Clinical study of lamotrigine and valproic acid in patients with epilepsy: using a drug interaction to advantage?

Drug-drug interactions that alter the exposure of glucuronidated drugs: Scope, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzyme selectivity, mechanisms (inhibition and induction), and clinical significance

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) arising from the perturbation of drug metabolising enzyme activities represent both a clinical problem and a potential economic loss for the pharmaceutical industry. DDIs involving glucuronidated drugs have historically attracted little attention and there is a perception that interactions are of minor clinical relevance. This review critically examines the scope and aetiology of DDIs that result in altered exposure of glucuronidated drugs. Interaction mechanisms, namely inhibition and induction of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes and the potential interplay with drug transporters, are reviewed in detail, as is the clinical significance of known DDIs. Altered victim drug exposure arising from modulation of UGT enzyme activities is relatively common and, notably, the incidence and importance of UGT induction as a DDI mechanism is greater than generally believed. Numerous DDIs are clinically relevant, resulting in either loss of efficacy or an increased risk of adverse effects, necessitating dose individualisation. Several generalisations relating to the likelihood of DDIs can be drawn from the known substrate and inhibitor selectivities of UGT enzymes, highlighting the importance of comprehensive reaction phenotyping studies at an early stage of drug development. Further, rigorous assessment of the DDI liability of new chemical entities that undergo glucuronidation to a significant extent has been recommended recently by regulatory guidance. Although evidence-based approaches exist for the in vitro characterisation of UGT enzyme inhibition and induction, the availability of drugs considered appropriate for use as 'probe' substrates in clinical DDI studies is limited and this should be research priority.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of lamotrigine-induced haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lamotrigine is currently known to be related to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Knowledge regarding the association between HLH and lamotrigine is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of lamotrigine-induced HLH.

METHODS

We collected literature from 1994 to 31 August 2020 in Chinese and English on HLH induced by lamotrigine for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 17 patients (12 men and 5 women) from 15 studies were included, with a median age of 29 years old (range 4-47). Symptoms of lamotrigine-induced HLH were reported to have occurred within 6-24 days following treatment initiation. Six cases reported doses that ranged from 25 mg every other day to 800 mg once daily. The major clinical features of lamotrigine-induced HLH are fever, cytopenia, rash and hyperferritinaemia. Bone marrow showed haemophagocytosis. Fifteen patients improved with drug discontinuation, and 2 patients eventually died.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a potentially serious adverse reaction to lamotrigine (LTG). Patients should be informed that if they experience any symptoms of HLH while taking lamotrigine, they should immediately seek medical attention.

Valproic acid autoinduction: a case-based review

Although valproic acid (VPA) induces the metabolism of multiple other drugs, the clinical reports of VPA autoinduction are rare. A comprehensive literature search yielded only one published case series, which provided the rationale to conduct a review of the published cases along with a new case of VPA autoinduction. Although there may be myriad of reasons for lack of published cases of VPA autoinduction, potential underreporting may be one of the core reasons. Lack of understanding into the highly complex metabolism of VPA may also make it difficult to recognize and report VPA autoinduction. However, it is important to mention that in addition to autoinduction increased elimination of VPA may be mediated by several pharmacokinetic (PK) factors, such as drug interactions, genetic polymorphisms of metabolic enzymes, and protein displacement reactions. As VPA is metabolized by multiple metabolic pathways, the risk for drug interactions is relatively high. There is also a growing evidence for high genetic inducibility of some enzymes involved in VPA metabolism. Protein displacement reactions with VPA increase the biologically active and readily metabolizable free fraction and pose a diagnostic challenge as they are usually not requested by most clinicians. Thus, monitoring of free fraction with total VPA levels may prevent clinically serious outcomes and optimize VPA treatment in clinically challenging patients. This case-based review compares the clinical data from three published cases and a new case of VPA autoinduction to enhance clinicians' awareness of this relatively rare but clinically relevant phenomenon along with a discussion of potential underlying mechanisms.

Reduction in N-Desmethylclozapine Level Is Determined by Daily Dose But Not Serum Concentration of Valproic Acid-Indications of a Presystemic Interaction Mechanism

BACKGROUND

Valproic acid (VPA) is frequently used together with clozapine (CLZ) as mood-stabilizer or for the prevention of seizures in patients with psychotic disorders. VPA is known to reduce levels of the pharmacologically active CLZ-metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (N-DMC), but factors determining the degree of this interaction are unknown. Here, we investigated the relationship between VPA dose and serum concentration on N-DMC levels in a large patient population adjusting for sex, age, and smoking habits as covariates.

METHODS

A total of 763 patients with steady-state serum concentrations of CLZ and N-DMC concurrently using VPA (cases, n = 76) or no interacting drugs (controls, n = 687) were retrospectively included from a therapeutic drug monitoring service at Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, between March 2005 and December 2016. In addition to information about prescribed doses, age, sex, smoking habits, and use of other interacting drugs were obtained. The effects of VPA dose and serum concentration on dose-adjusted N-DMC levels were evaluated by univariate correlation and multivariate linear mixed-model analyses adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

The dose-adjusted N-DMC levels were approximately 38% lower in VPA users (cases) versus nonusers (controls) (P < 0.001). Within the VPA cases, a negatively correlation between VPA dose and dose-adjusted N-DMC levels was observed with an estimated reduction of 1.42% per 100-mg VPA dose (P = 0.033) after adjusting for sex, age, and smoking. By contrast, there was no correlation between VPA serum concentration and dose-adjusted N-DMC levels (P = 0.873).

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that VPA dose, not concentration, is of relevance for the degree of reduction in N-DMC level in clozapine-treated patients. Presystemic induction of UGT enzymes or efflux transporters might underlie the reduction in N-DMC level during concurrent use of VPA. Our findings indicate that a VPA daily dose of 1500 mg or higher provides a further 21% reduction in N-DMC concentration. This is likely a relevant change in the exposure of this active metabolite where low levels are associated with implications of CLZ therapy.

Clinically Relevant Effect of UGT1A4*3 on Lamotrigine Serum Concentration Is Restricted to Postmenopausal Women-A Study Matching Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Genotype Data From 534 Patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the impact of the UGT1A4*3 variant allele on lamotrigine (LTG) exposure. As no studies have controlled for nongenetic factors, the aim of this study was to compare serum concentrations of LTG in carriers versus noncarriers of UGT1A4*3 adjusting for differences in age, sex, and valproic acid (VPA) comedication.

METHODS

Matched data on serum concentration of LTG and UGT1A4 genotype patients with known information about VPA comedication were included retrospectively from a therapeutic drug monitoring service. Linear mixed-model analysis was used to evaluate the impact of the UGT1A4*3 variant on dose-adjusted serum concentrations (C/D ratio) of LTG. Subanalyses were performed to assess the impact of UGT1A4*3 in relation to age, sex, and VPA comedication.

RESULTS

In total, 534 patients (1735 LTG serum concentrations) were included. In the study population, UGT1A4*3 carriers (n = 87; 16.3%) were estimated to have a 13% lower LTG C/D ratio compared with noncarriers (P = 0.01). Subanalyses showed that the quantitative impact of UGT1A4*3 was greatest in postmenopausal women (>50 years) without VPA comedication. In these patients (n = 99), UGT1A4*3 carriers displayed a 40% lower LTG C/D ratio than noncarriers (P = 0.001). The UGT1A4*3 variant had no significant effect on LTG C/D ratio in the other subpopulations (P > 0.1). Regardless of patient subgroup, the concomitant use of VPA was the strongest determinant of LTG exposure by increasing the C/D ratio 2.5-fold (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that UGT1A4*3 generally has a modest impact on LTG exposure, but it could lead to clinically relevant lowering in LTG serum concentration among postmenopausal women. The clinical impact of UGT1A4*3 in these patients needs to be assessed in relation to comedication with VPA, which is associated with a substantial increase in serum concentration of LTG.

Targeted screen for human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases inhibitors and the evaluation of potential drug-drug interactions with zafirlukast

Inhibition of drug metabolizing enzymes is a major mechanism in drug-drug interactions (DDIs). A number of cases of DDIs via inhibition of UDP-glucuronosyltranseferases (UGTs) have been reported, although the changes in pharmacokinetics are relatively small in comparison with drugs that are metabolized by cytochrome P450s. Most of the past studies have investigated hepatic UGTs, although recent studies have revealed a significant contribution of UGTs in the small intestine to drug clearance. To evaluate potential DDIs caused by inhibition of intestinal UGTs, we assessed inhibitory effects of 578 compounds, including drugs, xenobiotics, and endobiotics, on human UGT1A8 and UGT1A10, which are major contributors to intestinal glucuronidation. We identified 29 inhibitors by monitoring raloxifene glucuronidation with recombinant UGTs. All of the inhibitors potently inhibited UGT1A1 activity, as well. We found that zafirlukast is a potent general inhibitor of UGT1As and a moderate inhibitor of UGT2Bs because it monitors 4-methylumbelliferone glucuronidation by recombinant UGTs. However, zafirlukast did not potently inhibit diclofenac glucuronidation, suggesting that the inhibitory effects might be substrate specific. Inhibitory effects of zafirlukast on some UGT substrates were further investigated in human liver and human small intestine microsomes in order to evaluate potential DDIs. The R values (the ratios of intrinsic clearance with and without an inhibitor) revealed that zafirlukast has potential to cause clinical DDIs in the small intestine. Although we could not identify specific UGT1A8 and UGT1A10 inhibitors, zafirlukast was identified as a general inhibitor for UGTs in vitro. The present study suggests that the inhibition of UGT in the small intestine would be an underlying mechanism for DDIs.

Screening of six UGT enzyme activities in human liver microsomes using liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

Uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes are essential for the clearance of many drugs; however, altered UGT activity is a potential cause of adverse drug-drug interactions (DDI). The early detection of potential DDI is an important aspect of drug discovery that has led to the development of new screening methods for drug interactions. We developed a screening method for the simultaneous evaluation of six human liver UGT enzyme activites using in vitro cocktail incubation and tandem mass spectrometry.

METHODS

The two in vitro cocktail doses were developed to minimize drug interactions among substrates. The method is based on liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative modes was used to quantify the metabolites and the diagnostic loss of the glucuronosyl moiety to form the aglycone product was estimated using the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode.

RESULTS

The method was validated by comparing inhibition data obtained from the incubation of each individual probe substrate alone with data from the cocktail method. The intra- and inter-day accuracy and precision data for the six UGT metabolites ranged from 92.2 to 100.3% and less than 15.2%, respectively. The IC(50) values showed no significant differences between individual and cocktail incubations.

CONCLUSIONS

As a screening technique for inhibitory interactions of these six human liver UGT enzymes, this method will be useful for advancing mechanistic understanding of drug interactions.

Understanding and preventing drug-drug and drug-gene interactions

Concomitant administration of multiple drugs can lead to unanticipated drug interactions and resultant adverse drug events with their associated costs. A more thorough understanding of the different cytochrome P450 isoenzymes and drug transporters has led to new methods to try to predict and prevent clinically relevant drug interactions. There is also an increased recognition of the need to identify the impact of pharmacogenetic polymorphisms on drug interactions. More stringent regulatory requirements have evolved for industry to classify cytochrome inhibitors and inducers, test the effect of drug interactions in the presence of polymorphic enzymes, and evaluate multiple potentially interacting drugs simultaneously. In clinical practice, drug alert software programs have been developed. This review discusses drug interaction mechanisms and strategies for screening and minimizing exposure to drug interactions. We also provide future perspectives for reducing the risk of clinically significant drug interactions.

Impact of age, weight and concomitant treatment on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lamotrigine metabolism may be substantially altered with concomitant administration of valproic acid and/or carbamazepine. Such alterations may require the adjustment of lamotrigine dose to ensure optimal treatment efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The extent of lamotrigine interactions was investigated dependent on age, gender, weight and dose of concomitant carbamazepine and/or valproic acid in 65 patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine plasma steady-state oral clearance (CLss/F) and area under the curve (AUCss) were calculated from the dose of drug, average steady-state concentration (Css) and interval of administration. Multiple regression analysis was used for the identification and quantification of factors that influenced lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Age and dose of carbamazepine and valproic acid had significant influence on lamotrigine CLss/F and AUCss. Carbamazepine was associated with a dose-dependent increase and valproic acid with a dose-dependent decrease of lamotrigine metabolism rate. The effect of carbamazepine was more pronounced. Younger patients were expected to metabolize lamotrigine more rapidly whereas overweight patients may be less susceptible to interactions. Gender had no influence on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine may be altered by concomitant administration of carbamazepine and valproic acid. The models developed may be useful for estimating doses of lamotrigine for individual patients to minimize clinically significant interactions. Therapeutic monitoring is advisable when those drugs are used concomitantly.

Rational Polytherapy with Antiepileptic Drugs

Approximately 30-40% of patients do not achieve seizure control with a single antiepileptic drug (AED). With the advent of multiple AEDs in the past 15 years, rational polytherapy, the goal of finding combinations of AEDs that have favorable characteristics, has become of greater importance. We review the theoretical considerations based on AED mechanism of action, animal models, human studies in this field, and the challenges in finding such optimal combinations. Several case scenarios are presented, illustrating examples of rational polytherapy.

Excretion and metabolism of lersivirine (5-{[3,5-diethyl-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)(3,5-14C2)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]oxy}benzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile), a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, after administration of [14C]Lersivirine to healthy volunteers

Lersivirine [UK-453,061, 5-((3,5-diethyl-1-(2-hydroxyethyl)(3,5-14C2)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)oxy)benzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile] is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, with a unique binding interaction within the reverse transcriptase binding pocket. Lersivirine has shown antiviral activity and is well tolerated in HIV-infected and healthy subjects. This open-label, Phase I study investigated the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of a single oral 500-mg dose of [14C]lersivirine (parent drug) and characterized the plasma, fecal, and urinary radioactivity of lersivirine and its metabolites in four healthy male volunteers. Plasma C(max) for total radioactivity and unchanged lersivirine typically occurred between 0.5 and 3 h postdose. The majority of radioactivity was excreted in urine (approximately 80%) with the remainder excreted in the feces (approximately 20%). The blood/plasma ratio of total drug-derived radioactivity [area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinite time (AUC(inf))] was 0.48, indicating that radioactive material was distributed predominantly into plasma. Lersivirine was extensively metabolized, primarily by UDP glucuronosyltransferase- and cytochrome P450-dependent pathways, with 22 metabolites being identified in this study. Analysis of precipitated plasma revealed that the lersivirine-glucuronide conjugate was the major circulating component (45% of total radioactivity), whereas unchanged lersivirine represented 13% of total plasma radioactivity. In vitro studies showed that UGT2B7 and CYP3A4 are responsible for the majority of lersivirine metabolism in humans.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine when converting from a twice-daily immediate-release to a once-daily extended-release formulation in subjects with epilepsy (The COMPASS Study)

PURPOSE

To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lamotrigine (LTG) when converting from twice-daily immediate-release (LTG-IR) to once-daily extended-release (LTG-XR) in subjects with epilepsy.

METHODS

An open-label, conversion study was conducted, consisting of a 2-week LTG-IR Baseline Phase, followed by a 2-week LTG-XR Treatment Phase and a 1-week LTG-IR Phase. Forty-four subjects (> or =13 years of age) were enrolled and grouped as metabolically neutral (15), induced (15), or inhibited (14) based on the effects of the concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the clearance of LTG. The primary outcome was LTG PK parameters upon conversion. Secondary outcomes included seizure frequency, adverse events, and subject's preference.

RESULTS

LTG-XR and LTG-IR regimens were similar with respect to area under curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC (0-24)), apart from the induced group, where the AUC (0-24) of LTG-XR was on average 21% lower than for LTG-IR. A reduction in the LTG Cmax was observed for LTG-XR compared to LTG-IR resulting in a decrease in the peak-to-trough fluctuation in serum LTG concentrations. The steady-state, dose-normalized, trough concentrations for LTG-XR were similar to those of LTG-IR. The median time to peak concentration (Tmax) following administration of LTG-XR ranged from 4 to 6 h, 6 to 10 h, and 9 to 11 h in the induced, neutral, and inhibited groups, respectively. In comparison, the median Tmax following administration of LTG-IR was between 1 and 1.5 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Trough concentrations of LTG can be maintained on conversion from twice-daily LTG-IR to once-daily LTG-XR at the same total daily dose.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part II: prophylactic treatments

The present part II review highlights pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (excluding those of minor severity) of medications used in prophylactic treatment of the main primary headaches (migraine, tension-type and cluster headache). The principles of pharmacokinetics and metabolism, and the interactions of medications for acute treatment are examined in part I. The overall goal of this series of two reviews is to increase the awareness of physicians, primary care providers and specialists regarding pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of headache medications. The aim of prophylactic treatment is to reduce the frequency of headache attacks using beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, antidepressants, antiepileptics, lithium, serotonin antagonists, corticosteroids and muscle relaxants, which must be taken daily for long periods. During treatment the patient often continues to take symptomatic drugs for the attack, and may need other medications for associated or new-onset illnesses. DDIs can, therefore, occur. As a whole, DDIs of clinical relevance concerning prophylactic drugs are a limited number. Their effects can be prevented by starting the treatment with low dosages, which should be gradually increased depending on response and side effects, while frequently monitoring the patient and plasma levels of other possible coadministered drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Most headache medications are substrates of CYP2D6 (e.g., beta-blockers, antidepressants) or CYP3A4 (e.g., calcium-channel blockers, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, corticosteroids). The inducers and, especially, the inhibitors of these isoenzymes should be carefully coadministered.

Lamotrigine pharmacokinetic evaluation in epileptic patients submitted to VEEG monitoring

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile of lamotrigine (LTG) in epileptic patients submitted to video-electroencephalography (VEEG) monitoring and, in addition, to investigate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the kinetics of LTG.

METHODS

The analysis assumed a one-compartment open model with first-order absorption and elimination. The kinetic estimates obtained in this population were validated by using the Prediction-Error approach. The influence of medication was also assessed by the calculation of the LTG concentration-to-dose ratio. Patients (n=135) were divided into four groups according to the co-medication: Group 1, patients taking LTG with enzyme-inducer agents; Group 2, patients receiving LTG with valproic acid; Group 3, patients receiving both inducers and inhibitors of LTG metabolism; Group 4, patients under AEDs not known to alter LTG metabolism.

RESULTS

The obtained estimates for clearance (CL) (L/h/kg) [0.075+/-0.029 (Group 1), 0.014+/-0.005 (Group 2), 0.025+/-0.008 (Group 3) and 0.044+/-0.011 (Group 4)] appear to be the most appropriate set to be implemented in clinical practice as prior information, as demonstrated by the accuracy and precision of the measurements. In addition, the influence of co-medication on the LTG profile was further confirmed by the basal LTG concentration-to-dose ratio.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present investigation may contribute to achieving the goal of optimizing patients' clinical outcomes by managing their medication regimen through measured drug concentrations. Patients submitted to VEEG monitoring may benefit from this study, as the results may be used to provide better drug management in this medical setting.

IN VITRO CHARACTERIZATION OF LAMOTRIGINEN2-GLUCURONIDATION AND THE LAMOTRIGINE-VALPROIC ACID INTERACTION

Studies were performed to investigate the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzyme(s) responsible for the human liver microsomal N2-glucuronidation of the anticonvulsant drug lamotrigine (LTG) and the mechanistic basis for the LTG-valproic acid (VPA) interaction in vivo. LTG N2-glucuronidation by microsomes from five livers exhibited atypical kinetics, best described by a model comprising the expressions for the Hill (1869 +/- 1286 microM, n = 0.65 +/- 0.16) and Michaelis-Menten (Km 2234 +/- 774 microM) equations. The UGT1A4 inhibitor hecogenin abolished the Michaelis-Menten component, without affecting the Hill component. LTG N2-glucuronidation by recombinant UGT1A4 exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics, with a Km of 1558 microM. Although recombinant UGT2B7 exhibited only low activity toward LTG, inhibition by zidovudine and fluconazole and activation by bovine serum albumin (BSA) (2%) strongly suggested that this enzyme was responsible for the Hill component of microsomal LTG N2-glucuronidation. VPA (10 mM) abolished the Hill component of microsomal LTG N2-glucuronidation, without affecting the Michaelis-Menten component or UGT1A4-catalyzed LTG metabolism. Ki values for inhibition of the Hill component of LTG N2-glucuronidation by VPA were 2465 +/- 370 microM and 387 +/- 12 microM in the absence and presence, respectively, of BSA (2%). Consistent with published data for the effect of fluconazole on zidovudine glucuronidation by human liver microsomal UGT2B7, the Ki value generated in the presence of BSA predicted the magnitude of the LTG-VPA interaction reported in vivo. These data indicate that UGT2B7 and UGT1A4 are responsible for the Hill and Michaelis-Menten components, respectively, of microsomal LTG N2-glucuronidation, and the LTG-VPA interaction in vivo arises from inhibition of UGT2B7.

Effects of combined lamotrigine and valproate on basal and stimulated extracellular amino acids and monoamines in the hippocampus of freely moving rats

The antiepileptic drugs sodium valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) are increasingly used in combination in patients in whom monotherapy has failed to control seizures. Although these drugs are known to interact pharmacokinetically, several authors have proposed a pharmacodynamic interaction between the two. In order to investigate this we have studied the effects of combined treatment with LTG and VPA on basal and stimulated extracellular aspartate (ASP), glutamate (GLU), taurine (TAU), gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) release in the hippocampus of freely moving rats using microdialysis. Additionally, we measured the possible effect of VPA on LTG in plasma, whole brain and dialysates. Neither LTG (10 mg/kg) nor VPA (300 mg/kg) given alone significantly altered basal levels of ASP, GLU or TAU. When given together, however, the two drugs significantly reduced extracellular ASP and GLU while increasing TAU levels. In the case of GABA, LTG was without effect on basal levels of the transmitter, but these increased following VPA and this persisted with both drugs. When transmitter release was stimulated by 50 muM veratridine, marked increases in the release of all amino acids occurred and this was decreased by LTG in all cases. VPA alone only altered GABA release, increasing it by approximately the same extent as basal GABA. For all of the amino acids studied, however, VPA reversed the decreases in release seen after LTG. VPA and LTG increased and decreased respectively basal 5-HT and DA. When given together the increase in extracellular 5-HT was greatly prolonged, but no effect on DA release was seen. When 5-HT release was evoked by veratridine this was increased by VPA and no other treatment. With DA, however, neither drug alone altered evoked release, but the two combined led to a marked increase. Co-administration of VPA with LTG showed no significant effect of this combination on LTG in any of the three compartments studied indicating that in this case a significant pharmacokinetic contribution to our findings is unlikely, which suggests that there is a probable pharmacodynamic interaction of the two drugs.

Long-Term Follow-Up Using a Higher Target Range for Lamotrigine Monitoring

The aims of the study were (1) to review the clinical application of the higher target plasma lamotrigine (LTG) concentration of 3-14 mg/L previously proposed by our therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) laboratory following our initial study 7 years earlier, and (2) to survey clinical application of LTG assays by experienced neurologists (n = 11) who frequently use LTG. There was a 2.9-fold increase in LTG assay requests received by our laboratory from 1996 to 2003. By comparison, data for the number of LTG prescriptions filled throughout Australia were limited to the 4 years from 1997 to 2000, where a 1.7-fold increase was seen. LTG assay requests increased 1.5-fold in this same 4-year period (r2 = 0.97), indicating that the growth in assay requests paralleled the growth in prescriptions. The distribution of LTG concentrations measured in 2003 was compared with those for 1996 and 1997. This indicated there was a significantly increased (P < 0.01) clinical usage of the higher LTG target range. This result was reinforced by questionnaire responses. Respondents (100% of those surveyed), (1) considered the target LTG concentration (3-14 mg/L) to be one of the primary parameters applied in individualizing LTG dosage regimens, (2) were using target concentrations above 7 mg/L in 75% of patients, and (3) reported dose-limiting toxicities in some (but not all) patients typically at concentrations above, or well above, 13 mg/L. In conclusion, the growth in LTG assay requests received by our laboratory paralleled prescribing of this drug. The clinical use of the higher LTG target concentration range was increased during the 7 years since its introduction, indicating clinical acceptance and therapeutic benefit as well as the absence of long-term adverse effects associated with higher plasma LTG concentrations.

[Drug interactions with antiepileptic agents]

Drug interactions with antiepileptic agents are based in large part on pharmacokinetic mechanisms. Most prominent are induction or inhibition of enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system, which is of central importance for metabolic elimination of lipophilic xenobiotics. Potent inductors of CYP isoenzymes are carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone, thereby decreasing not only their own plasma levels and efficacy but also that of other antiepileptics and other drugs. Felbamate, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate are weak inductors of the CYP isoenzyme 3A4, whereas they inhibit CYP2C19. Valproic acid is a potent inhibitor of several CYP isoenzymes and glucuronyltransferases, resulting in an increase in plasma concentrations and toxicity of antiepileptics and other drugs. Antiepileptics that are not involved in drug interactions include gabapentin, levetiracetam, and vigabatrine. The P-glycoprotein may mediate the exit of antiepileptics from the brain. This transport mechanism is inhibited by carbamazepine, which may explain the enhanced clinical efficacy of a combination of carbamazepin with other antiepileptics. Other possible pharmacokinetic interactions are precipitation of antiepileptics in the stomach by antacids or sucralfate and displacement from plasmaprotein binding of one antiepileptic agent by another. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be helpful in assessing pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions appear to be responsible for the enhanced efficacy of antiepileptic combination therapy. In prescribing drugs, their spectrum of interactions has to be known.

Lamotrigine and valproate: efficacy of co-administration in a pediatric population

This study aimed to assess the risks and benefits of the co-administration of lamotrigine and valproate in a pediatric population with refractory epilepsy. Twenty-eight children who received lamotrigine and valproate during co-medication were evaluated. Outcome measurements were established according to efficacy in seizure control, adverse effects, and tolerability. Treatment was considered effective when >50% frequency reduction was obtained. Adverse effects were also analyzed and in patients who presented them the mode of administration was compared with those who did not to verify the importance of this factor. Association of lamotrigine and valproate was considered effective in 64.3% of all patients, regardless of the seizure type. Seizure-free status was obtained in six patients. Drop attacks and secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were reduced in five patients, who remained under treatment despite less than the satisfactory (<50%) seizure decrease. Tremor occurred in six patients; urinary incontinence and ataxia in one. Skin rash also occurred, as an early manifestation, in two patients, both with a previous history of hypersensitivity to antiepileptic drugs. Causes for discontinuation were inefficacy of treatment in six patients and presence of adverse effects in two. In our series, seizure control was obtained in most children with refractory epilepsy, some of whom had a previous history of unsatisfactory response to lamotrigine and valproate, either in monotherapy or polytherapy. Adverse effects were uncommon, but skin rash was observed in higher proportions than in other series with lamotrigine or valproate. Nevertheless, these risks may be lessened with slow introduction and by exclusion of patients with a previous history of hypersensitivity.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine using capillary electrophoresis. Evaluation of assay performance and quality assurance over a 4-year period in the routine arena

The performance of a capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)-based assay for lamotrigine (LAMO) in human plasma and serum with complete internal and external quality assurance over an extended period of time is reported. The assay, originally reported by Shihabi and Oles [J. Chromatogr. B 683 (1996) 119], is based upon protein precipitation by acetonitrile and analysis of an aliquot of the acidified supernatant and was adopted in our laboratory for routine use with multi-level internal calibration on different commercial instruments. Evaluation of the calibration and control data of 103 sets of analysis and data from four years of external quality assurance based upon analysis of four-monthly sera containing LAMO and eight other anticonvulsants in sub-therapeutic, therapeutic or toxicological concentration levels revealed the robustness of the CZE-based assay and its suitability for therapeutic drug monitoring of LAMO in a routine setting. CZE data obtained in single determinations were found to compare well with the spike values and the mean of HPLC data determined in 50-70 laboratories. Furthermore, the gathered data were evaluated retrospectively using single-level internal calibration. When applied with caution, this approach was determined to produce slightly higher but otherwise equivalent drug concentrations. For the 4 years of routine operation with external quality control, the reported laboratory ranking was between 19 (out of 67 participating laboratories) and 43 (69). This is the first account of a CZE-based drug assay with complete external quality assessment.

Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of valproate: a summary after 35 years of clinical experience

Thirty-five years since its introduction into clinical use, valproate (valproic acid) has become the most widely prescribed antiepileptic drug (AED) worldwide. Its pharmacological effects involve a variety of mechanisms, including increased gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic transmission, reduced release and/or effects of excitatory amino acids, blockade of voltage-gated sodium channels and modulation of dopaminergic and serotoninergic transmission. Valproate is available in different dosage forms for parenteral and oral use. All available oral formulations are almost completely bioavailable, but they differ in dissolution characteristics and absorption rates. In particular, sustained-release formulations are available that minimise fluctuations in serum drug concentrations during a dosing interval and can therefore be given once or twice daily. Valproic acid is about 90% bound to plasma proteins, and the degree of binding decreases with increasing drug concentration within the clinically occurring range. Valproic acid is extensively metabolised by microsomal glucuronide conjugation, mitochondrial beta-oxidation and cytochrome P450-dependent omega-, (omega-1)- and (omega-2)-oxidation. The elimination half-life is in the order of 9 to 18 hours, but shorter values (5 to 12 hours) are observed in patients comedicated with enzyme-inducing agents such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and barbiturates. Valproate itself is devoid of enzyme-inducing properties, but it has the potential of inhibiting drug metabolism and can increase by this mechanism the plasma concentrations of certain coadministered drugs, including phenobarbital (phenobarbitone), lamotrigine and zidovudine. Valproate is a broad spectrum AED, being effective against all seizure types. In patients with newly diagnosed partial seizures (with or without secondary generalisation) and/or primarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures, the efficacy of valproate is comparable to that of phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital, although in most comparative trials the tolerability of phenobarbital was inferior to that of the other drugs. Valproate is generally regarded as a first-choice agent for most forms of idiopathic and symptomatic generalised epilepsies. Many of these syndromes are associated with multiple seizure types, including tonic-clonic, myoclonic and absence seizures, and prescription of a broad-spectrum drug such as valproate has clear advantages in this situation. A number of reports have also suggested that intravenous valproate could be of value in the treatment of convulsive and nonconvulsive status epilepticus, but further studies are required to establish in more detail the role of the drug in this indication. The most commonly reported adverse effects of valproate include gastrointestinal disturbances, tremor and bodyweight gain. Other notable adverse effects include encephalopathy symptoms (at times associated with hyperammonaemia), platelet disorders, pancreatitis, liver toxicity (with an overall incidence of 1 in 20,000, but a frequency as high as 1 in 600 or 1 in 800 in high-risk groups such as infants below 2 years of age receiving anticonvulsant polytherapy) and teratogenicity, including a 1 to 3% risk of neural tube defects. Some studies have also suggested that menstrual disorders and certain clinical, ultrasound or endocrine manifestations of reproductive system disorders, including polycystic ovary syndrome, may be more common in women treated with valproate than in those treated with other AEDs. However, the precise relevance of the latter findings remains to be evaluated in large, prospective, randomised studies.

Concomitant use of divalproex sodium and lamotrigine in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and tolerability

Objective. Epilepsy in institutionalized severe developmentally disabled patients poses a therapeutic challenge. Frequently these patients have multiple seizure (sz) types that are often intractable. Both divalproex sodium (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) have demonstrated efficacy. We sought to examine the efficacy of this specific combination in a group of institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.Methods. Medical and pharmacy records of all patients with developmental disabilities and intractable seizures were reviewed to identify those who had received VPA and LTG. This retrospective evaluation was structured with respect to time frame and outcome measure. Phase 1 consisted of baseline monotherapy with VPA. Phase 2 consisted of titration/dose escalation. Phase 3 was treatment observation period with the combination of both. Seizure frequency and adverse effect data were obtained from nursing or residential staff records. Primary outcome measures were change in seizure frequency between Phases 1 and 3. Additional measures were percentage of patients seizure-free and those with >75% reduction in seizures. A Wilcoxan signed rank test was used for statistical analysis.Results. Of 293 patients, 25 (12M/13F, 31.7+/-10.2 years) had VPA monotherapy following which LTG was added. Mean doses of VPA and LTG were 1474+/-728 and 165+/-111mg/day, respectively. Baseline seizure frequency ranged from 1 to 25 per month. Mean seizure frequency significantly decreased (6.5+/-vs2.0+/-4.0seizures/month, P<0.001). Sixty-four percent of these patients had >/=75% reduction in seizures 28% became seizure-free.Conclusions. The combination of VPA and LTG appears efficacious in this group of developmentally disabled patients with intractable seizures. Rash, which has been associated with this combination, was notably absent and this may reflect the slower titration schedule used.

Lamotrigine update and its use in mood disorders

OBJECTIVE

To provide a qualitative, systematic update and review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy in mood disorders, adverse effects, and costs of lamotrigine.

DATA SOURCES

Citations obtained from MEDLINE searches (1985-September 2001) using lamotrigine as a text word, articles identified in reference lists of pertinent articles, abstracts presented at conferences, and research data from GlaxoSmithKline.

DATA EXTRACTION

English-language articles were considered for possible inclusion. Each title and abstract was examined to determine whether the publication contained up-to-date information relevant to the objective. Twenty clinical trials that provided data on response rates in mood disorders were tabulated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lamotrigine's primary action is to modulate voltage-gated sodium channels. Evidence suggests that it decreases glutamate transmission, directly reduces calcium influx, mildly blocks transmitter reuptake, and alters intracellular mechanisms of resting transmitter release. The average half-life of lamotrigine is approximately 24 hours, but decreases to approximately 7.4 hours when used concurrently with phenytoin, and increases to approximately 59 hours with valproic acid. Seven of the 20 clinical trials were randomized, double-blind, and controlled. Existing data are inadequate to evaluate lamotrigine use in major depression. The pooled response rates for patients with depressed, manic, mixed, and rapid cycling bipolar disorder were similar, ranging from 52% to 63%. Adverse effects are infrequent when the drug is used alone, but become more frequent when lamotrigine is combined with other anticonvulsants. While most rashes are mild, approximately 1 in 500 patients develops exfoliative dermatitis. A slow upward dose titration is recommended to reduce the incidence of serious rash, but this may delay the attainment of adequate dosage for 6 weeks. Lamotrigine has positive effects on cognitive function, but occasionally produces insomnia. Lamotrigine costs 2-4 times more than lithium, carbamazepine, and generic valproic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

When efficacy, adverse effects, and cost are considered, lamotrigine should probably be reserved as a second-line agent for bipolar depression.

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.

Population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine

The present study estimated the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in patients receiving oral lamotrigine therapy with drug concentration monitoring, and determined intersubject and intrasubject variability. A total of 129 patients were analyzed from two clinical sites. Of these, 124 patients provided sparse data (198 concentration-time points); nine patients (four from a previous group plus five from the current group) provided rich data (431 points). The population analysis was conducted using P-PHARM (SIMED Scientific Software, Cedex, France), a nonlinear mixed-effect modeling program. A single exponential elimination model (first-order absorption) with heteroscedastic weighting was used. Apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) were the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated. Covariate analysis was performed to determine which factors explained any of the variability associated with lamotrigine clearance. Population estimates of CL/F and V/F for lamotrigine generated in the final model were 2.14 +/- 0.81 L/h and 78.1 +/- 5.1 L/kg. Intersubject and intrasubject variability for clearance was 38% and 38%, respectively. The covariates of concomitant valproate and phenytoin therapy accounted for 42% of the intersubject variability of clearance. Age, gender, clinic site, and other concomitant antiepileptic drugs did not influence clearance. This study of the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in patients using the drug clinically provides useful data and should lead to better dosage individualization for lamotrigine.

Lamotrigine

Lamotrigine is a newly available antiepileptic drug with a broad spectrum of efficacy and a tolerability profile that is favorable for use in many patients. Problems with rash are related to rate of dose ascension and drug interactions with valproate. Efficacy in treatment of mood disorder and some pain syndromes will broaden the use of this unique compound.