Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3-L5

The Importance of Alignment in the Management of Thoracolumbar Trauma

Spinal injuries occur in 3% of all patients with trauma, most commonly in males, and often as a result of high-velocity impact followed by abrupt deceleration. The most affected region after spinal trauma is the thoracolumbar junction because of the anterior center of gravity at the T12-L1 vertebral level and the relatively stiff thoracic spine uniting with the mobile lumbar spine. Many classifications exist to guide the choice of operative versus nonoperative management of traumatic injuries at this site. However, the classifications do not consider the segmental alignment of the spine, an aspect that has been shown to improve quality of life in nontraumatic postoperative spinal patients. Ignoring this aspect of thoracolumbar management often contributes to the development of posttraumatic malalignment and other complications. This review recommends that a new or modified classification system accounts for sagittal segmental alignment factors, including the level of the injured vertebra, the number of affected adjacent levels, imaging techniques with better specificity and sensitivity, and assessment for osteoporosis. Case studies are included to show the importance of segmental sagittal alignment and the vertebral level on patient outcomes.

Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review

Background

Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF.

Methods

We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24.

Results

Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes.

Conclusions

A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.

Levels of 91 circulating inflammatory proteins and risk of lumbar spine and pelvic fractures and peripheral ligament injuries: a two-sample mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar spine and pelvic fractures(LPF) are combined with peripheral ligament injuries(PLI), frequently. It has been reported that the site of fracture injury is usually paralleled by the secretion of inflammatory proteins. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between 91 circulating inflammatory proteins and LPF and PLI by using a Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with 91 circulating inflammatory proteins, as exposures were selected from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). The genetic variant data for LPF and PLI as outcomes from the FinnGen consortium. The inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) method was utilized as the main analysis for exposures and outcomes. In addition, the final results were reinforced by the methods of MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode. The sensitivity analyses were used to validate the robustness of results and ensure the absence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. MR-Steiger was used to assess whether the causal direction was correct to avoid reverse causality.

RESULTS

This study has shown that Beta-nerve growth factor(Beta-NGF) and Interferon gamma(IFN-gamma) are both involved in the occurrence of LPF and PLI, and they are reducing the risk of occurrence(OR:0.800, 95%CI: 0.650-0.983; OR:0.723, 95%CI:0.568-0.920 and OR:0.812, 95%CI:0.703-0.937; OR:0.828, 95%CI:0.700-0.980). Similarly, Axin-1 and Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT-1A1) were causally associated with LPF(OR:0.687, 95%CI:0.501-0.942 and OR:1.178,95%CI:1.010-1.373). Furthermore, Interleukin-4(IL-4), Macrophage inflammatory protein 1a(MIP-1a), and STAM binding protein(STAM-BP) were causally associated with PLI(OR:1.236, 95% CI: 1.058-1.443; OR:1.107, 95% CI: 1.008-1.214 and OR:0.759, 95% CI: 0.617-0.933). The influence of heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were further excluded by sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides new insights into the relationship between circulating inflammatory proteins and LPF and PLI, and may provide new clues for predicting this risk.

Diagnostic Reliability of Computed Tomography in Predicting Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury in Traumatic Lower Lumbar Fracture

OBJECTIVE

Although magnetic resonance imaging is the primary modality of investigation for determining the extent of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injuries in lower lumbar fractures (LLF) (L3-L5), the reliability of computed tomography (CT) has not been well defined. The main objective of this study is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of combined CT findings for detecting PLC injury in patients with LLF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 108 patients who presented with traumatic LLF. CT parameters like loss of vertebral body height, local kyphosis, retropulsion of fracture fragment, interlaminar distance, interspinous distance, supraspinous distance, interpedicular distance, canal compromise, facet joint diastasis in axial images (FJDA) and facet joint diastasis in sagittal images (FJDS), and presence of lamina and spinous process fracture were calculated using axial and sagittal CT images. The presence or absence of PLC injury was determined using magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard.

RESULTS

Among 108 patients, PLC injury was identified in 57 (52.8%). On univariate analysis, local kyphosis, retropulsion of fracture fragment, interlaminar distance, interpedicular distance, FJDS, FJDA, and the presence of spinous process fracture were found to be significant (P < 0.05) in predicting PLC injury. Whereas on multivariate logistic regression analysis, FJDS (P = 0.039) and FJDA (P = 0.003) were found to be variables independently associated with PLC injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the various CT parameters, facet joint diastasis (FJDS > 4.2 mm and FJDA > 3.5 mm) is the most reliable factor in determining PLC injury.

Clinical Efficacy of Large-Channel Percutaneous Lumbar Endoscopic Decompression in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Secondary to Old Compression Fractures

OBJECTIVE

We sought to explore the clinical efficacy of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) secondary to old vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) treatment by large-channel percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression.

METHODS

Medical data for a total of 17 patients diagnosed with LSS secondary to OVCF and treated with large-channel percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in our institution from January 2019 to January 2021 were collected. The dural sac cross-sectional area and morphologic grading of the magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area were recorded. Lumbar spine stability was assessed using the White-Panjabi scoring system. Visual analog scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores were used to evaluate the surgical efficacy, and the SF-36 health questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life of patients. Type and probability of complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The operative segments of the enrolled patients were all in the lower lumbar spine. One-year follow-up post operation showed that the dural sac cross-sectional area was significantly enlarged compared with preoperation, and the morphologic grade was significantly improved (P < 0.05). There was no difference in White-Panjabi score between preoperation and postoperation (P > 0.05). Visual analog scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores at each follow-up time point after operation were higher than those before operation and were significantly improved (P < 0.05). The SF-36 health survey score at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that before operation (P < 0.05). The complication rate was 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Large-channel percutaneous lumbar endoscopic decompression has an evident clinical effect in the treatment of LSS secondary to OVCF and has little effect on the stability of the lumbar spine, which is worthy of clinical application.

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra: Case series and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) are rare injuries and typically occur because of high-energy axial compressive load. Their unique anatomy and biomechanical characteristics distinguish them from other lumbar spine injuries. To the best of our knowledge, the treatment strategies for L5 burst fractures have not been thoroughly described. The aims of this case series and systematic review were to highlight the treatment strategies and outcomes of the L5 burst fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of 8 patients treated for burst L5 fractures in our institution between 2005 and 2020. Additionally, a systematic review via PubMed and Cochrane Library databases according to PRISMA guidelines was performed to review L5 burst fractures treatment strategies. Only Articles in English with full text available were included. The references of the selected studies were checked to find all possible related articles. Treatment strategies were conservative, posterior segmental instrumentation and fixation (PSIF), PSIF with anterior corpectomy (AC), and PSIF with posterior corpectomy (PC). Outcomes measures included neurological status, radiological regional alignment, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1449 publications were found, and 29 articles were finally selected for analysis. Of those, 15 were retrospective case reports, and 14 were retrospective case series. One hundred and sixty-nine patients were found in the review. The author's eight cases were added to the found in the literature for a methodological quality assessment. There were 52 (29%) patients managed non-operative, and 125 (71%) underwent surgery. One-hundred-two patients were neurologically intact, of whom 46 were managed non-operative. Canal compromise in intact patients ranged between 20 and 90%. Posterior segmental fixation and instrumentation with decompression was the preferred surgical strategy in patients with neurological deficits. Patients with combined anterior column restoration and anterior approach showed vertebral height and lordosis restoration. A 79% of the operative treated group reported neurological improvement. Patients with pre-operative neurological deficit managed non-operative reported the highest rate of complications (33.3%).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of L5 burst fractures, neurological injuries have a promising prognosis after surgery and are not correlated with the degree of canal stenosis. The compromise of the L5 vertebra affects the sagittal balance and its restoration can be achieved with an anterior corpectomy. Nonoperative management can be considered in cases of reasonable alignment, and no neurologic deficit.

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Anterior and Posterior Approaches

Background

A thoracolumbar burst fracture (BF) is a severe type of compression fracture, which is the most common type of traumatic spine fractures. Generally, surgery is the preferred treatment, but whether the optimal approach is either an anterior or a posterior approach remains unclear. This study aims to determine whether either method provides an advantage.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, identifying studies comparing anterior versus posterior surgical approaches in patients with thoracolumbar BFs. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Seven studies were included.

Results

An operative time of 87.97 min (53.91, 122.03; p<0.0001) and blood loss of 497.04 mL (281.8, 712.28; p<0.0001) were lower in the posterior approach. Length of hospital stay, complications, reintervention rate, neurological outcomes, postoperative kyphotic angle, and costs were similar between both groups.

Conclusions

Surgical intervention is usually selected to rehabilitate patients with BFs. The data obtained from this study suggest that a posterior approach represents a viable alternative to an anterior approach, with various advantages such as a shorter operative time and decreased bleeding.

Traumatic low lumbar fractures: How often MRI changes the fracture classification or clinical decision-making compared to CT alone?

PURPOSE

To determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on fracture classification for low lumbar fractures (LLFs) compared to CT alone.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 41 consecutive patients with LLFs who underwent CT and MRI within 10 days of injury. Three reviewers classified all fractures according to AOSpine Classification and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification (TLISS). Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in MRI was defined by black stripe discontinuity and in CT by the presence of: vertebral body translation, facet joint malalignment, horizontal laminar or spinous process fracture, and interspinous widening. The proportion of patients with AO type A/B/C and with TLISS < 5 and ≥ 5 was compared between CT and MRI. We examined the overall accuracy and individual CT findings for PLC injury.

RESULTS

AO classification using CT was: AO type A in 26 patients (61%), type B in 7 patients (17%), and type C in 8 patients (22%). Seventeen patients (41%) had a TLISS ≥ 5 while 24 (59%) had TLISS < 5. The addition of MRI after CT changed the AO classification in only 2 patients (4.9%, 95% CI (0.6-16.5%) due to upgrade of type A to type B or vice versa, but did not change TLISS from < 5 to ≥ 5 [p< 0.0001; 95% CI (0.59, 0.77)].

CONCLUSIONS

CT was highly accurate (95%) for diagnosis of PLC injury in LLFs. Addition of MRI after CT did not change the AO classification or TLISS, compared to CT alone, thus suggesting limited additional value of MRI for PLC assessment or fracture classification.

Characteristics of Osteoporotic Low Lumbar Vertebral Fracture and Related Lumbosacral Sagittal Imbalance

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) usually occurs in the thoracolumbar region and rarely affects the low lumbar region. The characteristics of osteoporotic low lumbar fracture (OLLF) have not been reported. Lumbosacral sagittal balance plays an important role in preserving the normal physiologic function of the spine. However, it is unknown how lumbosacral parameters vary in patients with OLLF. The authors retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiologic characteristics of patients with OLLF and osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture (OTVF) who were treated at their institution. Vertebral height, local deformity angle, and visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively for both groups. The changes in lumbosacral parameters were measured for patients with OLLF. The results showed that OLLF was more likely to occur at L3 (53.66%) and that the prevalence of severe trauma (29.27%) was higher among patients with OLLF (P<.05). The most common morphologic type of the vertebrae affected by OLLF was biconcave (58.54%, P<.05). Patients who had OLLF showed an apparent increase in pelvic tilt and a decrease in local lordosis and sacral slope. Postoperatively, vertebral height, local deformity angle, and visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved compared with preoperative values (P<.05). Among patients with OLLF, local lordosis and sacral slope increased significantly, whereas pelvic tilt decreased significantly after percutaneous kyphoplasty. Restoration of local lordosis had a mean value of 6.29°±4.80°. These results indicate that OLLF has unique characteristics compared with OTVF and that it results in lumbosacral sagittal imbalance. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is effective and safe for the treatment of OLLF and plays an important role in postoperative improvement of sagittal imbalance. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e7-e12.].

Treatment Tactics for Patients with Isolated Injuries of the Fifth Lumbar Vertebra

The major management technique for lumbar burst fractures is transpedicular fixation (TPF). However, in relation to fractures of the L₅ vertebra, this tactic often has no advantages over conservative treatment, and, therefore, it is expected to be supplemented with anterior decompression and reconstruction of the anterior column of the L₅ vertebra.

The aim of the study was to determine the most optimal treatment tactics for patients with isolated burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra.

Isolated unstable burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra: functional and radiological outcome after posterior stabilization with reconstruction of the anterior column: About 6 cases and literature review

INTRODUCTION

L5 burst fractures represent a small percentage of all spine fractures. Treatment strategy has not yet been standardized. Anatomical features and their biomechanical characteristics create fracture patterns which differ from those at the thoracolumbar junction. The objective of this study was to evaluate L5 burst fracture surgical treatment outcomes after posterior stabilization and reconstruction of the anterior column.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six patients with fifth lumbar isolated unstable burst fractures were analyzed. Medical records, radiographs, and clinical scores were obtained. The results were evaluated based on restoration of vertebral body height, spinal lordosis/kyphosis, canal compromise and sagittal alignment at several phases of treatment.

RESULTS

No patient showed neurologic deterioration, regardless of treatment. The median preoperative anterior vertebral height was 41mm and postoperative was 48mm. The median preoperative kyphotic angle as measured by Cobb angle (local and regional) was 21.5 degrees and 33 degrees which improved respectively by 7.5 and 5.5 degrees following instrumentation. The median amount of backward protrusion of bony fragment into the canal was measured at 67% preoperatively and at 35% postoperatively. There were no pseudarthrosis and anterior arthrodesis solid fusion was visible in all cases. There were a sagittal alignment restoration. At one year of follow up, fusion was obtained in all the cases, all patients had minimal to moderate disability using Oswestry Disability Index. The ability to return to work revealed a good-to-excellent long-term result.

DISCUSSION

The results of treatment of 5th lumbar unstable burst fractures with posterior stabilization and reconstruction of the anterior column show benefit on durable functional outcome, spine stabilization and radiologic parameters.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF THORACOLUMBAR CORONAL SPLIT FRACTURES: FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT Objective To analyze the behavior of thoracolumbar fractures of the coronal split type using the finite element method. Methods Two comparative studies were conducted through simulation of coronal split fractures in a finite model in which the first lumbar vertebra (L1) was considered to be fractured. In the first case, the fracture line was considered to have occurred in the middle of the vertebral body (50%), while in the second model, the fracture line occurred in the anterior quarter of the vertebral body (25%). The maximum von Mises stress values were compared, as well as the axial displacement between fragments of the fractured vertebra. Results The stress levels found for the fracture located at half of the vertebral body were 43% higher (264.88 MPa x 151.16 MPa) than those for the fracture located at the anterior 25% of the vertebra, and the axial displacement of the 50% fractured body was also greater (1.19 mm x 1.10 mm). Conclusions Coronal split fractures located in the anterior quarter of the vertebral body incurred less stress and displacements and are more amenable to conservative treatment than 50% fractures occurring in the middle of the vertebral body. Level of Evidence III; Experimental study.

Delayed surgery in neurologically intact patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures: to reduce pain and improve quality of life

Background

This is a retrospective study on 18 patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures (TLJBF) A3 or A4 at computed tomography (CT) scan who referred to our hospital. To assess the surgical results in terms of pain and quality of life in a series of neurologically intact patients affected by TLJBF who underwent surgery after 3-4 months from the injury. In literature there is controversy if pain could be an indication for surgery in TLJBF and series of patients conservatively managed with success have been reported.

Methods

A retrospective study on 18 patients is reported. Patients included in this series were neurologically intact and affected by a TLJBF A3 or A4 at CT scan, the height of the burst vertebral body was >50%, spinal canal invasion was <30% and kyphosis deformity <30 degrees. Pain and quality of life were evaluated using graphic rating scale (GRS) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores on admission, at the clinical follow-up and in post-surgical period.

Results

Comparing pre- and post-operative EQ-5D, the scores had a statistically significant decrease after the operation (P<0.001) [pre-surgery EQ-5D was 2.60 (SD =0.67), post-surgery EQ-5D was 1.37 (SD =0.41)]. Also analyzing the EQ5D-VAS scores, the t-test revealed that surgery (P<0.01) improved the quality of life with statistically significance (EQ5D-VAS pre =43.89, SD =12.43 and EQ5D-VAS post =73.33, SD =10.84). Analyzing pre- and post-surgical GRS scores, the pain decreased significantly with the maximum mean difference among the 2nd and 3rd month before surgery and at 12 months after surgery (respectively D =5.444, P<0.001 and D =5.167, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Conservatively managed patients affected by TLJBF require a strict clinical follow-up since pain sometimes is present in the following months and it affects the quality of life. Surgery should be considered for these cases.

Management of Pediatric Posttraumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Body Burst Fractures by Use of Single-Stage Posterior Transpedicular Approach

PURPOSE

The posterior transpedicular approach (PTA) is a posterior approach that has the advantage of achieving circumferential arthrodesis by a single posterior-only approach. The purpose of this study was to analyze our experience with PTA in the management of pediatric traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures (TTLBFs).

METHODS

Consecutive pediatric patients (age ≤18 years) with TTLBFs treated with PTA for 6 years were included in this retrospective study. Correction of kyphotic deformity and change in neurologic status were analyzed to assess outcome. The Cobb angle and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade were used for this purpose.

RESULTS

There were 6 male and 8 female patients. Five patients had complete injury (ASIA-A), and 9 had incomplete injury. The mean Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score was 6.71. The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 14.71° and improved to -3.35° postoperatively (mean kyphosis correction -18.05°). Two of the patients experienced iatrogenic nerve root injury. There was 1 postoperative mortality due to complications unrelated to the surgery. The mean Cobb angle was -0.07° at the 32.2-month follow-up visit. Six patients experienced cage subsidence, but none required revision surgery. Postoperatively, 11 (78.5%) patients showed neurologic improvement, and none experienced deterioration. The average ASIA score improved from 2.5 to 3.78. A fusion rate of 100% (n = 12) was observed at the last follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that PTA is a feasible approach in selected pediatric patients with unstable traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures, with results comparable with those in the adult population. This study demonstrates in detail the procedure, along with the neurologic and radiologic outcomes of this approach in the pediatric population.

Predictors of Recovery After Conservative Treatment of AO-Type A Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Without Neurological Deficit

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, correlational, exploratory, clinical research.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors determining a patient's recovery after conservative treatment of compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The reported results of compression fractures are poor. These results are not influenced by the severity of compression, the fracture site, or the residual deformity. Otherwise, the factors that determine a patient's recovery are unknown.

METHODS

In 48 conservatively treated patients the preinjury versus the 12-month follow-up differences (Δ) in back pain (visual analogue scale for pain), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the Greenough and Fraser low back outcome scale were prospectively recorded. For these differences and for time lost from work and satisfaction, multiple linear regressions with combinations of 16 factors were performed.

RESULTS

At 1 year, patients with an income-insurance were 9% (P = 0.096) more disabled than those without. They reported a 15% less favorable global outcome and 27% less participation. Smokers were 13% (P = 0.010) more disabled and 11% (P = 0.044) less satisfied. With each increase of the AO-fracture type from A1 to A3 the disability was 8% worse. Patients with pre-existent chronic low back pain (CLBP) returned two points (on a visual analogue scale [VAS] pain total of 10) more closely (P = 0.041) to their preinjury pain level than those without but were 21% (P = 0.001) less satisfied. Our model offers an explanation for more than 25% of the variability of ΔODI and of the satisfaction. For sick leave, no significant predictors were found.

CONCLUSION

Smoking and insurance status are the strongest negative predictors for recovery. LBP patients returned more closely to their preinjury back pain level, but were less satisfied. The AO fracture type had a marked influence on disability, the sagittal deformity had not. The time lost from work did not depend on patient or injury-related factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Characteristics and clinical aspects of patients with spinal cord injury undergoing surgery

Objective

To identify the characteristics of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing surgery.

Methods

Previously, 321 patients with SCI were selected. Clinical and socio-demographic variables were collected.

Results

A total of 211 patients were submitted to surgery. Fall and injuries in the upper cervical and lumbosacral regions were associated with conservative treatment. Patients with lesions in the lower cervical spine, worse neurological status, and unstable injuries were associated with surgery. Individuals undergoing surgery were associated with complications after treatment. The authors assessed whether age influenced the characteristics of patients submitted to surgery. Subjects with <60 years of age were associated with motorcycle accidents and the morphologies of injury were fracture-dislocation. Elderly individuals were associated to fall, SCI in the lower cervical spine and the morphology of injury was listhesis. Subsequently, the authors analyzed the gender characteristics in these patients. Women who suffered car accidents were associated to surgery. Women were associated with paraparesis and the morphologic diagnosis was fracture-explosion, especially in the thoracolumbar transition and lumbosacral regions. Men who presented traumatic brain injury and thoracic trauma were related to surgery. These individuals had a worse neurological status and were associated to complications. Men and the cervical region were most affected, thereby, these subjects were analyzed separately (n = 92). The presence of complications increased the length of hospital stay. The simultaneous presence of morphological diagnosis, worst neurological status, tetraplegia, sensory, and motor alterations were associated with complications. Pneumonia and chest trauma were associated with mortality.

Conclusion

These factors enable investments in prevention, rehabilitation, and treatment.

Outcomes After Operative Management of Combat-Related Low Lumbar Burst Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

Report the 2-year operative and clinical outcomes of these service members with low lumbar fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The majority of spinal fractures occur at the thoracolumbar level, with fractures caudal to L2 accounting for only 1% of spine fractures. A previous report from this institution regarding combat-related spine burst fractures documented an increased incidence of low lumbar burst fractures in injured service members.

METHODS

Review of inpatient and outpatient medical records in addition to radiographs for all patients treated at our institution with combat-related burst fractures occurring at the L3-L5 levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 28.1± 7.2 underwent surgery for low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fractures. The mean number of thoracolumbar levels injured was 2.9 ± 1.4. Eleven patients had neurological injury, 4 of which were complete. The mean days to surgery were 16.8 ± 24.5. The mean number of levels fused was 4.3 ± 2.1, with fixation extending to the pelvis in 4 patients (17%). Fourteen (61%) patients had at least 1 postoperative complication, with 7 (30%) requiring reoperation. Five patients had a postoperative wound infection. Five patients had deep venous thromboses, 3 had pulmonary emboli. Mean clinical follow-up was 3.3± 2.2 years. At latest follow-up, all were separated from military service, 10 experienced persistent bowel/bladder dysfunction, 15 had lower extremity motor deficits, and 10 had documented persistent low back pain. Nineteen had chronic pain with 18 patients still taking pain medications and/or muscle relaxers.

CONCLUSION

Low lumbar burst fractures are a rare injury with an increased incidence in combat casualties engaged in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. We found a high rate of acute postoperative complications (61%), as well as a high reoperation rate (30%). At approximately 3 years of follow-up, most of these patients had persistent neurological symptoms and chronic pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Pedicle screw fixation for low lumbar burst fracture with grade 4 retrolisthesis without any neurological deficit

Burst fractures of the spine account for 14% of all spinal injuries. Lower lumbar burst fracture with retrolisthesis is a rare presentation of traumatic cause. Management of this type of fracture are controversial and depends on plenty of factors like age of patient, type of injury, neurological deficit, associated comorbit injury. Here we are discussing a rarest case of traumatic burst fracture of L4 vertebrae with grade 4 retrolysthesis of L4 on L5 vertebrae with severe secondary canal stenosis and neurologically intact, which was manage with pedicle screw fixation.

Can a Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Score Be Uniformly Applied from T1 to L5 or Are Modifications Necessary?

Study Design Literature review. Objective The aim of this review is to highlight challenges in the development of a comprehensive surgical algorithm to accompany the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Methods A narrative review of the relevant spine trauma literature was undertaken with input from the multidisciplinary AOSpine International Trauma Knowledge Forum. Results The transitional areas of the spine, in particular the cervicothoracic junction, pose unique challenges. The upper thoracic vertebrae have a transitional anatomy with elements similar to the subaxial cervical spine. When treating these fractures, the surgeon must be aware of the instability due to the junctional location of these fractures. Additionally, although the narrow spinal canal makes neurologic injuries common, the small pedicles and the inability to perform an anterior exposure make decompression surgery challenging. Similarly, low lumbar fractures and fractures at the lumbosacral junction cannot always be treated in the same manner as fractures in the more cephalad thoracolumbar spine. Although the unique biomechanical environment of the low lumbar spine makes a progressive kyphotic deformity less likely because of the substantial lordosis normally present in the low lumbar spine, even a fracture leading to a neutral alignment may dramatically alter the patient's sagittal balance. Conclusion Although the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System was designed to be a comprehensive thoracolumbar classification, fractures at the cervicothoracic junction and the lumbosacral junction have properties unique to these junctional locations. The specific characteristics of injuries in these regions may alter the most appropriate treatment, and so surgeons must use clinical judgment to determine the optimal treatment of these complex fractures.

The analysis of functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with low lumbar burst fractures

INTRODUCTION

Burst fractures of the low lumbar spine constitute approximately one percent of all lumbar fractures. There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment of low lumbar burst factures. We aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of conservative treatment in patients with low lumbar burst fracture.

METHODS

15 patients (11 males, 4 females; mean age 32±8) who had low lumbar spine burst fracture treated with a custom-moulded thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) with a thigh extension were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 22±6 months. 14 patients were neurologically intact and one had isolated nerve root injury. There were 24% type A fractures and 76% type B fractures according to the Denis classification system. Functional outcomes were evaluated by using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Radiographic outcome was analyzed by measuring anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, amount of canal retropulsion. Functional and radiographic outcomes were reviewed initially and at 1, 3, 6, 12 months, and at the latest follow-up. Functional and radiographic improvements were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The mean bracing period was 11.9±1.7 weeks. The mean initial ODI, SF-36, and VAS score of the patients was 78.3±9.6, 23.7±8.9, and 8.7±0.7, respectively. The mean ODI, SF-36, and VAS score of the patients at the final follow-up was 26.4±6.5, 68.1±11.2, and 2.8±1.7, respectively. The improvement in functional outcomes was measured to be significant (p<0.05 for ODI, SF-36 and VAS). The mean initial anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, amount of canal retropulsion was found to be 27.2%±9.6%, -6.8°±3.2°, 37.4%±10.2%, respectively. The mean anterior vertebral height loss, kyphosis angle, and amount of canal retropulsion at the final follow-up was 23.1%±.6.7%, -4.2°±2.4°, 19.6%±7.7%, respectively. Among the radiographic outcomes, only the amount of canal retropulsion improved statistically (p=0.042).

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment using a custom-moulded thoracolumbosacral orthosis with a thigh extension is a safe and effective method in patients with low lumbar spine burst fractures and can improve functional and radiographic outcomes.

Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management

OBJECT

The overall evidence for nonoperative management of patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures is unknown. There is no agreement on the optimal method of conservative treatment. Recent randomized controlled trials that have compared nonoperative to operative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits yielded conflicting results. By assessing the level of evidence on conservative management through validated methodologies, clinicians can assess the availability of critically appraised literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the level of evidence for the use of conservative management in traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the English literature over the past 20 years was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE). The inclusion criteria consisted of burst fractures resulting from a traumatic mechanism, and fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine. The exclusion criteria consisted of osteoporotic burst fractures, pathological burst fractures, and fractures located in the cervical spine. Of the studies meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, any study in which nonoperative treatment was used was included in this review.

RESULTS

One thousand ninety-eight abstracts were reviewed and 447 papers met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which 45 were included in this review. In total, there were 2 Level-I, 7 Level-II, 9 Level-III, 25 Level-IV, and 2 Level-V studies. Of the 45 studies, 16 investigated conservative management techniques, 20 studies compared operative to nonoperative treatments, and 9 papers investigated the prognosis of conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

There are 9 high-level studies (Levels I-II) that have investigated the conservative management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. In neurologically intact patients, there is no superior conservative management technique over another as supported by a high level of evidence. The conservative technique can be based on patient and surgeon preference, comfort, and access to resources. A high level of evidence demonstrated similar functional outcomes with conservative management when compared with open surgical operative management in patients who were neurologically intact. The presence of a neurological deficit is not an absolute contraindication for conservative treatment as supported by a high level of evidence. However, the majority of the literature excluded patients with neurological deficits. More evidence is needed to further classify the appropriate burst fractures for conservative management to decrease variables that may impact the prognosis.

Management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury

OPINION STATEMENT

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Clinical management in the acute setting needs to occur in the intensive care unit in order to identify, prevent, and treat secondary insults from local ischemia, hypotension, hypoxia, and inflammation. Maintenance of adequate perfusion and oxygenation is quintessential and a mean arterial pressure >85-90 mm Hg should be kept for at least 1 week. A cervical collar and full spinal precautions (log-roll, flat, holding C-spine) should be maintained until the spinal column has been fully evaluated by a spine surgeon. In patients with SCI, there is a high incidence of other bodily injuries, and there should be a low threshold to assess for visceral, pelvic, and long bone injuries. Computed tomography of the spine is superior to plain films, as the former rarely misses fractures, though caution needs to be exerted as occipitocervical dislocation can still be missed. To reliably assess the spinal neural elements, soft tissues, and ligamentous structures, magnetic resonance imaging is indicated and should be obtained within 48-72 h from the time of injury. All patients should be graded daily using the American Spinal Injury Association classification, with the first prognostic score at 72 h postinjury. Patients with high cervical cord (C4 or higher) injury should be intubated immediately, and those with lower cord injuries should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. However, in the acute setting, respiratory mechanics will be disrupted with any spinal cord lesion above T11. Steroids have become extremely controversial, and the professional societies for neurosurgery in the United States have given a level 1 statement against their use in all patients. We, therefore, do not advocate for them at this time. With every SCI, a spine surgeon must be consulted to discuss operative vs nonoperative management strategies. Indications for surgery include a partial or progressive neurologic deficit, instability of the spine not allowing for mobilization, correction of a deformity, and prevention of potential neurologic compromise. Measures to prevent pulmonary emboli from deep venous thromboembolisms are necessary: IVC filters are recommended in bedbound patients and low-molecular weight heparins are superior to unfractionated heparin. Robust prevention of pressure ulcers as well as nutritional support should be a mainstay of treatment. Lastly, it is important to note that neurologic recovery is a several-year process. The most recovery occurs in the first year following injury, and therefore aggressive rehabilitation is crucial.

Expectations of recovery and functional outcomes following thoracolumbar trauma: an evidence-based medicine process to determine what surgeons should be telling their patients

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to define the expected functional and health-related quality of life outcomes following common thoracolumbar injuries on the basis of consensus expert opinion and the best available literature. Patient expectations are primarily determined by the information provided by health care professionals, and these expectations have been shown to influence outcome in various medical and surgical conditions. This paper presents Part 2 of a multiphase study designed to investigate the impact of patient expectations on outcomes following spinal injury. Part 1 demonstrated substantial variability in the information surgeons are communicating to patients. Defining the expected outcomes following thoracolumbar injury would allow further analysis of this relationship and enable surgeons to more accurately and consistently inform patients.

METHODS

Expert opinion was assembled by distributing questionnaires comprising 4 cases representative of common thoracolumbar injuries to members of the Spine Trauma Study Group (STSG). The 4 cases included a thoracolumbar junction burst fracture treated nonoperatively or with posterior transpedicular instrumentation, a low lumbar (L-4) burst fracture treated nonoperatively, and a thoracolumbar junction flexion-distraction injury managed with posterior fusion. For each case, 5 questions about expected outcomes were posed. The questions related to the proportion of patients who are pain free, the proportion who have regained full range of motion, and the patients' recreational activity restrictions and personal care and social life limitations, all at 1 year following injury, as well as the timing of return to work and length of hospital stay. Responses were analyzed and combined with the results of a systematic literature review on the same injuries to define the expected outcomes.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 38 appropriate studies that met the preset inclusion criteria. Published data were available for all injuries, but not all outcomes were available for each type of injury. The survey was completed by 31 (57%) of 53 surgeons representing 24 trauma centers across North America (15), Europe (5), India (1), Mexico (1), Japan (1) and Israel (1). Consensus expert opinion supplemented the available literature and was used exclusively when published data were lacking. For example, 1 year following cast or brace treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture, the expected outcomes include a 40% chance of being pain free, a 70% chance of regaining pre-injury range of motion, and an expected ability to participate in high-impact exercise and contact sport with no or minimal limitation. Consensus expert opinion predicts reemployment within 4-6 months. The length of inpatient stay averages 4-5 days.

CONCLUSIONS

This synthesis of the best available literature and consensus opinion of surgeons with extensive clinical experience in spine trauma reflects the optimal methodology for determining functional prognosis after thoracolumbar trauma. By providing consistent, accurate information surgeons will help patients develop realistic expectations and potentially optimize outcomes.

Operative and nonoperative adverse events in the management of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a systematic review

Object

Thoracolumbar spine injuries are commonly encountered in patients with trauma, accounting for almost 90% of all spinal fractures. Thoracolumbar burst fractures comprise a high percentage of these traumatic fractures (45%), and approximately half of the patients with this injury pattern are neurologically intact. However, a debate over complication rates associated with operative versus nonoperative management of various thoracolumbar fracture morphologies is ongoing, particularly concerning those patients presenting without a neurological deficit.

Methods

A MEDLINE search for pertinent literature published between 1966 and December 2013 was conducted by 2 authors (G.G. and R.D.), who used 2 broad search terms to maximize the initial pool of manuscripts for screening. These terms were “operative lumbar spine adverse events” and “nonoperative lumbar spine adverse events.”

Results

In an advanced MEDLINE search of the term “operative lumbar spine adverse events” on January 8, 2014, 1459 results were obtained. In a search of “nonoperative lumbar spine adverse events,” 150 results were obtained. After a review of all abstracts for relevance to traumatic thoracolumbar spinal injuries, 62 abstracts were reviewed for the “operative” group and 21 abstracts were reviewed for the “nonoperative” group. A total of 14 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria for the operative group and 5 manuscripts that met criteria for the nonoperative group were included.

There were a total of 919 and 436 patients in the operative and nonoperative treatment groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to age, sex, and length of stay. The mean ages were 43.17 years in the operative and 34.68 years in the nonoperative groups. The majority of patients in both groups were Frankel Grade E (342 and 319 in operative and nonoperative groups, respectively). Among the studies that reported the data, the mean length of stay was 14 days in the operative group and 20.75 in the nonoperative group.

The incidence of all complications in the operative and nonoperative groups was 300 (32.6%) and 21 (4.8%), respectively (p = 0.1065). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to the incidence of pulmonary, thromboembolic, cardiac, and gastrointestinal complications. However, the incidence of infections (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, wound infection, and sepsis) was significantly higher in the operative group (p = 0.000875). The incidence of instrumentation failure and need for revision surgery was 4.35% (40 of 919), a significant morbidity, and an event unique to the operative category (p = 0.00396).

Conclusions

Due to the limited number of high-quality studies, conclusions related to complication rates of operative and nonoperative management of thoracolumbar traumatic injuries cannot be definitively made. Further prospective, randomized studies of operative versus nonoperative management of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine trauma, with standardized definitions of complications and matched patient cohorts, will aid in properly defining the risk-benefit ratio of surgery for thoracolumbar spine fractures.

Relationships between the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Spine System and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: an analysis of the literature

CONTEXT

The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System (TLICS) has been recently described to help surgeons in the decision-making process of thoracolumbar spinal trauma.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the potential relationships between the TLICS scores with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) Spine System and patient's neurological status.

METHODS

Literature analysis of the potential scored injuries in the TLICS system, based on its individual scores, its total score, and its suggested proposed treatment, correlating these with the AO system and neurological status.

RESULTS

Findings are presented according to the TLICS score. Patients with a TLICS 1-3 points, receiving conservative treatment, are AO type A injuries, generally neurologically intact. TLICS 4 group also included AO type A fractures, neurologically ranging from intact to complete spinal cord injury. TLICS 5-10 points includes AO type B and C injuries, regarding their neurological status, and burst fractures (AO type A) with concomitant neurological injury and most of the patients with incomplete deficits and cauda equina syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

As a general overview, according to the TLICS, patients without neurological deficit and with AO type A injuries are conservatively treated. AO type B and C injuries are managed surgically, with regard to neurological status. Patients with cauda equina or incomplete injuries also received a higher severity score. Controversies still exist regarding the management of unstable burst fractures without neurological status. The role of the posterior ligamentous complex status and the magnetic resonance imaging in the decision-making process require more clinical evidence.

Complications in minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures and tumors

PURPOSE

We propose to evaluate the complication rate in minimally invasive stabilization (MIS) for spine fractures and tumors, as a common alternative to open fusion and conservative treatment.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2010, 187 patients were treated by minimally invasive percutaneous fixation in 133 traumatic fractures and 54 primitive and/or secondary spine tumors. Complications were classified, according to the period of onset as intraoperative and postoperative, and according to the severity, as major and minor.

RESULTS

A total of 15 complications (8 %) were recorded: 5 intraoperative (3 %), 6 early postoperative (3 %) and 4 late postoperative (2 %); 6 were minor complications (3 %) and 9 were major complications (5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive stabilization of selected spine pathologies appears to be a safe technique with low complication rate and high patient satisfaction. MIS reduces hospitalization and allows a fast functional recovery improving the quality of life.

Complications in minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures

Minimally invasive stabilization of thoracic and lumbar fractures without neurologic involvement is becoming a more frequent alternative to open fusion and conservative treatment. The authors analyzed the complication rate and limits of this technique in a consecutive series of 99 patients (127 thoracolumbar vertebral fractures) who underwent this technique between May 2005 and November 2009. Eighty-three patients had only spine injuries, whereas 16 had polytrauma injuries (mean Injury Severity Score, 25.2). In these 16 patients, percutaneous fixation was performed as a damage control procedure. The most frequent construct was monosegmental: 1 level above and 1 level below the fractured vertebra. In the remaining 21 patients, multilevel construction was performed for multiple injuries. Complications were analyzed according to the period of onset (intra- and postoperative) and the severity (major and minor). Twelve (12%) complications were recorded: 4 (4%) were intraoperative, 6 (6%) were early postoperative, and 2 (2%) were late postoperative; 4 (4%) were minor and 8 (8%) were major. Mean follow-up was 52 months (range; 36-90 months). All patients except 1 were considered healed after 6-month follow-up. The failed patient had an initial kyphosis greater than 20°, and a posterior open reduction and fusion would have been more appropriate. Minimally invasive stabilization of selected spine injuries is a safe technique with a low complication rate. The main goal of this approach is a fast recovery time, so any complication leading to an extended length of stay should be considered severe. An adequate learning curve is important to minimize complications.

Association of clinical parameters of operatively treated thoracolumbar fractures with quality of life parameters

PURPOSE

The intention of the current work was to assess the association between clinical parameters and seven different quality of life (QoL) instruments after surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fractures after an average follow-up of 4.2 years.

METHODS

The following human-related quality of life and PRO measures of 66 patients were correlated to clinical parameters such as fingertip-to-floor distance (FFD), Schober measurement, pressure and percussion pain in the lumbopelvine area (PPP), and paravertebral muscle tension: reALOS, SF-36, VAS, VAS spine score, BDI, the GBB-24, and the IES-R.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a significant association between the clinical parameters of the thoracolumbar spine such as PPP, paravertebral muscle tension, FFD and Schober's sign on one side, and the seven tested instruments on the other side.

CONCLUSIONS

PPP and FFD as well as a small Schober measurement are clinical parameters which significantly influence QoL after surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Fratura tipo explosão da coluna torácica e lombar: correlação entre o segmento biomecânico sagital acometido e as alterações estruturais da vértebra fraturada

OBJETIVO: Analisar as fraturas tipo explosão da coluna torácica e lombar e fazer a correlação entre o segmento biomecânico sagital acometido e as alterações estruturais da vértebra fraturada. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo de 72 pacientes com fraturas tipo explosão da coluna torácica e lombar. O estreitamento do canal vertebral, o colapso vertebral e a cifose local foram avaliados em três segmentos distintos: torácico, transição toracolombar e lombar. RESULTADOS: Houve diferença estatística significativa (p < 0,05) dos valores do estreitamento do canal vertebral e cifose local nos diferentes segmentos da coluna vertebral avaliados. CONCLUSÃO: As fraturas tipo explosão da coluna torácica e lombar, embora apresentem características semelhantes, independentemente do local de ocorrência, sofrem influência direta do segmento biomecânico sagital no que diz respeito às alterações estruturais que ocorrem na vértebra fraturada.

Dose response and structural injury in the disability of spinal injury

INTRODUCTION

In traumatic injury there is a clear relationship between the dose of energy involved, structural tissue damage and resultant disability after recovery. This relationship is often absent in cases of non-specific chronic low back pain that is perceived by patients as attributed to a workplace injury. There are many studies assessing risk factors for non-specific low back pain. However, studies addressing causality of back pain are deficient.

PURPOSE

To establish whether there exists a causal relationship between structural injury, low back pain and spinal disability.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered validated spinal outcome measures [Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score (LBO), modified somatic perception (MSP), modified Zung depression index (MZD)] between patients with healed high energy thoracolumbar spinal fractures and patients with self-perceived work-related low back pain. Causality was established according to two of Bradford Hill's criteria of medical causality, temporal and dose-response relationships.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with spinal fractures (group 1) of average age 44 years were compared to 19 patients with self-reported back pain in the workplace pursuing claims for compensation (group 2) of average age 48 years. Both groups were comparable in terms of age and sex. The average ODI in group 1 was 28 % (SD 19) compared to 42 % (SD 19) in group 2 (P < 0.05). Similarly, LBOS was 39.7 versus 24.3 (P < 0.05), MSP 4.3 versus 9.3 (P < 0.05) and MZD 20.2 versus 34.8 (P < 0.05) in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite high-energy trauma and significant structural damage to the spine, patients with the high energy injuries had better spinal outcome scores in all measures. There is no 'dose-response' relationship between structural injury, low back pain and spinal disability. This is the reverse of what would be anticipated if structural injury was the cause of disability in workplace reported onset of low back pain.

Low lumbar burst fractures: a unique fracture mechanism sustained in our current overseas conflicts

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The most common location for burst fractures occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, where the stiff thoracic spine meets the more flexible lumbar spine. With our current military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have seen a disproportionate number of low lumbar burst fractures.

PURPOSE

To report our institutional experience in the management of low lumbar burst fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of medical records and radiographs for all patients treated at our institution with combat-related injuries and thoracolumbar fractures. We included all patients who had sustained a burst fracture from T12 to L5 and had at least 1-year clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients sustained burst fractures. Nineteen patients (59.4%) had low lumbar (L3-L5) burst fractures, and 12 patients (37.5%) had thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) burst fractures as their primary injury. Additionally, seven patients sustained less severe burst fractures at an additional level. One patient sustained burst fractures at both upper and lower lumbar levels. Of the low lumbar fractures, 52.6% had evidence of neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Similarly, in the upper lumbar group, 58.2% sustained a neurologic injury, two of which were complete. Twenty-two patients underwent surgical intervention, complicated by infection in 18%. At most recent follow-up, all but one patient with presenting neurologic injury had persistent deficits.

CONCLUSION

Low lumbar burst fractures are the predominant combat-related spine injury in our current military conflicts. The rigidity offered by current body armor may effectively lower the transition zone that normally occurs at the thoracolumbar junction, thereby, transferring forces into the lower lumbar spine. Increased awareness of this fracture pattern is warranted by all surgeons because of unique clinical challenges associated with its treatment. Although the incidence is increased in the military population, other surgeons may be involved with long-term care of these patients on completion of their military service.

Minimal invasive percutaneous fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures

We studied 122 patients with 163 fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine undergoing the surgical treatment by percutaneous transpedicular fixation and stabilization with minimally invasive technique. Patient followup ranged from 6 to 72 months (mean 38 months), and the patients were assessed by clinical and radiographic evaluation. The results show that percutaneous transpedicular fixation and stabilization with minimally invasive technique is an adequate and satisfactory procedure to be used in specific type of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures.

Neurological L5 burst fracture: posterior decompression and lordotic fixation as treatment of choice

PURPOSE

We report our experience and literature review concerning surgical treatment of neurological burst fractures of the fifth lumbar vertebra.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients with L5 neurological burst fractures were consecutively enrolled; 6 patients had complete motor deficits, and 12 had sphincter dysfunction. We performed 18 posterior and one combined approaches. To avoid kyphosis, posterior internal fixation was achieved by positioning patients on the operating table with hips and knees fully extended. At the latest follow-up (mean 22 months, range 10-66), neurological recovery, canal remodeling and L4-S1 angle were evaluated.

RESULTS

Vertebral body replacement was difficult, which therefore resulted in an oblique position of the cage. Vertebral bodies still remained deformed, even though fixation allowed for an acceptable profile (22°, range 20-35). We observed three cases of paralysis, five complete, and three incomplete recoveries. In the remaining eight patients, sphincter impairment was the only finding. In 15 patients, pain was absent or occasional; in four individuals, it was continuous but not invalidating. Remodeling was visible by X-ray and/or CT, without significant secondary stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The L5 burst fractures are rare and mostly due to axial compression. Cauda and/or nerve root injuries are absolute indications for surgery. If an anterior approach is technically difficult, laminectomy can allow for decompression, and it can be easily combined with transpedicular screw fixation. Posterior instrumented fusion, also performed with the aim to restore sagittal profile, when associated with an accurate spinal canal exploration and decompression, may be looked at as an optimal treatment for neurological L5 burst fractures.

Minimally invasive decompression with posterior column reinforcement for the treatment of symptomatic osteoporotic fracture with spinal stenosis in lumbar vertebrae

An osteoporotic fracture (OF) in the second to fifth lumbar vertebrae with spinal stenosis may be an indication for surgical treatment, but carries the risks of instability or instrumentation failure. Modified surgical procedures have been developed to manage patients with challenging OF. We retrospectively studied 12 patients (three male, nine female; mean age±standard deviation=73.5±7.2 years) who underwent minimally invasive decompression and posterior column reinforcement with polymethylmethacrylate. During a mean follow-up period of 24.8±3.1 months, pain severity and functional impairment were both significantly reduced, as measured by the visual analog scale and the Oswestry disability index. Nine patients (75%) experienced a satisfactory outcome while the other three (25%) were unchanged. Plain radiographs showed stable spinal alignment and immobilization of flexion-extension within the PMMA construct. Five complications were managed successfully, including one by revision surgery. These procedures are a feasible surgical option in the elderly population studied.

Screw Fixation without Fusion for Low Lumbar Burst Fracture : A Severe Canal Compromise But Neurologically Intact Case

The low lumbar spine is deeply located in flexible segments, and has a physiologic lordosis. Therefore, burst fractures of the low lumbar spine are uncommon injuries. The treatment for such injuries may either be conservative or surgical management according to canal compromise and the neurological status. However, there are no general guidelines or consensus for the treatment of low lumbar burst fractures especially in neurologically intact cases with severe canal compromise. We report a patient with a burst fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra, who was treated surgically but without fusion because of the neurologically intact status in spite of severe canal compromise of more than 85%. It was possible to preserve motion segments by removal of screws at one year later. We also discuss why bone fusion was not necessary with review of the relevant literature.

Estudio comparativo del tratamiento ortésico en las fracturas toraco-lumbosacras según la gravedad del trauma

OBJETIVO: Determinar si la gravedad del trauma en lesiones toracolumbosacras mayores estables permite decidir la selección del tipo de ortesis en un tratamiento ortopédico. MÉTODOS: Estudio Retrospectivo de casos 12/1990 - 12/2006 (16 años). Criterios de Selección: 1) Seguimiento mínimo: 2 años. 2) Estudios radiológicos convencionales completos. 3) Ausencia de Litigio. 4) Tratamiento ortésico con TLSO a medida para los traumas de alta energía cinética y con ortesis prefabricadas para los de baja energía. 5) Tratamiento efectuado o supervisado por el autor Sénior. Evaluación por observadores independientes de Parámetros Geométricos (ángulo de Cobb sagital, cifosis vertebral, grado de colapso vertebral) pretratamiento y seguimiento en Rx simple, y Parámetros Funcionales (Dolor según SRS, Índice de Oswestry, Retorno a la Actividad Previa). Subdivisión de los diferentes tipos de fracturas (según AO y Denis) en Alta (Grupo A) y Baja Energía [Grupo B] de acuerdo con la energía cinética del trauma. Comparación de Parámetros Geométricos con Grupo Control. Análisis Estadístico: chi cuadrado y t-test de Student. RESULTADOS: 41 pacientes (44 fracturas] tratados (23 mujeres/18 varones), con 25 fracturas Grupo "A", y 19 Grupo "B". Edad promedio: 46 años (12 - 83). Seguimiento promedio: 4,5 años (2.2 - 15.5). Localización predominante: T11 - L2. Tipos Predominantes: tipo A (AO) o por compresión y por estallido. No hubo diferencias significativas en las mediciones efectuadas en cada grupo pretratamiento y al seguimiento. La única diferencia significativa entre grupos fue en la cifosis vertebral inicial tanto en general como según la clasificación AO entre los tipos A de alta y baja energía. La comparación al seguimiento de los parámetros geométricos entre grupo control y grupos A y B así como entre grupo control y cada tipo (AO/Denis) subdivididos en alta o baja energía, arrojó siempre diferencias significativas. Los parámetros funcionales al seguimiento mostraron siempre puntuaciones promedio buenas, con variaciones significativas entre grupos A y B. El retorno a la actividad previa fue del 90,6%, sin diferencias entre trabajadores de esfuerzo físico y de escritorio. CONCLUSIONES: Es posible lograr un Resultado Clínico Funcional satisfactorio a mediano plazo en las lesiones toracolumbosacras mayores estables seleccionando el tipo de ortesis según que el trauma sea de alta o baja energía cinética. Los resultados clínicos funcionales parecen ser mejores en los casos de Trauma de Alta Energía. Sin embargo, este tratamiento no mejora ni empeora los parámetros radiológicos sagitales.

Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, Internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery

The second, internet-based multicenter study (MCSII) of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) is a representative patient collection of acute traumatic thoracolumbar (T1-L5) injuries. The MCSII results are an update of those obtained with the first multicenter study (MCSI) more than a decade ago. The aim of the study was to assess and bring into focus: the (1) epidemiologic data, (2) surgical and radiological outcome, and (3) 2-year follow-up (FU) results of these injuries. According to the Magerl/AO classification, there were 424 (57.8%) compression fractures (A type), 178 (24.3%) distractions injuries (B type), and 131 (17.9%) rotational injuries (C type). B and C type injuries carried a higher risk for neurological deficits, concomitant injuries, and multiple vertebral fractures. The level of injury was located at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) in 67.0% of the case. 380 (51.8%) patients were operated on by posterior stabilization and instrumentation alone (POSTERIOR), 34 (4.6%) had an anterior procedure (ANTERIOR), and 319 (43.5%) patients were treated with combined posteroanterior surgery (COMBINED). 65% of patients with thoracic (T1-T10) and 57% with lumbar spinal (L3-L5) injuries were treated with a single posterior approach (POSTERIOR). 47% of the patients with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) injuries were either operated from posterior or with a combined posterior-anterior surgery (COMBINED) each. Short angular stable implant systems have replaced conventional non-angular stable instrumentation systems to a large extent. The posttraumatic deformity was restored best with COMBINED surgery. T-spine injuries were accompanied by a higher number and more severe neurologic deficits than TL junction or L-spine injuries. At the same time T-spine injuries showed less potential for neurologic recovery especially in paraplegic (Frankel/AISA A) patients. 5% of all patients required revision surgery for perioperative complications. Follow-up data of 558 (76.1%) patients were available and collected during a 30-month period from 1 January 2004 until 31 May 2006. On average, a posterior implant removal was carried out in a total of 382 COMBINED and POSTERIOR patients 12 months after the initial surgery. On average, the rehabilitation process required 3-4 weeks of inpatient treatment, followed by another 4 months of outpatient therapy and was significantly shorter when compared with MCSI in the mid-1990s. From the time of injury until FU, 80 (60.6%) of 132 patients with initial neurological deficits improved at least one grade on the Frankel/ASIA Scale; 8 (1.3%) patients deteriorated. A higher recovery rate was observed for incomplete neurological injuries (73%) than complete neurological injuries (44%). Different surgical approaches did not have a significant influence on the neurologic recovery until FU. Nevertheless, neurological deficits are the most important factors for the functional outcome and prognosis of TL spinal injuries. POSTERIOR patients had a better functional and subjective outcome at FU than COMBINED patients. However, the posttraumatic radiological deformity was best corrected in COMBINED patients and showed significantly less residual kyphotic deformity (biseg GDW -3.8° COMBINED vs. -6.1° POSTERIOR) at FU (p = 0.005). The sagittal spinal alignment was better maintained when using vertebral body replacement implants (cages) in comparison to iliac strut grafts. Additional anterior plate systems did not have a significant influence on the radiological FU results. In conclusion, comprehensive data of a large patient population with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries has been obtained and analyzed with this prospective internet-based multicenter study. Thus, updated results and the clinical outcome of the current operative treatment strategies in participating German and Austrian trauma centers have been presented. Nevertheless, it was not possible to answer all remaining questions to contradictory findings of the subjective, clinical outcome and corresponding radiological findings between different surgical subgroups. Randomized-controlled long-term investigations seem mandatory and the next step in future clinical research of Spine Study Group of the German Trauma Society.

Burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Burst fractures are rare in the pediatric population. There is limited information available on the best treatment for these injuries. The aims of our study were to evaluate the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) and the potential for neurologic recovery associated with pediatric burst fractures; to compare sagittal alignment between nonoperative and operative treatment; and to determine whether functional outcomes are improved after surgery.

METHODS

All pediatric patients who sustained thoracic or lumbar burst fractures at 2 institutions between 1991 and 2005 were identified. The medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, injury, treatment, and outcomes. Health Survey data were collected from a subset of patients in both the operative and nonoperative groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 17 male patients and 20 female patients, with an average age of 14.6 years (range, 6 to 18 y). Nine patients were treated nonoperatively and 28 patients were treated operatively. The nonoperative group was treated with hyperextension casting or bracing and showed progression of kyphotic deformity from 16.1 degrees at injury to 23.1 degrees at final follow-up. In patients treated operatively, the kyphotic deformity improved from 17.1 degrees at presentation to 7.2 degrees at final follow-up. Twenty-four patients were neurologically intact at presentation, whereas 13 presented with neurologic deficit. Six of 13 patients with SCI had some improvement. The risk of SCI was highest in patients with thoracic-level fractures. The risk of SCI did not correlate with canal compromise. There were no significant differences in functional outcome between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of neurologic injury in pediatric burst fractures of the spine may be more closely related to the level of injury (thoracic) than the degree of spinal canal compromise. Prognosis for recovery of neurologic injury is related to the severity of the initial neurologic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic level 2.

Recurrence of kyphosis and its functional implications after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Treatment of unstable burst fractures in the dorsolumbar spine still remains controversial. Surgical stabilization has been aimed to prevent long-term back pain and progression of deformity.

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to analyze the degree of loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis with pedicle screw instrumentation in place and the components responsible for the recurrence of kyphosis after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar A3 fractures and to assess the return of functional capacity in these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study involves 26 patients who had dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type A3).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiological assessment at injury, immediate postoperative period, and most recent follow-up along with functional assessment using short form 36 (SF-36) and return to work.

METHODS

All the patients had posterior pedicle screw instrumentation without fusion for unstable dorsolumbar burst compression (A3) fractures. The mean follow-up period was 25.5 months. All of them had their fractures stabilized with Universal Spinal System (Synthes, Welwyn Garden City, UK) Fracture System. Serial standing lateral radiographs were taken from the immediate postoperative period to the most recent follow-up. The angle of kyphosis; the heights of the discs above and below the fractured vertebra; and the heights of the vertebral bodies above, at, and below the fractured level were measured. The height at each level was measured in three segments (anterior, middle, and posterior). The values were normalized to avoid discrepancies while comparing radiographs. The difference in the height of each segment measured between the immediate postoperative period and the most recent follow-up was computed.

RESULTS

The mean angle of kyphosis was 6.3+/-8.9 in the immediate postoperative period and 15.7+/-6.7 at the most recent follow-up (p<.001). The mean patient function score from SF-36 was 52.3%, and the mean pain score was 44.9%. There was no relationship to the loss of correction angle of kyphosis to the patient function score (r=0.06, p=.76) and the pain score (r=0.11, p=.58). The correlation between the corresponding difference in the height of each segment and the degree of loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis showed positive correlation to the decrease in the anterior and middle segment heights at the fractured vertebral level.

CONCLUSION

There is a progressive loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis after posterior stabilization with instrumentation even without implant removal that mainly corresponds to the decrease in the anterior segment height of the fractured vertebral body.

Thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: the role for conservative treatment

Burst fractures are common in the thoracolumbar junction and account for 17% of all major spinal fractures. There is a considerable controversy on the efficacy of conservative treatment and the need for surgical intervention. Need for additional stability, prevention of neurological deterioration, attainment of canal clearance, prevention of kyphosis and early relief of pain are the commonly quoted reasons for surgical intervention. However, a careful review of literature does not validate any of the above arguments. The available randomised control trials prove that the results of conservative treatment for burst fractures are equal to that of surgery and also with lesser complications. Surgery for burst fractures may, however, have definite advantages in patients with polytrauma or in the rare event of deteriorating neurology. It is also important for the treating surgeon to clearly distinguish a burst fracture from other inherently unstable injuries like fracture dislocations, chance fractures and flexion rotation injuries which require surgical stabilisation.

Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. a five to seven-year prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The impact of fusion as a supplement to short-segment instrumentation for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures is unclear. We conducted a controlled clinical trial to define the effect of fusion on lumbar spine and patient-related functional outcomes.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2002, seventy-three consecutive patients with a single-level Denis type-B burst fracture involving the thoracolumbar spine and a load-sharing score of <or=6 were managed with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with posterolateral fusion (fusion group, n = 37) or without posterolateral fusion (nonfusion group, n = 36). The patients were followed for at least five years after surgery and were assessed with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with use of the Frankel scale, the motor score of the American Spinal Injury Association, a visual analog scale, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Radiographic outcomes were assessed on the basis of the local kyphosis angle and loss of kyphosis correction.

RESULTS

No significant difference in radiographic or clinical outcomes was noted between the patients managed with the two techniques. Both operative time and blood loss were significantly less in the nonfusion group compared with the fusion group (p < 0.05). Twenty-five of the thirty-seven patients in the fusion group still had some degree of donor-site pain at the time of the latest examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterolateral bone-grafting is not necessary when a Denis type-B thoracolumbar burst fracture associated with a load-sharing score of <or=6 is treated with short-segment pedicle screw fixation.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures

BACKGROUND

Vertebroplasty is a minimally invasive surgical procedure which involves injecting polymethylmethacrylate into the compressed vertebral body. At present the indications include the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures, vertebral myeloma, and metastases. The value of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fracture has been discussed comprehensively. The surgical operation for burst fractures without neurological deficit remains controversial. Some authors have asserted that vertebroplasty is contraindicated in patients with burst fracture. However, we performed the procedure, after considering the patents general condition, to reduce surgical risks and the duration of immobilisation. The purpose of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes, kyphosis correction, wedge angle, and height restoration of thoraco-lumbar osteoporotic burst fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with osteoporotic burst fracture were treated with postural reduction followed by vertebroplasty. We measured the kyphosis, wedge angle, spinal canal compromise and the height of the fractured vertebral body initially, after postural reduction, and after vertebroplasty.

FINDINGS

The average height of the collapsed vertebral bodies was 24.8% of the original height. Average kyphosis angle was 19.4 degrees and average wedge angle was 19.8 degrees at first. Mean canal encroachment was initially 25.1%. Kyphosis angle, wedge angle, and anterior, middle, and posterior height improved significantly after the procedure. The mean amelioration of the spinal canal encroachment after vertebroplasty was 23.3%. The average increase in anterior vertebral body height was 7.5 mm, central was 5.8 mm, and posterior was 0.9 mm. The mean reduction in kyphosis angle was 6.8 degrees and the mean reduction in wedge angle was 9.7 degrees .

CONCLUSION

Although vertebroplasty has been considered as contraindicated in thoraco-lumbar burst fractures, we successfully used the procedure as a safe treatment in patients with osteoporotic burst fracture without neurologic deficit. This method could eliminate the need for and risks of major spinal surgery. We would like to offer it as a relatively safe and effective methods of management in thoraco-lumbar burst fractures.

Conservative management of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine compression and burst fractures: functional and radiographic outcomes in 136 cases treated by closed reduction and casting

INTRODUCTION

Both fractures of the lumbar spine and at the thoracolumbar junction are quite common. The treatment of these fracture types is discussed controversially. Some authors advocate surgical treatment even in fractures without neurologic compromise while other series report good results after non-operative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1997 and April 2004, 324 patients with spinal fractures were admitted to our institution. Hundred and thirty-six patients with compression and burst type fractures treated by closed reduction and casting were available for follow-up. Their medical records, radiographs and computer tomography scans were reviewed and their functional status was assessed.

RESULTS

94 male (69.1%) and 42 female (30.9%) patients with a mean age of 48.6 years (range 17-81) at time of injury were included. The thoracolumbar junction (T11-L1) was affected in 104 patients (76.5%). 23.5% had lumbar fractures. All of the burst type fractures with involvement of the posterior column affection were type A3.3. fractures according to the Magerl classification. Significant correction of radiographic parameters was achieved in the early postreduction period (P < 0.0001). Reduction could not be maintained at the final follow-up but still showed slight improvement compared to the initial presentation. Reduction could be maintained better in the thoracolumbar region than in the lumbar spine. Neurologic function was restored in all patients with unilateral radicular pain but only one patient recovered fully after cauda equina-syndrome. Patients after lumbar spine indicated a higher level of pain when compared to patients with fractures at the thoracolumbar junction.

DISCUSSION

Closed reduction and casting is a safe and effective method for treatment of compression and burst type fractures at the thoracolumbar junction and can restore neurologic function in patients with unilateral radicular pain. It is of limited value in lumbar fractures and in burst type fractures with posterior column involvement.