Arteriovenous crossing dissection without separation of the retina vessels for treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion

Matched control study of visual outcomes after arteriovenous sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual outcomes of arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

The medical records of 45 eyes from 45 patients who had undergone vitrectomy surgery with arteriovenous sheathotomy for BRVO were studied. Forty-five eyes of 45 patients with a BRVO but without intervention were studied as the control group. The best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were compared between the two groups at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Improvement of best-corrected visual acuity was 0.42 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units in the sheathotomy group and 0.22 logMAR units in the control group (P=0.007). The mean postoperative central macular thickness was significantly thinner in the sheathotomy group at 1 month (P=0.01), but not at 3, 6, and 12 months (P=0.75, P=0.81, and P=0.46, respectively). Improvement of best-corrected visual acuity at 12 months was significantly correlated with baseline best-corrected visual acuity, age, duration of symptoms, and sheathotomy (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for BRVO improves best-corrected visual acuity significantly more than the natural course of the BRVO disease process.

Branch retinal vein occlusion: treatment modalities: an update of the literature

BACKGROUND

Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy and is considered to be an important cause of visual loss. In this review, our purpose is to update the literature about the treatment alternatives for branch retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Eligible papers were identified by a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, using the terms "branch retinal vein occlusion," "therapy," "intervention," "treatment," "vitrectomy," "sheathotomy," "laser," "anti-VEGF," "pegaptanib," "bevacizumab," "ranibizumab," "triamcinolone," "dexamethasone," "corticosteroids," "non-steroids," "diclofenac," "hemodilution," "fibrinolysis," "tPA," and "BRVO." Additional papers were also selected from reference lists of papers identified by the electronic database search.

RESULTS

Treatment modalities were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several treatment modalities for branch retinal vein occlusion and specifically for its complications, such as macular edema, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal neovascularization, and retinal detachment, including anti-aggregative therapy and fibrinolysis, isovolemic hemodilution, vitrectomy with or without sheathotomy, peripheral scatter and macular grid retinal laser therapy, non-steroid agents, intravitreal steroids, and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs).

Sheathotomy in complicated cases of branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To report the clinical experience and results of using a microsurgical technique to decompress the arteriovenous connection in complicated branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) combined with haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective, non-randomized, interventional case study of the surgical sheathotomy decompression procedure. We enrolled 12 patients (seven women, five men; median age 64 years) with BRVO and decreased visual acuity (VA) caused by haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia. The mean duration of thrombosis was 7 months (2-15 months). The patients were examined for pre- and postoperative best corrected VA (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and fundus photography. Ten patients were examined with fluorescein angiography and eight with ocular coherence tomography (OCT). Postoperative progression of cataract was recorded, as were other complications. The mean follow-up time was 20 months (8-39 months).

RESULTS

Best corrected VA had improved in nine patients, was unchanged in one patient and had deteriorated in two patients at the last follow-up. Noted complications were venous haemorrhage at surgery in five patients, retinal detachment in one patient and progression of cataract in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical treatment with sheathotomy of BRVO is a technically feasible procedure with few complications. Postoperative increased reperfusion could explain the resolution of macular haemorrhage, oedema and ischaemia, and may improve visual function in patients with this common vascular eye disease.

Branch retinal vein occlusion: pathogenesis, visual prognosis, and treatment modalities

In branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), abnormal arteriovenous crossing with vein compression, degenerative changes of the vessel wall and abnormal hematological factors constitute the primary mechanism of vessel occlusion. In general, BRVO has a good prognosis: 50-60% of eyes are reported to have a final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better even without treatment. One important prognostic factor for final VA appears to be the initial VA. Grid laser photocoagulation is an established treatment for macular edema in a particular group of patients with BRVO, while promising results for this condition are shown by intravitreal application of steroids or new vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy combined with removal of the internal limiting membrane may improve vision in eyes with macular edema which are unresponsive to or ineligible for laser treatment.

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for persistent macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of arteriovenous (AV) sheathotomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for persistent or recurrent macular edema after intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Twenty-two eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with recurrent macular edema underwent vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. All eyes had previous intravitreal triamcinolone injection and/or laser photocoagulation for macular edema. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery were compared.

Results

The mean preoperative BCVA (log MAR) were 0.79±0.29 and postoperative BCVA (log MAR) at 3 months was 0.57±0.33. And improvement of visual acuity ≥2 lines was observed in 10 eyes (45%). The mean preoperative fovea thickness measured by OCT was 595.22±76.83 µm (510-737 µm) and postoperative fovea thickness was 217.60±47.33 µm (164-285 µm).

Conclusions

Vitrectomy with AV sheathotomy can be one treatment option for the patients with recurrent macular edema in BRVO.

Long-term outcomes of vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy in branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term effect of vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

The study was a prospective, randomized, comparative, interventional case series of 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy for macular edema due to BRVO of <or=8 weeks' duration of symptoms. Eighteen eyes with arteriovenous sheathotomy (sheathotomy group) were compared with 18 eyes without sheathotomy (vitrectomy group). Main outcomes measures were best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness as evaluated by optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. Postoperative follow-up period ranged from 12 months to 45 months (31 months). Median best-corrected visual acuity significantly improved from 0.4 at baseline to 1.0 at the final visit in both groups, and there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity at any postoperative period between the groups. Of 16 patients with duration of symptoms of <4 weeks, those with arteriovenous sheathotomy had a tendency toward better visual outcomes than those without arteriovenous sheathotomy (P = 0.064). The central foveal thickness also significantly decreased after surgery in both groups, but the differences were not significant for the two groups at each time point. No patients had severe intraoperative and/or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that vitrectomy with or without arteriovenous sheathotomy may improve the long-term functional and tomographic outcomes for patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO. Although additional arteriovenous sheathotomy did not lead to a distinct functional benefit in this series, early surgical intervention may result in better visual outcomes.

Arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for branch retinal vein occlusion: report of a case with longterm follow-up

PURPOSE

To report the longterm follow-up of a case of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with vitrectomy and adventitial sheathotomy.

METHODS

A three-port vitrectomy was performed in a 55-year-old man with symptoms of BRVO of about 3 months' duration. After a core vitrectomy, the adventitial sheath of the affected arteriovenous crossing was dissected so that the anterior surface of the arteriole was freely exposed.

RESULTS

On the second postoperative day, visual acuity (VA) in the affected left eye had increased from preoperative 0.3 to 0.6. Within 6 months the fundus had almost normalized and vision improved to 1.0. Cataract surgery was performed about 2 years after the vitrectomy. At a follow-up 4 years and 11 months after the sheathotomy, VA was 1.0 and no signs of recurrence were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adventitial sheathotomy may improve vision in selected cases of BRVO. Further studies are necessary to determine the role of sheathotomy in the management of cases with BRVO.

Evaluation of arteriovenous crossing sheathotomy for decompression of branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To report the effects of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy on anatomical and functional improvements in patients with macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Pars plana vitrectomy and arteriovenous sheathotomy was performed on 11 patients with BRVO who had vision loss due to macular oedema. Ten patients with macular oedema due to BRVO and who have been treated with grid laser photocoagulation were included in the control group. The measurement of visual acuity with ETDRS chart was taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up in the study group and at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after grid laser in the control group.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative logMAR visual acuity was 0.84+/-0.3 in the surgical group and 1.06+/-0.4 in the control group. The postoperative mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.41+/-0.2, 0.40+/-0.2, 0.40+/-0.3, and 0.36+/-0.3 at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up, respectively. In the control group the postlaser mean logMAR visual acuity was 0.92+/-0.3, 0.87+/-0.4, 0.85+/-0.3, and 0.82+/-0.3 at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months follow-up, respectively. The improvements of visual acuity in both groups were statistically significant when compared to pretreatment (P=0.003 and P=0.007 at 9 months in the study and control group, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous sheathotomy for decompression of BRVO in patients who have vision loss due to macular oedema was safe and effective for anatomical and functional improvement and resulted in significantly better visual outcomes than a matched control group of laser-treated eyes.

Bevacizumab zur Therapie des sekundären Makulaödems nach venösen Gefäßverschlüssen

Application of VEGF inhibitors represents a treatment option for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion that targets the disease at the causal molecular level. First reports on intravitreal injections of bevacizumab show promising morphological and functional effects and demonstrate that bevacizumab is a potent antiedematous agent in this context. A significant reduction of the central retinal thickness followed by a rapid improvement of visual acuity may be achieved within days. In a pilot study with a review period of 3 months, we found a significant improvement of one or more lines in 93% and four or more lines in 27% of eyes. This was associated with a concomitant significant reduction in central retinal thickness, which, however, was not sustained by a single injection (64% reduction after 1 month and 28% after 3 months). No relevant adverse events were noted. The duration of action after intravitreal bevacizumab administration is currently unknown. Reinjections will be necessary to maintain a lasting beneficial effect. Prospective, controlled long-term studies are mandatory to develop standardized treatment protocols that allow a safe and effective application of this off-label therapy.

Arterio-venous dissection after isovolaemic haemodilution in branch retinal vein occlusion: a non-randomised prospective study

PURPOSE

The rationale for this pilot study was to add arterio-venous dissection (AVD) after unsuccessful medical treatment in a well-defined group of patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

In this prospective, interventional case series 35 consecutive patients with a visual acuity (VA) of 0.4 (logMar) or worse were scheduled for surgery within the first 3 months of the onset of BRVO. The study endpoint was VA 1 year after AVD. Secondary study endpoints were: correlation of VA and successful vessel dissection; complication rate; and number of additional surgical procedures within the first year of AVD.

RESULTS

Preoperative VA (logMar) was 0.82+/-0.05 (range 0.2-1.6). VA 6 weeks postoperatively was 0.54+/-0.06 (range 0-1.6), 3 months postoperatively 0.61+/-0.07 (0-1.56), 6 months postoperatively 0.74+/-0.08 (range 0-2) and 12 months postoperatively 0.55+/-0.07 (range 0.1-1.5). VA improved 1 year after AVD (p=0.0004). An improvement in VA did not depend on successful separation of the artery and the vein. Four patients had a retinal detachment, 19 patients needed cataract surgery within the first year of AVD. A total of 24 additional surgical procedures were needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BRVO may profit from AVD compared with a historical control group. Visual improvement was found irrespective of the successful dissection of vessels. The cataract formation rate and additional surgery was a shortcoming of the AVD procedure.

Transvitreal limited arteriovenous-crossing manipulation without vitrectomy for complicated branch retinal vein occlusion using 25-gauge instrumentation

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new technique, 25-gauge transvitreal limited arteriovenous-crossing manipulation without vitrectomy (LAM), for the treatment of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) complicated by macular hemorrhage and/or macular edema recalcitrant to grid laser photocoagulation.

METHODS

Twelve eyes of 12 patients underwent LAM for BRVO performed by a single surgeon (M.S.H.) using the 25-gauge nitinol flexible-extendable blunt pick. The presence or absence of intraoperative reperfusion visualization, pre- and postoperative visual acuity, macular thickness as measured by optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure, and lens status were evaluated.

RESULTS

Restoration of blood flow was noted in all patients and was based on intraoperative reestablishment of a red column of erythrocytes through the previously closed vessel. Mean visual acuity improved from 20/200 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [LogMAR] +/- SD, 1.00 +/- 0.32) preoperatively to 20/70 (LogMAR +/- SD, 0.56 +/- 0.28) (P = 0.0003) at the final visit. Eleven (92%) of 12 eyes had >or=2 lines of visual improvement. Five eyes (45%) had final visual acuity of 20/50 or better. Mean macular thickness +/- SD improved from 401.0 +/- 73.2 to 178.7 +/- 19.6 microm (P < 0.0001) at the final visit. No statistically significant difference was noted in cataract progression or intraocular pressure. Mean follow-up +/- SD was 49.9 +/- 19.6 weeks. All patients were observed for at least 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

LAM may achieve outcomes comparable with those of arteriovenous adventitial sheathotomy for complicated BRVO.