Cytomegalovirus disease is associated with increased cost and hospital length of stay among orthotopic liver transplant recipients

Cost-effectiveness of Preemptive Therapy Versus Prophylaxis in a Randomized Clinical Trial for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Seronegative Liver Transplant Recipients With Seropositive Donors

BACKGROUND

The relative costs of preemptive therapy (PET) or prophylaxis for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk donor CMV-seropositive/recipient-seronegative (D+/R-) liver transplant recipients have not been assessed in the context of a randomized trial.

METHODS

A decision tree model was constructed based on the probability of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial that compared valganciclovir as PET or prophylaxis for 100 days in 205 D+/R- liver transplant recipients. Itemized costs for each site were obtained from a federal cost transparency database. Total costs included costs of implementation of the strategy and CMV disease treatment-related costs. Net cost per patient was estimated from the decision tree for each strategy.

RESULTS

PET was associated with a 10% lower absolute rate of CMV disease (9% vs 19%). The cost of treating a case of CMV disease in our patients was $88 190. Considering cost of implementation of strategy and treatment-related cost for CMV disease, the net cost-savings per patient associated with PET was $8707 compared to prophylaxis. PET remained cost-effective across a range of assumptions (varying costs of monitoring and treatment, and rates of disease).

CONCLUSIONS

PET is the dominant CMV prevention strategy in that it was associated with lower rates of CMV disease and lower overall costs compared to prophylaxis in D+/R- liver transplant recipients. Costs were driven primarily by more hospitalizations and higher CMV disease-associated costs due to delayed onset postprophylaxis disease in the prophylaxis group.

The Role of the Human Cytomegalovirus UL133-UL138 Gene Locus in Latency and Reactivation

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) latency, the means by which the virus persists indefinitely in an infected individual, is a major frontier of current research efforts in the field. Towards developing a comprehensive understanding of HCMV latency and its reactivation from latency, viral determinants of latency and reactivation and their host interactions that govern the latent state and reactivation from latency have been identified. The polycistronic UL133-UL138 locus encodes determinants of both latency and reactivation. In this review, we survey the model systems used to investigate latency and new findings from these systems. Particular focus is given to the roles of the UL133, UL135, UL136 and UL138 proteins in regulating viral latency and how their known host interactions contribute to regulating host signaling pathways towards the establishment of or exit from latency. Understanding the mechanisms underlying viral latency and reactivation is important in developing strategies to block reactivation and prevent CMV disease in immunocompromised individuals, such as transplant patients.

Host Genetics of Cytomegalovirus Pathogenesis

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous herpes virus (human herpes virus 5) with the highest morbidity and mortality rates compared to other herpes viruses. Risk groups include very young, elderly, transplant recipient, and immunocompromised individuals. HCMV may cause retinitis, encephalitis, hepatitis, esophagitis, colitis, pneumonia, neonatal infection sequelae, inflammatory, and age-related diseases. With an arsenal of genes in its large genome dedicated to host immune evasion, HCMV can block intrinsic cellular defenses and interfere with cellular immune responses. HCMV also encodes chemokines, chemokine receptors, and cytokines. Therefore, genes involved in human viral defense mechanisms and those encoding proteins targeted by the CMV proteins are candidates for host control of CMV infection and reactivation. Although still few in number, host genetic studies are producing valuable insights into biological processes involved in HCMV pathogenesis and HCMV-related diseases. For example, genetic variants in the immunoglobulin GM light chain can influence the antibody responsiveness to CMV glycoprotein B and modify risk of HCMV-related diseases. Moreover, CMV infection following organ transplantation has been associated with variants in genes encoding toll-like receptors (TLRs), programmed death-1 (PD-1), and interleukin-12p40 (IL-12B). A KIR haplotype (2DS4+) is proposed to be protective for CMV activation among hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Polymorphisms in the interferon lambda 3/4 (IFNL3/4) region are shown to influence susceptibility to CMV replication among solid organ transplant patients. Interestingly, the IFNL3/4 region is also associated with AIDS-related CMV retinitis susceptibility in HIV-infected patients. Likewise, interleukin-10 receptor 1 (IL-10R1) variants are shown to influence CMV retinitis development in patients with AIDS. Results from genome-wide association studies suggest a possible role for microtubule network and retinol metabolism in anti-CMV antibody response. Nevertheless, further genetic epidemiological studies with large cohorts, functional studies on the numerous HCMV genes, and immune response to chronic and latent states of infection that contribute to HCMV persistence are clearly necessary to elucidate the genetic mechanisms of CMV infection, reactivation, and pathogenesis.

Strategies for the prevention of infection after solid organ transplantation

Infection is a frequent complication of organ transplantation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Preventative antimicrobial strategies are a key component of the care received by transplant patients. This review summarizes the evidence supporting anti-infective prophylaxis in this setting. Specific recommendations for the prevention of bacterial, fungal, viral and parasitic infection after transplant are made, with a focus on recent developments in the field of transplant infectious diseases.

The value of pre-emptive therapy for cytomegalovirus after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are among the most common infections following liver transplantation. The main preventive methods for CMV infections are universal prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. In our study, we adopted a pre-emptive strategy in a higth-risk group of donor CMV-positive (D+)/recipient CMV-negative (R-) casses. We investigated whether this strategy was safe and effective to prevent CMV disease.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-nine liver transplantation recipients who underwent over a 15-year period were retrospectively analyzed after follow-up for at least 6 months (mean, 63 months). Weekly quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) measurements were performed to detect viral DNA. No CMV drug prophylaxis was given: antiviral CMV therapy was initiated when the PCR for CMV-DNA was >400 copies/mL.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of 159 liver transplant recipients enrolled in the study received antiviral therapy. High-risk patients (D+/R-) developed CMV infections significantly more often than D-/R- serostatus (P = .005). CMV disease was diagnosed in 12% of CMV-positive patients. Independent of serostatus in 14 cases (27.5%) virological recurrence of CMV infection occurred after primary treatment. Survival analysis showed no significant difference between patients with versus without CMV infection (P = .950). No relationship could be found between transplant rejection and CMV infection (P = .349).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that a pre-emptive strategy to prevent CMV disease was possible, even among the serological high-risk group. Only 12% of cases with CMV infection went on to manifest CMV disease with organ involvement. Survival curves were similar among patients with versus without CMV infections.

Evaluation of valganciclovir pharmacokinetics in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Valganciclovir is commonly used for cytomegalovirus prevention after lung transplantation. The pharmacokinetic profile of valganciclovir in lung transplant patients has not been well described or linked to efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, crossover study determined the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of 2 different doses of valganciclovir in lung transplant recipients and compared these profiles with intravenous ganciclovir.

RESULTS

Ten patients were evaluated. Patients were 56.8 ± 3.4 years old and had a mean creatinine clearance of 69 ± 9 ml/min. Oral bioavailability of ganciclovir after administration of valganciclovir was 59%, and mean half-life was 3.73 ± 1.15 hours. The maximal concentration after intravenous 5 mg/kg ganciclovir was significantly higher than after 450 mg valganciclovir (8.37 ± 3.03 mg/liter vs. 5.3 ± 2.09 mg/liter, respectively; p = 0.02) and similar to 900 mg valganciclovir (7.93 ± 3.97 mg/liter; p = 0.78). A higher area under the curve at 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) was found with 900 mg valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir (47.8 ± 19.7 vs 32.9 ± 10.8 mg · hour/liter, respectively; p = 0.049). The AUC(0-24) for 450 mg valganciclovir twice daily was 45.5 ± 22.9 mg · hour/liter.

CONCLUSION

Valganciclovir at 900 mg/day resulted in the equivalent of a mean daily dose of 7.7 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir. Higher systemic ganciclovir exposures occurred after 900 mg/day valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir. Valganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted in select lung transplant patients to avoid increased toxicity.

The association between cytomegalovirus immune globulin and long-term recipient and graft survival following liver transplantation

The association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune globulin (CMVIG) and long-term clinical outcomes has not been well defined. We examined the association between CMVIG and long-term recipient and graft survival in liver transplant recipients. Data were from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and included recipients transplanted between January 1995 and October 2008; follow-up was through March 2009. All recipients≤80 years of age with primary, single-organ liver transplants, given CMVIG with (n=2350) or without antivirals (n=455), antivirals without CMVIG (n = 32,939), or no CMV prophylaxis (n=28,508) before discharge were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine rates of acute rejection (AR), graft loss, and death, over 7 years post transplantation. The adjusted risk of AR, graft loss, and death associated with CMVIG with and without antivirals vs. no prophylaxis was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression. In the univariate analysis, CMVIG, with and without antivirals, was associated with increased AR rates, but decreased mortality; CMVIG with antivirals was also associated with decreased graft loss compared with no prophylaxis. From the multivariable model, CMVIG with antivirals was associated with increased risk for AR, but decreased risk for graft loss and death; after adjustment, the association between CMVIG alone and mortality was not significant. CMVIG with antivirals is associated with increased risk of AR but greater long-term patient and graft survival after liver transplantation.

The efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir in the prevention of symptomatic CMV infection in children after solid organ transplantation

Routine prophylaxis for CMV with valganciclovir is common in adult recipients but data to support its use in children are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. ganciclovir in a pediatric cohort. We performed a retrospective analysis of 92 children after KTx and/or LTx. All children have received IV ganciclovir for two wk, and then oral ganciclovir (TID; n = 41) before 2004, or valganciclovir (OD; n = 51) thereafter. Treatment was given for three months in R+/D+ or R+/D- recipients and for six months in R-/D+. Patients were followed for one yr post transplant. Both groups were comparable in their demographic and transplant-related history. Symptomatic CMV infection/disease developed in 13.7% vs. 19.5% of valganciclovir and ganciclovir groups, respectively (P-NS). Time-to-onset of CMV infection was comparable in both groups (P-NS); rates of acute allograft rejection were similar in both groups (3.9% vs. 9.8%). Risk factors for CMV infection included young age, serostatus of R-/D+, and allograft from cadaver donor. No significant side effects were noted in both groups. As in adults, valganciclovir appears to be as efficacious and safe as oral ganciclovir. Valganciclovir should be considered as a possible prophylactic treatment for CMV in pediatric recipients of KTx or LTx.

The 'indirect' effects of cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the most important infection in the immunocompromized host even in the era of effective therapy. CMV is usually acquired early in life and can be transmitted by contact with infected body fluids. In the immunocompetent population, primary infection is almost always of little clinical consequence. However, CMV infection in immunocompromized patients, especially those naive to CMV exposure, can cause tissue invasive disease, severe symptoms and/or death. However, beyond these direct effects, increasing in vitro evidence is accumulating that suggests CMV has many other effects on the host's immune response which may explain some of the detrimental consequences for the immunosuppressed patient, and may also be partially responsible for a variety of conditions in immunocompetent individuals. In its latent state, CMV employs several mechanisms to evade detection by the host's immune system. The virus also employs other methods to take advantage of activation of the immune system and replicate in sites of inflammation. This review focuses on the immunosuppressive and inflammatory mechanisms that have been attributed to CMV and will relate them to some of the clinical sequellae that have been associated with the indirect effects of CMV infection.

Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission

We examined the relationship between the total cost incurred by liver transplantation (LT) recipients and their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of transplant. We used a novel database linking billing claims from a large private payer with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Included were adults who underwent LT from March 2002 through August 2007 (n = 990). Claims within the year preceding and following transplantation were analyzed according to the recipient's calculated MELD score. Cost was the primary endpoint and was assessed by the length of stay and charges. Transplant admission charges represented approximately 50% of the total cost of LT. MELD was a significant cost driver for pretransplant, transplant, and total charges. A MELD score of 28 to 40 was associated with additional charges of $349,213 (P < 0.05) in comparison with a score of 15 to 20. Pretransplant and transplant admission charges were higher by $152,819 (P < 0.05) and $64,286 (P < 0.05), respectively, in this higher MELD group. No differences by MELD score were found for posttransplant charges. Those in the highest MELD group also experienced longer hospital stays both in the pretransplant period and at the time of LT but did not have higher rates of re-admissions. In conclusion, high-MELD patients incur significantly higher costs prior to and at the time of LT. Following LT, the MELD score is not a significant predictor of cost or re-admission.

Assessing the economic merits of managing cytomegalovirus infection in organ and stem cell transplantation

Two preventative approaches exist to manage cytomegalovirus (CMV), a common infection in recipients of organ and stem cell transplants: prophylaxis--the prevention of viraemia--and pre-emptive therapy--the prevention of manifestation of disease in patients who have viraemia. Economic evaluation may provide a helpful framework to inform the choice between these two approaches. However, several issues arise. Direct comparisons of prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are rare and there are few epidemiological data that depict the full natural history of CMV infection and disease. There is a need for large, prospective randomised trials that directly compare these two strategies and are of sufficient duration to assess their overall impact on direct and indirect effects of CMV as well as patient quality of life. These methodological issues are relevant to the economic evaluation of preventative measures in other clinical settings and highlight the need for a rigorous evaluative framework to best inform decision making about the optimal strategy for patients.

A single-center experience with ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus in lung transplant recipients: treatment and outcome

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation despite ganciclovir prophylaxis. The emergence of ganciclovir-resistant CMV in lung transplant patients has been reported, although the optimal strategy for the management of these infections remains uncertain. A review of the results of glanciclovir susceptibility testing in lung transplant recipients was performed.

METHODS

We found 54% (113 of 210) of lung transplant patients developed CMV infection over a 4-year study period with ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection occurring in >5% of patients (6 of 113). The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who developed ganciclovir-resistant vs -sensitive CMV infection were similar, although 50% (3 of 6) patients who developed resistance were CMV mismatched (D(+)/R(-) serology). All patients' CMV isolates had mutations in the UL97 gene. In addition, the 3 mismatch patients also had CMV with mutations in the UL54 gene.

RESULTS

Treatment with a combination of foscarnet and ganciclovir or foscarnet alone for ganciclovir-resistant infection led to a significant reduction in virologic load in all patients (p = 0.03), although transient increases in viremia were observed in some patients early after treatment. Renal function worsened after treatment, but overall it was not significantly different from pre-treatment values (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Single or combination therapy with foscarnet is effective for treatment of ganciclovir-resistant isolates and excessive concern regarding toxicity should not preclude consideration of these treatments when clinically indicated.

Cost of prophylaxis in the management of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Limited economic data exist on the use of valganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We compared the economics of sequential i.v. and oral ganciclovir prophylaxis vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis alone in high-risk (D+/R-) SOT patients.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was performed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System comparing the cost of sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis (induction with i.v. ganciclovir 10 mg/kg daily for 14 d followed by oral ganciclovir 1 g t.i.d. for 3 months) vs. oral valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily for 100 d). Resource utilization data for both regimens were obtained from the literature and from clinical records of 83 patients in nine Spanish hospitals. Results were expressed as average cost per patient treated.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient treated with sequential ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis was euro3715.51 and euro3295.90, respectively. The higher cost of ganciclovir therapy was due to concomitant administration of anti-CMV immunoglobulin (euro313.73), drug administration costs (euro401.45), catheter culture tests (euro13.64) and adverse events associated with catheter use (euro3.30). Following a sensitivity analysis, taking into account dose and duration of drug, concomitant medications and adverse events, costs for valganciclovir and sequential therapy were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Valganciclovir prophylaxis is as economical as sequential ganciclovir prophylaxis in high-risk D+/R- SOT patients. In addition, the once-daily dosing regimen of valganciclovir is more convenient, and avoids the complications associated with catheter use.

Acute renal disease, as defined by the RIFLE criteria, post-liver transplantation

Acute renal failure (ARF) can complicate up to 60% of orthotopic liver transplants (OLT). The RIFLE criteria were developed to provide a consensus definition for acute renal disease in critically ill patients. Using the RIFLE criteria, we aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for ARF and acute renal injury (ARI), and to evaluate the link with the outcomes, patient survival and length of hospital stay. Three hundred patients, who received 359 OLTs, were retrospectively analyzed. ARI and ARF occurred post 11.1 and 25.7% of OLTs, respectively. By multivariate analysis, ARI was associated with pre-OLT hypertension and alcoholic liver disease and ARF with higher pre-OLT creatinine, inotrope and aminoglycoside use. ARF, but not ARI, had an impact on 30-day and 1-year patient survival and longer length of hospital stay. ARI and ARF, as defined by the RIFLE criteria, are common complications of OLT, with distinct risk factors and ARF has serious clinical consequences. The development of a consensus definition is a welcome advance, however these criteria do need to be validated in large studies in a wide variety of patient populations.

Temporal trends in early clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization for liver transplantation in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Procedures such as liver transplantation, which entail large costs while benefiting only a small percentage of the population, are being increasingly scrutinized by third-party payors. The purpose of our study was to conduct a longitudinal analysis of the early clinical outcomes and health care resource utilization for liver transplantation in the United States.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to conduct a longitudinal analysis of the clinical outcome and resource utilization data for liver transplantation procedures in adult recipients performed in the United States over three time periods (Period I: 1988-1993; Period II: 1994-1998: Period III: 1999-2003).

RESULTS

Compared to Period I, adult liver transplant recipients were more likely to be male, older, and non-White in Period III. Recipients were more likely to have at least one major comorbidity preoperatively than in Period I. The in-hospital mortality rate after liver transplantation decreased significantly from Period I to Period III, but the major intraoperative and postoperative complication rates increased over the same time period. Mean length of hospital stay decreased over the 15-year period, but the percentage of patients with a non-routine discharge status increased.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the rate of postoperative complications and non-routine discharges after liver transplantation is increasing. However, these negative changes in the cost-outcomes relationship for liver transplantation are balanced by improving postoperative survival rates and reductions in the length of hospital stay.

Valganciclovir preemptive therapy for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk seropositive solid-organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The role of valganciclovir in the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk seropositive transplant patients is not known.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 301 seropositive solid organ transplant recipients to assess the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir (VGCV) in the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk patients. Asymptomatic patients with an antigenemia test >or=25 positive cells/2x10(5) polymorphonuclear cells received valganciclovir 900 mg twice a day as preemptive therapy until resolution of antigenemia (minimum 14 days). Additionally, patients treated with antilymphocytic drugs for more than 6 days received prophylaxis with VGCV 900 mg once a day during 90 days. Mean follow-up was 14 months (range 6-20 months).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients received VGCV; 24 as preemptive therapy and 14 due to the use of antilymphocytic drugs. No patient developed CMV disease during the follow-up. Viral load (antigenemia) decreased a mean of 78% from baseline after 7 days of VGCV therapy (P=0.024) and 98% at day 14 (P=0.029). Two patients showed a relapse of the antigenemia test >or=25 positive cells and were successfully treated with a repeated course of VGCV. Leukopenia (<2500/mm3) developed in 3/24 (12.5%) recipients in the preemptive therapy group and required to discontinuing the drug in one of them.

CONCLUSIONS

VGCV is safe and highly efficacious in the prevention of CMV disease in high-risk seropositive organ transplant recipients.

Impact of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis on rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation

With improved cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis, CMV disease after liver transplantation has decreased dramatically, and patient and graft survival have improved. We examined the impact of CMV prophylaxis on biopsy proven rejection after orthotopic liver transplantation by analyzing data on 192 liver recipients over 5 years (1994-1999). Risk factors assessed for biopsy proven rejection including donor and recipient age, CMV serostatus; CMV prophylaxis; immunosuppression; bacteremia and blood product use were examined over a 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for rejection showed that bacteremia (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.39-9.36, P=0.008), donor age (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06-1.36, per 10 year increase, P=0.004), and use of cyclosporine as initial immunosuppression compared to tacrolimus (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.09, P=0.003) were associated with increased risk; ganciclovir prophylaxis for 3 months (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79, P=0.003) and recipient age (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63-0.96, for each 10 year increase, P=0.03) were associated with decreased risk. We conclude that, the use of CMV prophylaxis with ganciclovir significantly reduces the incidence of biopsy proven rejection in liver transplant recipients.

Economic evaluation of everolimus vs. azathioprine at one year after de novo heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Everolimus decreases acute rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation. We compared within-trial costs and resource use over 1 yr of follow-up in de novo heart transplant patients randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg/d (n = 209), everolimus 3.0 mg/d (n = 211), or azathioprine (n = 214).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Resource use data were collected prospectively for 634 patients from 14 countries. We used the nonparametric bootstrap method to test for differences in mean costs and to estimate confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

Everolimus patients had lower incidence of efficacy failure compared with azathioprine patients (41.6%, everolimus 1.5 mg; 32.2%, everolimus 3.0 mg; 52.8%, azathioprine). Compared with patients receiving azathioprine, everolimus patients spent more days in the hospital [36.3 d for everolimus 1.5 mg/d (p = 0.21); 38.4 d for everolimus 3.0 mg/d (p = 0.01); 32.2 d for azathioprine]. Mean total costs, excluding the study medications, were not significantly different among treatment groups ($72 065 for everolimus 1.5 mg; $72 631 for everolimus 3.0 mg; $70 815 for azathioprine).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 1 yr of follow-up after heart transplantation, everolimus did not significantly increase treatment costs, excluding the costs of the study medications, while reducing efficacy failure. Longer follow-up and the cost of everolimus are required to fully evaluate the cost-effectiveness of everolimus vs. azathioprine in post-transplant maintenance.

Impact of targeted oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for transplant recipients of livers from cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors

OBJECTIVES

Symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection can cause significant morbidity and occasional mortality after liver transplantation. In a previous audit, we showed that donor CMV seropositivity (D+) was a risk factor for symptomatic infection, and we estimated the likely clinical and financial impact of 14 weeks of oral ganciclovir prophylaxis given to recipients of CMV-seropositive organs. In August 2001, we adopted this policy of targeted oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for recipients of CMV-seropositive livers.

METHOD

The additional costs of adopting targeted prophylaxis policy for 1 year, patient and doctor compliance with the new strategy, and its clinical impact were analysed.

RESULTS

Targeted prophylaxis reduced the incidence of symptomatic CMV infection from 9.5% (in the earlier cohort that did not receive prophylaxis) to 5.8% (P = NS). Symptomatic infection was not observed in CMV-seropositive recipients of CMV-seropositive donor livers (P = 0.06 for comparison of the 2 cohorts), but the incidence of symptomatic infection in the CMV-seronegative recipients of CMV-seropositive organs did not change. However, symptomatic infection appeared to be less severe and was delayed by ganciclovir prophylaxis (median time from transplantation to symptom onset 96 vs. 39 days without prophylaxis). Death attributable to CMV infection was not observed in the cohort that received prophylaxis. The additional cost associated with implementation of the prophylaxis strategy was 108,068 pounds sterlings.

CONCLUSION

Targeted CMV prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir reduces the incidence and severity of symptomatic infection and appears to be a cost-effective means of improving outcome following liver transplantation.

Valganciclovir: oral prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host

Herpes virus infections, particularly those caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), lead to significant and, sometimes severe, clinical problems for the immunocompromised host. As effective agents have become available, several treatment and prevention strategies have evolved over the past decade, first in intra-venous form and more recently, as oral preparations. Valganciclovir, the valine ester of ganciclovir, is an orally administered, potent, antiviral agent active against all herpes viruses. When taken orally, valganciclovir has much-improved bioavailability compared with oral ganciclovir and achieves ganciclovir exposures similar to intravenous ganciclovir. Clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir for the treatment of new AIDS-associated CMV retinitis showed equivalency to intravenous ganciclovir and prevented progression of quiescent disease. In solid organ recipients, once-daily valganciclovir has been proven equivalent to oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection. The high bioavailability and convenient dosing formulation make valganciclovir an attractive option for these indications.

The Clinical Impact of Ganciclovir Prophylaxis on the Occurrence of Bacteremia in Orthotopic Liver Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or receipt of a CMV-seropositive donor liver has been shown to be an independent predictor of bacteremia in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. However, prevention of CMV infection through use of intense CMV prophylaxis has not been examined to assess the impact on bacteremia in liver transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed the impact of CMV prophylaxis on rates of bacteremia by examining 192 consecutive OLT recipients during a 2-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were 29 episodes of bacteremia. Univariate analysis of risk factors for bacteremia showed that invasive fungal disease, initial anti-lymphocyte immunosuppression, treatment for rejection, and use of solumedrol were significantly associated with increased risk. Receipt of >or=14 days of ganciclovir prophylaxis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.18-0.87; P=.02), end-to-end biliary anastomosis, and receipt of <10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) were significantly associated with a decreased risk. Three-variable analysis controlling for end-to-end anastomosis and use of <10 units of RBCs, showed that use of >or=14 days of ganciclovir was still associated with a reduced risk of bacteremia (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98; P=.0437).

CONCLUSIONS

Among factors associated with bacteremia, use of prophylactic ganciclovir is independently associated with a significant reduction of bacteremia in OLT recipients.

Cytomegalovirus and lung transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a serious problem in lung transplant recipients. Development of potent oral antiviral agents, molecular techniques for the detection of infection and its response to therapy and the emergence of isolates with antiviral resistance have had significant impacts on the approach to CMV in these patients. This article discusses the following issues as part of a comprehensive CMV management strategy in lung transplant recipients: (1) Prevention strategies in the era of potent oral antiviral agents, (2) the role of new diagnostic techniques in the management of CMV, (3) treatment regimens for established CMV infection or disease, (4) the potential impact of treatment of CMV on the indirect effects on long-term allograft function, and (5) the incidence, risk factors for and impact of ganciclovir resistance following lung transplantation.

Aciclovir or ganciclovir universal prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplantation: an economic analysis

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) following orthotopic liver transplantation can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylaxis with oral aciclovir (ACV) or ganciclovir (GCV) for all transplant recipients (universal prophylaxis) may be beneficial, but which agent is more cost-effective is unknown.

METHODS

A single centre, retrospective study of all patients who had OLT at the Western Australian Liver Transplantation Service was performed. Patients received ACV from 1992 to 1998, and GCV from 1999 to 2001. A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis for the two groups was performed based on the mean total cost of the number of cases of CMV infection and disease as the clinical end-point.

RESULTS

The ACV group comprised of 55 patients and there were 24 in the GCV group. The incidence of CMV disease was 7% and 4% for the ACV and GCV groups, respectively (P > 0.05). For CMV infection it was 16% and 8%, respectively (P > 0.05). GCV prevented more cases of CMV infection and disease than ACV but at an incremental cost of dollars A20,000 (dollars US10,172) per case prevented. Overall, ACV was more cost-effective than GCV by dollars A2200 (dollars US1119) per person. The cost benefit of ACV was derived principally through a reduced pharmaceutical cost. Both agents were well tolerated without development of antiviral resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal prophylaxis of CMV infection-following liver transplantation with aciclovir is more cost-effective than with ganciclovir.

[Efficacy preemptive therapy with ganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In liver transplant recipients the most frequent infection is that produced by cytomegalovirus (CMV). One of the methods to reduce the incidence of that infection is the CMV pp65 antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy with intravenous ganciclovir.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Liver transplant recipients were tested for CMV antigenemia at days 14, 28, 45, 60, 90 and 180 postransplantation and when clinically indicated. Patients showing > 50/200.000 leukocytes received ganciclovir 5 mg/kg/12 h for 14 days. Risk factors for active CMV disease where studied.

RESULTS

182 CMV seropositive patients where included in the study. 16 patients with > 50/200.000 leukocytes received ganciclovir as preemptive therapy. CMV disease appeared in 9/182 patients (4.9%): 2/16 who received PT and 7/166 among those who did not receive preemptive therapy. The only factor associated with increased incidence of CMV disease was to have missing samples for CMV antigenemia during the follow up (p < 0.0042; OR = 8,17; 95% CI, 1.94-34.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Ganciclovir antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy is associated with a low incidence of CMV disease. Bad adherence to the protocol of antigenemia samples increases the risk for CMV disease.

Cytomegalovirus disease following liver transplantation: an analysis of prophylaxis strategies

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following liver transplantation. Though oral ganciclovir may be used as a prophylactic agent, there is some debate as to whether prophylaxis should be given universally or to targeted 'high risk' sub-groups. We, therefore, analysed the cost-effectiveness of both prophylactic strategies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult liver transplant (LT) recipients who developed CMV disease in 1997 and estimated the morbidity and costs associated with disease in these patients. These costs were compared with the estimated cost (based on a previous multi-centre study) of using oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in order to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of introducing different prophylactic regimes.

RESULTS

Universal and targeted prophylaxis would both have prevented all the likely mortality (2 deaths) from CMV disease in that year. The net cost of applying a targeted prophylaxis strategy would have been 206,275 pounds, (i.e. 103,137 pounds per death avoided). The cost per life year saved would have been 15,674 pounds.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that LT units should identify patients at high risk for the development of CMV disease and adopt a targeted prophylactic strategy.

The association of cytomegalovirus sero-pairing with outcomes and costs following cadaveric renal transplantation prior to the introduction of oral ganciclovir CMV prophylaxis

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity, mortality and cost in cadaveric renal transplantation. This study was designed to document the clinical and economic outcomes associated with donor and recipient CMV sero-pairing. Data were drawn from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) on 17 001 cadaveric renal transplant recipients transplanted between 1995 and 1997 with recorded donor and recipient CMV sero-status. In multivariate analysis, CMV-seropositive recipients were associated with a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function, a lower incidence of graft loss, and lower costs than CMV-seronegative recipients. CMV-seropositive compared to seronegative donors were associated with significantly higher incidence of CMV disease, graft loss, and higher costs when transplanted into CMV-seronegative recipients. However, CMV-seronegative donors into seropositive recipients had no significant association with outcome beyond a higher incidence of CMV disease compared to CMV-seronegative donor and recipient pairs. The outcomes associated with CMV-seropositive donors and seronegative recipients call for tailored management strategies which may include avoidance of such mismatching, antiviral therapy, immunization, or modified immunosuppression.

Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplantation: economic implications

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a pathogen, commonly encountered in the recipients of solid organ transplantation and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. CMV infection and disease have been shown to increase the cost of care in transplant recipients and several different strategies of prevention have been shown to be effective in clinical trials. A systematic review of published information on the economic impact of CMV in solid organ transplantation was performed; both clinical- and decision-analysis-based studies were reviewed. Clinical studies have shown that CMV infection and disease is associated with increased length of hospital stay and overall costs. Decision-analysis-based studies suggest that in general, antiviral chemoprophylaxis against CMV in transplant recipients is a cost-effective intervention compared with other established healthcare interventions such as strategies for colorectal cancer screening. Prophylaxis with oral or parenteral ganciclovir is probably the most cost-effective strategy; however, restricting prophylaxis to high-risk groups (such as donor seropositive/recipient seronegative status and the use of an antilymphocyte antibody) or chemoprophylaxis for an extended period does not improve cost effectiveness. Pre-emptive therapy is an evolving strategy for prevention of CMV disease in transplant recipients and is rapidly gaining in popularity. Well-designed trials incorporating prospective cost data and comparing pre-emptive therapy versus conventional antiviral prophylaxis are needed to establish the superiority of one strategy over the other.

Economic impact of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has a direct effect on morbidity in solid organ transplantation patients, and indirect effects related to the development of opportunistic infections, allograft rejection, and patient mortality. Although intuitively it follows that costs attributable to CMV infections would be increased, direct proof has remained elusive. Accumulating evidence suggests, however, that CMV infection has a significant impact on the costs to transplantation programs, particularly in seronegative recipients of seropositive allografts (D+/R-), and additional costs may be incurred through the effects on CMV potentiating the risks of various opportunistic infections leading to graft rejection.

The economic value of valacyclovir prophylaxis in transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease, with its extensive direct and indirect consequences, adds considerably to the cost of patient management in both solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Antiviral prophylaxis for CMV infection can offer cost advantages over preemptive therapy and "wait-and-treat" approaches. Valacyclovir has demonstrated efficacy for CMV prophylaxis in renal, heart, and bone marrow transplantation and is cost-effective when compared with placebo in renal transplant recipients at high risk of CMV infection. In reducing CMV infection and disease, valacyclovir prophylaxis appears to be associated with reductions in indirect effects of CMV (acute graft rejection, other opportunistic infections) and, if these effects are considered, the potential exists for even greater savings to be made with valacyclovir therapy. Benefits of valacyclovir in transplantation extend beyond CMV to other herpesviruses and may be increased in some clinical situations by prolonging prophylaxis beyond 3 months.

Beta-herpesvirus challenges in the transplant recipient

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has major consequences after allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplantation. CMV may cause significant morbidity and mortality, and monitoring to detect reactivation to reduce disease or management of end organ disease is associated with increased resource utilization. Two other members of the beta-herpesvirus family, human herpesvirus (HHV) type 6 and HHV-7, are increasingly recognized as important pathogens in transplant recipients, either by direct infection (e.g., encephalitis, hepatitis, or pneumonitis) or via interaction with CMV. In addition to direct effects of CMV infection, such indirect effects as an increased risk for bacterial and fungal infections or impaired graft acceptance and function are important research topics. Diagnosis and treatment of CMV infection is currently more advanced than for HHV-6 and HHV-7.

The impact of human herpesvirus-6 and -7 infection on the outcome of liver transplantation

Human herpesvirus (HHV)-6 and -7 are novel members of the beta-herpesvirus family that maintain latency in the human host after primary infection. Reactivation from latency and/or increased degree of viral replication occurs during periods of immune dysfunction. The clinical effect of HHV-6 and HHV-7 reactivation in recipients of liver transplants is now being recognized. Clinical illnesses such as fever, rash, pneumonitis, encephalitis, hepatitis, and myelosuppression have been described in a number of anecdotal reports. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests that the more important effect of HHV-6 and HHV-7 reactivation on the outcomes of liver transplantation may be mediated indirectly by their interactions with the other beta-herpesvirus-cytomegalovirus (CMV). Coinfection among these three beta-herpesviruses in clinical syndromes that were classically ascribed to be solely caused by CMV has been shown and has raised substantial interest in the potential role of HHV-6 and HHV-7 as copathogens in the direct and indirect illnesses caused by CMV. This article reviews the current scientific data on the role and the magnitude of impact of HHV-6 and HHV-7 infection on the outcomes of liver transplantation.

Modeling costs and cost-effectiveness of different CMV management strategies in liver transplant recipients as a support for current and future decision making

OBJECTIVES

To develop a generic decision-analytic model to predict health and economic outcomes of different management options for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in liver transplant patients.

METHODS AND DATA

The model considers different CMV management strategies, thereby emphasizing the important difference between infection and disease. The first strategy starts with prophylaxis prior to transplantation, followed by preemptive treatment if infection, based on positive CMV diagnostic tests, is confirmed. The second strategy is a preemptive strategy consisting of only testing followed by preemptive treatment. Finally, in the wait-and-treat strategy, antiviral treatment is only started when clinical signs of CMV disease appear. Management and resource-use data were obtained from clinical experts in large transplant centers in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Cost data were collected from the health care payer's perspective. A Bayesian revision technique was applied to distinguish effectiveness of current management options for CMV infection vs. CMV disease, an aspect that is currently underreported in literature.

RESULTS

CMV prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients is generally more cost-effective than preemptive and wait-and-treat strategies. In order of importance, changes in drug costs, drug efficacy, specificity of CMV testing, cost of hospitalization, probability of CMV relapse and baseline CMV risk are the most important factors influencing the cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

This model describes different strategies applied for management of CMV in liver transplant patients and is useful both for current decision making, optimal disease management, and assessment of future research targets.

Distinguishing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease with CMV nucleic acid assays

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among transplant recipients. Molecular assays have been developed for the detection and quantification of CMV nucleic acid. In evaluating the clinical utility of these assays, correlations with clinical outcome are essential. The Amplicor CMV Monitor and NucliSens CMV pp67 tests were compared to the CMV antigenemia assay for 45 transplant recipients and 1 patient with Wegener's granulomatosis. Twenty-three patients remained antigenemia negative throughout the monitoring period, none of whom developed CMV disease. In this patient group, both the Amplicor and NucliSens assays showed very high specificity; only 1 of the 324 specimens assayed by NucliSens and none of the 303 specimens assayed by Amplicor were positive. Twenty-three patients were antigenemia positive during the monitoring period, 12 of whom developed 13 episodes of symptomatic CMV disease. In this patient group, the NucliSens assay was positive at or before the development of symptoms in 12 of the 13 episodes of CMV disease. All eight patients with symptomatic CMV disease who were tested by the Amplicor assay were positive at or before the development of disease. For the 11 asymptomatic patients, the NucliSens assay was positive less frequently than the antigenemia or Amplicor assays. The NucliSens assay was more likely to be positive at higher antigenemia or viral load levels. Both the NucliSens and Amplicor assays appear to have clinical utility in monitoring patients for CMV disease.

Prospective randomized trial to assess the value of preemptive oral therapy for CMV infection following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

With the development of sensitive tests to detect cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, preemptive approaches become a reasonable alternative to general CMV prophylaxis. We performed a randomized trial comparing pp65-antigenemia guided preemptive therapy using oral ganciclovir with symptom-triggered intravenous ganciclovir treatment.

METHODS

Eighty-eight of 372 liver transplant recipients developed antigenemia early after orthotopic liver transplantation. Twenty-eight symptomatic patients with antigenemia were excluded from randomization and treated with intravenous ganciclovir. Sixty pp65-antigen-positive asymptomatic patients were randomized to receive either oral ganciclovir 3x1 g/day for 14 days (group 1) or no preemptive treatment (group 2). Patients that developed CMV disease were treated with intravenous ganciclovir 2x5 mg/kg body weight for 14 days. The high-risk (Donor+/Recipient-) patients were equally distributed in the two study groups.

RESULTS

Three of 30 (10%) patients on oral ganciclovir developed mild to moderate CMV disease compared with 6/30 (20%) patients in the control group. In the Donor+/Recipient- patients, the incidence of CMV disease was 1/6 and 3/7. All disease episodes resolved after intravenous treatment. The 1- and 3-year patient and organ survival was the same in the study groups and in the patients with or without CMV infection. No deaths related to CMV occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The positive predictive value of pp65-antigenemia for the development of CMV disease was very low, and, in 28/88 patients (32%), antigenemia did not precede symptoms. Therefore, pp65-antigenemia is of limited value in deciding on the timing and need for ganciclovir therapy after liver transplantation.

Oral valganciclovir: a new option for treatment of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in immunocompromised hosts

Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and serious CMV disease. CMV infection is an important cause of morbidity among patients infected with HIV and after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and may cause life-threatening disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. The introduction into clinical use of potent antiviral compounds and of rapid detection assays for CMV during the past two decades has allowed development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of disease caused by CMV in these groups of immunocompromised patients. At present, the antiviral drugs ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir are commonly used in the treatment of CMV infection and disease. However, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and, for systemic use, require iv. administration for most indications. Valganciclovir is an oral prodrug of ganciclovir, with a 10-fold greater bioavailability than oral ganciclovir. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir among HIV-infected CMV-seropositive patients and liver transplant recipients suggest that this oral compound has the potential to replace both oral and iv. ganciclovir in many situations if it is shown to be as efficacious and safe as those ganciclovir formulations in immunodeficient patients. In the first part of this review, currently established approaches to the management of CMV infection and disease in SCT and SOT recipients and HIV-infected patients are discussed to highlight possible indications for future valganciclovir use; in the second part, data from human studies of valganciclovir are presented.

The effect of surgical site infections on outcomes and resource utilization after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although postoperative infections have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), less is known about their economic implications. In this study, we sought to identify risk factors and estimate the impact of surgical site infections on 1-year mortality, graft survival, and resource utilization after OLT.

METHODS

We studied 777 first, single-organ liver transplant recipients from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database. Surgical site infections (n = 292, 37.8%) were defined as bacterial or fungal infections of the liver, intestine, biliary tract, surgical wound, or peritoneum within 1 year of transplantation. A subset of these (n = 159) occurred during the transplant hospitalization and were used to estimate excess charges associated with surgical site infections.

RESULTS

Leaks in the choledochojejunostomy (odds ratio [OR] = 7.1, P =.001) and choledochocholedochostomy (OR = 2.5, P =.002), extended operation duration in hours (OR = 1.2, P =.002), serum albumin levels in grams per liters (OR = 0.71, P =.009), ascites (OR = 1.43, P =.037), and administration of OKT3 within 7 days (OR = 1.49, P =.039) significantly increased risk of infection. Surgical site infections did not significantly increase 1-year mortality (88.5% vs 91.5%, P =.19) but significantly increased 1-year graft loss (79.8% vs 86.5%, P =.022). Patients with surgical site infections incurred approximately 24 extra hospital days and $159,967 in excess charges (P =.0001). Multivariate analysis reduced the estimate of excess charges to $131,276 (P =.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplant recipients who develop surgical site infection have significantly higher resource utilization requirements than those who do not. These results imply substantial returns to preventative efforts directed at surgical site infections in patients undergoing OLT.

Preemptive therapy versus universal prophylaxis with ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients

Whether preemptive therapy or universal prophylaxis with ganciclovir is the optimal approach against cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains unresolved. Controversy abounds with respect to the efficacy of preemptive therapy, the reliability of preemptive therapy tools, the logistical difficulties in conducting surveillance monitoring for CMV, the cost of prophylaxis, the effect of prophylaxis on indirect sequelae of CMV and epidemiology of CMV, and the potential for emergence of ganciclovir-resistant CMV. Although neither approach is wholly adequate, a discussion of the relative merits and limitations of the 2 approaches may guide the selection of a rational approach toward prevention of CMV infection in organ transplant recipients.

Comparison between antigenemia and a quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antigenemia and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are widely used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) diagnosis after heart transplantation due to their enhanced predictive values for disease detection when specific cut-off values are used. The purpose of this study was to compare, in the same patient setting, the predictive values of quantitative PCR and antigenemia for CMV disease detection, using specific cut-off values.

METHODS

Thirty heart transplant receptors were ch prospectively monitored for active CMV infection and disease detection, using quantitative PCR and anti- po genemia. Positive and negative predictive values for pr CMV disease detection were calculated using cut-off pr values for both antigenemia (5 and 10 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils) and quantitative-PCR (50,000 and 100,000 copies/10(6) leukocytes).

RESULTS

Active CMV infection was diagnosed in 93.3% of patients and CMV disease in 23.3%. The positive and negative predictive (%) values for CMV disease detection were 35/100 and 46.7/100, respectively, for quantitative PCR and antigenemia. Using 5 and 10 positive cells/300,000 neutrophils as cut-off values for antigenemia, the positive and negative predictive values (%) for disease detection were respectively 63.6/100 and 70/100. For quantitative PCR, the positive and th negative predictive values (%) for cut-off values of to 50,000 and 100,000 copies/10(6) leukocytes were 53.8/100 and 60/94.1, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our series, antigenemia and quantitative-PCR had enhanced and similar predictive values for CMV disease detection when specific cut-off values were used. The choice between these two methods for disease detection may rely less on their efficiency and more on the experience and familiarity with them.

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid-organ transplants

The introduction and combination of more-potent immunosuppressive regimens, and the increased transplantation of organs into more severely ill patients, have again placed cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in the spotlight of posttransplantation complications. Both direct and associated complications related to CMV need to be considered in understanding the pathogenesis of CMV infection after solid-organ transplantation. New diagnostic methods with higher sensitivity for the detection of CMV and the ability to quantify CMV indicate that low levels of CMV replication are present in many patients who don't have clinical symptoms ascribed to CMV infection. How these low levels of CMV replication impact the outcome of the transplanted graft remains unknown. In addition, there needs to be further study regarding whether only patients at high risk for developing CMV disease or, also, those with clinically asymptomatic levels of CMV replication should be the target of effective preventive regimens. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the pathogenesis of CMV infection after solid-organ transplantation, and it outlines different effective preventive regimens and approaches.

The economic impact of cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

We studied the economic impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its effective reduction with antiviral prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients.

METHOD

Analysis of institutional charge data accumulated during a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing oral acyclovir 800 mg four times daily for 120 days (ACV) and intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days followed by ACV for 106 days (GCV) was performed.

RESULTS

Liver transplant recipients who developed CMV disease had significantly higher charges (median: $148,300) than those who developed asymptomatic CMV infection ($119,600) or experienced no CMV infection ($114,100) (P<0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis indicated that CMV disease is associated with a 49% increase in charges, independent of other factors influencing increased hospitalization charges. In CMV-seronegative patients who received a CMV-seropositive donor organ, GCV prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in charges, as compared to ACV prophylaxis ($113,900 vs. $153,300, respectively; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

CMV disease is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantation. The use of an effective prophylactic antiviral regimen provides savings in health care resources, particularly in patients at high risk for developing CMV disease.

Cost-effectiveness of different strategies of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in orthotopic liver transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients and several different strategies of CMV chemoprophylaxis are in practice. A cost-effective analysis was performed to compare these strategies. A hypothetical cohort of liver transplant recipients was followed up for a year posttransplantation in a Markov model, as they made possible transitions to different states of health with respect to CMV infection and disease. Different strategies of chemoprophylaxis were compared. Cost per patient, yield in terms of gain in quality-adjusted stages, amount of time spent in the state of CMV disease, and CMV-related mortality were the outcome measures compared. Oral ganciclovir administered universally to all transplant recipients was the most favored strategy. Restricting prophylaxis to defined high-risk groups or extending the duration of prophylaxis beyond 3 months did not improve cost-effectiveness. The strategy of short-term, oral ganciclovir-based chemoprophylaxis for CMV in liver transplant recipients is cost-effective by current standards of healthcare interventions.

Recent advances in the therapy and prevention of CMV infections

The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for HIV has had a major impact on the treatment of CMV disease in HIV-infected individuals. There is mounting evidence that in patients with CMV retinitis who have a sustained response to HAART, CMV maintenance treatment can be discontinued without relapse of retinitis. In HAART-naïve individuals with newly diagnosed CMV retinitis, the optimal timing for the initiation of HAART relative to the start of anti-CMV treatment is currently unknown. New local therapies for CMV retinitis (e.g. ganciclovir implant, the new antisense compound fomivirsen) provide treatment options in situations where high local drug delivery is warranted. A treatment algorithm for CMV disease in the HAART era is proposed. In the transplant setting, ganciclovir and foscarnet remain the major compounds used for treatment of CMV disease. In marrow and stem cell transplant recipients, CMV pneumonia still carries a high mortality. Ganciclovir in combination with CMV-specific immunoglobulin or regular intravenous IG remains the treatment of choice for CMV pneumonia; extended antiviral maintenance for several months is recommended in patients with continued immunosuppression. Preemptive treatment based on virologic markers (e.g. pp65 antigenemia, CMV DNA) has been very successful in reducing the incidence of early CMV disease in the transplant setting. The duration of preemptive treatment should be guided by the underlying immunosuppression and virologic markers. Late CMV disease is a challenge in marrow and stem cell transplant recipients, and occurs increasingly in highly immunosuppressed solid organ transplant recipients as well. Recent advances in prophylaxis strategies include oral ganciclovir for liver transplant recipients and valacyclovir for kidney transplant recipients.

New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients

In the past three decades since the inception of human organ transplantation, cytomegalovirus (CMV) has gained increasing clinical import because it is a common pathogen in the immunocompromised transplant recipient. Patients may suffer from severe manifestations of this infection along with the threat of potential fatality. Additionally, the dynamic evolution of immunosuppressive and antiviral agents has brought forth changes in the natural history of CMV infection and disease. Transplant physicians now face the daunting task of recognizing and managing the changing spectrum of CMV infection and its consequences in the organ recipient. For the microbiology laboratory, the emphasis has been geared toward the development of more sophisticated detection assays, including methods to detect emerging antiviral resistance. The discovery of novel antiviral chemotherapy is an important theme of clinical research. Investigations have also focused on preventative measures for CMV disease in the solid-organ transplant population. In all, while much has been achieved in the overall management of CMV infection, the current understanding of CMV pathogenesis and therapy still leaves much to be learned before success can be claimed.

Cytomegalovirus PP65 antigenemia monitoring as a guide for preemptive therapy: a cost effective strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in adult liver transplant recipients, using routine preemptive therapy guided by the pp65 antigenemia test.

METHODS

Antigenemia was monitored weekly after liver transplantation (OLTX) for the first 3 months, and once a month for another 3 months. CMV seronegative recipients were treated preemptively for the first positive antigenemia. Seropositive recipients were treated only when their antigenemia count reached a threshold of > or =100 positive cells per 200,000 leukocytes.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were included between June 1994 and April 1995, of which 137 (95%) were primary OLTX. The percentage of positive antigenemia and CMV disease was 55 and 8%, respectively. Seventy-eight (54%) patients were protocol-monitored for the entire follow-up (group 1) and received appropriate preemptive therapy, although 66 (46%) patients had protocol violation by having missed blood samples or blood drawn at unscheduled times (group 2). Using Cox's proportional hazards model, patients with a first antigenemia count of >11 leukocytes had a significantly higher rate of CMV disease compared to patients with an antigenemia count < or =11 leukocytes (RR = 7.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.2 to 24.5). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjustments were made to control for: group 1 versus group 2, use of OKT3, and serology risk categories. This analysis showed that the relative rate of CMV disease was still significantly higher among patients with antigenemia count >11 leukocytes (adjusted RR = 4.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.3 to 18.1). The estimated cost of preemptive therapy was less than that of prophylaxis with i.v. (14-day course) or oral (90-day course) ganciclovir.

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive therapy guided by pp65 antigenemia is a useful and cost effective strategy for prevention of CMV disease.