A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage

The Influence of Zero-Profile Implant Selection on the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

OBJECTIVES

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely used in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Previous studies have demonstrated that the size of implants in ACDF determines radiological and clinical outcomes. However, the principles of choosing an appropriate implant size in ACDF remain controversial. The study aimed to elucidate the influence of the cage size of Zero-profile implant system and offer proposals on the selection of implant size during ACDF.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 109 patients who underwent single-level ACDF from March 2011 to April 2020 with the Zero-profile implant system. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the preoperative mean height of adjacent segments (Hm). Clinical outcomes included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, radiographical analysis encompassed cervical lordosis (CL), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine and the FSU, anterior and posterior FSU height, C1-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 SVA, the center of gravity of the head (CGH)-C7 SVA as well as T1 slope (T1S) measurements. Besides, bone fusion rates, anterior bone loss, subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration were also recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 patients in Group A had an implant size ≥ Hm while 72 patients in Group B had an implant size < Hm. The preoperative general data and radiological parameters were comparable between the groups. At the last follow-up, both groups had satisfactory clinical outcomes. As for radiological outcomes, the anterior and posterior FSU heights were significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (p < 0.05) after ACDF. Besides, both groups corrected and maintained the CL and FSU. However, the average C1-C7 SVA and C2-C7 SVA at the last follow-up were significantly higher in the Group B than in the Group A (C1-C7 SVA: 27.42 ± 9.23 mm vs. 31.76 ± 10.68 mm, p = 0.038; C2-C7 SVA: 14.65 ± 7.27 mm vs. 19.64 ± 8.68, p = 0.003). Additionally, the fusion rates were significantly higher in Group A at the first two follow-up visits.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that an appropriate size of Zero-profile implant system is crucial to achieving favorable clinical and radiological outcomes after performing ACDF. Implants with a larger height but not oversize could maintain the cervical sagittal balance and FSU height and achieve early bone fusion. Therefore, a larger height might be a better choice for achieving a satisfactory long-term prognosis if Zero-profile implants of adjacent size both fit the disc space properly.

Does the Angulation of the Screws in the Zero-P Implant Affect the Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Patients?

OBJECTIVE

When implanting the Zero-P device, the screws of Zero-P form a bone wedge with a 40 ± 5° cranial and caudal angle (CCA). However, no study has been performed in the optimal CCA of the Zero-P implant. To investigate whether the cranial/caudal angles (CCA) of the screws affect the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF with the Zero-P implant.

METHODS

From January 2016 to December 2023, we retrospectively analyzed 186 patients who underwent 1-level ACDF with the Zero-P device. The patients were divided into four groups: group A (cranial angle ≤40°, caudal angle ≤40°); group B (cranial angle ≤40°, caudal angle >40°); group C (cranial angle >40°, caudal angle ≤40°); and group D (cranial angle >40°, caudal angle >40°). The clinical outcomes, including Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, the radiological parameters, including cervical lordosis (CL), cervical lordosis of operated segments (OPCL), intervertebral space height (ISH) and fusion rate (FR), and the complications, were evaluated and compared. Parametric tests, non-parametric tests, and chi-square tests were conducted to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The OPCL of group A was significantly less than that of the other groups at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The ISH of group D was significantly less than that of group A at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The subsidence rate of group A was significantly less than that of group D at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, the upper adjacent-level degeneration (ASD) of group D was significantly less severe than that of groups A and B (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes do not differ among groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A larger CCA of the screws (cranial angle >40°, caudal angle >40°) was better for maintaining OPCL and reducing the incidence of ASD. A smaller CCA of the screws (cranial angle ≤40°, caudal angle ≤40°) was better for maintaining ISH and reducing the rate of subsidence.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Pincer Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Anterior and posterior compression of the cervical spinal cord is usually called pincer cervical spondylotic myelopathy (p-CSM), and surgery is generally recommended; however, there is some controversy about the choice of surgical approach because single anterior or posterior surgery cannot effectively relieve contralateral compression, and combined surgery may cause problems related to trauma and effects on cervical spine function.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and indications of single anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of p-CSM.

METHODS

The data of 21 p-CSM patients who were treated with ACDF at a single center from 2019 to 2022 were collected. Neurologic status was evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association scoring system. The radiologic parameters included the percentage of space occupied by the spinal canal, the cervical sagittal Cobb angle, and the cross-sectional area of the spinal cord before and after the operation. Complications and spinal cord compression rates were also observed. Correlations between the decompressive effects and various prognostic factors were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 24.1 ± 3.55 months. The average Japanese Orthopedic Association score significantly increased, with a mean recovery rate of 65.88 ± 8.97%. The fusion rate was satisfactory. Correlation analysis revealed that the number of operation segments and age were important predictors of decompressive effects. There was no further deterioration of spinal cord function after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF is an effective method for treating pincer spinal cord compression in terms of neurologic recovery, radiologic parameters, fusion rates, and complications, especially for patients younger than 60 years of age with single operative segments.

Diagnosis of spine pseudoarthrosis based on the biomechanical properties of bone

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Failure to fuse following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may result in symptomatic pseudoarthrosis. Traditional diagnosis involves computerized tomography to detect bridging bone and/or flexion-extension radiographs to assess whether segmental motion is above specific thresholds; however, there are currently no well-validated diagnostic tests. We propose a biomechanically rational approach to achieve a reliable diagnostic test for pseudoarthrosis.

PURPOSE

Develop and test a biomechanically based approach to the diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review, development of theory, re-analysis of a previously published study with surgical exploration as the gold-standard, and retrospective analysis of pooled studies to understand time to fusion.

METHODS

Fully automated methods were used to measure disc space strains (change in disc space height divided by initial height). Measurement error combined with the reported failure strain of trabecular bone led to a proposed strain threshold for diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis following ACDF. We reanalyzed previously reported flexion-extension radiographs for asymptomatic volunteers to assess whether flexion-extension radiographs, in the absence of fusion surgery, can be expected to provide sufficient stress on motion segments to allow for reliable strain-based fusion assessment. The sensitivity and specificity of strain- and rotation-based pseudoarthrosis diagnosis were assessed by reanalysis of previously reported post-ACDF flexion-extension radiographs, where intraoperative fusion assessments were also available. Finally, we assessed changes in strain over time using 9,869 flexion-extension radiographs obtained 6 weeks to 84 months post-ACDF surgery from 1,369 patients.

RESULTS

The estimated error in automated measurement of disc space strain from radiographs was approximately 3%, and the reported failure strain of bridging bone was less than 2.5%. On that basis, we propose a 5% strain threshold for pseudoarthrosis diagnosis. Reanalysis of a study in which intraoperative fusion assessments were available revealed 67% sensitivity and 82% specificity for strain-based diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis, which was comparable to rotation-based diagnosis. Analysis of post-ACDF flexion-extension radiographs revealed rapid strain reduction for up to 24 months, followed by a slower decrease for up to 84 months. When rotation is less than 2 degrees, the strain-based diagnosis differed from the rotation-based diagnosis in approximately 14% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose steps for standardizing diagnosis of pseudoarthrosis based on the failure strain of bone, measurement error, and retrospective data. These steps include obtaining high-quality flexion-extension studies, the application of proposed diagnostic thresholds, and the use of image stabilization for conclusive diagnosis, when motion is near thresholds. The necessity for an accurate diagnosis with minimal radiation exposure underscores the need for further optimization and standardization in diagnosing pseudoarthrosis following ACDF surgery.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In a symptomatic postspine fusion patient, it is important to diagnose or rule-out pseudoarthrosis. There are currently no well-validated diagnostic tests for this condition. Incorporating strain-based intervertebral motion analysis into the diagnosis could lead to a standardized and validated test for detecting spine pseudoarthrosis.

The CT Classification of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament to Guide Hybrid Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion vs. Posterior Laminoplasty

OBJECTIVE

For precise and minimally invasive treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine, the lifting segment is minimized, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) was refined and improved. In addition, the development of appropriate surgical procedures for the ossification of each segment was rarely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid anterior controlled antedisplacement fusion (Hybrid ACAF) with laminoplasty for multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Between May 2018 and May 2021, 70 patients with multilevel OPLL were divided into a hybrid ACAF group and a laminoplasty group according to surgical methods. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate (JOARR), (VAS, NDI) score and C2-C7 Cobb angle, the sagittal vertical axis of the neck (SVA), and complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage, C5 paralysis, etc.) were compared between the two groups by t test or non-parametric test.

RESULTS

The operation time of hybrid ACAF was longer. C5 paralysis and axial pain were more common in the laminoplasty group, while dysphagia and hoarseness were more common in the hybrid ACAF group. At the last follow-up, the hybrid ACAF group had better recovery and maintenance of cervical lordosis and sagittal plane balance and a higher JOA score and recovery rate than the laminoplasty group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid ACAF can reduce the number of vertebral bodies and expand the decompression range, which is safe, effective, and tailored to local conditions. Compared with laminoplasty, hybrid ACAF is a precise alternative for patients with OPLL.

Symptomatic Subsidence of a Box-Shaped Titanium Cage After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature

This study reports two cases of rare symptomatic subsidence of titanium cages after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). First, an 82-year-old man underwent ACDF at C5/6 and C6/7 using two 6 mm height box-type titanium cages. On the 34th postoperative day, motor weakness occurred in the right upper limb, and CT showed that the cage at C5/6 had subsided 6 mm into the C6 vertebral body. On postoperative day 55, both cages were removed, and C6 corpectomy was performed. The C5-7 space was refixed with a mesh cage and plate. He was discharged home from the rehabilitation hospital three months later. Second, a 41-year-old man underwent ACDF at C5/6 and C6/7 using two 5 mm height box-type titanium cages. He fell violently on the 33rd postoperative day, causing pain from the neck to the left hand, weakness, and skillful movement disorder in the left hand, and CT showed that the cages at C5/6 and C6/7 had subsided by 7 mm and 6 mm, respectively. On the 65th postoperative day, both cages were removed by reoperation, and C6 and 7 corpectomy was performed. The space between C5 and T1 was refixed with a mesh cage and plate. He was discharged home two months later. Possible causes of titanium cage subsidence include osteoporosis, trauma, vertebral cortex damage by an operative procedure, and cage height of 6 mm or more. While ACDF is safe and effective for cervical spondylosis, special caution is needed in older osteoporotic patients.

Complications With Demineralized Bone Matrix, Hydroxyapatite and Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate in Single and Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the evidence available reporting complications in single or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a demineralized bone matrix (DBM), hydroxyapatite (HA), or beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed in August 2020 to identify studies reporting complications in one or two-level ACDF surgery using DBM, HA, or β-TCP. The study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1857 patients were included, 981 male and 876 female, across 17 articles; 5 prospective, and 12 retrospectives. We noted heterogeneity among the included studies concerning the study design and combination of graft materials utilized in them. However, we noted a higher incidence of adjacent segment disease (17.7%) and pseudoarthrosis (9.3%) in fusion constructs using DBM. Studies using β-TCP reported a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis (28.2%) and implant failures (17.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Degenerative cervical conditions treated with one or two-level ACDF surgery using DBM, HA, or β-TCP with or without cervical plating are associated with complications such as adjacent segment disease, dysphagia, and pseudarthrosis. However, consequent to the study designs and clinical heterogeneity of the studies, it is not possible to correlate these complications accurately with any specific graft material employed. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to correctly know the related morbidity of each graft used for achieving fusion in ACDF.

AO Spine Guideline for the Use of Osteobiologics (AOGO) in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Spinal Degenerative Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Guideline.

OBJECTIVES

To develop an international guideline (AOGO) about the use of osteobiologics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treating degenerative spine conditions.

METHODS

The guideline development process was guided by AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative (KF Degen) and followed the Guideline International Network McMaster Guideline Development Checklist. The process involved 73 participants with expertise in degenerative spine diseases and surgery from 22 countries. Fifteen systematic reviews were conducted addressing respective key topics and evidence was collected. The methodologist compiled the evidence into GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks. Guideline panel members judged the outcomes and other criteria and made the final recommendations through consensus.

RESULTS

Five conditional recommendations were created. A conditional recommendation is about the use of allograft, autograft or a cage with an osteobiologic in primary ACDF surgery. Other conditional recommendations are about the use of osteobiologic for single- or multi-level ACDF, and for hybrid construct surgery. It is suggested that surgeons use other osteobiologics rather than human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in common clinical situations. Surgeons are recommended to choose 1 graft over another or 1 osteobiologic over another primarily based on clinical situation, and the costs and availability of the materials.

CONCLUSION

This AOGO guideline is the first to provide recommendations for the use of osteobiologics in ACDF. Despite the comprehensive searches for evidence, there were few studies completed with small sample sizes and primarily as case series with inherent risks of bias. Therefore, high-quality clinical evidence is demanded to improve the guideline.

Do Osteobiologics Augment Fusion in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery Performed With Mechanical Interbody Devices (Polyether ether ketone, Carbon Fiber, Metal Cages) and is the Fusion Rate Comparable to that With Autograft? A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review describing fusion rates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using autograft vs various interbody devices augmented with different osteobiologic materials.

METHODS

A systematic review limited to the English language was performed in Medline, Embase and Cochrane library using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. Studies that evaluated fusion after ACDF using autografts and osteobiologics combined with PEEK, carbon fibre, or metal cages were searched for. Articles in full text that met the criteria were included in the review. The main outcomes evaluated were the time taken to merge, the definition of the fusion assessment, and the modality of the fusion assessment. The risk of bias of each article was assessed by the MINORS score or ROB 2.0 depending on the randomisation process.

RESULTS

The total number of references reviewed was six hundred and eighty-two. After applying the inclusion criteria, 54 were selected for the retrieval of the full text. Eight studies were selected and included for final analysis in this study. Fusion rates were reported between 83.3% and 100% for autograft groups compared to 46.5% and 100% for various interbody device/osteobiological combinations. The overall quality of the evidence in all radiographic fusion studies was considered insufficient due to a serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical interbody devices augmented with osteobiologics performed similarly to autografts in terms of reliability and efficacy. Their time to fusion and fusion rate were comparable to autografts at the end of the final follow-up.

Feasibility of Non-window Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Pilot Trial

Background

The commercially available design of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed titanium (3D-Ti) cage can be divided into two types according to the presence of a window: a cage with a window that allows filling of bone graft materials and a non-window cage for stand-alone use. This prospective observational case series study aimed to explore the clinical feasibility of using a non-window type 3D-Ti cage in cases of combined window and non-window cage implantation. Furthermore, we evaluated the bone in growth patterns of non-window cages and their correlation with published fusion grading systems.

Methods

A total of 31 consecutive patients who underwent single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery were included. Two 3D-Ti cages with different designs were inserted: a non-window cage on the left side and a window cage on the right side. Radiographic fusion was defined by the segmental angle between flexion and extension radiographs (F-E angle) and cage bridging bone (CBB) scores on computed tomography. The association between the F-E angle and osteointegration scoring system including the surface osteointegration ratio (SOR) score was analyzed.

Results

Radiographic fusion was achieved in 27 of 31 patients (87%) at 12 months postoperatively. Among the non-window cages, 23 of 31 (74.2%) had fair SOR scores, while 19 of 31 (61.3%) window cages had fair intra-cage CBB scores. The higher the SOR score was, the smaller the flexion-extension angle (SOR 0 vs. SOR 1: 6.30° ± 2.43° vs. 1.95° ± 0.99°, p < 0.001; SOR 0 vs. SOR 2: 6.03° ± 2.43° vs. 0.99°± 0.74°, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The clinical feasibility of using a non-window 3D-Ti cage during lumbar interbody fusion might be acceptable. Furthermore, a newly suggested fusion criterion for the use of the non-window cage, the SOR score, showed a significant association with the published fusion grading systems, demonstrating its feasibility in determining interbody fusion in lumbar spinal surgery.

Cervical collar use following anterior cervical hybrid surgery: protocol for a prospective randomized, time-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Cervical hybrid surgery (HS) combines anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) to establish an individualized surgical plan for patients with multiple cervical disc degenerative diseases. In order to maintain the stability of the spine after HS, an external cervical collar is often used. However, there is still controversy regarding the importance of a cervical collar following surgery. This study aims to determine whether the cervical collar is effective and how long it should be worn after surgery.

METHODS

This is a randomized, single-center, prospective, parallel-controlled trial. Eligible participants will be selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome is the neck disability index, which will be evaluated before surgery and at one week, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months following surgery. The secondary outcomes consist of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Scores, MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), visual analog scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Bazaz dysphagia scoring system, Falls Efficacy Scale, cervical collar satisfaction score, neck soft tissue assessment, and Braden Scale, as well as radiologic assessments for cervical lordosis, disc height of the operative levels, fusion rate, range of motion (ROM), and complications including anterior bone loss, prosthesis migration, and heterotopic ossification. The clinical and radiologic examinations were performed by investigators with no therapeutic relationship with the individual patient. All radiographs were examined by one independent radiologist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. Upon completion of this trial, our findings could provide an appropriate cervical collar-wearing guideline for patients receiving HS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR.org.cn ChiCTR2000033002. Registered on 2020-05-17.

Evaluation of Topology Optimization Using 3D Printing for Bioresorbable Fusion Cages: A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model

STUDY DESIGN

Preclinical biomechanical study of topology optimization versus standard ring design for bioresorbable poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) cervical spine fusion cages delivering bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) using a porcine model.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate range of motion (ROM) and bone fusion, as a function of topology optimization and BMP-2 delivery method.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

3D printing technology enables fabrication of topology-optimized cages using bioresorbable materials, offering several advantages including customization, and lower stiffness. Delivery of BMP-2 using topology optimization may enhance the quality of fusion.

METHODS

Twenty-two 6-month-old pigs underwent anterior cervical discectomy fusion at one level using 3D printed PCL cages. Experimental groups (N=6 each) included: Group 1: ring design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, Group 2: topology-optimized rectangular design with surface adsorbed BMP-2, and Group 3: ring design with BMP-2 delivery via collagen sponge. Additional specimens, two of each design, were implanted without BMP-2, as controls. Complete cervical segments were harvested six months postoperatively. Nanocomputed tomography was performed to assess complete bony bridging. Pure moment biomechanical testing was conducted in all three planes, separately. Continuous 3D motions were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Three subjects suffered early surgical complications and were not evaluated. Overall, ROM for experimental specimens, regardless of design or BMP-2 delivery method, was comparable, with no clinically significant differences among groups. Among experimental specimens at the level of the fusion, ROM was <1.0° in flexion and extension, indicative of fusion, based on clinically applied criteria for fusion of <2 to 4°. Despite the measured biomechanical stability, using computed tomography evaluation, complete bony bridging was observed in 40% of the specimens in Group 1, 50% of Group 2, 100% of Group 3, and none of the control specimens.

CONCLUSION

A topology-optimized PCL cage with BMP-2 is capable of resulting in an intervertebral fusion, similar to a conventional ring-based design of the same bioresorbable material.

Dynamic Radiographs Are Unreliable to Assess Arthrodesis Following Cervical Fusion: A Modeled Radiostereometric Analysis of Cervical Motion

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to utilize an idealized cervical spine model to determine whether the parallax effect or changes in the position of the spine relative to the x-ray generator influence intervertebral motion parameters on dynamic cervical spine radiographs.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The utility of flexion-extension radiographs in clinical practice remains in question due to poor reliability of the parameters utilized to measure motion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cervical spine model with tantalum beads inserted into the tip of each spinous process was utilized to measure interspinous process distance (IPD) on plain radiographs. The model was then manipulated to alter the generator angle and generator distance, and the IPD was measured. The impact of individual and combined changes in these parameters on IPD was assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent drivers of variability in IPD measurements.

RESULTS

Isolated changes in the generator distance and generator angle and combined changes in these parameters led to significant changes in the measured IPD at each intervertebral level in neutral, flexion, and extension, which, in many instances, exceeded an absolute change of >1 mm or >2 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that generator distance and generator angle are both independent factors impacting IPD measurements that have an additive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

In an idealized cervical spine model, small clinically feasible changes in spine position relative to the x-ray generator produced substantial variability in IPD measurements, with absolute changes that often exceeded established cutoffs for determining the presence of pathologic motion across a fused segment. This study further reinforces that motion assessment on dynamic radiographs is not a reliable method for determining the presence of an arthrodesis unless these sources of variability can be consistently eliminated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

An update of interbody cages for spine fusion surgeries: from shape design to materials

INTRODUCTION

Discectomy and interbody fusion are widely used in the treatment of intervertebral disc-related diseases. Among them, the interbody cage plays a significant role. However, the complications related to the interbody cage, such as nonunion or pseudoarthrosis, subsidence, loosening, and prolapse of the cage, cannot be ignored. By changing the design and material of the interbody fusion cage, a better fusion effect can be obtained, the incidence of appeal complications can be reduced, and the quality of life of patients after interbody fusion can be improved.

AREAS COVERED

This study reviewed the research progress of cage design and material and discussed the methods of cage design and material to promote intervertebral fusion.

EXPERT OPINION

Current treatment of cervical and lumbar degenerative disease requires interbody fusion to maintain decompression and to promote fusion and reduce the incidence of fusion failure through improvements in implant material, design, internal structure, and function. However, interbody fusion is not an optimal solution for treating vertebral instability.Abbreviations: ACDF, Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; ALIF, anterior lumbar interbody fusion; Axi-aLIF, axial lumbar interbody fusion; BAK fusion cage, Bagby and Kuslich fusion cage; CADR, cervical artificial disc replacement; DBM, decalcified bone matrix; HA, hydroxyapatite; LLIF/XLIF, lateral or extreme lateral interbody fusion; MIS-TLIF, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; OLIF/ATP, oblique lumbar interbody fusion/anterior to psoas; PEEK, Poly-ether-ether-ketone; PLIF, posterior lumbar interbody fusion; ROI-C, Zero-profile Anchored Spacer; ROM, range of motion; SLM, selective melting forming; TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or.

Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

Between January 2016 and November 2018, a total of 68 patients with degenerative cervical spondylosis who underwent single-level ACDF were evaluated in this retrospective study. Thirty-five patients were treated with the zero-profile anchored cage (Zero-P group), and 33 patients were treated with the traditional cage-plate fixation (Cage group). The two groups were compared in reference to clinical outcomes and radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

The mean operation time in the Zero-P group was significantly shorter than that in the Cage group. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia in the Cage group was higher than that in the Zero-P group at 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. No bony spurs were found in the Zero-P group, whereas 5 patients in the Cage group developed bony spurs. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the JOA scores, VAS scores, NDI scores, C2-7 Cobb angles, segmental Cobb angles, total interbody height or fusion rates at 3 months or 12 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, both the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation were demonstrated to be effective and safe strategies. Given the lower incidence of dysphagia and degenerative changes, zero-profile anchored cage is a good option.

Cervical disc arthroplasty combined with two-level ACDF for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A comparative study

To compare the differences among constructs with one-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). A retrospective study was conducted involving patients who underwent one-level CDA and two-level ACDF between June 2012 and July 2020. According to the different locations of CDA and ACDF, we divided the constructs into three types: type Ⅰa: CDA-ACDF-ACDF; type Ⅰb: ACDF-CDA-ACDF; type Ⅰc: ACDF-ACDF-CDA. The differences of clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Fifty-three patients were included with 29 in type Ⅰa group, 11 in type Ⅰb group, and 13 in type Ⅰc group. After surgery, all groups showed significant improvement in apanese Orthopedic Association, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analog Scale scores (p < 0.001). Range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine in type Ⅰc group decreased significantly compared with those in type Ⅰa and type Ⅰb groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences in ROM of the arthroplasty segment and the variations in ROM of the superior adjacent segment were observed among the three groups. The fusion rates of the superior ACDF segments were significantly higher at 6 and 12 months postoperatively than those of the inferior ACDF segments (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes were similar among constructs concerning different locations of CDA and ACDF in three-level hybrid surgery. ROM of the cervical spine in type Ⅰc group decreased significantly compared with that in type Ⅰa and type Ⅰb groups. The fusion rates of superior ACDF segments were higher at early time points after surgery than those of inferior ACDF segments.

The COVID 19 Pandemic-the Final Straw for Irish Rheumatology Services?

Introduction:

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruption to the worldwide provision of acute and chronic care to patients. The effect has been particularly marked in rheumatology in Ireland, where the ability to provide acute and chronic care has been dramatically curtailed due to the combined effects of social distancing, staff redeployment and the repurposing of rheumatology units. Prior to the pandemic, there were significant challenges from an infrastructural and staffing level in Irish rheumatology.

Methods:

Using a questionnaire, the authors evaluated the effect of the first wave of the COVID 19 pandemic on rheumatology services.

Results:

Responses from 87% of Rheumatology specialist services in Ireland indicate that 83% of review appointments were remote, with 87% of new patient assessments in OPD were “in person”. Only 41% of usual outpatient activity could occur within existing infrastructure given guidelines re social distancing which would result a shortfall of 42000 patient appointments. Significant numbers of staff were reassigned from Rheumatology to services elsewhere.

Conclusion:

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on access to struggling Irish Rheumatology services. Implementation of agreed recommendations for augmenting services must occur urgently.

Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering

In recent years, interbody fusion cages have played an important role in interbody fusion surgery for treating diseases like disc protrusion and spondylolisthesis. However, traditional cages cannot achieve satisfactory results due to their unreasonable design, poor material biocompatibility, and induced osteogenesis ability, limiting their application. There are currently 3 ways to improve the fusion effect, as follows. First, the interbody fusion cage is designed to facilitate bone ingrowth through the preliminary design. Second, choose interbody fusion cages made of different materials to meet the variable needs of interbody fusion. Finally, complete post-processing steps, such as coating the designed cage, to achieve a suitable osseointegration microstructure, and add other bioactive materials to achieve the most suitable biological microenvironment of bone tissue and improve the fusion effect. The focus of this review is on the design methods of interbody fusion cages, a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of various materials, the influence of post-processing techniques and additional materials on interbody fusion, and the prospects for the future development of interbody fusion cages.

Classification of three-level hybrid surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective study of 108 patients

INTRODUCTION

According to the different numbers and locations of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), three-level hybrid surgery (HS) has many constructs. The purpose of the present study was to introduce a classification system for three-level HS and compare the two types with each other and with ACDF.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients with three-level cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) who underwent ACDF or HS in our hospital between June 2012 and May 2019. According to the different numbers and locations of ACDFs and CDAs, we classified the three-level HS into two types (type I: one-level CDA and two-level ACDF, and type II: two-level CDA and one-level ACDF). The differences of clinical and radiological outcomes were compared with each other and with three-level ACDF.

RESULTS

A total of 108 patients were analyzed. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) of the ACDF group at 3 months postoperatively was significantly higher than that in the type I and type II groups (p < 0.05). The cervical lordosis was significantly lower in the ACDF group than that in the type I and II groups at 3 days, 6, 12 months postoperatively and the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine decreased significantly in all three groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up (p < 0.05). The ACDF group was observed with the most severe loss of ROM of the total cervical spine, followed by the type I group. The type II group could preserve the most ROM of the total cervical spine. The ROM of adjacent segments increased most in the ACDF group, followed by the type I group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ACDF, three-level HS may yield a faster recovery rate and superior radiological outcomes, such as a superiority in maintaining the cervical curvature and ROM of the total cervical spine and a smaller increase in the ROM of adjacent segments. The advantages were most remarkable in the type II group.

In-vitro Biomechanics of the Cervical Spine: a Systematic Review

In-vitro testing has been conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the biomechanics of the cervical spine. This has allowed a characterization of the stability of the spine as influenced by the intrinsic properties of its tissue constituents and the severity of degeneration or injury. This also enables the pre-clinical estimation of spinal implant functionality and the success of operative procedures. The purpose of this review paper was to compile methodologies and results from various studies addressing spinal kinematics in pre- and post-operative conditions so that they could be compared. The reviewed literature was evaluated to provide suggestions for a better approach for future studies, to reduce the uncertainties and facilitate comparisons among various results. The overview is presented in a way to inform various disciplines, such as experimental testing, design development, and clinical treatment. The biomechanical characteristics of the cervical spine, mainly the segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint load (FJL), have been assessed by testing functional spinal units (FSUs). The relative effects of pathologies including disc degeneration, muscle dysfunction, and ligamentous transection have been studied by imposing on the specimen complex load scenarios imitating physiological conditions. The biomechanical response is strongly influenced by specimen type, test condition, and the different types of implants utilized in the different experimental groups.

Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy (PPEUL) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single‐segment spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods

This is a retrospective research, from January 2017 to December 2019, 30 cases were included in the PPEUL group and 32 cases were included in the ACDF group. The operative duration, blood loss, length of stay, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, MacNab classification and imaging data were collected preoperatively, postoperative 1‐week, final follow‐up and statistically analyzed.

Results

The surgery was completed successfully on all patients, and there were no serious complications, such as nerve or spinal cord injury or infection. In the PPEUL and ACDF groups, the operative duration were 56.63 ± 1.40 and 65.21 ± 2.45 min, the intraoperative blood loss were 51.69 ± 3.23 and 50.51 ± 5.48 mL, and the hospitalization duration was 5.75 ± 1.43 and 6.38 ± 2.16 days. The follow‐up period in the PPEUL and ACDF groups was 24.96 ± 1.12 months and 25.65 ± 1.45 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups, but the hospitalization and operative durations in the PPEUL group were significantly shorter than those in the ACDF group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at postoperative 1 week and final follow‐up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. The JOA scores at postoperative 1 week and final follow‐up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the last follow‐up. The intervertebral disc height of the adjacent segment at the last follow‐up was significantly lower in the ACDF group than in the PPEUL group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the intervertebral disc height of the surgical segment (P > 0.05). The rate of excellent and good results was 90.0% and 87.5%, respectively. Postoperative cervical CT and MRI showed that the spinal canal was fully decompressed and spinal cord compression was relieved.

Conclusion

PPEUL has the advantages of reduced trauma, rapid recovery and remarkable curative efficacy, so it is a new choice for the treatment of CSM.

Clinical validity of the smallest oblique sagittal area of the neural foramen in patients with suspected cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the smallest oblique sagittal area of the neural foramen in detecting cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) and to determine its potential significance for treatment decisions.

METHODS

The subjects of the study were patients with CSR who visited the spine surgery from 2016 to 2019. All patients were compared according to the minimum oblique sagittal area and the cut-off point value, and they were divided into positive and negative parameters. The changes in neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), and visual analog scale (VAS) during the two treatment groups from baseline to at least 24 months of follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

In the surgery group, there was no significant difference in symptom improvement between patients with positive and negative parameters. In the non-surgical group, for patients with positive parameters, NDI decreased by 2.35, JOA increased by 0.88, and neck VAS score improved by 0.42. For patients with negative parameters, NDI decreased by 10.32, JOA increased by 2.86 on average, and neck VAS score improved by 2.46 points on average (both p<0.01 on t test).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with both positive and negative parameters showed significant improvement in their symptoms after surgery, and the smallest oblique sagittal area of the neural foramen seems to be unable to predict the outcome of the surgery. However, in non-surgical patients, symptomatic improvement was more limited in patients with positive parameters than in those with negative parameters. This suggests that patients with positive parameters may be more suitable for surgery and those with negative parameters are more suitable for conservative treatment.

Spinal Implant Osseointegration and the Role of 3D Printing: An Analysis and Review of the Literature

The use of interbody implants for spinal fusion has been steadily increasing to avoid the risks of complications and donor site morbidity when using autologous bone. Understanding the pros and cons of various implant designs can assist the surgeon in choosing the ideal interbody for each individual patient. The goal of these interbody cages is to promote a surface area for bony ingrowth while having the biomechanical properties to support the axial skeleton. Currently, the majority of interbody implants consists of metal or polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages with bone graft incorporated inside. Titanium alloy implants have been commonly used, however, the large difference in modulus of elasticity from bone has inherent issues. PEEK implants have a desirable surface area with the benefit of a modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone. Unfortunately, clinically, these devices have had increased risk of subsidence. More recently, 3D printed implants have come into the market, providing mechanical stability with increased surface design for bony ingrowth. While clinical outcomes studies are limited, early results have demonstrated more reliable and quicker fusion rates using 3D custom interbody devices. In this review, we discuss the biology of osseointegration, the use of surface coated implants, as well as the potential benefits of using 3D printed interbodies.

A 3-year prospective randomized clinical trial of alveolar bone crest response and clinical parameters through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function of implants placed 4 months after alveolar ridge preservation using two different allogeneic bone-grafting materials

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to longitudinally evaluate changes in alveolar bone crest (ABC) levels and differences in resorption rates (RR) between the tested grafting materials following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction after 1, 2, and 3 years (T1-T8) of clinical function.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to two different bone allografts (group 1 maxgraft®, group 2 Puros®) for ARP. Non-restorable teeth were minimal traumatically extracted. Sockets were augmented with the tested materials and covered with a pericardium membrane. After 4 months of healing, 36 implants were placed and sites were clinically and radiographically monitored in the mesial (ABC-M), the distal (ABC-D, T1-T8), the bucco-lingual (ABC-BL), buccal (ABC-B) and oral (ABC-O) aspect (T1-T4).

RESULTS

Changes in (ABC-M), (ABC-D), (ABC-BL), (ABC-B), and (ABC-O) levels showed statistically highly significant differences between T1 and T2 for both bone allografts (p < 0.001). Changes at the ABC-M and ABC-BL levels between T2 and T3 of group 1 showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Both groups achieved and maintained increased ABC levels without statistically significant differences throughout the monitoring periods of 1-3 years (T6-T8) of clinical function. No failures or adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study is within its limitations the first study to directly compare ABC-changes and differences in RR of two different allogeneic grafting materials for a period of 3 years after ARP. It was demonstrated to be, despite significant differences in RR, a successful method of preserving increased ABC levels through 1, 2, and 3 years of clinical function. Trial registration DRKS00013010, registered 07/30/2018, http://apps.who.int/trialsearch.

Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Cervical fusion has been a standard procedure for treating abnormalities associated with the cervical spine. However, the reliability of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become arguable due to its adverse effects on the biomechanics of adjacent segments. One of the drawbacks associated with ACDF is adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), which has served as the base for the development of dynamic stabilization systems (DSS) and total disc replacement (TDR) devices for cervical spine. However, the hybrid surgical technique has also gained popularity recently, but its effect on the biomechanics of cervical spine is not well researched. Thus, the objective of this FE study was to draw a comparison among single-level, bi-level, and hybrid surgery with dynamic cervical implants (DCIs) with traditional fusion. Reductions in the range of motion (ROM) for all the implanted models were observed for all the motions except extension, compared to for the intact model. The maximum increase in the ROM of 42% was observed at segments C5–C6 in the hybrid DCI model. The maximum increase in the adjacent segment’s ROM of 8.7% was observed in the multilevel fusion model. The maximum von Mises stress in the implant was highest for the multilevel DCI model. Our study also showed that the shape of the DCI permitted flexion/extension relatively more compared to lateral bending and axial rotation.

Cervical fusion for treatment of degenerative conditions: development of appropriate use criteria

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

High quality evidence is difficult to generate, leaving substantial knowledge gaps in the treatment of spinal conditions. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) are a means of determining appropriate recommendations when high quality evidence is lacking.

PURPOSE

Define appropriate use criteria (AUC) of cervical fusion for treatment of degenerative conditions of the cervical spine.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Appropriate use criteria for cervical fusion were developed using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology. Following development of clinical guidelines and scenario writing, a one-day workshop was held with a multidisciplinary group of 14 raters, all considered thought leaders in their respective fields, to determine final ratings for cervical fusion appropriateness for various clinical situations.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Final rating for cervical fusion recommendation as either "Appropriate," "Uncertain" or "Rarely Appropriate" based on the median final rating among the raters.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for scenarios included patients aged 18 to 80 with degenerative conditions of the cervical spine. Key modifiers were defined and combined to develop a matrix of clinical scenarios. The median score among the raters was used to determine the final rating for each scenario. The final rating was compared between modifier levels. Spearman's rank correlation between each modifier and the final rating was determined. A multivariable ordinal regression model was fit to determine the adjusted odds of an "Appropriate" final rating while adjusting for radiographic diagnosis, number of levels and symptom type. Three decision trees were developed using decision tree classification models and variable importance for each tree was computed.

RESULTS

Of the 263 scenarios, 47 (17.9 %) were rated as rarely appropriate, 66 (25%) as uncertain and 150 (57%) were rated as appropriate. Symptom type was the modifier most strongly correlated with the final rating (adjusted ρ2 = 0.58, p<.01). A multivariable ordinal regression adjusting for symptom type, diagnosis, and number of levels and showed high discriminative ability (C statistic = 0.90) and the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving a final rating of "Appropriate" was highest for myelopathy (aOR, 7.1) and radiculopathy (aOR, 4.8). Three decision tree models showed that symptom type and radiographic diagnosis had the highest variable importance.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate use criteria for cervical fusion in the setting of cervical degenerative disorders were developed. Symptom type was most strongly correlated with final rating. Myelopathy or radiculopathy were most strongly associated with an "Appropriate" rating, while axial pain without stenosis was most associated with "Rarely Appropriate."

Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct

PURPOSE

To evaluate changes in the sagittal parameters of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex after three-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and identify the influential factors by comparing ACDF with a zero-profile anchored spacer (ACDF-Z) versus a cage-plate construct (ACDF-P).

METHODS

The cohort comprised 106 patients who underwent three-level contiguous ACDF-Z or ACDF-P for cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. Standing, flexion, and extension radiographs of cervical spine were obtained preoperatively, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The assessed cervical sagittal parameters were the platform angle of the axis, Cobb angle, and range of motion (ROM) of C2⁃7, C0⁃1, and C1⁃2.

RESULTS

In both the ACDF-Z and ACDF-P groups, the Cobb angle of the upper cervical spine decreased and the C0-1 ROM increased from preoperatively to 3 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.01). The alignment restoration was lost at 12 months compared with 3 months in the ACDF-Z group, but not in the ACDF-P group (P < 0.01). The ACDF-P group showed more loss of C2-7 ROM and more compensatory changes in C0-2 ROM than the ACDF-Z group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Cobb angle decreased and ROM increased significantly as compensatory changes of the atlantooccipital or atlantoaxial joint after both types of ACDF, which may accelerate degeneration. The zero-profile anchored spacer had less impact on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex but was worse at maintaining the alignment restoration, which were contrary to the cage-plate construct. Surgeons should be aware of the impact of multi-level ACDFs on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex.

Is there a difference in the outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion among female patients with different menopausal statuses?

BACKGROUND

The surgical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in female patients according to menopausal status remain unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in these outcomes among female patients with different menopausal statuses.

METHODS

Ninety-one patients undergoing single-level or consecutive two-level ACDF with a minimum 12-month postoperative follow-up were included in this study. There were 38 patients in the premenopausal group, 28 patients in the early postmenopausal group, and 25 patients in the late postmenopausal group. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by means of the neck disability index (NDI) scores, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Radiological parameters included cervical lordosis (CL), the functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine, ROM of the FSU, anterior and posterior FSU height, implant subsidence, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and Hounsfield unit (HU) values.

RESULTS

All groups showed significant improvements in their JOA, VAS, and NDI scores (P < 0.05). The differences in preoperative and final follow-up CL, ROM of C2-7, FSU angle, and ROM of FSU were not statistically significant among the three groups (P > 0.05). The anterior FSU height loss rate showed a significant difference (P = 0.043), while there was no difference in the posterior FSU height loss rate (P = 0.072). The fusion rates in the early and late postmenopausal groups were consistently lower than those in the premenopausal group during the follow-up period. All patients had satisfactory outcomes at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in clinical or other related outcomes of single-level or consecutive two-level ACDF in the long term among female patients with different menopausal statuses. However, the early bony fusion rates and anterior FSU height loss rates were poorer in late postmenopausal patients than in premenopausal or early postmenopausal patients. Hence, importance should be attached to the protection of late postmenopausal patients in the early postoperative period to guarantee solid bony fusion.

The effects of cages implantation on surgical and adjacent segmental intervertebral foramina

Objection

The overarching goal of our research was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes with different sizes of cages implantation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to evaluate the effects on surgical and adjacent segmental intervertebral foramina.

Methods

The clinical data of 61 patients were analyzed retrospectively. The radiological data included the surgical intervertebral disk space height before (H₀) and after surgery (H), the preoperative mean height of adjacent segments (H_m), the area and height of the surgical and adjacent segment foramen, the surgical segmental Cobb angle (α₁), and C2-7Cobb angle (α₂). The calculation of clinical data was conducted by Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), the recovery rate of JOA scores and visual analog scales (VAS). In accordance with the different ranges of distraction (H/H_m), patients were classified into three groups: group A (H/H_m<1.20, n=13), group B (1.20≤H/H_m≤1.80, n=37), and group C (H/H_m>1.80, n=11).

Results

After the operation and at the final follow-up, our data has demonstrated that the area and height of surgical segmental foramen all increased by comparing those of preoperation in three groups (all P<0.05). However, except for a decrease in group C (all P<0.05), the adjacent segmental foramina showed no significant changes (all P>0.05). The area and height of the surgical segment foramen and the distraction degree were positively correlated (0<R<1, all P<0.05), while the adjacent segments were negatively correlated with it (0<R<1, P=0.002~0.067). JOA scores improved markedly in all groups with similar recovery rates. However, during the final follow-up (P=0.034), it was observed that there were significant differences in visual simulation scores among the three groups.

Conclusion

The oversize cage might give a rise to a negative impact on the adjacent intervertebral foramen in ACDF. The mean value of the adjacent intervertebral disk space height (H_m) could be used as a reference standard. Moreover, the 1.20~1.80 fold of distraction (H/H_m) with optimal cages would achieve a better long-term prognosis.

Vertebral Body Replacement With an Anchored Expandable Titanium Cage in the Cervical Spine: A Clinical and Radiological Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Expandable cervical cages have been used successfully to reconstruct the anterior spinal column.

OBJECTIVE

To perform clinical and radiological evaluation of vertebral body replacement with an anchored expandable titanium cage in the cervical spine after single-level and 2-level corpectomies.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, 40 patients underwent a single-level (N = 32) or 2-level (N = 8) anterior corpectomy and fusion using an anchored expandable vertebral body replacement cage. Clinical and radiological data at admission, postoperatively, and at 3- and 12-mo follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical assessment was performed via standardized neurological evaluation, Odom score, and McCormick classification. Radiological assessment was performed via evaluation of sagittal profile, postoperative position, fusion, and subsidence rates.

RESULTS

Mean last follow-up was 14.8 ± 7 mo. Overall clinical and myelopathy-related improvements were shown directly after operation and at last follow-up. A stable centralized positioning of cages was achieved in 37 patients (93%). A mild ventral (>1.5 mm) malplacement was noted in 3 patients (7%) without clinical consequences. Sagittal alignment and preoperative cervical kyphosis improved significantly (7.8° gain of lordosis) and remained stable. Mean preoperative height of operated segments increased by 10 mm postoperatively and remained stable. Fusion rate in non-neoplastic patients and subsidence rate at last follow-up comprised 87.5% and 17.8%. With exception of 1 patient suffering from severe osteoporosis and cage subsidence, no patient needed additional secondary stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Anterior corpectomy and fusion by an expandable anchored titanium cage with anchor screws without additional instrumentation resulted in overall clinical improvement and radiological anterior column support, achieving significant and reliable restoration of the physiological sagittal cervical profile.

Pseudarthrosis in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a self-locking, stand-alone cage filled with hydroxyapatite: a retrospective study with clinical and radiological outcomes of 98 levels with a minimum 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence of pseudarthrosis after the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in which self-locking, stand-alone intervertebral cages filled with hydroxyapatite were used.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 49 patients who underwent 1- to 3-level ACDF with self-locking, stand-alone intervertebral cages without plates, with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. The following data were extracted from radiological and clinical charts: age, sex, time and type of pre- and postoperative signs and symptoms, pain status (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional status (Neck Disability Index [NDI]), history of smoking, bone quality (bone densitometry), and complications. Pseudarthrosis was diagnosed by a blinded neuroradiologist using CT scans. Clinical improvement was assessed using pre- and postoperative comparison of VAS and NDI scores. The Wilcoxon test for paired tests was used to evaluate statistical significance using a p value of < 0.05.

RESULTS

Three patients (6%) developed symptomatic pseudarthrosis requiring reoperation, with only 1 patient showing clinical worsening due to pseudarthrosis, while the other 2 with pseudarthrosis had associated disc disease at an adjacent level. The rate of symptomatic pseudarthrosis according to the number of operated levels was 0% for 1 level, 8.7% (2/23 patients) for 2 levels, and 7.7% (1/13 patients) for 3 levels. The total pseudarthrosis rate (including both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients) was 16.4%. Considering the clinical outcomes, there was a significant improvement of 75.6% in neck pain and 95.7% in arm pain, as well as a 64.9% improvement in NDI scores. Complications were observed in 18.4% of patients, with adjacent-level degenerative disease being the most prevalent at 14.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF with self-locking, stand-alone cages filled with a hydroxyapatite graft can be used for the surgical treatment of 1- to 3-level CDDD with clinical and radiological outcomes significantly improved after a minimum 2-year follow-up period. Comparative studies are necessary.

The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

The procedure of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is considered as the treatment of choice in degenerative disc disease, which material provides the best clinical and radiological fusion and other outcomes remains heavily debated. Materials that augment the process of fusion consist of bone grafting, titanium, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), or carbon cages. The application of PEEK cages has been recommended as it is radiolucent, and it has a modulus of elasticity that is similar to cortical bone. PEEK cages can be either filled with various materials or unfilled cages. Filled PEEK cages can include bone autografts, bone allografts, demineralized bone matrix, and other materials that facilitate fusion. This narrative review highlights that standalone filled PEEK cages were likely to have better radiological outcomes and satisfactory clinical outcomes for myelopathy when compared with standalone unfilled PEEK cages.

Comparison of Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion With Posterior Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective, Randomized, and Control Study With at Least 1-Year Follow Up

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion (ACAF) with laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal approach for the treatment of OPLL still remains controversial. Both anterior and posterior approaches have their advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and April 2018, a total of 80 patients with multilevel OPLL were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to ACAF group and laminoplasty group. All patients were followed up at least 1 year. Clinical and radiological results were compared between ACAF group and laminoplasty group.

RESULTS

ACAF took a longer operation time. C5 palsy and axial pain occurred more commonly in laminoplasty group, whereas dysphagia and hoarseness appeared easily in ACAF group. At 1-year follow-up, the final Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and recovery rate were significant higher in ACAF group than those in laminoplasty group, when occupying rate (OR) was not less than 60%, or K-line was negative. ACAF was also good at preservation of cervical lordosis and sagittal balance, but range of movement of cervical spine in both groups decreased significantly.

CONCLUSION

Generally speaking, ACAF is a safe and effective alternative for multilevel OPLL. Compared with laminoplasty, ACAF is more effective in the cases when OR is not less than 60%, or K-line is negative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Superiority Claims for Spinal Devices: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Superiority claims for medical devices are commonly derived from noninferiority trials, but interpretation of such claims can be challenging. This study aimed to (a) establish the prevalence of noninferiority and superiority designs among spinal device trials, (b) assess the frequency of post hoc superiority claims from noninferiority studies, and (c) critically evaluate the risk of bias in claims that could translate to misleading conclusions.

METHODS

Study bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The risk of bias for the superiority claim was established based on post hoc hypothesis specification, analysis of the intention-to-treat population, post hoc modification of a priori primary outcomes, and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were identified from 1895 records. Nineteen (46%) were noninferiority trials. Fifteen more (37%) were noninferiority trials with a secondary superiority hypothesis specified a priori. Seven (17%) were superiority trials. Of the 34 noninferiority trials, 14 (41%) made superiority claims. A medium or high risk of bias was related to the superiority claim in 9 of those trials (64%), which was due to the analyzed population, lacking sensitivity analyses, claims not being robust during sensitivity analyses, post hoc hypotheses, or modified endpoints. Only 4 of the 14 (29%) noninferiority studies provided low bias in the superiority claim, compared with 3 of the 5 (60%) superiority trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care decision makers should carefully evaluate the risk of bias in each superiority claim and weigh their conclusions appropriately.

Half of Unplanned Readmissions Following One or Two-Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Are Unrelated to Surgical Site

MINI: In this study we analyze rates of readmission, and the timing and reasons for readmission after one to two level anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Among 18,833 patients who underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion, 3% were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. 39.5% of readmissions were for reasons related to surgical site.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a national database.

OBJECTIVE

In this study we analyze rates of readmission, and the timing and reasons for readmission after one to two level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The safety profile of ACDF has been previously described with readmission rates typically between 2% and 4%. However no studies have investigated the primary diagnoses driving readmission, and whether these diagnoses are related to the surgical site.

METHODS

Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were collected for all patients undergoing one or two-level ACDF for degenerative indications identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The incidence of 30-day complications and readmissions was calculated, and the reasons for readmission as well as the timing of readmission were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with complications or readmissions within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Eighteen thousand eight hundred thirty three patients underwent ACDF (15,464 single-level and 3369 two-level, mean age 53.7 yrs, standard deviation [SD]: 11.6; 50% male). Postoperative complication rate of was 4.3% in two-level fusions and 3.5% in single-level fusion (P = 0.027). Five hundred sixty nine unplanned readmissions were identified (3.0%), of which 39.5% were related to the surgical site and 49.7% were unrelated to the surgical site (10.5% unknown cause of readmission). The most frequent reason for 30-day readmission was pneumonia (9.3%, mean time to readmission of 11.3 d) followed by dysphagia (7.4%, 6.3 d), and acute postoperative pain (7.2%, 11.4 d).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide analysis of 18,833 ACDF cases, 3.0% of patients were readmitted within 30 days, of which at least 49.7% were for reasons unrelated to the surgical site.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Follow-up of a new titaniumcoated polyetheretherketone cage for the cervical spine

Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cages have lower modulus of elasticity when compared with Titanium (TTN) cages. This suggests that PEEK-cages could show a lower rate of subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy-fusion (ACDF) and might lead to a lower loss of correction. We investigated the one to five year-results of standalone PEEK-TTN-porous coated cages in a patient cohort from 2014 to 2017. The patients underwent single-level ACDF for disc herniation and degenerative discopathy. Clinical and radiological outcome were assessed in 50 eligible patients after a mean of 27 months. Results: Solid arthrodesis was found in 84%. Neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck and arm show comparable results to the literature. Conclusions: Clinical and radiological outcomes of ACDF with PEEK-body-cages with a porous coated surface show good bony integration. The modulus of elasticity, design, shape, size, cage surface architecture, as well as bone density, endplate preparation, radical microdiscectomy and distraction during surgery should be considered as important factors influencing the clinical results. One main advantage, over titanium cages, is the absence of MRI artifacts, allowing an excellent postoperative follow-up.

Tantalum Fusion Device in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion For Treatment of Cervical Degeneration Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis study is to evaluate the outcomes of a tantalum fusion device in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degeneration disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A great interest has raised for porous tantalum in cervical fusion, but several studies reported the divergent clinical outcome and fusion rate. No systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted up to present to evaluate the outcomes of the tantalum fusion device.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched multiple databases for studies that investigated the tantalum fusion device in ACDF. The retrieved results were last updated on February 15, 2018. Outcomes of interest comprised of operative parameters, fusion rate, the incidence of adverse events as well as patient-reported outcomes, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Short Form-36 Physical Component Scores and complications.

RESULTS

Ten studies included were included in this review and 6 randomized controlled trial studies included. All studies were pooled to evaluate the outcome of fusion rate, NDI, and VAS after tantalum fusion treatment. The results of the meta-analysis showed that implantation of the tantalum fusion device is associated with significantly shorter operative and fewer adverse events when compared with autologous iliac crest bone graft. However, no difference was found with regards to the fusion rate, NDI, VAS, and global assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this systemic review and meta-analysis, no significant difference was found with regards to fusion rate, postoperative NDI, and VAS between tantalum fusion and iliac crest bone graft in ACDF. More longer-term and randomized studies with large samples are warranted to validate any association found in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Anterior Cervical Debridement and Fusion for Cervical Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Use of Anterior Cervical Plating or Not?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter case series.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical plating in anterior cervical debridement and fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical pyogenic spondylodiscitis (CPS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Due to concerns about bacterial seeding on the foreign material after instrumentations in pyogenic infections, the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical plating for CPS are still undetermined and controversial. Little information is available about the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical plating to manage CPS.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients who underwent ACDF with (n = 12) or without (n = 11) plating for CPS were included. The mean age was 62.6 years. Medical records were reviewed and radiological parameters including segmental height, segmental angle, C2-C7 angle, and fusion status were analyzed. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 21.3 months.

RESULTS

After ACDF with plating, segmental height, segmental angle, and C2-C7 angle were significantly improved compared with preoperative conditions and remained well-maintained at the last follow-up. After ACDF without plating, three radiological parameters were also initially improved compared with preoperative condition, but significantly deteriorated to preoperative levels at the time of the last follow-up. The fusion rate was higher in the ACDF with plating group compared with the ACDF without plating group (90.9% vs. 63.6%; P < 0.01). One patient who received ACDF with plating and four patients who received ACDF without plating underwent revision surgery due to nonunion or bone graft dislodgement. No recurrence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

ACDF with plating showed better surgical outcomes compared with ACDF without plating for CPS. We recommend the use of anterior cervical plating, which can provide biomechanical stability, for better healing of CPS. To our knowledge, this is the largest surgical case series of CPS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Optimization of Three-Level Cervical Hybrid Surgery to Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease: A Finite Element Study

Hybrid surgery (HS) allows surgeons to tailor fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of multiple-level cervical disc degeneration. However, the decision making of selecting either ACDF or ADR for each level in three-level HS remains controversial and has not been fully investigated. This study was aimed to optimize three-level cervical hybrid constructs by systematically investigating their biomechanical properties and their effect on adjacent levels. A finite element model of cervical spine (C2–C7) was developed, and eight C3–C6 surgical models including six HS were constructed. The range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation under 2.0 Nm moments with 30 N follower load were simulated. The von Mises stress, strain energy at the adjacent intervertebral disc (IVD) and force at the adjacent facet were calculated. The ROM of the hybrid constructs and adjacent levels was close to that of the intact spine. HS with arthroplasty performed at C5-6 had better performance in terms of ROM reduction at the inferior adjacent level (C6-7). Moreover, C-D-D and 3ADR had best performance in reducing the von Mises stress and strain energy at C6-7. All HS reduced the facet burden at both C2-3 and C6-7 levels. However, the major drawback of HS revealed here is that the effect of C6-7 protection is at the cost of increased C2-3 IVD burden. In conclusion, we recommend C-D-D and 3ADR for patient with C3–C6 disc degeneration without predisposing C2-3 condition. C-C-D could be a good alternative with a lower medical cost. This analysis guides the decision making in three-level cervical HS before future cadaver studies or human clinical trials.

Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly utilized for a variety of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious indications. While many potential complications overlap with those of the posterior approach, the distinct anatomy of the anterior neck also presents a unique set of hazards. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the etiology, presentation, natural history, and management of these complications. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a PubMed search was conducted to evaluate clinical studies and case reports of patients who suffered a complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. The search specifically included articles concerning adult human subjects, written in the English language, and published from 1989 to 2019. The PubMed search yielded 240 articles meeting our criteria. The overall rates of complications were as follows: dysphagia 5.3%, esophageal perforation 0.2%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.3%, infection 1.2%, adjacent segment disease 8.1%, pseudarthrosis 2.0%, graft or hardware failure 2.1%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.5%, hematoma 1.0%, Horner syndrome 0.4%, C5 palsy 3.0%, vertebral artery injury 0.4%, and new or worsening neurological deficit 0.5%. Morbidity rates in anterior cervical spine surgery are low. Nevertheless, the unique anatomy of the anterior neck presents a wide variety of potential complications involving vascular, aerodigestive, neural, and osseous structures.

Is the bone fusion affected by Modic-2 changes in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

To explore the impact of Modic changes (MCs) on bone fusion after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a zero-profile implant (the Zero-P implant system).From November 2014 to November 2017, a total of 116 patients who underwent single-level ACDF with the Zero-P implant were divided into two groups according to MRI showing type 2 MCs (MC2) or no MCs (i.e., the MC2 group and the NMC group, respectively). A total of 92 (79.3%) patients were classified into the NMC group, and 24 (20.7%) patients were classified into the MC2 group. The clinical outcomes and fusion rates were retrospectively evaluated between the 2 groups preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, and the final follow-up.The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of neck pain were significantly improved compared to the preoperative scores in both the NMC and MC2 groups (P < .05). However, there were no differences in JOA or VAS scores between the 2 groups (P > .05). The fusion rates of the NMC and MC2 groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the final follow-up were 33.7% and 12.5%, 77.2% and 54.2%, 89.1% and 87.5%, and 97.8% and 95.8%, respectively. The fusion rates were significantly lower at 3 and 6 months after surgery in the MC2 group than in the NMC group (P < .05).The presence of MC2 did not affect the clinical outcome but delayed the fusion time following ACDF with the Zero-P implant system.Level of Evidence is Level 3.

Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Intervertebral spacers made of silicon nitride (Si3N4) are currently used in cervical and thoracolumbar fusion. While basic science data demonstrate several advantages of Si3N4 over other biomaterials, large-scale clinical results on its safety and efficacy are lacking. This multicenter retrospective study examined outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using Si3N4 cages. Results were compared to compiled metadata for other ACDF materials.

METHODS

Pre-operative patient demographics, comorbidities, changes in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, complications, adverse events, and secondary surgical interventions were collected from the medical records of 860 patients who underwent Si3N4 ACDF at four surgical centers. For comparison, MEDLINE/PubMed and Google Scholar searches were performed for ACDF using other cage or spacer materials. Nine studies with 13 cohorts and 736 patients met the inclusion criteria for this control group.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean last-follow-up for all patients was 319±325 days (10.6±10.8 months), with the longest follow-up being 6.5 years. In comparison to the metadata, patients from the Si3N4 groups were older (57.9±12.2 vs. 56.8±11.1 y, P=0.06) and had higher BMI values (30.0±6.3 vs. 28.1±6.5, P<0.01), but gender and smoking were not different. The Si3N4 patients reported significant improvements in VAS pain scores at last follow-up (i.e., pre-op of 71.0±22.1 vs. follow-up of 36.4±31.5, P<0.01). Although both preoperative and last-follow-up pain scores were higher for Si3N4 patients than the control, the overall change in scores (ΔVAS) was similar. From pre-op to last-follow up, ΔVAS values were 35.4±34.3 for patients receiving the Si3N4 implants versus 34.4±27.3 for patients from the meta-analysis (P=0.56). The complication and reoperation rate for the Si3N4 and the metadata were also comparable (i.e., 7.39% and 0.31% versus 9.79% and 0%, P=0.17 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF outcomes using Si3N4 implants matched the clinical efficacy of other cage biomaterials.

Feasibility of local bone dust as a graft material in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

OBJECTIVE

Local bone dust has been used previously as a substitute cage filling material for iliac bone grafts during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the impacts of local bone dust on fusion rate and clinical results remain unclear. Extragraft bone bridging (ExGBB) is a reliable CT finding indicating segmental fusion. This study was conducted to compare fusion rates for the use of local bone dust or an iliac auto bone graft during ACDF surgery and to evaluate the effect of implanting bone graft outside the cage.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients who underwent ACDF at a single institution were included. An iliac bone graft was used as the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filling graft material in 43 patients (iliac crest [IC] group). In the IC group, bone graft material was inserted only inside the cage. Local bone dust was used in 50 patients (local bone [LB] group). Bone graft material was inserted both inside and outside the cage in the LB group. Segmental fusion was assessed by 1) interspinous motion (ISM), 2) intragraft bone bridging (InGBB), and 3) ExGBB. Fusion rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The neck and arm pain VAS scores and NDI score improved significantly in both groups. Fusion rates assessed by ISM and InGBB did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the fusion rate in the LB group was significantly higher than that in the IC group when assessed by ExGBB (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Using local bone dust as cage filling material resulted in fusion rates similar to those for an iliac bone graft, while avoiding potential complications and pain caused by iliac bone harvesting. A higher rate of extragraft bone bridge formation was achieved by implanting local bone dust outside the cage.

Complications and Risk Factors Using Structural Allograft Versus Synthetic Cage: Analysis 17 783 Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions Using a National Registry

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of perioperative complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft versus synthetic cage.

METHODS

A large national administrative health care database was queried for ACDF procedures performed between 2007 and 2014 using ICD-9 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 9th revision) and CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes. Cases that utilized structural allograft and synthetic cages were identified via CPT codes. Gender, age, frequency of obesity, cigarette use, diabetes, and number of levels fused were compared between the 2 cohorts using χ² test. Complications within 90 days were identified via ICD-9 codes and compared between the 2 cohorts. Revision rates within 2 years were noted.

RESULTS

A total of 10 648 ACDF cases using synthetic cages and 7135 ACDFs using structural allograft were identified. The demographics between the 2 cohorts were similar. Overall complication rate was 8.71% in the synthetic cage group compared with 7.76% in the structural allograft group (P < .01). Use of synthetic cage was associated with higher rate of respiratory complications, 0.57% compared with 0.31% in the structural allograft cohort (P = .03), while use of structural allograft was associated with a higher rate of dysphagia, 0.64% compared with 0.33% (P < .01). Revision rate at 2 years was 0.50% and 0.56% in the synthetic cage and allograft groups, respectively (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

This data suggests that synthetic cages are associated with a marginally higher overall rate of complications with similar revision rates.

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders in Pseudarthrosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Establish 1-year patient-reported outcomes after spine surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis compared with other indications. In the subgroup of pseudarthrosis patients, describe preexisting metabolic and endocrine-related disorders, and identify any new diagnoses or treatments initiated by an endocrine specialist.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

Despite surgical advances in recent decades, pseudarthrosis remains among the most common complications and indications for revision after fusion spine surgery. A better understanding of the outcomes after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis and risk factors for pseudarthrosis are needed.

METHODS

Using data from our institutional spine registry, we retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective spine surgery between October 2010 and November 2016. Patients were stratified by surgical indication (pseudarthrosis vs. not pseudarthrosis), and 1-year outcomes for satisfaction, disability, quality of life, and pain were compared. In a descriptive subgroup analysis of pseudarthrosis patients, we identified preexisting endocrine-related disorders, frequency of endocrinology referral, and any new diagnoses and treatments initiated through the referral.

RESULTS

Of 2721 patients included, 169 patients underwent surgery for pseudarthrosis. No significant difference was found in 1-year satisfaction between pseudarthrosis and nonpseudarthrosis groups (77.5% vs. 83.6%, respectively). A preexisting endocrine-related disorder was identified in 82% of pseudarthrosis patients. Endocrinology referral resulted in a new diagnosis or treatment modification in 58 of 59 patients referred. The most common diagnoses identified included osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, sex-hormone deficiency, and hypothyroidism. The most common treatments initiated through endocrinology were anabolic agents (teriparatide and abaloparatide), calcium, and vitamin D supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing revision spine surgery for pseudarthrosis had similar 1-year satisfaction rates to other surgical indications. In conjunction with a bone metabolic specialist, our descriptive analysis of endocrine-related disorders among patients with a pseudarthrosis can guide protocols for workup, indications for endocrine referral, and guide prospective studies in this field.

Comparison between porous tantalum metal implants and autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis

Aim: The objective of this study was to systematically compare the safety and efficacy of porous tantalum metal (TM) implants and autograft in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Methods: Potential academic articles were acquired from the Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, Embase, Science Direct and other databases. The time range used was from the inception of the electronic databases to March 2018. Gray studies were identified from the references of included literature reports. STATA version 11.0 (Stata Corporation, TX, USA) was used to analyze the pooled data. Results: Four randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) were identified according to the retrieval process. There were significant differences in operation time (mean difference [MD]: -28.846, 95% confidence interval [CI: -47.087, -10.604], p = 0.002) and satisfaction rate (odds ratio [OR]: 2.196, 95% CI: [1.061-4. 546]; p = 0.034). However, no significant difference was detected in blood loss (MD: -73.606, 95% CI: [-217.720, 70.509], p = 0.317), hospital stay (MD: -0.512, 95% CI [-1.082, 0.058]; p = 0.079), fusion rate (OR: 0.497, 95% CI [0.079, 3.115]; p = 0.455), visual analog scale (MD: -0.310, 95% CI [-0.433, -0.186]; p < 0.001) or complication rate (risk difference [RD]: -0.140, 95% CI: [-0.378, 0.099]; p = 0.251). Conclusion: Porous TM implants are equally as effective and safe as autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion processes. In addition, porous TM implants could reduce operation time and improve clinical satisfaction significantly.