Histological features predictive of recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Preventive administration of UDCA after liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis is associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) is not rare and can occasionally lead to severe graft dysfunction and retransplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective treatment for PBC. However, whether preventive administration of UDCA after LT could lower the incidence of PBC recurrence is unknown.

METHODS

Patients transplanted for PBC in five French and Swiss centers from 1988 to 2010 were included. Most patients from a single center received UDCA (10-15 mg/kg/d) preventively. Recurrence of PBC was histologically defined from biopsies routinely performed at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up, and at any time when clinically indicated.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients with a 1-year minimum follow-up were studied retrospectively, including 19 (21%) patients receiving preventive UDCA. The mean follow-up was 12 years. Recurrence was diagnosed in 48 (53%) patients. The recurrence rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 27%, 47%, and 61%, respectively. In a multivariate proportional hazards model adjusted for potential confounders and risk factors, preventive UDCA was the only factor affecting the risk of recurrence significantly (HR=0.32; 95% CI: 0.11-0.91). The 5, 10, and 15-year rates of recurrence were 11%, 21%, and 40%, respectively, under preventive UDCA, and 32%, 53%, and 70%, respectively, without preventive UDCA. Seven patients with recurrence (15%) progressed to cirrhosis, requiring retransplantation in one. However, neither recurrence nor preventive UDCA had a significant impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Preventive treatment with UDCA reduces the risk of PBC recurrence after LT.

Liver Transplant Pathology: Review of Challenging Diagnostic Situations

Histopathologic assessment of allograft liver biopsies has an important role in managing patients who have undergone liver transplantation. In this review, several topics are discussed that create diagnostic problems in transplant pathology, with emphasis on pathologic features and differential diagnosis. The topics discussed are acute cellular rejection, late acute rejection (centrizonal/parenchymal rejection), chronic rejection, plasma cell hepatitis, idiopathic posttransplant chronic hepatitis, fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, selected viral infections (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and hepatitis E), and acute antibody-mediated rejection.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and liver transplantation

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic progressive inflammatory liver disease, predominantly affecting middle-aged women, characterized by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs), which can lead to liver failure. Genetic contributions, environmental factors including chemical and infectious xenobiotics, autoimmunity and loss of tolerance have been aggressively investigated in the pathogenesis of PBC, however, the actual impact of these factors is still controversial. Survival of PBC patients has been largely improved with the widespread use of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), however, one third of patients still do not respond to the treatment and proceed to liver cirrhosis, requiring liver transplantation as a last resort for cure. The outcome of liver transplantation is excellent with 5- and 10-year survival rates around 80% and 70%, respectively, while along with long survival, the recurrence of the disease has become an important outcome after liver transplantation. Prevalence rates of recurrent PBC rage widely between 1% and 35%, and seem to increase with longer follow-up. Center-specific issues, especially the use of protocol biopsy, affect the variety of incidence, yet, recurrence itself does not affect patient and graft survival at present, and retransplantation due to recurrent disease is extremely rare. With a longer follow-up, recurrent disease could have an impact on patient and graft survival.

Recurrent and de novo autoimmune liver diseases

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) each account for approximately 5% of liver transplants per year performed in the United States and Europe. Even though outcomes are excellent, with reported 5-year patient and graft survival exceeding 90% and 80%, 80% and 75%, 72% and 65% for PBC, PSC, and AIH, respectively, the issue of recurrent autoimmune liver disease after orthotopic liver transplantation is increasingly recognized as a cause of graft dysfunction, death, and need for retransplantation. This article reviews diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of recurrent PBC, PSC, and AIH after liver transplantation.

Long-term outcome of living donor liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), the majority of donors are genetically related to their recipients, leading to concerns of an earlier recurrence of PBC and a poorer prognosis due to genetic susceptibility. Totally 81 patients who underwent LDLT for PBC were the subjects of the present study. Immunosuppressive agents consisted of tacrolimus and methylprednisolone. In the outpatient clinic, when the aspartate and alanine aminotransferase level exceeded the upper limit of the normal range, the dose of methylprednisolone was increased from 4 to 6 mg/day for several months. Blood was examined every 2 weeks for 3 months and a liver biopsy was performed when aminotransferase levels did not decrease to the upper limit of the normal range after more than 3 months. Five-year survival and recurrence rates were estimated and the prognostic factors were analyzed. The mean observation period was 6.2 years. Five years after LDLT for PBC, the biopsy-proven PBC recurrence rate was 1%. The 5-year patient survival rate was 80%. The nonrelated or blood-related donor factor and number of human leukocyte antigen matches did not correlate with prognosis. PBC recurrence rate after LDLT in our series was lower than that in previous studies.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

Liver transplantation in PBC and PSC: indications and disease recurrence

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represent major indications for liver transplantation (LT). Despite the steady increase in the incidence and prevalence of PBC, the number of liver transplants for PBC has fallen in recent years, whereas the number of transplants for PSC has remained stable. Indications for LT for PBC and PSC are no different from those of other causes of chronic liver disease, apart from some disease-specific indications. PBC and PSC have more favourable outcomes after LT, compared to viral hepatitis and alcohol-associated liver disease. Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that PBC and PSC recur after LT. The diagnosis of recurrent disease should be made on agreed criteria. The impact of recurrent disease on survival is unclear. Study of recurrent PBC and PSC may provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of these diseases in the native liver.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an important clinical outcome after liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients. Prevalence rates for recurrent PBC (rPBC) reported by individual LT programs range between 9% and 35%. The diagnostic hallmark of rPBC is histologic identification of granulomatous changes. Clinical and biochemical features are frequently absent with rPBC and cannot be used alone for diagnostic purposes. Some of the risk factors of rPBC may include recipient factors such as age, gender, HLA status and immunosuppression, as well as donor factors such as age, gender and ischemic time, although controversy exists. Most patients have early stage disease at the time of diagnosis, and there may be a role for therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. While short- and medium-term outcomes remain favorable, especially if compared to patients transplanted for other indications, continued follow-up may identify reduced long-term graft and patient survival.

Recurrence of autoimmune disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

1. Recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis. a Five percent of liver transplants are performed because of end-stage liver disease secondary to primary sclerosing cholangitis. b Recurrent disease affects 10% to 27% of recipients. c Diagnostic criteria of recurrence include the following: A confirmed diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis before liver transplantation. A cholangiogram showing nonanastomotic biliary strictures with beading and irregularity occurring 90 days after transplantation. Liver biopsy revealing fibrous cholangitis and/or fibro-obliterative lesions of large bile ducts. d The data argue for an association between recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis and rejection and steroid therapy. 2. Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis. a Overall recurrence rates can reach 50%. b The gold standard for diagnosis is histological, with bile duct destruction by granulomas indicated by a florid lesion. c Anti-mitochondrial antibody is not a reliable marker of recurrence. d Recurrence does not affect long-term patient or graft survival. 3. Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis. a Recurrence affects approximately 25% of liver allografts during the first 5 years after liver transplantation and more than 50% after 10 years of follow-up. b Diagnostic criteria of recurrence must include a combination of biochemical changes, (elevated serum aminotransferases levels and hypergammaglobulinemia), histological features of autoimmune hepatitis, and steroid dependency. c Immunosuppressive therapy should be pursued even if liver test results are normal.

Late protocol liver biopsies in the liver allograft: a neglected investigation?

As outcomes from liver transplantation have improved, attention has focused on long-term outcomes: patient and graft survival is affected by many factors, including the consequences of both overimmunosuppression (eg, renal failure and cancer) and underimmunosuppression (eg, rejection). The use of protocol (rather than event-driven) biopsies of the liver allograft, except for those grafted for HCV infection, has been largely abandoned. The aim of this study was to determine if protocol biopsies can improve the management of liver allograft recipients. A retrospective analysis of liver allograft recipients who had undergone protocol liver biopsies between 2000 and 2006 was performed. One hundred seventy-eight patients with normal liver tests (alcoholic liver disease, 49; autoimmune hepatitis, 20; and primary biliary cirrhosis, 107) who had undergone 235 protocol biopsies were identified. No significant complication from the biopsy was recorded. Liver histology was reported as normal or nearly normal in only 57 (24%). Chronic hepatitis (not obviously related to disease recurrence) was present in 78 (33%). Interpreted in the light of the calculated creatinine clearance, the biopsy findings indicated that overall immunosuppression (IMS) should be maintained or increased with standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based IMS in 25% of cases, that overall IMS should be reduced in 15% of cases, and that overall IMS should be maintained or increased by the substitution of non-nephrotoxic agents for CNIs in 9% of cases. The histological findings led to a documented change in IMS in 76 (32%) (increased IMS, 11; decreased IMS, 58; and switch from CNI, 7). In conclusion, protocol liver biopsy provides important histological information about graft function that is not available from standard liver tests and safely allows modification of IMS to ensure that long-term side effects of drug therapy (eg, renal failure) are minimized while graft function is sustained. Liver Transpl 15:931-938, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Long-term survival and impact of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

The recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) in the hepatic allograft may impact patient and graft survival with long-term follow-up. The efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for treatment of recurrent PBC after liver transplantation (LT) remains less well known. The aims of this study were as follows: 1) to determine the significance of recurrent PBC on overall survival among PBC patients who underwent LT, and 2) to determine the efficacy of UDCA treatment after LT in patients with recurrent PBC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 154 PBC patients who underwent LT with at least 1 yr of follow-up after transplantation from 1985 through 2005. A total of 52 patients with recurrent PBC were identified. After adjusting for age and gender, recurrent PBC was not associated with death or liver retransplantation (hazard ratio, 0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.41-2.31; P = 0.9). A total of 38 patients with recurrent PBC received UDCA at an average dose of 12 mg/kg/day for a mean duration of 55 months. Over a 36-month period, an estimated 52% of UDCA-treated patients experienced normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase and alanine aminotransferase compared to 22% of untreated patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of histological progression between subgroups. UDCA did not influence patient and graft survival. In conclusion, the development of recurrent PBC has little impact on long-term survival or need for retransplantation. While UDCA therapy is associated with biochemical improvement, its role in delaying histologic progression remains unknown. In this short period of treatment, UDCA was not associated with improved patient and graft survival compared to untreated patients.

General aspects and pitfalls in liver transplant pathology

Pathology in a liver transplant setting addresses four different topics: establishment of a definite diagnosis of the liver disease before listing for transplantation, evaluation of the donor liver with regard to pre-existing diseases, in particular macrovesicular steatosis and fibrosis, assessment of the hepatectomy specimen, and post-transplant biopsy evaluation. Of these, post-transplant biopsy evaluation is the most challenging and clinically the most relevant issue. It requires fast diagnoses to facilitate specific treatment and it has to incorporate a broad spectrum of differential diagnoses. Precise knowledge about rejection, post-transplant therapy, pathology of immunosuppression, and recurrence of the initially underlying liver disease including the characteristic time peaks and atypical histological presentations (e.g., fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis) is needed to evaluate specific and combined histological pictures of liver damage. For adequate interpretation of post-transplant biopsies the hepatopathologist has to be informed about the essential clinico-anamnestic aspects such as time course, medication, imaging results, and serology.

Recurrence of autoimmune liver disease after liver transplantation: a systematic review

Recurrence of autoimmune liver disease in allografts has long been a topic of debate. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the reported incidence of recurrence after liver transplantation of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were used to identify articles. The inclusion criteria used were articles on patients with at least 90 days of posttransplantation follow-up, histologic criteria for diagnosis of PBC and AIH recurrence, radiologic or histologic criteria or both for diagnosis of PSC recurrence, and exclusion of other causes of liver disease causing similar histologic findings. Incidence in individual studies was combined to calculate the overall recurrence. Risk factors were analyzed whenever crude data were available. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Out of 90 articles identified, 43 met criteria for systematic review (PBC, 16; PSC, 14; AIH, 13). The calculated weighted recurrence rate was 18% for PBC, 11% for PSC, and 22% for AIH. No difference was found in PBC and AIH recurrence by type of primary immunosuppression. There were not enough data to assess this issue in PSC studies. There was evidence of publication bias among PSC and AIH studies but not among PBC studies. In conclusion, recurrence of autoimmune liver disease after liver transplantation appears to be a real concern. As these patients are followed long-term, recurrence of disease may become the primary cause of morbidity.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Diagnosis and management of allograft failure

The article focuses on diagnosis and management of allograft failure in four main categories: (1) ischemic-reperfusion injury (primary nonfunction), (2) technical complications (hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis), (3) chronic rejection, and (4) recurrent disease. It also discusses the complex problems involved in retransplantation for allograft failure.

Donor age influences 10-year liver graft histology independently of hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Factors influencing the long-term histological outcome of liver graft are not known. We conducted a prospective study based on a 10-year liver biopsy in order to identify the main factors influencing long-term graft histology.

METHODS

270 of 423 patients who still had their first functional graft 10 years after liver transplantation accepted to undergo routine liver biopsy. All slides were blindly reviewed by two pathologists.

RESULTS

Main histological findings were fibrosis in 143 patients (54%) and ductopenia in 76 patients (29%). Ductopenia was independently related to higher donor age (32+/-12 vs 28+/-13 years; P<0.02). Severity of fibrosis was influenced by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (P<0.001), hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence (P=0.001) and higher donor age (P=0.03). Eighty biopsies (30%) showed minimal-change lesions which were associated with the absence of HCV infection (24/80 vs 99/185; P<0.001) or of HBV infection (1/80 vs 15/185; P=0.03) and lower donor age (25+/-11 vs 31+/-13 years; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant infection by HCV or HBV are main factors influencing the histological course of liver graft. Donor age was also a strong factor in HCV infected patients as well as in HCV-negative patients. This variable should be taken into account, particularly for candidate recipients with long life expectancy.

The changing clinical presentation of recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent disease after liver transplant is a significant problem. Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (RPBC) is a histologic diagnosis. Clinical data is unreliable in predicting or diagnosing recurrence. RPBC appears to have a changing clinical presentation in recent years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The diagnosis of RPBC after liver transplantation was made histologically. Data were obtained from our prospectively maintained liver-transplant database and evaluated statistically.

RESULTS

Between 1985 and 1999, 1,835 liver transplants were performed, 169 for PBC. One hundred fifty-six patients were evaluated (one patient received retransplantation, and 13 were excluded). Seventeen (10.9%) experienced recurrence. Median posttransplantation follow-up time was 72.1 months. Median time to recurrence was 49.6 months. Median follow-up time after recurrence was 11.5 months. Neither acute rejection episodes (P=0.34) nor OKT3 use (P=0.36) before diagnosis of recurrence was significant. The combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone demonstrated recurrence in 6 of 71 (8.4%). Six of 49 (12.2%) patients treated with cyclosporine with or without mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone experienced recurrence. Six of 36 (16.7%) patients treated with tacrolimus and prednisolone with or without mycophenolate mofetil experienced recurrence. Patients treated with cyclosporine had numerically fewer recurrences than those treated with tacrolimus (P=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RPBC demonstrated prolonged survival. Clinical factors did not aid in predicting RPBC. The clinical course of RPBC appears to be different than in the earlier years of liver transplantation. Immunosuppression may play a role. The use and type of antimetabolite drugs had no affect on recurrence. RPBC demonstrated a different clinical course with tacrolimus treatment (shorter time to recurrence) and increased incidence when compared with cyclosporine treatment. Controlled randomized studies are necessary to determine differences between tacrolimus and cyclosporine treatment, if any.

Preventative therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis

Because the etiology of PBC is still unknown, therapies remain empirical. Moreover, no contributions on preventative therapy supported by evidence-based medicine have been published to date. However, there are at least two groups of subjects who might benefit from preventative therapy: (1) subjects with normal liver enzymes who are found AMA-positive during autoantibody screening and (2) subjects transplanted for PBC with no histologic or biochemical signs of disease recurrence. The key questions are whether any therapy should be proposed to these subjects, since the natural history of the disease is very long, and what kind of treatment should be prescribed. UDCA is a well-tolerated, definitely "physiologic" treatment, but it is expensive and two recent meta-analyses question its benefit on survival. Current theory considers PBC an autoimmune disease, with a genetic predisposition, possibly triggered by an infectious agent or xenobiotic. If this is so, gene therapies might be the most promising future preventative therapies. For the time being, however, the only practical preventative management is in regards to the complications of PBC, namely osteopenia and portal hypertension.

Recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation: Histologic estimate of incidence and natural history

The goals of this study were to determine the rate of recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) based on strict morphologic criteria and to evaluate histologic progression of recurrent PBC over time. Strict criteria for PBC recurrence were established as the presence of a florid duct lesion or destructive lymphocytic cholangitis within a dense portal infiltrate. Of the 784 OLTs performed at the Mayo Clinic during the first 12 years of the program, 100 met criteria for the PBC study group, and 35 met criteria for the control group. Strict histologic criteria for recurrent PBC were observed in 17 of 100 (17%) study patients (14 with florid duct lesion, 3 with destructive lymphocytic cholangitis within dense portal infiltrate). Mean follow-up for the PBC group was 4.7 years (range, 1.0 to 13.8). Mean time to recurrence was 3.7 years (median, 3.1; range, 0.3 to 7.9). In those who met strict criteria for recurrent PBC, 2 of 17 progressed to septal fibrosis (stage 3). No florid duct lesions, destructive lymphocytic cholangitis, or septal fibrosis were observed in the control group. Other less specific morphologic features of PBC (portal infiltrates, plasma cells, dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates, and lymphocytic cholangitis) were also evaluated in the course of this study. Based on strict criteria, a conservative histologic estimate of the rate of recurrent PBC is 17% with a mean of 4.7 years of follow-up. When criteria for histologic recurrence are expanded to include moderate lymphocytic cholangitis with lymphoplasmacytic portal infiltrate, the recurrence rate of PBC is estimated as 26%.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis

Liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment for end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). It appears now well accepted that the disease recurs in the allograft. The diagnosis of recurrent PBC is made on the basis of a consistent history and demonstrating the histologic features of PBC on liver biopsy and exclusion of other causes of bile duct damage.

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: a long-term pathologic study

Although recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) has been reported, the full spectrum of changes and progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis is not yet established. We performed a detailed retrospective clinicopathologic analysis of 43 patients who underwent LT for PBC. Eight patients (18.6%) had definite recurrent PBC with florid duct lesions, 5 patients (11.6%) had recurrence with features of autoimmune liver disease, not otherwise specified (AILD-NOS), 7 patients (16.3%) had plasmacytosis only, 4 patients (9.3%) had chronic rejection, 18 patients (41.9%) have no recurrence at present, and 1 patient (2.3%) had acquired hepatitis C. Although definite diagnoses of PBC and AILD-NOS recurrences (n = 13) were made 1 month to 14 years (median, 4 years) post-LT, all patients had plasmacytosis in their earlier biopsy specimens. Also, these patients showed similar pre-LT and post-LT clinical features, with progressive fibrosis in 4 of 8 and 2 of 5 patients, respectively. Four of 13 patients with definite recurrence and 14 of 18 patients with no recurrence were administered azathioprine (AZA) as part of their post-LT therapy (P =.01). Six of 13 and 16 of 18 patients currently are alive, with median follow-ups of 11 and 5 years, respectively. No significant differences were seen with donor-recipient group A, group B, group O blood type, sex, or HLA mismatches; native liver histological characteristics; or tacrolimus-based therapy. In conclusion, recurrent autoimmune liver disease was seen in 30% of patients after LT for PBC and had features of PBC and/or AILD-NOS. Progression seen in 46% of patients was associated with late graft failure. Patients with no recurrent disease had shorter follow-up periods and more frequent immunosuppression, including AZA; some may still develop recurrence with longer follow-up.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation

1. Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) after transplantation is controversial, but most studies support disease recurrence within the graft. 2. Granulomatous destructive cholangitis should be present, and exclusion of acute and chronic rejection, graft-versus-host disease, biliary obstruction, viral hepatitis, and drug effects is mandatory before making a diagnosis of recurrent PBC. 3. Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) after transplantation is difficult to diagnose because of the lack of a diagnostic gold standard. 4. Well-defined cholangiographic and histological criteria should be present, and exclusion of preservation injury, blood group type incompatibility between donor and recipient, chronic rejection, hepatic arterial occlusion, and viral infection is mandatory before making a diagnosis of recurrent PSC. 5. Most studies support recurrent autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after transplantation based on clinical, biochemical, serological, and histological criteria. Exclusion of rejection, viral infection, drug effects, and biliary obstruction is mandatory before making a diagnosis of recurrent AIH. 6. Intermediate-term patient and graft survival are excellent for patients with recurrent autoimmune liver diseases within the transplanted liver, but additional studies are required to address the impact of disease recurrence on long-term patient and graft survival.

Primary biliary cirrhosis: clinical, pathologic, and helical CT findings in 53 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare clinical, pathologic, and helical computed tomographic (CT) findings of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors reviewed the medical records and CT scans of 53 patients who underwent evaluation, treatment, and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) at their institution. All patients underwent helical multiphase CT (total, 98 abdominal CT scans; range, one to five scans per patient). Multiple epidemiologic, clinical, and morphologic criteria were evaluated. Advanced disease was defined as hepatic insufficiency leading to OLT within the subsequent 2 years. Clinical and morphologic features were evaluated and compared in the advanced and less advanced cases of PBC.

RESULTS

Common and characteristic findings included the following: 45 (85%) of the 53 patients were women with the onset of disease (diagnosis) in middle age (mean, 50.7 years; range, 26-71 years). The average time from diagnosis to OLT was 6.1 years (range, 1.5-20.0 years). CT findings in advanced PBC often resembled those seen in other forms of cirrhosis, with a small heterogeneously attenuating liver, varices, and splenomegaly. The liver in less advanced disease was usually enlarged or normal in size, with a smooth contour, little atrophy, and lacelike fibrosis and regenerative nodules in nearly one-third of the livers. Patients with less advanced disease frequently had varices (n = 33 [62%]) and ascites (n = 13 [24%]). Lymphadenopathy was seen in 47 (88%) patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma was found in four (8%) patients, two of whom also had chronic hepatitis C. During a follow-up period of 5-72 months (median, 46 months; mean, 42 months) after OLT, only two patients experienced recurrence of PBC.

CONCLUSION

PBC is an important cause of liver failure, with distinctive clinical and CT findings that may assist diagnosis and allow adequate treatment. CT can demonstrate varices and ascites before frank cirrhosis is evident and can help evaluate the progression of the disease.

Functional and morphological graft monitoring after liver transplantation

The development of effective immunosuppressive drugs and the refinement of surgical procedures have led to remarkable improvements in the long-term success of liver transplantation. This procedure is now widely recognised as an effective, preferable therapeutic option for the treatment of end-stage liver disease. The early diagnosis of dysfunction is an indispensable tool for the successful management of the hepatic allograft recipient. Liver function is usually assessed by biochemical and morphological examinations, usually based on coagulation factors (fibrinogen, fibrinogen degradation peptide, factor V, prothrombin time and prolonged thromboplastin time), transaminases, gamma-GT, ALP, bilirubin and lactic acid, and histology. Liver biopsy is usually performed before the implantation of the graft to assess the viability of the liver and following liver transplantation, whenever clinical events warrant it or as part of a routine biopsy schedule.

Concurrent de novo autoimmune hepatitis and recurrence of primary biliary cirrhosis post-liver transplantation

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is well known to recur after liver transplantation (LT). The recurrence is usually subclinical and evident only on histological examination. Recently, a new entity of de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has emerged that occurs after LT in patients who underwent transplantation for diseases other than AIH. This new condition occurs more often in children; however, there was a recent report of the first 2 cases in adults who originally underwent LT for PBC. We report the first case of concurrent de novo AIH and recurrence of PBC documented on the liver biopsy of an adult patient who underwent LT for end-stage PBC. Unlike the earlier report of 2 adults, our patient manifested an antinuclear antibody titer of more than 1/800 from a previously negative titer pre-LT, as well as fulfilled the International AIH Group criteria for a definite diagnosis of AIH. PBC recurrence was evidenced by typical florid duct lesion, antimitochondrial antibody titer increasing from 1/40 to greater than 1/800, and an elevated serum immunoglobulin M level. After the addition of azathioprine to baseline immunosuppression of tacrolimus and prednisolone, the patient responded rapidly, with complete normalization of liver test results.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis

Transplantation has become the accepted form of therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease. The diagnosis of recurrent disease in the allograft has been a matter of controversy, partly because of the difficulties in making the diagnosis in the allograft situation. The conventional criteria for diagnosing PBC may be inappropriate and there are many causes of bile duct damage in the graft. That the PBC-specific autoantibodies [such as antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) and gp-210] persist after transplantation is universally found, and some have reported the aberrant distribution of E2 in the allograft that is typical of PBC in the native liver, whether or not there is histological evidence of PBC recurrence. Most studies now accept that histological features of PBC, such as granulomatous bile duct damage, ductopenia and biliary-type fibrosis, may be found in the allograft; the histological features of PBC are variable and do not mirror the liver tests. The rate of recurrence increases with time, so that by 10 years, recurrence may be found in 30-50% of biopsies. There are no clear factors which identify those at risk of recurrence, but the pattern and degree of immunosuppression may be implicated. Cirrhosis has only rarely been reported. In the medium term, recurrence of PBC has little clinical impact. Ursodeoxycholic acid is used in some centres but there is no clear evidence for benefit.

Intrahepatic cholestasis following liver transplantation

Intrahepatic cholestasis following liver transplantation commonly occurs after liver transplantation and may be caused by infections, drugs such as cyclosporine and sulfonamides, and acute or chronic rejection. Less common causes such as fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis or recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis may also be encountered. Biliary strictures may also be present. Although some disorders may be managed medically, others often require repeat liver transplantation. Prompt recognition and specific treatment can improve the outcome for liver transplant recipients.