Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

OBJECTIVE

Long-term meta-analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) trials report lower rates of subsequent cervical spine surgical procedures with CDA compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The objective of this study was to compare the rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery in single-level CDA-treated patients to that of a matched cohort of single-level ACDF-treated patients by using records from 2010 to 2021 included in a large national administrative claims database (PearlDiver).

METHODS

This retrospective matched-cohort study used a large national insurance claims database; 525,510 patients who had undergone a single-level ACDF or CDA between 2010 and 2021 were identified. Patients with other same-day spine procedures, as well as those for trauma, infection, or tumor, were excluded, yielding 148,531 patients. ACDF patients were matched 2:1 to CDA patients on the basis of clinical and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of all-cause cervical reoperation after index surgery. Secondary outcomes included readmission, any adverse event within 90 days, and overall reintervention after index surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for covariates and were employed to estimate the effect of the index ACDF or CDA procedure on patient outcomes. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and differences between ACDF- and CDA-treated patients were compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

After the patients were matched, 28,795 ACDF patients to 14,504 CDA patients were included. ACDF patients had higher rates of 90-day adverse events (18.4% vs 14.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82, p < 0.001) and readmission (11.5% vs 9.7%, aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.001). Over a mean 4.3 years of follow-up, 5.0% of ACDF patients and 5.4% of CDA patients underwent reoperation (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19, p = 0.059). The rate of aggregate reintervention was higher in CDA patients than in ACDF patients (11.7% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.10, p = 0.002). The Kaplan-Meier 10-year reoperation-free survival rate was worse for CDA than ACDF (91.0% vs 92.0%, p = 0.05), as was the rate of reintervention-free survival (81.2% vs 82.0%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Single-level CDA was associated with a similar rate of reoperation and higher rate of subsequent injections when compared with a matched cohort that underwent single-level ACDF. CDA was associated with lower rates of 90-day adverse events and readmissions.

Atypical cervical radiculopathy presenting with brachioradial pruritus: illustrative cases

BACKGROUND

Brachioradial pruritus (BRP) is a rare form of chronic dysesthesia characterized by persistent itching, burning, or tingling commonly involving the dorsolateral upper extremities. Although the exact pathophysiology remains unclear, the condition may be a manifestation of atypical cervical radiculopathy.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors describe two patients with BRP, a 44-year-old female and a 51-year-old male, both of whom benefited from surgical intervention for atypical cervical radiculopathy, while also highlighting their presentation, diagnostic testing, treatment, and outcomes.

LESSONS

The cases demonstrate the potential relationship between cervical spondylosis and BRP while examining the role of surgical intervention as a treatment option.

Prodisc-C Vivo人工椎间盘置换术与零切迹Zero-P融合术治疗单节段颈椎病早期疗效比较

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term effectiveness and the impact on cervical segmental range of motion using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion for the treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 56 patients with single-segment cervical spondylosis who met the selection criteria between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into study group (27 cases, using Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement) and control group (29 cases, using Zero-P fusion) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, type of cervical spondylosis, disease duration, involved segments and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization stay, time of returning to work, clinical effectiveness indicators (VAS score, JOA score, NDI, and improvement rate of each score), and imaging indicators (surgical segments range of motion, upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion, overall cervical spine range of motion, and cervical curvature, prosthesis position, bone absorption, heterotopic ossification, etc.) were recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05); the postoperative hospitalization stay and time of returning to work in the study group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-64 months, with an average of 26 months. There was no complication such as limb or organ damage, implant failure, and severe degeneration of adjacent segments requiring reoperation. The VAS score, JOA score, and NDI of the two groups at each time point after operation significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the above scores at each time point after operation between the two groups (P>0.05); there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of each score between the two groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). The surgical segments range of motion in the study group maintained to varying degrees after operation, while it in the control group basically disappeared after operation, showing significant differences between the two groups (P<0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the upper and lower adjacent segments range of motion in the study group when compared with preoperative ones (P>0.05), while the upper adjacent segments range of motion in the control group increased significantly (P<0.05). The overall cervical spine range of motion and cervical curvature of the two groups decreased at 3 months after operation, and increased to varying degrees at last follow-up, but there was no significant difference between groups and within groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, X-ray films and CT examinations showed that no prosthesis loosening, subsidence, or displacement was found in all patients; there were 2 cases (7.4%) of periprosthetic bone resorption and 3 cases (11.1%) of heterotopic ossification which did not affect the surgical segments range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Both the Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement and Zero-P fusion have satisfactory short-term effectiveness in treatment of single-segment cervical spondylosis. Prodisc-C Vivo artificial disc replacement can also maintain the cervical spine range of motion to a certain extent, while reducing the occurrence of excessive motion of adjacent segments after fusion.

The influence of the viscoelastic property of polycarbonate urethane as an artificial disc core material under various physiological motions at the L4-L5 level

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is one of the musculoskeletal disorders due to the Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), that cause low back pain (LBP) and leads to a reduced range of motion. Spinal fusion and arthroplasty are the other surgical procedures that could replace the disc affected by DDD against artificial disc replacement (ADR). This study aims to analyse the biomechanical behaviour of proposed core material as Polycarbonate Urethane (PCU) in the L4-L5 lumbar segment for ADR with Ti-6Al-4V and Co-28Cr-6M as endplate materials and compare it to the performance of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) core. Finite element methods have been approached to measure the overall stress distribution along with other physiological motions like Flexion (FLEX), Extension (EXT), Axial rotation (AR) and Lateral bending (LB), respectively. Preload of 450 N compressive load, 8 N-m for Flex, 6 N-m for EXT, 6 N-m for AR and 4 N-m for LB are applied. It could be concluded that Ti-6Al-4V - PCU and Co-28Cr-6M - PCU is the best composition for the ADR for the L4-L5 level.

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been regarded as a gold standard in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Subsequently, cervical artificial disc replacement (c-ADR) was developed and provides the advantage of motion preservation at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site, which may also reduce stress at adjacent levels. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF with those in patients undergoing c-ADR for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from database inception to November 21, 2021. The authors compared Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores; complication rates; and reoperation rates for these two surgical procedures in CSM patients. The Mantel-Haenszel method and variance-weighted means were used to analyze outcomes after identifying articles that met study inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

More surgical time was consumed in the c-ADR surgery (p = 0.04). Shorter hospital stays were noted in patients who had undergone c-ADR (p = 0.04). Patients who had undergone c-ADR tended to have better NDI scores (p = 0.02) and SF-36 scores (p = 0.001). Comparable outcomes in terms of JOA scores (p = 0.24) and neurological success rate (p = 0.12) were noted after the surgery. There was no significant between-group difference in the overall complication rates (c-ADR: 18% vs ACDF: 25%, p = 0.17). However, patients in the ACDF group had a higher reoperation rate than patients in the c-ADR group (4.6% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

At the midterm follow-up after treatment of CSM, better functional outcomes as reflected by NDI and SF-36 scores were noted in the c-ADR group than those in the ACDF group. c-ADR had the advantage of retaining range of motion at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site without causing more complications. A large sample size with long-term follow-up studies may be required to confirm these findings in the future.

A comparative finite element analysis of artificial intervertebral disc replacement and pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine

Titanium alloy-based Pedicle screw-rod fusion is a very common technique to provide higher fusion regularity than other methods. In recent times, Carbon-fibre-reinforced (CFR)-PEEK rod is used to better reduce the fusion rate. Alternatively, total disc replacement (TDR) is also very common for the non-fusion treatment method for degenerative disc disease (DDD). This study aims to investigate flexibility (ROM), stability, stress condition in implant, implant adjacent bone of the implanted lumbar spine during different physiological movements and loading environments. The finite element (FE) intact model of the lumbar spine (L2-L5) with two-level pedicle screw-rod fusion at L3-L4-L5 and two-level artificial disc replacement was developed. CFR-PEEK was taken for rod for semi-rigid fusion. UHMWPE was taken as core part of the artificial disc. The FE models were simulated under 6, 8 and 10 Nm moments in left right lateral bending, flexion and extension movements. The total ROM was reduced for two-level pedicle screw fixation and increased for the artificial disc replacement model during flexion extension compared to the intact spine. The total ROM was reduced by around 54% and 25% for two-level fixation and increased by 30% and 19.5% for artificial disc replacement spine, under flexion-extension and left-right lateral bending respectively. For screw fixation, the ROM increased by 15% and 18% reduced by 4.5% and 14% for disc replacement at the adjacent segments for flexion-extension and left-right lateral bending.

Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for cervical degenerative disc disease. The results may assist in surgical decision-making and enable more effective and safer implementation of cervical arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients who were treated with CDA between 2006 and 2019 were assessed. Radiological measurements and clinical outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) myelopathy score assessment preoperatively and at ≥2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range, 25-114 months). Radiographic data demonstrated mobility at both the index and adjacent levels, with no signs of hypermobility at an adjacent level. There was a non-significant loss of cervical global motion and range of motion (ROM) of the functional spinal unit at the operated level, as well as the upper and lower adjacent disc levels, compared to preoperative status. The cervical global and segmental angle significantly increased. Postoperative neck VAS, NDI, and JOA scores showed meaningful improvements after one- and two-level CDA. We experienced a 29.60% incidence of heterotrophic ossification and a 3.20% reoperation rate due to cervical instability, implant subsidence, or osteolysis.

CONCLUSION

CDA is an effective surgical technique for optimizing clinical outcomes and radiological results. In particular, the preservation of cervical ROM with an artificial prosthesis at adjacent and index levels and improvement in cervical global alignment could reduce revision rates due to adjacent segment degeneration.

Artificial disc replacement and adjacent-segment pathology: 10-year outcomes of a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Artificial disc replacement (ADR) is designed to preserve motion and thus protect against adjacent-segment pathology (ASP) and act as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery. The question remains, how well do ADR devices perform after 10 years of follow-up compared with fusion surgery in terms of patient satisfaction, sustainability, and protection against ASP?

METHODS

This was the 10-year follow-up study of 153 participants who underwent ADR or fusion surgery after anterior decompression due to cervical degenerative radiculopathy (ISRCTN registration no. 44347115). Scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and visual analog scale for neck and arm pain were obtained from the Swedish Spine Registry and analyzed using ANCOVA. Information about secondary surgical procedures was collected from medical records and presented as Kaplan-Meier curves. MRI and flexion-extension radiography were performed, and ASP was graded according to the Miyazaki classification system.

RESULTS

Ten participants were lost to follow-up, which left 143 participants (80 underwent ADR and 65 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion). There were no differences between groups in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (10-year difference in NDI scores 1.7 points, 95% CI -5.1 to 8.5, p = 0.61). Nineteen (24%) participants in the ADR group compared with 9 (14%) in the fusion group underwent secondary surgical procedures. The higher reoperation rate of the ADR group was mainly due to 11 female participants with device loosening. The rates of reoperation due to ASP were similar between groups, which was confirmed with MRI assessment of ASP that also showed no differences between the groups (p = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first 10-year follow-up study to compare ADR with fusion surgery and to provide MRI information for the assessment of ASP. The authors found no benefit of ADR over fusion surgery after anterior decompression for cervical degenerative radiculopathy.

Cervical disc arthroplasty: What we know in 2020 and a literature review

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a safe and effective option to improve clinical outcomes (e.g., NDI, VAS, and JOA) in degenerative cervical disc disease and compressive myelopathy. CDA's two main purported benefits have been that it maintains physiologic motion and thereby minimizes the biomechanical stresses placed on adjacent segments as compared to an ACDF. CDA might reduce the degeneration of adjacent segments, and the need for adjacent-level surgery. Reoperation rates of CDA have been reported to range from 1.8% to 5.4%, with a minimum 5-year follow-up. As the number of CDA procedures performed continues to increase, the need for revision surgery is also likely to increase. When performed skillfully in appropriate patients, CDA is an effective surgical technique to optimize clinical outcomes and radiological results. This review may assist surgical decision-making and enable a more effective and safer implementation of cervical arthroplasty for cervical degenerative disease.

No Difference in Functional Outcome but Higher Revision Rate Among Smokers Undergoing Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Analysis of a Spine Registry

BACKGROUND

Smoking is a known predictor of negative outcomes in spinal surgery. However, its effect on the functional outcomes and revision rates after ADR is not well-documented. This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a major tertiary center. The objective was to elucidate the impact of smoking on functional outcomes in cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent cervical ADR for myelopathy or radiculopathy from 2004 to 2015 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included in the study. Patient function was assessed using Short Form-36 (SF-36), American Association of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) cervical spine, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Incidence of further surgery on affected and adjacent segments was analyzed as well.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included in the study, consisting of 117 nonsmokers and 20 smokers. There were 60 patients who presented with myelopathy and 77 with radiculopathy. The mean age of smokers was 42.6 years, compared with 46.4 years in the nonsmoker group (P < .01). Statistical improvement was noted in postoperative range of motion, as well as AAOS, SF-36, and JOA scores in both groups, with no difference between groups at 2 years of follow-up. A total of 84.2% of nonsmokers and 87.5% of smokers reported as surgery having met their expectations. A total of 5 of 117 nonsmokers (5.1%) and 4 of 20 smokers (20%) needed revision surgery (P = .018). Three of the 4 smokers who required surgery for adjacent or multisegment disease, whereas only 2 of the nonsmokers needed an operation for adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis indicates that there is no difference in functional outcome or patient satisfaction between smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers have a higher chance of revision surgery after an artificial disc replacement compared with nonsmokers at 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Optimization of Three-Level Cervical Hybrid Surgery to Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease: A Finite Element Study

Hybrid surgery (HS) allows surgeons to tailor fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of multiple-level cervical disc degeneration. However, the decision making of selecting either ACDF or ADR for each level in three-level HS remains controversial and has not been fully investigated. This study was aimed to optimize three-level cervical hybrid constructs by systematically investigating their biomechanical properties and their effect on adjacent levels. A finite element model of cervical spine (C2–C7) was developed, and eight C3–C6 surgical models including six HS were constructed. The range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation under 2.0 Nm moments with 30 N follower load were simulated. The von Mises stress, strain energy at the adjacent intervertebral disc (IVD) and force at the adjacent facet were calculated. The ROM of the hybrid constructs and adjacent levels was close to that of the intact spine. HS with arthroplasty performed at C5-6 had better performance in terms of ROM reduction at the inferior adjacent level (C6-7). Moreover, C-D-D and 3ADR had best performance in reducing the von Mises stress and strain energy at C6-7. All HS reduced the facet burden at both C2-3 and C6-7 levels. However, the major drawback of HS revealed here is that the effect of C6-7 protection is at the cost of increased C2-3 IVD burden. In conclusion, we recommend C-D-D and 3ADR for patient with C3–C6 disc degeneration without predisposing C2-3 condition. C-C-D could be a good alternative with a lower medical cost. This analysis guides the decision making in three-level cervical HS before future cadaver studies or human clinical trials.

Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes

In BriefIn this study the authors compare cervical arthroplasty with fusion surgery in a randomized controlled trial using patient-reported outcome measures and MRI after 5 years of follow-up. Because the main purpose of arthroplasties is to prevent adjacent-segment pathology, it is important to investigate if that is actually realized in practice.

UPPER CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY: THE HIDDEN PATHOLOGY OF THE SPINE

Axial neck pain can frequently be a vexing clinical problem for practitioners. Cervical spine surgery is generally regarded as less successful for axial neck pain than arm complaints. Although only few case series exist in the literature, there is evidence to suggest that upper cervical radiculopathy could be an important, treatable source of axial neck pain. Unlike patients with axial neck pain, patients with radiculopathy usually present with unilateral pain, particularly in the trapezial, parascapular, mid clavicular, or even in the form of suboccipital headaches. Similar to other regions of the cervical spine, initial imaging often consists of plain radiographs of the cervical spine, with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) if further evaluation of the pathology is warranted. Selective injections and electromyography can be used in conjunction with the imaging studies to aid with proper diagnosis. The surgical management of upper cervical radiculopathy is reserved for patients who fail to improve with non-operative modalities. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remain the most commonly performed and most reliable procedure for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. Wide decompression of disc material from uncinate to uncinate is performed with or without a foraminotomy on the symptomatic side to address anterior compressive pathology. Artificial disc replacement (ADR) has been recently introduced in hopes of maintaining motion at the pathologic levels. Young patients (<40 years old) with minimal facet joint arthrosis are best indicated for this surgery. Posterior cervical foraminotomy avoids many approach related complications associated with anterior surgery and is the preferred approach when anterior surgery is contraindicated. Very few studies with small sample sizes (likely due to underdiagnosis) make it difficult to perform a comparative analysis of the different types of procedures. Ultimately, an accurate diagnosis is likely the most important predictor of a positive surgical outcome.

How to choose when implants of adjacent height both fit the disc space properly in single-level cervical artificial disc replacement

In cervical artificial disc replacement (C-ADR), sometimes we encountered with such cases that implants of adjacent height both fit the target disc space properly. No study was available discussing the choice of implant height and the clinical outcomes under such circumstance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of different implant heights on the clinical outcomes and radiographic results when the implants of adjacent height both fit the disc space properly. This retrospective study included 34 patients underwent single-level C-ADR at the C5-C6 level at our institution. In these 34 patients, implant with either 5 mm height or 6 mm height fit the surgical level properly without overstretching the disc space or the facet joint space. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index. Radiographic assessments were conducted on static and dynamic radiographs for the determination of the disc space height, intersegmental range of motion (ROM), and the ROM of the functional spinal unit (FSU) at the surgical level. The baseline information of the patients, such as age, gender, weight, follow-up time, and diagnosis, was similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). Postoperative mean VAS in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 1.0, P < .05). The mean VAS decrease in group B was significantly larger than that in group A (5.3 ± 0.8 vs. 4.6 ± 1.1, P < .05). Significant difference was found in the postoperative disc height of the surgical segment between the 2 groups (6.4 ± 0.4 mm vs. 7.5 ± 0.5 mm, P < .05). No significant differences were noted in the intersegmental ROM and ROM of the FSU between the 2 groups both before the surgery and at the last follow-up (P > .05). No hypermobility or instability was observed in these patients. Our results suggested that when implants of adjacent height both fit the disc space properly, using the larger implant could result in better pain relief without the risk of segmental hypermobility in patients underwent single-level C-ADR at the C5-C6 level.

Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review

Cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) has been increasingly used as an alternative to fusion surgery in patients with pain or neurological symptoms in the cervical spine who do not respond to non-surgical treatment. A systematic literature review has been conducted to evaluate whether CTDR is more efficacious and safer than fusion or non-surgical treatment. Published evidence up to date is summarised qualitatively according to the GRADE methodology. After 2 years of follow-up, studies demonstrated statistically significant non-inferiority of CTDR versus fusion with respect to the composite outcome 'overall success'. Single patient relevant endpoints such as pain, disability or quality of life improved in both groups with no superiority of CTDR. Both technologies showed similar complication rates. No evidence is available for the comparison between CTDR and non-surgical treatment. In the long run improvement of health outcomes seems to be similar in CTDR and fusion, however, the study quality is often severely limited. After both interventions, many patients still face problems. A difficulty per se is the correct diagnosis and indication for surgical interventions in the cervical spine. CTDR is no better than fusion in alleviating symptoms related to disc degeneration in the cervical spine. In the context of limited resources, a net cost comparison may be sensible. So far, CTDR is not recommended for routine use. As many trials are ongoing, re-evaluation at a later date will be required. Future research needs to address the relative effectiveness between CTDR and conservative treatment.

A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc

In degenerative disc disease (DDD), increased loading in the posterior column increases facet joint subchondral bone density and may lead to facet joint degeneration. While spinal fusion is commonly used to treat patients with symptomatic DDD, increased stress at the levels adjacent to fusion may accelerate facet joint and adjacent segment degeneration. Artificial disc replacements have been developed as an alternative to fusion. In this prospective study, the effects of disc replacement with the CHARITE Artificial Disc on facet joint loading and integrity were evaluated. Thirteen patients aged <50 years with symptomatic DDD were recruited. Computed tomography (CT) osteoabsorptiometry was performed prior to the implantation of the CHARITE Artificial Disc and six months after. With this technique, increases or decreases in facet joint loading and integrity are indicated by corresponding changes in subchondral bone density. Changes in the distribution of load alter the distribution of the areas of maximum bone density. Clinical outcome was also assessed at pre-operative and 6 and 12 month post-operative visits using the Visual Analogue Scale back and leg pain scores, the Oswestry Disability Index and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The height of the intervertebral space at the operated level was monitored by lateral X-ray. Subchondral bone density was evaluated in the facet joints of all 13 patients at the operated level, 12 patients at the level above the operated segment, and five patients at the level below the operated segment. Quantitative measurements revealed no significant increases (> or =3%) in subchondral bone density of the facet joints at any level in any patient. Significant decreases (> or =3%) in subchondral bone density were measured at the operated level in 10/13 patients, at the level above the operated segment in 6/12 patients, and at the level below the operated segment in 3/5 patients. There were no changes in the distribution of the areas of maximum bone density in any of the studied facet joints at 6 months compared with pre-operative measurements. Clinical outcome scores were improved at 6 and 12 months compared with baseline. The mean intervertebral space height at the operated level was increased following implantation of the CHARITE Artificial Disc and was 1.8 times greater than the pre-operative height at both 6 and 12 months. In this study, replacement of degenerated intervertebral discs with the CHARITE Artificial Disc was not associated with increased loading of the facet joints at the operated or adjacent levels. Decreases in subchondral bone density may indicate reduced loading in the posterior column following disc replacement compared with loading in the pre-operative degenerated spine. Further study is required to establish the baseline for healthy subchondral bone density and to compare this baseline with long-term measurements in patients undergoing disc replacement.