Vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy in patients undergoing hemodialysis for associated end-stage renal failure

Factors related to postoperative vitreous hemorrhage after small-gauge vitrectomy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients

BACKGROUND

The role of anticoagulation or antiplatelet on post-vitrectomy vitreous hemorrhage (POVH) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is rarely investigated in the small-gauge vitrectomy era. We investigate the relationship between the long-term use of those medications and POVH in a group of PDR patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out in a group of PDR patients who underwent small-gauge vitrectomy in our center. The baseline data on diabetes, diabetic complications, long-term use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, ocular findings, and vitrectomy details were collected. The occurrence of POVH was recorded during at least three-month follow-up. Factors related to POVH were analyzed using logistic analysis.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 16 weeks, 5% (11/220) of patients had POVH, and 75 had received antiplatelet or anticoagulation agents before the operation. Factors related to persistent POVH were the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation agents (5.98, 1.75-20.45, p = 0.004), the presence of myocardial revascularization (130.65, 3.53-4834.50, p = 0.008), the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with medicine (56.52, 1.99-1604.06, p = 0.018), and younger age (0.86, 0.77-0.96, p = 0.012). For those receiving preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulation agents, the probability of developing POVH was higher in the patients whose previous therapy was adjusted compared to those with continued therapy (p = 0.02 by Log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified long-term use of anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication, the presence of CAD, and younger age as three independent factors related to POVH. In PDR patients on long-term antiplatelet or anticoagulation medications, particular attention should be given to controlling intraoperative bleeding, and follow-up for POVH should be scheduled.

Ocular findings, surgery details and outcomes in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients with chronic kidney disease

Purpose

We investigated the influence of impaired renal function on fundus characteristics, pars-plana vitrectomy (PPV) details, and outcomes in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Design

A retrospective cohort study

Methods

We investigated a consecutive series of PDR patients who underwent PPV. The diabetic complications, previous photocoagulation, intravitreal injections before PPV, ocular findings during PPV, surgical details, short-term visual outcome and post-PPV complications were recorded and compared between patients with and without impaired renal function.

Results

149 patients had normal renal function (67.7%), and 71 (32.3%) patients had impaired renal function; 85.4% of patients were identified with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during the preoperative assessment. Impaired renal function was related to hypertension (3.40[1.58–7.29], p = 0.002), incomplete pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) (3.18[1.50–6.72], p = 0.002), severe fibrovascular membrane (8.19[3.43–19.54], p<0.001), and extensive retinal vascular closure (3.40[1.54–7.52], p = 0.002). There was a more frequent occurrence of severe intraoperative bleeding (56.3%, 32.2%, p = 0.001) and a higher percentage of intraocular subretinal fluid drainage (45.1%, 22.1%, p = 0.008) in patients with impaired renal function. The percentage of patients whose visual acuity (VA) increased was similar between the two groups (42.3%, 54.4%, p = 0.34).

Conclusions

In PDR patients, screening for CKD was required before PPV. PDR patients with impaired renal function tended to have more severe ischemic retinal conditions. Comparable PPV outcomes could be obtained in patients with and without impaired renal damage.

Relationship between renal function and prognosis of Chinese proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients undergoing the first vitrectomy: protocol for a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

China has the largest number of adults with diabetes aged 20-79 years (116.4 million) in 2019. Due to the socioeconomic condition or a lack of awareness of diabetic complications, many adults with diabetes have proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or renal function impairment at their first visit to the clinic for a sudden loss of vision, and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is required for their treatment. Risk factors for the outcomes and complications of PPV surgery in PDR patients have been widely explored in many epidemiological studies and clinical trials. However, few prospective studies have analysed the association between renal function and surgical outcomes in PDR.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-centre, prospective cohort study of PDR patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have definite indications for PPV surgery with or without renal function impairment. We will consecutively enrol PDR patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria from November 2020 to December 2023. Each participant will be followed up for at least 6 months after surgery. Clinical data from medical records and vitreous fluid will be collected.Demographic characteristics and study outcomes will be summarised using descriptive statistics. The variation will be described and evaluated using the χ² test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Generalise additive mixed models will be used to explore the association between the renal profile and surgical outcomes including BCVA, and retinal and choroidal microvasculature/microstructure. Multivariate ordinal regression analysis will be used to detect the independent association between renal profile and BCVA changes, and smooth curve fitting will be employed to briefly present the tendency.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has received ethical approval from the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Results of this trial will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at local and international meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2000039698.

Vitreous hemorrhage in diabetes patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing hemodialysis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

For diabetes patients undergoing hemodialysis, vitreous hemorrhage seems to be a hemodialysis-induced hemorrhagic complication because of the effect of systemic anticoagulation. However, it is unclear whether hemodialysis is associated with vitreous hemorrhage in diabetes patients. We therefore carried out this cohort study to clarify the relationship between hemodialysis and vitreous hemorrhage in diabetes patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. We compared the incidence of vitreous hemorrhage in non-vitrectomized proliferative diabetic retinopathy eyes between the hemodialysis group (145 eyes) and peritoneal dialysis group (36 eyes), which does not require the use of systemic anticoagulation (parallel-group study), and in hemodialysis patients in the 12-month period before and after the start of hemodialysis (before-after study). We also determined the risk factors for vitreous hemorrhage after the start of hemodialysis based on the patients' systemic and ophthalmic characteristics.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the first-year incidence of vitreous hemorrhage between the hemodialysis (23.4%) and peritoneal dialysis groups (22.2%, P = 1.000). The incidence of vitreous hemorrhage in the dialysis period (23.4%) was significantly lower than that in the predialysis period (35.2%, P = 0.008). Only application of panretinal photocoagulation within the 6 months immediately before hemodialysis was significantly associated with the incidence of vitreous hemorrhage after the start of hemodialysis (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodialysis therapy does not seem to be associated with a higher risk of vitreous hemorrhage in diabetes patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Surgical outcomes of vitrectomy surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in patients with abnormal renal function

PURPOSE

To analyse the influence of renal function on the outcomes of vitrectomy for tractional-related complications in cases of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

METHODS

Retrospective consecutive case series of 109 eyes that underwent vitreoretinal interventions for traction-related complications of severe PDR from 2014 to 2017. Data collected included patient demographics, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical complications, and systemic markers including HbA1c and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Renal function categories were defined as low (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²), medium (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and normal (eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73m ²).

RESULTS

A total of 109 eyes (56% (n = 61) female) were included in the study. Overall, mean baseline BCVA improved from 1.33 logMAR to 0.91 logMAR (p < 0.001) postoperatively. Patients with low eGFR had significantly worse baseline BCVA (p = 0.039) and demonstrated greater improvement in mean BCVA (p = 0.059). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that seven predictors explained 65.5% of the variance (R² = 0.655, F(11,97) = 16.7, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced renal function does not adversely affect visual outcomes of vitrectomy for traction-related complications of PDR.

A clinical analysis of vitrectomy for severe vitreoretinopathy in patients with chronic renal

Background

The recent advancement in the management of chronic renal failure (CRF) has significantly increased the longevity of the patients, which increase the incidence of severe vitreoretinopathy. The vitrectomy is highly risky in this particular group of patients due to their systemic comorbidity. The timing surgical intervention is usually delayed because of the systemic conditions. This study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 25-guage vitrectomy for severe vitreoretinopathy in the CRF patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 16 eyes of 16 CRF patients with severe vitreoretinopathy were undergone 25-guage vitrectomy in the department of Ophthalmology of the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from February 2015 to April 2017. The visual outcome, complications and perioperative medical management were documented and analyzed.

Results

The best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA)of fourteen eyes were lower than 20/200 preoperatively. Surgery duration ranged from 28 to 72 min, with a mean of 48.4 ± 13.6 min. During the surgery, 12 eyes were diagnosed with DR, while two them were complicated with tractional retinal detachment and one with branch retinal vein occlusion. Three eyes were diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion, and one eye was diagnosed with hypertensive retinopathy. Postoperative BCVA of six eyes ≥20/40, seven eyes ≥20/200, and three eyes < 20/200. BCVA of eight eyes improved more than three lines, three eyes improved two lines, and four eyes improved one line. BCVA decreased from hand movement to light perception in one patient who developed neovascular glaucoma two weeks after surgery.

Conclusion

In chronic renal failure patients with severe vitreoretinopathy, the well-planned minimally invasive vitrectomy is effective and safe. Additionally, careful management of the perioperative systemic conditions is important to improve the visual acuity and quality of life as well.

Hemodialysis with end-stage renal disease did not raise the risk of intracranial hemorrhage after a head injury

Background

Hemodialysis (HD) treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (HD^+ESRD) may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after a head injury (HI) for which heparin is used. However, the results of noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) in such patients are not always clear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of HD on the risk of ICH in ESRD patients and in controls without ESRD with HD (HD^−ESRD), and to determine whether to lower the threshold of head CT in HD^+ESRD patients after HI.

Methods

In this nationwide population-based study using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database, we enrolled 6938 HD^+ESRD HI patients for the case group and 13,876 randomly selected HD^−ESRD HI patients for the control group. Measures of the post-HI association between HD^+ESRD and ICH determined using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Five hundred sixty-eight (2.74 %) patients had post-HI ICH: 185 in the HD^+ESRD group (2.67 % of cases) and 383 were from the HD^−ESRD group (2.76 % of controls). Conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, stroke, cancer, and liver disease, HD^+ESRD patients had no higher odds of ICH (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.91; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.75–1.11) than did HD^−ESRD patients. In the subgroup analysis of immediate ICH, HD^+ESRD patients had lower odds than did HD^−ESRD patients (AOR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.56–0.94).

Conclusions

HD^+ESRD did not increase the post-HI risk of ICH. Therefore, it may not be necessary to lower the threshold of head CT in HD^+ESRD patients.

Use and safety of heparin-free maintenance hemodialysis in the USA

BACKGROUND

Although heparin is used to anticoagulate the extracorporeal circuit for most patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD), some patients undergo heparin-free HD. We describe the determinants of heparin-free HD and its association with adverse outcomes using data from a national dialysis provider merged with Medicare claims.

METHODS

We identified patients aged ≥67 years with no recent history of warfarin use who initiated maintenance HD from 2007 to 2008. We applied the Cox regression to a propensity score-matched cohort to estimate the hazards of all-cause mortality, bleeding (gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hemorrhagic stroke, other hemorrhage), atherothrombosis (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism).

RESULTS

Among 12 468 patients, 836 (6.7%) were dialyzed heparin-free. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke and lower hemoglobin and platelet counts were associated with higher odds of heparin-free HD. Heparin-free HD use also varied as much as 4-fold by facility region. We found no significant association of heparin-free HD with all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94-1.26], bleeding (HR 1.15; 95% CI: 0.83-1.60), atherothrombosis (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.31) or VTE (HR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.93-1.64) compared with HD with heparin.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient markers of increased risk of bleeding and facility region associated with heparin-free HD use. Despite the potential benefits of avoiding heparin use, heparin-free HD was not significantly associated with decreased hazards of death, bleeding or thrombosis, suggesting that it may be no safer than HD with heparin.

Use and safety of unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis

Anticoagulation is essential to hemodialysis, and unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most commonly used anticoagulant in the United States. However, there is no universally accepted standard for its administration in long-term hemodialysis. Dosage schedules vary and include weight-based protocols and low-dose protocols for those at high risk of bleeding, as well as regional anticoagulation with heparin and heparin-coated dialyzers. Adjustments are based largely on clinical signs of under- and overanticoagulation. Risks of UFH use include bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, hypertriglyceridemia, anaphylaxis, and possibly bone mineral disease, hyperkalemia, and catheter-associated sepsis. Alternative anticoagulants include low-molecular-weight heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors, heparinoids, and citrate. Anticoagulant-free hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis also are potential substitutes. However, some of these alternative treatments are not as available as or are more costly than UFH, are dependent on country and health care system, and present dosing challenges. When properly monitored, UFH is a relatively safe and economical choice for anticoagulation in long-term hemodialysis for most patients.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: The Safety of Heparins in End-Stage Renal Disease

In patients on chronic dialysis, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the most commonly used agent for anticoagulation of the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit, for hemodialysis catheter "locking" between dialysis treatments, and for nondialysis indications such as venous thromboembolic disease, peripheral vascular disease, and acute coronary artery disease. Potentially serious complications of UFH, such as hemorrhage, osteoporosis, and thrombocytopenia, have led to consideration of other options for anticoagulation, including low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs). LMWH can be used for anticoagulation of the hemodialysis circuit, but whether this has significant benefit compared to UFH remains to be proven. Because of the somewhat unpredictable risk of severe bleeding complications when LMWH is used for other indications in dialysis patients, UFH rather than LMWH is preferred for treatment of thromboembolic disease in these patients. DTIs have been used for anticoagulation in dialysis patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), with argatroban being the preferred agent if heparin-free hemodialysis cannot be performed. UFH still remains the preferred anticoagulant in the vast majority of dialysis patients requiring systemic anticoagulation and for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal hemodialysis circuit.

Intraocular pressure during haemodialysis: a review

OBJECTIVES

Although several works in the past have examined the effect of haemodialysis (HD) on intraocular pressure (IOP), reported findings, theories, and conclusions are very different. The objectives of this article are to resume the reported evidence of IOP changes during HD, to review the proposed hypothesis of HD influence on IOP, and to determine if ophthalmic examination is imperative in HD patients.

METHODS

We analysed the peer-reviewed English literature and selected all possible relevant articles.

RESULTS

The influence of HD on IOP is not clear, and even in recent studies opposite findings can be found.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies are needed to clarify the effects of HD on IOP. In patients with glaucoma or with predisposed narrow angles, or eyes with impaired aqueous outflow, the possibility of acute IOP rise during HD could be much more frequent than in normal patients. So in these patients, a more strict ophthalmic scheduled examination seems to be feasible.

Systemic considerations in the management of diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To highlight the systemic factors which affect onset and/or progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to emphasize the role and responsibilities of ophthalmologists and other eye care providers to ensure that appropriate systemic medical evaluation of the patient with diabetes is being pursued.

DESIGN

Literature review of publications relevant to diabetic retinopathy, blood glucose control, diabetes mellitus type, hypertension, renal disease, elevated serum lipids, exercise, pregnancy, anticoagulation, thrombolysis, smoking, anemia and antioxidant ingestion.

FINDINGS

Intensive blood glucose control and control of systemic hypertension reduce the risk of new onset DR and slow the progression of existing DR. Severe DR may be an indicator of renal disease while severe renal disease and its treatment can affect the progression of DR. Elevated serum lipids are associated with macular exudate and moderate visual loss. Certain types of excessive exercise in patients with advanced stages of retinopathy may aggravate vitreous hemorrhage. During pregnancy, DR should be monitored closely as transient progression of DR can occur. Therapeutic anticoagulation and thrombolysis are not contraindicated at any stage of DR. Anemia can result in progression of DR, smoking in general should be discouraged, and the role of antioxidant therapy requires further study.

CONCLUSIONS

Blindness from diabetic retinopathy is now largely preventable with timely detection and appropriate interventional therapy. Routine, repetitive, lifelong, expert clinical retinal examination is essential for the fundamental ophthalmic care of the patient with diabetes. However, diabetes mellitus is a systemic disease and thus optimal ophthalmic care must include diligent evaluation and treatment of concomitant systemic disorders that influence the development, progression and ultimate outcome of diabetic retinopathy. Optimization of these systemic considerations through an intensive, multi-disciplinary, healthcare team-based approach will maximize the ophthalmic and general health of these patients. Ophthalmologists and other eye care providers are critical members of this team with unique responsibilities to ensure that appropriate systemic medical evaluation is being pursued.

Prevention of intraocular pressure elevations during hemodialysis

Intraocular pressure (IOP) may rise during hemodialysis sessions in predisposed patients because of a rapid drop in osmolality at the blood compartment. A patient with diabetes had painful ocular episodes during hemodialysis that were associated with an IOP increase. We modified the dialysis parameters to prevent a rapid decrease in osmolality by creating conductivity and ultrafiltration profiles and adding a colloid solution at the beginning of the procedure. After instituting these changes, the patient became asymptomatic and did not have variations in IOP during the dialysis sessions.