1
|
Sirtl S, Hohmann E, Ahmad M, Bretthauer K, Junge M, Vornhülz M, Goni E, Saka D, Knoblauch M, Aghamaliyev U, Schulz C, Zorniak M, Mahajan UM, Mayerle J, Beyer G. Severity and outcome of a first episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis is not more severe than pancreatitis of other etiologies. Pancreatology 2024:S1424-3903(24)00701-4. [PMID: 39147660 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With respect to severity and outcome of an index episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis the current literature reports conflicting retrospective results. One reason might be the retrospective study design precluding in depth analysis resulting in mixed etiologies and combination of index episode versus recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis. METHODS In this retrospective monocentric cohort study, we retrieved all patients with a first acute pancreatitis episode treated between 2005 and 2021 at the LMU University Hospital from our clinical information system based on the respective ICD-10 codes. In an initial sample of 1390 presumed idiopathic pancreatitis patients we identified 68 confirmed idiopathic acute pancreatitis patients and compared those to 75 first-time alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis patients and 390 first-time biliary-induced acute pancreatitis patients. Clinical outcome (severity, SIRS, mortality, and re-admission rate) was set as outcome measures. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS In alcohol-induced acute pancreatitis moderate and severe courses occur significantly more often when compared to idiopathic acute pancreatitis (17.33 % vs. 10.29 %; multinomial logistic regression p = 0.0021). There were no significant differences in mortality between first-time alcoholic, idiopathic and biliary pancreatitis (p = 0.6328). Patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis had significantly more hospital readmissions (within 30 days) compared to alcohol-induced pancreatitis patients (p = 0.0284). CONCLUSION In the context of a first episode of acute pancreatitis, idiopathic acute pancreatitis remains a challenging diagnosis posing an increased risk of recurrence, but not an increased risk for a more severe disease course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Sirtl
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Hohmann
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Mahmood Ahmad
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mali Junge
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Marlies Vornhülz
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Goni
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Didem Saka
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathilda Knoblauch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ughur Aghamaliyev
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Zorniak
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Endoscopy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Ujjwal M Mahajan
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - Georg Beyer
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang Q, Fu Z, Li S, Ding X, Zhang W, Ma R, Zhai Q. Clinical characteristics of three distinct types of pancreatitis with overlapping etiologies: A ten-year retrospective cohort study. Pancreatology 2023; 23:949-956. [PMID: 37968184 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is frequently observed in non-HTG-induced acute pancreatitis (AP), such as in the early stage of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). There is overlap in the etiologies of ABP, HTG-AP, and biliary-hypertriglyceridemia acute pancreatitis (BHAP), which may be perplexing for clinicians. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 394 AP patients. The patients were divided into three groups based on etiology. We analyzed the differences among the three groups of patients in terms of general information, laboratory parameters, and prognosis. RESULTS The mean age of patients in the ABP group was significantly higher than that in the HTG-AP and BHAP groups (p < 0.001). Females made up a greater percentage of the ABP group, whereas males made up the majority in the HTG-AP and BHAP groups. The ABP group had the highest PCT, AMS, LPS, ALT, AST, GGT, TBIL, DBIL, APACHE II, and BISAP scores. TG and BMI were highest in the HTG-AP group. AST and GGT levels were substantially greater in BHAP patients than those in HTG-AP. The BHAP group had the greatest incidence of organ failure, systemic complications, and local complications. CONCLUSION ABP usually develops in people aged 50-59 years. HTG-AP primarily affects people aged 30-39 years. However, the peak incidence age of BHAP falls between the two aforementioned age groups (40-49 years). We also found that patients with BHAP seem to be in an intermediate state in terms of some biochemical markers and demographic characteristics. Furthermore, BHAP may have the worst clinical outcomes compared with HTG-AP and ABP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiwei Zhang
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Dept, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401320, PR China.
| | - Zhan Fu
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Dept, Banan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401320, PR China.
| | - Shengwei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
| | - Xiong Ding
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
| | - Wenfeng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
| | - Rong Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
| | - Qilong Zhai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400010, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cammarata F, Rovati L, Fontana P, Gambitta P, Armellino A, Aseni P. Endoscopic Ultrasound to Identify the Actual Cause of Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3256. [PMID: 37892077 PMCID: PMC10606009 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) presents a diagnostic challenge and refers to cases where the cause of acute pancreatitis remains uncertain despite a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of IAP. This review explores the pivotal role of EUS in detecting the actual cause of IAP and assessing its accuracy, timing, safety, and future technological improvement. In this review, we investigate the role of EUS in identifying the actual cause of IAP by examining the available literature. We aim to assess possible existing evidence regarding EUS accuracy, timing, and safety and explore potential trends of future technological improvements in EUS for diagnostic purposes. Following PRISMA guidelines, 60 pertinent studies were selected and analysed. EUS emerges as a crucial diagnostic tool, particularly when conventional imaging fails. It can offer intricate visualization of the pancreas, biliary system, and adjacent structures. Microlithiasis, biliary sludge, chronic pancreatitis, and small pancreatic tumors seem to be much more accurately identified with EUS in the setting of IAP. The optimal timing for EUS is post-resolution of the acute phase of the disease. With a low rate of complications, EUS poses minimal safety concerns. EUS-guided interventions, including fine-needle aspiration, collection drainage, and biopsies, aid in the cytological analysis. With high diagnostic accuracy, safety, and therapeutic potential, EUS is able to improve patient outcomes when managing IAP. Further refinement of EUS techniques and cost-effectiveness assessment of EUS-guided approaches need to be explored in multicentre prospective studies. This review underscores EUS as a transformative tool in unraveling IAP's enigma and advancing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cammarata
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy;
| | - Lucrezia Rovati
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
- Emergency Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Fontana
- Department of Gastroenterology, ASST Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy; (P.F.); (P.G.)
| | - Pietro Gambitta
- Department of Gastroenterology, ASST Ovest Milanese, 20025 Legnano, Italy; (P.F.); (P.G.)
| | - Antonio Armellino
- Endoscopy Division, Ospedale San Leopoldo Mandic di Merate, ASST Lecco, 23807 Lecco, Italy;
| | - Paolo Aseni
- Emergency Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyu Y, Ye S, Wang B. Outcomes of delayed versus early endoscopic intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis with non-severe acute cholangitis. BMC Surg 2022; 22:440. [PMID: 36572852 PMCID: PMC9791723 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01890-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite previous studies on endoscopic interventions in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), the optimal time to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for ABP with non-severe acute cholangitis (AC) remains controversial. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with concurrent ABP and non-severe AC. The patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent ERCP ≤ 72 h after admission (early ERCP group) and those who underwent ERCP > 72 h after admission (delayed ERCP group). The primary outcomes were the technical success rate and ERCP-related complications. RESULTS The study involved 164 patients (early ERCP, n = 70; delayed ERCP, n = 94) who were treated from 1 December 2 to 2016 to 12 December 2021. The patients' baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The technical success rate of ERCP was similar between the two groups (94.29% vs. 97.87%, p = 0.43). Morbidity was also similar between the two groups (p = 0.83). There was no significant difference in the total hospital stay (p = 0.13). However, the early ERCP group had a longer post-ERCP hospital stay (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION This retrospective analysis showed that delayed ERCP performed > 72 h after admission has economic and safety outcomes similar to those of early ERCP for patients with concurrent ABP and non-severe AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Lyu
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China
| | - Shenjian Ye
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China ,grid.412551.60000 0000 9055 7865School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Wang
- grid.268099.c0000 0001 0348 3990Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People’s Hospital, Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, 60 West Wuning Road, Dongyang, 322100 Zhejiang People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beyer G, Hoffmeister A, Michl P, Gress TM, Huber W, Algül H, Neesse A, Meining A, Seufferlein TW, Rosendahl J, Kahl S, Keller J, Werner J, Friess H, Bufler P, Löhr MJ, Schneider A, Lynen Jansen P, Esposito I, Grenacher L, Mössner J, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. S3-Leitlinie Pankreatitis – Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – September 2021 – AWMF Registernummer 021-003. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2022; 60:419-521. [PMID: 35263785 DOI: 10.1055/a-1735-3864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Beyer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Albrecht Hoffmeister
- Bereich Gastroenterologie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Patrick Michl
- Universitätsklinik u. Poliklinik Innere Medizin I mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Mathias Gress
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Wolfgang Huber
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München TUM, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Hana Algül
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München TUM, II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Albrecht Neesse
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, gastrointestinale Onkologie und Endokrinologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Alexander Meining
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Deutschland
| | | | - Jonas Rosendahl
- Universitätsklinik u. Poliklinik Innere Medizin I mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Kahl
- Klinik für Innere Medizin m. Schwerpkt. Gastro./Hämat./Onko./Nephro., DRK Kliniken Berlin Köpenick, Deutschland
| | - Jutta Keller
- Medizinische Klinik, Israelitisches Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Jens Werner
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum München, Deutschland
| | - Helmut Friess
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland
| | - Philip Bufler
- Klinik für Pädiatrie m. S. Gastroenterologie, Nephrologie und Stoffwechselmedizin, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Matthias J Löhr
- Department of Gastroenterology, Karolinska, Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Schweden
| | - Alexander Schneider
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld, Deutschland
| | - Petra Lynen Jansen
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Irene Esposito
- Pathologisches Institut, Heinrich-Heine-Universität und Universitätsklinikum Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Lars Grenacher
- Conradia Radiologie München Schwabing, München, Deutschland
| | - Joachim Mössner
- Bereich Gastroenterologie, Klinik und Poliklinik für Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie Pneumologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Markus M Lerch
- Klinik für Innere Medizin A, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Deutschland.,Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Deutschland
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Facundo HG, Montoliu RR, Llanos DRC, Naval GS, Millán EL, Gordo SL, Bosch JH, Rodríguez SL, Baranera MM, Martínez SG. Cholecystectomy 7 days vs 4 weeks after mild biliary pancreatitis; looking a decrease the incidence of persistent choledocholithiasis and ERCP: A multicentric randomized clinical trial. Int J Surg 2022; 98:106207. [PMID: 34995805 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild acute biliary pancreatitis (MABP) requires definitive treatment of the cholelithiasis to avoid recurrent biliary events. Recent publications recommend performing early surgery to prevent readmissions. However, an exceedingly early cholecystectomy could imply missing the presence of persistent choledocholithiasis or requiring a significant number of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCP). This multicentre randomized clinical trial compares early surgery performed a week after MABP with delayed surgery (at 4 weeks), to compare readmission rates for recurrent biliary events and the incidence of residual choledocholithiasis between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 198 patients with a first episode of MABP defined by the Atlanta 2012 criteria were enrolled. Randomization was done by a central study coordinator: 98 to early surgery and 100 to delayed surgery. All of them had preoperative or intraoperative imaging to exclude persistent choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed by dedicated teams of experienced surgeons. RESULTS Early surgery reduced the rate of readmissions for biliary events before cholecystectomy by half (7.2% vs 15.8%, p = 0,058). There were no differences in the type of surgery, postoperative stay, or complications compared with delayed surgery. Choledocholithiasis was observed in 9.0% of patients in the early group and 7.7% in the delayed group (p 0,719). The preoperative or intraoperative imaging study avoided unnecessary ERCP, which was performed in only 6 (3%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Early cholecystectomy performed seven days after resolution of MABP had a low incidence of recurrent biliary events and complications, and was not associated with an increase in residual choledocholithiasis or need for unnecessary ERCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Gómez Facundo
- General and Digestive Surgery Department, Moisès Broggi Hospital, CSI, Barcelona, Spain General and Digestive Surgery Department, Sant Joan de Déu Hospital, Martorell, Barcelona, Spain General and Digestive Surgery Department, Joan XXIII Hospital, Tarragona, Spain General and Digestive Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari Garraf, Sant Pere de Ribes, Barcelona, Spain General and Digestive Surgery Department, Consorci Sanitari Vic, Vic, Barcelona, Spain General and Digestive Surgery Department, Dos de Maig Hospital, Barcelona, Spain Epidemiology Department, Moisès Broggi Hospital, CSI, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Porozan S, Alavinejad P, Mozafari J, Kazem Mousavi H, Delirrooyfard A. Serum Level of Galectin-3 in Early Detection of Acute Pancreatitis. Middle East J Dig Dis 2021; 13:350-355. [PMID: 36606007 PMCID: PMC9489453 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2021.246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common cause of hospital admissions. Diagnosing AP in patients presenting to emergency departments remains a challenge for physicians. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of galectin-3 to find a new and effective method for detecting AP. METHODS In this prospective cross-sectional study, 43 patients with a manifestation of AP were enrolled. The serum levels of galectin-3 were measured at admission and 48 hours later and compared between the groups of patients with and without AP. RESULTS Serum levels of galectin-3 at admission and after 48 hours were significantly higher in AP cases compared with non-AP individuals. The area under the curve (AUC) for galectin-3 was 73.1%, which revealed a good accuracy in predicting the AP diagnosis. CONCLUSION Serum levels of galectin-3 at admission and after 48 hours were significantly higher in AP cases, and their diagnostic value was acceptable in the detection of AP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samaneh Porozan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Pezhman Alavinejad
- Alimentary Tract Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital Clinical Research Development Unit, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Javad Mozafari
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Hosein Kazem Mousavi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| | - Ali Delirrooyfard
- Imam Khomeini Hospital Clinical Research Development Unit, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
,Corresponding Author: Ali Delirrooyfard, MD Address : Ahvaz,Azadegan St. Imam Khomeini Medical Center of Ahvaz, Ahvaz,Iran Tel : + 989173159418 Fax : + 986132225763
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li H, Yang X, Cao B, Guan J. Increased plasma clusterin and miR-21 in acute pancreatitis. Br J Biomed Sci 2021; 78:229-232. [PMID: 33975532 DOI: 10.1080/09674845.2021.1904691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H Li
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, West Coast Hospital, Huangdao, Shandong, China
| | - X Yang
- Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - B Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, West Coast Hospital, Huangdao, Shandong, China
| | - J Guan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, West Coast Hospital, Huangdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Metabolomic-based clinical studies and murine models for acute pancreatitis disease: A review. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2021; 1867:166123. [PMID: 33713791 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most common gastroenterological disorders requiring hospitalization and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Metabolomics nowadays not only help us to understand cellular metabolism to a degree that was not previously obtainable, but also to reveal the importance of the metabolites in physiological control, disease onset and development. An in-depth understanding of metabolic phenotyping would be therefore crucial for accurate diagnosis, prognosis and precise treatment of AP. In this review, we summarized and addressed the metabolomics design and workflow in AP studies, as well as the results and analysis of the in-depth of research. Based on the metabolic profiling work in both clinical populations and experimental AP models, we described the metabolites with potential utility as biomarkers and the correlation between the altered metabolites and AP status. Moreover, the disturbed metabolic pathways correlated with biological function were discussed in the end. A practical understanding of current and emerging metabolomic approaches applicable to AP and use of the metabolite information presented will aid in designing robust metabolomics and biological experiments that result in identification of unique biomarkers and mechanisms, and ultimately enhanced clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
10
|
Buonocore MR, Germani U, Castellani D, Petrogiannopoulos L, Pallio S, Piciucchi M, Sbrozzi-Vanni A, Zullo A, Manta R. Timing of endoscopic therapy for acute bilio-pancreatic diseases: a practical overview. Ann Gastroenterol 2021; 34:125-129. [PMID: 33654349 PMCID: PMC7903577 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Diseases of the pancreas and hepatobiliary tree often require a therapeutic approach with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), generally following noninvasive imaging techniques. Appropriate indications and the correct timing for urgent ERCP would benefit both patients and clinicians and allow optimal utilization of health resources. Indications for urgent (<24 h) ERCP include severe acute cholangitis, acute biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis, biliary or pancreatic leaks, in the absence of percutaneous drainage, and severe acute cholecystitis in patients who are unfit for surgery and do not respond to conservative management. In patients who have severe acute biliary pancreatitis with ongoing biliary obstruction but without cholangitis, early (<48-72 h) ERCP is indicated. This overview aims to provide decisional flowcharts that can be easily used for managing patients with acute bilio-pancreatic disorders when they are referred to the Emergency Department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Rossano Buonocore
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Perugia (Matteo Rossano Buonocore, Ugo Germani, Danilo Castellani, Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos, Raffaele Manta)
| | - Ugo Germani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Perugia (Matteo Rossano Buonocore, Ugo Germani, Danilo Castellani, Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos, Raffaele Manta)
| | - Danilo Castellani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Perugia (Matteo Rossano Buonocore, Ugo Germani, Danilo Castellani, Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos, Raffaele Manta)
| | - Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Perugia (Matteo Rossano Buonocore, Ugo Germani, Danilo Castellani, Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos, Raffaele Manta)
| | - Socrate Pallio
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit "G. Martino", General Hospital Messina (Socrate Pallio)
| | - Matteo Piciucchi
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Orvieto (Matteo Piciucchi)
| | - Andrea Sbrozzi-Vanni
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Apuane General Hospital of Massa (Andrea Sbrozzi-Vanni)
| | - Angelo Zullo
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, "Nuovo Regina Margherita" Hospital, Rome (Angelo Zullo), Italy
| | - Raffaele Manta
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, General Hospital of Perugia (Matteo Rossano Buonocore, Ugo Germani, Danilo Castellani, Leonidas Petrogiannopoulos, Raffaele Manta)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Umans DS, Rangkuti CK, Sperna Weiland CJ, Timmerhuis HC, Bouwense SAW, Fockens P, Besselink MG, Verdonk RC, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic ultrasonography can detect a cause in the majority of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2020; 52:955-964. [PMID: 32557477 DOI: 10.1055/a-1183-3370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) has a 25 % pancreatitis recurrence rate. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may diagnose treatable causes of IAP and hence prevent recurrence. The goal of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS and its impact on recurrence. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for English studies on EUS in adults with IAP. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield. Secondary outcomes included recurrence. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 score. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled diagnostic yield and risk ratio with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model with inverse variance method. RESULTS 22 studies were included, with 1490 IAP patients who underwent EUS. Overall diagnostic yield was 59 % (874 /1490; 95 %CI 52 % - 66 %). The most common etiologies were biliary (429 /1490; 30 %, 95 %CI 21 % - 41 %) and chronic pancreatitis (271 /1490; 12 %, 95 %CI 8 % - 19 %). In 2 % of patients, neoplasms were detected (45 /1490; 95 %CI 1 % - 4 %). There was no difference in yield between patients with or without recurrent IAP before EUS (risk ratio 0.89, 95 %CI 0.71 - 1.11). CONCLUSIONS EUS is able to identify a potential etiology in the majority of patients with IAP, detecting mostly biliary origin or chronic pancreatitis, but also neoplasms in 2 % of patients. EUS may be associated with a reduction of recurrence rate. Future studies should include complete diagnostic work-up and preferably include patients with a first episode of IAP only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devica S Umans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos K Rangkuti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christa J Sperna Weiland
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hester C Timmerhuis
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Umans DS, Timmerhuis HC, Hallensleben ND, Bouwense SA, Anten MPG, Bhalla A, Bijlsma RA, Boermeester MA, Brink MA, Hol L, Bruno MJ, Curvers WL, van Dullemen HM, van Eijck BC, Erkelens GW, Fockens P, van Geenen EJM, Hazen WL, Hoge CV, Inderson A, Kager LM, Kuiken SD, Perk LE, Poley JW, Quispel R, Römkens TE, van Santvoort HC, Tan AC, Thijssen AY, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, Voorburg AM, van Wanrooij RL, Witteman BJ, Verdonk RC, Besselink MG, van Hooft JE. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnostic work-up of idiopathic acute pancreatitis (PICUS): study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035504. [PMID: 32819938 PMCID: PMC7440829 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) remains a dilemma for physicians as it is uncertain whether patients with IAP may actually have an occult aetiology. It is unclear to what extent additional diagnostic modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are warranted after a first episode of IAP in order to uncover this aetiology. Failure to timely determine treatable aetiologies delays appropriate treatment and might subsequently cause recurrence of acute pancreatitis. Therefore, the aim of the Pancreatitis of Idiopathic origin: Clinical added value of endoscopic UltraSonography (PICUS) Study is to determine the value of routine EUS in determining the aetiology of pancreatitis in patients with a first episode of IAP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PICUS is designed as a multicentre prospective cohort study of 106 patients with a first episode of IAP after complete standard diagnostic work-up, in whom a diagnostic EUS will be performed. Standard diagnostic work-up will include a complete personal and family history, laboratory tests including serum alanine aminotransferase, calcium and triglyceride levels and imaging by transabdominal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography after clinical recovery from the acute pancreatitis episode. The primary outcome measure is detection of aetiology by EUS. Secondary outcome measures include pancreatitis recurrence rate, severity of recurrent pancreatitis, readmission, additional interventions, complications, length of hospital stay, quality of life, mortality and costs, during a follow-up period of 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION PICUS is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Five medical ethics review committees assessed PICUS (Medical Ethics Review Committee of Academic Medical Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Radboud University Medical Center, Erasmus Medical Center and Maastricht University Medical Center). The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands Trial Registry (NL7066). Prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devica S Umans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research and Development, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hester C Timmerhuis
- Research and Development, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nora D Hallensleben
- Research and Development, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule Gf Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Abha Bhalla
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rina A Bijlsma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marja A Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Menno A Brink
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander MC, Amersfoort, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, North Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UMCG, Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Brechje C van Eijck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - G Willemien Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Hazen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal V Hoge
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, Limburg, The Netherlands
| | - Akin Inderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, LUMC, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M Kager
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Lars E Perk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Eh Römkens
- Department of Gastroenteroloy and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan Citl Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Y Thijssen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Annet McJ Voorburg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht Zeist Doorn, Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Roy Lj van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei, Ede, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schepers NJ, Hallensleben NDL, Besselink MG, Anten MPGF, Bollen TL, da Costa DW, van Delft F, van Dijk SM, van Dullemen HM, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Eijck CHJ, Erkelens GW, Erler NS, Fockens P, van Geenen EJM, van Grinsven J, Hollemans RA, van Hooft JE, van der Hulst RWM, Jansen JM, Kubben FJGM, Kuiken SD, Laheij RJF, Quispel R, de Ridder RJJ, Rijk MCM, Römkens TEH, Ruigrok CHM, Schoon EJ, Schwartz MP, Smeets XJNM, Spanier BWM, Tan ACITL, Thijs WJ, Timmer R, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, Vleggaar FP, van de Vrie W, Witteman BJ, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bruno MJ. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (APEC): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020; 396:167-176. [PMID: 32682482 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30539-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains unclear whether urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with biliary sphincterotomy improves the outcome of patients with gallstone pancreatitis without concomitant cholangitis. We did a randomised trial to compare urgent ERCP with sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment in patients with predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis. METHODS In this multicentre, parallel-group, assessor-masked, randomised controlled superiority trial, patients with predicted severe (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score ≥8, Imrie score ≥3, or C-reactive protein concentration >150 mg/L) gallstone pancreatitis without cholangitis were assessed for eligibility in 26 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based randomisation module with randomly varying block sizes to urgent ERCP with sphincterotomy (within 24 h after hospital presentation) or conservative treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of mortality or major complications (new-onset persistent organ failure, cholangitis, bacteraemia, pneumonia, pancreatic necrosis, or pancreatic insufficiency) within 6 months of randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN97372133. FINDINGS Between Feb 28, 2013, and March 1, 2017, 232 patients were randomly assigned to urgent ERCP with sphincterotomy (n=118) or conservative treatment (n=114). One patient from each group was excluded from the final analysis because of cholangitis (urgent ERCP group) and chronic pancreatitis (conservative treatment group) at admission. The primary endpoint occurred in 45 (38%) of 117 patients in the urgent ERCP group and in 50 (44%) of 113 patients in the conservative treatment group (risk ratio [RR] 0·87, 95% CI 0·64-1·18; p=0·37). No relevant differences in the individual components of the primary endpoint were recorded between groups, apart from the occurrence of cholangitis (two [2%] of 117 in the urgent ERCP group vs 11 [10%] of 113 in the conservative treatment group; RR 0·18, 95% CI 0·04-0·78; p=0·010). Adverse events were reported in 87 (74%) of 118 patients in the urgent ERCP group versus 91 (80%) of 114 patients in the conservative treatment group. INTERPRETATION In patients with predicted severe gallstone pancreatitis but without cholangitis, urgent ERCP with sphincterotomy did not reduce the composite endpoint of major complications or mortality, compared with conservative treatment. Our findings support a conservative strategy in patients with predicted severe acute gallstone pancreatitis with an ERCP indicated only in patients with cholangitis or persistent cholestasis. FUNDING The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Fonds NutsOhra, and the Dutch Patient Organization for Pancreatic Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
| | - Nora D L Hallensleben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus and Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - David W da Costa
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Foke van Delft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sven M van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - G Willemien Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, Netherlands
| | - Nicole S Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Erwin J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Janneke van Grinsven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frank J G M Kubben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert J F Laheij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Rogier J J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marno C M Rijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, Netherlands
| | - Carola H M Ruigrok
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Xavier J N M Smeets
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Willem J Thijs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robin Timmer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wim van de Vrie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Olaf J Bakker
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paul J. Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Severity Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis. Prague Med Rep 2020; 121:65-86. [DOI: 10.14712/23362936.2020.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing over time. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is established by revised Atlanta criteria (2012). Multiple criteria and scoring systems have been used for assessment of severity of AP. Majority of acute pancreatitis cases (80%) are mild, the challenge remains in early diagnosis, severity assessment and treatment of severe AP and its complications. Assessment of severity of AP is important part of management because line of treatment depends on aetiology and severity of acute pancreatitis. In this article a comprehensive review of recent advances in diagnosis and severity assessment of acute pancreatitis has been described.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is an inflammation of the glandular parenchyma of the retroperitoneal organ that leads to injury with or without subsequent destruction of the pancreatic acini. This inflammatory process can either result in a self-limited disease or involve life-threatening multiorgan complications. Chronic pancreatitis consists of endocrine and exocrine gland dysfunction that develops secondary to progressive inflammation and chronic fibrosis of the pancreatic acini with permanent structural damage. Recurrent attacks of acute pancreatitis can result in chronic pancreatitis; acute and chronic pancreatitis are different diseases with separate morphologic patterns. Acute pancreatitis has an increasing incidence but a decreasing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman Y Hammad
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Michael Ditillo
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Lourdes Castanon
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shah AP, Mourad MM, Bramhall SR. Acute pancreatitis: current perspectives on diagnosis and management. J Inflamm Res 2018; 11:77-85. [PMID: 29563826 PMCID: PMC5849938 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s135751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The last two decades have seen the emergence of significant evidence that has altered certain aspects of the management of acute pancreatitis. While most cases of acute pancreatitis are mild, the challenge remains in managing the severe cases and the complications associated with acute pancreatitis. Gallstones are still the most common cause with epidemiological trends indicating a rising incidence. The surgical management of acute gallstone pancreatitis has evolved. In this article, we revisit and review the methods in diagnosing acute pancreatitis. We present the evidence for the supportive management of the condition, and then discuss the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis. Based on the evidence, our local institutional pathways, and clinical experience, we have produced an outline to guide clinicians in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adarsh P Shah
- Department of Surgery, Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee HS, Chung MJ, Park JY, Bang S, Park SW, Song SY, Chung JB. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not superior to early ERCP in acute biliary pancreatitis with biliary obstruction without cholangitis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190835. [PMID: 29401491 PMCID: PMC5798765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is a common diagnosis worldwide, with gallstone disease being the most prevalent cause (50%). The American College of Gastroenterology recommends urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (within 24 h) for patients with biliary pancreatitis accompanied by cholangitis. Most international guidelines recommend that ERCP be performed within 72 h in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, but the optimal timing for endoscopy is controversial. We investigated the optimal timing for ERCP in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, and whether performing endoscopy within 24 h is superior to performing it after 24 h. We analyzed the clinical data of 505 patients with newly diagnosed acute pancreatitis, from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2014. We divided the patients into two groups according to the timing of ERCP: < 24 h (urgent) and 24–72 h (early).Among the 505 patients, 73 were diagnosed with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis. The mean age of the patients was 55 years (range: 26–90 years). Bile duct stones and biliary sludge were identified on endoscopy in 45 (61.6%) and 11 (15.0%) patients, respectively. The timing of ERCP within 72 h was not associated with ERCP-related complications (P = 0.113), and the total length of hospital stay was not different between urgent and early ERCP (5.9 vs. 5.7 days, P = 0.174). No significant differences were found in total length of hospitalization or procedural-related complications, in patients with biliary pancreatitis and a bile duct obstruction without cholangitis, according to the timing of ERCP (< 24 h vs. 24–72 h).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Seung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Moon Jae Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seungmin Bang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Woo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Si Young Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Bock Chung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schepers NJ, Bakker OJ, Besselink MGH, Bollen TL, Dijkgraaf MGW, van Eijck CHJ, Fockens P, van Geenen EJM, van Grinsven J, Hallensleben NDL, Hansen BE, van Santvoort HC, Timmer R, Anten MPGF, Bolwerk CJM, van Delft F, van Dullemen HM, Erkelens GW, van Hooft JE, Laheij R, van der Hulst RWM, Jansen JM, Kubben FJGM, Kuiken SD, Perk LE, de Ridder RJJ, Rijk MCM, Römkens TEH, Schoon EJ, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, Tan ACITL, Thijs WJ, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, van de Vrie W, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG, Bruno MJ. Early biliary decompression versus conservative treatment in acute biliary pancreatitis (APEC trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2016; 17:5. [PMID: 26729193 PMCID: PMC4700728 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-1132-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Acute pancreatitis is mostly caused by gallstones or sludge. Early decompression of the biliary tree by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with sphincterotomy may improve outcome in these patients. Whereas current guidelines recommend early ERC in patients with concomitant cholangitis, early ERC is not recommended in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis. Evidence on the role of routine early ERC with endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients without cholangitis but with biliary pancreatitis at high risk for complications is lacking. We hypothesize that early ERC with sphincterotomy improves outcome in these patients. Methods/Design The APEC trial is a randomized controlled, parallel group, superiority multicenter trial. Within 24 hours after presentation to the emergency department, patients with biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis and at high risk for complications, based on an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE-II) score of 8 or greater, Modified Glasgow score of 3 or greater, or serum C-reactive protein above 150 mg/L, will be randomized. In 27 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, 232 patients will be allocated to early ERC with sphincterotomy or to conservative treatment. The primary endpoint is a composite of major complications (that is, organ failure, pancreatic necrosis, pneumonia, bacteremia, cholangitis, pancreatic endocrine, or exocrine insufficiency) or death within 180 days after randomization. Secondary endpoints include ERC-related complications, infected necrotizing pancreatitis, length of hospital stay and an economical evaluation. Discussion The APEC trial investigates whether an early ERC with sphincterotomy reduces the composite endpoint of major complications or death compared with conservative treatment in patients with biliary pancreatitis at high risk of complications. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN97372133 (date registration: 17-12-2012) Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1132-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, PO 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Olaf J Bakker
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marc G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, PO 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Erwin J M van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, HP 690, PO 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Janneke van Grinsven
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nora D L Hallensleben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, PO 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, PO 2500, 3430, EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Robin Timmer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Marie-Paule G F Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Franciscus Gasthuis, PO 10900, 3004, BA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Clemens J M Bolwerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 3-11, 2625, AD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Foke van Delft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hendrik M van Dullemen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, PO 30001, 9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - G Willemien Erkelens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gelre Hospital, PO 9014, 7300, DS, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert Laheij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, PO 90151, 5000, LC, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - René W M van der Hulst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kennemer Gasthuis, PO 417, 2000, AK, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen M Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Postbus 95500, 1090, HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank J G M Kubben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, 3079, DZ, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sjoerd D Kuiken
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Lucas Andreas Hospital, PO 9243, 1006, AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lars E Perk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Center Haaglanden, PO 432, 2501, CK Den Haag, The Netherlands.
| | - Rogier J J de Ridder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, PO 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marno C M Rijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, PO 90158, 4800, RK, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, PO 90153, 5200, ME 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, PO 1350, 5602, ZA, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Center, PO 1502, 3800, BM, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| | - B W Marcel Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, PO 9555, 6800, TA, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| | - Adriaan C I T L Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, PO 9015, 6500, GS, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem J Thijs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Martini Hospital, PO 30033, 9700, RM, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, PO 50000, 7500, KA, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim van de Vrie
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, PO 444, 3300, AK, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ben J Witteman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Gelderse Vallei Ede, PO 9025, 6710, HN, Ede, The Netherlands.
| | - Hein G Gooszen
- Department of Operating Rooms - Evidence Based Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, HP 690, PO 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Al-Maramhy H, Abdelrahman AI, Sawalhi S. Resistin is not an appropriate biochemical marker to predict severity of acute pancreatitis: A case-controlled study. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:15351-15357. [PMID: 25386084 PMCID: PMC4223269 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2013] [Revised: 02/16/2014] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess levels of serum resistin upon hospital admission as a predictor of acute pancreatitis (AP) severity.
METHODS: AP is both a common and serious disease, with severe cases resulting in a high mortality rate. Several predictive inflammatory markers have been used clinically to assess severity. This prospective study collected data from 102 patients who were diagnosed with an initial acute biliary pancreatitis between March 2010 and February 2013. Measurements of body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) were obtained and serum resistin levels were analyzed at the time of hospital admission using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, resistin levels were measured from a control group after matching gender, BMI and age.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (60 females and 42 males) were diagnosed with acute gallstone-induced pancreatitis. The mean age was 45 years, and mean BMI value was 30.5 kg/m2 (Obese, class I). Twenty-two patients (21.6%) had severe AP, while eighty-eight patients had mild pancreatitis (78.4%). Our results showed that BMI significantly correlated with pancreatitis severity (P = 0.007). Serum resistin did not correlate with BMI, weight or WC. Furthermore, serum resistin was significantly higher in patients with AP compared to control subjects (P < 0.0001). The mean resistin values upon admission were 17.5 ng/mL in the severe acute biliary pancreatitis group and 16.82 ng/mL in the mild AP group (P = 0.188), indicating that resistin is not an appropriate predictive marker of clinical severity.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that obesity is a risk factor for developing severe AP. Further, although there is a correlation between serum resistin levels and AP at the time of hospital admission, resistin does not adequately serve as a predictive marker of clinical severity.
Collapse
|
20
|
Does the presence of obesity and/or metabolic syndrome affect the course of acute pancreatitis?: A prospective study. Pancreas 2014; 43:565-70. [PMID: 24681879 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) is rising with increased prevalence of obesity, which exacerbates pancreatic injury. Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined as a cluster condition of cardiovascular risk factors, including hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and central obesity. We analyze if the presence of obesity and/or MS affects the course of pancreatitis. METHODS Data were collected from 140 patients with AP between January 2010 and February 2013. Anthropometric data, including body mass index and waist circumference, were measured. Biochemical tests were used including fasting glucose, triglyceride, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and total cholesterol level. Atlanta criteria, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Ranson scoring system were used to define severe AP. Patients were classified as having MS based on the International Diabetic Federation criteria. RESULTS The mean body mass index was 30.15 kg/m(2). Sixteen (11.4%) patients had severe AP, whereas 124 (88.6%) patients had mild AP. We found that 62.8% of patients with AP fulfilled the criteria of MS (P = 0.000). Body weight can be used to predict clinical severity of AP with significant P value (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The presence of MS in patients with pancreatitis is noticeable, but it does not affect the course of disease severity, whereas obesity correlates with pancreatitis severity.
Collapse
|
21
|
Schepers NJ, Besselink MGH, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Bruno MJ. Early management of acute pancreatitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27:727-43. [PMID: 24160930 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/11/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is the most common gastro-intestinal indication for acute hospitalization and its incidence continues to rise. In severe pancreatitis, morbidity and mortality remains high and is mainly driven by organ failure and infectious complications. Early management strategies should aim to prevent or treat organ failure and to reduce infectious complications. This review addresses the management of acute pancreatitis in the first hours to days after onset of symptoms, including fluid therapy, nutrition and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. This review also discusses the recently revised Atlanta classification which provides new uniform terminology, thereby facilitating communication regarding severity and complications of pancreatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolien J Schepers
- Department of Operation Rooms, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bouwense SA, Besselink MG, van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, Schepers NJ, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Brink MA, Bruno MJ, Consten EC, Dejong CH, van Duijvendijk P, van Eijck CH, Gerritsen JJ, van Goor H, Heisterkamp J, de Hingh IH, Kruyt PM, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Rosman C, Schaapherder AF, Scheepers JJ, Spanier MBW, Timmer R, Weusten BL, Witteman BJ, van Ramshorst B, Gooszen HG, Boerma D. Pancreatitis of biliary origin, optimal timing of cholecystectomy (PONCHO trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2012. [PMID: 23181667 PMCID: PMC3517749 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background After an initial attack of biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy minimizes the risk of recurrent biliary pancreatitis and other gallstone-related complications. Guidelines advocate performing cholecystectomy within 2 to 4 weeks after discharge for mild biliary pancreatitis. During this waiting period, the patient is at risk of recurrent biliary events. In current clinical practice, surgeons usually postpone cholecystectomy for 6 weeks due to a perceived risk of a more difficult dissection in the early days following pancreatitis and for logistical reasons. We hypothesize that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy minimizes the risk of recurrent biliary pancreatitis or other complications of gallstone disease in patients with mild biliary pancreatitis without increasing the difficulty of dissection and the surgical complication rate compared with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods/Design PONCHO is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, superiority multicenter trial. Patients are randomly allocated to undergo early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, within 72 hours after randomization, or interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 25 to 30 days after randomization. During a 30-month period, 266 patients will be enrolled from 18 hospitals of the Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint of mortality and acute re-admissions for biliary events (that is, recurrent biliary pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis, symptomatic/obstructive choledocholithiasis requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography including cholangitis (with/without endoscopic sphincterotomy), and uncomplicated biliary colics) occurring within 6 months following randomization. Secondary endpoints include the individual endpoints of the composite endpoint, surgical and other complications, technical difficulty of cholecystectomy and costs. Discussion The PONCHO trial is designed to show that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (within 72 hours) reduces the combined endpoint of mortality and re-admissions for biliary events as compared with interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy (between 25 and 30 days) after recovery of a first episode of mild biliary pancreatitis. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN72764151
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan A Bouwense
- Department of OR/Evidence Based Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, HP 690, PO 9101, Nijmegen HB 6500, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Use of Amylase and Alanine Transaminase to Predict Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis in a Population with High HIV Prevalence. World J Surg 2012; 37:156-61. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1801-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
24
|
Correlation between procalcitonin and intra-abdominal pressure and their role in prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2012; 12:337-43. [PMID: 22898635 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2012] [Revised: 05/14/2012] [Accepted: 05/15/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Early assessment of disease severity and vigilant patient monitoring are key factors for adequate treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to determine the correlation of procalcitonin (PCT) serum concentrations and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) as prognostic markers in early stages of AP. METHODS This prospective observational study included 51 patients, of which 29 had severe AP (SAP). Patients were evaluated with the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and PCT serum concentrations and IAP at 24 h from admission. PCT was measured three times in the 1st week of disease and three times afterward, while IAP was measured daily. PCT and IAP values correlated with each other, and also compared with APACHE II score and CRP values. RESULTS PCT, IAP, CRP values and APACHE II score at 24 h after hospital admission were significantly elevated in patients with SAP. There was significant correlation between PCT and IAP values measured at 24 h of admission, and between maximal PCT and IAP values. Sensitivity/specificity for predicting AP severity at 24 h after admission was 89%/69% for APACHE II score, 75%/86% for CRP, 86%/63% for PCT and 75%/77% for IAP. CONCLUSIONS Increased IAP was accompanied by increased PCT serum concentration in patients with AP. PCT and IAP can both be used as early markers of AP severity.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tse F, Yuan Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD009779. [PMID: 22592743 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009779.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role and timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in acute gallstone pancreatitis remains controversial. A number of clinical trials and meta-analyses have provided conflicting evidence. OBJECTIVES To systematically review evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the clinical effectiveness and safety of the early routine ERCP strategy compared to the early conservative management with or without selective use of ERCP strategy, based on all important, clinically relevant and standardized outcomes including mortality, local and systemic complications as defined by the Atlanta Classification (Bradley 1993) and by authors of the primary study, and ERCP-related complications in unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases and major conference proceedings up to January 2012, using the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs comparing the early routine ERCP strategy versus the early conservative management with or without selective use of ERCP strategy in patients with suspected acute gallstone pancreatitis. We included studies in which the population with acute gallstone pancreatitis was a subgroup within a larger group of patients. We only included studies involving only a selected subgroup of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis (actual severe pancreatitis) in subgroup analyses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors conducted study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment independently. Using intention-to-treat analysis with random-effects models, we combined dichotomous data to obtain risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed heterogeneity using the Chi² test and I² statistic. To explore sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a priori subgroup analyses according to predicted severity of pancreatitis, cholangitis, biliary obstruction, time to ERCP in routine ERCP strategy, use of selective ERCP in conservative management strategy, and risk of bias. To assess the robustness of our results, we carried out sensitivity analyses using different summary statistics (RR versus odds ratio (OR)) and meta-analytic models (fixed versus random-effects), and per-protocol analysis. We performed influence analysis by exclusion of each study. MAIN RESULTS Five RCTs comprising 644 participants were included in the main analyses. Two additional RCTs, comprising only patients with actual severe acute gallstone pancreatitis, were included only in subgroup analyses. There was statistical heterogeneity among trials for mortality, but not for other outcomes. In unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, there were no statistically significant differences between the two strategies in mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.03), local and systemic complications as defined by the Atlanta Classification (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.43; and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.11 respectively) and by authors of the primary study (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26; and RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.09 respectively). The results were robust to sensitivity and influence analyses except for systemic complications as defined by the Atlanta Classification. There was no evidence to suggest that the results were dependent on predicted severity of pancreatitis. Among trials that included patients with cholangitis, the early routine ERCP strategy significantly reduced mortality (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.68), local and systemic complications as defined by the Atlanta Classification (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.99; and RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.78 respectively) and by authors of the primary study (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87; and RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.82 respectively). Among trials that included patients with biliary obstruction, the early routine ERCP strategy was associated with a significant reduction in local complications as defined by authors of the primary study (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91), and a non-significant trend towards reduction of local and systemic complications as defined by the Atlanta Classification (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.07; and RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.02 respectively) and systemic complications as defined by authors of the primary study (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.01). ERCP complications were infrequent. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, there is no evidence that early routine ERCP significantly affects mortality, and local or systemic complications of pancreatitis, regardless of predicted severity. Our results, however, provide support for current recommendations that early ERCP should be considered in patients with co-existing cholangitis or biliary obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances Tse
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tse F, Yuan Y. Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
27
|
Trna J, Vege SS, Pribramska V, Chari ST, Kamath PS, Kendrick ML, Farnell MB. Lack of significant liver enzyme elevation and gallstones and/or sludge on ultrasound on day 1 of acute pancreatitis is associated with recurrence after cholecystectomy: a population-based study. Surgery 2011; 151:199-205. [PMID: 21975288 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2010] [Accepted: 07/06/2011] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a population-based study, we examined recurrence rates of acute pancreatitis (AP) after cholecystectomy performed to prevent recurrences of AP. METHODS We abstracted data from medical records of all Olmsted county residents who underwent cholecystectomy at Mayo Clinic for the management of presumed gallstone or idiopathic AP between 1990 and 2005 (n = 239). Based on (i) significantly elevated liver enzymes (≥threefold increase of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase) on day 1 and (ii) the presence of gallstones/sludge in the gall bladder, we categorized patients into 4 groups: A (i + ii), B (i but not ii), C (ii but not i), and D (neither i nor ii). Recurrence rates of AP after cholecystectomy were determined in all groups. RESULTS The median follow-up after cholecystectomy was 99 months (range, 8-220). AP recurred in 13 of 142 patients (9%) in group A, 1 of 17 patients (6%) in group B, 13 of 57 patients (23%) in group C, and 14 of 23 patients (61%) in group D (P < .0001 D vs. all other groups and P = .001 C vs. groups A and B). No difference was seen in recurrence rates in groups A vs. B (P = 1.0). Recurrences were more frequent in patients with normal liver enzymes (A + B vs. C + D; P = .000003) and in patients without sonographic evidence of gallstones/sludge (A + C vs. B + D; P = .0008). CONCLUSION When AP is associated with significantly elevated liver enzymes on day 1, recurrence rates after cholecystectomy are low (9%). However, postcholecystectomy recurrence rates of AP are high in those without such laboratory abnormalities (34%), especially in those without gall bladder stones/sludge (61%) on abdominal ultrasonography. Our results raise doubts about the efficacy of cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent AP in patients with the absence of either a significant elevation of liver tests on day 1 of AP or gallstones and/or sludge in the gall bladder on initial ultrasound examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Trna
- Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Establishing a biliary etiology in acute pancreatitis is clinically important because of the potential need for invasive treatment, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The etiology of acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) is multifactorial and complex. Passage of small gallbladder stones or biliary sludge through the ampulla of Vater seems to be important in the pathogenesis of ABP. Other factors, such as anatomical variations associated with an increased biliopancreatic reflux, bile and pancreatic juice exclusion from the duodenum, and genetic factors might contribute to the development of ABP. A diagnosis of a biliary etiology in acute pancreatitis is supported by both laboratory and imaging investigations. An increased serum level of alanine aminotransferase (>1.0 microkat/l) is associated with a high probability of gallstone pancreatitis (positive predictive value 80-90%). Confirmation of choledocholithiasis is most accurately obtained using endoscopic ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. This Review discusses the pathogenesis of ABP and the clinical techniques used to predict and establish a biliary origin in patients with suspected ABP.
Collapse
|
29
|
Anderson K, Brown LA, Daniel P, Connor SJ. Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12:342-7. [PMID: 20590910 PMCID: PMC2951823 DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00173.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of this study were to investigate the predictive value of an elevated level of alanine transaminase (ALT) for biliary acute pancreatitis (AP) and to reconsider the role of abdominal ultrasound (AUS). METHODS All patients admitted to Christchurch Public Hospital with AP between July 2005 and December 2008 were identified from a prospectively collected database. Peak ALT within 48 h of presentation was recorded. Aetiology was determined on the basis of history, AUS and other relevant investigations. RESULTS A total of 543 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with biliary AP had significantly higher median (range) ALT than those with non-biliary causes (200 units/l [63-421 units/l] vs. 33 units/l [18-84 units/l]; P < 0.001). An ALT level of >300 units/l had a sensitivity of 36%, specificity of 94%, positive predictive value of 87% and positive likelihood ratio of 5.6 for gallstones. An elevated ALT and negative AUS had a probability of 21-80% for gallstones. CONCLUSIONS An elevated ALT strongly supports a diagnosis of gallstones in AP. Abdominal ultrasound effectively confirms this diagnosis; however, a negative ultrasound in the presence of a raised ALT does not exclude gallstones. In some patients consideration could be given to proceeding to laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on ALT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2009; 17:60-9. [PMID: 20012326 DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0217-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2009] [Accepted: 09/01/2009] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In the care of acute pancreatitis, a prompt search for the etiologic condition of the disease should be conducted. A differentiation of gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis should be given top priority in its etiologic diagnosis because it is related to the decision of treatment policy. Examinations necessary for diagnosing gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis include blood tests and ultrasonography. Early ERCP/ES should be performed in patients with gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis if a complication of cholangitis and a prolonged passage disorder of the biliary tract are suspected. The treatment for bile duct stones with the use of ERCP/ES alone is not recommended in cases of gallstone-induced pancreatitis with gallbladder stones. Cholecystectomy for gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis should be performed using a laparoscopic procedure as the first option as soon as the disease has subsided.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kiriyama S, Gabata T, Takada T, Hirata K, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Hirota M, Kadoya M, Yamanouchi E, Hattori T, Takeda K, Kimura Y, Amano H, Wada K, Sekimoto M, Arata S, Yokoe M, Hirota M. New diagnostic criteria of acute pancreatitis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2009; 17:24-36. [PMID: 20012328 DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0214-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2009] [Accepted: 09/01/2009] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Practical guidelines for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis are presented so that a rapid and adequate diagnosis can be made. When acute pancreatitis is suspected in patients with acute onset of abdominal pain and tenderness mainly in the upper abdomen, the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is made on the basis of elevated levels of pancreatic enzymes in the blood and/or urine. Furthermore, other acute abdominal diseases are ruled out if local findings associated with pancreatitis are confirmed by diagnostic imaging. According to the diagnostic criteria established in Japan, patients who present with two of the following three manifestations are diagnosed as having acute pancreatitis: characteristic upper abdominal pain, elevated levels of pancreatic enzymes, and findings of ultrasonography (US), CT or MRI suggesting acute pancreatitis. Detection of elevated levels of blood pancreatic enzymes is crucial in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Measurement of blood lipase is recommended, because it is reported to be superior to all other pancreatic enzymes in terms of sensitivity and specificity. For measurements of the blood amylase level widely used in Japan, it should be cautioned that, because of its low specificity, abnormal high values are also often obtained in diseases other than pancreatitis. The cut-off level of blood pancreatic enzymes for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is not able to be set because of lack of sufficient evidence and consensus to date. CT study is the most appropriate procedure to confirm image findings of acute pancreatitis. Elucidation of the etiology of acute pancreatitis should be continued after a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. In the process of the etiologic elucidation of acute pancreatitis, judgment whether it is gallstone-induced or not is most urgent and crucial for deciding treatment policy including the assessment of whether endoscopic papillary treatment should be conducted or not. The diagnosis of gallstone-induced acute pancreatitis can be made by combining detection of elevated levels of bilirubin, transamylase (ALT, AST) and ALP detected by hematological examination and the visualization of gallstones by US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiki Kiriyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, 4-86 Minaminokawa, Ogaki, Gifu, 503-0864, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Diagnostic workup of patients with pancreatic diseases. Eur Surg 2009. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-009-0500-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
33
|
Alexakis N, Lombard M, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Smart HL, Gilmore I, Evans J, Hughes M, Garvey C, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP. When is pancreatitis considered to be of biliary origin and what are the implications for management? Pancreatology 2007; 7:131-41. [PMID: 17592225 DOI: 10.1159/000104238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is a disease caused by gallstones in 40-60% of patients. Identification of these patients is extremely important, since there are specific therapeutic interventions by endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or cholecystectomy. The combination of trans-abdominal ultrasound (stones in the gallbladder and/or main bile duct) and elevated serum alanine transaminase (circa >60 IU/l within 48 h of presentation) indicates gallstones as the cause in the majority of patients with acute pancreatitis. In the presence of a severe attack this is a strong indication for intervention by endoscopic sphincterotomy. The presence of a significant main bile duct dilatation is also strongly indicative of gallstones and should prompt the use of endoluminal ultrasonography: >8 mm diameter with gallbladder in situ, or >10 mm following cholecystectomy if aged <70 years and >12 mm, respectively, if > or = 70 years. In mild pancreatitis surgically fit patients should be treated by cholecystectomy, and intra-operative cholangiography, as pre-operative biliary imaging is not efficient in this setting. Patients who are not fit for cholecystectomy should undergo prophylactic endoscopic sphincterotomy to prevent further attacks. In the post-acute-phase, pancreatitis patients in whom the aetiology is uncertain should undergo endoluminal ultrasonography. Thisis the most sensitive method for the detection of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis and may reveal alternative aetiological factors such as a small ampullary or pancreatic cancer. A number of recent studies have shown that bile crystal analysis, a marker for microlithiasis, increases the yield of positive results over and above endoluminal ultrasonography, and should be considered as part of the modern investigative algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Alexakis
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, University of Liverpool, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Chris E Forsmark
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis in the western world. Most patients with ABP suffer a mild attack and are expected to make a full recovery. They can be managed supportively and undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC during their initial hospitalization to prevent recurrence. If necessary, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration can be performed. Otherwise, postoperative ERCP can be performed to remove common bile duct stones. Patients with severe ABP require ICU admission, close clinical monitoring, and aggressive fluid resuscitation. There is a bimodal mortality in severe ABP with most late deaths caused by septic complications. Antibiotics should be used judiciously and are usually warranted only in the presence of infection or sepsis. ERCP, +/- ES, should be performed when signs of cholangitis are present. Early ERCP should be considered in patients with severe ABP who do not improve clinically. CT scanning should be performed to assess for necrosis or peripancreatic fluid collections. Patients with no fluid collections can undergo cholecystectomy once their clinical condition improves. Patients with peripancreatic fluid collections should be followed with serial CT scans. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed once resolution of the fluid collection is documented. If fluid collections do not resolve after 6 weeks, patients should undergo concurrent cholecystectomy and fluid drainage procedures. Sterile necrosis can be closely monitored and does not require necrosectomy unless the patient's clinical status deteriorates. Patients with infected necrosis should undergo necrosectomy when they are clinically stable. After recovery from an attack of severe ABP, patients require close follow-up because late complications are common. Currently, no single test can establish the diagnosis or predict the severity of ABP. A prompt diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and clinical acumen. Recognizing patients with severe pancreatitis is an important priority because it affects the type and timing of intervention. The management of these patients requires close clinical observation and a multidisciplinary approach between the surgeon, radiologist, gastroenterologist, and intensivist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn D Larson
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555-0536, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kim YS, Kim Y, Kim SK, Rhim H. Computed tomographic differentiation between alcoholic and gallstone pancreatitis: Significance of distribution of infiltration or fluid collection. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12:4524-8. [PMID: 16874865 PMCID: PMC4125640 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i28.4524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of various computed tomography (CT) findings including distribution of infiltration or fluid collection in differentiating the major etiologies of acute pancreatitis.
METHODS: We reviewed 75 relatively severe cases of acute pancreatitis of alcoholic (n = 43) or biliary stone (n = 32) etiology having infiltration or fluid collection on CT. We compared the pancreatic size, CT grading, presence or absence of biliary calculi, and dilatation of pancreatic or bile duct. We also evaluated degree and the distribution of infiltration and fluid collection in each group.
RESULTS: The sizes of pancreas were not different between alcohol group and stone group. Alcohol group showed higher CT grading than stone group (P < 0.05). Presence of biliary stone and duct dilatation was statistically significant in differentiating etiology (P < 0.05). Alcohol group showed significantly prominent peripancreatic pathology than stone group only in left peritoneal compartment (P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION: Alcoholic pancreatitis tends to form more prominent peripancreatic changes than gallstone pancreatitis in relatively severe cases. This is evident on the anterior aspect of left abdomen. Although clinical history and some CT findings usually are a major determinant of the etiology, this pattern of peripancreatic pathology may have an ancillary role in determining the etiologies of acute pancreatitis in the equivocal cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Sun Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M. Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:1037-45. [PMID: 16733122 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2005] [Accepted: 02/11/2006] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In approximately 20% of patients with acute pancreatitis, a cause is not established by history, physical examination, routine laboratory testing, and abdominal imaging. For those with a single unexplained attack, the role of invasive evaluation with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is unsettled but has been generally limited to those patients with suspected bile duct stones or malignancy. Recent studies suggest that microlithiasis is causative in up to 75% of patients with an unexplained attack and gallbladder in situ, whereas sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is most prevalent in those with recurrent attacks who have previously undergone cholecystectomy. EUS has been shown to be highly accurate for the identification of gallbladder sludge, common bile duct stones, and pancreatic diseases. Given this apparent diagnostic utility, an EUS-based strategy may be a reasonable approach to evaluate patients with a single idiopathic attack. ERCP and sphincter of Oddi manometry should generally be reserved for patients with multiple unexplained attacks and negative EUS results, especially for those patients who have previously undergone cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Mel Wilcox
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Pancreaticobiliary Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alexakis N, Neoptolemos JP. Algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Scand J Surg 2005; 94:124-9. [PMID: 16111094 DOI: 10.1177/145749690509400208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Gallstones are the commonest cause of acute pancreatitis in developed countries. There is now a considerable evidence base consolidated by a series of systematic reviews, meta-analyses and guidelines that has established a clear algorithm for diagnosis and management. In the majority of patients the combination of ultrasonography and serum alanine transaminase > or = 60 iu/l < or = 48 hours of symptoms will identify gallstones as the cause. The simplest method of severity assessment is a high level of serum C-reactive protein (> 150 mg/l up to 72 hours after symptoms). In mild disease, all fit patients must undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography or if not fit for surgery then endoscopic sphincterotomy during the same admission to prevent further attacks. All patients with severe disease should undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy in less than 72 hours. Patients with > 30% necrosis should undergo fine needle aspiration for bacteriology. Necrosectomy is indicated for infected necrosis or sterile necrosis if there are persisting clinically significant symptoms. There is increasing evidence for the use of minimally invasive pancreatic necrosectomy. Enteral nutrition should be instituted whenever possible but antibiotics should be reserved for patients with proven sepsis. The presence of fungal infection requires active anti-fungal therapy. Patients with severe disease should undergo cholecystectomy at a later stage. Patients who have undergone necrosectomy require long-term follow-up because of delayed complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Alexakis
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Al-Bahrani AZ, Ammori BJ. Clinical laboratory assessment of acute pancreatitis. Clin Chim Acta 2005; 362:26-48. [PMID: 16024009 DOI: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2005] [Revised: 06/13/2005] [Accepted: 06/14/2005] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several biochemical markers in blood and urine have been investigated to establish their clinical application in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The relevant studies are reviewed and critically appraised. METHODS Medline and the World Wide Web were searched and the relevant literature was classified under the following categories: (1) diagnosis of AP and (2) prediction of: a) disease severity, b) pancreatic necrosis and its secondary infection, c) organ failure and death, and d) disease etiology. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Serum lipase is a more reliable diagnostic marker of AP than serum amylase. Urinary strip tests for trypsinogen activation peptide (TAP) and trypsinogen-2 provide a reliable early diagnosis of AP. Useful predictors of severity may include serum procalcitonin and urinary TAP and trypsinogen-2 on admission, serum interleukins-6 and -8 and polymorphonuclear elastase at 24 h, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) at 48 h. Other markers such as amyloid A and carboxypeptidase B activation peptide (CAPAP) need further investigation. Biochemical prediction of pancreatic necrosis requires 72 h to reach reliability and is impractical. However, the daily monitoring of serum procalcitonin provides a non-invasive detection of infected necrosis; the promising role of phospholipase A(2) in this regard requires further investigation. Early transient hypertransaminasemia reliably predicts biliary etiology, while serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin and trypsin may predict an alcoholic etiology.
Collapse
|
40
|
Hernandez V, Pascual I, Almela P, Añon R, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, Minguez M, Benages A. Recurrence of acute gallstone pancreatitis and relationship with cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:2417-23. [PMID: 15571590 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40896.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence of recurrence of gallstone pancreatitis, its clinical features, and the presence of prognostic factors of recurrence. METHODS From January 1, 2000 to August 31, 2003, 233 patients admitted with acute gallstone pancreatitis (AGP) were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into two groups: recurrent and nonrecurrent group. Clinical, analytical, radiological, prognostic parameters, and severity (Atlanta criteria) were assessed, along with the performance of cholecystectomy or endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Clinical features of recurrence were analyzed. Univariate (chi(2), Student's t-test) and multivariate tests were performed. Statistical significance was assumed if p < 0.05. RESULTS Two hundred and eighty-six attacks were identified. Forty-two patients (18.2%) recurred, suffering 53 recurrent attacks, which took place within 30 days in 23.3%. Patients who did not undergo surgery after the first attack had 31-fold risk of recurrence (OR = 31.5%, CI = 95%[7.22-137.84], p < 0.001). In patients not operated, recurrence was more frequent if ES was not performed (37.04%vs 0%, p= 0.019). Among patients with surgical risk, none who recurred underwent ES, compared with 27.9% of those who did not recur. Patients in the nonrecurrent group underwent cholecystectomy within the first 30 days or ES more frequently (31.2%vs 7.3%, p= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Recurrence of gallstone pancreatitis is a frequent event. Delay of cholecystectomy implies an increased risk of recurrence. ES could be an acceptable option to prevent recurrence in patients who are not candidates for surgery or who do not desire to undergo cholecystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicent Hernandez
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|