Antibiotics in the treatment of chronic staphylococcal osteomyelitis

Probenecid and food effects on flucloxacillin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVES

To measure the effect of probenecid, fasting and fed, on flucloxacillin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints.

METHODS

Flucloxacillin 1000 mg orally was given to 11 volunteers alone while fasting ('flucloxacillin alone'), and with probenecid 500 mg orally while fasting ('probenecid fasting') and with food ('probenecid fed'). Flucloxacillin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints were compared.

RESULTS

Probenecid, fasting and fed, increased free plasma flucloxacillin area under the concentration-time curve (zero to infinity) ∼1.65-fold (p < 0.01) versus flucloxacillin alone. Probenecid fed prolonged time to peak flucloxacillin concentrations ∼2-fold versus the other two regimens (p < 0.01). Probenecid fasting or fed increased free flucloxacillin concentrations exceeding 30%, 50% and 70% of the first 6, 8 and 12 h post-dose by 1.58- to 5.48-fold compared with flucloxacillin alone. As an example of this pharmacodynamic improvement, the probability of target attainment of free concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration for Staphylococcus aureus (0.5 mg/L) for 50% of a 6-hour dose interval was > 80% for flucloxacillin plus probenecid (fasting or fed) and < 20% for flucloxacillin alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Probenecid increased flucloxacillin exposure, with predicted pharmacodynamic effects greater than pharmacokinetic effects because of the altered shape of the concentration-time curve. Probenecid may improve the applicability of oral flucloxacillin regimens.

Oral amoxicillin-clavulanate for treating diabetic foot infections

AIM

To assess amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) for the oral therapy of diabetic foot infections (DFIs), especially for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis among 794 DFI episodes, including 339 DFO cases.

RESULTS

The median duration of antibiotic therapy after surgical debridement (including partial amputation) was 30 days (DFO, 30 days). Oral AMC was prescribed for a median of 20 days (interquartile range, 12-30 days). The median ratio of oral AMC among the entire antibiotic treatment was 0.9 (interquartile range, 0.7-1.0). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 178 DFIs (22%) overall recurred (DFO, 75; 22%). Overall, oral AMC led to 74% remission compared with 79% with other regimens (χ² -test; P = 0.15). In multivariate analyses and stratified subgroup analyses, oral AMC resulted in similar clinical outcomes to other antimicrobial regimens, when used orally from the start, after an initial parenteral therapy, or when prescribed for DFO.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral AMC is a reasonable option when treating patients with DFIs and DFOs.

Antibiotic treatment of osteomyelitis: what have we learned from 30 years of clinical trials?

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN

To determine the most appropriate approach to antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis, the medical literature for articles published from 1968 to 2000 was reviewed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three clinical trials in children and adults were identified using almost every antibiotic class. Most studies were non-comparative and the comparative trials involved relatively few patients. Publications generally did not provide clinically important information regarding infection staging or classification, surgical treatment provided, or the presence of orthopedic hardware. The median duration of follow-up after treatment was only 12 months. The clinical outcome was better for acute than chronic osteomyelitis in eight of the 12 studies allowing comparison. In the comparative trials, few statistically significant differences were observed between the tested treatments. In one small trial, the combination of nafcillin plus rifampin was more effective than nafcillin alone. In pediatric osteomyelitis, oral therapy with cloxacillin was more effective than tetracycline in one study, and oral clindamycin was as effective as parenteral anti-staphylococcal penicillins in another. In several investigations oral fluoroquinolones were as effective as standard parenteral treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy remains undefined, most investigators treated patients for about six weeks. Despite three decades of research, the available literature on the treatment of osteomyelitis is inadequate to determine the best agent(s), route, or duration of antibiotic therapy.

Antimicrobial treatment of chronic osteomyelitis

Chronic osteomyelitis has been a difficult problem for patients and the treating physicians. Appropriate antibiotic therapy is necessary to arrest osteomyelitis along with adequate surgical therapy. Factors involved in choosing the appropriate antibiotic(s) include infection type, infecting organism, sensitivity results, host factors, and antibiotic characteristics. Initially, antibiotics are chosen on the basis of the organisms that are suspected to be causing the infection. Once the infecting organism(s) is isolated and sensitivities are established, the initial antibiotic(s) may be modified. In selecting specific antibiotics for the treatment of osteomyelitis, the type of infection, current hospital sensitivity resistance patterns, and the risk of adverse reactions must be strongly appraised. Antibiotic classes used in the treatment of osteomyelitis include penicillins, beta-lactamase inhibitors, cephalosporins, other beta-lactams (aztreonam and imipenem), vancomycin, clindamycin, rifampin, aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, and new investigational agents including teicoplanin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and oxazolidinones. Traditional treatments have used operative procedures followed by 4 to 6 weeks of parenteral antibiotics. Adjunctive therapy for treating chronic osteomyelitis may be achieved by using beads, spacers, or coated implants to deliver local antibiotic therapy and/or by using hyperbaric oxygen therapy (once per day for 90-120 minutes at two to three atmospheres at 100% oxygen).

Hepatic and renal dysfunction following nafcillin administration

OBJECTIVE

To review four cases of combined hepatic and renal toxicity that may be associated with the administration of nafcillin in adults. This type of adverse event with the use of nafcillin has not been previously documented in the literature.

DATA SOURCES

References from pertinent articles are identified throughout the text.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nafcillin is a widely used penicillinase-resistant penicillin. In four patients receiving nafcillin doses greater than 9 g/24 hours, changes in renal and hepatic function markers were noted within 72 hours of the initiation of nafcillin therapy. Laboratory values returned toward baseline when nafcillin therapy was discontinued. Elevations in blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase have been previously described in the literature for penicillin-like agents other than nafcillin. The exact mechanism for such toxicities as well as patient risk factors have not been clearly established.

CONCLUSIONS

Caution should be taken when initiating nafcillin therapy. Evaluation of renal and liver function tests prior to initiating nafcillin therapy and within the first 72 hours appears warranted. If hepatic and/or renal toxicity is observed, discontinuation of nafcillin should be considered.

Oral therapy for orthopedic infections in children and adults

Literature and clinical experience in the treatment of both adult and pediatric osteomyelitis by oral antibiotics is reviewed. Antibiotics achieving adequate penetration into joint fluid and bone are listed. Particular discussion is given to penicillins, cephalosporins, and non-β-lactam antibiotics. Techniques for monitoring therapeutic effectiveness and patient compliance are noted.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of probenecid

A review of the clinical applications and of the disposition of probenecid in man, including drug interactions, is presented. Probenecid is the classical competitive inhibitor of organic acid transport in the kidney and other organs. There are 2 primary clinical uses for probenecid: as a uricosuric agent in the treatment of chronic gout and as an adjunct to enhance blood levels of antibiotics (such as penicillins and cephalosporins). Adsorption of probenecid is essentially complete following oral administration. The drug is extensively metabolised by glucuronide conjugation and by oxidation of the alkyl side chains; oxidation of the aromatic ring does not occur. The half-life of probenecid in plasma (4 to 12 hours) is dose-dependent. Renal excretion is the major route of elimination of the metabolites; excretion of the parent drug is minimal and is dependent on urinary pH. Probenecid and its oxidised metabolites are extensively bound to plasma proteins, mainly to albumin. Tissue concentrations (based on animal studies) are generally lower than plasma concentrations. Most of the drug-drug interactions involving probenecid are due to an effect on the kidney-block of transport of acidic drugs. Similarly probenecid affects the tubular secretion of a number of acidic endogenous substances by the kidney. Probenecid is also involved in the block of transport of acidic metabolites of catecholamines, for example homovanillic and hydroxyindoleacetic acids, in the brain. There are a number of analytical procedures for the assay of probenecid. These are based on spectrophotometry, spectrofluorometry, gas and liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay.