Locoregional chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic cancer intra-arterial adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatectomy with portal vein resection

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.

RESULTS

The median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

GEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02635971.

DATE OF REGISTRATION

21/12/2015.

hENT1's role in adjuvant intra-arterial gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to verify the role of hENT1 as a prognostic predictor for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent radical resection followed by intra-arterial infusion of gemcitabine-based regimen.

METHODS

We collected surgical samples from 102 patients with resectable PDAC who received radical resection followed by intra-arterial infusion of gemcitabine-based regimen. The hENT1 expression with the help of immunohistochemistry was conducted using formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissues. The Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to evaluate the mortality hazard associated with the discrepancy between strong and weak of hENT1 expression. Patients' clinical and pathological characteristics were compared between the two groups, then the role of hENT1 as a prognostic predictor was further explored.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included to assess the hENT1 expression. 50 patients were classified into high hENT1 expression group, the other 52 patients were attributed into low hENT1 expression group. High hENT1 expression was related to a significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.014) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.004). Both univariate (p = 0.001) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.001) indicated that high hENT1 expression was related to a decreased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of hENT1 is positive prognostic factor for adjuvant intra-arterial gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in resectable PDAC.

Long Term Outcomes of No-Touch Isolation Principles Applied in Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study with Propensity Score Matching

Background: The recurrence and liver metastasis rates are still high in pancreatic head cancer with curative surgical resection. A no-touch isolation principle in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may improve this situation, however, the exact advantages and efficacy of these principles have not been confirmed. Materials and methods: Among 370 patients who underwent PD, three centers were selected and classified into two groups: the no-touch PD group (n = 70) and the conventional PD group (n = 300). Propensity score matching was used to control for selection bias at a ratio of 1:1. The confounding variables were age, sex, body mass index, adjuvant chemotherapy, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor size and tumor differentiation. Results: Patients in the no-touch PD group had better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) than those in the conventional PD group (OS: 17 vs. 13 months, p = 0.0035, DFS: 15 vs. 12 months, p = 0.087), with lower 1- and 2-year disease-related mortality rates (1-year: 32.9% vs. 47%, p = 0.032; 2-year: 42.5% vs. 82% p = 0.000) and recurrence and liver metastasis rates (1-year: 30.0% vs. 43.3%, p = 0.041; 2-year: 34.3% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.030). Compared with the matched conventional PD group, the no-touch PD group also had a better OS (17 vs. 12 months, p = 0.032). Conclusions: Our study showed the no-touch isolation principle may be a better choice to improve long-term survival for pancreatic cancer patients.

Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. The few available therapeutic options are characterized by low efficacy and high toxicity due to the intrinsic chemoresistance of this tumor type. To improve clinical results, some clinical trials have evaluated regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC. The pancreatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutics has the aim of obtaining higher local concentrations of drugs and, at the same time, of limiting systemic toxicity. This therapeutic approach has already been successfully evaluated for the treatment of several types of tumors. Regarding advanced pancreatic cancers, only a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of this treatment, with very promising results. Therefore, in this review, we summarize literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration for the treatment of advanced PC to deepen knowledge on this topic.

Abstract

Advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very poor prognosis due to its chemoresistant nature. Nowadays, only a few therapeutic options are available for PC, and the most effective ones are characterized by low response rates (RRs), short progression-free survival and overall survival, and severe toxicity. To improve clinical results, small series studies have evaluated loco-regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC, demonstrating its dose-dependent sensitivity towards the tumor. In fact, pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) chemotherapy allows higher local concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents, sparing healthy tissues with a lower rate of adverse events compared to systemic chemotherapy. This therapeutic approach has already been evaluated in different types of tumors, especially in primary and metastatic liver cancers, with favourable results. With regard to advanced PC, a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of PAI with promising results, especially in terms of RRs compared to systemic chemotherapy. However, clear evidence about its efficacy has not been established yet nor have the underlying mechanisms leading to its success. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration in terms of techniques, drug pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced PC.

Significance of pathological positive superior mesenteric/portal venous invasion in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric/portal venous resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently performed with no added morbidity or mortality in case of tumor abutment to the superior mesenteric or portal vein so as to obtain a margin negative resection. True histopathological portal vein invasion is found only in a small subset of such patients. The aim of this review aimed to discuss the significance of histopathological venous invasion in PDAC.

DATA SOURCES

For this review available data was searched from PubMed and analyzed. No randomized trials have been published on this topic.

RESULTS

Existing data on prognostic factors in histopathological venous invasion by PDAC are limited and recent studies indicate worse survival in this subgroup of patients. In addition, venous invasion in PDAC has been associated with large tumors, involved lymph nodes, perineural invasion and R1 resection. The survival of patients with portal venous resection but without histologic venous invasion is reportedly better than those with histopathological venous invasion; though conflicting studies do exist on the subject. Some studies also relate the depth of venous invasion to prognosis after surgical resection of PDAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Frank/'histopathological' invasion of superior mesenteric/portal venous and R1 resection indicate a very poor survival. Such patients may be given the opportunity of benefit of neoadjuvant treatment.

No-touch isolation techniques for pancreatic cancer

The rate of recurrence, including liver metastasis is high in pancreatic cancer, even when complete surgical resection is performed as a curative treatment. In patients with pancreatic cancer, the handling and grasping of the pancreas during surgery may increase the risk of liver metastasis, as squeezing may spread cancer cells via the portal vein. A no-touch isolation technique might prevent the spread of cancer cells via the hematogenous metastatic route in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, while no-touch isolation techniques are simple, feasible and, in theory, ideal procedures for the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, there have been no randomized controlled prospective studies to validate their advantages and their efficacy remains controversial. It is, therefore, worth investigating the use of no-touch isolation techniques in pancreatic cancer.

Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy After Resection for Pancreatic Cancer Using Coaxial Catheter-Port System Compared with Conventional System

PURPOSE

Previous reports have shown the effectiveness of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in pancreatic cancer. However, percutaneous catheter placement is technically difficult after pancreatic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of HAIC using a coaxial technique compared with conventional technique for postoperative pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

93 consecutive patients who received percutaneous catheter-port system placement after pancreatectomy were enrolled. In 58 patients from March 2006 to August 2010 (Group A), a conventional technique with a 5-Fr indwelling catheter was used and in 35 patients from September 2010 to September 2012 (Group B), a coaxial technique with a 2.7-Fr coaxial catheter was used.

RESULTS

The overall technical success rates were 97.1 % in Group B and 86.2 % in Group A. In cases with arterial tortuousness and stenosis, the success rate was significantly higher in Group B (91.7 vs. 53.8 %; P = 0.046). Fluoroscopic and total procedure times were significantly shorter in Group B: 14.7 versus 26.7 min (P = 0.001) and 64.8 versus 80.7 min (P = 0.0051), respectively. No differences were seen in the complication rate. The 1 year liver metastasis rates were 9.9 % using the conventional system and 9.1 % using the coaxial system (P = 0.678). The overall median survival time was 44 months. There was no difference in the survival period between two systems (P = 0.312).

CONCLUSIONS

The coaxial technique is useful for catheter placement after pancreatectomy, achieving a high success rate and reducing fluoroscopic and procedure times, while maintaining the safety and efficacy for adjuvant HAIC in pancreatic cancer.

Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine

Drug resistance still impedes successful cancer chemotherapy. A major goal of early concepts in individualized therapy was to develop in vitro tests to predict tumors’ drug responsiveness. We have developed an in vitro short-term test based on nucleic acid precursor incorporation to determine clinical drug resistance. This test detects inherent and acquired resistance in vitro and transplantable syngeneic and xenografted tumors in vivo. In several clinical trials, clinical resistance was predictable with more than 90% accuracy, while drug sensitivity was detected with less accuracy (~60%). Remarkably, clinical cross-resistance to numerous drugs (multidrug resistance, broad spectrum resistance) was detectable by a single compound, doxorubicin, due to its multifactorial modes of action. The results of this predictive test were in good agreement with predictive assays of other authors. As no predictive test has been established as yet for clinical diagnostics, the identification of sensitive drugs may not reach sufficiently high reliability for clinical routine. A meta-analysis of the literature published during the past four decades considering test results of more than 15,000 tumor patients unambiguously demonstrated that, in the majority of studies, resistance was correctly predicted with an accuracy between 80 and 100%, while drug sensitivity could only be predicted with an accuracy of 50–80%. This synopsis of the published literature impressively illustrates that prediction of drug resistance could be validated. The determination of drug resistance was reliable independent of tumor type, test assay, and drug used in these in vitro tests. By contrast, chemosensitivity could not be predicted with high reliability. Therefore, we propose a rethinking of the “chemosensitivity” concept. Instead, predictive in vitro tests may reliably identify drug-resistant tumors. The clinical consequence imply to subject resistant tumors not to chemotherapy, but to other new treatment options, such as antibody therapy, adoptive immune therapy, hyperthermia, gene therapy, etc. The high accuracy to predict resistant tumors may be exploited to develop new strategies for individualized cancer therapy. This new concept bears the potential of a revival of predictive tests for personalized medicine.

miR-503 regulates the resistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin by targeting Bcl-2

Drug resistance is one of the leading causes of chemotherapy failure in cancer treatment. MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are short non-coding RNA molecules that post-transcriptionally regulate gene expression and play a critical role in diverse biological processes. In this study, we report that miR-503 regulates the resistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin. The expression of miR-503 was decreased in the cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells, A549/CDDP, compared with the parental A549 cells. The overexpression of miR-503 sensitized the A549/CDDP cells to cisplatin, whereas the inhibition of miR-503 in the A549 cells increased resistance to cisplatin. Mechanistically, miR-503 specifically targeted Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic protein upregulated in the A549/CDDP cells. The ectopic expression of miR-503 reduced the Bcl-2 protein level and sensitized the A549/CDDP cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Taken together, our results suggest that miR-503 regulates cell apoptosis, at least in part by targeting Bcl-2, and thus modulates the resistance of non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin.

miR-135a/b modulate cisplatin resistance of human lung cancer cell line by targeting MCL1

microRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA molecules, which post-transcriptionally regulate genes expression and play crucial roles in diverse biological processes, such as development, differentiation, apoptosis, and proliferation. Here, we investigated the possible role of miRNAs in the development of drug resistance in human lung cancer cell line. We found that miR-135a/b were downregulated while MCL1 was upregulated in A549/CDDP (cisplatin) cells, compared with the parental A549 cells. In vitro drug sensitivity assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-135a/b sensitized A549/CDDP cells to cisplatin. The luciferase activity of MCL1 3'-untranslated region-based reporter constructed in A549/CDDP cells suggested that MCL1 was the direct target gene of miR-135a/b. Enforced miR-135a/b expression reduced MCL1 protein level and sensitized A549/CDDP cells to CDDP-induced apoptosis. Taken together, our findings first suggested that hsa-miR-135a/b could play a role in the development of CDDP resistance in lung cancer cell line at least in part by modulation of apoptosis via targeting MCL1.

MicroRNA-19a/b regulates multidrug resistance in human gastric cancer cells by targeting PTEN

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is the major cause of failure of gastric cancer chemotherapy. Members of the miR-17-92 cluster, including miR-19a/b, are considered oncomiRs and influence multiple aspects of the malignant phenotype of gastric cancer. However, the role of miR-19a/b in MDR in gastric cancer and its underlying mechanism remain unclear. In this study, we found that miR-19a/b were upregulated in MDR cell lines. Our results also showed that miR-19a/b upregulation decreased the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to anticancer drugs. We further confirmed that miR-19a/b accelerated the ADR efflux of gastric cancer cells by increasing the levels of mdr1 and P-gp and that miR-19a/b suppressed drug-induced apoptosis by regulating Bcl-2 and Bax. Finally, we verified that PTEN, an inhibitor of AKT phosphorylation, is the functional target of miR-19a/b. Overall, these findings demonstrated that miR-19a/b promote MDR in gastric cancer cells by targeting PTEN.

Analysis of liver metastasis after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

AIM: To investigate the risk factors affecting the liver metastasis (LM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after resection.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 101 PDAC patients who underwent surgical resection at the Samsung Medical Center between January 2000 and December 2004. Forty one patients with LM were analyzed for the time of metastasis, prognostic factors affecting LM, and survival.

RESULTS: LM was found in 40.6%. The median time of the LM (n = 41) was 6.0 ± 4.6 mo and most LM occurred within 1 year. In univariate analysis, tumor size, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and perineural invasion were factors affecting LM after resection. In multivariate analysis, tumor size was the most important factor for LM. In univariate analysis, tumor cell differentiation was significant to LM in low-risk groups.

CONCLUSION: LM after resection of PDAC occurs early and shows poor survival. Tumor size is the key indicator for LM after resection.

miR-200bc/429 cluster modulates multidrug resistance of human cancer cell lines by targeting BCL2 and XIAP

PURPOSE

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA molecules, which post-transcriptionally regulate genes expression and play crucial roles in diverse biological processes. Recent studies have shown that dysregulation of miRNAs might modulate the resistance of cancer cells to anti-cancer drugs, yet the modulation mechanism is not fully understood. We aimed to investigate the possible role of miRNAs in the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in human gastric and lung cancer cell lines.

METHODS

miRNA Quantitative real-time PCR was used to detect the different miRNA expression levels between drug resistant and parental cancer cells. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay was used to test the drug-resistant phenotype changes in cancer cells via over or downregulation of miRNAs. Dual-luciferase activity assay was used to verify the target genes of miRNAs. Western blot analysis and apoptosis assay were used to elucidate the mechanism of miRNAs on modulating drug resistance in cancer cells.

RESULTS

miR-200bc/429 cluster was downregulated, while BCL2 and XIAP were upregulated in both MDR SGC7901/VCR (vincristine) and A549/CDDP (cisplatin) cells, compared with the parental SGC7901 and A549 cells, respectively. Overexpression of miR-200bc/429 cluster sensitized SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells to anti-cancer drugs, respectively. Both BCL2 and XIAP 3'-UTR reporters constructed in MDR cells suggested that BCL2 and XIAP were the common target genes of the miR-200bc/429 cluster. Enforced miR-200bc/429 cluster expression reduced BCL2 and XIAP protein level and sensitized both MDR cells to VCR-induced and CDDP-induced apoptosis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings first suggest that miR-200bc/429 cluster could play a role in the development of MDR in both gastric and lung cancer cell lines, at least in part by modulation of apoptosis via targeting BCL2 and XIAP.

miR-497 modulates multidrug resistance of human cancer cell lines by targeting BCL2

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short non-coding RNA molecules, which posttranscriptionally regulate genes expression and play crucial roles in diverse biological processes, such as development, differentiation, apoptosis, and proliferation. Here, we investigated the possible role of miRNAs in the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in human gastric and lung cancer cell lines. We found that miR-497 was downregulated in both multidrug-resistant human gastric cancer cell line SGC7901/vincristine (VCR) and multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line A549/cisplatin (CDDP) and the downregulation of miR-497 was concurrent with the upregulation of BCL2 protein, compared with the parental SGC7901 and A549 cell lines, respectively. In vitro drug sensitivity assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-497 sensitized SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells to anticancer drugs, respectively. The luciferase activity of BCL2 3'-untranslated region-based reporter constructed in SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells suggested that BCL2 was the direct target gene of miR-497. Enforced miR-497 expression reduced BCL2 protein level and sensitized SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells to VCR-induced and CDDP-induced apoptosis, respectively. Taken together, our findings first suggested that has-miR-497 could play a role in both gastric and lung cancer cell lines at least in part by modulation of apoptosis via targeting BCL2.

miR-181b modulates multidrug resistance by targeting BCL2 in human cancer cell lines

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short noncoding RNA molecules, which posttranscriptionally regulate genes expression and play crucial roles in diverse biological processes, such as development, differentiation, apoptosis and proliferation. Here, we investigated the possible role of miRNAs in the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in human gastric and lung cancer cell lines. We found that miR-181b was downregulated in both multidrug-resistant human gastric cancer cell line SGC7901/vincristine (VCR) and multidrug-resistant human lung cancer cell line A549/cisplatin (CDDP), and the downregulation of miR-181b in SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells was concurrent with the upregulation of BCL2 protein, compared with the parental SGC7901 and A549 cell lines, respectively. In vitro drug sensitivity assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-181b sensitized SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells to anticancer drugs, respectively. The luciferase activity of a BCL2 3'-untranslated region-based reporter construct in SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells suggests that a new target site in the 3'UTR of BCL2 of the mature miR-181s (miR-181a, miR-181b, miR-181c and miR-181d) was found. Enforced miR-181b expression reduced BCL2 protein level and sensitized SGC7901/VCR and A549/CDDP cells to VCR-induced and CDDP-induced apoptosis, respectively. Taken together, our findings suggest that miR-181b could play a role in the development of MDR in both gastric and lung cancer cell lines, at least in part, by modulation of apoptosis via targeting BCL2.

Chemosensitivity test for 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine predicts outcome of gastric cancer patients receiving S-1 postoperatively

BACKGROUND

Chemosensitivity tests have long been discussed but remain a topic of research. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the results of a chemosensitivity test for 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine and the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer patients treated with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, as adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

For gastric cancer patients, we performed surgical treatment and a lymph node dissection of D2 or more. Afterwards, a chemosensitivity test for 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine was performed, using the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug-sensitivity test (CD-DST), in surgical specimens. All the patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year, and the overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and adverse events were investigated.

RESULTS

The chemosensitivity test was performed for 27 patients. The growth inhibition rate (IR) was 50% or more (high-sensitivity group) in 59.3% (16 cases) and it was under 50% (low-sensitivity group) in 40.7% (11 cases). The 3-year OS rate was 100% in the high-sensitivity group and 62.34% in the low-sensitivity group. The 3-year RFS rate was 83.33% in the high-sensitivity group and 24.24% in the low-sensitivity group. Thus, the 3-year OS rate and the 3-year RFS rate were higher in the high-sensitivity group than in the low-sensitivity group. No adverse events of grade 3 or greater severity were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the chemosensitivity test were correlated with the patient outcome. Therefore, such results might be useful for individualizing cancer chemotherapy and for determining future indications for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

Synchronous major vessel resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. In the 1970s, regional pancreatectomy advocated by Fortner was associated with unacceptably high morbidity and mortality rates, with no impact on long-term survival. With the establishment of a multidisciplinary approach, improvements in preoperative staging techniques, surgical expertise, and perioperative care reduced mortality rates and improved 5-year-survival rates are now achieved following resection in high-volume centres. Perioperative morbidity and mortality following PD with portal vein resection are comparable to standard PD, with reported 5-year-survival rates of up to 17%. Segmental resection and reconstruction of the common hepatic artery/proper hepatic artery (CHA/PHA) can be performed to achieve an R0 resection in selected patients with limited involvement of the CHA/PHA at the origin of the gastroduodenal artery (GDA). PD with concomitant major vessel resection for borderline resectable tumours should be performed when a margin-negative resection is anticipated at high-volume centres with expertise in complex pancreatic surgery. Where an incomplete (R1 or R2) resection is likely neoadjuvant treatment with systemic chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation as part of a clinical trial should be offered to all patients.

Liver perfusion chemotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil followed by systemic gemcitabine administration for resected pancreatic cancer: preliminary results of a prospective phase 2 study

OBJECTIVES

Liver perfusion chemotherapy (LPC) for pancreatic cancer has been rarely undertaken in a postoperative adjuvant setting. We evaluated the feasibility and antitumor efficacy of LPC with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by gemcitabine treatment.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 27 patients who underwent pancreatic resection and subsequent LPC + gemcitabine treatment during a 3-year period. The liver was infused with 5-FU (125 mg/body per day per route) via both routes of hepatic artery and portal vein for more than 21 days. After that, gemcitabine (1000 mg/m) was administered biweekly.

RESULTS

Portal vein thrombosis developed in 1 patient, but 89% patients tolerated LPC for more than 21 days with no life-threatening complication. Systemic administration of gemcitabine was accomplished in 93%; however, 1 patient died of serious capillary leak syndrome. No grade 4 toxicity was recorded, except for that patient. Median survival time and disease-free survival were 27.5 and 24.5 months, respectively. Hepatic relapse was observed in 25.9% (n = 7). Survival was in favor of paraaortic node-negative cases (n = 20) with a 2-year survival of 68.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver perfusion chemotherapy was feasible with acceptable toxicity. Systemic use of gemcitabine also seems to be safe for the most part. This adjuvant chemotherapy shows promising survival benefit and seems to be indicative to paraaortic node-negative tumors.

miR-15b and miR-16 modulate multidrug resistance by targeting BCL2 in human gastric cancer cells

microRNAs are endogenous small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression negatively at posttranscriptional level. This latest addition to the complex gene regulatory circuitry revolutionizes our way to understanding physiological and pathological processes in the human body. Here we investigated the possible role of microRNAs in the development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in gastric cancer cells. microRNA expression profiling revealed a limited set of microRNAs with altered expression in multidrug- resistant gastric cancer cell line SGC7901/VCR compared to its parental SGC7901 cell line. Among the downregulated microRNAs are miR-15b and miR-16, members of miR-15/16 family, whose expression was further validated by qRT-PCR. In vitro drug sensitivity assay demonstrated that overexpression of miR-15b or miR-16 sensitized SGC7901/VCR cells to anticancer drugs whereas inhibition of them using antisense oligonucleotides conferred SGC7901 cells MDR. The downregulation of miR-15b and miR-16 in SGC7901/VCR cells was concurrent with the upregulation of Bcl-2 protein. Enforced mir-15b or miR-16 expression reduced Bcl-2 protein level and the luciferase activity of a BCL2 3' untranslated region-based reporter construct in SGC7901/VCR cells, suggesting that BCL2 is a direct target of miR-15b and miR-16. Moreover, overexpression of miR-15b or miR-16 could sensitize SGC7901/VCR cells to VCR-induced apoptosis. Taken together, our findings suggest that miR-15b and miR-16 could play a role in the development of MDR in gastric cancer cells at least in part by modulation of apoptosis via targeting BCL2.

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine the efficacy and tolerability of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (12 Stage IVa and 4 Stage IVb with liver metastasis) were enrolled. The catheter for intra-arterial infusion was placed at the position to distribute chemotherapeutic drugs to both the pancreatic tumor and the liver. Continuous infusion of 5-FU (250 mg/m(2) per day, 7 days) with intermittent bolus injection of cisplatin (5 mg/m(2) per day, 5 days) was repeated twice via the catheter, followed by intermittent injection of 5-FU (375 or 750 mg/m(2)) or cisplatin (7.5 mg/m(2)) once a week. The survival of these patients was compared with that of the matched historical control patients treated with other modalities.

RESULTS

In 12 Stage IVa locally advanced patients, the response rate was 58.3% (7 partial response). The median survival time was 22.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 83.3%, 41.7%, and 16.7%, respectively. The locally advanced patients treated with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy showed significantly better survival than the control patients. In contrast, Stage IVb patients with liver metastasis showed no response to the treatment (response rate, 0%). Treatment was discontinued in 2 patients until recovery from hematologic or hepatic toxicity, but fatal adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin is tolerable and feasible treatment to improve the prognosis in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients without distant metastasis.

Adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer

Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the UK, Europe and US, with incidence closely paralleling mortality. Until recently, enthusiasm for treating these patients was limited for a number of reasons: the majority of patients undergoing surgery would relapse early, adjuvant treatment was of unproven value and systemic therapy in advanced disease had only a small chance of a short-term benefit. More recently, however, it has become recognised that specialist surgery can improve results and there is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy has a significant advantage in terms of 5-year survival. In particular adjuvant systemic 5-fluorouracil with folinic acid can result in 5-year survival of < or = 29% (compared with 11% for controls) and adjuvant gemcitabine can improve disease-free survival to 13.4 months from a median of 6.9 months in controls, but not overall survival. In contrast the role of adjuvant chemoradiation in addition to chemotherapy remains unproven and the survival results appear to be inferior to systemic chemotherapy alone. New agents, such as capecitabine and erlotinib, are emerging with some activity in this dismal disease signalling hope for the future.

Clinical implications of combined portal vein resection as a palliative procedure in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of combined portal vein resections are controversial.

METHODS

One-hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients underwent macroscopically curative pancreatectomies for pancreatic head carcinoma between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2004. Portal vein resection was performed in 86 patients (58%). Data on surgical mortality, morbidity, perioperative outcome, pathological factors, initial recurrence site, and survival were retrospectively compared between the patients with and without portal vein resection.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was lower among patients who underwent portal vein resection. The median survival period was 14 months for the portal vein resection group and 35 months for the non-portal vein resection group, respectively. Combined portal vein resection was a significant predictor of poor survival using a multivariate analysis. Portal vein resection was strongly associated with larger tumor size, the degree of retropancreatic tissue invasion, the presence of extrapancreatic nerve plexus invasion, lymph node metastases, and positive cancer infiltration at the surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Portal vein resection at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy can be safely performed. However, most of patients requiring portal vein resection do not achieve a potentially curative resection or a favorable survival term. As a result, the aggressive application and the strict selection of portal vein resection might reduce the incidence of positive surgical margins, enabling long-term survival in patients who do not require portal vein resection.

Systematic review of outcome of synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumour clearance during pancreatectomy may be facilitated by resection of the portal-superior mesenteric vein, but this is associated with increased perioperative risk. There is no consensus about which patients benefit from portal-superior mesenteric vein resection.

METHODS

A systematic appraisal was carried out of the literature on portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy to identify recurrent themes to guide management. A computerized search of the Medline and Embase databases found 52 non-duplicated studies providing relevant data in 1646 patients. Pooled data were examined for information on outcome categories relating to operation, complications, histopathology and overall outcome.

RESULTS

The median (range) number of patients with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection per cohort was 23 (4-172). Median operating time was 513 (168-1740) min and blood loss 1750 (300-26000) ml. Postoperative morbidity ranged from 9 to 78 per cent with a median per cohort of 42 per cent. There were 73 perioperative deaths (5.9 per cent of 1235 for whom mortality data were provided). Median survival was 13 months, and 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50, 16 and 7 per cent respectively. Specimen histopathology confirmed positive nodes in 67.4 per cent.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest collective report to date on portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatectomy. The high rate of nodal metastases and low 5-year survival rates suggest that by the time of tumour involvement of the portal vein cure is unlikely, even with radical resection.

Does postoperative chemotherapy have a survival benefit for patients with pancreatic cancer?

In our study, we investigated whether postoperative chemotherapy improved survival in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. Between 1987 and 2004, 111 patients underwent pancreatic resection against invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas in Wakayama Medical University Hospital. Median survival time (MST) was 19.4 months, 8.6 months, and 7.2 months, in JPS Stage III (UICC Stage IIA and IIB), JPS Stage IVa (UICC Stage IIA and IIB), and JPS Stage IVb (UICC Stage IV), respectively (P < 0.01). The MST of the chemotherapy group was 12 months, and the MST of the non-chemotherapy group was 8.4 months (P < 0.05). Moreover, in JPS Stage IV (UICC Stage IIA, IIB, III, and IV) highly advanced pancreatic cancer, the MST of the chemotherapy group was 10.9 months, and the MST of the group without chemotherapy was 6.6 months (P < 0.01). Since pancreatic cancer is characterized by an aggressive tumor with a high recurrent rate, postoperative chemotherapy is effective for an improvement of survival.

Adjuvant treatment

Exocrine pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the western world, accounting for 5% of all cancer-related deaths. Only a small percentage of patients with pancreatic cancer are able to undergo potentially curative resection, even in specialized centres, and prognosis remains poor after successful surgery. Over the last few years efforts have been directed towards the development of adjuvant therapies in attempts to improve outcome. The main trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy with follow-on chemotherapy are described in this paper, followed by the results of the ESPAC-1 trial and the status of ESPAC-2 and -3 trials.

Factors predicting recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma frequently recurs postoperatively, and we analyzed clinicopathological features of patients treated by surgical resection to find predictors of postoperative recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed that included 69 patients between 1985 and 2003. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated for tumor recurrences by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Mean survival time and actuarial 5-year disease-specific survival were significantly lower in cases of hepatic metastasis (13 months, 0%) and in cases of peritoneal carcinomatosis (15 months, 6.8%) than in cases of local retroperitoneal recurrence (30 months, 21%). Univariate and logistic regression analyses showed undifferentiated adenocarcinoma to be independently associated with hepatic metastasis (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-37.0) and invasion of the portal vein to be independently associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.8). Multivariate analysis showed undifferentiated adenocarcinoma, invasion of the anterior capsule, and invasion of the portal vein to be independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Undifferentiated adenocarcinoma and invasion of the portal vein are predictors of poor outcome and are related to hepatic metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis, respectively. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, including intra-arterial chemotherapy, should be selected according to prediction of the patterns of recurrence.

Complications with Reconstruction Procedures in Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy

This study was conducted retrospectively to examine the efficacy of Traverso reconstruction compared with Billroth I reconstruction after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, in the prevention of several complications. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is an aggressive surgery, and insufficiency of the pancreaticoenterostomy plays an important role in the postoperative progression. However, reports examining the correlation between pancreatic fistula and the type of reconstruction after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy have been limited. Sixty-four patients who underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (33 reconstructed by the Traverso technique and 31 reconstructed by the Billroth I technique) were entered into this study to investigate whether the complications were related to the type of reconstruction procedure employed. Insufficiency of the pancreaticojejunostomy, including major leakage and pancreatic fistula, occurred in 18.2% of the reconstructions by Billroth I and 0% of the reconstructions by Traverso (p < 0.05). In addition, jejunal obstruction by recurrent tumor in the remnant pancreas was observed in 3 patients reconstructed by Billroth I, and required palliative bypass surgery. Reconstruction by the Traverso procedure after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe surgical method and has an advantage for advanced pancreatic cancer, which has high risk of jejunal obstruction by recurrent tumor in the remnant pancreas.

The Evaluation of Duct-to-mucosal Pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy

This study was conducted to examine the efficacy of duct-to-mucosal pancreaticojejunostomy compared with external stented pancreaticojejunostomy in prevention of several complications, retrospectively. Seventy-six patients with pancreatic head resection (59 male; median age, 60.1 years) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan, between January 1, 1994, and March 31, 2002. In early postoperative status, the incidence of pancreatic fistula by duct-to-mucosal anastomosis (n = 45) was similar to that by external stent (n = 31); soft pancreas is a risk factor of pancreatic fistula compared with hard pancreas (p < 0.05). During the late postoperative period, however, no patients with duct-to-mucosal anastomosis showed pancreatic duct dilatation by computed tomography (CT). At the same time, 58.8% of patients with external stent followed by CT showed pancreatic duct dilatation (p < 0.01). The duct-to-mucosal anastomosis was more effective pancreaticojejunostomy than the external stent in terms of prevention of pancreatic duct dilatation, and it should be the surgical procedure of choice in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Prognostic impact of cysteine proteases cathepsin B and cathepsin L in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The cysteine proteases cathepsin B (CTSB) and L (CTSL) have been implicated in tumor spread and metastatic formation. In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of these proteases is not very well defined. To find out which cell types produce CTSB and CTSL and to evaluate the prognostic impact of these proteases, 70 specimens from curatively resected patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were examined by in situ hybridization and immunohisto-chemistry.

METHODS

Seventy patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied after R0 resection with a follow-up of at least 3 years. CTSB and CTSL expression was performed immunohisto-chemically using polyclonal anti-CTSB and CTSL antibodies. To detect cell types involved in producing CTSB and CTSL as well as the intracellular localization of specific mRNA sequences, nonisotopic in situ hybridization was performed. The correlations among CTSB and CTSL expression, clinicopathologic parameters, and clinical outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

The immunoreactivity was 96% for CTSB and 90% for CTSL. Positive mRNA signals were obtained in the cytoplasm tumor cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts in 77% for CTSB and 81% for CTSL, respectively. Statistical analysis showed a significant correlation between CTSB/CTSL expression and tumor grading (P < 0.05) and between CTSB and lymphatic invasion (P = 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed statistical significance for CTSB/CTSL expression with the survival after curative resection (P < 0.05). Both proteases are strong prognostic markers in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0001) beside UICC stage, nodal status, tumor size, and grading (P < 0.05). Furthermore, CTSB expression is an independent prognostic marker for cancer recurrence within 6 months after curative surgery in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CTSB and CTSL are strong and independent prognostic markers in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma rather than UICC stage, TNM classification, or tumor grading. Furthermore, CTSB is a predictor for early recurrence after curative resection. These data underline the significance of tumor-associated proteolysis for cancer invasion and metastasis and may lead to defining subgroups of patients with early recurrence and poor outcome.

Clinical benefit of chemosensitivity test for patients with regional lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients who have undergone resection for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma are at high risk of recurrence and early death. The role of the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in this population needs to be determined. The present study was designed to determine whether the chemosensitivity test in fresh human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, using highly purified tumor cells, correlates with the clinical response.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients with resected squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus between 1993 and 2000 was performed. We determined the chemosensitivity for cisplatin (CDDP), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), mitomycin C, and adriamycin in vitro in fresh human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using the MTT assay. Regional lymph node-positive (N1) patients who received sequential postoperative chemotherapy were compared with lymph node positive patients who underwent surgery alone.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were reviewed, and chemosensitivity tests were successfully performed in 46 patients: 20 patients received surgery alone (S group), and 26 patients received surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy (SC group) according to results of MTT assay using highly purified tumor cells. When the SC group was divided into an SC-low group (inhibition rate of CDDP + 5-FU was below 85%, n = 15) and an SC-high group (over 85%, n = 11), the SC-high group showed more significant survival prolongation than the S group or the SC-low group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the results of the conventional MTT assay may be useful in evaluating the optimum adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with regional lymph node positive (pN1) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.