Association Between Patient Age and Gabapentin Serum Concentration-to-Dose Ratio

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of 6 New-Generation Antiseizure Medications Using a Mass Spectrometry Method: Analysis of 2-Year Experience in a Large Cohort of Korean Epilepsy Patients

CONTEXT.—

New-generation antiseizure medications (ASMs) are increasingly prescribed, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been proposed to improve clinical outcome. However, clinical TDM data on new-generation ASMs are scarce.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of 6 new-generation ASMs in serum and analyze the clinical TDM data from a large cohort of Korean patients with epilepsy.

DESIGN.—

Stable isotope-labeled internal standards were added to protein precipitations of serum. One microliter of sample was separated on an Agilent Poroshell EC-C18 column, and lacosamide, perampanel, gabapentin, pregabalin, vigabatrin, and rufinamide were simultaneously quantified by Agilent 6460 triple-quad mass spectrometer in multiple-reaction monitoring mode. Linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, specificity, carryover, extraction recovery, and matrix effect were evaluated. TDM data of 458 samples from 363 Korean epilepsy patients were analyzed.

RESULTS.—

The method was linear with limit of detection less than 0.05 μg/mL in all analytes. Intraassay and interassay imprecisions were less than 5% coefficient of variation. Accuracy was within ±15% bias. Extraction recovery ranged from 85.9% to 98.8%. A total of 88% (403 of 458) were on polypharmacy, with 29% (118 of 403) using concomitant enzyme inducers. Only 38% (175 of 458) of the concentrations were therapeutic, with 53% (244 of 458) being subtherapeutic. Drug concentration and concentration-to-dose ratio were highly variable among individuals for all 6 ASMs.

CONCLUSIONS.—

A simple and rapid LC-MS/MS method for TDM of 6 ASMs was developed and successfully applied to clinical practice. These large-scale TDM data could help establish an effective monitoring strategy for these drugs.

The Anti-Epileptic Drugs Lamotrigine and Valproic Acid Reduce the Cardiac Sodium Current

Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death. To establish whether gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, pregabalin, and valproic acid reduce the Na_v1.5 current, we conducted whole-cell patch-clamp studies to study the effects of the five AEDs on currents of human cardiac Na_v1.5 channels stably expressed in HEK293 cells, and on action potential (AP) properties of freshly isolated rabbit ventricular cardiomyocytes. Lamotrigine and valproic acid exhibited inhibitory effects on the Na_v1.5 current in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC₅₀ of 142 ± 36 and 2022 ± 25 µM for lamotrigine and valproic acid, respectively. In addition, these drugs caused a hyperpolarizing shift of steady-state inactivation and a delay in recovery from inactivation. The changes on the Na_v1.5 properties were reflected by a reduction in AP upstroke velocity (43.0 ± 6.8% (lamotrigine) and 23.7 ± 10.6% (valproic acid) at 1 Hz) and AP amplitude; in contrast, AP duration was not changed. Gabapentin, levetiracetam, and pregabalin had no effect on the Na_v1.5 current. Lamotrigine and valproic acid reduce the Na_v1.5 current density and affect its gating properties, resulting in a decrease of the AP upstroke velocity. Gabapentin, levetiracetam, and pregabalin have no effects on the Na_v1.5 current.

Does An ERAS Protocol Reduce Postoperative Opiate Prescribing in Plastic Surgery?

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are effective at reducing inpatient opiate use. There is a paucity of studies on the effects of an ERAS protocol on outpatient opiate prescriptions. The aim of this study was to determine whether an ERAS protocol for plastic and reconstructive surgery would reduce opiate use in the outpatient postoperative setting.

Methods

A statewide (Massachusetts, USA) controlled substance prescription monitoring database was retrospectively reviewed to assess the prescribing patterns of a single academic plastic surgeon performing common plastic surgical outpatient operations. The time period prior to implementation of the ERAS protocol was then compared with the time period following protocol implementation. An additional three months of post-implementation data were then compared with those of each of the previous time periods to investigate whether the results were sustained.

Results

A comparison of opiate prescriptions in pre-ERAS, immediate post-ERAS procedures, and follow-up ERAS implementation procedures revealed a statistically significant decrease in opiate prescriptions after ERAS protocol implementation. This decrease in the quantity of opiates prescribed was sustained over time.

Conclusions

ERAS protocols are effective at reducing outpatient opiate prescriptions after a variety of plastic surgery operations. Appropriate patient and physician education is paramount for success.

Gabapentin controlled substance status

Gabapentin is approved to treat postherpetic neuralgia and epilepsy with partial-onset seizures. The large majority of gabapentin prescribing is off label. Gabapentin may be abused for euphoria, potentiating the high from opiates, reduction of alcohol cravings, a cocaine-like high, as well as sedation or sleep. Individuals at the highest risk for abusing gabapentin include those with opioid abuse, mental illness, or previous history of prescription drug abuse. States are now taking action to track gabapentin use through prescription monitoring programs, and some states have reclassified it as a Schedule V controlled substance. This commentary summarizes gabapentin's abuse potential, identifies state-level actions regarding gabapentin monitoring, and discusses possible clinical implications and ways to enhance patient safety when prescribing gabapentin.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin in various indications

OBJECTIVES

Gabapentin has been increasingly used in various indications in recent years. Despite variable pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is scarcely described in other indications than epilepsy. The aim of the study was to investigate the use and pharmacokinetic variability of gabapentin in epilepsy and non-epilepsy indications and to further evaluate the use of TDM in patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS).

MATERIALS & METHODS

Population-based data from the Norwegian Prescription Database, retrospective TDM data from the section for Clinical Pharmacology, the National Center for Epilepsy, Norway, and prospective observational data on patients with RLS were used.

RESULTS

The use of gabapentin increased by 30% from 2014 to 2017 (32 181 to 42 675 users). TDM data from 120 patients showed a 22-fold pharmacokinetic variability in concentration/dose ratios, and this ratio was elevated in elderly patients (≥65 years). The majority of elderly used gabapentin for non-epilepsy indications. In patients with RLS, intake in the evening/night only was common due to nocturnal symptoms, in contrast to regular dosing regimens in epilepsy. Thus, drug fasting concentrations do not reflect concentrations at the time of required therapeutic effect. TDM was still found useful in most patients to support dosage increase or evaluate adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Due to extensive pharmacokinetic variability, TDM can benefit patients using gabapentin. Challenges with applying TDM in new indications such as RLS include different dosage regimens and consequently different interpretation of serum concentrations. Thus, TDM should be requested on clear clinical grounds and the service tailored according to the therapeutic indication.

Effectiveness of preanesthetic administration of gabapentin on sedative action during intravenous sedation with propofol

PURPOSE

There are no sufficient evidences for the sedative effect of gabapentin during anesthesia, especially intravenous sedation (IVS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sedative effect of gabapentin as preanesthetic medication during the IVS with propofol.

METHODS

10 volunteer subjects joined this study. They underwent propofol IVS three times on separate days. On the first day, the IVS without gabapentin was performed as a control. On the second and the third day, gabapentin 200 mg and 400 mg were administered before the IVS, respectively. The target blood concentration (C_T) of propofol was gradually increased, and the bispectral index (BIS) value and Ramsay sedation score (RSS) were evaluated at each propofol C_T. Postanesthetic complications and influences on vital signs were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the propofol C_Ts in the gabapentin 400 mg group significantly reduced at the BIS values of 60 and 70 (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively), and at RSS 3, 4, 5 and 6 (p = 0.040, p = 0.004, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in propofol C_Ts between the control group and the gabapentin 200 mg group. There were no abnormality and no deterioration in circulation and respiration in all groups. There were no significant increases in complications with the administration of gabapentin.

CONCLUSION

The oral administration of 400 mg dose of gabapentin reduced the propofol C_Ts for achieving an adequate sedation level on IVS.

An Updated Overview on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Recent Antiepileptic Drugs

Given the distinctive characteristics of both epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can make a significant contribution to the field of epilepsy. The measurement and interpretation of serum drug concentrations can be of benefit in the treatment of uncontrollable seizures and in cases of clinical toxicity; it can aid in the individualization of therapy and in adjusting for variable or nonlinear pharmacokinetics; and can be useful in special populations such as pregnancy. This review examines the potential for TDM of newer AEDs such as eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, retigabine, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. We describe the relationships between serum drug concentration, clinical effect, and adverse drug reactions for each AED as well as the different analytical methods used for serum drug quantification. We discuss retrospective studies and prospective data on the serum drug concentration-efficacy of these drugs and present the pharmacokinetic parameters, oral bioavailability, reference concentration range, and active metabolites of newer AEDs. Limited data are available for recent AEDs, and we discuss the connection between drug concentrations in terms of clinical efficacy and nonresponse. Although we do not propose routine TDM, serum drug measurement can play a beneficial role in patient management and treatment individualization. Standardized studies designed to assess, in particular, concentration-efficacy-toxicity relationships for recent AEDs are urgently required.

Factors in Variability of Serial Gabapentin Concentrations in Elderly Patients with Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

To characterize and quantify the variability of serial gabapentin concentrations in elderly patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

This study included 83 patients (age ≥ 60 yrs) from an 18-center randomized double-blind double-dummy parallel study from the Veterans Affairs Cooperative 428 Study. All patients were taking 1500 mg/day gabapentin. Within-person coefficient of variation (CV) in gabapentin concentrations, measured weekly to bimonthly for up to 52 weeks, then quarterly, was computed. Impact of patient characteristics on gabapentin concentrations (linear mixed model) and CV (linear regression) were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 482 gabapentin concentration measurements were available for analysis. Gabapentin concentrations and intrapatient CVs ranged from 0.5 to 22.6 μg/ml (mean 7.9 μg/ml, standard deviation [SD] 4.1 μg/ml) and 2% to 79% (mean 27.9%, SD 15.3%), respectively, across all visits. Intrapatient CV was higher by 7.3% for those with a body mass index of ≥ 30 kg/m² (coefficient = 7.3, p=0.04). CVs were on average 0.5% higher for each 1-unit higher CV in creatinine clearance (coefficient = 0.5, p=0.03) and 1.2% higher for each 1-hour longer mean time after dose (coefficient = 1.2, p=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial intrapatient variability in serial gabapentin concentration was noted in elderly patients with epilepsy. Creatinine clearance, time of sampling relative to dose, and obesity were found to be positively associated with variability.

Pharmacokinetics and Saturable Absorption of Gabapentin in Nursing Home Elderly Patients

Pharmacokinetic data of gabapentin (GBP) in community-dwelling elderly patients show a significant effect of advanced age on GBP pharmacokinetics due to altered renal function. However, there are no data in elderly nursing home (NH) patients to evaluate gabapentin absorption and elimination. Our objective was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of GBP in elderly nursing home patients maintained on GBP therapy. This was a prospective pharmacokinetic study in elderly nursing home patients (≥60 years) receiving GBP for the management of chronic pain or epilepsy from seven nursing homes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. A one-compartment model described the data and clearance (CL) was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p < 0.0001). The GBP CL in elderly nursing home patients was 2.93 L/h. After adjusting for the effect of GFR, GBP CL was not affected by age, sex, body weight, or comorbidity scores. No significant effects of body size measures, age, and sex were detected on volume of distribution. Dose-dependent bioavailability of GBP was demonstrated, and the saturable absorption profile was described by a nonlinear hyperbolic function. Prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pc-VPC) suggests adequate fixed- and random-effects models that successfully simulated the mean trend and variability in gabapentin concentration-time profiles. In this analysis, the parameters of the hyperbolic nonlinearity appear to be similar between elderly and younger adults.

Advances in anti-epileptic drug testing

In the past twenty-one years, 17 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are clobazam, ezogabine (retigabine), eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. Therapeutic drug monitoring is often used in the clinical dosing of the newer anti-epileptic drugs. The drugs with the best justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Perampanel, stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly bound to serum proteins and are candidates for monitoring of the free drug fractions. Alternative specimens for therapeutic drug monitoring are saliva and dried blood spots. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs is discussed here for managing patients with epilepsy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new-generation antiepileptic drugs at the extremes of age: an update

Epilepsies occur across the entire age range, and their incidence peaks in the first years of life and in the elderly. Therefore, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used at the extremes of age. Rational prescribing in these age groups requires not only an understanding of the drugs' pharmacodynamic properties, but also careful consideration of potential age-related changes in their pharmacokinetic profile. The present article, which updates a review published in 2006 in this journal, focuses on recent findings on the pharmacokinetics of new-generation AEDs in neonates, infants, children, and the elderly. Significant new information on the pharmacokinetics of new AEDs in the perinatal period has been acquired, particularly for lamotrigine and levetiracetam. As a result of slow maturation of the enzymes involved in glucuronide conjugation, lamotrigine elimination occurs at a particularly slow rate in neonates, and becomes gradually more efficient during the first months of life. In the case of levetiracetam, elimination occurs primarily by renal excretion and is also slow at birth, but drug clearance increases rapidly thereafter and can even double within 1 week. In general, infants older than 2-3 months and children show higher drug clearance (normalized for body weight) than adults. This pattern was confirmed in recent studies that investigated the pediatric pharmacokinetics of several new AEDs, including levetiracetam, rufinamide, stiripentol, and eslicarbazepine acetate. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, drug clearance is generally reduced compared with younger adults because of less efficient drug-metabolizing activity, decreased renal function, or both. This general pattern, described previously for several AEDs, was confirmed in recent studies on the effect of old age on the clearance of felbamate, levetiracetam, pregabalin, lacosamide, and retigabine. For those drugs which are predominantly eliminated by renal excretion, aging-related pharmacokinetic changes could be predicted by measuring creatinine clearance (CLCR). Overall, most recent findings confirm that age is a major factor influencing the pharmacokinetic profile of AEDs. However, pharmacokinetic variability at any age can be considerable, and the importance of other factors should not be disregarded. These include genetic factors, co-morbidities, and drug interactions, particularly those caused by concomitantly administered AEDs which induce or inhibit drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Host factors affecting antiepileptic drug delivery-pharmacokinetic variability

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay in the treatment of epilepsy, one of the most common serious chronic neurological disorders. AEDs display extensive pharmacological variability between and within patients, and a major determinant of differences in response to treatment is pharmacokinetic variability. Host factors affecting AED delivery may be defined as the pharmacokinetic characteristics that determine the AED delivery to the site of action, the epileptic focus. Individual differences may occur in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. These differences can be determined by genetic factors including gender and ethnicity, but the pharmacokinetics of AEDs can also be affected by age, specific physiological states in life, such as pregnancy, or pathological conditions including hepatic and renal insufficiency. Pharmacokinetic interactions with other drugs are another important source of variability in response to AEDs. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of the presently available AEDs are discussed in this review as well as their clinical implications.

Modern methods for analysis of antiepileptic drugs in the biological fluids for pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring

Epilepsy is a chronic disease occurring in approximately 1.0% of the world's population. About 30% of the epileptic patients treated with availably antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continue to have seizures and are considered therapy-resistant or refractory patients. The ultimate goal for the use of AEDs is complete cessation of seizures without side effects. Because of a narrow therapeutic index of AEDs, a complete understanding of its clinical pharmacokinetics is essential for understanding of the pharmacodynamics of these drugs. These drug concentrations in biological fluids serve as surrogate markers and can be used to guide or target drug dosing. Because early studies demonstrated clinical and/or electroencephalographic correlations with serum concentrations of several AEDs, It has been almost 50 years since clinicians started using plasma concentrations of AEDs to optimize pharmacotherapy in patients with epilepsy. Therefore, validated analytical method for concentrations of AEDs in biological fluids is a necessity in order to explore pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and TDM in various clinical situations. There are hundreds of published articles on the analysis of specific AEDs by a wide variety of analytical methods in biological samples have appears over the past decade. This review intends to provide an updated, concise overview on the modern method development for monitoring AEDs for pharmacokinetic studies, bioequivalence and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of gabapentin]

Gabapentin is a structural analogue of GABA used in the treatment of the partial epilepsies of adult and child of more than 12 years, in monotherapy or in association with other anticonvulsant drugs. In association, gabapentin presents the advantage of not interfering with the other anticonvulsant drugs. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and the saturable absorption are, with the adaptation in case of renal insufficiency, the only arguments in favor of TDM. During clinical studies, the plasma concentrations of gabapentin were generally included between 2 and 20 mg/L. For this molecule, the level of proof of the interest of therapeutic drug monitoring was estimated in: possibly useful.

A probable case of gabapentin-related reversible hearing loss in a patient with acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

As described in the literature, gabapentin toxicity in patients with impaired renal function can manifest as coma, myoclonus, tremulousness, or altered mental status. Gabapentin is an antiepileptic agent indicated for use as an adjunct therapy in partial seizures and postherpetic neuralgia but is also prescribed for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 46-year-old white woman (height, 167 cm; weight, 177 kg; body mass index, 62.8 kg/m2) with a 6-year history of diabetes mellitus and previously normal renal function, presented to the emergency department of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center with anuria (a serum creatinine level of 7.4 mg/dL), hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion with hallucinations lasting for 3 days. Her blood pressure was 110/74 mm Hg. The patient's preadmit medication list included: lisinopril (40 mg QD), hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg QD), and furosemide (80 mg QD) for hypertension; atorvastatin (10 mg QD) for hyperlipidemia; omeprazole (20 mg QD) for gastroesophageal reflux disease; salmeterol/fluticasone inhaler (100/50 microg; 1 puff BID) and albuterol metered-dose inhaler (90 microg as needed) for asthma; metformin (500 mg BID) and insulin lispro per sliding scale for type 2 diabetes mellitus; oxycodone controlled release (60 mg TID) for chronic osteoarthritis and low back pain; alprazolam (0.5 mg every 8 hours as needed) for generalized anxiety disorder; venlafaxine (150 mg BID) for depression; and gabapentin (300 mg TID) for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The patient's symptoms (hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion) improved after 1 session of hemodialysis (approximately 10 hours following admission) and had resolved at the time of discharge (4 days later). On admission, the gabapentin concentration was 17.6 microg/mL, and following hemodialysis, the gabapentin concentration was undetectable (by discharge/day 4). The timing of the patient's last dose of gabapentin is unknown. Normal doses for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy range from 900 to 3600 mg/d divided 3 times daily.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a patient with acute renal failure who developed hearing loss, myoclonus, and confusion with hallucinations in the presence of elevated gabapentin concentrations. Due to rapid improvement after hemodialysis and discontinuation of gabapentin, we believe that these symptoms were probably due to gabapentin toxicity.

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.

Safety and efficacy of anticonvulsants in elderly patients with psychiatric disorders: oxcarbazepine, topiramate and gabapentin

Few controlled studies are available to guide the clinician in treating potentially assaultive elderly individuals with psychiatric disorders. Safety concerns limit the use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotic medications in the elderly individual, making anticonvulsants an attractive alternative. This paper reviews three specific anticonvulsants for this purpose: gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and topiramate, describing safety and efficacy in elderly patients with severe agitation from psychosis or dementia. Gabapentin, renally excreted, with a half-life of 6.5-10.5 h, may cause ataxia. Oxcarbazapine, hepatically reduced, may cause hyponatremia, and topiramate may cause significant cognitive impairment. Nonetheless, these are important medications to consider in the treatment of agitation.

Age‐Related Changes in Pharmacokinetics: Predictability and Assessment Methods

Although there have been relatively few studies of the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in old age, available evidence indicates that the clearance of most old and new generation AEDs is reduced on average by about 20-40% in elderly patients compared with nonelderly adults. Depending on the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug, the reduction in clearance can be ascribed to a physiological reduction in rate of drug metabolism, to a decrease in renal excretion rate, or to both. Studies have consistently demonstrated that interindividual pharmacokinetic variability in old age is particularly prominent, due not only to the influence of aging-related physiological changes, but also to the impact of comorbidities and drug-drug interactions. For extensively metabolized drugs, there are no reliable tools to predict with a high degree of accuracy the pharmacokinetic behavior of an AED in an individual patient. With renally eliminated drugs, determination of creatinine clearance may provide a useful clue in predicting individual changes in drug clearance and the consequent need for dosage adjustment. In the therapeutic setting, measurement of serum AED concentrations can be valuable in individualizing dosage in an elderly person, even though it should be remembered that in the case of drugs that are highly bound to plasma proteins the total serum concentration may underestimate the level of unbound, pharmacologically active drug. Because aging is also associated with important pharmacodynamic changes that may alter the relationship between serum drug concentration and pharmacological effects, pharmacokinetic measurements alone are not a substitute for the need to monitor clinical response carefully and to adjust dosage accordingly.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII)

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.

Pharmacokinetic variability of new antiepileptic drugs at different ages

Newer generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used to treat epilepsies in infants, children, and the elderly. For rational prescribing in these populations, it is essential to understand the pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging. Data obtained in recent years indicate that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, tiagabine, zonisamide, vigabatrin, and felbamate is considerably higher in children than in adults,the magnitude of the difference being on average in the order of 20%to 120%, depending on the drug and the age distribution of the assessed population. Information on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs in newborns is completely lacking or very sparse. Studies in the elderly have demonstrated that significant pharmacokinetic changes also occur at the other extreme of age. On average, CL/F values of newer generation AEDs have been found to be reduced by 10% to 50% compared with those found in young or middle-aged adults. These pharmacokinetic changes are clinically important and con-tribute to age-related differences in dosage requirements.

Application of TDM, pharmacogenomics and biomarkers for neurological disease pharmacotherapy: focus on antiepileptic drugs

Anticonvulsants, or antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), are a vital tool in the therapeutic management of epilepsy patients. However, many AEDs are commonly used in the management of nonepileptic conditions, such as chronic pain, migraine headaches and psychiatric disorders. It is well documented that serum drug levels are an important data tool for the management of patients taking these drugs. As we move toward the personalized optimization of pharmacotherapy, drug level data will not be sufficient. This article will review tools for therapeutic drug management of AEDs including pharmacogenetics and biomarkers, in addition to traditional serum drug levels.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of New-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs at the Extremes of Age

In recent years, several new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in clinical practice. These agents, which include felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide, are being increasingly used in the treatment of epilepsy at the extremes of age. For a rational prescribing of these drugs in specific age groups, major pharmacokinetic changes that occur during development and aging need to be taken into consideration. A review of available evidence indicates that the apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of new-generation AEDs in children is increased by 20-170% (depending on the type of drug and characteristics of the patients studied) compared with adults, with the highest CL/F values usually being observed in the youngest age groups. These findings do not necessarily apply to the first weeks of life, when drug eliminating capacity is still undergoing maturation, as in the case of lamotrigine for which preliminary data suggest that CL/F in neonates aged <2 months can be much lower than in infants aged 2-12 months. At the other extreme of age, in the elderly, CL/F is almost invariably reduced (on average by 10-50%) compared with values found in non-elderly adults. Age-related CL/F changes, together with the large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, contribute to the need for individualised dosage requirements in these patients. Measurement of serum drug concentrations can be useful as an aid to dosage individualization in these age groups but interpretation of therapeutic drug monitoring data should also take into account the possibility of age-related changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity and, for neonates and the elderly, alterations in drug binding to serum proteins.

Management of Focal-Onset Seizures

Focal-onset seizures are manifestations of abnormal epileptic firing of brain cells in a localised area or areas of the brain. The diagnosis of focal-onset seizures initially entails an EEG, a detailed history from the patient and eyewitnesses, as well as computer tomographic or, preferably, magnetic resonance imaging scans. Video EEG to record ictal events may be necessary to establish the correct diagnosis. Focal seizures are classified according to the International Classification of Epileptic Seizures and International Classification of Epilepsies and Epilepsy Syndromes. It is important to try to decide how the seizure event fits into this system in order to successfully evaluate and optimise treatment, as well as to give detailed information to the patient about their seizures and prognosis. Once the decision to treat the seizures has been made, the physician must choose which medication is the most appropriate to begin with. Carbamazepine, phenytoin or valproic acid (sodium valproate) are often rated as first-line drugs, but factors such as adverse-effect profiles, age, possibility of pregnancy, and concomitant diseases and medication also need to be considered. Most of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) appear to have good efficacy and better tolerability than the older agents, but evidence to support their superiority is scarce and has led to conflicting advice in several guidelines. Among the newer AEDs, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate and oxcarbazepine have obtained monotherapy indication in many countries. The higher costs of the newer AEDs may inhibit their wider use, especially in poorer countries.

Can Pharmacokinetic Variability Be Controlled for the Patient??s Benefit?

The aim of this brief communication is to update our recent review on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The potential value of TDM is discussed in relation to their mode of action and their pharmacokinetic proper-ties. Data on the relationships between serum concentrations and clinical efficacy are limited, and few studies have been designed primarily to study these relationships. As yet there are no generally accepted target ranges for any of the new AEDs. For most drugs a wide range in serum concentration is associated with clinical efficacy,and there is a considerable overlap in serum concentrations related to toxicity and lack of clinical efficacy. Although the available documentation is clearly insufficient, the pharmacological properties of some of the drugs suggest that they may be suitable candidates for TDM. The primary role of TDM for both the newer and established AEDs is to identify an individual's optimum concentration and thus establish a reference value in that patient.