive antagonists for the secretin receptor, the prototypical member of class B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Proteins in this family are involved in peptide hormone-stimulated signaling and are implicated in several human diseases, making them potential therapeutic targets. We first validated our computational method by predicting changes in the binding affinities of several peptides to their cognate class B GPCRs due to alanine replacement and compared the results with previously published experimental values. Overall, the results showed a significant correlation between the predicted and experimental ΔΔG values. Next, we identified candidate inhibitors by applying this method to a homology model of the secretin receptor bound to an N-terminal truncated secretin peptide. Predictions were made for single residue replacements to each of the other nineteen naturally occurring amino acids at peptide residues within the segment binding the receptor N-terminal domain. Amino acid replacements predicted to most enhance receptor binding were then experimentally tested by competition-binding assays. We found two residue changes that improved binding affinities by almost one log unit. Furthermore, a peptide combining both of these favorable modifications resulted in an almost two log unit improvement in binding affinity, demonstrating the approximately additive effect of these changes on binding. In order to further investigate possible physical effects of these residue changes on receptor binding affinity, molecular dynamics simulations were performed on representatives of the successful peptide analogues (namely A17I, G25R, and A17I/G25R) in bound and unbound forms. These simulations suggested that a combination of the α-helical propensity of the unbound peptide and specific interactions between the peptide and the receptor extracellular domain contribute to their higher binding affinities.

Lactam constraints provide insights into the receptor-bound conformation of secretin and stabilize a receptor antagonist

The natural ligands for family B G protein-coupled receptors are moderate-length linear peptides having diffuse pharmacophores. The amino-terminal regions of these ligands are critical for biological activity, with their amino-terminal truncation leading to production of orthosteric antagonists. The carboxyl-terminal regions of these peptides are thought to occupy a ligand-binding cleft within the disulfide-bonded amino-terminal domains of these receptors, with the peptides in amphipathic helical conformations. In this work, we have characterized the binding and activity of a series of 11 truncated and lactam-constrained secretin(5-27) analogues at the prototypic member of this family, the secretin receptor. One peptide in this series with lactam connecting residues 16 and 20 [c[E(16),K(20)][Y(10)]sec(5-27)] improved the binding affinity of its unconstrained parental peptide 22-fold while retaining the absence of endogenous biological activity and competitive antagonist characteristics. Homology modeling with molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations established that this constrained peptide occupies the ligand-binding cleft in an orientation similar to that of natural full-length secretin and provided insights into why this peptide was more effective than other truncated conformationally constrained peptides in the series. This lactam bridge is believed to stabilize an extended α-helical conformation of this peptide while in solution and not to interfere with critical residue-residue approximations while docked to the receptor.

Importance of each residue within secretin for receptor binding and biological activity

Secretin is a linear 27-residue peptide hormone that stimulates pancreatic and biliary ductular bicarbonate and water secretion by acting at its family B G protein-coupled receptor. While, like other family members, the carboxyl-terminal region of secretin is most important for high affinity binding and its amino-terminal region is most important for receptor selectivity and receptor activation, determinants for these activities are distributed throughout the entire length of this peptide. In this work, we have systematically investigated changing each residue within secretin to alanine and evaluating the impact on receptor binding and biological activity. The residues most critical for receptor binding were His1, Asp3, Gly4, Phe6, Thr7, Ser8, Leu10, Asp15, Leu19, and Leu23. The residues most critical for biological activity included His1, Gly4, Thr7, Ser8, Glu9, Leu10, Leu19, Leu22, and Leu23, with Asp3, Phe6, Ser11, Leu13, Asp15, Leu26, and Val27 also contributing. While the importance of residues in positions analogous to His1, Asp3, Phe6, Thr7, and Leu23 is conserved for several closely related members of this family, Leu19 is uniquely important for secretin. We, therefore, have further studied this residue by molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations. Indeed, the molecular dynamics simulations showed that mutation of Leu19 to alanine was destabilizing, with this effect greater than that observed for the analogous position in the other close family members. This could reflect reduced contact with the receptor or an increase in the solvent-accessible surface area of the hydrophobic residues in the carboxyl terminus of secretin as bound to its receptor.

Secretin: Should we revisit its metabolic outcomes?

Metabolic pathologies such as Type 2 Diabetes have become a major health problem for worldwide populations. Unfortunately, efforts to cure and especially to prevent these significant global problems have so far been met with disappointment. Recently, the involvement of the gut-derived hormonal dysregulation in the development of obesity-related disturbances has been intensively studied. For instance, studies of gut-derived peptides such as peptide YY 3-36, glucagon-like peptide-1, oxyntomodulin and, more recently, ghrelin have significantly improved our understanding of mechanisms underlying weight and metabolic regulation. Even though early reports of the existence of secretin, the first peptide hormone to be described, date back as far as 1825, so much and yet so little is still known about its physiological role in mammals, including humans. However, recent years have provided a better understanding of how the release of secretin is regulated by enteral secretagogues. On the other hand, most basic questions about its role in the post-prandial regulation of metabolic functions in normal and pathophysiological conditions remain to be elucidated. The present work intends to review the physiology of secretin along with its central and peripheral outcomes on metabolic functions.

Control of pancreatic secretion in humans

Studies on the control of pancreatic secretion in humans of all ages have been a difficult task over the years because of patients' availability and ethic committee rules. Nevertheless, studies were performed and the objectives of this review are to summarize our knowledge on the development of secretory process in newborns, on the different phases of the pancreatic responses to a meal, on the pancreatic responses to the different components of the diet, on the mechanisms involved in the control of the pancreatic responses, and finally on the receptors involved in these controls.

Secretin receptors in normal and diseased human pancreas: marked reduction of receptor binding in ductal neoplasia

Receptors for gut hormones, which are often overexpressed in cancer, are clinically relevant for receptor-targeted tumor imaging and therapy. Because the receptors for the gut hormone secretin are poorly characterized, we assessed secretin receptor expression in the main secretin target, the human pancreas. We investigated 58 non-neoplastic pancreases and 55 pancreatic tumors for receptor localization and density by in vitro receptor autoradiography using [(125)I]Tyr(10) rat secretin and for secretin receptor mRNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Secretin receptors were highly expressed in non-neoplastic ducts and lobuli and also in lower amounts in ductal neoplasias, including ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous tumors, and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction revealed wild-type receptor mRNA in the non-neoplastic pancreas and both wild-type and spliced variant receptor transcripts in ductal adenocarcinomas. Serous cystic tumors were highly positive for secretin receptors, whereas mucinous cystic tumors were negative. This study is the first to describe the precise secretin receptor distribution in human non-neoplastic pancreas and various pancreatic tumors. High secretin receptor expression in the non-neoplastic ducts reflects the major role of secretin in bicarbonate secretion. Reduced secretin binding in pancreatic ductal tumors may relate to (alternatively spliced) secretin receptor isoforms. Thus, secretin receptors in pancreatic tumors may represent potential clinical targets.

Differential activation of adenylate cyclase by secretin and VIP receptors in the calf pancreas

OBJECTIVE

Secretin is a key regulator of pancreatic secretion, but the molecular basis of its action is not well understood, especially in the calf pancreas. Our study investigated the expression and functional competence of secretin receptors (SEC-R) in calf pancreatic membranes.

METHODS

We used reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, sequencing, and Northern blot to assess the expression of the SEC-R gene. The functional characterization of SEC-R was accomplished using adenylate cyclase (AC) assay.

RESULTS

We successfully amplified, by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, a fragment of the SEC-R gene from 119-day-old calf pancreas. This sequence shows higher homology with SEC-R than with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-1 and VIP-2 receptors from other species. Northern blot analysis detected a 1.8-kb transcript. Accordingly, secretin stimulates AC activity in calf pancreatic membranes isolated from 28- and 119-day-old animals with a potency (Ka) of 1.9 to 2.7 nmol/L. Maximal AC stimulation induced by secretin represented a 3- to 4-fold increase of basal activity. AC activation by secretin was inhibited by the 2 SEC-R antagonists, [psi4,5] secretin (l micromol/L) and [5-27] secretin (10 micromol/L). Interestingly, [psi4,5] secretin was ineffective against VIP-induced AC stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that secretin exerts a direct action on pancreatic secretion through specific SEC-R coupled to the AC system. Calf pancreatic SEC-Rs are coexpressed with VIP-2 receptors that we previously identified by ligand binding and cross-linking experiments.

Human VPAC1 receptor selectivity filter. Identification of a critical domain for restricting secretin binding

The human VPAC1 receptor for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) belongs to the class II family of G protein coupled receptors with seven transmembrane segments. It recognizes several VIP-related peptides and displays a very low affinity for secretin despite >70% homology between VIP and secretin. Conversely, the human secretin receptor has high affinity for secretin but low affinity for VIP. We took advantage of this reversed selectivity to identify a domain of the VPAC1 receptor responsible for selectivity toward secretin by constructing human VPAC1-secretin receptor chimeras. A first set of chimeras consisted of exchanging the entire N-terminal ectodomain or large parts of this domain. They were constructed by overlap PCR, transfected in COS-7 cells, and their ligand selectivity, expressed as the ratio of EC(50) for secretin/EC(50) for VIP (referred to as S/V), in stimulating cAMP production was measured. Two very informative chimeras respectively referred to as S144V and S123V were obtained by replacing the entire ectodomain or only the first 123 amino acids of the VPAC1 receptor by the corresponding sequences of the secretin receptor. Whereas S144V no longer discriminated between VIP and secretin (S/V = 1.2), S123V discriminated between the two peptides (S/V = 300) in the same manner as the wild-type VPAC1 receptor. The motif responsible for discrimination was determined by introducing small blocks or individual amino acids of secretin receptor in the 123-144 sequence of the S123V chimera. The data obtained from 14 new chimeras sustained that two nonadjacent pairs of amino acids, Gln(135) Thr(136) and Gly(140) Ser(141) in the C-terminal end of the N-terminal VPAC1 receptor ectodomain constitute a selective filter that strongly restricts access of secretin to the VPAC1 receptor.

How cystic fibrosis affects pancreatic ductal bicarbonate secretion

Pancreatic bicarbonate secretion is impaired in patients with cystic fibrosis. This article reviews recent advances in bicarbonate dependent transporters in pancreatic duct cells and discusses their regulation in cystic fibrosis.

Molecular cloning and in vitro properties of the recombinant rabbit secretin receptor

The rabbit secretion receptor cDNA was cloned from rabbit pancreas using combined polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/rapid amplification of cDNA ends (PCR/RACE) approaches. The rabbit cDNA encoded 445 amino acids and had 80 and 85% homology with rat- and human receptor, respectively, in terms of nucleic and amino acid sequences. Several regions where the rabbit receptor sequence diverged from the rat/human receptor sequences were observed in the putative extracellular domains of the receptor. A cDNA coding for a similar sequence with a 76 bp deletion after the 5th transmembrane domain was also found; it probably encoded an inactive protein. The whole rabbit secretin receptor cDNA was subcloned in expression vector pCR3.1, then stably and transiently transfected in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The pharmacological properties of the rat and rabbit secretin receptor studies were compared by radiolabeled secretin binding, binding inhibition, and adenylate cyclase activation (using secretin analogs and fragments). Porcine secretin was equipotent with rabbit secretin on the rabbit secretin receptor, but fivefold more potent than rabbit secretin on the rat receptor. This was due to the serine-->arginine residue replacement, in position 16 of rabbit secretin. Amino terminal modified secretin analogs (secretin (2-27), [E3]secretin, [N3]secretin) and VIP were less potent than secretin on both secretin receptors, but more potent on the rabbit than on the rat receptor. The carboxy-terminally truncated fragment (1-26) had the same reduced potency on rat and rabbit receptors. Thus, the rabbit secretin receptor had original properties, different from those of the rat receptor.

Expression of receptors for gut peptides in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour-free pancreas

Gut hormones that modulate the growth of normal pancreas may also modulate the growth of cancers originating from pancreas. This study visualized and compared the receptors for cholecystokinin (CCK), bombesin (BBS), secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in tumour-free tissue sections of human pancreas (n = 10) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (n = 12) with storage phosphor autoradiography using radioligands. CCK-B receptors, present in control pancreata, were not detected in any of the pancreatic cancers. BBS receptors were visualized in control pancreata, but they were absent in 10 of 12 pancreatic cancers. In 5 of 12 pancreatic cancers, receptors for secretin were visualized, while binding for secretin was present in all tumour-free pancreata. Conversely, no specific binding of VIP was detected in control pancreata but was identified in 3 of 12 pancreatic cancer specimens. It is concluded that the expression of gut peptide receptors in pancreatic cancer differs from that in tumour-free pancreas. Receptors for these peptides are present in only a minority of pancreatic cancer specimens.

Glucagon-like peptide-1-(9-36) amide is a major metabolite of glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide after in vivo administration to dogs, and it acts as an antagonist on the pancreatic receptor

This study assesses the importance of metabolites formed following exogenous administration of glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide (GLP-1). After subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of GLP-1 to dogs the plasma immunoreactivity of GLP-1 measured by two different radioimmunoassays (RIAs) were higher than that measured by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This discrepancy was due to the formation of the metabolites GLP-1-(9-36) amide, GLP-1-(7-35) and GLP-1-(7-34). Receptor binding studies using baby hamster kidney cells expressing the human pancreatic GLP-1 receptor showed that the affinity of GLP-1-(9-36) amide, GLP-1-(7-35) and GLP-1-(7-34) was 0.95%, 12% and 2.8%, respectively, of the affinity of GLP-1-(7-36) amide. Furthermore, GLP-1-(9-36) amide was shown to be an antagonist to adenylyl cyclase activity, whereas GLP-1-(7-35) and GLP-1-(7-34) were shown to be agonists. GLP-1-(9-36) amide was shown to be present in vivo in amounts up to 10-fold that of GLP-1-(7-36) amide. Due to its low binding affinity, this antagonistic metabolite does not seem to be able to cause physiological antagonism upon s.c. administration of the peptide.

Effect of introduction of an arginine16 in VIP, PACAP and secretin on ligand affinity for the receptors

Rabbit secretin, which differs from all other mammalian secretins in having a Leu residue in position 6 (instead of Phe) and a basic residue (Arg) in position 16, had a lower affinity than porcine secretion on recombinant rat secretin receptors but had a greater affinity than porcine secretin on recombinant rat VIP1 and PACAP I receptors. Synthetic [L6] porcine secretin had a reduced potency on secretin and VIP1 receptors whereas [R16] porcine secretin had a similar binding profile as rabbit secretin. Thus, an arginine residue in position 16 reduced 3-fold the affinity of secretin for secretin receptors but increased 30-fold its affinity for the VIP1 and PACAP I receptors. The introduction of an arginine residue in position 16, instead of glutamine, in VIP and PACAP had a similar effect: [R16] VIP and [R16] PACAP had 3- to 10-fold higher affinities than VIP and PACAP for VIP1 and PACAP I receptors, and 3-fold lower affinities for the secretin receptors. The three [R16] peptides also had a reduced potency on the chimeric receptor consisting of the N-terminal part of the secretin receptor grafted on the VIP1 receptor, and an enhanced potency on the chimeric receptor consisting of the N-terminal part of VIP1 receptor grafted on the secretin receptor, indicating that position 16 of each ligand interacted with the N-terminal extracellular domain of the receptors.

Adenylate cyclase activity in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines

CONCLUSION

BxPC-3, Hs 766T, Capan-2, Panc-1, and Capan-1 cells possess receptors for VIP and beta-adrenergic agonists that are functionally coupled to adenylate cyclase. In this respect, they resemble pancreatic duct cells. However, we speculate that the process of neoplastic transformation has either downregulated the expression of secretin receptors or led to a defect in the receptor itself, placing a question mark over the usefulness of these adenocarcinoma cell lines as models of the pancreatic ductal epithelium

BACKGROUND

Because of the importance of ducts in pancreatic disease, we wished to establish which duct cells receptors are functional on adenocarcinoma cell lines.

METHODS

We investigated the expression of agonist-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in six human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. Known stimulants of pancreatic ductal secretion, VIP, PHI, secretin, beta-adrenergic, and dopamine, were tested.

RESULTS

For responsive cell lines, VIP was the most effective stimulant followed by adrenaline, isoprenaline, PHI, and secretin. Dopamine was without effect. Since high concentrations of PHI and secretin were required to stimulate cyclase activity, their effect is probably mediated by VIP receptors. Based on the degree of stimulation observed with the individual agonist, Hs 766T and BxPC-3 were the most responsive cell lines, followed by Capan-2 and Capan-1, and finally Panc-1. MIAPaCa-2 cells did not respond to any of the agonists tested.

Intrinsic photoaffinity labeling of native and recombinant rat pancreatic secretin receptors

BACKGROUND

Structural characterization of pancreatic secretin receptors has been limited by difficulties in generating suitable radioligands and obtaining sufficient substrate. The aims of this study were to design, synthesize, and characterize high affinity radiolabeled analogues of secretin suitable for "intrinsic" photoaffinity labeling and to clone, express, and characterize the recombinant rat pancreatic secretin receptor.

METHODS

The ability of synthetic analogues to stimulate amylase secretion by pancreatic acini was studied. Receptor complementary DNA (cDNA) was cloned by screening a rat pancreatic library with a probe based on the sequence of a neural cell secretin-binding protein. Competition binding and affinity labeling were performed with membranes prepared from rat pancreas and transfected cells.

RESULTS

Two probes were fully efficacious secretagogues, which bound in a specific, high-affinity, rapid, and temperature-dependent manner. Only ([125I]Tyr10, pNO2-Phe22) rat secretin 27 covalently labeled a 50,000-62,000-molecular weight pancreatic membrane protein, with labeling inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by secretin but not vasoactive intestinal polypeptide. Hybridization screening yielded a full-length cDNA identical to the neural clone. Photoaffinity labeling of this recombinant receptor identified a 57,000-62,000-molecular weight protein with specificity similar to that of native pancreas. Both native and recombinant receptors migrated at a molecular weight of 42,000 after endoglycosidase F deglycosylation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence for the molecular identity of the pancreatic secretin receptor and presents a novel probe important in structural characterization of its agonist-binding domain.

Neuroanatomical and physiological evidence for the involvement of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the regulation of the distal lobe of the frog pituitary

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) is a 38 amino-acid peptide which belongs to the glucagon/secretin/vasoactive intestinal peptide superfamily. The sequence of PACAP is identical in all mammalian species studied so far but frog PACAP differs by one amino-acid from mammalian PACAP. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of PACAP in the hypothalamo-pituitary complex of the frog Rana ribibunda and to determine the biological activity of frog PACAP on homologous pituitary cells. The distribution of PACAP-containing neurons and fibers was examined by the indirect immunofluorescence method using an antiserum raised against the N-terminal region of the peptide. In the hypothalamus, PACAP-immunoreactive perikarya were localized in the preoptic nucleus and the dorsal and ventral infundibular nuclei. Beaded nerve fibers were observed coursing from the ventral infundibular nucleus to the external vascular layer of the median eminence. A dense network of immunoreactive axons terminated in the vicinity of the capillaries of the hypophysial portal system. The neurointermediate lobe and the distal lobe of the pituitary were devoid of immunoreactive elements. The amount of PACAP-like immunoreactive material in hypothalamus extracts was measured by radioimmunoassay; the apparent concentration of PACAP was 4.5 ng/mg protein. Synthetic frog PACAP38 and PACAP27 induced a similar dose-dependent stimulation of cAMP production in isolated frog distal lobe pituitary fragments (ED50 = 2 x 10(-8) M). At the maximum dose tested (5 x 10(-6) M), both frog PACAP38 and PACAP27 produced a 4-fold increase in cAMP production.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antagonistic properties are shifted back to agonistic properties by further N-terminal shortening of pituitary adenylate-cyclase-activating peptides in human neuroblastoma NB-OK-1 cell membranes

N-terminally shortened analogs of the 27-amino-acid and 38-amino-acid forms of the pituitary-adenylate-cyclase-activating neuropeptide, PACAP(1-27) and PACAP(1-38), were synthesized by a solid-phase method. Systematic deletion of the first 13 amino acids of both PACAP was tested by evaluating their ability to occupy the specific and selective PACAP receptor of human neuroblastoma NB-OK-1 cell membranes and to stimulate adenylate cyclase or, when inactive per se, to inhibit PACAP-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. For each peptide, the Kact (concentration required for half-maximal adenylate cyclase activation) or Ki [concentration required to shift the dose/response curve of PACAP(1-27) twofold to the right] was in good agreement with the corresponding IC50 [concentration inhibiting 50% of 125I-[AcHis1]PACAP(1-27) binding to membranes], suggesting interaction with the same homogeneous class of adenylate cyclase-coupled receptors. The deletion of the two first amino acids (His1 and Ser2) sufficed to decrease the affinity for receptors and to suppress the capacity to activate adenylate cyclase. The shorter fragments 3-27 and 3-38, 4-27 and 4-38, 5-27 and 5-38, 6-27 and 6-38, 7-27 and 7-38, 8-27 and 8-38, and 9-27 and 9-38 were all competitive antagonists of PACAP(1-27)-stimulated activity with the N-terminally shortened PACAP(1-38) derivatives being 4-30-fold more potent than the equivalent PACAP(1-27) derivatives. In this group PACAP(6-38) was the most potent antagonist (Ki 1.5 nM). Surprisingly, the N-terminally shorter fragments 10-27 and 10-38, 11-27 and 11-38, 12-27 and 12-38, 13-27 and 13-38, and 14-27 and 14-38 were again able to stimulate adenylate cyclase, the smallest fragments, PACAP(14-27) and PACAP(14-38), being the most potent and efficient (Kact 2 microM and 0.1 microM, respectively). In this group of agonists, PACAP(1-38) derivatives deleted at the N-terminus were also more potent than the equivalent PACAP(1-27) derivatives.

Structural requirements for the occupancy of pituitary adenylate-cyclase-activating-peptide (PACAP) receptors and adenylate cyclase activation in human neuroblastoma NB-OK-1 cell membranes. Discovery of PACAP(6-38) as a potent antagonist

In these structure activity studies, the 46 analogs of the 27-amino-acid form of the pituitary-adenylate-cyclase-activating peptide, PACAP(1-27), and the 38-amino-acid form, PACAP(1-38), were either monosubstituted or bisubstituted at positions 1-3, 20 and 21 or N-terminally shortened. All analogs were compared on human neuroblastoma NB-OK-1 cell membranes for their ability to occupy 125I-[AcHis1]PACAP(1-27)-labelled receptors (AcHis, N alpha-acetylhistidine) and to activate adenylate cyclase (in terms of potency and intrinsic activity). The monophasic slope of dose/effect curves on both parameters suggested interaction with one class of PACAP receptor. Residues 28-38 in the C-terminally extended peptide, PACAP(1-38), played a favorable role in recognition, in that receptors coupled to adenylate cyclase were, in general, more sensitive to PACAP(1-38) analogs than to the corresponding PACAP(1-27) analogs. At variance with PACAP(6-27), PACAP(6-38) was well recognized and acted as a potent competitive antagonist (Ki 1.5 nM). Residues 1-3 were all important in enzyme activation: modification of the beta-turn potential gave full agonists (the LAla2 and DAla2 derivatives) or partial agonists (LPhe2 and DPhe2; LArg2 and DArg2; Glu3 and Asn3). Finally, a proper alpha-helix was also important: the combined substitution of Lys21/Lys22 by Gly21/Gly22 decreased the binding affinity sharply.

The activation of adenylate cyclase by pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) via helodermin-preferring VIP receptors in human SUP-T1 lymphoblastic membranes

Competition binding curves, using [125I-acetyl-His1]PACAP-27 as radioligand and dose-effect curves of adenylate cyclase activation in human SUP-T1 lymphoblastic membranes showed that PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 stimulate the enzyme through a single class of helodermin-preferring VIP receptors with the following order of potency: helodermin = [acetyl-His1]PACAP-27 greater than PACAP-38 greater than PACAP-27 greater than VIP. PACAP (6-27) (Ki 0.5-0.8 microM) and [Des-His1, Asn3]PACAP-27 (Ki 1-2 microM) acted as competitive antagonists. Using a series of 13 PACAP-27 analogues and fragments and three VIP analogues, we identified positions 1, 2, 3, 9 and 13 in PACAP-27 as being of importance for high-affinity binding. Thus, we added further evidence for considering that the present helodermin-preferring VIP receptors, when compared to a majority of VIP receptors and PACAP receptors, exhibit an original specificity pattern.

Helodermin and islet hormone release in isolated rat pancreas

The effect of helodermin (1,10,100 pmol/L), a new member of the VIP/secretin/glucagon peptide family, was investigated in glucose- (10 mmol/L) and arginine- (10 mmol/L) induced insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin secretion from the isolated perfused rat pancreas. Helodermin stimulated the somatostatin release in a concentration-dependent manner during the first (controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 113%, ns; 10 pmol/L, 175%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 233%, p less than 0.05) and the second secretion phases (controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 117%, ns; 10 pmol/L, 210%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 362%, p less than 0.05). There was a biphasic glucagon response with an inhibition during the first phase (controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 92%; 10 pmol/L, 63%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 52%, p less than 0.05%) and a stimulation during the second phase (controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 117%, ns; 10 pmol/L, 210%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 362%, p less than 0.05). Helodermin had weak stimulatory effects on pancreatic beta cells with a maximum at 10 pmol/L (first phase: controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 96%, ns; 10 pmol/L, 148%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 136%, ns; second phase: controls, 100%; 1 pmol/L, 104%, ns; 10 pmol/L, 170%, p less than 0.05; 100 pmol/L, 136%, ns).

Structural requirements for the binding of the pituitary adenylate-cyclase-activating peptide to receptors and adenylate-cyclase activation in pancreatic and neuronal membranes

PACAP (pituitary adenylate-cyclase-activating peptide)-binding receptors were investigated in membranes from the rat pancreatic acinar cell line, AR 4-2J, the rat hippocampus and the human neuroblastoma cell line NB-OK, by 125I-PACAP(1-27) (amino acid residues 1-27 of N-terminal amidated PACAP) binding and adenylate cyclase activation. The relative binding of 125I-PACAP(1-27) to the receptor, and ability to activate adenylate cyclase were PACAP greater than or equal to PACAP(1-27) greater than PACAP(2-38) greater than PACAP(1-9)-VIP(10-28)(PACAP-VIP) greater than PACAP(2-27) greater than [Ser9,Tyr13]VIP greater than [Tyr13]VIP greater than or equal to [Ser9]VIP greater than or equal to VIP(1-23)-PACAP(24-27)(VIP-PACAP) greater than VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide). The N-terminal moiety of PACAP(1-27) was more important than the three amino acids at the C-terminus for 125I-PACAP(1-27)-binding site recognition. For rat pancreatic 125I-VIP-binding sites tested with 125I-VIP, the order of binding affinity was PACAP = PACAP(1-27) greater than or equal to VIP = [Ser9]VIP = [Tyr13]VIP = [Ser9,Try13]VIP greater than or equal to PACAP-VIP greater than or equal to VIP-PACAP greater than PACAP(2-38) = PACAP(2-27). Pancreatic 125I-VIP-binding sites, when compared to 125I-PACAP(1-27)-binding sites, showed little specificity and only weak coupling, so that PACAP and VIP-PACAP acted only as partial VIP agonists on adenylate cyclase.

Secretin receptors in the neuroglioma hybrid cell line NG108-15. Characterization and regulation of their expression

Secretin receptors in membranes from the neuroblastoma-glioma hybrid cell line NG108-15 were investigated by 125I-secretin binding and adenylate cyclase activation. On both parameters the corresponding relative potencies of parent peptides were, respectively: secretin greater than helodermin greater than peptide histidine isoleucinamide = vasoactive intestinal peptide. With secretin analogs and secretin fragments, the order of potency for binding was: secretin = [Val5]secretin greater than [Ala2]secretin = [Ala11]secretin greater than [Ala4, Val5] secretin greater than [Ala4]secretin greater than [D-Phe4] secretin greater than [D-Phe2]secretin = secretin (2-27) greater than secretin (3-27) greater than secretin (7-27). Also, on adenylate cyclase, [D-Phe4]secretin, [D-Phe2]secretin, secretin (2-27) and secretin (3-27) were partial agonists while secretin (7-27) was ineffective. The differentiating agent N6,2'-O-dibutyryladenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (1 mM) increased the density of secretin receptors and secretin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity after a lag period of 4 h. After incubation for 24 h, receptor number and enzyme activity were increased 4- and 3-fold, respectively. These effects were inhibited totally by 1 microgram/ml cycloheximide and halved by 5 micrograms/ml actinomycin D. They were mimicked by 1 mM sodium butyrate but were not reproduced by either 8-bromoadenosine 3',5'-monophosphate or the phosphodiesterase inhibitor rac-4-(3-Butoxy-4-methoxybenzyl)-2-imidazolidinone.

Rat PHI, PHI-GLY and PHV (1-42) stimulate adenylate cyclase in six rat tissue and cell membranes

PHI and the two C-terminally extended forms PHI-GLY and PHV(1-42) coexist in rat tissues. We compared the relative potency and efficacy of these three PHI forms and of VIP to stimulate adenylate cyclase activity and, when feasible, to occupy VIP receptors in six rat tissue and cell membranes. With the exception of lung membranes, all three PHI forms were markedly less potent than VIP but all were systematically as efficacious. PHI-GLY and PHV(1-42) were never more potent than PHI itself and their relative potencies revealed four spectra, depending on the membrane preparation tested: 1) PHI = PHI-GLY = PHV(1-42) in hepatic, pulmonary and pancreatic membranes; 2) PHI greater than PHV(1-42) = PHI-GLY in membranes from circulating lymphocytes; 3) PHI = PHV(1-42) greater than PHI-GLY in membranes from the thymocyte cell line 51E; and 4) PHI greater than PHI-GLY = PHV(1-42) in anterior pituitary membranes. These results indicate that the two naturally observed C-terminal extensions of rat PHI variously affected peptide potency on 6 rat membrane preparations.

Decreased adenylate cyclase activation by helodermin and PGE1 in the lectin-resistant variant Wa4 of the mouse melanoma cell line B16

We examined the cultured mouse melanoma cell line B16 (clone F1) and its wheat germ agglutinin-resistant variant Wa4 that suffers from abnormal protein glycosylation (a high fucose:sialic acid ratio in glycoproteins). In both cell lines the adenylate cyclase system was endowed with a functional guanine nucleotide binding protein Gs and was efficiently coupled to alpha-MSH receptors. In the B16 cell line F1 studied we also observed an efficient stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by helodermin, VIP and the VIP analogue [acetyl-His1]VIP, and also by PGE1. In membranes from the lectin-resistant variant Wa4, the stimulations by VIP-like peptides and by PGE1 were reduced by 60% and 50%, respectively, while the stimulation by alpha-MSH remained normal. As other components of the adenylate cyclase system (Gs site, catalytical unit) appeared unchanged in the Wa4 variant, we conclude that impaired glycosylation essentially affected the number of both VIP-like peptide receptors and PGE1 receptors.