Efficacy and safety of lamivudine on replication of recurrent hepatitis B after cadaveric renal transplantation

Lamivudine in the Treatment of HBV-related Liver Disease after Renal Transplantation: An Update

Diminished survival due to hepatitis B has been observed after renal transplantation (RT). Lamivudine, a second-generation nucleoside analogue, has been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with normal renal function. Numerous clinical experiences with lamivudine after RT have been recently published. Despite numerous shortcomings, all of these reports have shown encouraging results. The rate of clearance of HBV viremia ranged between 67% and 100%, and the frequency of ALT normalization was between 50% and 100% with lamivudine use. Even patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, a serious form of HBV-related liver disease with ominous course, have been successfully treated with lamivudine. Lamivudine therapy significantly improved the survival of HBsAg positive renal allograft recipients. However, numerous issues concerning the treatment of hepatitis B after RT remain unclear: the optimal time to initiate lamivudine, the appropriate duration of antiviral therapy after RT, and the role for pre-transplantation liver biopsy. Also, the management of lamivudine resistance remains a concern for physicians. Clinical trials are under way.

[Management of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in chronic kidney failure]

Chronic infections by hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) result in diagnosis and therapeutic issues in dialysis and kidney recipients patients. The exposure to nosocomial, including blood transfusion, risk explains the high prevalence of HBV and HCV infection in this setting. Chronic infection reduces the survival of both patients and allografts, including a specific risk of de novo glomerulonephritis. Cirrhosis was considered as a contra-indication to renal transplantation given the high risk of decompensation and death, questionning the indication of a combined liver and kidney transplantation. Thus, it is mandatory to screen HBV and HCV markers in all dialysis patients, whether or not they are candidates to transplantation. Liver biopsy allows evaluating the severity of the liver disease since the noninvasive markers of fibrosis appear to be less accurate in "renal" patients than in the general population and to better define antiviral therapeutic indications. HCV treatment was mainly based on pegylated interferon α (and low doses of ribavirin), which is contra-indicated in kidney recipients given the risk of graft rejection; HCV treatment is now based on the use of oral direct acting antivirals, which are very potent and well tolerated. HBV replication is now easily suppressed by second-generation nucleos(t)tidic analogues (entecavir and tenofovir), which will be indicated in all the dialysis patients with significant fibrosis (F2,3 or 4 according to the Metavir scoring system) and in any candidate to renal transplantation and to any HBsAg-positive kidney recipients. The best treatment remains preventive by anti-HBV vaccination for HBV and by the respect of universal hygiene rules for HCV.

Successful withdrawal of antiviral treatment in kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B viral infection

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antiviral therapy for kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains unclear. We reported the long-term outcomes after withdrawal of antiviral agent in KTR with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive KTR with antiviral agents between January 2002 and January 2012. Antiviral treatments were withdrawn in patients who met all of the following 7 criteria: (i) no clinical and histologic evidence of cirrhosis, (ii) normal liver biochemistry, (iii) negative for both HBV DNA and hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg), (iv) no resistance to antiviral agent, (v) antiviral therapy > 9 months, (vi) maintenance dosage of immunosuppressant for > 3 months, and (vii) no history of acute rejection during recent 6 months. All patients were followed regularly at approximately 3-6 months for liver enzyme, viral markers, and HBV DNA level after antiviral withdrawal.

RESULTS

Among a total of 445 KTR, 14 HBsAg-positive patients were included in this study. Antiviral agents were used, with lamivudine in 11 patients, and with adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine in 3 patients, respectively. Discontinuation of antiviral agent was attempted in 6 (42.9%) of 14 patients who satisfied the criteria. The median duration of antiviral therapy before withdrawal was 14.3 months (range, 9-24 months). Four (66.7%) of 6 patients were successfully withdrawn and remained negative for HBV DNA for a median 60.5 months (range, 47-82 months). The baseline HBV DNA level was not related to maintenance of remission after withdrawal. Two reactivated patients resumed antiviral treatment immediately, with subsequent normalization of HBV DNA. During the follow-up, 1 patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma; however, no patient death or graft failure was reported for all HBsAg-positive KTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Antiviral therapy can be discontinued successfully and safely in selected KTR with chronic HBV infection, after complete suppression of HBV and sufficient duration of antiviral therapy.

Viral hepatitis in solid organ transplantation other than liver

Transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage organ failure. Hepatitis virus infections, mainly hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections still constitute a major problem because they are common in allograft recipients and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after transplantation. Recently, hepatitis E virus infection has been added as an emergent cause of chronic hepatitis in organ transplantation. The prevalence of HBV and HCV infections has markedly decreased in patients who are candidates for transplantation since the introduction of screening, hygiene and prevention measures, including systematic screening of blood and organ donations, use of erythropoietin, compliance with universal hygiene rules, segregation of HBV-infected patients from non-infected patients and systematic vaccination against HBV. A liver biopsy is preferable to non-invasive biochemical and/or morphological tests of fibrosis to evaluate liver fibrosis before and even after transplantation. Treatment with entecavir or tenofovir is indicated in HBV-infected dialyzed patients who have moderate or severe disease (≥A2 or F2 on the Metavir scale) in preparation for renal transplantation. Due to the risks of severe reactivation, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis or histological deterioration after transplantation, systematic use of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues shortly before or at the time of transplantation is recommended (tenofovir or entecavir are preferable to lamivudine) in all patients, whatever the baseline histological evaluation. In HCV-infected dialyzed patients who are not candidates for renal transplantation, the indication for antiviral therapy is limited to significant fibrosis (fibrosis ≥2 on the Metavir scale). Treatment must be proposed to all candidates for renal transplantation, whatever their baseline histopathology, and interferon-α should be used as monotherapy. After transplantation, interferon-α is contraindicated but may be used in patients for whom the benefits of antiviral treatment clearly outweigh the risks, especially that of allograft rejection. All cirrhotic patients, notably after solid organ transplantation, should be screened for hepatocellular carcinoma. Sustained suppression of necro-inflammation may result in regression of cirrhosis, which in turn may lead to decreased disease-related morbidity and improved survival. Finally, due to the high mortality after renal transplantation, active (namely without sustained viral suppression) cirrhosis should be considered a contraindication to kidney transplantation, but an indication to combined liver-kidney transplantation; on the contrary, inactive (namely with sustained viral suppression) compensated cirrhosis may permit renal transplantation alone. Organ transplantations other than kidney (cardiac or pulmonary transplantations) involve the same diagnosis and therapeutic issues.

Treatment of hepatitis B virus-associated nephropathy

Epidemiological studies have shown a relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and development of proteinuria in some patients (most commonly children), with a predominance for male gender and histological findings of membranous nephropathy on renal biopsy. The presence of immune complexes in the kidney suggests an immune complex basis for the disease, but a direct relation between HBV and membranous nephropathy (or other types of glomerular diseases) remains to be proven. Clearance of HBV antigens, either spontaneous or following antiviral treatments results in improvement in proteinuria. Thus, prompt recognition and specific antiviral treatment are critical in managing patients with HBV and renal involvement. The present review focuses on treatment of HBV with special emphasis given to antiviral therapies, its complications, and dosing in patients with HBV-associated kidney disease.

Long-term add-on therapy with adefovir in lamivudine-resistant kidney graft recipients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of adefovir (ADV) plus lamivudine (LMV) in LMV-resistant (R) kidney transplants with chronic hepatitis B, 11 such patients were treated with add-on ADV.

METHODS

Serum alanine aminotransferase, renal function and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were assessed every 3 months; ADV mutations were searched for by INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay.

RESULTS

During 36 months (12-48), nine patients cleared serum HBV DNA with a 3-year cumulative virological response rate of 88%, without the emergence of ADV mutations. ADV dose was reduced in six patients (55%) showing a decline of creatinine clearance, in the absence of proximal tubulopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

In LMV-R kidney graft recipients, long-term add-on therapy with ADV is efficacious and safe with timely adaptation of ADV dose.

Chronic viral hepatitis in kidney transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in potential kidney transplant candidates-once considered absolute contraindications to kidney transplantation-no longer creates overt barriers to transplantation. Advances in the medical management of HBV and HCV infection have created opportunities for a substantial number of patients to be effectively treated with antiviral therapy before transplantation. For HBV infection, a number of new drugs enable clearance of the virus with minimal adverse effects and drug resistance. Pretransplantation antiviral therapy is advisable for patients with HCV infection, but adverse effects are common and viral eradication remains challenging. Regardless of viral clearance, pretransplant patients without bridging fibrosis (as confirmed by liver biopsy) or clinical stigmata of cirrhosis should be considered for kidney transplantation as survival is superior when compared to treatment with dialysis, and progression of liver disease is unlikely. For patients with advanced liver disease, simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is an important consideration. These treatment advances further increase the burden of organ donor shortage; however, organs from deceased donors with chronic HBV or HCV infection could be efficiently allocated to certain individuals with a viral infection of the same type to increase the pool of available transplant organs.

Long-term outcome of renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection-impact of antiviral treatments

BACKGROUND

Antiviral treatment has improved the short-term outcome of kidney transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection, but its long-term impact, especially in patients who have developed drug resistance, remains uncertain.

METHODS

Sixty-three hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) and 63 HBsAg- patients who have undergone kidney transplantation from 1985 to 2008 were retrospectively reviewed and their clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

With lamivudine as initial treatment, 62% of patients developed drug resistance after 4 years. Lamivudine resistance was associated with a higher incidence of chronic hepatitis but had no significant impact on liver stiffness score or patient survival during follow-up. Salvage treatment with adefovir or entecavir was well tolerated, and resulted in a three-log decrease in hepatitis B deoxynucleic acid after 6 months and normalization of alanine aminotransferase in 75% of patients. The survival rate of HBsAg+ patients transplanted in the recent era of antiviral treatment was 81% at 10 years. Treatment of hepatitis B with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues resulted in significantly improved patient survival (83% vs. 34% at 20 years, P=0.006). Although antiviral treatment was associated with reduced mortality because of liver complications (P=0.036), liver-related deaths still accounted for 40% of mortalities in HBsAg+ patients in the era of antiviral therapies and 22.2% of all deaths that occurred in patients who had received antiviral treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of HBsAg+ renal transplant recipients with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues confers long-term survival benefit, and that rescue therapy with adefovir or entecavir is effective and well tolerated in patients who had developed resistance to lamivudine.

Hepatitis B virus infection and renal transplantation

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), it remains a relevant clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality in long-term follow up. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy as well as assessment of HBV replication in serum (i.e. hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV DNA) is required before transplantation. Interferon should not be used in this setting because of low efficacy and precipitation on acute allograft rejection. The advent of effective antiviral therapies offers the opportunity to prevent the progression of liver disease after renal transplantation. However, as far as we are aware, no studies have compared prophylactic and preemptive strategies. To date, the majority of RTRs with HBV-related liver disease have had a high virological and biochemical response to lamivudine use. However, lamivudine resistance is frequent with a prolonged course of therapy. Considering long-term treatment, antiviral agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance and lack of nephrotoxicity are suggested. The optimal strategy in RTRs with HBV infection remains to be established in the near future.

Management of hepatitis B in special patient populations

Hepatitis B virus is a common cause of acute liver failure. It can be especially problematic in patients coinfected with hepatitis C, hepatitis D or human immunodeficiency virus. In addition, immunosuppression-associated hepatitis B reactivation is being increasingly recognized following chemotherapy, biologic therapy, and organ transplantation. This article highlights treatment options in these special populations.

KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients

The 2009 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline on the monitoring, management, and treatment of kidney transplant recipients is intended to assist the practitioner caring for adults and children after kidney transplantation. The guideline development process followed an evidence-based approach, and management recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant treatment trials. Critical appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The guideline makes recommendations for immunosuppression, graft monitoring, as well as prevention and treatment of infection, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and other complications that are common in kidney transplant recipients, including hematological and bone disorders. Limitations of the evidence, especially on the lack of definitive clinical outcome trials, are discussed and suggestions are provided for future research.

Quartan malaria-associated childhood nephrotic syndrome: now a rare clinical entity in malaria endemic Nigeria

BACKGROUND

The study determined (i) whether or not quartan malaria nephropathy (QMN) is still a major cause of childhood nephrotic syndrome (CNS) in Nigeria, (ii) secondary causes other than QMN and their associated glomerular pathology and (iii) renal and patient outcome.

METHODS

The study was a prospective non-randomized study of consecutive cases of secondary CNS. Patients with idiopathic CNS were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 78 (30.8%) CNS cases were of secondary aetiology. Overall mean ages at onset of secondary CNS aetiology and CNS onset were 8.97 +/- 3.59 (1-15.3) and 9.95 +/- 3.15 (5-15.3) years, respectively. Male (14)/female (10) ratio was 1.4. Secondary causes comprised systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 37.5%), sickle cell anaemia (SCA, 16.7%), hepatitis B virus (HBV, 16.7%) infection, Churg-Strauss syndrome (12.6%), SLE/human immunodeficiency virus infection (4.2%), rhabdomyosarcoma (4.2%), bee stings (4.2%) and Addison's disease (4.2%). The overall cumulative complete remission (CR) rate was 88.0%. Remission was sustained in 11 of 16 (68.8%) CR patients, while one patient (6.25%) relapsed; the remaining four patients (24.95%) were yet to attain sustained remission. Median relapse-free period was 10.5 (0.75-25) months. Cumulative renal survival was 75.2% at 3 years. Three patients were lost to follow-up, while two died. Overall cumulative patient survival probability at 36 months was 90.8%. All patients were followed for a median period of 12.5 (0.11-36.0) months.

CONCLUSION

Overall outcome of CNS has improved significantly compared to the 1960s and 1970s when the poor outcome of QMN was the predominant glomerular lesion in Nigeria. While quartan malaria-associated nephrotic syndrome has become a rare clinical entity, SLE, SCA and HBV infection have become the major secondary aetiologies of CNS in Nigeria.

The incidence and clinical outcome of YMDD mutants in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive renal allograft recipients after prolonged lamivudine therapy

Although lamivudine (LAM) is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV), prolonged therapy may induce the development of LAM-resistant strains, YMDD mutants. Although YMDD mutants have impaired replication that leads to a benign clinical course compared with wild-type virus, some immunosuppressive agents may enhance replication of YMDD mutants, causing a severe hepatitis flare. We retrospectively investigated the incidence and clinical outcomes of YMDD mutants in renal allograft recipients on immunosuppressive treatment. Clinical records of 25 renal allograft recipients, who underwent renal transplantation between December 1997 and February 2006 were hepatitis B surface antigen positive at the time of transplantation, were reviewed. All patients received LAM treatment after renal transplantation. Over 9 to 98 months of follow-up, 16 patients (64.0%) maintained undetectable HBV DNA levels; however, 9 patients (36.0%) showed persistent or increased levels of HBV DNA. Seven were identified as having developed YMDD mutants. Although genotypic analysis was not performed, YMDD mutants were strongly suspected in another two patients, who developed severe hepatic dysfunction combined with high levels of HBV viremia at close to 2 years of LAM therapy. One patient recovered after hepatic transplantation and another patient died of hepatic failure. In conclusion, the incidence of YMDD mutants was similar to that of nonimmunosuppressed individuals; however, the presence of these mutants made it more likely for severe liver disease to develop in renal transplant recipients. Therefore, close monitoring for the development of YMDD mutants should be performed during LAM treatment, especially in this group of patients.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B with lamivudine in renal transplant recipients

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients remains one of the major problems in clinical nephrology. Lamivudine is considered to be a drug of choice for these patients, however, its efficacy in patients with hepatitis B after renal transplantation (RT) has not been completely proven. Twenty-two RT recipients treated with lamivudine were evaluated. The duration of treatment was 15.6+/-1.9 months. Fourteen patients (64%) had normalization of aminotransferase (ALT); in 9 of them (41% of the whole group), serum HBV DNA was eliminated. Serum HBeAg was undetectable in 4 out of 15 (27%) previously positive patients. It has been statistically proven that the efficacy of lamivudine therapy correlates with degree of fibrosis and higher histological activity index values. We could not establish any correlation between the outcome of antiviral therapy and patients' age, sex, conditions of contagion (while on dialysis or after RT), time lapsed after the infection had been detected, duration of post-transplant period, type of immunosuppression, HBeAg positivity or negativity, ALT levels, concomitant HCV infection. The efficacy of antiviral HBV therapy is limited by the duration of lamivudine treatment: in 4 out of 5 patients with virologic response, the viremia condition relapsed several weeks after the medication had been stopped. Two patients continued to sustain their biochemical response and 1 patient had ALT levels elevated to above normal, but the value was almost twice as low as initially reported. Liver biopsy was repeated in 4 RT recipients after the end of antiviral therapy; in 3 of them positive morphologic changes were observed.

Discontinuation of lamivudine treatment for hepatitis flare after kidney or heart transplantation in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients: A retrospective case series

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the clinical course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after discontinuation of lamivudine prescribed for kidney or heart posttransplantation hepatitis flare

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for discontinuation, subsequent reappearance of HBV DNA, and mortality in heart and kidney transplant recipients who discontinued lamivudine treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective case series followed up male and female hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive Taiwanese transplant recipients from the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, between July 1989 and January 1999. Biochemical, virologic, and serologic parameters and liver-related mortality of patients who discontinued lamivudine 100 mg QD prescribed for posttransplantation hepatitis flare were compared with those in a group of patients who continued use of lamivudine administered for the same indication over the same period of time. Serum HBV DNA levels were checked in all patients before and after discontinuation of lamivudine, and after resumption of lamivudine treatment and in patients with breakthrough hepatitis flare.

RESULTS

A total of 39 HBsAg-positive transplant recipients (mean [SD] age, 45 [10.0] years) were identified during regular follow-up visits. Nine patients discontinued lamivudine use; 11 patients who continued it were selected as a control group. No significant between-group differences were observed in mean (SD) age (46 [14.0] vs 45 [6.9] years), sex (men/women,vs 1), type of transplant received (heart/kidney,vs ), or pretransplantation liver function test results. The reasons for discontinuation were informed patient decision (4 patients); YMDD mutation (2); self-discontinuation without physician consultation (2); and pregnancy (1). Of those who discontinued lamivudine, serum HBV DNA was undetectable at a mean of 30 (range, 9-47) months' follow-up in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients. Lamivudine treatment was resumed in 3 patients on reappearance of HBV DNA, and a subsequent rapid decline in the serum HBV DNA was observed. The liver-related mortality rate was not significantly higher in patients who discontinued treatment compared with continuously treated patients (both, 0%). The between-group difference in overall mortality rates was not significant (22.2% and 18.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This case series illustrated a variety of clinical situations in which discontinuation of lamivudine treatment prescribed for posttransplantation hepatitis flare may occur. However, liver-related mortality was not increased in these patients compared with those who continued lamivudine treatment.

Hepatitis B treatment: Lessons for the nephrologist

Hepatitis B affects approximately 350 million people worldwide, and an estimated 1.25 million people in the United States. Although most people infected with the virus do not develop significant hepatic disease from hepatitis B, 15-40% will develop serious complications. These complications include cirrhosis, the development of hepatocellular carcinoma , and hepatic decompensation. Patients with renal failure have increased risk of acquiring the virus through blood transfusions and contact with bodily fluids at hemodialysis centers, and of developing complications from hepatitis B virus infection. Renal transplant patients are at increased risk for exacerbations of hepatitis B with immunosuppression. Thus, it is crucial for the nephrologist to have a clear understanding of the natural history and treatment of hepatitis B, both pre- and post-renal transplant.

Lamivudine therapy in kidney allograft recipients who are seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen

BACKGROUND

There are numerous recent reports on the use of lamivudine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation. However, the optimal strategy (prophylactic, preemptive, or salvage approach) for starting lamivudine treatment in this patient group has not been determined. The aim of this study was to assess how the timing of lamivudine therapy affected the HBV serological status and the transaminase levels in renal allograft recipients with chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

We investigated outcomes for patients who were seropositive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and underwent transplantation before or after October 2004 (the date our institution implemented a prophylactic lamivudine treatment strategy against HBV). The data included serum liver enzyme levels and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening results for HBV-DNA in serum.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients (11 before October 2004, four after October 2004) were included in the study. Preoperatively all patients had normal transaminases levels and 2 of 15 patients had detectable HBV-DNA on PCR. Eight of the 15 total HBsAg-positive patients in our series were not placed on lamivudine at the time of renal transplantation. Half of those who were not treated initially showed transaminase elevations in the first year of follow-up requiring lamivudine therapy at that time. In contrast, all seven individuals who received lamivudine at the time of transplantation were negative for HBV-DNA throughout the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

To prevent viral replication in HBsAg-positive patients who are scheduled for renal transplantation, it is best to initiate lamivudine therapy before or immediately after transplantation.

Reactivation of hepatitis and lamivudine therapy in 11 HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients: a single centre experience

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) renal allograft recipients, the mortality associated with liver disease reaches 37-78%. An antiviral agent, lamivudine, has recently been reported to be safe and effective for preventing hepatic damage in these patients, although either resurgence of HBV-DNA levels after discontinuation or emerging resistant HBV mutants caused by long-term administration are still unsettled.

METHODS

Between July 1976 and December 2003, 555 renal transplantations were performed in our centre. Of these, 11 patients who were HBsAg (+) at the time of transplantation (2.0%) were selected for this study. We investigated the incidence of hepatitis reactivation for three yr after transplantation and their clinical courses, including the efficacy of lamivudine therapy in seven of the 11 patients.

RESULTS

Six episodes of hepatitis reactivation developed in five of the 11 patients (45.5%) within three yr after transplantation. Five episodes of six occurred within four months after transplantation. The patient who underwent the most severe reactivation needed intensive care including lamivudine administration and plasma exchange. Lamivudine caused no severe adverse effects and HBV-DNA levels dropped to under measurable levels within four months after lamivudine administration in all patients. Resistant HBV mutant emerged in only one patient, who had the longest lamivudine administration of 49 months.

CONCLUSIONS

For HBsAg (+) renal allograft recipients, careful monitoring of HBV-DNA levels and timely administration of lamivudine could prevent hepatic damage caused by reactivation of hepatitis.

Heart Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Clinical Evolution, Molecular Analysis, and Effect of Treatment

We evaluated clinical evolution and hepatitis B virus (HBV) molecular changes in heart recipients with chronic HBV infection before transplantation, and studied the effects of lamivudine treatment in patients who experienced HBV reactivation. Nine patients with chronic HBV infection who underwent heart transplantation were investigated. HBV surface/core-promoter/precore/core regions were sequenced. Prior to transplantation, all nine patients had consistently normal ALT and low HBV-DNA levels. Seven experienced HBV reactivation after transplantation (ALT elevated, HBV-DNA>200.000 cps/ml). Lamivudine treatment was initially effective in all patients; three patients during the second year of treatment developed lamivudine resistance-associated mutations (rt-L180M, rt-M204V) with severe disease reactivation, remitted after switch to adefovir treatment. No other significant HBV mutations were identified in the genomic regions studied. Immune suppression is crucial in the reactivation of previous inactive HBV infection and in the liver disease progression in heart recipients. Preemptive lamivudine treatment could be useful in the early management of these patients.

Long-Term Lamivudine Monotherapy in Renal-Transplant Recipients with Hepatitis-B-Related Cirrhosis

Background

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal-transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of long-term lamivudine monotherapy in renal-transplant recipients with HBV-related cirrhosis.

Methods

Seventeen such patients [median age: 45 years; 7 with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)] received daily oral doses of 75–150 mg lamivudine for a median of 48 (range 11–81) months. All patients had baseline serum levels of HBV DNA of over 6 log copies per ml and of 10 alanine transaminase (ALT) of over 1.5 times the upper normal limit (UNL). Clinical lamivudine resistance was defined as a rebound of serum HBV DNA above 5.3 log 10 copies per ml and of serum ALT of over 1.5 times the UNL in patients who initially responded with HBV DNA levels of less than 5.3 log copies per ml and normal ALT 10 values. Controls were 14 renal-transplant patients (median age 44 years; 3 with HBeAg) with HBV-related cirrhosis, naive to any anti-HBV therapy, followed for 58 months (4–135).

Results

Thirteen (77%) treated patients had a persistent response throughout the study period, including three (18%) who developed genotypic resistance, compared with none of the untreated controls (77% versus 0%, P<0.0001). Four (23%) developed clinical resistance. Two of three patients with initially decompensated cirrhosis had a durable response and clinical improvement compared with the transient responder, whose liver function worsened following lamivudine resistance. Two responders developed chronic rejection requiring chronic haemodialysis. Overall, one treated patient developed liver-related complications, compared with eight untreated controls (6% versus 57%, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Most renal-transplant patients treated with lamivudine achieved a rapid and durable suppression of HBV, which substantially lowered the risk of liver decompensation and death.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.

Effects of long-term lamivudine therapy in renal-transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Following renal transplantation (RT), chronic immunosuppression is associated in hepatitis B virus (HBV) (+) patients with a flare-up of the disease, which might be harmful in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

We report on the effect of long-term lamivudine therapy given at an initial daily dose of 100mg in 18 HBV (+) RT patients.

RESULTS

When lamivudine therapy was commenced, 14 patients (77%) had an increase in their aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferase levels. During a mean follow-up, under treatment, of 36.5 +/- 3.5 months (up to 66 months), 10 patients (55%) had a sustained partial (HBV DNA < 4 x 10(5)copies/ml) (n = 4) or complete (HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml) (n = 6) virological response. Overall, 12 virological breakthroughs were observed. Of those who were HBe Ag(+) prior to lamivudine therapy (n = 4), one seroconverted to HBe Ab during therapy. At the last follow-up, AST and ALT levels were normal in 13 patients. When liver biopsy was repeated during treatment (n = 15), the virological responders showed a significant decrease in total Knodell score from 10 +/- 0.6 to 7 +/- 1 (P = 0.04), but no significant change in the stage of fibrosis. Conversely, in those patients with high HBV DNA titers, there were no significant changes in the total Knodell score or in the grade of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, lamivudine therapy is safe in HBV(+)ve renal-transplant patients. However, even if the full and partial virological response rates are still high (55%) in the long term, relapse or primary non-responses occur. The implementation of alternative efficient strategies is warranted.

Long-term therapy with lamivudine in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. As other available HBV therapies, its efficacy is hampered by relapse after discontinuation and by the risk of viral breakthrough. A recent study suggests that pre-emptive lamivudine therapy improves survival in HBV renal transplants, but few data are available regarding its long-term use in this population. The clinical features, course and viral mutations associated with the emergence of viral resistance in this population have not been well studied.

METHODS

We followed 14 consecutive renal transplant patients treated with lamivudine for chronic hepatitis B. Breakthrough was defined as the reappearance of HBV DNA by hybridization. In patients with breakthrough, lamivudine was always continued and patients were followed up monthly. Mutations associated with viral resistance were determined by sequencing the polymerase encoding gene at the beginning of treatment and at the time of breakthrough.

RESULTS

The median duration of treatment was 64.5 months. Resistance to lamivudine appeared in eight patients (57%) after a median duration of treatment of 15 (9-24) months. During a 51 month follow-up after breakthrough, only three of eight patients had a flare-up with alanine aminotransferase levels more than 5 ULN, and no hepatic decompensation was observed. Analysis of HBV sequencing after breakthrough revealed specific resistance mutations in both the B and C domains of the polymerase (rtL180M/M204V, n = 5; rtM204I, n = 2).

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine is a safe and effective treatment of active hepatitis B in renal transplant patients. Resistance to treatment is frequent but seems to have little clinical impact over the considered period. In our experience, the YMDD mutation accounts for most cases of virological escape in patients with good compliance.

Lamivudine therapy for chronic hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients

Chronic liver disease due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Administration of immunosuppressive drugs facilitates viral replication and may lead to increased frequency of progressive chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic HBV infection adversely affects both patient and graft survival. Because of increased risk of death HBV-seropositive renal graft recipients require prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B. Interferon due to its immunomodulating effects, risk of activation of rejection is not recommended for transplant recipients. Lamivudine seems to be efficacious and useful for treating hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients. The main disadvantages of lamivudine are relapse after withdrawal of the agent and emergence of lamivudine resistant strains due to mutations in the YMDD locus of the HBV polymerase gene during prolonged lamivudine therapy. Optimal lamivudine treatment regimen for HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients should be defined. It seems better to initiate lamivudine therapy before or immediately after transplantation to prevent viral replication. The clinical course of hepatitis in most patients with lamivudine resistant HBV mutants seems relatively benign and long-term resistance was well tolerated. Discontinuation of lamivudine in order to minimize the emergence of drug resistant HBV mutants is safe in selected groups of patients. Lamivudine therapy has become the treatment of choice in HBV positive renal transplant recipients and improves prognosis and outcome of infected patients.

Treatments for hepatitis B

New optimism surrounds treatments for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Interferon- alpha , lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil are currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CHB. All 3 treatments possess unique characteristics with respect to their side effect profiles, potencies, and treatment niches within the spectrum of CHB. New agents, which are in various stages of clinical development, represent potential improvements within existing, as well as novel, classes of antiviral therapy, and they offer significant promise of a cure for the many patients with chronic and progressive hepatitis B. However, there remain many challenges in understanding the implications of drug resistance, the role of combination therapy, and how to define the response to therapy within subsets of patients with hepatitis B.

Prospective study on lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B in renal allograft recipients

The natural history of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in renal transplant recipients (RTx) is unclear, despite its increasing incidence. Twenty-nine HBsAg-positive RTx with rising HBV DNA received lamivudine therapy. The course of lamivudine-resistant HBV infection was studied prospectively. During 68.7 +/- 12.5 months of follow-up, 14 (48.3%) patients developed lamivudine resistance, at 10-35 months (mean 16.9 +/- 7.0). All showed mutant sequences at codons 552 and 528 of the YMDD motif, while 13 patients demonstrated wild-type sequence at codon 555. Lamivudine resistance was unrelated to patient demographics, HBeAg status/sero-conversion, or genotype. Following resistance, HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase showed an initial increase followed by spontaneous gradual reduction. The subsequent peak HBV DNA was lower (1.26 +/- 1.09 x 10(9) vs. 6.26 +/- 12.23 x 10(9) copies/mL, p = 0.011), while that of alanine aminotransferase was higher (196 +/- 117 vs. 77 +/- 47 imicro/l, p = 0.005), compared with pretreatment levels. Post-resistance hepatitic flare occurred in 11 (78.6%) patients. This was transient in four (36.4%), but became chronic in six (54.5%) patients. Decompensation was noted in one patient during this flare, but all survived. We conclude that drug resistance is prevalent in lamivudine-treated RTx. Despite a lower ensuing peak viremia compared with baseline, hepatitic flare is common. While most patients have spontaneous resolution, a minority may develop potentially fatal decompensation during the preceding exacerbation.

Cadaveric renal transplantation in hepatitis B antigen–positive recipients using hepatitis B antigen–positive donor organs with lamivudine treatment

Although renal transplantation has been regarded as the best renal replacement therapy in end-stage renal disease patients, there have never been enough organ donors. Therefore, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients are often given priority over HBsAg-positive patients. We performed cadaveric renal transplantation in six HBsAg-positive recipients given HBsAg-positive donor organs who were on lamivudine treatment. Donors were found to have normal renal function by serum and urine laboratory tests. All recipients underwent liver biopsies before transplantation; those with liver cirrhosis were excluded. All recipients were treated with 100 mg lamivudine once daily because of positive titers of hepatitis B viral (HBV) DNA (three patients), and increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (three patients). During the follow-up period, one patient died from hepatic failure at 50 months after transplantation without deterioration of graft function. The remaining five patients showed sustained normal ALT levels. Decreases in HBV DNA titer were observed among patients who were positive before transplantation, but did not reverse to negative. Acute rejection developed in two patients: one was treated successfully with steroid pulse therapy, and the other had two bouts of acute rejection within a 33-month interval. The first was successfully treated with steroid pulse therapy, but the second failed. The four remaining patients have maintained normal renal function for a considerable time. HBsAg-positive donor organs must be used carefully in renal transplantation of HBsAg-positive recipients.

Lamivudine for the treatment of hepatitis B virus-related liver disease after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Numerous reports have appeared on lamivudine use for the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after renal transplantation (RT). However, the efficacy and safety of lamivudine after RT remain unclear.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of initial lamivudine monotherapy in RT recipients with hepatitis B by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical trials. The primary outcomes were hepatitis B (HB) e antigen (Ag) and HBV-DNA clearance (as measures of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were biochemical response (as measures of efficacy), dropout rate, and lamivudine resistance (as measures of tolerability). The authors used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, and outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

The authors identified 14 clinical trials (184 patients); all of these were prospective cohort studies. The mean overall estimate for HBV-DNA and HBeAg clearance, alanine aminotransferase normalization, and lamivudine resistance was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86%-96%), 27% (95% CI, 16%-39%), 81% (95% CI, 70%-92%), and 18% (95% CI, 10%-37%), respectively. HBeAg seroconversion rate was assessed in four (28%) trials and ranged between 0% and 46%. The P value was greater than 0.05 for our test of study homogeneity. There was no association between rate of patients who were male patients or had cirrhosis, race, age, lamivudine dose, and HBV-DNA or HBeAg clearance. Increased duration of lamivudine therapy was positively associated with frequency of HBeAg loss (r =0.51, P =0.039) and lamivudine resistance (r =0.620, P =0.019). Only 2 (14%) of 14 studies reported a dropout rate greater than 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that the majority of RT recipients with hepatitis B had high virologic and biochemical response with lamivudine. Tolerance to lamivudine was good. However, lamivudine resistance was frequent with prolonged therapy, potentially limiting its long-term efficacy after RT.

Use of prophylactic lamivudine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection

Chronic HBsAg carriers are known to have a higher risk of hepatitis-related mortality and morbidity when undergoing kidney transplantation. Immunosuppressants might flare up the infection that could be fulminating. Lamivudine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to be effective in inhibiting replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV). With these two drugs, hepatitis related adverse outcome might be preventable when these patients are being transplanted. Four Chinese adolescents with chronic HBV infection were transplanted in our Department from 1999 to 2001. Immunosuppresants included prednisolone, cyclosporin A and MMF; azathioprine was not used for its potentially liver toxic effect. Prophylactic lamivudine 3 mg/kg and maximum 100 mg daily was given just before transplantation and was continued afterwards. HBV status and liver enzymes were monitored serially. Patients were followed up for 26.0 +/- 10.3 (11-34) months post-transplant and no mortality was reported. All grafts were functioning and no rejection was noted. MMF and lamivudine were well tolerated. Alanine transaminase was only transiently elevated in the first 2 months post-transplant in all patients and became normal afterwards. The patients were clinically well and liver function was normal at the last follow-up. However, HBV DNA became positive in three patients after the transplantation. YMDD mutant HBV was negative in one patient and undeterminable in the other three due to low virus load. In summary, with prophylactic lamivudine and MMF, short-term follow-up showed that renal transplant might be feasible and safe in chronic HBV carriers.

Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive kidney transplant recipients have increased liver-related mortality. The impact of lamivudine treatment on patient survival, the optimal time to start treatment, and the feasibility of discontinuing treatment have not been determined. This study examined these issues with a novel management protocol. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were measured serially in HBsAg-positive kidney transplant recipients, and lamivudine was administered preemptively to patients with increasing HBV DNA levels with or without elevation of aminotransferase levels. Outcomes of patients who underwent transplantation before or after institution of this preemptive management strategy (in January 1996) were compared. Eleven de novo patients (91.7%) who underwent transplantation between 1996 and 2000 and 15 existing patients (39.5%) who underwent transplantation between 1983 and 1995 received preemptive lamivudine therapy for 32.6 +/- 13.3 months. The treatment criteria were met by de novo patients at 8.4 +/- 6.2 months (range, 1-18 months) after transplantation. Suppression of HBV DNA and normalization of aminotransferase levels were achieved in all treated patients, and 21.4% had hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion. The survival of preemptively managed de novo transplant patients was similar to that of HBsAg-negative controls, whereas HBsAg-positive patients who underwent transplantation before January 1996 had inferior survival (relative risk of death, 9.7 [P <.001]; relative risk of liver-related mortality, 68.0 [P <.0001]). Eleven patients (40.7%) developed lamivudine resistance. Discontinuation of lamivudine was attempted in 12 low-risk patients after stabilization and was successful in 5 (41.7%). In conclusion, preemptive lamivudine therapy based on serial HBV DNA levels and clinical monitoring improved the survival of HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients. Treatment can be discontinued safely in selected patients after stabilization to minimize the selection of drug-resistant HBV mutants.

Pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates

Kidney transplantation should be strongly considered for all medically suitable patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Improvements in outcomes after renal transplantation have resulted in a more liberal selection of patients. High-risk category patients including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive, highly sensitized patients, T-cell positive cross-match, and ABO blood group-incompatible patients are now considered potential renal transplant candidates. Unfortunately, the demand for kidney transplants far exceeds the supply of available organs, causing a persistent increase in the number of patients on the waiting list with a parallel increase in the waiting time for a cadaveric kidney transplant. This has 2 major consequences. First, patients on the waiting list are getting sicker and older. Second, living donors have assumed increasing importance in renal transplantation. Pre-existing morbidities including malignancies, cardiovascular disease, infections, and coagulopathies should be extensively evaluated before proceeding to transplantation. Special attention should be given to cardiovascular risk factors because the leading cause of death after renal transplant is cardiovascular disease. A full immunologic evaluation with ABO blood group determination, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, screening for antibody to HLA phenotypes, and cross-matching need to be gathered before transplantation to avoid antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection or to proceed with specific protocols in highly sensitized or in positive T-cell cross-match patients. With the increased rate of donation from living donors, regular follow-up evaluation of kidney donors is recommended to detect hypertension or proteinuria in those who may develop it.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis before and after renal transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is present in 2-50% of renal transplant recipients and patients receiving hemodialysis. Renal transplantation confers an overall survival benefit in HCV positive (HCV+) hemodialysis patients, with similar 5-year patient and graft survival to those without HCV infection. However, longer-term studies have reported increased liver-related mortality in HCV-infected recipients. Unfortunately, attempts to eradicate HCV infection before transplant have been disappointing. Interferon is poorly tolerated in-patients with end-stage renal disease and ribavirin is contraindicated because reduced renal clearance results in severe hemolysis. Antiviral therapy following renal transplantation is also poorly tolerated, because of interferon-induced rejection and graft loss. Although the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in hemodialysis patients and renal transplant recipients since the introduction of routine vaccination and other infection control measures, it remains high within countries with endemic HBV infection (especially Asia-Pacific and Africa). Renal transplantation is associated with reduced survival in HBsAg+ hemodialysis patients. Unlike interferon, lamivudine is a safe and effective antiviral HBV treatment both before and after renal transplantation. Lamivudine therapy commenced at transplantation should prevent early posttransplant reactivation and subsequent progression to cirrhosis and late liver failure. This preemptive therapy should also eradicate early liver failure from fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Because cessation of treatment may lead to severe lamivudine-withdrawal hepatitis, most patients require long-term therapy. The development of lamivudine-resistance will be accelerated by immunosuppression and may result in severe hepatitis flares with decompensation. Regular monitoring with liver function tests and HBV DNA measurements should enable early detection and rescue with adefovir. Chronic HCV and HBV infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The best predictor for liver mortality is advanced liver disease at the time of transplant, and liver biopsy should be considered in all potential HBsAg+ or HCV+ renal transplant candidates without clinical or radiologic evidence of cirrhosis. Established cirrhosis with active viral infection should be considered a relative contraindication to isolated renal transplantation.

Limited efficacy of lamivudine against hepatitis B virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major complication when HBV carriers receive immunosuppressive therapy. Recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) carry the highest risk of fatal HBV disease (up to 12%).

METHODS

In an attempt to identify a suitable procedure for the prevention and management of HBV reactivation, the administration of lamivudine over the course was tested in two patients.

RESULTS

Generally, the patients transplant courses were successfully managed despite their difficult clinical situations: a high HBV load before transplant in one patient and intense steroid therapy for complicated acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the other patient. However, one patient showed a reactivation of HBV after discontinuing lamivudine and the other showed persistently high DNA polymerase activity despite prolonged administration of lamivudine.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that lamivudine could have a place in the management of patients who suffer from chronic HBV infection and who are undergoing allogeneic HSCT. However, the efficacy of lamivudine seemed to be limited compared with other settings, including solid organ transplantation and autologous HSCT.

Lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B in renal transplantation

Antiviral therapies are associated with an increased risk of acute rejection in transplant patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in renal transplant patients. Six patients were included in this study. They received 150 mg/day of lamivudine during a follow-up period of 24 months. The laboratory tests monitored were HBV DNA, HBsAg, HBeAg, ALT, gamma-GT, serum creatinine and blood cyclosporine levels. The HBV DNA became undetectable in four patients as early as in the third month of treatment. After six months, the viral load was also negative in the other two patients, and remained so until 18 months of follow-up. The medication was well tolerated with no major side effects. Lamivudine was safe and effective in blocking HBV replication in renal transplant patients without any apparent increase in the risk of graft failure for the 24-month period of study.

Efficacy of famciclovir in the treatment of lamivudine resistance related to an atypical hepatitis B virus mutant

Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after renal transplantation. Although lamivudine is an effective treatment for chronic hepatitis B, the development of drug resistance due to mutations in the tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) motif is a major concern, especially in immunosuppressed patients who require prolonged therapy. Treatment with famciclovir has not been effective in the majority of patients who developed lamivudine resistance due to methionine-to-valine mutation at position 550, because this mutation has been uniformly associated with leucine-to-methionine mutation at position 526, a mutation that is associated with resistance to famciclovir. We describe a renal transplant recipient with an uncommon lamivudine-resistant HBV variant, in which methionine-to-valine/isoleucine mutation at position 550 was associated with wild-type sequence at position 526. The severe hepatitic flare consequent to the lamivudine resistance in this patient was successfully treated with famciclovir, indicating that both M550V and M550I mutants with preserved wild-type sequence at position 526 of HBV reverse transcriptase are susceptible to famciclovir. Our experience shows that famciclovir can be useful in selected patients with otherwise potentially fatal hepatitic flares related to lamivudine resistance, and that analysis of mutations in the HBV variant can be helpful in the choice of antiviral therapy.