The influence of dosage, age, and comedication on steady state plasma lamotrigine concentrations in epileptic children: a prospective study with preliminary assessment of correlations with clinical response

The reference range of lamotrigine in the treatment of epilepsy in children: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This study intends to assess the reference range of lamotrigine concentration for treating childhood epilepsy.

METHODS

PubMed, Ovid-Embase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang data and VIP databases were searched from database inception to January 2022. RCT, cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study that estimated the reference range of lamotrigine for children epilepsy treatment were included. The data extracted included basic information, statistical methods, data type, and results of reference range. Descriptive analysis was performed for them.

RESULTS

8 studies were included and estimated the reference range, and all of them were calculated based on efficacy data and/or concentration data. Statistical methods including ROC curve, concentration-effect curve, mean ± standard deviation, 95% confidence interval and percentile interval were utilized. For lamotrigine monotherapy, the lower limits ranged from 2.06 mg/L to 3.99 mg/L, and the upper limits ranged from 8.43 mg/L to 9.08 mg/L, showing basic consistency. However, for lamotrigine concomitant with valproate, the lower limits ranged from 2.00 mg/L to 8.00 mg/L, and the upper limit was 11.50 mg/L, for lamotrigine concomitant with other antiepileptics, the lower limits ranged from 1.00 mg/L to 3.09 mg/L, and the upper limits varied from 5.90 mg/L to 16.24 mg/L, indicating inconsistency.

CONCLUSION

Several studies have estimated the reference range of lamotrigine for childhood epilepsy, while controversy exist and no studies have determined the upper limit of the range based on safety data. To establish the optimal reference range, further high-quality studies are necessary that consider both efficacy and safety data.

Redefining the age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine for patients with epilepsy: A step towards optimizing treatment and increasing cost-effectiveness

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine exhibits age-related characteristics. Nevertheless, current evidence regarding the therapeutic range of lamotrigine has been derived almost exclusively from studies in adult patients, and the applicability of this therapeutic range to the pediatric population remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to establish the appropriate age-specific therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine corresponding to adequate clinical responses for patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study of therapeutic drug monitoring included 582 Chinese epilepsy patients receiving lamotrigine monotherapy. Patients were divided into three age-related subgroups: (1) toddler and school-age group (2-12 years old, n = 168), (2) adolescent group (12-18 years old, n = 171), and (3) adult group (>18 years old, n = 243). Patients with a reduction in seizure frequency of 50 % or greater than baseline were defined as responders, and the remaining patients were non-responders. The relationship between lamotrigine serum concentrations and clinical response was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve was generated to determine the representative cut-off values of lamotrigine trough levels, to distinguish responders from non-responders. The upper margin of the therapeutic range of lamotrigine was determined by developing concentration-effect curves for the three age-related subgroups.

RESULTS

The median trough levels of lamotrigine were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders from all three age-related groups (P < 0.0001). Results of logistic regression analysis revealed that higher serum concentrations of lamotrigine predicted a higher probability that seizure frequency would be reduced by more than 50 % compared to baseline (adjusted odds ratio: 1.228, 95 % CI: 1.137-1.327; P < 0.0001), and younger children were less likely to be responders (adjusted odds ratio: 1.027, 95 % CI: 1.012-1.043; P = 0.001). Based on a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, the optimal cut-off values for lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to clinical response were 3.29 mg/L, 2.06 mg/L, and 1.61 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. By reducing interpatient variability, the results of the concentration-effect curves suggested no additional clinical benefit from a continued increase of doses for lamotrigine concentrations exceeding 9.08 mg/L, 8.43 mg/L, and 10.38 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, adolescent group, and adult group, respectively. In conclusion, the therapeutic ranges of lamotrigine trough concentrations corresponding to adequate clinical response were 3.29-9.08 mg/L in the toddler and school-age group, 2.06-8.43 mg/L in the adolescent group, and 1.61-10.38 mg/L in the adult group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study determined age-specific therapeutic ranges corresponding to optimal clinical efficacy for lamotrigine. Our findings lay the foundation for catalyzing novel opportunities to optimize treatment and reduce therapeutic costs. Based on the age-specific therapeutic ranges identified in this study, individualized and cost-effective algorithms for lamotrigine treatment of epilepsy patients may be developed and validated in larger cohort studies of therapeutic drug monitoring.

Population Pharmacokinetics Modeling of Lamotrigine in Jordanian Epileptic Patients Using Dried Blood Spot Sampling

AIMS

To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in Jordanian epileptic patients and to identify factors affecting therapeutic parameters.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A population pharmacokinetics model for lamotrigine was established based on a prospectively collected data of 52 steady-state concentrations from 38 adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine concentrations were determined by a dried blood spot liquid chromatography method. Data were analyzed according to a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination using the nonlinear mixed effect modeling program. The covariates effect of total body weight, gender, age, and co-medication with topiramate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and valproic acid on lamotrigine clearance were investigated using a stepwise forward addition followed by a stepwise backward elimination.

RESULTS

The final population pharmacokinetics model for lamotrigine clearance was as follows: CL/F_pop=θ₁*exp ^(θ3*age)*exp ^{(θ5*carbamazepine)}*exp ^{(θ6*valproic acid)} , where θ₁ is the relative clearance (L/hr) estimated, and θ₃, θ₅, and θ₆ are the fixed parameters relating to age and co-medication with carbamazepine and valproic acid, respectively.The population mean value of lamotrigine total clearance generated in the final model (with covariates) was 2.12 L/hr. Inter-individual variability and residual unexplained variability expressed as the coefficient of variation was 37.1 and 26.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine total clearance in the Jordanian patients is comparable to that reported by others for Caucasian patients. Age and concomitant therapy with carbamazepine and valproic acid significantly affected lamotrigine clearance, and accounted for 48% of its inter-individual variability.

Remedial dosing recommendations for delayed or missed doses of lamotrigine in pediatric patients with epilepsy using Monte Carlo simulations

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the effect of delayed or missed doses on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lamotrigine (LTG) in children with epilepsy and established remedial dosing recommendations for nonadherent patients.

METHODS

The Monte Carlo simulation based on a published LTG population PK model was used to assess the effect of different scenarios of nonadherence and the subsequently administered remedial regimens. The following three remedial approaches were investigated for each delayed dose: A) A partial dose was administered immediately, and the regular dose was administered at the next scheduled time. B) The delayed dose was administered immediately, followed by a partial dose at the next scheduled time. C) The delayed and partial doses were coadministered immediately, the next scheduled dose was skipped, and the regular dosing was resumed at the subsequent scheduled time. The most appropriate remedial regimen was that with the shortest deviation time from the individual therapeutic window.

RESULTS

The effect of nonadherence on PK was dependent on the delay duration and daily dose, and the recommended remedial dose was related to the delay duration and concomitant antiepileptic drugs. Remedial dosing strategies A and B were almost equivalent, whereas C showed a larger PK deviation time. If one dose was missed, double doses were not recommended for the next scheduled time.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulations provide quantitative insight into the remedial regimens for nonadherent patients, and clinicians should select the optimal regimen based on the status of patients.

Pharmacokinetic considerations for anti-epileptic drugs in children

INTRODUCTION

Epilepsy is a chronic and debilitating neurological disease, with a peak of incidence in the first years of life. Today, the vast armamentarium of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) available make even more challenging to select the most appropriate AED and establish the most effective dosing regimen. In fact, AEDs pharmacokinetics is under the influence of important age-related factors which cannot be ignored. Areas covered: Physiological changes occurring during development age (different body composition, immature metabolic patterns, reduced renal activity) can significantly modify the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs (adsorption, volume of distribution, half-life, clearance), leading to an altered treatment response. We reviewed the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of AEDs used in children, focusing on age-related factors which are of relevance when treating this patient population. Expert opinion: To deal with this pharmacokinetic variability, physicians have at their disposal two tools: 1) therapeutic drug concentration monitoring, which may help to set the optimal therapeutic regimen for each patient and to monitor eventual fluctuation, and 2) the use of extended-release drug formulations, when available. In the next future, the development of 'ad-hoc' electronic dashboard systems will represent relevant decision-support tools making the AED therapy even more individualized and precise, especially in children.

The influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs on lamotrigine serum concentrations in Northwest Chinese Han population with epilepsy

Objective

The aims of this study were to identify the influencing factors such as gender, age, dose and combinations of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), especially in triple combinations on the pharmacokinetic of Lamotrigine (LTG) in epilepsy patients of Northwest Chinese Han population.

Methods

Data of the LTG concentration and clinical information were analyzed retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Clinical Pharmacy Laboratory of Xi’an Central Hospital between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2018. The independent-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA analysis and Bonferroni and Tamhane T3 post-hoc test, the stepwise multivariate regression analysis were adopted by IBM SPSS, version 22.0.

Results

226 serum samples met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. The mean LTG serum concentration was 5.48±3.83 μg/mL. There were no gender differences (P = 0.64), and there were no significant effects by age on LTG serum concentration after age stratification (3–14 years old, 14-45 years old, 45–59 years old) (P = 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the daily LTG dose and co-administration of other AEDs significantly affected LTG serum concentrations. Combination with enzyme-inducer AEDs, the mean steady-state LTG concentration could be decreased by 30.73% compared with LTG monotherapy. Among enzyme-inducer AEDs, particularly strong inducer Carbamazepine (CBZ) could decrease the mean LTG concentration by 53.65%, but weak inducer AEDs such as Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and Topiramate (TPM) had no effect, Valproic acid (VPA) could increase the mean LTG concentration by 93.95%, and the inducer only partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of VPA in triple combination.

Conclusions

There were no significant gender and age effects, but the LTG daily dose and co-administration of other AEDs significantly affected LTG serum concentration. Combination with enzyme-inducer AEDs, especially CBZ could significantly decrease LTG serum concentrations, VPA could significantly increase LTG serum concentrations, and the inducer only partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of VPA in triple combination. In the clinical setting, these findings can help to estimate LTG concentrations and adjust dosage and evaluate adverse drug reactions.

The Impact of Pharmacokinetic Interactions With Eslicarbazepine Acetate Versus Oxcarbazepine and Carbamazepine in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new anti-epileptic drug (AED) chemically related to oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) and is increasingly used in clinical practice. The purpose of the study was to investigate 2-way pharmacokinetic interactions between ESL and other AEDs as compared to OXC and CBZ.

METHODS

Anonymous data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses and serum concentration measurements of ESL, OXC, CBZ and lamotrigine (LTG) and other AEDs were retrieved from 2 therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) databases in Norway. Drugs were categorized according to their known potential for interactions. Concentration/dose (C/D) ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Data from 1100 patients were available. The C/D ratios of ESL and OXC were unchanged in combination with enzyme-inducing AEDs or valproate (VPA). The C/D ratio of CBZ decreased by 40% and 22% in combination with other enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA, respectively, pointing to an increased clearance. ESL demonstrated no significant enzyme-inducing effect on LTG metabolism although there was a 20% and 34% decrease in the C/D ratio of LTG in combination with OXC and CBZ, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Possible pharmacokinetic interactions have been studied for ESL as compared to OXC and CBZ. The pharmacokinetics of ESL is not affected by enzyme-inducing AEDs or VPA and does not affect the metabolism of LTG in contrast to OXC and CBZ. The study demonstrates the value of using TDM databases to explore the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions of new AEDs.

Lamotrigine serum levels: Ceiling effect in people with epilepsy in remission?

BACKGROUND

Antiepileptic drug titration in epilepsy remains mostly empirical. Since in practice seizure remission may be obtained with low doses, we aimed to determine whether patients in remission have lower lamotrigine levels than those with ongoing seizures.

METHODS

Retrospective comparison of the distribution of lamotrigine levels among unselected patients in remission and with ongoing seizures. Remission was defined as 3 times the longuest interseizure interval and at least one year. Only trough levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2014, we identified 93 adults, among whom 10 were in remission. Patients in remission had significantly (p=0.008) lower serum levels (median 2.3mg/L, range: 0.7-8.2) than those with ongoing seizures (median 5.4mg/L, range: 1.1-18.2). We did not find any patient in remission with levels higher than 8.2mg/L. Distribution of dosages also differed among the groups, but less significantly (median: 175 vs 300mg, p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

An association between lamotrigine serum levels and seizure response can be observed. This suggests the existence of a ceiling level, above which remission is unlikely and should prompt antiepileptic medication switch rather than further up-titration of lamotrigine in drug-naïve patients with epilepsy.

Correlation between the Efficacy of Lamotrigine and the Serum Lamotrigine Level during the Remission Phase of Acute Bipolar II Depression: A Naturalistic and Unblinded Prospective Pilot Study

Lamotrigine has acute antidepressant effects in patients with bipolar disorder. However, there is little information regarding appropriate serum levels of lamotrigine and the time until remission after the start of lamotrigine therapy in patients with bipolar II depression. This was a naturalistic and unblinded prospective pilot study. Twelve patients' depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at the start of treatment and at the time of remission, and blood samples were obtained at the time of remission. Mahalanobis distance was used to analyze the relationship between the MADRS improvement rate and the serum lamotrigine level. Furthermore, we calculated the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for the relationship between the MADRS improvement rate and the serum lamotrigine level, and produced box plots of the serum lamotrigine level at remission and the time until remission. The Mahalanobis distance for the patient that was co-administered lamotrigine and valproic acid differed significantly from those of the other patients (p<0.001). There was no linear relationship between the serum lamotrigine level and the MADRS improvement rate among the patients that did not receive valproic acid. The median time from the start of lamotrigine therapy until remission was 6 weeks. The serum lamotrigine level does not have an important impact on the acute therapeutic effects of lamotrigine on bipolar II depression. In addition, we consider that different treatment options should be considered for non-responders who do not exhibit any improvement after the administration of lamotrigine for approximately 6 weeks.

The effects of co-medications on lamotrigine clearance in Japanese children with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Although it has been reported that some antiepileptic drugs have inducing or inhibiting effects on lamotrigine (LTG) clearance, whether they have the same effects in Asian epilepsy patients as in those in other countries has not been clarified, especially in children. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of co-medications on LTG clearance in Japanese children with epilepsy.

METHODS

A total of 342 routine serum concentration measurements of LTG in 102 Japanese epilepsy patients under 20years of age were reviewed. The dose-corrected concentration (DCC) of LTG was calculated as [concentration]/[dose/(body weight)], and the DCC of LTG was compared by co-medication. The difference in the DCC of LTG was compared between patients with and without valproic acid (VPA) and between those with and without drugs inducing glucuronic acid conjugation (phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and phenobarbital (PB)).

RESULTS

The DCC of LTG was significantly higher in patients on VPA and significantly lower in patients on drugs inducing glucuronic acid conjugation than in patients on LTG monotherapy. The DCC of LTG was significantly higher in patients on CBZ than in patients on PHT or PB. There was no correlation between the DCC of LTG and the concentration of VPA or metabolic inducers within the therapeutic range. Other antiepileptic drugs including clobazam, clonazepam, zonisamide, and levetiracetam had little effect on LTG concentration.

CONCLUSION

LTG concentration changes dramatically with concomitant antiepileptic drugs in Japanese children, as previously reported from other countries, and special attention is required. Although the dose of LTG should be adjusted when starting or discontinuing VPA or metabolic inducers, no adjustment is needed when changing the dose of VPA or metabolic inducers in the therapeutic range.

Antiepileptic dosing for critically ill adult patients receiving renal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate current literature for dosing recommendations for the use of antiepileptic medications in patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT).

DATA SOURCES

With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian specialized in pharmacy and toxicology, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, WorldCat, and Scopus through May 2016.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Four hundred three articles were screened for inclusion, of which 130 were identified as potentially relevant. Micromedex® DRUGDEX as well as package inserts were used to obtain known pharmacokinetic properties and dosage adjustment recommendations in RRT if known.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data regarding antiepileptic drug use in RRT are limited and mostly consist of case reports limiting our proposed dosing recommendations. Known pharmacokinetic parameters should guide dosing, and recommendations are provided where possible.

CONCLUSION

Additional studies are necessary before specific dosing recommendations can be made for most antiepileptic drugs in critically ill patients receiving RRT, specifically with newer agents.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update

Epilepsies occur across the entire age range, and their incidence peaks in the first years of life and in the elderly. Therefore, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used at the extremes of age. Rational prescribing in these age groups requires not only an understanding of the drugs' pharmacodynamic properties, but also careful consideration of potential age-related changes in their pharmacokinetic profile. The present article, which updates a review published in 2006 in this journal, focuses on recent findings on the pharmacokinetics of new-generation AEDs in neonates, infants, children, and the elderly. Significant new information on the pharmacokinetics of new AEDs in the perinatal period has been acquired, particularly for lamotrigine and levetiracetam. As a result of slow maturation of the enzymes involved in glucuronide conjugation, lamotrigine elimination occurs at a particularly slow rate in neonates, and becomes gradually more efficient during the first months of life. In the case of levetiracetam, elimination occurs primarily by renal excretion and is also slow at birth, but drug clearance increases rapidly thereafter and can even double within 1 week. In general, infants older than 2-3 months and children show higher drug clearance (normalized for body weight) than adults. This pattern was confirmed in recent studies that investigated the pediatric pharmacokinetics of several new AEDs, including levetiracetam, rufinamide, stiripentol, and eslicarbazepine acetate. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, drug clearance is generally reduced compared with younger adults because of less efficient drug-metabolizing activity, decreased renal function, or both. This general pattern, described previously for several AEDs, was confirmed in recent studies on the effect of old age on the clearance of felbamate, levetiracetam, pregabalin, lacosamide, and retigabine. For those drugs which are predominantly eliminated by renal excretion, aging-related pharmacokinetic changes could be predicted by measuring creatinine clearance (CLCR). Overall, most recent findings confirm that age is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs. However, pharmacokinetic variability at any age can be considerable, and the importance of other factors should not be disregarded. These include genetic factors, co-morbidities, and drug interactions, particularly those caused by concomitantly administered AEDs which induce or inhibit drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Lamotrigine and its applications in the treatment of epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders

Lamotrigine is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, initially approved in 1994 for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and for the generalized seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in pediatric (>2 years old) and adult populations. Its role in the treatment of bipolar disorder type I has also been well established. In addition, lamotrigine has been successfully used for the management of other neurological conditions such as migraines and neuropathic pain, and preliminary data show promising results. It has favorable pharmacokinetic properties and is generally well tolerated. The small risk of serious skin rash can be minimized with slow titration of the drug and dose adjustment with concomitant medications. Lamotrigine has demonstrated particular benefit in the treatment of women and elderly patients with epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetic variability of four newer antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate: a comparison of the impact of age and comedication

BACKGROUND

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used in patients with epilepsy. There is still insufficient documentation regarding pharmacokinetic variability of these AEDs in different patient groups.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare age and comedication as factors contributing to pharmacokinetic variability between 4 newer AEDs (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate) among patients with refractory epilepsy.

METHODS

Data regarding age, gender, use of AEDs, daily doses, and serum concentration measurements were retrieved from a therapeutic drug monitoring database, from patients admitted to the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, 2007-2008.

RESULTS

In total, 1050 patients were included, 111 younger children (2-9 years), 137 older children (10-17 years), 720 adults (18-64 years), 82 elderly (65-93 years). Fifty percent of the patients were prescribed polytherapy, in 88 different combinations. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability was extensive, as illustrated by a 10-fold variability in serum concentration compared with dose. Age affected the apparent clearance of levetiracetam to the largest extent, as shown by a 60% increase in younger children and a 40% reduction in the elderly, respectively, compared with adults. Comedication altered the clearance of lamotrigine to the greatest extent ±70% because it is affected by both enzyme inducers and inhibitors. Hepatic enzyme inducers increased the clearance of levetiracetam and topiramate by 25% and oxcarbazepine by 75%. Valproic acid reduced the clearance of topiramate by 25%.

CONCLUSION

Age and comedication are important contributors to pharmacokinetic variability. Age had the greatest impact on levetiracetam, and comedication affected the clearance of each of the 4 AEDs investigated in this study. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions must be carefully considered when multidrug therapies are prescribed. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a valuable tool for individualizing AED therapy.

Lamotrigine serum concentration in children with epilepsy

The correlation between lamotrigine serum concentration, efficacy, and toxicity in children is controversial. The database of the Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory at Assaf Harofeh Medical Center was retrospectively searched to identify lamotrigine serum concentrations in children aged 2-19 years with refractory epilepsy who received lamotrigine as monotherapy or polytherapy from 2007-2010. Data collected included age at epilepsy onset, additional antiepileptic drugs, lamotrigine dose, monthly seizure frequency before and after lamotrigine treatment, and side effects. Sixty blood samples were collected from 42 children aged 10.1 ± 4.9 years (range, 2-20 years). Seizure types included complex partial (n = 28), simple partial (n = 7), absence (n = 2), and generalized tonic-clonic (n = 23). Decreased seizure frequency was observed in 38 (63.3%) patients. No correlation with lamotrigine serum concentration was evident, but seizure frequency was significantly influenced by age and lamotrigine dose. Side effects were reported in 21 (35%) patients. Only diplopia was significantly correlated with lamotrigine serum concentration. Lamotrigine was more effective at lower doses and in older children. Lamotrigine serum concentration correlated significantly with diplopia, but not with other side effects or with clinical efficacy. Overall, lamotrigine is effective and safe in children with refractory epilepsy.

Influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs on plasma lamotrigine concentration in adult Japanese epilepsy patients

Lamotrigine (LTG) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that was approved in Japan in 2008. We evaluated the influence of AEDs that induce hepatic enzymes (including phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), carbamazepine (CBZ)), valproic acid (VPA), and various combinations of these drugs, on plasma LTG concentration in adult Japanese epilepsy patients. A total of 621 patients (mean age 34.4±11.8 years) were evaluated retrospectively. We calculated the concentration to dose ratio (CD ratio) for LTG with different AED regimens, and employed multiple regression analysis to determine factors influencing the LTG concentration. There was a linear correlation between the dose and concentration of LTG in patients treated with LTG (group I), LTG+VPA (group II), LTG+inducers (group III), or LTG+VPA+inducers (group IV). The mean CD ratio of patients on LTG monotherapy was 1.43±0.4 (μg/mL)/(mg/kg). When LTG was combined with VPA, the CD ratio increased about 2.2-fold, but there was no significant correlation between the CD ratio and VPA concentration. The mean CD ratios calculated in patients receiving LTG+PHT, LTG+PB, and LTG+CBZ were 0.56, 0.84, and 0.91, respectively. Addition of PHT significantly reduced the CD ratio in a concentration-dependent manner, in comparison with PB and CBZ (p<0.005 and p<0.001, respectively). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that the coefficient of determination of groups I, II, III, and IV were 0.94, 0.94, 0.90, and 0.91, respectively. In the clinical setting, these findings can help to estimate LTG concentrations and predict the inducing or inhibiting effects of concomitant AEDs.

Host factors affecting antiepileptic drug delivery-pharmacokinetic variability

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay in the treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common serious chronic neurological disorders. AEDs display extensive pharmacological variability between and within patients, and a major determinant of differences in response to treatment is pharmacokinetic variability. Host factors affecting AED delivery may be defined as the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine the AED delivery to the site of action, the epileptic focus. Individual differences may occur in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. These differences can be determined by genetic factors including gender and ethnicity, but the pharmacokinetics of AEDs can also be affected by age, specific physiological states in life, such as pregnancy, or pathological conditions including hepatic and renal insufficiency. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs are another important source of variability in response to AEDs. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the presently available AEDs are discussed in this review as well as their clinical implications.

Specific safety and tolerability considerations in the use of anticonvulsant medications in children

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders in the pediatric age range, and the majority of affected children can be safely and effectively treated with antiepileptic medication. While there are many antiepileptic agents on the market, specific drugs may be more efficacious for certain seizure types or electroclinical syndromes. Furthermore, certain adverse effects are more common with specific classes of medication. Additionally patient-specific factors, such as age, race, other medical conditions, or concurrent medication use may result in higher rates of side effects or altered efficacy. Significant developmental changes in gastric absorption, protein binding, hepatic metabolism, and renal clearance are seen over the pediatric age range, which impact pharmacokinetics. Such changes must be considered to determine optimal dosing and dosing intervals for children at specific ages. Furthermore, approximately one third of children require polytherapy for seizure control, and many more take concurrent medications for other conditions. In such children, drug–drug interactions must be considered to minimize adverse effects and improve efficacy. This review will address issues of antiepileptic drug efficacy, tolerability and ease of use, pharmacokinetics, and drug–drug interactions in the pediatric age range.

Impact of age, weight and concomitant treatment on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lamotrigine metabolism may be substantially altered with concomitant administration of valproic acid and/or carbamazepine. Such alterations may require the adjustment of lamotrigine dose to ensure optimal treatment efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The extent of lamotrigine interactions was investigated dependent on age, gender, weight and dose of concomitant carbamazepine and/or valproic acid in 65 patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine plasma steady-state oral clearance (CLss/F) and area under the curve (AUCss) were calculated from the dose of drug, average steady-state concentration (Css) and interval of administration. Multiple regression analysis was used for the identification and quantification of factors that influenced lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Age and dose of carbamazepine and valproic acid had significant influence on lamotrigine CLss/F and AUCss. Carbamazepine was associated with a dose-dependent increase and valproic acid with a dose-dependent decrease of lamotrigine metabolism rate. The effect of carbamazepine was more pronounced. Younger patients were expected to metabolize lamotrigine more rapidly whereas overweight patients may be less susceptible to interactions. Gender had no influence on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine may be altered by concomitant administration of carbamazepine and valproic acid. The models developed may be useful for estimating doses of lamotrigine for individual patients to minimize clinically significant interactions. Therapeutic monitoring is advisable when those drugs are used concomitantly.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.

Lamotrigine in clinical practice: long-term experience in patients with refractory epilepsy referred to a tertiary epilepsy center

Lamotrigine (LTG, Lamictal), one of the newer antiepileptic drugs, was admitted to the Dutch market in 1996. It was first used as adjunctive therapy and later as a monotherapy in partial and generalized epilepsy. All patients who started on LTG in 1996 or 1997 in the Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe (n=314) were enrolled in this study and followed for 48 months. The data indicate that the retention rates for LTG after 1, 2, 3, and 4 years are respectively 74.4, 69.3, 63.1, and 55.6%. Patients with normal cognitive function were more likely to continue than patients with mental retardation. The main reason for discontinuing LTG therapy was lack of efficacy (19.1%). Four patients (1.4%) were seizure-free for the total follow-up period of 48 months. The most frequently reported negative side effects were dizziness and headache, both in patients who continued and in those who discontinued therapy. A large percentage of patients also reported positive side effects like "feeling/being more active" and "feeling more clear/more responsive." For the whole patient group, the plasma level of LTG was measured 277 times. Plasma levels of LTG were influenced by the patients' comedications. Plasma levels of LTG in groups taking LTG in monotherapy, LTG plus an inducer, and LTG plus valproate were 8.7, 4.8, and 8.7 mg/L, respectively. The correlation between measured plasma level and dose confirm the manufacturer's dose recommendations. The manufacturer recommends half the dosage of lamotrigine monotherapy when the patient also uses valproate. When the patient uses an inducer, the dosage of LTG must be two times the dose used in monotherapy.

Rapid HPLC analysis of the antiepileptic lamotrigine and its metabolites in human plasma

A liquid chromatographic method with diode array detection (DAD) has been developed for the analysis of the antiepileptic agent lamotrigine (LTG) and its metabolites, lamotrigine 2-N-glucuronide and 2-N-methylated in plasma samples. The analytes were separated on a C8 RP column, using a mobile phase composed of methanol and a 0.45 mM, pH 3.5 phosphate buffer containing 0.17% triethylamine (24:76 v/v). Melatonin was used as the internal standard (IS). The DAD detector was set at 220 nm for the detection of all the analytes. A simple protein precipitation with methanol guaranteed high extraction yield values (>90%) and good purification from matrix interference. Good linearity was obtained in the 0.1-15.0 microg/mL range for LTG and lamotrigine 2-N-glucuronide and in the 0.1-2.0 microg/mL range for lamotrigine 2-N-methylated. The analytical method was validated in terms of precision, extraction yield, and accuracy. These assays gave RSD% values for precision always lower than 4.3% and mean accuracy higher than 80%. The method seems to be suitable for the analysis of plasma samples from patients treated with Lamictal.

Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs

Some patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy benefit from combination therapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Additionally, virtually all epilepsy patients will receive, at some time in their lives, other medications for the management of associated conditions. In these situations, clinically important drug interactions may occur. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone induce many cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glucuronyl transferase (GT) enzymes, and can reduce drastically the serum concentration of associated drugs which are substrates of the same enzymes. Examples of agents whose serum levels are decreased markedly by enzyme-inducing AEDs, include lamotrigine, tiagabine, several steroidal drugs, cyclosporin A, oral anticoagulants and many cardiovascular, antineoplastic and psychotropic drugs. Valproic acid is not enzyme inducer, but it may cause clinically relevant drug interactions by inhibiting the metabolism of selected substrates, most notably phenobarbital and lamotrigine. Compared with older generation agents, most of the recently developed AEDs are less likely to induce or inhibit the activity of CYP or GT enzymes. However, they may be a target for metabolically mediated drug interactions, and oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, felbamate and, at high dosages, topiramate may stimulate the metabolism of oral contraceptive steroids. Levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin have not been reported to cause or be a target for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions involving AEDs have not been well characterized, but their understanding is important for a more rational approach to combination therapy. In particular, neurotoxic effects appear to be more likely with coprescription of AEDs sharing the same primary mechanism of action.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetic evaluation in epileptic patients submitted to VEEG monitoring

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lamotrigine (LTG) in epileptic patients submitted to video-electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring and, in addition, to investigate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the kinetics of LTG.

METHODS

The analysis assumed a one-compartment open model with first-order absorption and elimination. The kinetic estimates obtained in this population were validated by using the Prediction-Error approach. The influence of medication was also assessed by the calculation of the LTG concentration-to-dose ratio. Patients (n=135) were divided into four groups according to the co-medication: Group 1, patients taking LTG with enzyme-inducer agents; Group 2, patients receiving LTG with valproic acid; Group 3, patients receiving both inducers and inhibitors of LTG metabolism; Group 4, patients under AEDs not known to alter LTG metabolism.

RESULTS

The obtained estimates for clearance (CL) (L/h/kg) [0.075+/-0.029 (Group 1), 0.014+/-0.005 (Group 2), 0.025+/-0.008 (Group 3) and 0.044+/-0.011 (Group 4)] appear to be the most appropriate set to be implemented in clinical practice as prior information, as demonstrated by the accuracy and precision of the measurements. In addition, the influence of co-medication on the LTG profile was further confirmed by the basal LTG concentration-to-dose ratio.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present investigation may contribute to achieving the goal of optimizing patients' clinical outcomes by managing their medication regimen through measured drug concentrations. Patients submitted to VEEG monitoring may benefit from this study, as the results may be used to provide better drug management in this medical setting.

Pharmacokinetic variability of new antiepileptic drugs at different ages

Newer generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used to treat epilepsies in infants, children, and the elderly. For rational prescribing in these populations, it is essential to understand the pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging. Data obtained in recent years indicate that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, vigabatrin, and felbamate is considerably higher in children than in adults,the magnitude of the difference being on average in the order of 20%to 120%, depending on the drug and the age distribution of the assessed population. Information on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in newborns is completely lacking or very sparse. Studies in the elderly have demonstrated that significant pharmacokinetic changes also occur at the other extreme of age. On average, CL/F values of newer generation AEDs have been found to be reduced by 10% to 50% compared with those found in young or middle-aged adults. These pharmacokinetic changes are clinically important and con-tribute to age-related differences in dosage requirements.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of New-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs at the Extremes of Age

In recent years, several new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in clinical practice. These agents, which include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide, are being increasingly used in the treatment of epilepsy at the extremes of age. For a rational prescribing of these drugs in specific age groups, major pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging need to be taken into consideration. A review of available evidence indicates that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of new-generation AEDs in children is increased by 20-170% (depending on the type of drug and characteristics of the patients studied) compared with adults, with the highest CL/F values usually being observed in the youngest age groups. These findings do not necessarily apply to the first weeks of life, when drug eliminating capacity is still undergoing maturation, as in the case of lamotrigine for which preliminary data suggest that CL/F in neonates aged <2 months can be much lower than in infants aged 2-12 months. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, CL/F is almost invariably reduced (on average by 10-50%) compared with values found in non-elderly adults. Age-related CL/F changes, together with the large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, contribute to the need for individualised dosage requirements in these patients. Measurement of serum drug concentrations can be useful as an aid to dosage individualization in these age groups but interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data should also take into account the possibility of age-related changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity and, for neonates and the elderly, alterations in drug binding to serum proteins.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Properties of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies

Although valproate is considered to be the drug of first choice for the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGEs), other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), both old (ethosuximide, clobazam, and clonazepam) and new (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, and zonisamide) are also available. These AEDs do not appear to have a common mechanism of action in that both inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA; e.g., clobazam, clonazepam, and valproate) and excitatory glutamate (e.g., lamotrigine and topiramate) mechanisms are involved. Ethosuximide primarily acts by blocking T-type voltage-gated calcium channels in thalamic neurones while topiramate and zonisamide have multiple mechanisms of action. In contrast, levetiracetam is unique in that it may act via a specific binding site in the brain. In terms of their pharmacokinetic characteristics, all eight AEDs are rapidly absorbed after oral ingestion with peak blood concentration being achieved within 1-4 hours. Bioavailability is 100% with the exception clonazepam (90%) and topiramate (81-95%). Plasma protein binding is variable with valproate (90%), clobazam (85%) and clonazepam (86%) showing substantial binding, lamotrigine (55%) and zonisamide (50%) intermediate binding, and levetiracetam (0%), ethosuximide (0%) and topiramate (10%) being minimally bound. However, the binding by zonisamide is complicated by its binding to erythrocytes as well as albumin. All AEDs, with the exception of lamotrigine and levetiracetam, undergo elimination as a result of extensive metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are highly amenable to induction and inhibition by other drugs and therefore susceptible to pharmacokinetic interactions. Lamotrigine metabolism is via hepatic glucuronidation, a process that is also susceptible to induction and inhibition by concurrent drugs. Levetiracetam is minimally metabolized (by hydrolysis in blood), is excreted predominantly unchanged in urine, and to date has not been associated with any clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions. Using a semiquantitative pharmacokinetic rating system, based on 16 pharmacokinetic characteristics, a direct comparison between AEDs is possible. Thus valproic acid, regarded as the drug of first choice in the treatment of IGEs, rates lowest with respect to favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, mostly because of its nonlinear pharmacokinetics, extensive hepatic metabolism, and its high propensity to interact both with other AEDs and non-AEDs. Levetiracetam rates highest with topiramate in second place.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling in rats

The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling of lamotrigine following its acute administration to rats. Adult male Wistar rats were given 10 mg/kg of lamotrigine intraperitoneally. Plasma and brain samples were obtained at predetermined times over 120 h post-dose and analysed by liquid chromatography. The anticonvulsant profile against maximal electroshock seizure stimulation was determined over 48 h after dosing. As a linear relationship between lamotrigine plasma and brain profiles was observed, only the plasma data set was used to establish the PK/PD relationship. To fit the effect-time course of lamotrigine, the PK/PD simultaneous fitting link model was used: the pharmacokinetic parameters and dosing information were used in the one-compartment first-order model to predict concentrations, which were then used to model the pharmacodynamic data with the sigmoid Emax model, in order to estimate all the parameters simultaneously. The following parameters were obtained: Vd = 2.00 L/kg, k(abs) = 8.50 h(-1), k(el) = 0.025 h(-1), k(e0) = 3.75 h(-1), Emax = 100.0% (fixed), EC50 = 3.44 mg/L and gamma = 8.64. From these results, it can be stated that lamotrigine is extensively distributed through the body, its plasma elimination half-life is around 28 h and a lamotrigine plasma concentration of 3.44 mg/L is enough to protect 50% of the animals. When compared with humans, the plasma concentrations achieved with this dose were within the therapeutic concentration range that had been proposed for epileptic patients. With the present PK/PD modelling it was possible to fit simultaneously the time-courses of the plasma levels and the anticonvulsant effect of lamotrigine, providing information not only about the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in the rat but also about its anticonvulsant response over time. As this approach can be easily applied to other drugs, it becomes a useful tool for an explanatory comparison between lamotrigine and other antiepileptic drugs.

Analysis of lamotrigine and its metabolites in human plasma and urine by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography

A reliable micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatographic method was developed and validated for the determination of lamotrigine and its metabolites in human plasma and urine. The variation of different parameters, such as pH of the background electrolyte (BGE) and Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) concentration, were evaluated in order to find optimal conditions. Best separation of the analytes was achieved using a BGE composed of 10 mM borate and 50 mM SDS, pH 9.5; melatonin was selected as the internal standard. Isolation of lamotrigine and its metabolites from plasma and urine was accomplished with an original solid-phase extraction procedure using hydrophilic-lypophilic balance cartridges. Good absolute recovery data and satisfactory precision values were obtained. The calibration plots for lamotrigine and its metabolites were linear over the 1-20 microg/mL concentration range. Sensitivity was satisfactory; the limits of detection and quantitation of lamotrigine were 500 ng/mL and 1 microg/mL, respectively. The application of the method to real plasma samples from epileptic patients under therapy with lamotrigine gave good results in terms of accuracy and selectivity, and in agreement with those obtained with an high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs

There are two types of interactions between drugs, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic. For antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic interactions are the most notable type, but pharmacodynamic interactions involving reciprocal potentiation of pharmacological effects at the site of action are also important. By far the most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those involving cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in hepatic metabolism. Among old generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone induce the activity of several enzymes involved in drug metabolism, leading to decreased plasma concentration and reduced pharmacological effect of drugs, which are substrates of the same enzymes (eg, tiagabine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate). In contrast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide do not induce the metabolism of other AEDs. Interactions involving enzyme inhibition include the increase in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and phenobarbital caused by valproic acid. Among AEDs, the least potential interaction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer antiepileptic drugs

The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. Studies of the relationship between serum concentrations and clinical efficacy of these drugs are reviewed, and the potential value of TDM of the drugs is discussed based on their pharmacokinetic properties and mode of action. Analytical methods for the determination of the serum concentrations of these drugs are also briefly described. There are only some prospective data on the serum concentration-effect relationships, and few studies have been designed primarily to study these relationships. As TDM is not widely practiced for the newer AEDs, there are no generally accepted target ranges for any of these drugs, and for most a wide range in serum concentration is associated with clinical efficacy. Furthermore, a considerable overlap in drug concentrations related to toxicity and nonresponse is reported. Nevertheless, the current tentative target ranges for felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (10-hydroxy-carbazepine metabolite), tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide are 125 to 250 micromol/L, 70 to 120 micromol/L, 10 to 60 micromol/L, 35 to 120 micromol/L, 50 to 140 micomol/L, 50 to 250 nmol/L, 15 to 60 micromol/L, 6 to 278 micromol/L, and 45 to 180 micromol/L, respectively. Further systematic studies designed specifically to evaluate concentration-effect relationships of the new AEDs are urgently needed. Although routine monitoring in general cannot be recommended at present, measurements of some of the drugs is undoubtedly of help with individualization of treatment in selected cases in a particular clinical setting.

Influence of administration vehicles and drug formulations on the pharmacokinetic profile of lamotrigine in rats

Given that administration vehicles and drug formulations can affect drug bioavailability, their influence on the pharmacokinetic profile of lamotrigine (LTG), a new-generation anti-epileptic drug, was studied in rats. Three different formulations administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 10 mg/kg were used: (1) LTG suspended in a 0.25% methylcelulose solution, (2) LTG dissolved in a 50% propylene glycol solution, and (3) LTG isethionate dissolved in distilled water. Plasma and brain homogenate levels were determined in order to evaluate vehicle-dependent drug absorption. The results demonstrated rapid absorption of LTG when it was administered as an aqueous solution, in contrast to a slower and more erratic absorption after the injection of either the lipophilic solution or the suspension. A plasma peak was achieved 15 min post-dose with the aqueous solution, with a brain peak being achieved 15 min later, while with the other formulations both plasma and brain homogenate peaks were reached 2 h after LTG administration. This study suggests that LTG isethionate dissolved in distilled water is the most suitable formulation for successful LTG pharmacokinetic studies in rats.

Lamotrigine update and its use in mood disorders

OBJECTIVE

To provide a qualitative, systematic update and review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy in mood disorders, adverse effects, and costs of lamotrigine.

DATA SOURCES

Citations obtained from MEDLINE searches (1985-September 2001) using lamotrigine as a text word, articles identified in reference lists of pertinent articles, abstracts presented at conferences, and research data from GlaxoSmithKline.

DATA EXTRACTION

English-language articles were considered for possible inclusion. Each title and abstract was examined to determine whether the publication contained up-to-date information relevant to the objective. Twenty clinical trials that provided data on response rates in mood disorders were tabulated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lamotrigine's primary action is to modulate voltage-gated sodium channels. Evidence suggests that it decreases glutamate transmission, directly reduces calcium influx, mildly blocks transmitter reuptake, and alters intracellular mechanisms of resting transmitter release. The average half-life of lamotrigine is approximately 24 hours, but decreases to approximately 7.4 hours when used concurrently with phenytoin, and increases to approximately 59 hours with valproic acid. Seven of the 20 clinical trials were randomized, double-blind, and controlled. Existing data are inadequate to evaluate lamotrigine use in major depression. The pooled response rates for patients with depressed, manic, mixed, and rapid cycling bipolar disorder were similar, ranging from 52% to 63%. Adverse effects are infrequent when the drug is used alone, but become more frequent when lamotrigine is combined with other anticonvulsants. While most rashes are mild, approximately 1 in 500 patients develops exfoliative dermatitis. A slow upward dose titration is recommended to reduce the incidence of serious rash, but this may delay the attainment of adequate dosage for 6 weeks. Lamotrigine has positive effects on cognitive function, but occasionally produces insomnia. Lamotrigine costs 2-4 times more than lithium, carbamazepine, and generic valproic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

When efficacy, adverse effects, and cost are considered, lamotrigine should probably be reserved as a second-line agent for bipolar depression.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of routine monitoring of serum lamotrigine concentration.

DATA SOURCE

Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1990-January 2001). Key search terms included lamotrigine, pharmacokinetics, and epilepsy.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A decision-making algorithm was used to evaluate the clinical evidence to support or refute the routine use of serum lamotrigine concentrations to adjust doses. The value of serum lamotrigine concentration monitoring remains controversial, primarily because clear relationships between concentration and pharmacologic response (either efficacy or toxicity) have not been demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum concentration monitoring of lamotrigine is not recommended as a tool for routine dose adjustment.