Modification of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation by image-guided surgery

[Spinal navigation with preoperative computed tomography]

OBJECTIVE

Safe placement of posterior cervical-sacral pedicle screws, S2-Ala-iliac screws, iliac screws, transarticular screws C1/2, translaminar screws C2 or cervical lateral mass screws under the guidance of spinal navigation.

INDICATIONS

All posterior spinal instrumentations with screws: instabilities and deformities of rheumatic, traumatic, neoplastic, infectious, iatrogenic or congenital origin; multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with degenerative instability or kyphosis of the affected spinal segment.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

There are no absolute contraindications for spinal navigation.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Cervical spine: Prone position on a gel mattress, rigid head fixation, e.g., with Mayfield tongs; if appropriate, closed reduction under lateral image intensification; thoracic + lumbar spine: prone position on a cushioned frame; midline posterior surgical approach at the level of the segments to be instrumented; if necessary, open reduction; insertion of the cervical/upper thoracic screws under the guidance of spinal navigation; if necessary, posterior decompression; instrumentation longitudinal rods; if fusion is to be obtained, decortication of the posterior bone elements with a high-speed burr and onlay of cancellous bone or bone substitutes.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

In stable instrumentations, no postoperative immobilization with orthosis is necessary, removal of drains (if used) 2-3 days postoperatively (postop), removal of the sutures 14 days postop, clinical and x‑ray controls 3 and 12 months postop or in case of clinical or neurological deterioration.

RESULTS

Numerous studies showed that the use of spinal navigation significantly reduces implant malplacement rates, complications, and revision surgery. Furthermore, intraoperative radiation exposure to the operation team can be reduced by up to 90%.

Research Progress of Atlantoaxial Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to consolidate the current literature related to atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA) and improve the systematic understanding of this clinical syndrome among spine surgeons.

METHODS

Articles reviewed were searched in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE using search terms: [("C1-C2" OR "C1-2" OR "atlantoaxial" OR "atlanto-axial" OR "C2" OR "C1" OR "atlas" OR "axis") AND ("osteoarthritis")]. All articles of any study design discussing on AAOA were considered for inclusion. Two independent authors read article titles, abstracts and the included appropriate articles. The relevant articles were studied in full text.

RESULTS

A total of 54 literatures were reviewed and consolidated in this narrative review. These articles are roughly divided into the following five subcategories: (1) epidemiology and etiology, (2) clinical presentation, (3) radiographic findings, (4) conservative treatment and (5) surgical indications and treatment options.

CONCLUSION

AAOA was a clinically common but often overlooked syndrome characterized by persistent occipitocervical pain. The most common cause of AAOA was joint degeneration, which was closely related to age and occupation. Initial treatment for AAOA was conservative. Atlantoaxial fusion was an option for patients with severe pain who unresponsive to conservative management.

Biomechanical Effects of Lateral Inclination C1 and C2 Pedicle Screws on Atlantoaxial Fixation

Objective

To assess the biomechanical effect of lateral inclination C₁ and C₂ pedicle screws on the atlantoaxial fixation through vitro human cadaveric study.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2017, fresh‐frozen cadaveric cervical spines with intact ligaments from eight donated cadavers at an average age of 71.5 ± 10.6 years, comprising of six males and two females, were collected. There were no fracture and congenital malformation in all specimens according to the imaging examination. The range of motion (ROM) of the specimens were tested in their intact condition and destabilized condition. Next, the specimens were randomly divided into two groups to ensure no differences in sex and age: Group 1 was medial inclination C₁ pedicle screw and C₂ pedicle screws (C₁MPS‐C₂PS) and Group 2 was lateral inclination C₁ pedicle screw and C₂ pedicle screws (C₁LPS‐C₂PS). The ROM of the fixation scenarios were recorded. Thereafter, all the specimens with fixation constructs were tested for 1,000 cycles of axial rotation and tensile loading to failure was carried out collinearly to the longitudinal axis of all the screws, the data were documented as screw pullout strength (SPS) in newtons. All the recorded data subjected to quantitative analysis.

Results

The ROM of specimens was increased significantly in destabilized condition and significantly reduced in fixation condition compared with intact condition. In C₁LPS‐C₂PS groups, the C₁‐C₂ cervical segment showed 3.96° ±1.21° and 3.75° ± 1.33° in flexion and extension direction, 2.85° ± 0.91° and 2.96° ± 0.71° in right and left lateral bending, 2.20° ± 0.43° and 2.15° ± 0.40° in right and left axial rotation. In C₁MPS‐C₂PS groups, it showed 4.24° ±1.31° and 3.98° ± 1.21° in flexion and extension direction, 2.76° ± 1.10° and 3.23° ± 0.62° in right and left lateral bending, 2.20° ± 0.46° and 2.21° ± 0.42° in right and left axial rotation. There was no statistically significant difference on ROM and screw pullout strengths (764.29 ± 129.00 N vs 714.55 ± 164.63 N) between the two groups. However, there was one specimen in the C₁MPS‐C₂PS group showing rupture the inferior wall of the left screw trajectory owing to the relatively thin posterior arch of the atlas, the screw pullout strength was significantly reduced (left pullout strength value: 430.5 N, right pullout strength value: 748.4 N). Therefore, in the case of the thin posterior arch of the atlas, the C₁LPS‐C₂PS group had strong long‐term biomechanics.

Conclusion

The lateral inclination C₁ pedicle screw can achieve the same biomechanical strength as the traditional atlas pedicle screw. However, for the case where the posterior arch of the atlas is relatively thin, a lateral inclination C₁ pedicle screw is more suitable.

Machine Vision Navigation in Spine Surgery

The advancements in computing and digital localizer technologies has led to the evolving clinical application of image-guided technology for the surgical management of spinal disorders. Image-guided spinal navigation addresses the limitations of fluoroscopy and improves the accurate placement of fixation screws. Several navigation platforms are currently available, each having its own unique advantages and disadvantages. The most recent spinal navigation system developed utilizes machine vision structured light imaging which creates a precise and detailed three-dimensional image of the exposed surface anatomy and co-registers it to a pre-operatively or intra-operatively acquired image. This system improves upon the intraoperative workflow and efficiency of the navigation process. With the continued advancements in machine vision, there is a potential for clinical applications that extend beyond surgical navigation. These applications include reducing the potential for wrong level spine surgery and providing for real-time tracking of spinal deformity correction. As the adoption and clinical experience with navigation continues to expand and evolve, the technology that enables navigation also continues to evolve.

Biologic Agents Preserve the C-2 Pedicle in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Imaging Study Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether biologic agents (BAs) reduce a narrow C-2 pedicle screw trajectory, which is often a key stabilizer in surgical treatment, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with RA treated with and without BAs (BA [+] group [n = 50] and BA [-] group [n = 50]), respectively, were included in the present study. Computed tomography (CT) images of their cervical spine, including C-2, were analyzed. The maximum screw diameter at C-2 that could be inserted without breaching the cortex, measured on 3-dimensional images using a CT-based navigation system, was compared between the groups with and without BA administration. Furthermore, the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint was examined using CT images. The risk factors for a narrow C-2 pedicle were elucidated among the patients treated with BAs.

RESULTS

The pedicle in the BA (+) group had a significantly larger C-2 maximum screw diameter than the BA (-) group (6.00 mm vs. 5.13 mm, P < 0.001), with less destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Among the BA (+) group, a longer period until the initial administration of BAs and RA disease duration were associated with a narrow C-2 pedicle.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that BAs can maintain the trajectory for C-2 pedicle screws, which acts as a key stabilizer in surgical management for the rheumatoid cervical spine, by halting the destruction of the atlantoaxial joint. Early introduction of BAs can be especially important to prevent the narrowing of the C-2 pedicle.

[Rheumatoid instability in the cervical spine : Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies]

BACKGROUND

The involvement of the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to be of clinical importance even in this age of biologics. Pathophysiological changes begin with an isolated atlantoaxial subluxation and may progress to a complex craniocervical and subaxial instability. The onset of cervical myelopathy can occur at any time and leads to a deterioration of the prognosis for the patient.

THERAPY

Treatment of the rheumatoid cervical spine should be aimed at improvement of the symptoms and prevention of further progress of the disease. In the case of instability, this is only possible by surgical treatment. The increasing usage of biological agents has led to a change in the clinical picture of the cervical involvement in RA patients. There are fewer patients presenting with isolated atlantoaxial instability. In contrast, the number of patients with complex craniocervical and/or subaxial instabilities is increasing. Complex cervical instabilities may require a longer fusion from the occiput to the upper thoracic spine. Modern operative techniques make this complex surgery also possible in severely disabled patients with a high comorbidity.

[Relevance of spinal navigation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine]

BACKGROUND

Spinal navigation has made significant advances in the last two decades. After initial experiences with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine, technological improvements have resulted in their increased application in the cervical spine. Instrumentation techniques like cervical pedicle screws, lateral mass screws in C1 and transarticular screws C1/C2 have become standard due to the application of image guidance.

TECHNIQUE

Different navigation techniques can be distinguished based on the type of imaging. In the cervical spine, the preoperative computer tomography (CT) scan that requires intraoperative matching is still the standard of care due to the high image quality. 3D fluoroscopy navigation techniques are currently widely used in the lumbar spine, but the reduced image quality obviates the application in the more sophisticated cervical anatomy or the cervicothoracic region. The future availability of intraoperative CT scans (iCT) combines the advantages of high image quality with those of intraoperative image acquisition. This will lead to a wider use of image guidance in the cervical spine and will enable the surgeon to apply minimally invasive techniques with higher accuracy.

APPLICATION

The successful application of spinal navigation is based on the technical knowledge of navigation systems and its exercise in daily routine. Only the sufficient experience of the clinical staff makes it possible to standardize operational procedures to increase patient safety, reduce radiation dose and shorten operation time.

Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound as a means of preventing vertebral artery injury during Goel and Harms C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis: technical note

Vertebral artery injury (VAI) is a potential catastrophic complication of Goel and Harms C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis. Meticulous study of preoperative spinal CT angiography together with neuronavigation plays a fundamental role in avoiding VAI. Doppler ultrasonography may be an additional intraoperative tool, providing real-time identification of the vertebral artery (VA) and thus helping its preservation.Thirty-three consecutive patients with unstable odontoid fractures underwent Goel and Harms C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis. Surgery was performed with the aid of lateral fluoroscopic control in 16 cases (control group) that was supplemented by Doppler ultrasonography in 17 cases (Doppler group). Two patients in each group had a C1 ponticulus posticus. In the Doppler group, Doppler probing was performed during lateral subperiosteal muscle dissection, stepwise drilling, and tapping. Blood flow velocity in the V3 segment of the VA was recorded before and after posterior arthrodesis. All patients had a 12-month outpatient follow-up, and outcome was assessed using the Smiley-Webster Pain Scale. Neither VAI nor postoperative neurological impairments were observed in the Doppler group. In the control group, VAIs occurred in the 2 patients with C1 ponticulus posticus. In the Doppler group, 1 patient needed intra- and postoperative blood transfusions, and no difference in terms of Doppler signal or VA blood flow velocity was detected before and after C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis. In the control group, 3 patients needed intra- and postoperative blood transfusions.Useful in supporting fluoroscopy-assisted procedures, intraoperative Doppler may play a significant role even during surgeries in which neuronavigation is used, reducing the chance of a mismatch between the view on the neuronavigation screen and the actual course of the VA in the operative field and supplying the additional data of blood flow velocity.

Anatomic Considerations of Anterior Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability

Study Design

Cadaveric, observational study.

Purpose

Atlantoaxial instability (AAI) is characterized by excessive movement at the C1–C2 junction between the atlas and axis. An anterior surgical approach to expose the upper cervical spine for internal fixation and bone grafting has been developed to fix AAI. Currently, no anatomic information exists on the anterior transarticular atlantoaxial screw or screw and plate fixation between C1 and C2 in the Indian population. The objective of this study is to assess the anatomic landmarks of C1–C2 vertebrae: entry point, trajectory, screw length, and safety of the procedure.

Overview of Literature

Methods outlined by Magerl and Harms are the optimal approaches among the dorsal techniques. Contraindications for these techniques include aberrant location of vertebral arteries, fractures of C1–C2 posterior structures. In these cases, anterior transarticular fixation is an alternative. Several available screw insertion trajectories have been reported. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that adequate rigidity of this fixation is comparable with posterior fusion techniques.

Methods

Direct measurements using Vernier calipers and a goniometer were recorded from 30 embalmed human cadavers. The primary parameters measured were the minimum and maximum lateral and posterior angulations of the screw in the sagittal and coronal planes, respectively, and optimum screw length, if it was placed accurately.

Results

The posterior and lateral angles of screw placement in the coronal and sagittal planes ranged from 16° to 30° (mean±standard deviation [SD], 23.93°±3.93°) and 8° to 17° (mean±SD, 13.3°±2.26°), respectively. The optimum screw length was 25–38 mm (mean±SD, 28.76±3.69 mm).

Conclusions

If the screw was inserted without lateral angulation, the spinal canal or cord could be violated. If a longer screw was inserted with greater posterior angulation, the vertebral artery at the posterior or posterolateral aspect of the C1 superior facet could be violated. Thus, 26° and 30° of lateral and posterior angulations, respectively, are the maximum angles permissible to avoid injury of the vertebral artery and violations of the spinal canal or atlanto-occipital joint.

[Spinal navigation for posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation]

OBJECTIVE

Safe placement of posterior cervical or high-thoracic pedicle screws, transarticular screws C1/2, translaminar screws C2 or cervical lateral mass screws under the guidance of spinal navigation.

INDICATIONS

All posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumentation with screws: instabilities and deformities of rheumatoid, traumatic, neoplastic, infectious, iatrogenic or congenital origin; multilevel cervical spinal stenosis with degenerative instability or kyphosis of the affected spinal segment.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

There are no absolute contraindications.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Prone position on a gel mattress, rigid head fixation, e.g., with Mayfield tongs; if appropriate, closed reduction under lateral image intensification; midline posterior surgical approach at the level of the segments to be instrumented; if necessary, open reduction; insertion of the cervical/upper thoracic screws under the guidance of spinal navigation; if necessary, posterior decompression; instrumentation longitudinal rods; if a fusion is to be obtained, decortication of the posterior bone elements with a high-speed burr and onlay of cancellous bone or bone substitutes.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

In stable instrumentation, no postoperative immobilization with cervical collar is necessary. Drain removal on postoperative day 2-3, suture removal on postoperative day 14, clinical and x‑ray control 3 and 12 months after surgery or in case of clinical or neurological deterioration.

RESULTS

Numerous studies showed that the use of spinal navigation reduces implant malplacement rates significantly. Furthermore, it allows a reduction of the radiation dose for the operation team up to 90%.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of image guided posterior C1-C2 fixation for atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA)

Background

Atlantoaxial (C1-C2) osteoarthritis (AAOA) causes severe suboccipital pain exacerbated by lateral rotation. The pain is usually progressive and resistant to conservative therapy. Posterior fusion surgery is performed to stabilise the C1-C2 segment. This is the first Australian study reporting the outcome of posterior atlantoaxial fixation including hybrid fixations performed for AAOA.

Methods

All patients who underwent posterior atlantoaxial fixation surgery for AAOA from 2005 to 2015 at our institutions were enrolled (N=23). Patient demographics and surgical technique were recorded. These techniques included transarticular screw (TAS) fixation using image guidance with iliac crest bone graft and supplemental posterior Sonntag wiring, or C1-C2 lateral mass fixation (Harms technique). Some patients required a combination of fixation due to anatomical variation. Primary outcome measures including patient satisfaction, pain, disability scores and range of motion were recorded for all patients pre- and post-operatively. Post-operative assessment was supplemented with CT and X-ray imaging.

Results

Twenty-three patients (19 women, 4 males, mean age 71.8±6.3 years) underwent surgical fixation. Eight underwent TAS fixation, 8 had Harms fixation, and 7 had a hybrid fixation. All patients reported statistically significant improvement in pain scores [Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 9.4 pre-op compared to 2.9 post-op, P<0.005]. Disability scores [Neck Disability Index (NDI)] were statistically significantly reduced from 72.2±12.9 pre-operatively to 18.9±11.9 post-operatively, P<0.005. Mean follow-up was 55.3±36.1 months. Results did not vary according to the construct type. Ninety-five point five percent of patients showed radiographic evidence of fusion. Ninety-one percent of patients said they would undergo the surgery again.

Conclusions

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation with TAS and Harms constructs are highly effective for the surgical treatment of intractable neck pain secondary to atlantoaxial lateral mass osteoarthritis (AAOA). Surgery offers a high rate of symptom relief. If anatomical variability exists, both transarticular and pedicle screw fixation could be safely used in the same patient.

Potential intraoperative factors of screw-related complications following posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of several factors, including patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of screws and their parameters, on the frequency of intraoperative screw-associated complications in posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database between January 1986 and March 2018 was performed. The key inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and post-operative screw-associated complications.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 1041 abstracts, and a total of 54 abstracts were included in the present study. The overall number of operated patients was 2306. In this group, 4439 screws were inserted. The rate of screw-associated complications during the different time periods was estimated upon meta-analysis. Statistical analysis of the screw malposition rate, vertebral artery injury rate, screw breakage rate based on patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of implants and their parameters was also performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors that help reduce the rate of screw-associated complications include the intraoperative application of biplanar fluoroscopy or neuronavigation system, the use of 4 mm or thicker lag screws, and screw insertion through contraincisions using cannulated ported instruments. On the other hand, the potential risk factors of screw-associated complications include inadequate intraoperative head fixation using skeletal traction, uniplanar fluoroscopy-guided screw insertion, screw insertion using the posterior midline approach, and the use of 3.5 mm or thinner full-threaded screws. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at the C1-C2 Lateral Articulation without Posterior Structural Bone Graft in Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion in Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion is an important armamentarium for neurosurgeons to treat several pathologies involving the craniovertebral junction. Although the potential advantages of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) are well documented in the lumbar spine, its indication for C1-C2 fusion has not been well characterized. In our institution, we apply rhBMP-2 to the C1-C2 joint either alone or with hydroxyapatite, locally harvested autograft chips, and/or morselized allogenic bone graft for selected cases-without conventional posterior structural bone graft. We report the clinical outcomes of the surgical technique to elucidate its feasibility.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective review of data from 2008 to 2016 and identified 69 patients who had undergone posterior atlantoaxial fusion with rhBMP-2. The clinical records of these patients were reviewed, and the baseline characteristics, operative data, and postoperative complications were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The average age of the 69 patients was 60.8 ± 4.5 years, and 55.1% were women. With an average follow-up period of 21.1 ± 4.2 months, the C1-C2 fusion rate was 94.3% (65 of 69), and the average time to fusion was 11.4 ± 2.6 months (range, 5-23). The overall reoperation rate was 10.1% (7 of 69), with instrumentation failure in 7 patients (10.1%), adjacent segment disease in 2 (2.9%), and postoperative dysphagia and dyspnea in 2 patients (2.9%). No ectopic bone formation or soft tissue edema developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although retrospective and from a single center, our study has shown that rhBMP-2 usage at the C1-C2 joint without posterior structural bone grafting is a safe and reasonable surgical option.

Neurological outcomes following iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic vascular injury is a feared complication of posterior atlanto-axial instrumentation. A better understanding of clinical outcome and management options following this injury will allow surgeons to better care for these patients. The object of the study was to systematically review the neurologic outcomes after iatrogenic vascular injury during atlanto-axial posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the Medline database following PRISMA guidelines. In our analysis, we included any retrospective cohort studies, prospective cohort studies, case reports, cases series, or systematic reviews with patients who had undergone posterior atlanto-axial fusion via screw rod constructs (SRC) or transarticular screws (TAS) that reported a patient with an injury to an arterial vessel directly attributable to the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty cases of vascular injury were reported in 2078 (2.9%) patients over 27 publications. The average age for this patient population was 55.7+/-17.9. Vascular injury following posterior C1/2 instrumentation resulted in ipsilateral stroke in 10.0% (n=6/60) and non-persistent neurologic deficit in 6.7% (n=4/60) of cases with the deficit being permanent (not including death) in 1.7% (n=1/60) of cases. Four patients (6.7%) died. Arteriovenous fistula or pseudoaneurysm occurred in 8.3% (n=5/60) and 3.3% (n=2/60) of cases, respectively. Eight patients (13.3%) underwent endovascular repair of the injury with no permanent deficit.

CONCLUSION

Neurological morbidity after iatrogenic vascular injury during posterior C1/2 fixation is higher than previously reported in literature. Some patients may benefit from endovascular treatment. Surgeons should be aware of normal and anomalous vertebral artery anatomy to avoid this potentially catastrophic complication.

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion for patients with a high-riding vertebral artery

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

To describe the technique and clinical results of percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 arthrodesis in patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

DESIGN SETTING

Zhejiang Spine Center, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Five patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and an upper cervical fracture.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with limited exposure posterior C1/2 wire fusion.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Computed tomography scans were used to assess the high-riding vertebral artery and feasibility of anterior transarticular screw fixation preoperatively. A Philadelphia collar was used to immobilize the neck postoperatively. Anteroposterior (open-mouth) and lateral views were obtained at pre/postoperation and at the follow-up.

RESULTS

The operation was performed successfully on all of the patients, and no intraoperative operation-related complications such as nerve injury, vertebral artery, and soft tissue complications occurred. The mean follow-up period was 33.8 months (range: 24 to 58 months). No screw breakage, loosening, pullout, or cutout was observed. Bone union was achieved in all patients at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our small case series results suggested that percutaneous anterior transarticular screw fixation combined with mini-open posterior C1/2 wire fusion is a technically minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and useful method to treat patients with a high-riding vertebral artery.

Endoscopic endonasal atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique: an anatomical feasibility and biomechanical study

OBJECT The primary disadvantage of the posterior cervical approach for atlantoaxial stabilization after odontoidectomy is that it is conducted as a second-stage procedure. The goal of the current study is to assess the surgical feasibility and biomechanical performance of an endoscopic endonasal surgical technique for C1-2 fixation that may eliminate the need for posterior fixation after odontoidectomy. METHODS The first step of the study was to perform endoscopic endonasal anatomical dissections of the craniovertebral junction in 10 silicone-injected fixed cadaveric heads to identify relevant anatomical landmarks. The second step was to perform a quantitative analysis using customized software in 10 reconstructed adult cervical spine CT scans to identify the optimal screw entry point and trajectory. The third step was biomechanical flexibility testing of the construct and comparison with the posterior C1-2 transarticular fixation in 14 human cadaveric specimens. RESULTS Adequate surgical exposure and identification of the key anatomical landmarks, such as C1-2 lateral masses, the C-1 anterior arch, and the odontoid process, were provided by the endonasal endoscopic approach in all specimens. Radiological analysis of anatomical detail suggested that the optimal screw entry point was on the anterior aspect of the C-1 lateral mass near the midpoint, and the screw trajectory was inferiorly and slightly laterally directed. The custommade angled instrumentation was crucial for screw placement. Biomechanical analysis suggested that anterior C1-2 fixation compared favorably to posterior fixation by limiting flexion-extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending (p > 0.3). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of an endoscopic endonasal technique for C1-2 fusion. This novel technique may have clinical utility by eliminating the need for a second-stage posterior fixation operation in certain patients undergoing odontoidectomy.

Navigated pedicle screw placement using computed tomographic data in dorsolumbar fractures

BACKGROUND

Computed tomographic (CT) based navigation is a technique to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. It is believed to enhance accuracy of pedicle screw placement, potentially avoiding complications arising due to pedicle wall breach. This study aims to assess the results of dorsolumbar fractures operated by this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive skeletally mature patients of fractures of dorsolumbar spine (T9-L5) were subjected to an optoelectronic navigation system. All patients were thoroughly examined for neurological deficit. The criterion for instability were either a tricolumnar injury or presence of neurological deficit or both. Patients with multilevel fractures and distorted spine were excluded from study. Time taken for insertion of each pedicle screw was recorded and placement assessed with a postoperative CT scan using Laine's grading system.

RESULTS

Only one screw out of a total of 118 screws was misplaced with a Laine's Grade 5 placement, showing a misplacement rate of 0.847%. Average time for matching was 7.8 min (range 5-12 min). Average time taken for insertion of a single screw was 4.19 min (range 2-8 min) and total time for all screws after exposure was 34.23 min (range 24-45 min) for a four screw construct. No neurovascular complications were seen in any of the patients postoperatively and in subsequent followup of 1-year duration.

CONCLUSION

CT-based navigation is effective in improving accuracy of pedicle screw placement in traumatic injuries of dorsolumbar spine (T9-L5), however additional cost of procuring CT scan to the patient and cost of equipment is of significant concern in developing countries. Reduced radiation exposure and lowered ergonomic constraints around the operation table are its additional benefits.

The development and evaluation of individualized templates to assist transoral C2 articular mass or transpedicular screw placement in TARP-IV procedures: adult cadaver specimen study

OBJECTIVES

The transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate system treats irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation from transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate-I to transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate-III. However, this system has demonstrated problems associated with screw loosening, atlantoaxial fixation and concealed or manifest neurovascular injuries. This study sought to design a set of individualized templates to improve the accuracy of anterior C2 screw placement in the transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate-IV procedure.

METHODS

A set of individualized templates was designed according to thin-slice computed tomography data obtained from 10 human cadavers. The templates contained cubic modules and drill guides to facilitate transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate positioning and anterior C2 screw placement. We performed 2 stages of cadaveric experiments with 2 cadavers in stage one and 8 in stage two. Finally, guided C2 screw placement was evaluated by reading postoperative computed tomography images and comparing the planned and inserted screw trajectories.

RESULTS

There were two cortical breaching screws in stage one and three in stage two, but only the cortical breaching screws in stage one were ranked critical. In stage two, the planned entry points and the transverse angles of the anterior C2 screws could be simulated, whereas the declination angles could not be simulated due to intraoperative blockage of the drill bit and screwdriver by the upper teeth.

CONCLUSIONS

It was feasible to use individualized templates to guide transoral C2 screw placement. Thus, these drill templates combined with transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate-IV, may improve the accuracy of transoral C2 screw placement and reduce related neurovascular complications.

Computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery

Computer-assisted navigation has a role in some orthopedic procedures. It allows the surgeons to obtain real-time feedback and offers the potential to decrease intra-operative errors and optimize the surgical result. Computer-assisted navigation systems can be active or passive. Active navigation systems can either perform surgical tasks or prohibit the surgeon from moving past a predefined zone. Passive navigation systems provide intraoperative information, which is displayed on a monitor, but the surgeon is free to make any decisions he or she deems necessary. This article reviews the available types of computer-assisted navigation, summarizes the clinical applications and reviews the results of related series using navigation, and informs surgeons of the disadvantages and pitfalls of computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

Minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and microendoscopic bone graft for atlantoaxial instability

PURPOSE

Even though transarticular screw (TAS) fixation has been commonly used for posterior C1-C2 arthrodesis in both traumatic and non-traumatic lesions, anterior TAS fixation C1-2 is a less invasive technique as compared with posterior TAS which produces significant soft tissue injury, and there were few reports on percutaneous anterior TAS fixation and microendoscopic bone graft for atlantoaxial instability. The goals of our study were to describe and evaluate a new technique for anterior TAS fixation of the atlantoaxial joints for traumatic atlantoaxial instability by analyzing radiographic and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of seven consecutive patients with C1-C2 instability due to upper cervical injury treated by a minimally invasive procedure from May 2007 to August 2009. Bilateral anterior TAS were inserted by the percutaneous approach under Iso-C3D fluoroscopic control. The atlantoaxial joint space was prepared for morselized autogenous bone graft under microendoscopy. The data for analysis included time after the injuries, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, X-ray exposure time, clinical results, and complications. Radiographic evaluation included the assessment of atlantoaxial fusion rate and placement of TAS. Bone fusion of the atlantoaxial joints was assessed by flexion extension lateral radiographs and 1-mm thin-slice computed tomography images as radiographic results. Clinical assessment was done by analyzing the recovery state of clinical presentation from the preoperative period to the last follow-up and by evaluating complications.

RESULTS

A total of 14 screws were placed correctly. The atlantoaxial solid fusion without screw failure was confirmed by CT scan in seven cases after a mean follow-up of 27.5 months (range 18-45 months). All patients with associated clinical presentation made a recovery without neurologic sequelae. Postoperative dysphagia occurred and disappeared in two cases within 5 days after surgery. There were no other complications during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous anterior TAS fixation and microendoscopic bone graft could be an option for achieving C1-C2 stabilization with several potential advantages such as less tissue trauma and better accuracy. Bilateral TAS fixation and morselized autograft affords effective fixation and solid fusion by a minimally invasive approach.

Development of a new technique for pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a new technique for cervical pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide.

OBJECTIVE

In posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery, instrumentation with screws is virtually routine. However, malpositioning of screws is not rare. To avoid complications during cervical pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion, the authors developed a new technique which is a mold shaped to fit the lamina.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical pedicle screw fixation and Magerl screw fixation provide good correction of cervical alignment, rigid fixation, and a high fusion rate. However, malpositioning of screws is not a rare occurrence, and thus the insertion of screws has a potential risk of neurovascular injury. It is necessary to determine a safe insertion procedure for these screws.

METHODS

Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans of 1-mm slice thickness were obtained of the whole surgical area. The CT data were imported into a computer navigation system. We developed a 3-dimensional full-scale model of the patient's spine using a rapid prototyping technique from the CT data. Molds of the left and right sides at each vertebra were also constructed. One hole (2.0 mm in diameter and 2.0 cm in length) was made in each mold for the insertion of a screw guide. We performed a simulated surgery using the bone model and the mold before operation in all patients. The mold was firmly attached to the surface of the lamina and the guide wire was inserted using the intraoperative image of lateral vertebra. The proper insertion point, direction, and length of the guide were also confirmed both with the model bone and the image intensifier in the operative field. Then, drilling using a cannulated drill and tapping using a cannulated tapping device were carried out. Eleven consecutive patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery using this technique since 2009 are included. The screw positions in the sagittal and axial planes were evaluated by postoperative CT scan to check for malpositioning.

RESULTS

The screw insertion was done in the same manner as the simulated surgery. With the aid of this guide the pedicle screws and Magerl screws could be easily inserted even at the level where the pedicle seemed to be very thin and sclerotic on the CT scan. Postoperative CT scan showed that there were no critical breaches of the screws.

CONCLUSION

This method employing the device using a 3-dimensional image guide seems to be easy and safe to use. The technique may improve the safety of pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion even in difficult cases with narrow sclerotic pedicles.

Outcomes of fusion for lateral atlantoaxial osteoarthritis: meta-analysis and review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Atlantoaxial osteoarthritis (AAOA) is an underrecognized source of neck pain, limitation of range of motion, and cervicogenic headaches. When conservative treatments such as facet injections fail, fusion may be indicated. We reviewed published series describing posterior fusions for atlantoaxial osteoarthritis of the facet joints.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for English-language articles describing the diagnosis and treatment of AAOA. Twenty-three studies reporting on 246 patients treated with posterior fusion for lateral AAOA fulfilled inclusion criteria. Standard statistical and formal meta-analytic techniques were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

All studies provided class III evidence. The 30-day perioperative mortality was 1.2% and neurologic injury did not occur. Patients were followed for a mean of nearly 5 years. Fusion was successful in 98% of patients with a single operation and with 99.5% of patients after revision surgery. Intractable preoperative neck pain either resolved completely or improved in 97.7% of patients. Using meta-analytic techniques, the point estimate for improvement or resolution of pain was 92.6% (confidence interval = 86.8%-96.0%) and the rate of arthrodesis for AAOA was 92.2% (confidence interval = 85.6%-95.9%) and there were no differences among the various techniques used for fusion. Operative complications were few.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior C1-2 fusion is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with intractable neck pain secondary to lateral AAOA. Modern fusion options offer a high rate of arthrodesis and low risk of morbidity if conservative therapies fail to provide adequate pain relief.

Computer-assisted C1-C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation "Magerl Technique" for Atlantoaxial Instability

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the surgical results of computer-assisted C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability and the usefulness of the navigation system.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

We used a computed tomography (CT)-based computer navigation system in planning and screw insertion in Magerl's procedure, which provides the most rigid atlantoaxial fusion, to avoid risk of vertebral artery (VA) tear by avoiding high-riding VA during screw insertion.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion under the CT-based navigation system were studied. The mean observation period was 33.5 months. The evaluated items included the existence of VA stenosis by preoperative magnetic resonance angiography, surgical time, blood loss volume, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Ranawat's pain criteria before surgery and at final follow-up, postoperative screw position evaluated by CT, and bony fusion.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 205 minutes, with the mean blood loss volume of 242 ml. The mean JOA score was 11.6 points before surgery and 13.7 at final follow-up. Occipital and/or cervical pain presented before operation was remitted or resolved in all patients. Evaluation of screw insertion by CT revealed correct penetration to atlantoaxial joints, with a perforation rate of 2.6%. There was no complication, including VA tear, and all patients who were followed-up during one year or more after surgery achieved bony fusion. Some subjects who appeared inappropriate for surgery from CT images were assessed as eligible for surgery based on the evaluation results obtained using the navigation system.

CONCLUSIONS

It was demonstrated that the CT-based navigation system is an effective support device for Magerl's procedure.

Atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws: meta-analysis and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To review published series describing C1-2 posterior instrumented fusions and summarize clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with transarticular screw (TAS) fixation.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1986 and April 2011 describing posterior atlantoaxial instrumentation with C1-2 TAS fixation. There were 45 studies including 2073 patients treated with TAS that fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis techniques were used to calculate outcomes.

RESULTS

All studies provided class III evidence. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 0.8%, and the incidence of neurologic injury was 0.2%. The incidence of clinically significant malpositioned screws was 7.1% (confidence interval [CI], 5.7%-8.8%), the incidence of vertebral artery injury was 3.1% (CI, 2.3%-4.3%), and the rate of fusion with the TAS technique was 94.6% (CI, 92.6%-96.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

TAS fixation is a safe and effective treatment option for C1-2 instability with high rates of fusion (approximately 95%). Screw malposition and vertebral artery injury occurred in approximately 5% of patients. The successful insertion of TAS requires a thorough knowledge of atlantoaxial anatomy.

Harms C1-C2 instrumentation technique: anatomo-surgical guide

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study.

OBJECTIVE

To measure C1 and C2 critical areas related to the screws trajectory, according to Harms technique, in Latin specimens. To investigate vertebral's artery course in cadavers.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To our knowledge there are no studies addressing vertebral surface measurements for screw placement, according to Harms C1-C2 instrumentation technique, nor cadaveric measurements of the trajectory of the vertebral artery in Latin specimens.

METHODS

C1 and C2 specimens were measured. C1 measurements: height, width, anteroposterior diameter (intraosseus screw length) and convergence in the axial plane of the lateral mass; length from the posterior border of the posterior C1 arch to the anterior cortex of the articular mass (total screw length). C2 measurements: width, height, convergence and sagittal inclination of the pars interarticularis. Direction of the trajectory of the vertebral artery in the suboccipital region in fresh cadavers.

RESULTS

C1: left mass width 14.20 mm, right: 14.32 mm; left intraosseus screw length: 17.17 mm, right 16.9 mm; left total length of the screw: 27.14 mm, right: 26.72 mm; left mass height: 10.22 mm, right: 10.29 mm. Right mass convergence: 24.68°, left: 22.44°. C2: width: left 8.75 mm, right: 8.53 mm; height: left 10 mm, right 9.81 mm; convergence: left 42.15°, right: 38.98°; sagittal inclination: left 35.50°, right 33.07°. Vertebral artery's medial border is between 13 and 22 mm from the middle line of C1 posterior arch.

CONCLUSION

Convergence and inclination of the pars are slightly greater than the suggested by Harms. Individual and/or racial variations must be considered. There is enough space for safe placement of a 3.5 mm screw in the lateral masses of C1 and through the pars of C2. Dissecting the superior face of the posterior arch of C1 laterally more than 10 mm from the posterior tubercule could injure the vertebral artery.

Accuracy of Image-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation With Automated Referencing, Part I: Cervicothoracic Spine

BACKGROUND:

Image-guided spinal instrumentation reduces the incidence of implant misplacement.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based neuronavigation (iCT-N).

METHODS:

In 35 patients (age range, 18-87 years), a total of 248 pedicle screws were placed in the cervical (C1-C7) and upper and midthoracic (T1-T8) spine. An automated iCT registration sequence was used for multisegmental instrumentation, with the reference frame fixed to either a Mayfield head clamp and/or the most distal spinous process within the instrumentation. Pediculation was performed with navigated drill guides or Jamshidi cannulas. The angular deviation between navigated tool trajectory and final implant positions (evaluated on postinstrumentation iCT or postoperative CT scans) was calculated to assess the accuracy of iCT-N. Final screw positions were also graded according to established classification systems. Mean follow-up was 16.7 months.

RESULTS:

Clinically significant screw misplacement or iCT-N failure mandating conversion to conventional technique did not occur. A total of 71.4% of patients self-rated their outcome as excellent or good at 12 months; 99.3% of cervical screws were compliant with Neo classification grades 0 and 1 (grade 2, 0.7%), and neurovascular injury did not occur. In addition, 97.8% of thoracic pedicle screws were assigned grades I to III of the Heary classification, with 2.2% grade IV placement. Accuracy of iCT-N progressively deteriorated with increasing distance from the spinal reference clamp but allowed safe instrumentation of up to 10 segments.

CONCLUSION:

Image-guided spinal instrumentation using iCT-N with automated referencing allows safe, highly accurate multilevel instrumentation of the cervical and upper and midthoracic spine. In addition, iCT-N significantly reduces the need for reregistration in multilevel surgery.

Atlantoaxial Transarticular Screw Fixation

BACKGROUND

Transarticular screw (TAS) fixation is our preferred method for stable internal fixation of the atlantoaxial joint because of its excellent outcomes, versatility, and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

In this article, we update our series of patients who have undergone TAS fixation, with attention to surgical technique, planning, complication avoidance, and anatomic suitability.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 269 patients (150 women, 119 men; average age, 52.9 years; age range, 17–90 years) who underwent placement of at least 1 TAS. In total, 491 TASs were placed for stabilization necessitated by various pathologic conditions. The mean follow-up period was 15.7 months (range, 0–106 months).

RESULTS

Fusion was achieved in 99% of 198 patients monitored until fusion or nonunion requiring revision, or for 2 years. Forty-five patients had a complication, for a rate of 16.7%. Five early patients had vertebral artery injuries, 1 of which was bilateral and fatal. No recent patients had vertebral artery injuries. Other complications did not result in neurologic morbidity. Review of all atlantoaxial fusions by the senior author (R.I.A.) revealed that the TAS fixation technique could be successfully applied in 86.7% of sides considered. The main reasons for inapplicability were anatomic (recognized on preoperative planning) in 77% and abandonment secondary to concern about possible vertebral artery injury on the first side attempted in 13.8%.

CONCLUSION

The placement of TASs is safe and effective for stabilizing the atlantoaxial articulation. Refinements in technique, such as 3-dimensional stereotactic workstation for trajectory planning, have reduced the rate of serious complications. Clinical outcomes are excellent, with nearly 100% of patients achieving stable bony union.

Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Fusion

BACKGROUND

C1–C2 fusion has significantly advanced from predominantly wiring/cable modalities to more biomechanically stable screw-rod techniques. Minimally invasive surgical techniques represents the most recent modification of atlantoaxial fixation. The indications, rationale, and surgical technique of this novel procedure are described.

METHODS

Six patients requiring C1–C2 fusion (5 type II odontoid fractures and 1 os odontoideum) underwent minimally invasive C1–C2 fusion over a 2-year period. The cohort consisted of 5 men and 1 woman with a mean age of 51 years (age range, 39–64 y). All 6 patients underwent bilateral segmental atlantoaxial fixation using an expandable tubular retractor.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 32 months (age range, 24–46 mo) There were no intraoperative complications, and the mean estimated blood loss was 100 mL. Solid fusion was achieved in all 6 patients, without pathological motion on dynamic studies. Postoperative computed tomographic images showed no hardware malposition in the scanned patients (4 of the 6 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Placement of C1 and C2 instrumentation using minimally invasive techniques is technically feasible. Because the instrumentation and the means of obtaining arthrodesis do not differ substantively from the standard approach, we would not anticipate long-term results to be different from those of an open procedure, apart from the approach-related morbidity.

SAFE ZONE FOR C1 LATERAL MASS SCREWS

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possible complications of overpenetrated C1 lateral mass screws and to identify and define a “safe zone” area anterior to the C1 vertebra.

METHODS

The study was performed on 10 cadavers and 50 random patients who had undergone computed tomographic scanning with contrast medium of the neck for other purposes. Atlas lateral mass screw trajectories were plotted, and the safe zone for screw placement anterior to the atlas vertebra was determined for each trajectory.

RESULTS

The trajectory of the internal carotid artery was measured from its medial wall. The trajectory of the internal carotid artery according to the ideal entrance point of the screw was 11.55 ± 4.55 degrees (range, 2–22 degrees) in the cadavers and 9.78 ± 4.55 degrees (range, −5 to 22 degrees) bilaterally in the patients. At 15 degrees (ideal screw trajectory), the thickness of the rectus capitis anterior muscle and longus capitis muscle was 6.69 ± 0.83 mm (range, 5.32–7.92 mm) in the cadavers and 7.29 ± 1.90 mm (range, 0.50–13.63 mm) bilaterally in the patients. The smallest distance from the internal carotid artery to the anterior cortex of the C1 vertebra was calculated as 4.33 ± 2.03 mm (range, 1.15–8.40 mm) bilaterally in the cadavers and 5.07 ± 1.72 mm (range, 2.15–8.91 mm) bilaterally in radiological specimens.

CONCLUSION

The internal carotid artery trajectory is lateral to the ideal entrance point of C1 lateral mass screws. The medial angulation of a screw placed in the lateral mass of C1 seemed to increase the margin of safety for the internal carotid artery. The rectus capitis anterior and longus capitis muscles may be thought of as a safe zone area for C1 lateral mass screws. At more than 25 degrees of medial angulation, the risk of perforation of the oropharyngeal wall increases.

Anatomia do sulco da artéria vertebral

INTRODUÇÃO: Diversas técnicas cirúrgicas têm sido realizadas na região craniocervical devido a diversas patologias. Durante o acesso cirúrgico a essa região existe um risco potencial de lesão iatrogênica da artéria vertebral, relacionado ao acesso lateral amplo e à avaliação inadequada da anatomia local. Variações no trajeto da artéria vertebral ocasionam maior risco de lesão vascular. O estudo pré-operatório por imagem da anatomia da artéria vertebral e do seu sulco tem sido realizado para aumentar a segurança cirúrgica. OBJETIVO: Estudar a morfometria da artéria vertebral no atlas através da tomografia computadorizada do sulco da artéria vertebral (SAV) em 30 atlas isolados de cadáveres. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: O SAV e suas relações com a linha média foram avaliados através de oito medidas lineares e duas angulares, bilateralmente. A média, valor máximo e mínimo, e desvio padrão foram calculados para cada parâmetro. RESULTADOS: O SAV apresentou uma maior largura e maior espessura do lado esquerdo (p<0,05) CONCLUSÃO: os nossos dados sugerem que a dissecção posterior e superior do arco posterior devem permanecer a uma distância lateral de 11,2mm e 7,4mm da linha média para que haja segurança no procedimento.

SURGICAL TREATMENT OF OCCIPITOCERVICAL INSTABILITY

OBJECTIVE

Instability of the occipitocervical junction can be a challenging surgical problem because of the unique anatomic and biomechanical characteristics of this region. We review the causes of instability and the development of surgical techniques to stabilize the occipitocervical junction.

METHODS

Occipitocervical instrumentation has advanced significantly, and modern modular screw-based constructs allow for rigid short-segment fixation of unstable elements while providing the stability needed to achieve successful fusion in nearly 100% of patients. This article reviews the preoperative planning, the variety of instrumentation and surgical strategies, as well as the postoperative care of these patients.

RESULTS

Current constructs use occipital plates that are rigidly fixed to the thick midline keel of the occipital bone, polyaxial screws that can be placed in many different trajectories, and rods that are bent to approximate the acute occipitocervical angle. These modular constructs provide a variety of methods to achieve fixation in the atlantoaxial complex, including transarticular screws or C1 lateral mass screws in combination with C2 pars, C2 pedicle, or C2 translaminar trajectories.

CONCLUSION

Surgical techniques for occipitocervical instrumentation and fusion are technically challenging and require meticulous preoperative planning and a thorough understanding of the regional anatomy, instrumentation, and constructs. Modern screw-based techniques for occipitocervical fusion have established clinical success and demonstrated biomechanical stability, with fusion rates approaching 100%.

Cadaveric study for placement of occipital condyle screws: technique and effects on surrounding anatomic structures

Object

The occipital condyle has never been studied as a viable structure that could permit bone purchase by fixation devices for occipitocervical fusion. The authors propose occipital condyle screw placement as a possible alternative to conventional occipitocervical fixation techniques.

Methods

Six adult cadaver heads (12 total occipital condyles) were studied, and the StealthStation image-guidance system was used for preoperative planning of occipital condyle screw placement. Morphometric studies of the occipital condyle were performed. A 3.5-mm Vertex screw was then placed in the occipital condyle with image-guided assistance in 3 specimens. Operations in the remaining 3 specimens proceeded using anatomical markers and calculated degrees of angulation for screw placement with a free-hand technique. Postoperatively the cadaver heads were rescanned and reanalyzed to determine the success of screw placement and its effect on hypoglossal canal volume.

Results

All screws were successfully placed with no sign of lateral or medial cortical breach. Two screws had bicortical purchase. There was no change in hypoglossal canal volume in any specimen.

Conclusions

Occipital condyle screw placement is a safe and viable option for occipitocervical fixation and could be a preferred procedure in selected cases. However, further biomechanical studies are required to compare its reliability to other more established techniques.

Is rheumatoid arthritis a risk factor for a high-riding vertebral artery?

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study on the morphologic characteristics of the axis in patients with or without rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the morphologic risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation between patients with or without RA.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

VA injury is a potentially serious complication during atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation. Although this operation is frequently performed on RA patients, there have been few comparative studies on the morphologic risk of VA injury between RA and non-RA patients.

METHODS

A total of 107 three-dimensional computed tomography images of the cervical spine including the C1-C2 complex were evaluated. Forty-seven RA patients and 60 non-RA patients were included in the study. The maximum atlantoaxial transarticular screw diameter (MSD) that could be inserted without breaching the cortex was measured 3-dimensionally using a computer- assisted navigation system. A high-riding-VA carrier was defined as a patient with either MSD of 4 mm or less. In RA patients, the space available for the spinal cord in flexion (SAC in flexion), duration of disease, RA stage, and type of disease were examined.

RESULTS

In the RA group, 45 of 94 MSDs (47.9%) were 4 mm or less, and 33 of 47 patients (70.2%) were high-riding-VA carriers. In the non-RA group, 11 of 120 MSDs (9.2%) were 4 mm or less, and 9 of 60 (15.0%) patients were high-riding-VA carriers. MSD, C3 A-P diameter, and the ratio of MSD to C3 A-P diameter were significantly smaller in the RA group than in the non-RA group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that SAC in flexion was a significant risk factor for a high-riding-VA carrier in the RA group.

CONCLUSION

RA was a significant risk factor for the presence of a high-riding VA. When performing atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation, particularly on RA patients, thorough preoperative evaluation of the bony architecture is of great importance to avoid inadvertent VA injury.

Fixation strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The internal carotid artery and hypoglossal nerve lie over the anterior aspect of the lateral mass of the atlas and are at risk from bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws. This has led to the recommendation for unicortical screws if the neurovascular structures are in close proximity to the proposed exit point. No data are available on strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws.

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical pullout strength of unicortical versus bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws in a cadaveric model.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study.

METHODS

Fifteen cervical spine specimens underwent axial pullout testing. A unicortical C1-C2 transarticular screw was placed on one side with a contralateral bicortical screw. Data were analyzed to reveal any significant differences in strength.

RESULTS

Mean pullout strength for the bicortical C1-C2 transarticular screws was 1,048.8 (+/-360.1) N versus 939.2 (+/-360.6) for unicortical screws (p=.22). There was no significant difference in the pullout strength of unicortical and bicortical screws.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases with satisfactory bone quality, it appears reasonable to use unicortical screws to avoid the risk of neurovascular injury from penetrating the anterior cortex of C1.

Rheumatoid arthritis as a risk factor for a narrow C-2 pedicle: 3D analysis of the C-2 pedicle screw trajectory

Object

Vertebral artery (VA) injury is a potentially serious complication of C-2 pedicle screw (PS) fixation. Although this surgery is frequently performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), few studies have compared the risk of VA injury in patients with and without RA. In this study, the authors compare the morphological risk of VA injury relating to C-2 PS fixation in patients with and without RA.

Methods

A total of 110 3D CT images of the cervical spine including the axis were evaluated. Fifty patients with RA and 60 patients without RA were included in the study. The maximum PS diameter (MPSD) that could be used at C-2 without breaching the cortex was measured in 3D using a computer-assisted navigation system. A narrow-pedicle carrier was defined as a patient with an MPSD of 4 mm or less.

Results

In the RA group, 42 of 100 MPSDs were ≤ 4 mm, and 30 of 50 patients (60%) were narrow-pedicle carriers. In the non-RA group, 10 of 120 MPSDs (8%) were ≤ 4 mm, and 8 of 60 (13%) patients were narrow-pedicle carriers. The MPSD, the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of C-3, and the ratio of MPSD to the AP diameter of C-3 were significantly smaller in the RA group than in the non-RA group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that RA and narrow C-3 AP diameter were significant risk factors for a narrow-pedicle carrier.

Conclusions

Rheumatoid arthritis is a significant risk factor for a narrow C-2 pedicle. When performing PS placement at C-2, particularly in patients with RA, thorough preoperative evaluation of the bone architecture is very important for avoiding inadvertent injury to the VA.

Treatment of upper cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis patients

The cervical spine, especially the upper cervical spine, is a common focus of destruction by rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because of its potentially debilitating and life-threatening sequelae, cervical spine involvement remains a priority in the diagnosis and treatment of RA. Many studies show that early surgical intervention gives a more satisfactory outcome. Surgery aims to establish spinal stability and to prevent neurological deterioration and injury to the spinal cord, leading to improved neurological function. The recent sophisticated screw-rod-plate technique allows one to obtain a solid fixation of the upper cervical spine with a high possibility of bone union even in RA patients. Although surgery of the occipitoatlantoaxial region is a challenge with many possibilities of serious complications, recent advances in the surgical technique, complete understanding of the anatomy, and precise preoperative evaluation have decreased complication rates. Early consultation with a specialized spine surgeon is mandatory once cervical involvement is suspected in an RA patient because once the patient becomes myelopathic, the rate of long-term mortality increases and the chance of neurological recovery decreases.

Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective survey.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the present incidence and management of iatrogenic vertebral artery injury (VAI) during cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

VAI is a rare complication of cervical spine surgery, but it may be catastrophic. Anterior cervical decompression (ACD) and posterior atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation (Magerl fixation) have been the main causes, with reported incidences of 0.3% to 0.5% and 0% to 8.2%, respectively. Popular new surgical techniques, such as cervical pedicle screw or C1 lateral mass screw fixation, also entail the potential risk of VAI.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to our affiliated hospitals requesting information regarding iatrogenic VAI during cervical spine surgery.

RESULTS

Seven spine surgeon groups and 25 general orthopedist groups responded to the questionnaire, with a response rate of 89%. The overall incidence of VAI was 0.14% (8 cases among 5641 cervical spine surgeries). The incidence in anterior cervical decompression procedures was 0.18% and that in Magerl fixation was 1.3%. Inexperienced surgeons tended to commit VAI more frequently. One case of VAI during C1 lateral mass screw fixation was included, whereas there was no case of VAI caused by cervical pedicle screw fixation. In the case of "VAI in the screw hole," hemostasis was obtained by tamponade or screw insertion, whereas "VAI in the open space" sometimes caused uncontrollable bleeding, in which embolization eventually stopped the bleeding. There were no deaths or apparent neurologic sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of VAI during cervical spine surgery from this survey was similar to or slightly less than that in the literature. Tamponade was effective in many cases, but prompt consultation with an endovascular team is recommended if the bleeding is uncontrollable. Preoperative careful evaluation of the vertebral artery seems to be most important to prevent iatrogenic VAI and to avoid postoperative neurologic sequelae.

Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Anatomic study of the internal carotid artery (ICA) location with respect to C1 based on computed tomography (CT) scans with contrast medium.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the location of the ICA relative to the anterior aspect of C1 to assess the risk of placing C1-C2 transarticular or C1 lateral mass screws.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Vertebral artery injury is a known risk from placement of screws in C1. A previous case report revealed an ideally placed C1-C2 transarticular screw abutting and narrowing the ICA. The risk of ICA injury from C1 screws is unknown.

METHODS

Fifty random head and neck CT scans with contrast medium were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements were taken bilaterally including the closest distance from the ICA lumen to C1 and the distance from the medial edge of the ICA to a line drawn along the medial border of the foramen transversarium. The risk of inserting bicortical C1-C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass screws was estimated based on these measurements.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the ICA to C1 was 2.88 mm on the left and 2.89 mm on the right. The ICA lumen was medial to the foramen transversarium in 42 (84%) of 50 cases (mean: 2.78 mm on the left and 3.00 mm on the right). The proximity of the ICA to C1 posed moderate risk in 46% of cases and high risk in 12% (on at least one side).

CONCLUSION

Because of the risk of ICA injury from a drill bit or the tip of a bicortical screw, we recommend preoperative CT scan with contrast medium in all cases in which a screw is to be placed into C1. If the ICA is in close proximity to the anterior border of C1, unicortical fixation or a different fusion technique should be considered.

Current concepts and applications of computer navigation in orthopedic trauma surgery

Navigation has become widely integrated into regular endoprosthetic procedures, but clinical use of navigation systems in orthopaedic trauma has only been implemented in a few indications. Navigation systems enable an accuracy of 1 mm or 1 degree. Navigation can achieve higher precision when it is combined with different imaging modalities, including preoperative computer tomography (CT), intraoperative CT, two-dimensional fluoroscopy, and, recently, intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy. The precision of the navigation system can be influenced by the surgeon as well as by the camera system, type of reference marker, and the registration process. Recent developments in orthopedic trauma navigation allow for bilateral femoral anteversion measurements, noninvasive registration of an uninjured thigh, and intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based pedicle screw placement. Although the use of navigation has provided initial positive results in trauma care, prospective clinical studies remain to be performed.

Transarticular screw fixation using neuronavigation: Technique

BACKGROUND

Transarticular screw placement needs highly accurate imaging. We assess the efficacy and accuracy of C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation using neuronavigation and also cast a technical note on the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included a total of nine patients who underwent transarticular screw fixation using the neuronavigation system. A total of 15 screws were placed. All patients underwent postoperative CT scan with 3-Dimensional (3-D) reconstruction to check for the accuracy of implantation.

RESULTS

One patient had encroachment of the transverse foramen but there was no vertebral artery injury. There were no clinical complications or adverse sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Neuronavigation is extremely helpful in C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation and gives excellent accuracy.

Anterior retropharyngeal fixation C1-2 for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities: study of feasibility, technical description and preliminary results

Posterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 with the Magerl technique is a challenging procedure for stabilization of atlantoaxial instabilities. Although its high primary stability favoured it to sublaminar wire-based techniques, the close merging of the vertebral artery (VA) and its violation during screw passage inside the axis emphasizes its potential risk. Also, posterior approach to the upper cervical spine produces extensive, as well as traumatic soft-tissue stripping. In comparison, anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2 is an atraumatic technique, but has been neglected in the literature, even though promising results are published and lectured to date. In 2004, anterior screw fixation C1-2 was introduced in our department for the treatment of atlantoaxial instabilities. As it showed convincing results, its general anatomic feasibility was worked up. The distance between mid-sagittal line of C2 and medial border of the VA groove resembles the most important anatomic landmark in anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Therefore, CT based measurements on 42 healthy specimens without pathology of the cervical spine were performed. Our data are compiled in an extended collection of anatomic landmarks relevant for anterior transarticular screw fixation C1-2. Based on anatomic findings, the technique and its feasibility in daily clinical work is depicted and discussed on our preliminary results in seven patients.

Die rheumatisch bedingte Instabilität der oberen Halswirbelsäule

Rheumatic manifestation at the cervical spine occurs in more than 50% of all cases in the natural course of this disease. The first cervical manifestation takes place in the upper cervical spine. The initial involvement of the C1/C2 segment leads to atlantodental subluxation. Progressive destruction can result in vertical instability, which is characterized by cranial subluxation of the odontoid process with the danger of resulting stenosis and cervical myelopathy. The goal of diagnosis has to be the early recognition of these changes to establish an effective treatment protocol. Persistent pain, neurological deficits, and progressive radiological signs for instability are indications for operative stabilizing procedures. These procedures avoid progressive destruction and improve the prognosis regarding pain decrease, regression of neurological deficits, and life expectancy.

Transarticular screw fixation for osteoarthritis of the atlanto axial segment

Atlantoaxial (C1-C2) facet joint osteoarthitis is a distinct clinical syndrome that often goes unrecognized. Severe pain resistant to conservative treatment that is corroborated by the radiographic findings represents the indication for surgery. The aim of this study was to retrospectively examine the long-term outcome [after an average 6.5 years (SD 4.0)] of C1-2 fusion for osteoarthritis of the atlantoaxial segment in 35 consecutive patients [25 male, 10 female; aged 62 (SD 15) years]. At follow-up, clinical outcome and radiological status was examined in 27/35 (77%) patients, and self-rated pain and disability (Neck Pain and Disability Scale; NPDS) in 29/35 (83%) patients. In 27/35 patients (77%), 2 screws were inserted; in 7 patients (20%), only 1 screw; and in 1 patient (3%), no screws. 11% of the patients had late complications requiring revision surgery. All patients showed solid fusion at the long-term follow-up. 26% patients showed an improvement in sensory disturbances, 63% no change, and 11% a worsening. 89% were pain-free or had markedly reduced pain. The average score on the NPDS (0-100) was 34 (SD 27), representing 'mild' neck problems, and the average pain intensity (0-5 VAS) was 1.5 (SD 1.5). Eighty-five percent of the patients declared that they would make the same decision again to undergo surgery. In conclusion, in a group of patients with a painful and debilitating degenerative disorder of C1-2, posterior transarticular atlantoaxial fusion proved to be an effective treatment with a low rate of serious complications.

Virtual placement of posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation

We wanted to evaluate how often safe and effective posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement is realizable when it is performed according to guidelines given in the literature. In 50 adult patients, computerized tomography scan data from C0 to C3 were transformed into a 3D spine model. Virtually, bilateral screws were placed from the medial third of the C2-C3 facet joint towards the rim of the C1 anterior arc parallel to midline. Three categories of virtual screw position were rated: optimal (virtual screw inside the C2 pars interarticularis, transversing the middle third of the atlantoaxial joint, and sparing the vertebral artery canal), suboptimal (virtual screw violating the C2 pars interarticularis, and/or transversing the lower or upper third of the C1-C2 joint, and sparing vertebral artery canal), and unacceptable (virtual screw breaching the vertebral artery canal). Optimal placement was seen in 74, suboptimal placement in 11, and unacceptable locations in 15 sites. We conclude that due to the variability of the anatomy of the upper cervical spine, optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw placement is not possible in up to 26%, and even hazardous in up to 15%.