Atlanto-occipital hypermobility in subjects with Down's syndrome

Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Fusion in Pediatric Patients with Down Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Trisomy 21 or Down syndrome is associated with multiple orthopaedic manifestations. Although cervical instability is the most common spinal condition associated with Down syndrome, the prevalence of scoliosis has been estimated at 4.8% to 8.7%. Very few prior studies have documented the role of spinal fusion in this population, and all have included ≤10 patients.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with Down syndrome treated with spinal fusion between January 2009 and December 2019 was performed by cross-referencing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. Patients were followed for ≥2 years, with a mean follow-up of 3.77 years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected, and complications were documented using the Clavien-Dindo-Sink (CDS) classification.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were included: 96% had ≥1 medical comorbidities, including 16 (70%) with congenital heart disease, of whom 88% had previous cardiac surgery, and 10 (44%) with thyroid disorders. All 23 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion. The mean estimated blood loss was 617 ± 459 mL, the mean length of the surgical procedure was 290 ± 92.7 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 6.03 ± 2.91 days. The major Cobb angle measured 61.7° ± 17.6°, which corrected to 19.4° ± 14.8° (68.6% correction; p < 0.001), with well-maintained correction at 2 years of 22.0° ± 10.3° (64.3% correction; p = 0.158). Thirteen (57%) of 23 patients had a change in curve of >5°. There were no intraoperative complications; however, 12 patients (52%) sustained postoperative complications (e.g., need for reoperation, implant failure, and pulmonary complications), including 6 patients with CDS type 3 or 4 (e.g., wound dehiscence, late superficial abscess, pleural effusion, pseudarthrosis, and readmission for hypoxia). Four patients (17%) required a revision surgical procedure. One patient (4%) required an unplanned intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Although instrumented spinal fusion can effectively correct spinal deformity in these patients, complications are more frequent than in children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, with over half of patients sustaining a complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Association Between Radiographic and MRI Cervical Spine Parameters in Patients With Down Syndrome

Introduction

Many patients with Down syndrome (DS) develop upper cervical spine instability that may lead to spinal cord injury. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the spinal cord compression in MRI and the occipto-cervical instability evident on plain radiographs in a Japanese population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of cervical spine radiographs and MRI acquired from patients with DS was performed. Radiographic evaluation included measuring the atlanto-dental interval (ADI) and space available for the cord. The basion axial interval (BAI) and Weisel-Rothman (WR) measurements were taken to quantify occipto-axial (OA) and atlanto-occipital (AO) instability. These parameters were collected in patients both with (positive) and without (negative) spinal cord compression evident on MR imaging in a neutral position and the values were compared. In addition, we investigated the association between spinal cord compression and previously defined abnormal values with logistic regression analysis (abnormal values: ADI>6mm, SAC<14mm, BAI<-12mm or >5mm in neutral position).

Results

There were 17 patients in the positive group and 52 patients in the negative group. WR was 7.4 mm±6.0 in positive group and 8.6 mm±4.8 in negative group (p=0.31) in neutral position, 3.9 mm±5.4 and 6.3±5.0 (p=0.06) in flexion, and 7.0 mm±6.8 and 7.2 mm±4.8 (p=0.75) in extension, respectively. The difference in WR between flexion and extension was 3.1 mm ± 4.6 and 0.9 mm ± 3.8, respectively (p=0.15). All other parameters showed significant differences between the two groups excluding BAI in extension (p<0.05). In addition, abnormal values that significantly correlated with cord compression were ADI (odds ratio 42.3 p<0.01 95% CI 4.16-430.0) and SAC (odds ratio 31.90 p=0.013 95% CI 2.06-494.0).

Conclusions

These data suggest that OA and AA instability measured with ADI, SAC, and BAI are significantly associated with spinal cord compression in MRI; whereas instability measured with WR and DWR is not. In addition, the previously defined abnormal thresholds for the ADI and SAC can be used for screening the Japanese population.

Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein for revision cervical spine fusion in children with Down syndrome: a case series

OBJECTIVE

Patients with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome; DS) often have atlantoaxial instability (AAI), which, if severe, causes myelopathy and neurological deterioration. Children with DS and AAI who undergo cervical spine fusion have a high rate of nonunion requiring revision surgery. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is a TGF-β growth factor that is used to induce bone formation in spine fusion. Although previous studies in the adult population have reported no reduction in pseudarthrosis rates with the use of rhBMP-2, there is a lack of literature in the pediatric DS population. This study describes the use of rhBMP-2 in children with DS and AAI during revision to treat nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a cervical spine fusion database (n = 175) was conducted. This database included all cervical spine fusions using modern instrumentation at the authors' institution from 2002 to 2019. Patients with DS who underwent a revision utilizing rhBMP-2 were included in the study. The number of prior fusions, use of rhBMP-2 in fusions, length of stay, halo use, and surgical data were collected. Postoperative complications and length of follow-up were also recorded.

RESULTS

Eight patients (75% female) met the inclusion criteria. The average age at revision with rhBMP-2 was 11 years (range 3-19 years). All patients were diagnosed with nonunion after an initial cervical fusion. All revisions were posterior fusions of C1-2 (n = 2) or occiput to cervical (n = 6). All revisions included implant revisions, iliac crest bone grafting, and rhBMP-2 use. One patient required irrigation and debridement of an rhBMP-induced seroma. Another patient required return to the operating room to repair a dural tear. There were no neurological, infectious, airway, or implant-related complications. Revision utilizing rhBMP-2 achieved fusion in 100% (n = 8) of patients. The average length of follow-up was 42.6 months. All patients demonstrated solid fusion mass on the last radiograph.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first case series reporting the successful use of rhBMP-2 to facilitate cervical spine fusion in patients with DS after previous nonunion. In addition, few rhBMP-2-related postoperative complications occurred.

An Updated Algorithm for Radiographic Screening of Upper Cervical Instability in Patients With Down Syndrome

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of cervical spine images from 2006-2012 for the purposes of "screening" children with Down syndrome for instability.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a full series of cervical spine images including flexion/extension lateral (FEL) radiographs was needed to avoid missing upper cervical instability.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The best algorithm, measurements, and criteria for screening children with Down syndrome for upper cervical instability are controversial. Many authors have recommended obtaining flexion and extension views. We noted that patients who require surgical stabilization due to myelopathy or cord compression typically have grossly abnormal radiographic measurements on the neutral upright lateral (NUL) cervical spine radiograph.

METHODS

The atlanto-dental interval, space available for cord, and basion axial interval were measured on all films. The Weisel-Rothman measurement was made in the FEL series. Clinical outcome of those with abnormal measurements were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of NUL and FEL radiographs for identifying clinically significant cervical spine instability were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 240 cervical spine series in 213 patients with Down syndrome between the ages of 4 months and 25 years were reviewed. One hundred seventy-two children had an NUL view, and 88 of these patients also had FEL views. Only one of 88 patients was found to have an abnormal atlanto-dental interval (≥6 mm), space available for cord at C1 (≤14 mm), or basion axial interval (>12 mm) on an FEL series that did not have an abnormal measurement on the NUL radiograph. This patient had no evidence of cord compression or myelopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining a single NUL radiograph is an efficient method for radiographic screening of cervical spine instability. Further evaluation may be required if abnormal measurements are identified on the NUL radiograph. We also propose new "normal" values for the common radiographic measurements used in assessing risk of cervical spine instability in patients with Down syndrome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Down Syndrome Increases the Risk of Short-Term Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal abnormality and is associated with degenerative hip disease. Because of the recent increase in life expectancy for patients with this syndrome, orthopaedic surgeons are likely to see an increasing number of these patients who are candidates for total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 1998 to 2010, we compared the short-term adverse outcomes of THA among 241 patients with Down syndrome and a matched 723-patient cohort. Specifically, we assessed: (1) incidence of THA; (2) perioperative medical and surgical complications during the primary hospitalization; (3) length of stay; and (4) hospital charges.

RESULTS

The annual mean number of patients with Down syndrome undergoing THA was 19. Compared to matched controls, Down syndrome patients had an increased risk of perioperative (OR, 4.33; P<.001), medical (OR, 4.59; P<.001) and surgical (OR, 3.51; P<.001) complications during the primary hospitalization. Down syndrome patients had significantly higher incidence rates of pneumonia (P=.001), urinary tract infection (P<.001), and wound hemorrhage (P=.027). The mean lengths of stay for Down syndrome patients were 26% longer (P<.001), but there were no differences in hospital charges (P=.599).

CONCLUSION

During the initial evaluation and pre-operative consultation for a patient with Down syndrome who is a candidate for THA, orthopaedic surgeons should educate the patient, family and their clinical decision makers about the increased risk of medical complications (pneumonia and urinary tract infections), surgical complications (wound hemorrhage), and lengths of stay compared to the general population.

Total hip replacement in patients with Down syndrome and degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip

Dysplasia of the hip, hypotonia, osteopenia, ligamentous laxity, and mental retardation increase the complexity of performing and managing patients with Down syndrome who require total hip replacement (THR). We identified 14 patients (six males, eight females, 21 hips) with Down syndrome and degenerative disease of the hip who underwent THR, with a minimum follow-up of two years from 1969 to 2009. In seven patients, bilateral THRs were performed while the rest had unilateral THRs. The mean clinical follow-up was 5.8 years (standard deviation (sd) 4.7; 2 to 17). The mean Harris hip score was 37.9 points (sd 7.8) pre-operatively and increased to 89.2 (sd 12.3) at final follow-up (p = 1x10-9). No patient suffered a post-operative dislocation. In three patients, four hips had revision THR for aseptic loosening at a mean follow-up of 7.7 years (sd 6.3; 3 to 17). This rate of revision THR was higher than expected. Our patients with Down syndrome benefitted clinically from THR at mid-term follow-up.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1455–8.

Imaging of the craniovertebral junction anomalies in children

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is interposed between the unsegmented skull and the segmented spine; it is functionally unique as it allows the complex motion of the head. Because of its unique anatomy, numerous craniometric indices have been devised. Because of its complex embryology, different from that of the adjacent skull and spine, it is commonly the seat of malformations. Because of the mobility of the head, and its relative weight, the craniovertebral junction is vulnerable to trauma. Like the rest of the axial skeleton, it may be affected by many varieties of dysplasia. In addition, the bony craniovertebral junction contains the neural craniovertebral junction and its surrounding CSF: any bony instability or loss of the normal anatomic relationships may therefore compromise the neural axis. In addition, the obstruction of the meningeal spaces at this level can compromise the normal dynamics of the CSF and result in hydrocephalus and/or syringohydromyelia. To image the CVJ, plain X-rays are essentially useless. MR is optimal in depicting the soft tissues (including the neural axis) and the joints, as well as the bone itself. CT still may be important to better demonstrate the bony abnormalities.

Surgical challenges and clinical outcomes of total hip replacement in patients with Down’s syndrome

Down’s syndrome is associated with a number of musculoskeletal abnormalities, some of which predispose patients to early symptomatic arthritis of the hip. The purpose of the present study was to review the general and hip-specific factors potentially compromising total hip replacement (THR) in patients with Down’s syndrome, as well as to summarise both the surgical techniques that may anticipate the potential adverse impact of these factors and the clinical results reported to date. A search of the literature was performed, and the findings further informed by the authors’ clinical experience, as well as that of the hip replacement in Down Syndrome study group. The general factors identified include a high incidence of ligamentous laxity, as well as associated muscle hypotonia and gait abnormalities. Hip-specific factors include: a high incidence of hip dysplasia, as well as a number of other acetabular, femoral and combined femoroacetabular anatomical variations. Four studies encompassing 42 hips, which reported the clinical outcomes of THR in patients with Down’s syndrome, were identified. All patients were successfully treated with standard acetabular and femoral components. The use of supplementary acetabular screw fixation to enhance component stability was frequently reported. The use of constrained liners to treat intra-operative instability occurred in eight hips. Survival rates of between 81% and 100% at a mean follow-up of 105 months (6 to 292) are encouraging. Overall, while THR in patients with Down’s syndrome does present some unique challenges, the overall clinical results are good, providing these patients with reliable pain relief and good function.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A:41–5.

Total hip arthroplasty in Down syndrome patients: an improvement in quality of life: replacement arthroplasty in Down syndrome (RADS) study group

The purpose this study was to assess survival rates, clinical outcomes, and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in Down syndrome patients. We reviewed 26 total hip arthroplasties (21 patients) performed by four experienced hip surgeons. These patients had a mean age of 35 years and a mean follow-up of 106months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip scores, and radiographic evaluation for component fixation and migration was performed. The overall survival with aseptic failure as an endpoint was 85%. The mean Harris Hip score improved to 84 points at final follow-up. While these patients can be challenging to treat, excellent surgical technique and selective use of acetabular constraint can reliably provide patients with excellent pain-relief and improved function.

Review of cervical spine anomalies in genetic syndromes

STUDY DESIGN

Focused review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE

Assist spine specialists in diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine anomalies found in selected genetic syndromes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spine instability and/or stenosis are potentially debilitating problems in many genetic syndromes. These problems can be overlooked among the other systemic issues more familiar to clinicians and radiologists evaluating these syndromes. It is imperative that spine specialists understand the relevant issues associated with these particular syndromes.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed for cervical spine issues in 10 specific syndromes. The information is presented in the following order: First, the identification and treatment of midcervical kyphosis in Larsen syndrome and diastrophic dysplasia (DD). Next, the upper cervical abnormalities seen in Down syndrome, 22q11.2 Deletion syndrome, pseudoachondroplasia, Morquio syndrome, Goldenhar syndrome, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, and Kniest dysplasia. Finally, the chin-on-chest deformity of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.

RESULTS

Midcervical kyphosis in patients with Larsen syndrome and DD needs to be evaluated and imaged often to track deformity progression. Upper cervical spine instability in Down syndrome is most commonly caused by ligamentous laxity at C1 to C2 and occiput-C1 levels. Nearly 100% of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome have cervical spine abnormalities, but few are symptomatic. Patients with pseudoachondroplasia and Morquio syndrome have C1 to C2 instability related to odontoid dysplasia (hypoplasia and os odontoideum). Morquio patients also have soft tissue glycosaminoglycan deposits, which cause stenosis and lead to myelopathy. Severely affected patients with spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita are at high risk of myelopathy because of atlantoaxial instability in addition to underlying stenosis. Kniest syndrome is associated with atlantoaxial instability. Cervical spine anomalies in Goldenhar syndrome are varied and can be severe. Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva features severe, deforming heterotopic ossification that can become life-threatening.

CONCLUSION

It is important to be vigilant in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical spine anomalies in patients with genetic syndromes.

Pediatric cervical spine instability

Cervical spine instability in children is rare but not exceptional and may be due to many factors. Although it mostly occurs at the upper cervical spine, all vertebrae from the occiput to T1 may be involved. It may be acute or chronic, occurring secondary to trauma or due to congenital anomaly, skeletal or metabolic dystrophy or rheumatoid arthritis. It can be isolated or associated with other musculoskeletal or visceral anomalies. A thorough knowledge of embryology, anatomy, physiology and physiopathology of the cervical spine in children is essential to avoid pitfalls, recognize normal variants and identify children at risk of developing cervical spine instability and undertake the appropriate treatment.

Down syndrome in children: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon

Down syndrome, the result of trisomy of chromosome 21, is one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities. Patients have a characteristic facial appearance, variable levels of intelligence and self-care skills, and a variety of associated medical conditions. Orthopaedic manifestations occur frequently; most are related to hypotonia, joint hypermobility, and ligamentous laxity. Atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial hypermobility, as well as bony anomalies of the cervical spine, can produce atlanto-occipital and cervical instability. Methods of screening for this instability, particularly with regard to participation in sports, are a subject of controversy. Scoliosis, hip instability, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, patellar instability, and foot deformities are other musculoskeletal conditions found in patients with Down syndrome that can be challenging for the orthopaedic surgeon to treat.

Treatment of Down syndrome-associated craniovertebral junction abnormalities

OBJECT

Operative intervention for craniovertebral junction (CVJ) instability in patients with Down syndrome has become controversial, with reports of a low incidence of associated neurological dysfunction and high surgical morbidity rates. The authors analyzed their experience in light of these poor results and attempted to evaluate differences in management.

METHODS

Medical and radiographic records of 36 consecutive patients with Down syndrome and CVJ abnormalities were reviewed. The most common clinical complaints included neck pain (15 patients) and torticollis (12 patients). Cervicomedullary compression was associated with ataxia and progressive weakness. Hyperreflexia was documented in a majority of patients (24 cases), and 13 patients suffered from varying degrees of quadriparesis. Upper respiratory tract infection precipitated the presentation in five patients. Four patients suffered acute neurological insults after a minor fall and two after receiving a general anesthetic agent. Atlantoaxial instability was the most common radiographically observed abnormality (23 patients), with a rotary component present in 14 patients. Occipitoatlantal instability was also frequently observed (16 patients) and was coexistent with atlantoaxial dislocation in 15 patients. Twenty individuals had bone anomalies, the most frequent of which was os odontoideum (12 patients) followed by atlantal arch hypoplasia and bifid anterior or posterior arches (eight patients). Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical procedures without subsequent neurological deterioration, and a 96% fusion rate was observed. In five of 11 patients basilar invagination was irreducible and required transoral decompression. Overall, 24 patients enjoyed good or excellent outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this series highlight the clinicopathological characteristics of CVJ instability in patients with Down syndrome and suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with low surgical morbidity rates.

Instability of the craniovertebral junction and treatment outcomes in patients with Down's syndrome

Operative intervention for the treatment of instability at the craniovertebral junction in patients with Down's syndrome has become somewhat controversial because some authors have reported high surgery-related complication rates and suggested that the incidence of neurological abnormality associated with this abnormal motion may be low. In this report, the authors describe the clinical and radiographic findings in 33 patients treated at their institution. Common presenting symptoms included neck pain (14 patients), torticollis (12 patients), and myelopathy manifested as hyperreflexia (21 patients), or varying degrees of quadriparesis (11 patients). Four patients suffered acute neurological insults, two after receiving routine general anesthetics for minor surgical procedures and two other patients following minor falls. Atlantoaxial instability was the most common abnormality documented on radiography (22 patients). Atlantooccipital instability (15 patients) was also frequently observed and was coexistent with the presence of atlantoaxial luxations in 14 patients. A rotary component of the atlantoaxial luxation was present in 13 cases. In 17 patients bony anomalies were present, the most frequent of which was os odontoideum (10 patients). Twenty-four patients underwent operative intervention, and successful fusion was achieved in 23. In six of nine patients with basilar invagination, reduction was achieved with preoperative traction and thus avoided the need for ventral decompressive procedures. There were no cases of postoperative deterioration, and 22 patients made excellent or good recoveries. The results of this series highlight the clinicopathological phenomena of craniovertebral instability in patients with Down's syndrome and suggest that satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with a low rate of surgical morbidity.