The effect of kidney size on cadaveric renal allograft outcome

Glomerular hyperfiltration

Circulating blood is filtered across the glomerular barrier to form an ultrafiltrate of plasma in the Bowman's space. The volume of glomerular filtration adjusted by time is defined as the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and the total GFR is the sum of all single-nephron GFRs. Thus, when the single-nephron GFR is increased in the context of a normal number of functioning nephrons, single glomerular hyperfiltration results in 'absolute' hyperfiltration in the kidney. 'Absolute' hyperfiltration can occur in healthy people after high protein intake, during pregnancy and in patients with diabetes, obesity or autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease. When the number of functioning nephrons is reduced, single-nephron glomerular hyperfiltration can result in a GFR that is within or below the normal range. This 'relative' hyperfiltration can occur in patients with a congenitally reduced nephron number or with an acquired reduction in nephron mass consequent to surgery or kidney disease. Improved understanding of the mechanisms that underlie 'absolute' and 'relative' glomerular hyperfiltration in different clinical settings, and of whether and how the single-nephron haemodynamic and related biomechanical forces that underlie glomerular hyperfiltration promote glomerular injury, will pave the way toward the development of novel therapeutic interventions that attenuate glomerular hyperfiltration and potentially prevent or limit consequent progressive kidney injury and loss of function.

Impact of acute kidney injury on graft outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplantation: A nationwide registry-based matched cohort study in Korea

BACKGROUND

Favorable long-term and short-term graft survival and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT) from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have been reported. However, few studies have evaluated effects of donor AKI status on graft outcomes after KT in Asian population. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate graft function after KTs from donors with AKI compared to matched KTs from donors without AKI using a multicenter cohort in Korea.

METHODS

We analyzed a total of 1,466 KTs collected in Korean Organ Transplant Registry between April 2014 and December 2017. KTs from AKI donors (defined as donors with serum creatinine level ≥ 2 mg/dL) and non-AKI donors (275 cases for each group) were enrolled using a 1:1 propensity score matching. Graft outcomes including graft and patient survival, delayed graft function (DGF), rejection rate, and serially measured estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, KTs from AKI donors showed higher rate of DGF (44.7% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001). However, the rejection rate was not significantly different between the two groups (KTs from AKI donors vs. KTs from non-AKI donors). eGFRs measured after 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years were not significantly different by donor AKI status. With median follow-up duration of 3.52 years, cox proportional hazards models revealed hazard ratio of 0.973 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.584 to 1.621), 1.004 (95% CI, 0.491 to 2.054) and 0.808 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.426 to 1.532) for overall graft failure, death-censored graft failure and patient mortality, respectively, in KTs from AKI donors compared to KTs from non-AKI donors as a reference.

CONCLUSIONS

KTs from AKI donors showed comparable outcomes to KTs from non-AKI donors, despite a higher incidence of DGF. Results of this study supports the validity of using kidneys from deceased AKI donors in Asian population.

Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The role of kidney volume measurement in predicting the donor and recipient kidney function is not clear.

METHODS

We measured kidney volume bilaterally in living kidney donors using CT angiography and assessed the association with the donor remaining kidney and recipient kidney (donated kidney) function at 1 year after kidney transplantation. Donor volume was categorized into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume.

RESULTS

There were 166 living donor and recipient pairs. The mean donor age was 44.8 years (SD ± 10.8), and donor mean BMI was 25.5 (SD ± 2.9). The recipients of living donor kidneys were 64% male and had a mean age of 43.5 years (SD ± 13.3). Six percent of patients experienced an episode of cellular rejection and were maintained on dialysis for a mean of 18 months (13-32) prior to transplant. Kidney volume was divided into tertiles based on lowest, middle, and highest volume. Kidney volume median (range) in tertiles 1, 2, and 3 was 124 (89-135 ml), 155 (136-164 ml), and 184 (165-240 ml) with donor eGFR ml/min (adjusted for body surface area expressed as ml/min/1.73 m2) at the time of donation in each tertile, 109 (93-129), 110 (92-132), and 101 ml/min (84-117). The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in kidney recipients at 1 year after donation was 54 (44-67), 62 (50-75), and 63 ml/min (58-79), respectively. The median (IQR) eGFR in tertiles 1 to 3 in the remaining kidney of donors at 1 year after donation was 59 (53-66), 65 (57-72), and 65 ml/min (56-73), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Bigger kidney volume was associated with better eGFR at 1 year after transplant in the recipient and marginally in the donor remaining kidney.

Donor Age, Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch, and Kidney Graft Survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Small donor and/or kidney sizes relative to recipient size are associated with a higher risk of kidney allograft failure. Donor and recipient ages are associated with graft survival and may modulate the relationship between size mismatch and the latter. The aim of this study was to determine whether the association between donor-recipient size mismatch and graft survival differs by donor and recipient age.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENT

We performed a retrospective cohort study of first adult deceased donor kidney transplantations performed between 2000 and 2018 recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between donor-recipient body surface area ratio and death-censored graft survival, defined as return to dialysis or retransplantation. We considered interactions between donor-recipient body surface area ratio and each of recipient and donor age.

RESULTS

Among the 136,321 kidney transplant recipients included in this study, 23,614 (17%) experienced death-censored graft loss over a median follow-up of 4.3 years (interquartile range, 1.9-7.8 years). The three-way donor-recipient body surface area ratio by donor age by recipient age interaction was statistically significant (P=0.04). The magnitude of the association between severe size mismatch (donor-recipient body surface area ratio <0.80 versus ≥1.00) and death-censored graft survival was stronger with older donor age and recipient age. In all recipient age categories except the youngest (18-30 years), 5- and 10-year graft survival rates were similar or better with a size-mismatched donor aged <40 years than a nonsize-mismatched donor aged 40 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of donor-recipient size mismatch on long-term graft survival is modulated by recipient and donor age. Size-mismatched kidneys yield excellent graft survival when the donor is young. Donor age was more strongly associated with graft survival than size mismatch.

Small donor size does not negatively impact outcomes after deceased-donor renal transplantation

Higher body mass index (BMI) of deceased-donors is associated with poorer outcomes in transplant recipients. The effect of low donor BMI on recipient graft function is not clear. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data on recipients of deceased-donor kidneys from 2000 to 2019 were categorized by donor BMI (donor BMI < 18, 18-27, and >27). Primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. The impact of multiple recipient and donor variables, including low donor BMI and the difference between donor and recipient BMI, was evaluated using a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model. Low BMI donors (LBD) were more likely to be younger, female, and white (all P < .05). LBD were less likely to be Hispanic, diabetic, or have hypertension (all P < .001). LBD recipients were more likely to be younger and female (both P < .001). Low donor BMI was not significantly associated with recipient graft survival. Donor-recipient BMI difference did not correlate with an increased risk of graft failure. Similar results were obtained when donors were classified using body surface area (BSA). Small donor size in terms of BMI or BSA or a large discrepancy between donor and recipient size should not necessarily preclude transplantation of an otherwise acceptable kidney.

Impact of adjusted kidney volume measured in the bench surgery on one-year renal function in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice in patient with end stage chronic kidney disease, offering the best long term survival and greater Quality of Life in this group of patients. Graft volume was correlated with improved renal function in living donor transplantations. The primary aim of this study was to correlate renal volume adjusted to body surface area with renal function one year (estimated glomerular filtration rate; eGFR) after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective cohort study included 256 patients who underwent kidney transplantation from January 2011 through December 2015 at Hospital das Clínicas de Botucatu-UNESP. We evaluated three kidney measurements during the bench surgery; the final graft volume was calculated using the ellipsoid formula and adjusted to body surface area.

RESULTS

In the living donors there was positive correlation between adjusted graft volume and eGFR (r = 0.311, p = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that low rejection rate and increased adjusted graft volume were independent factors correlated with eGFR. In deceased donors, there was no correlation between adjusted kidney volume and eGFR (r = 0.08, p = 0.279) in univariate analysis, but a multivariate analysis indicated that lower kidney donor profile index (KDPI), absence of rejection and high adjusted kidney volume were independent factors for better eGFR.

CONCLUSION

Adjusted kidney volume was positively correlated with a satisfactory eGFR at one year after living donor and deceased donor transplantations.

Prediction model of compensation for contralateral kidney after living-donor donation

Background

Compensation of contralateral kidney function after living-donor kidney donation is well known, and many predictive factors have been proposed. However, no prediction model has been proposed. This study was performed to establish a tool with which to estimate the degree of compensation of the contralateral kidney after living-donor kidney donation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 133 living donors for renal transplantation in our institution. We defined a favorable compensation as a post-donation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year (calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) of > 60% of the pre-donation eGFR. We analyzed the living donors’ clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Results

The median (range) donor age was 59 (24–79) years, median (range) body mass index was 22.9 (16.8–32.7) kg/m², and median (range) body surface area was 1.6 (1.3–2.0) m². All donors were Japanese, and 73% of the donors were biologically related. The median (range) donor pre-donation eGFR was 108.7 (82–144) ml/min/1.73 m², and the median (range) post-donation eGFR at 1 year was 86.9 (43–143) ml/min/1.73 m². Eighty-six percent of donors had compensatory hypertrophy. In the univariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, body surface area, and pre-donation eGFR were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis, age, female sex, history of hypertension, and ratio of the remnant kidney volume to body weight were significantly associated with hypertrophy (p < 0.05). Based on these results, we created a compensation prediction score (CPS). The median (range) CPS was 8.7 (1.1–17.4). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed strong diagnostic accuracy for predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve, 0.958; 95% confidence interval, 0.925–0.991, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of the CPS was 5.0 (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 89.5%). The CPS had a strong positive correlation with the post-donation eGFR (R = 0.797, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The CPS might be useful tool with which to predict a favorable compensation of the contralateral kidney and remnant kidney function. If the CPS is low, careful management and follow-up might be necessary. Further investigations are needed to validate these findings in larger populations.

The impact of donor and recipient weight incompatibility on renal transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Donor/recipient size mismatching and correlation to allograft outcome remains poorly defined. This study assessed the impact of donor body weight (DBW) to recipient body weight (RBW) ratio on allograft function and survival.

METHODS

A total of 898 deceased donor renal transplant recipients were included in the study. Patients were divided into quartiles depending on the ratio of DBW/RBW: Q1 (≤ 0.88), Q2 (0.89-1.00), Q3 (1.01-1.22) and Q4 (> 1.22). Donor and recipient characteristics were obtained from the national kidney transplant service database. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 and 5 years after transplant were compared.

RESULTS

Q4 patients had a higher eGFR 1 year post-transplant (median 59.5 ml/min, IQR 46.8-76.2) compared to Q1-Q3 which had median eGFRs of 54.3, 54.8 and 55.3 ml/min, respectively (p < 0.001). At 5 years post-transplant, there were modest differences in the eGFR across the four quartiles, Q1-4 with median eGFRs of 56.9, 61.1, 61.2 and 58.6 ml/min, respectively (p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences in 1- and 5-year allograft survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of deceased donor renal transplantation, mismatching of donor to recipient weight had no impact on 5-year allograft survival, but a low DBW/RBW ratio is modestly associated with lower eGFR.

Decrease in 1-year Kidney Graft Size Predicts Inferior Outcomes After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Longest bipolar length of the kidney graft is routinely measured for ultrasonographic assessment of graft size (GS), although the value of the graft length remains unclear.

METHODS

In a single-center, observational study involving 319 deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, we assessed variations in absolute and adjusted GS (corrected for body surface area) between 1 and 12 months after transplantation ([INCREMENT]GS1m→12m). We tested whether variations in GS during the first year were predictive of the composite outcome of a reduction of 50% or more in the estimated glomerular filtration rate or end-stage graft failure.

RESULTS

At 1 year after transplantation, 121 patients (38%) had a decrease in GS ([INCREMENT]GS1m→12m <0), and 198 patients (62%) had an increase in GS ([INCREMENT]GS1m→12m ≥0). After a median follow-up of 53 months, 41 patients with a decrease in GS reached the composite outcome as compared with 12 patients with an increase in GS (34% and 6%, respectively; P < 0.001). Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves of absolute and adjusted [INCREMENT]GS1m→12m for composite outcome were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-0.88) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70-0.86), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk of the composite outcome was significantly higher among patients with a decrease in GS during the first year after transplantation (hazard ratio, 4.55; 95% CI, 2.35-8.81; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in kidney GS during the first year after transplantation, as compared with an increase in GS, is a powerful predictor of subsequent graft dysfunction or end-stage graft failure.

Impact of remaining kidney volume to body weight ratio on renal function in living kidney donors

To investigate whether the ratio of remnant kidney volume to body weight (V/W ratio) can impact renal function in donors, 45 living kidney donors were enrolled. Kidney volume was analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging. Renal function was compared between donors with a V/W ratio of < 2.0 mL/kg (n = 23) or ≥ 2.0 mL/kg (n = 22). Donors in both V/W groups showed similar serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at 7 days and 1 year, whereas donors with a V/W ratio of < 2.0 mL/kg had significantly higher 24-hour urine protein levels at 1 year (0.54 ± 0.23 g/d vs. 0.33 ± 0.19 g/d, p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis revealed no correlation between the V/W ratio and eGFR at 7 days or 1 year, and a V/W ratio of < 2 mL/kg was not associated with an increased incidence of eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year (risk ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 0.10-29.47). The V/W ratio correlated inversely with 24-hour urine protein (r = -0.377, p = 0.021) at 1 year, and donors with a V/W ratio of < 2.0 mL/kg were more likely to show 24-hour urine protein >300 mg (risk ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.67) at 1 year. Donors with lower V/W ratios have higher 24-hour urinary protein levels at 1 year after transplantation. These findings suggest that the V/W ratio may be useful for kidney selection.

Does allograft size really matter in the long-term outcome of living donor kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Increased allograft mass in living donor kidney transplantation has been recognized as a predictor factor of better short-term allograft function. We evaluated whether donor kidney volume adjusted for recipient body weight is associated with long-term allograft function in living donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We analyzed 67 living donors and their recipients who underwent transplantation between 2003 and 2007. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum creatinine levels at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-transplantation were recorded for all recipients. Transplanted kidney volumes were measured using 3-D helical computed tomography scanning. A transplant kidney volume-recipient body weight (Vol/Wt) ratio was calculated for each donor-recipient pair. The subjects were divided into tertiles according to Vol/Wt ratios: low (<2.16), medium (2.16-2.88), and high (>2.88).

RESULTS

Vol/Wt ratio significantly correlated with recipient eGFR and serum creatinine levels at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years post-transplantation (r = .48, P < .0001; r = .46, P < .0001; r = .47, P < .0001; r = .26, P = .037, respectively, for eGFR; r = -.53, P < .0001; r = -.50, P < .0001; r = -.44, P < .0001; r = -.37, P = .003, respectively, for serum creatinine) but not at 5 years (r = .12, P = .406 for eGFR; r = -.21, P = .110 for serum creatinine). Whereas recipient eGFR increased significantly in a graded fashion among low to high Vol/Wt ratio groups during 1 to 3 years post-transplantation, there was no difference in eGFR values between Vol/Wt ratio groups at 4 and 5 years (P = .21 and .71, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Vol/Wt ratio is not associated with long-term allograft function in living donor kidney transplantation.

ECD kidney transplantation outcomes are improved when matching donors to recipients using a novel creatinine clearance match ratio (CCMR)

Improved outcomes have been associated with various methods of size matching between expanded criteria (ECD) donors and recipients. A novel method for improved functional based matching was developed utilizing manipulation of Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearances for donor and recipient. We hypothesized that optimal clearance-based matches would have superior outcomes for both immediate graft function and long-term graft survival. For the analysis, recipients of ECD kidneys in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) transplanted between October 1, 1987 and August 31, 2011 were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses predicted the hazard ratio of graft failure and the odds ratio of requiring dialysis within the first week. A total of 25,640 ECD kidney transplants were analyzed. On multivariate analysis, higher creatinine clearance match ratio (CCMR) was associated with increased graft failure and odds of requiring dialysis within the first week (comparing highest ratio quintile versus lowest ratio quintile: HR 1.43, p < 0.001; OR 2.08, p < 0.001). This study suggests that ECD kidneys have improved outcomes when the recipient/donor CCMR is optimized.

Preoperative assessment of the deceased-donor kidney: from macroscopic appearance to molecular biomarkers

Variation in deceased-donor kidney quality can significantly affect outcomes after kidney transplantation. Suboptimal organ selection for a given recipient can result in primary nonfunction, premature graft failure, or inappropriate discard of a suitable organ. Appraisal and appropriate selection of deceased-donor kidneys for use in transplantation is therefore critical. A number of predictive tools have been developed to assist the transplant team in evaluating the suitability of a deceased-donor kidney for transplantation to a given recipient. These include stratification of donors into "standard-" or "expanded-criteria" categories based on clinical parameters, pre-implantation biopsy scores, donor risk scores, machine perfusion characteristics, functional kidney weight, donor biomarkers and molecular diagnostic tools, ex vivo viability assessment using postmortem normothermic perfusion, and overall macroscopic appraisal by the surgical team. Consensus as to the role and predictive value of each of these tools is lacking and clinical practice regarding evaluation and selection of kidneys varies considerably.In this review, we seek to critically appraise the literature and evaluate the levels of evidence for tools used to assess deceased-donor kidneys. Although a plethora of appraisal tools exist, very few demonstrate desirable predictive power to be useful in clinical decision-making. Further research using large, well-designed prospective studies is urgently needed to advance this important field of transplantation science.

Clinical implications for graft function of a new equation model for the ratio of living donor kidney volume to recipient body surface area

Purpose

We propose an equation that predicts graft function after kidney transplantation by using donated kidney volume and recipient body surface area (BSA).

Materials and Methods

Included were 261 cases of living kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2009. Preoperative computed tomography scans were performed and the donated kidney volume was measured by use of a three-dimensional reconstruction program (Ripidia). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by using the modification of diet in renal disease formula. Donated kidney volume, preoperative renal function, and demographic factors of both donors and recipients were evaluated as predictors.

Results

The mean ages of the donors and recipients were 40.8 and 41.6 years, respectively. The mean donated kidney volume and donated kidney volume/recipient BSA ratio were 153.4 mL and 96.9 mL/m², respectively. Mean preoperative and postoperative 12-month eGFR of recipients were 7.1 and 59.7 mL/min, respectively, and the mean preoperative eGFR of donors was 92.2 mL/min. Donated kidney volume/recipient BSA ratio, donor age, and recipient gender were the significant predictors of eGFR level (p<0.001) and eGFR<45 mL/min at postoperative 12 months (p=0.005, p<0.001, and p=0.006). From the multiple linear regression equation and predicted probability from logistic regression, we could calculate the equation for the ratio of living donor kidney volume to recipient BSA on graft function.

Conclusions

Graft kidney volume/recipient BSA ratio, donor age, and recipient gender were predictors of graft function 12 months after kidney transplantation. Although we are concerned only with the preoperative, this equation model could help physicians to counsel patients concerning their postoperative prognosis and to avoid insufficient volume donations.

Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of early changes in kidney graft size and resistive index and their predictive role on 1-year graft function

INTRODUCTION

Doppler ultrasonography is a simple, noninvasive diagnostic tool for assessment and follow-up studies in renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between early changes in graft size and resistive index (RI) and 1-year graft function.

METHOD

We recorded graft size, RI, and serum creatinine level in 25 living kidney donors (before transplantation) as well as early (1-week), and 1-year after transplantation (in kidney recipients). Then we assessed the correlation between early changes in graft size and RI and 1-year Scr.

RESULTS

Repeated measurement tests showed a significant increase in graft size including length (initial, 107.6 ± 5.8 mm; average increase, 8.48 ± 5.61 mm; P < 0.001), anterior-posterior diameter (initial, 46.3 ± 4.7 mm; average increase, 6.16 ± 4.08 mm; P < 0.001), and parenchymal thickness (initial, 14.96 ± 2.1 mm; average increase, 3.04 ± 1.98 mm; P < 0.001) 1 week after transplantation. However, during the 1-year follow-up examinations the increase in graft size was not significant in contrast with 1-week follow-up values (P > 0.47). Pearson correlations showed significant correlation between early changes in graft size (eg, anterior-posterior diameter, r = -0.492; P = 0.013); and 1-year Scr levels. There was no significant correlation between graft size changes and RI or RI and Scr early or 1-year after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant increase in kidney size (including length, anterior-posterior diameter, and cortical thickness) early after transplantation. The amount of increase in size significantly correlated with Scr level 1-year after transplantation. There was no correlation between RI and Scr.

The role of obesity in kidney transplantation outcome

BACKGROUND

The number of obese kidney transplant candidates has been growing. However, there are conflicting results regarding to the effect of obesity on kidney transplantation outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the body mass index (BMI) and graft survival by using continuous versus categoric BMI values as an independent risk factor in renal transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 376 kidney transplant recipients to evaluate graft and patient survivals between normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients at the time of transplantation, considering BMI as a categoric variable.

RESULTS

Obese patients were more likely to be male and older than normal-weight recipients (P = .021; P = .002; respectively). Graft loss was significantly higher among obese compared with nonobese recipients. Obese patients displayed significantly lower survival compared with nonobese subjects at 1 year (76.9% vs 35.3%; P = .024) and 3 years (46.2% vs 11.8%; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity may represent an independent risk factor for graft loss and patient death. Careful patient selection with pretransplantation weight reduction is mandatory to reduce the rate of early posttransplantation complications and to improve long-term outcomes.

Early kidney graft size and Doppler parameters are associated with kidney graft function 1 year after transplantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the association of various ultrasonography (US) and Doppler parameters of kidney graft as measured at 1 month posttransplant with 1-year graft function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study cohort included 125 adult recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantations between January 2006 and February 2009. All patients underwent an US-Doppler examination performed by a trained nephrologist at 1 month posttransplant using an Acuson-Siemens Sequoia 512. Graft length and intrarenal Doppler indices were measured at the midsegmental artery level. Relative graft size was calculated by dividing graft length with body mass index. Graft function was assessed at 1 year by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Real Disease study equation. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between US-Doppler parameters and eGFR.

RESULTS

Univariate linear regression showed a significant correlation between eGFR at 1 year and graft length at 1 month (P = .009), relative graft length <0.50 cm per kg/m(2) (P = .004), resistance index >0.75 (P = .031), and end-diastolic velocity <9 cm/sec (P = .006). Logistic regression analyses showed that eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 1 year was significantly associated with graft length <12 cm at 1 month (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-4.92; P = .017), relative graft length <0.5 cm per kg/m(2) (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.20-5.35; P = .014), resistance index >0.75 (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.30-6.29; P = .009), and end-diastolic velocity <9 cm/sec (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.01-5.56; P = .047).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective analysis, kidney transplant recipients with greater graft length at 1 month, specifically when standardized to body size, showed better graft function at 1 year posttransplantation. Higher intrarenal diastolic blood flow and lower resistance index at 1 month were also predictive of better graft function at 1 year.

Graft volume as the surrogate marker for nephron number affects the outcomes of living-donor kidney transplantation

Post-transplant outcome of kidney allografts depends on various factors, one of which may be the compatibility in volume between graft and recipient. However, previous studies adjusted the graft volume only for recipient's size. As the adjusted graft volume for donor's size would be substituted of nephron number more accurately, we adjusted the graft volume for both recipient's and donor's sizes. In 351 cases of living-donor kidney transplantation, we found that the adjusted graft volume for both recipient's and donor's body surface areas (BSAs) yielded larger area under the curves for the transplant outcomes than looking only at the adjusted volume for the recipient's BSA. The recipients were separated into two groups according to the low and high adjusted graft volumes. During the follow-up period (mean 55.6 months), the low-graft-volume group conferred greater risk of rejection, chronic change, glomerulonephritis, and graft loss than the high-graft-volume group (all p's < 0.05). However, the frequency of T-cell infiltration, as evaluated in protocol biopsy, was not different between the two adjusted graft volume groups. In conclusion, the graft volume as the surrogate marker for nephron number should be considered in kidney transplantation, especially in otherwise similar donor conditions.

Size does matter: donor renal volume predicts recipient function following live donor renal transplantation

PURPOSE

With the now routine use of computerized tomography angiography with 3-dimensional reconstruction in the donor evaluation, renal volume can be easily determined using volume calculating software. We evaluated whether donor renal volume could predict recipient renal function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of all donor and recipient pairs undergoing live donor kidney transplantation at our institution between January 2006 and October 2009 were reviewed. The volume of the kidney selected for transplant was determined using volume calculating software, and correlated to transplant recipient nadir and 1-year serum creatinine. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to adjust for demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

During the study period 114 patients underwent live donor renal transplantation. Recipient nadir and 1-year serum creatinine levels were significantly correlated with the volume of donated kidney even after adjusting for age, body mass index, body surface area and donor creatinine clearance. Kidney volume also retained significance after excluding recipients from analysis who experienced acute rejection episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger kidney volumes calculated using 3-dimensional computerized tomography with volume calculating software are correlated with lower recipient nadir and 1-year serum creatinine levels.

Long-term impact of donor-recipient size mismatching in deceased donor kidney transplantation and in expanded criteria donor recipients

BACKGROUND

The degree to which recipient/donor (R/D) size mismatching leads to nephron underdosing and worse kidney allograft survival remains poorly defined, particularly in the setting of preexisting nephron loss such as the expanded criteria donor (ECD).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 69,737 deceased donor transplants followed by a subset analysis of ECD transplants using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1992 to 2005. Ratios of R/D body surface area (BSA) were used to estimate nephron disparity and segregate pairs.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, severe BSA disparity (R/D BSA>1.38 m) was associated with slightly worse 10-year unadjusted graft survival (35% for severe BSA disparity vs. 39% in pairs of comparable size, P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, BSA disparity was associated with a 15% increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio 1.15, P<0.0001). Within ECD cohorts, severe BSA disparity was associated with a decrease in 10-year unadjusted graft survival of greater magnitude than the overall cohort (10% for severe BSA disparity vs. 22% in pairs of comparable size, P<0.0004). On multivariate analysis, severe R/D BSA disparity was associated with worse allograft survival similar to the entire cohort (hazard ratio 1.18, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients receiving kidneys from substantially smaller donors have a statistically higher rate of graft loss that is more pronounced in ECD kidneys. Although severe R/D size disparity is an independent risk factor for graft loss, the magnitude of this risk requires consideration in the context of other risk factors for the graft loss and the hazards of dialysis.

Kidney and recipient weight incompatibility reduces long-term graft survival

Long-term function of kidney allografts depends on multiple variables, one of which may be the compatibility in size between the graft and the recipient. Here, we assessed the long-term consequences of the ratio of the weight of the kidney to the weight of the recipient (KwRw ratio) in a multicenter cohort of 1189 patients who received a transplant between 1995 and 2006. The graft filtration rate increased by a mean of 5.74 ml/min between the third and sixth posttransplantation months among patients with a low KwRw ratio (<2.3 g/kg; P<0.0001). In this low KwRw ratio group, the graft filtration rate remained stable between 6 months and 7 years but then decreased at a mean rate of 3.17 ml/min per yr (P<0.0001). In addition, low KwRw ratios conferred greater risk for proteinuria, more antihypertensive drugs, and segmental or global glomerulosclerosis. Moreover, a KwRw ratio<2.3 g/kg associated with a 55% increased risk for transplant failure by 2 years of follow-up. In conclusion, incompatibility between graft and recipient weight is an independent predictor of long-term graft survival, suggesting that avoiding kidney and recipient weight incompatibility may improve late clinical outcome after kidney transplantation.

The effect of donor/recipient body surface area ratio on outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation

In pediatric kidney transplantation, the effect of inadequate nephron dosing on graft survival remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the use of D/R BSA, as a reliable indicator of adequate nephron dosing, and eventually a tool to optimize pediatric graft allocation. Following Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed deceased donor pediatric kidney transplantation (N = 156). We divided patients into three groups, based on D/R BSA: A < or =0.8; B 0.81-1.19; C > or =1.2. Five-yr graft survival rates in the groups were: A 82.0%; B 94.9%; C 97.1% (p = 0.01). Group C had the lowest rate of acute rejection, suggesting a protective effect of increased D/R BSA (group A = 35.7%, group B = 38.9%, group C = 18.8%; p = 0.029). The logistic regression analysis showed that decreased D/R BSA ratio is a risk factor for loss of graft function, at one and five yr [i.e., group A OR 6 (95% CI 1.14-39.30, p = 0.015) and OR 4.49 (95% CI 1.46-13.79, p = 0.009), respectively]. We conclude that for pediatric recipients, D/R BSA is a valuable adjunct when determining long-term graft survival. Its utility may avoid an alloimmune-independent risk factor, increasing the long-term protective value of a good matching policy.

Donor kidney volume and outcomes following live donor kidney transplantation

Pre-donation kidney volume and function may be crucial factors in determining graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. We measured living donor kidney volumes by 3D helical computed tomography scanning and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by (125)I-iothalamate clearances in 119 donors, and correlated these values with graft function and incidence of acute rejection at 2 years post-transplantation. Kidney volume strongly correlated with GFR (Pearson r= 0.71, p < 0.001). Body size and male gender were independent correlates of larger kidney volumes, and body size and age were predictors of kidney function. The effects of transplanted kidney volume on graft outcome were studied in 104 donor-recipient pairs. A transplanted kidney volume greater than 120 cc/1.73 m(2) was independently associated with better estimated GFR at 2 years post-transplant when compared to recipients of lower transplanted kidney volumes (64 +/- 19 vs. 48 +/- 14 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p < 0.001). Moreover, recipients of lower volumes had a higher incidence of acute cellular rejection (16% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.046). In conclusion, kidney volume strongly correlates with function in living kidney donors and is an independent determinant of post-transplant graft outcome. The findings suggest that (1) transplantation of larger kidneys confers an outcome advantage and (2) larger kidneys should be preferred when selecting from otherwise similar living donors.

Gender-related differences of renal mass supply and metabolic demand after living donor kidney transplantation

Kidney donation from female donors to male recipients has been reported to be associated with decreased allograft survival. Whether there was a gender-related inadequacy between donor nephron supply and recipient functional demand was investigated in this study. One hundred ninety-five living donor kidney transplant recipients that had neither ischemic injury, episode of rejection, nor any complication were included. Weights and heights of both donors and recipients were recorded to calculate body surface area, lean body weight, and body mass index. The donated kidney was weighed just after cold flush, and the recipient's serum creatinine (Scr) was measured on a daily basis post-operatively. When the recipient's Scr reached the baseline, a 24-h urine was collected for the amount of proteinuria (Upr), creatinine excretion (Ucr) and creatinine clearance (Ccr) calculation. The effect of donor and recipient gender was analysed by independent sample t-test. On average, male donors and recipients were heavier and taller than females. However, the mass of kidneys donated from men and women were not statistically different. The gender-related differences in post-transplant Scr and Ucr of recipients were associated with the differences in the parameters of metabolic demands of recipients rather than with the weight of implanted kidney (renal mass supply) or with pre-operative renal functions of donors (functional supply). The early graft function is not determined by donor gender. The effect of recipient gender on the graft function depends on the metabolic demands, which are higher in male recipients.

Impact of obesity on renal transplant outcomes

Obesity is a frequent and important consideration to be taken into account when assessing patient suitability for renal transplantation. In addition, posttransplant obesity continues to represent a significant challenge to health care professionals caring for renal transplant recipients. Despite the vast amount of evidence that exists on the effect of pretransplant obesity on renal transplant outcomes, there are still conflicting views regarding whether obese renal transplant recipients have a worse outcome, in terms of short- and long-term graft survival and patient survival, compared with their non-obese counterparts. It is well established that any association of obesity with reduced patient survival in renal transplant recipients is mediated in part by its clustering with traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and posttransplant diabetes mellitus, but what is not understood is what mediates the association of obesity with graft failure. Whether it is the higher incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities jeopardising the graft or factors specific to obesity, such as hyperfiltration and glomerulopathy, that might be implicated, currently remains unknown. It can be concluded, however, that pre- and posttransplant obesity should be targeted as aggressively as the more well-established cardiovascular risk factors in order to optimize long-term renal transplant outcomes.

Metabolic demand and renal mass supply affecting the early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft mass has been demonstrated to be a determinant of outcome after kidney transplantation. An insufficient nephron might fail to meet the metabolic demands of the recipient and lead to hyperfiltration.

METHODS

The study population was restricted to live donor transplants demonstrating immediate function that had neither ischemic injury, episodes of rejection, nor any complications that resulted in a functional decrease of the graft. The donated kidney was weighed just after cold flush, and the recipient's serum creatinine (Scr) was measured on a daily basis postoperatively. When the recipient's Scr reached the baseline, the recipient's 24-hour urine was collected for the amount of proteinuria (Upr), creatinine excretion (Ucr), and creatinine clearance (Ccr) calculation. As the parameters of the metabolic demands of donor and recipient, body weight, height, body surface area, lean body weight, and body mass index were noted. Pearson correlation and linear regression were carried out.

RESULTS

The graft function, as measured by Scr, Ucr, and Upr, was not directly correlated with the graft weight but rather correlated with the ratios of graft weight to the parameters of recipient's metabolic demands. As recipient size increased, the metabolic demand has increased. The parameters of recipient's metabolic demands were directly correlated with Scr and Ucr, rather than with Upr.

CONCLUSION

During living donor and recipient matching, both the potential sizes of the donated kidney and the recipient should be considered in terms of the early graft function after transplantation.

Impact of Graft Mass on the Clinical Outcome of Kidney Transplants

The effect of nephronic mass reduction of kidney transplants has not been analyzed specifically in a large cohort. Transplant injuries in cadaver kidney graft may have led to an underestimation of the magnitude of this factor. The aim of this study was to analyze the consequences of kidney mass reduction on transplantation outcome. The weights of 1142 kidney grafts were collected prospectively immediately before grafting. Donors and recipients <15 yr of age, simultaneous kidney/pancreas grafts, and technical failures before day 7 were excluded from the analysis. The analysis was performed on Cockroft-calculated creatinine clearance and proteinuria in 964 patients for whom all of the necessary information was available. This study reports that the smallest kidneys transplanted into the largest recipients (donor kidney weight/recipient body weight [DKW/RBW] <2 g/kg, n = 88) increased their clearance by 2.38 ml/min every month for 6 mo (P < 0.0001) and by 0.27 ml/min thereafter (P < 0.0001). Conversely, creatinine clearance did not change for the largest kidneys transplanted into the smallest recipients (DKW/RBW ratios >/=4 g/kg). Next, using a Cox model analysis, it was shown that the risk of having a proteinuria >0.5 g/kg was significantly increased for the low DKW/RBW ratios <2 g/kg with 50% of patients having a proteinuria, compared with DKW/RBW ratios >/=4 g/kg (P < 0.001). In cadaver transplant recipients, graft mass has a rapid impact on graft filtration rate and proteinuria. Avoiding major kidney/recipient inadequacy should have a significant influence on long-term transplant function.

Initial angiogenic response in reduced renal mass after transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Shortage of organs is a major problem in kidney transplantation and requires novel strategies to increase the number of kidney transplants. To reduce the shortage of kidneys, we have proposed transplantation of two halves of one kidney into two recipients (hemirenal transplantation, HRT) and have shown its feasibility in pig and human kidneys. However, reduced renal mass can lead to progressive renal failure in rodents and can reduce the longevity of kidney transplants in humans. Recent studies suggest that derangement of angiogenesis plays a role in the progressive renal failure after reduction in renal mass in rodents. However, since the renal physiology of rats is different from that of large animals, we studied angiogenesis in reduced renal mass transplants in pigs and determined if the reduction in renal mass has the same effect in large animals as that in rodents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kidney autotransplantation was performed in domestic outbred swine. Heminephrectomy of the autotransplanted kidney and nephrectomy of the contralateral kidney were performed 1 week after transplantation to reduce the renal mass. Four weeks after transplantation, the pigs were sacrificed and the hemirenal and control nephrectomy specimens were processed for morphometric analysis of glomerular capillary density and immunohistochemical analysis of VEGF expression. Soluble extracts from the kidneys were tested in an in vitro angiogenesis assay to determine their activity to influence angiogenesis. Statistical analysis with ANOVA was performed on the glomerular capillary density in kidney specimens.

RESULTS

All these parameters of angiogenesis were increased in the reduced renal mass autotransplants as compared to normal kidneys or whole kidney autotransplants. Glomerular capillary density was increased significantly after reduction in renal mass. VEGF expression also was increased progressively by the third week after reduction in renal mass. Soluble extract from the reduced renal mass transplants significantly increased the in vitro angiogenesis.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to demonstrate that angiogenesis is increased in the initial stages of reduction in renal mass after transplantation in a large animal model. Increased angiogenesis was found in this model earlier than reported in small animal models (2 weeks in pigs versus 6 weeks in rats). Taken together with other studies, our data suggest that derangement in angiogenesis could play an important role in long-term graft function after hemirenal transplantation.

Inadequate donor size in cadaver kidney transplantation

There have been conflicting reports that kidneys from small donors may be at increased risk for late graft failure if they are transplanted into large recipients. Data from the United States Renal Data System was used to study all first cadaver kidney transplantations performed during the years 1994 to 1999. Donor and recipient body surface area (BSA) combinations were included along with other patient and transplant characteristics in a Poisson analysis of factors associated with early (in the first 4 mo) and late (> or =4 mo) graft failure. The numbers of large (BSA >2.2 m(2)) and medium size (BSA 1.6 to 2.2 m(2)) recipients that received kidneys from small (BSA <1.6 m(2)) donors are less than expected (chi(2) = 118.09; P < 0.0001), suggesting that transplant centers may be refusing some kidneys on the basis of donor-recipient size differences. Large recipients who received kidneys from small donors made up 1.5% of the population and had a 43% (95% CI, 17 to 75%; P = 0.0004) increased risk of late graft failure compared with medium-size recipients who received kidneys from medium-size donors (53.4% of the population). Medium-size recipients who received kidneys from small donors made up 12.0% of the population and had a 16% (95% CI, 6 to 26%; P = 0.0012) increased risk of late graft failure. Disparities in recipient and donor size had similar adverse affects on mortality. Effects of recipient obesity (body mass index) and donor gender on late graft survival were no longer statistically significant after the effects of donor and recipient body size were taken into account. In conclusion, the relative size of the donor and recipient should possibly be taken into account when choosing kidneys for transplantation.

The poor accuracy of indirect measurements of cadaveric donor kidney weights

Reports that examined the issue of whether transplantation of inadequate nephron mass may be a risk factor for long-term allograft failure yielded conflicting results. One of the more accurate methods of estimating glomerular mass is kidney weight. Most of the clinical studies used body surface area (BSA) or kidney length as estimates of kidney weight. To test the hypothesis that indirect measures of kidney weight are accurate estimates of kidney weight, we compared the kidney weight of 41 consecutive cadaveric kidneys to donor BSA, dimensions measured with calipers at the time of transplantation, and dimensions supplied by the Organ Procurement Agency (OPA). Linear regression analysis was used with kidney weight as the dependent variable and BSA, kidney length, or kidney volume as the independent variable. Kidney length measured with calipers was also compared to kidney length supplied by the OPA. Kidney weight had the best correlation with kidney volume and kidney length determined by caliper measurements (r = 0.640 and 0.646, respectively). The regression analysis showed that the correlation of kidney weight with BSA was 0.487. The correlation of OPA-provided kidney length with kidney weights was poor (r = 0.410). The linear regression of caliper-measured kidney length versus OPA length yielded a slope of 0.360, instead of an ideal slope of 1. The assumption has been made that kidney weight or a surrogate of kidney weight has an excellent correlation with nephron mass. Some of the variability in studies that attempted to examine the effect of transplanted nephron mass on allograft outcome may be due to inaccurate estimates used for kidney weight. Our data suggest that surrogate measurements of kidney weight may not be accurate. We recommend that measured kidney weight should be used in studies examining the effect of donor renal mass on allograft outcomes.