Human peripheral blood leukocyte-reconstituted severe combined immunodeficient mouse: analysis of the human immune response against porcine islet transplantation

Porcine cell microchimerism but lack of productive porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) infection in naive and humanized SCID-beige mice treated with porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Pigs are considered a suitable source of cells and organs for xenotransplantation. All known strains of pigs contain porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) and PERV released by porcine cells may infect human cells in vitro and severe-combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice in vivo. Humanized SCID (hu-SCID) mice develop immune response to porcine antigens. Here we investigated PERV transmission in humanized SCID-beige mice using porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as the donor tissue (and the source of PERV). Mice were infused in the peritoneal cavity with 1.5-3.0 x 10(7) unfractionated human PBMC. Unfractionated porcine PBMC (1.5-3.0 x 10(7) cell/mouse) were infused to the mice simultaneously with human PBMC or 3 weeks after human PBMC infusion. The treated mice were monitored for weight and skin changes, donor cell chimerism, anti-pig antibodies and PERV transmission. All humanized mice tested 5-12 weeks after human PBMC transplantation were macrochimeric (up to 40% of cells in blood) for human cells, where 99% of the human cells were T-lymphocytes. Although human B lymphocytes were very rare in the blood of humanized mice at that point, the mice were positive for human anti-pig natural antibodies. The control SCID-beige mice or mice treated with porcine PBMC alone were negative for anti-porcine antibodies. Approximately 70% of the humanized mice treated with porcine PBMC were also microchimeric for porcine cells. Although some tissue samples of these mice were positive for PERV DNA in the absence of porcine DNA indicating PERV infection, the infection was non-productive as PERV transcripts were not detectable in those tissues. PERV infection of human and mouse cells in vitro by co-culturing with porcine PBMC was also non-productive. Humanized SCID-beige mice suffered weight loss and occasional minor skin changes due to graft vs. host disease caused by human PBMC but none of the mice showed observable effect attributable to the apparent PERV infection alone.

Natural antibodies prevent in vivo transmission of porcine islet-derived endogenous retrovirus to human cells

The discovery of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) has raised concerns regarding the safety of porcine xenotransplantation. However, transmission of PERV had not been observed in humans exposed to porcine tissue. We examined whether PERV derived from porcine pancreatic islet cells could infect human cells in vivo and the role of natural antibodies in inhibiting PERV infection. In vivo infective potential of PERV was studied in SCID mice reconstituted with human peripheral blood leucocytes. Porcine islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule. PERV infection was determined by analyzing PERV gene expression in graft infiltrating lymphocytes (GIL) harvested 21 days posttransplantation. Mice were administered normal human serum prior to and 2 days posttransplantation to study their role in protection of human cells against PERV infection. PERV genes were expressed in all porcine tissues examined, including purified porcine islets. PERV expression was detected in GILs from three of five human-SCID mice. Administration of human serum blocked PERV infection in GILs in five of five human-SCID mice. These results indicate that PERV from porcine islets can infect human cells in vivo. Normal human serum blocks transmission of retrovirus in vivo, suggesting that natural xenoreactive antibodies can prevent PERV infection.

Xenoreactive anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal antibodies prevent porcine endogenous retrovirus infection of human in vivo

The discovery of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) has raised concerns regarding the safety of pig to human xenotransplantation. In this study, we examined PERV infection of human cells in vivo. Furthermore, we examined the effect of human xenoreactive natural antibody on in vivo PERV infection. Human peripheral blood leukocyte reconstituted severe combined immunodeficiency mice were transplanted with porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC). PERV gene expression was readily detected in human leukocytes after transplantation. In contrast, human leukocytes harvested from mice treated with human serum or anti-Galalpha(1,3)Gal antibody prevented PERV infection in 6 of 8 mice. These results provide the first evidence that PERV can infect human cells in vivo and that natural xenoreactive antibody can prevent this infection.

In vitro recognition and impairment of pig islet cells by baboon immune cells: similarity to human cellular reactions

BACKGROUND

Grafting pig islets into patients with type 1 diabetes requires control of the strong cellular xenogeneic rejection. This in vitro study compared the cellular reaction of baboons and humans to pig islet cells (PICs) to confirm the validity of using these animals for further in vivo preclinical trials.

METHODS

Baboon or human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or subsets were co-incubated with PICs from specific pathogen-free adult pigs for 7 days to determine the mechanisms and intensity of PBMC proliferation. Interleukin (IL) 10 and interferon (IFN) gamma secretion were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Because proliferation was not indicative of aggression, a test based on perifusion analysis of the alteration of basal and stimulated insulin releases from PIC incubated with different baboon and human cells was developed.

RESULTS

Baboon PBMCs strongly proliferated in response to PICs (stimulation index [SI]=24.8+/-6.9 [n=8] vs. 23.9+/-3.4 [n=34] for human PBMCs), showing considerable variation in intensity among animals (2.3<SI<63) and humans (1.8<SI<97). PBMC proliferation was inhibited in baboons and humans by anti-CD4 (% inhibition of SI: 71+/-10% and 75+/-7%, respectively) and anti-DR (75+/-35% and 80+/-6%) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) or by depletion of MHC class II+ cells (99+/-1% and 90+/-6%). Blocking by anti-CD8 or anti-CD16 MoAbs was weaker and variable among both animals and humans. IL-10 production by baboon and human PBMCs in response to PICs increased more than IFN-gamma production after 2 days of coculture, but the IL-10/IFN-gamma ratio was inverted after 5 days of coculture. After 7 days (and even after only 2 days) of coculture with baboon (n=8) or human (n=18) PBMCs, basal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretions from PICs were almost completely abolished (P<0.0001). The drop in insulin release could have mainly resulted from lysis of PICs, because the number of PICs decreased by 78% after 7 days of co-incubation with PBMCs. A decrease of insulin release by PBMCs was reproduced with plastic-adherent cells and was abolished by depletion of MHC class II+ cells or by addition of 100 microg/ml gadolinium (which inhibits macrophages), but not by cyclosporine. In baboons, as in humans, insulin release was also decreased after coculture of PICs with enriched T lymphocytes remixed with antigen-presenting cells (APCs).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides the first data on in vitro comparison of baboon and human cell-mediated recognition and impairment of PICs. Proliferation of PBMCs against PICs involves mainly CD4 T cells, with indirect recognition mediated by baboon or human MHC class II+ APCs. The Th2/Th1 profile of cytokines secreted in response to PICs was similar in baboon and human PBMCs. The model based on alteration of insulin secretion indicates that PIC impairment by whole mononuclear cells was strong and rapid and that a crucial role was played by MHC class II+ and plastic-adherent cells. Two mechanisms appear to be responsible for the role of these cells: (1) early and strong direct effect, which is potentially involved in vivo in primary nonfunction of islets aggressed by monocytes and macrophages; and (2) presentation of PIC xenoantigens, which leads to impairment by T lymphocytes possibly involved in in vivo-specific cellular rejection. The mechanisms and intensity of baboon cellular reactions to PICs in vitro were similar to those observed in humans, which suggests that the baboon is a suitable model for the study of cellular mechanisms during preclinical trials of pig islet xenografts.

In vitro co-incubation of pig islet cells with xenogeneic human blood mononuclear cells causes loss of insulin release during perifusion: involvement of non-T-cell- and T-cell-mediated mechanisms

Because the different steps of the human cellular immune rejection of pig islets are still poorly understood, our previous work concerned the intensity and mechanisms of the proliferation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to adult pig islet cells (PIC). As lymphocyte proliferation is not indicative of alteration of PIC, the present in vitro study evaluated cell-mediated immune effectors possibly involved in impairment of adult PIC. A test was thus developed, based on perifusion analysis of the alteration of insulin release from PIC incubated with different human cells. Compared to PIC incubation alone or with autologous pig splenocytes, seven-day co-incubation with whole human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (n = 18) led to almost complete abolition of basal and stimulated insulin releases (p < 0.0001). This effect could not be reversed by extensive sequential washes before perifusion of PIC, and the number of PIC was decreased by 78% after seven-day co-incubation with PBMC. PBMC are a complex mixture of cells involved in different xenogeneic mechanisms, and two components of this PIC impairment were then detected separately. First, the effect of PBMC against PIC was decreased (p < 0.0001) after removal of either MHC class II+ or CD14+ cells from PBMC. On the contrary, decreasing effect (p < 0.001) on insulin secretion was observed when only plastic-adherent or CD14+ cells were co-incubated with PIC. Additionally, alteration of insulin release from PIC cultured with PBMC or plastic-adherent cells was abolished dose-dependently (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.04, respectively) by gadolinium chloride (which inhibits macrophages), but not modified by cyclosporin A or mycophenolate mofetil which did not alter insulin release from PIC but blocked the proliferation of PBMC against PIC. A second mechanism was also detected, since co-incubation of PIC with purified human T cells remixed with antigen-presenting cells led to a decrease (p < 0.0001) of insulin release. This model based on the alteration of dynamic basal and stimulated insulin secretion provides detailed account of in vitro human cell-mediated impairment of PIC. It shows that the xenogeneic effect of whole mononuclear cells was strong and rapid. A crucial role was played by MHC class II+, CD14+, and plastic-adherent cells. Two mechanisms appear to be responsible for the role of these cells: 1) early direct effect, potentially involved in vivo in primary nonfunction of islets aggressed by monocytes/macrophages; and 2) the presentation of PIC xenoantigens leading to impairment by T lymphocytes, which may be involved in in vivo specific cellular rejection.

Animal models in xenotransplantation

The severe shortage of donor organs has provided a strong impetus to push the investigation into the use of animal organs for humans. Xenotransplantation will not only benefit patients, but also represents a unique and potentially profitable business opportunity. However, there are many barriers to successful clinical xenotransplantation, including immunological barriers, physiological incompatibility, zoonosis and ethical concerns. This overview will focus on currently available animal models used in attempts to break through the immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. There are many advantages to using small animal, namely rodent, models in xenotransplantation research. For example, the use of the mouse model allows the use of knockout mice and careful dissection of rejection mechanisms at the molecular level. The following models can be used to study hyperacute rejection (HAR): guinea-pig-to-rat, mouse-to-rabbit, guinea-pig-to-mouse, rat-to-presensitised mouse and rat-to-alpha-Gal knockout mouse. The hamster-to-rat, mouse-to-rat and rat-to-mouse models are commonly used to study acute vascular rejection. Large animal models are complex and expensive, but they are more relevant to clinical xenotransplantation. Based on experiments using transgenic pig-to-primate models, HAR can be overcome. However, acute vascular rejection remains a major barrier at the present time. A pig cartilage-to-monkey model has been developed to study chronic rejection. Other novel models such as pig venous segment-to-monkey model and rat-to-primate model may represent viable options to study immunological barriers following xenotransplantation. Like many other medical breakthroughs, animal research will continue to make enormous contributions towards the eventual success of xenotransplantation.

Islet xenograft destruction in the hu-PBL-severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mouse necessitates anti-CD3 preactivation of human immune cells

Introduction of the hu-PBL-SCID mouse model has yielded a potentially useful tool for research in transplantation. The aim of this study was to define the conditions necessary for a reconstituted human immune system to destroy in a consistent manner rat islet xenografts in the alloxan-diabetic hu-PBL-SCID mouse. We examined different time points of hu-PBL reconstitution, different transplantation sites of the islets and several hu-PBL reconstitution protocols. Major differences in graft destruction were observed between the different hu-PBL reconstitution protocols, irrespective of timing of hu-PBL reconstitution or site of transplantation. Although preactivation of hu-PBL did not improve the level of hu-PBL chimerism, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the grafts revealed a severe human lymphocytic infiltration and beta cell destruction only in the grafts of mice receiving preactivated hu-PBL. This beta cell injury resulted in impaired glucose tolerance, with in some animals recurrence of hyperglycaemia, and decreased insulin and C-peptide levels after glucose stimulation. Therefore, we conclude that activation of hu-PBL prior to transfer is essential in achieving xenograft infiltration and destruction in hu-PBL-SCID mice. The need for immune manipulation suggests that interactions between hu-PBL and xenografts in this model may be hampered by incompatibilities in cross-species adhesion and/or activation signals.