The humoral immune response against an HLA class I allodeterminant correlates with the HLA-DR phenotype of the responder

Formation of donor-specific antibodies depends on the epitope load of mismatched hlas in lung transplant recipients: A retrospective single-center study

The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has a significant impact on graft outcome in solid organ transplantation. Mismatched HLAs are recognized directly and indirectly by the recipient immune system. Both pathways occur in parallel and result in the generation of plasma cells, DSA, cytotoxic and T helper lymphocytes. Here, we present the results of an analysis of the epitope load of mismatched HLAs in a cohort of 220 lung transplant recipients using two in silico algorithms, HLAMatchmaker and PIRCHE-II (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes). De novo DSA (dnDSA) were detected by single antigen bead assays. The percentage of recipients who developed dnDSA was significantly higher in the group of patients who received lung transplants with a mismatching score above the detected threshold than in the group of patients who received lung transplants with a mismatching score below the threshold. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, the PIRCHE-II score appeared to be a superior predictor of dnDSA formation. In addition, PIRCHE-II technology was shown to be useful in predicting separate dnDSA1 and dnDSA2 formation. We conclude that both algorithms can be used for the evaluation of the epitope load of mismatched HLAs and the prediction of DSA development in lung transplant recipients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Implementation of molecular matching in transplantation requires further characterization of both immunogenicity and antigenicity of individual HLA epitopes

Over the past decade, high HLA epitope mismatch scores have been associated with inferior transplant outcomes using several tools, of which HLAMatchmaker is most well-known. This software uses theoretically defined polymorphic amino acid configurations, called eplets, for HLA compatibility analysis. Although consideration of eplet mismatch loads has potential for immunological risk stratification of transplant patients, the use of eplet matching in organ allocation algorithms is hindered by lacking knowledge of the immunogenicity of individual eplets, and the possibility that single mismatched amino acids, rather than complete eplets, are responsible for HLA antibody induction. There are several approaches to define eplet immunogenicity, such as antibody verification of individual eplets, and data-driven approaches using large datasets that correlate specific eplet mismatches to donor specific antibody formation or inferior transplant outcomes. Data-driven approaches can also be used to define whether single amino acid mismatches may be more informative than eplet mismatches for predicting HLA antibody induction. When using epitope knowledge for the assignment of unacceptable antigens, it important to realize that alleles sharing an eplet to which antibodies have formed are not automatically all unacceptable since multiple contact sites determine the binding strength and thus biological function and pathogenicity of an antibody, which may differ between reactive alleles. While the future looks bright for using HLA epitopes in clinical decision making, major steps need to be taken to make this a clinical reality.

HLA-EMMA: A user-friendly tool to analyse HLA class I and class II compatibility on the amino acid level

In renal transplantation, polymorphic amino acids on mismatched donor HLA molecules can lead to the induction of de novo donor‐specific antibodies (DSA), which are associated with inferior graft survival. To ultimately prevent de novo DSA formation without unnecessarily precluding transplants it is essential to define which polymorphic amino acid mismatches can actually induce an antibody response. To facilitate this, we developed a user‐friendly software program that establishes HLA class I and class II compatibility between donor and recipient on the amino acid level. HLA epitope mismatch algorithm (HLA‐EMMA) is a software program that compares simultaneously the HLA class I and class II amino acid sequences of the donor with the HLA amino acid sequences of the recipient and determines the polymorphic solvent accessible amino acid mismatches that are likely to be accessible to B cell receptors. Analysis can be performed for a large number of donor‐recipient pairs at once. As proof of principle, a previously described study cohort of 191 lymphocyte immunotherapy recipients was analysed with HLA‐EMMA and showed a higher frequency of DSA formation with higher number of solvent accessible amino acids mismatches. Overall, HLA‐EMMA can be used to analyse compatibility on amino acid level between donor and recipient HLA class I and class II simultaneously for large cohorts to ultimately determine the most immunogenic amino acid mismatches.

PIRCHE-II: an algorithm to predict indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes in solid organ transplantation

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches between donors and recipients may lead to alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. Over the last few decades, our knowledge of the complexity of the HLA system has dramatically increased, as numerous new HLA alleles have been identified. As a result, the likelihood of alloreactive responses towards HLA mismatches after solid organ transplantation cannot easily be assessed. Algorithms are promising solutions to estimate the risk for alloreactivity after solid organ transplantation. In this review, we show that the recently developed PIRCHE-II (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes) algorithm can be used to minimize alloreactivity towards HLA mismatches. Together with the use of other algorithms and simulation approaches, the PIRCHE-II algorithm aims for a better estimated alloreactive risk for individual patients and eventually an improved graft survival after solid organ transplantation.

Assessment of human leukocyte antigen immunogenicity: current methods, challenges and opportunities

Purpose of review

Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching improves outcomes after solid-organ transplantation, but current assessment of HLA incompatibility is inadequate as it does not consider the relative immunogenicity of individual HLA mismatches. In this article, we review existing strategies for assessing HLA immunogenicity and discuss current challenges and future opportunities in this field.

Recent findings

Current HLA immunogenicity algorithms focus primarily on the humoral component of the alloimmune response and aim to determine a measure of ‘dissimilarity’ between donor and recipient HLA. This can be achieved by deriving information from comparison of donor and recipient HLA at the amino acid sequence, structural and/or the physicochemical level, accounting for both B-cell and T-cell pathways of alloreactivity. Substantial evidence now supports the superiority of this molecular definition of HLA incompatibility, over conventional enumeration of HLA antigenic differences, for assessing the risk of humoral alloimmunity and for predicting graft outcomes after transplantation.

Summary

Significant progress has been made in developing computational HLA immunogenicity algorithms that offer exciting opportunities for a more rational approach to determining the degree of donor–recipient HLA incompatibility and to defining HLA-related immunological risk. A number of challenges now need to be overcome to enable their implementation into clinical practice.

Predicting Humoral Alloimmunity from Differences in Donor and Recipient HLA Surface Electrostatic Potential

In transplantation, development of humoral alloimmunity against donor HLA is a major cause of organ transplant failure, but our ability to assess the immunological risk associated with a potential donor–recipient HLA combination is limited. We hypothesized that the capacity of donor HLA to induce a specific alloantibody response depends on their structural and physicochemical dissimilarity compared with recipient HLA. To test this hypothesis, we first developed a novel computational scoring system that enables quantitative assessment of surface electrostatic potential differences between donor and recipient HLA molecules at the tertiary structure level [three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch score (EMS-3D)]. We then examined humoral alloimmune responses in healthy females subjected to a standardized injection of donor lymphocytes from their male partner. This analysis showed a strong association between the EMS-3D of donor HLA and donor-specific alloantibody development; this relationship was strongest for HLA-DQ alloantigens. In the clinical transplantation setting, the immunogenic potential of HLA-DRB1 and -DQ mismatches expressed on donor kidneys, as assessed by their EMS-3D, was an independent predictor of development of donor-specific alloantibody after graft failure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the translational potential of our approach to improve immunological risk assessment and to decrease the burden of humoral alloimmunity in organ transplantation.

Matching donor and recipient based on predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen epitopes

The predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen (HLA) epitopes (PIRCHE) algorithm is a novel in silico algorithm to determine donor-recipient compatibility. The PIRCHE algorithm determines donor-recipient compatibility by counting the number of mismatched HLA-derived epitopes that are involved in indirect T-cell alloimmune responses; these epitopes are designated as PIRCHE. Over the last few years, the PIRCHE algorithm has been investigated in both hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and solid organ transplantation. This review describes the theory of the algorithm, its application in transplantation, and highlights the future perspectives on the clinical application of the PIRCHE algorithm.

The Immunogenicity of HLA Class II Mismatches: The Predicted Presentation of Nonself Allo-HLA-Derived Peptide by the HLA-DR Phenotype of the Recipient Is Associated with the Formation of DSA

The identification of permissible HLA class II mismatches can prevent DSA in mismatched transplantation. The HLA-DR phenotype of recipients contributes to DSA formation by presenting allo-HLA-derived peptides to T-helper cells, which induces the differentiation of B cells into plasma cells. Comparing the binding affinity of self and nonself allo-HLA-derived peptides for recipients' HLA class II antigens may distinguish immunogenic HLA mismatches from nonimmunogenic ones. The binding affinities of allo-HLA-derived peptides to recipients' HLA-DR and HLA-DQ antigens were predicted using the NetMHCIIpan 3.1 server. HLA class II mismatches were classified based on whether they induced DSA and whether self or nonself peptide was predicted to bind with highest affinity to recipients' HLA-DR and HLA-DQ. Other mismatch characteristics (eplet, hydrophobic, electrostatic, and amino acid mismatch scores and PIRCHE-II) were evaluated. A significant association occurred between DSA formation and the predicted HLA-DR presentation of nonself peptides (P = 0.0169; accuracy = 80%; sensitivity = 88%; specificity = 63%). In contrast, mismatch characteristics did not differ significantly between mismatches that induced DSA and the ones that did not, except for PIRCHE-II (P = 0.0094). This methodology predicts DSA formation based on HLA mismatches and recipients' HLA-DR phenotype and may identify permissible HLA mismatches to help optimize HLA matching and guide donor selection.

Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen

Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.

Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes Presented by HLA-DRB1 Are Related to HLA Antibody Formation During Pregnancy

Pregnancy can prime maternal immune responses against inherited paternal HLA of the fetus, leading to the production of child-specific HLA antibodies. We previously demonstrated that donor-specific HLA antibody formation after kidney transplantation is associated with donor-derived HLA epitopes presented by recipient HLA class II (predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes presented by HLA class II [PIRCHE-II]). In the present study, we evaluated the role of PIRCHE-II in child-specific HLA antibody formation during pregnancy. A total of 229 mother-child pairs were HLA typed. For all mismatched HLA class I molecules of the child, we subsequently predicted the number of HLA epitopes that could be presented by maternal HLA class II molecules. Child-specific antigens were classified as either immunogenic or nonimmunogenic HLA based on the presence of specific antibodies and correlated to PIRCHE-II numbers. Immunogenic HLA contained higher PIRCHE-II numbers than nonimmunogenic HLA. Moreover, the probability of antibody production during pregnancy increased with the number of PIRCHE-II. In conclusion, our data suggest that the number of PIRCHE-II is related to the formation of child-specific HLA antibodies during pregnancy. Present confirmation of the role of PIRCHE-II in antibody formation outside the transplantation setting suggests the PIRCHE-II concept is universal.

HLA epitopes as viewed by antibodies: what is it all about?

The need for new approaches to define HLA antibodies, in the context of organ transplantation, is intensely debated among HLA professionals. In this review, we sought to provide background and perspective to current understanding of the immunogenicity of HLA mismatches with respect to the humoral alloimmune response and the definition of B cell epitopes. Initial data suggest that epitope matching not only assists in defining better matches for the current transplant, but also minimizes the risk of developing de novo HLA-donor-specific-antibodies posttransplant. In other words, other than lowering the risk of current graft rejection, epitope matching is likely to lower overall future sensitization levels and thus increases the likelihood of finding a compatible donor when the need for a retransplantation arises. More detailed knowledge of epitopes makes it possible to investigate what constitutes permissible versus non-permissible HLA mismatches. The currently available evidence suggest that epitope matching is the most rational way to decrease the risk of HLA-linked transplant rejection. This review is aimed at stimulating further and more intense collaborative effort in this field.

Uncomplicated oocyte donation pregnancies are associated with a higher incidence of human leukocyte antigen alloantibodies

BACKGROUND

Fetuses in pregnancies conceived after oocyte donation (OD) have a higher degree of antigeneic dissimilarity with the mother compared to semi-allogeneic fetuses after natural conception. We questioned whether this leads to higher level of HLA antibody formation in OD pregnancies.

METHOD

Uncomplicated pregnancies after OD were compared with pregnancies conceived either spontaneously or by IVF. We calculated the number of HLA- and epitope mismatches. Maternal sera were screened for HLA antibodies with ELISA; child HLA specific antibody production was determined using CDC and Luminex with single antigen beads for class I and II.

RESULTS

A significantly (p<0.0001) higher incidence of HLA antibody production was observed in women conceiving after OD (69%) compared to non-donor pregnancies (24-25%). The antibody formation was positively correlated with the number of fetomaternal antigen (Spearman's rho 0.95, p<0.0001) and epitope mismatches (Spearman's rho 0.91, p<0.0001). The number of HLA-DR mismatches between women and child was an independent risk factor for the production of HLA class I specific alloantibodies.

CONCLUSION

Women conceiving after OD have a higher risk of developing child-specific HLA antibodies; the higher the number of immunogenetic differences, the higher the chance these antibodies are formed. The high incidence of antibody production also strongly depends upon the number of HLA-DR mismatches. Despite the stronger antibody response, OD was associated with uncomplicated pregnancy in cases included in this study.

Predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes presented by HLA-DR correlate with the de novo development of donor-specific HLA IgG antibodies after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

HLA class-I mismatches selectively induce antibody formation after kidney transplantation. The de novo development of donor-specific IgG HLA class-I antibodies may be dependent on the HLA class-II background of the patient by presenting T-helper epitopes within the recognized HLA class-I antigens.

METHODS

The correlation between antibody production against mismatched donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I and the number of HLA class II-restricted predicted indirectly recognizable HLA epitopes (PIRCHE-II) in the respective HLA class-I mismatches was investigated. To this end, we analyzed sera taken after nephrectomy from a cohort of 21 non-immunized individuals that received a renal transplant.

RESULTS

Fourty-nine HLA class-I mismatches were found which all contained immunogenic eplets according to HLAMatchmaker. Donor specific HLA antibody responses were detected against 38 HLA class-I mismatches after nephrectomy. These mismatches were found to contain a larger number of PIRCHE-II when compared to mismatches which did not induce donor specific HLA antibodies. Most PIRCHE-II (68%) were not part of an eplet as defined by HLAMatchmaker.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that presentation of donor-derived HLA class-I peptides by recipient HLA class-II molecules plays a significant role in de novo development of donor-specific IgG HLA antibodies.

Compatibility and kidney transplantation: the way to go

Long lasting debates in the past questioned the relevance of any sort of compatibility in post mortal kidney transplantation. It is for no say that fully compatible transplants have the highest chances for a long patient and graft survival. In the present report the use of HLA-DR as a representative of the Major Histocompatibility Complex class II genes in the allocation of organs is discussed. The major arguments are the easiness to offer to patients a compatible graft in a relatively short waiting time, an increase in graft survival, the less sensitization during the transplantation period, and the lower waiting time for a retransplant. Even if the number of organ donors remains the same a lowering of the mean waiting time is expected because of the longer period of graft survival.

The generation and maintenance of serum alloantibody

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) mediate hyperacute and acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which can lead to early graft damage and loss, and are also associated with chronic AMR and reduced long-term graft survival. Such alloantibodies can be generated by previous exposure to major histocompatibility (MHC) antigens (usually via blood transfusions, previous allografts or pregnancy) or can occur de novo after transplantation. Recent studies also suggest that non-MHC antibodies, including those recognising major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA), MICB, vimentin, angiotensin II type I receptor may also have an adverse impact on allograft outcomes. In this review, we consider how the dose, route and context of antigen exposure influences DSA induction and describe factors which control the generation, maintenance and survival of alloantibody-producing plasma cells. Finally, we discuss the implications of these variables on therapeutic approaches to DSA.

Association of HLA phenotypes of end-stage renal disease patients preparing for first transplantation with anti-HLA antibody status

Patients with pre-transplantation high levels of panel reactive antibody (PRA) have an increased risk of graft failure, and renal transplantation in sensitized patients remains a highly significant challenge worldwide. The influence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies on the development of rejection episodes depends on patient-specific clinical factors and differs from patient to patient. The HLA typing of the recipient might influence the development of anti-HLA antibodies. Some HLA antigens appear to be more immunogenic than others. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the distribution of HLA phenotypes in PRA-positive and PRA-negative end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on the basis of having sensitizing events or not. Our study included 642 (mean age: 41.54; female/male: 310/332) ESRD patients preparing for the first transplantation and who are on the cadaveric kidney transplantation waiting list of Istanbul Medical Faculty in 2008-2009. Class I HLA-A,B typing was performed by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) method, whereas class II HLA-DRB1 typing was performed by low-resolution polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-sequence-specific primer (SSP). All serum samples were screened for the presence of IgG type of anti-HLA class I- and II-specific antibodies by enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA). PRA-negative group consisted of 558 (86.9%) and PRA-positive group included 84 (13.1%) patients. We have found statistically significant frequency of HLA-A3 (p=0.018), HLA-A66 (p=0.04), and HLA-B18 (p=0.006) antigens in PRA-positive patients and DRB1*07 (p=0.02) having the highest frequency in patients with sensitizing event history but no anti-HLA development suggesting that DRB1*07 might be associated with low risk of anti-HLA antibody formation.

A structurally based approach to determine HLA compatibility at the humoral immune level

HLAMatchmaker is a structurally based matching program. Each HLA antigen is viewed as a string of epitopes represented by short sequences (triplets) involving polymorphic amino acid residues in antibody-accessible positions. HLAMatchmaker determines which triplets are different between donor and recipient, and this algorithm is clinically useful in determining HLA mismatch acceptability. Triplets provide however an incomplete description of the HLA epitope repertoire and expanded criteria must be used including longer sequences and polymorphic residues in discontinuous positions. Such criteria should consider the structural basis of antibody-antigen interactions including contact areas and binding energy, the essence of antigenicity. This report describes the development of a structurally defined HLA epitope repertoire based on stereochemical modeling of crystallized complexes of antibodies and different protein antigens. This analysis considered also data in the literature about contributions of amino acid residues to antigen-antibody binding energy. The results have led to the concept that HLA antigens like other antigenic proteins have structural epitopes consisting of 15-22 residues that constitute the binding face with alloantibody. Each structural epitope has a functional epitope of about 2-5 residues that dominate the strength and specificity of binding with antibody. The remaining residues of a structural epitope provide supplementary interactions that increase the stability of the antigen-antibody complex. Each functional epitope has one or more non-self residues and the term "eplet" is used to describe polymorphic HLA residues within 3.0-3.5 A of a given sequence position on the molecular surface. Many eplets represent short linear sequences identical to those referred to as triplets but others have residues in discontinuous sequence positions that cluster together on the molecular surface. Serologically defined HLA determinants correspond well to eplets. The eplet version of HLAMatchmaker represents therefore a more complete repertoire of structurally defined HLA epitopes and provides a more detailed assessment of HLA compatibility.

Successful renal transplantation despite low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody without IVIg or plasmapheresis

We prospectively transplanted 10 primary kidney recipients with deceased donor organs (nine kidney and one pancreas/kidney) when their flow cytometric T-cell IgG, HLA class I donor-specific crossmatch was positive but the AHG T-cell crossmatch was negative, with a median follow-up of 1.8 yr. No pre- or peri-operative IVIg or plasmapheresis was administered to any patient. All but one of the 11 organs transplanted into patients with a flow T(+)/AHG(-) crossmatch is currently functioning despite the continued presence of circulating low levels of HLA class I antibody. Flow HLA class I antigen-coated beads showed the presence of at least one donor-specific HLA class I antibody at transplantation in each of the 10 cases. No rejections were observed in seven of the 10 cases (70%). Six rejection episodes, four cellular and two humoral, occurred in three patients. Each rejection was successfully treated. The only graft loss occurred in a kidney recipient on day 667 secondary to ischemia to the kidney because of cardiac surgery. Thus, short-term (one to two years) graft survival in primary transplants was not influenced by low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody present at transplantation and no prophylactic treatment such as IVIg, plasmapheresis, anti-CD20 or splenectomy was needed peri-operatively.

Differential Immunogenicity of HLA Class I Alloantigens for the Humoral versus the Cellular Immune Response: “Towards Tailor-Made HLA Mismatching”

The immunogenicity of an individual human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I mismatch is different for the cellular and the humoral alloimmune responses. The consequence is that the same antigen can induce a strong antibody response and no cytotoxic T lymphocyte reactivity, but the reverse can occur also. Exact knowledge of the immunogenicity of an HLA mismatch for an individual patient can lead to a strategy of tailor-made HLA mismatching if no HLA identical donor is available. Depending on the clinical situation, one should select a donor with HLA mismatches according to the humoral or cellular mismatch algorithm.

Public Epitope Specificity of HLA Class I Antibodies Induced by a Failed Kidney Transplant: Alloantibody Characterization by Flow Cytometric Techniques

BACKGROUND

Patients whose kidney grafts fail develop alloantibodies that react with many HLA molecules. We analyzed the epitope specificity of HLA class I alloantibodies in the sera of 55 patients who had been sensitized by kidney grafts, and investigated the immunogenicity of various polymorphic epitopes.

METHODS

HLA class I alloantibodies were detected and characterized by flow cytometry (FlowPRA beads). Potential "immunizing epitopes" were identified by comparing the amino acid sequences of HLA class I antigens/alleles of the donor, recipient and the antibody-reactivity pattern.

RESULTS

In the 55 anti-HLA class I-positive patients, 82 different antibody reactivity patterns were identified; all but 5 (94%) were determined by a "public epitope" of donor HLA-A and/or -B molecules. Forty-five of 50 patients who showed HLA-A Res-MMs with their donors produced HLA-A antibodies, but only 31 of 51 subjects with HLA-B Res-MMs produced HLA-B antibodies (P=0.001; O.R.=5.81). The antibody patterns were specific for a "single" epitope of the mismatched donor molecules in 91% of patients. Forty-three of the 120 (36%) mismatched HLA-A and/or -B epitopes were positively correlated with antibody production. The polymorphic determinants of higher immunogenic capacity were b80N (Bw6-associated) and ab82-83LR (Bw4-associated) public epitopes.

CONCLUSIONS

The humoral immune response against a kidney graft mainly produces HLA class I antibodies specific for "public epitopes" of mismatched donor molecules. A "single" donor-epitope may determine the production of a spread antibody pattern. In renal transplantation, epitope matching is better than HLA antigen matching for avoiding or minimizing development of HLA antibodies.

Recipient-Specific Tolerance after HLA-Mismatched Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Lower incidence and severity of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) has been observed in leukemia patients receiving HLA-mismatched umbilical cord (UCB) transplants. However, despite the increased use of UCB in stem cell transplantation, the mechanisms underlying these favorable outcomes are not well delineated.

METHODS

We analyzed antigen specific lymphocyte responses after transplant to determine whether the decreased allogeneic responsiveness of UCB lymphocytes is attributable to pan-unresponsiveness, lymphocyte repressive or recipient-specific tolerance.

RESULTS

Circulating lymphocytes collected early (3 months) after UCB transplant demonstrate a less naïve phenotype compared with that in the infused graft. Additionally, after transplant, circulating peripheral blood UCB-derived lymphocytes produced normal levels of interferon-gamma and proliferated normally when stimulated with mitogen or third party alloantigen. In contrast, when stimulated with recipient antigen, circulating lymphocytes emerging posttransplant did not proliferate nor produce interferon-gamma. Moreover, analysis of interleukin-4 production revealed a Th2 response to recipient antigens. These data indicate early induction of immune tolerance of naïve UCB graft lymphocytes with skewing of transplant recipient-specific immune response towards Th2 cytokine profile.

CONCLUSIONS

UCB graft lymphocyte immune naivety and observed early tolerance induction may contribute to the observed favorable GVHD incidence, despite infusion of HLA mismatch grafts in the unrelated allogeneic setting.

Differential immunogenicity of HLA mismatches in clinical transplantation

Although HLA matching is beneficial in clinical transplantation, it is not feasible to select a completely HLA matched donor for every potential recipient because of the enormous polymorphism of the HLA system. As a consequence, the majority of the recipients will be transplanted with a mismatched donor organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant. For this large group of patients it is important to take advantage of the differential immunogenicity of HLA mismatches and to select for them a donor with HLA mismatches of low immunogenicity, the so-called acceptable mismatches. The differential immunogenicity of HLA mismatches can be determined by either retrospective analysis of graft survival data or by in vitro assays measuring T-cell and B-cell alloreactivity. A recently developed computer algorithm (HLAMatchmaker) can be instrumental in selecting donors with HLA mismatches, which do not lead to alloantibody formation. The theoretical background and practical implications of this acceptable mismatch approach are discussed.

The HLA-DR phenotype of the responder is predictive of humoral response against HLA class I antigens

Recent studies suggest that the immunogenicity of an human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility should be considered in the context of the HLA phenotype of the recipient. The HLA-DR phenotype of the responder is thought to be predictive for the strength of the alloimmune response. In order to analyze the humoral response against HLA class I antigens in the context of the HLA-DR phenotype of the responder, we selected all HLA-DR homozygous Dutch patients that were present on the Eurotransplant waiting list between 1967 and 2000 (n=1,317 patients). By logistic regression it was determined whether antibody production against a specific HLA class I antigen is associated with a particular HLA-DR antigen in the patient. Furthermore, it was analyzed whether a patient, expressing a particular HLA-DR antigen, preferentially produces antibodies against particular HLA class I antigens. The results demonstrate that patients, homozygous for a certain HLA-DR antigen, cannot be considered high or low responders when analyzing the antibody response in terms of panel reactive antibody (PRA) value. However, a correlation can be found between the HLA-DR phenotype of the patient and the specific antibody response against HLA class I antigens. For example, antibodies against HLA-A10, -A11, -A19, and -B35 are produced more frequently by HLA-DR6 positive individuals, whereas antibodies against HLA-A3, -B5, -B7, -B8, and -B12 are produced more frequently by HLA-DR4 positive individuals. These data confirm that the HLA-DR phenotype of the responder plays a determinative role in the immunogenicity of mismatched HLA antigens. The results indicate that selection of HLA class I mismatches of the donor in the context of the HLA-DR phenotype of the responder might reduce the incidence of humoral graft rejection and minimize the sensitization grade of retransplant candidates.

Differential immunogenicity of paternal HLA Class I antigens in pregnant women

More insight into the differential immunogenicity of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches will be beneficial for donor selection in clinical transplantation. In this study the immunogenicity of HLA antigens was analyzed by examining the antibody profiles in women who have been pregnant. In total 888 women, who had pregnancy induced HLA alloantibodies, were included in this study, while 413 women who had not been immunized by their pregnancy, served as controls. First it was analyzed whether women expressing particular HLA antigens are more likely to produce HLA alloantibodies. Next we determined whether certain HLA mismatches of their children are more immunogenic than other ones. Finally we studied whether the immunogenicity of specific HLA mismatches is dependent on the HLA phenotype of the women. Women expressing HLA-A3, HLA-A32, and HLA-B21 are more likely to produce alloantibodies whereas women expressing HLA-B13 and HLA-B17 have a significantly lower incidence of alloantibodies compared with women expressing other HLA antigens. Children with HLA-A2 or HLA-B5 mismatches induced alloantibodies significantly more often whereas children with HLA-A30, -A31 or -A33 and HLA-A28 induced alloantibodies significantly less often than children with other HLA class I mismatches. Finally we could demonstrate that the immunogenicity of a particular HLA mismatch is dependent on the HLA phenotype of the women. Information on the differential immunogenicity of HLA mismatches may be of benefit for the determination of acceptable and taboo mismatches in the case of donor selection for (highly sensitized) patients.

Definition of permissible and immunogenic HLA antigens based on epitope analysis of the HLA specific antibodies produced in sensitized patients

The goal of this study was to develop an accurate protocol whereby detection of acceptable HLA-A and -B mismatches is based on epitope analysis of HLA class I specific antibodies detected in the serum of highly sensitized patients awaiting a kidney retransplant. A total of 400 serum samples from 44 highly sensitized patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) of > or = 60% were collected during a 3-year follow-up period. All patients had been sensitized from a previous graft. In order to define the specificities of the HLA class I specific antibodies, two techniques were used in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) technique. Epitope identification was based on class I HLA antigen sequencing, where the unique epitope configuration on one HLA antigen represented the private epitope of the specific HLA antigen, and epitopes shared by more than one HLA antigen represented public determinants. The epitope prediction for the immunogenic HLA epitopes was based on an MHC database. For each highly sensitized patient, antibody specificities against actual and 'at risk' epitopes were defined. Following epitope analysis, all HLA antigens that did not express the actual and/or 'at risk' immunogenic epitopes were considered as acceptable mismatches of epitope analysis. The cytotoxicity of highly sensitized patients was determined using two different panels of selected, separated T lymphocytes. HLA class I specific IgG antibodies against 69 actual and 86 'at risk' epitopes were detected. In all patients, a large number of acceptable mismatches were defined. These included a large number of HLA antigens, corresponding to both HLA-A and -B loci. Our study introduces an accurate protocol for the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients. According to this protocol, the detailed description of immunogenic HLA specific epitope targets, against which HLA class I specific antibodies are directed, is a useful tool for the detection of acceptable mismatches in highly sensitized patients. This may lead to reduced production of HLA class I specific antibodies and, consequently, improved graft survival.

HLA phenotypes of ESRD patients are risk factors in the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) response

To determine whether recipient HLA phenotypes are correlated with an increased or decreased risk of alloantibody sensitization in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) candidates for first or repeat kidney transplantation; we analyzed 19440 kidney allograft recipients consisting of 13,216 Caucasians and 6224 non-Caucasians transplanted between 10/87 and 11/98 at South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation (SEOPF) member institutions. Relative risk values and 95% confidence limits were obtained using Wolfe's method. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates that influence sensitization, i.e. ethnicity, gender, age, pregnancies, transfusions, primary/repeat transplant and living versus cadaver donor. Univariate analysis of the entire cohort indicated that nine HLA allelotypes (DR1,4,7; B8,12,40; A1,2,11) were associated with a significantly reduced risk of sensitization, and five allelotypes (B42,B53; A 10,19,36) were associated with an increased risk of PRA responses. Corrected for the number of statistical comparisons, recipients with DR1, DR4, A1 or A2 were 15% less likely to be sensitized per allelotype. Recipients with B42, B53 or A36 were at increased risk of preformed antibodies, after correction of the P value, for an average of 38% increased risk per allelotype. In the multivariate analysis, HLA phenotypes identified as independent risk factors associated with protection against sensitization were DR1,4,7; B12(44,45); and A1,2, with an average reduced risk of 9% per allelotype. The only independent susceptibility allelotype was A36 with an increased risk of 29%. The A10 (25,26,34,66) group reached borderline significance. We also looked for HLA-DR,-B,-A combinations that could potentially represent protective or at risk haplotypes/genotypes. Stepwise logistic regression identified five combinations associated with protection: DR1-B35-A3; DR1-B35-A2; DR1-B44-A2; DR4-B44-A2; DR7-B57-A1 (RR range 0.83-0.63) with 27% average reduced risk per combination. Phenotype combinations associated with an increased risk of sensitization were: DR2-B44-A2; DR2B53-A2; DR3-B8-A1: DR3-B42-A30; DR6-B42-A30; DR11-B53-A30 (RR range 2.76-1.48) with an average increased risk of 70% per combination. This study provides strong evidence that HLA-linked genes influence the anti-HLA PRA response. The magnitude of the altered PRA response risk in DR-B-A combinations was approximately twice that of the allelotypes at individual loci. HLA-DR genes seemed to contribute most of the altered risk. The correlations between DR types and PRA responsiveness are consistent with the DR types previously regarded as predictors of kidney graft survival. The magnitude of increased PRA risk attributable to an allelotype or combination was approximately twice that associated with a decreased risk. We conclude that some HLA class II-linked genes modulate the PRA response in a clinically significant manner. This immune response gene (Ir) regulation probably operates through polymorphic HLA molecules in their physiologic roles of antigen processing and presentation to helper T cells.

Is there MHC Class II restriction of the response to MHC Class I in transplant patients?

BACKGROUND

In this study, we evaluated distinct HLA-DRB1 alleles to determine class II restriction of the production of HLA-A2-specific antibodies in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Data from 217 renal transplant patients who received an HLA-A2-mismatched renal graft were analyzed with regard to HLA-A2 humoral responsiveness. High-resolution DNA typing of class II HLA-DR alleles was performed by polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primer. Patients who had one of the following eight HLA-DRB1 alleles were included in the study: -*0101, -*0301, -*0401, -*0701, -*1101, -*1301, -*1401, and -*1501. Serum samples were screened posttransplantation with the standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity procedure. In addition, recombinant HLA-A2 monomers (the "MonoLISA" assay) were used as a target for the detection of HLA-A2 group-specific antibodies. The following HLA-A2 amino acid positions (termed "epitopes") that are responsible for the induction of an antibody response were defined: 74H, 65-66GK, 62G, 114H, 142-145TTKH, and 107W-127K. The definition of the "HLA-DR permittors" of anti-HLA-A2 response was based on a "class II restriction table" designed for this purpose. Prediction of immunogenic and/or nonimmunogenic HLA-A2 peptides was based on an MHC database.

RESULTS

The HLA-DRB1-*0101 and -*1401 alleles had a trend toward a positive correlation with the production of HLA class I-specific antibodies against the HLA-A2 shared (public) epitopes 65-66GK and -62G, respectively. Only the DRB1-*1501 allele had higher trend toward a positive correlation with the production of antibodies against the HLA-A2 private (74H) epitope. In 42 patients with the HLA-DRB1-*1501 allele, 11 (26%) patients produced HLA-specific antibodies against the HLA-A2 group of epitope(s). Moreover, in these patients, spreading of the alloreactivity against "other" HLA antigens was detected. Many of these other HLA antigens did not belong to HLA-A2 group but had newly defined shared epitopes with this group. Furthermore, the epitope prediction, based on an MHC database, revealed differences in the ligation strength (score) to the HLA allele (class I and II) for a specific HLA-A2 peptide in the 42 patients (responders and nonresponders).

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented in this paper suggest that the HLA class II allele and the type of the bound allopeptide may influence the humoral and cellular response. The immunogenicity of these allopeptides could be predicted with an MHC database (high-scored peptide=activating peptide and low-scored peptide=suppressor peptide). In the future, production of synthetic peptide analogues, on the basis of these predictions, could be used for induction of T-cell anergy and/or tolerance. In the short term, algorithms, on the basis of our approach, could be tested for influence on graft survival and allosensitization in current high-quality data sets.

Effect of Bw4 and Bw6 epitope mismatches on antibody production, acute and chronic rejection, and graft survival in renal allografts

BACKGROUND

Highly sensitized patients often have antibodies directed against the HLA Bw4 and Bw6 epitopes. Because of the high frequency of these epitopes, when present, these antibodies result in a high incidence of positive cross-matches. We sought to determine whether antibodies specific for Bw4 or Bw6 affected renal allograft outcome.

METHODS

The effect of mismatches for the HLA class I public epitopes, Bw4 and Bw6, was examined in 72 recipients of one haplotype matched recipients of living, related donor renal allografts selected to control for degree of HLA mismatch. Analysis of the production of HLA-specific antibody was performed for 180 recipients of failed cadaveric allografts by complement-dependent cytotoxicity tests and by an enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the incidence of acute rejection, number of rejection episodes or 1-year allograft survival among Bw4/6 matched versus mismatched recipients of one haplotype matched allografts. Additionally, no significant difference in the development of chronic allograft nephropathy was noted among 56 recipients followed long-term (> or =3 years). In the recipients of failed cadaveric transplants, Bw4/6 mismatching was associated with the frequency and magnitude of production of HLA-specific antibody. However, the panel reactive antibodies correlated with the number of HLA-A and -B mismatches, and there was no additional impact of Bw4/6 mismatching. IgG, HLA-specific antibodies were found to be significantly increased among patients homozygous for Bw4 or Bw6, whether or not there was a Bw4/6 mismatch.

CONCLUSIONS

Mismatching for Bw4 or Bw6 does not confer any independent, increased risk for humoral sensitization or renal allograft failure.

Analysis of the CD40/CD40L role in the sustenance of alloreactive antibody production

CD40 ligand (CD40L) is important for T/B lymphocyte interaction. To understand the cellular basis of humoral allosensitization we, therefore: (1) measured CD40L protein and gene expression in sensitized and non-sensitized uremic unactivated peripheral CD4+ T lymphocytes; (2) studied the impact of blocking the CD40/CD40L pathway on alloreactive antibody (allo-Ab) production by engrafted sensitized PBLs into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice after in vitro preactivation with IL2/LPs/HLA class II allopeptides and adjuvants as a potent stimulus to produce allo-Ab (Shoker et al. Transplantation 1999;68;1188); and (3) studied the modifying effect of CD40/CD40L blockade on T helper type I and II cytokine gene expression in the respective mice spleen. The CD40L protein was measured by flow cytometry and the gene expression was measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Alloreactive antibodies (alo-Abs) produced by sensitized PBLs engrafted into SCID mice with and without blockade of the CD40 receptor were measured by the PRA-STAT ELISA method. The modifying effects of CD40 blocking on allo-Ab production and cytokine gene expression by the engrafted cells measured by RT-PCR were then compared. There was no detectable CD40L protein expression in either the uremic or the control groups. The CD40L gene expression of 0.04 +/- 0.02 attomoles (aM) in the sensitized group was significantly higher than in the non-sensitized patients (0.009 +/- 0.007 aM, P < 0.0001) or the control CD4+ T cells (0.016 +/- 0.004 aM, P < 0.001). Blockade of the CD40 receptor abrogated the production of allo-Ab antibodies by the engrafted sensitized cells in 60% of the tested mice (n = 10); decreased the mean +/- S.D. optic density of allo-Ab to 0.1 +/- 0.13 and the mean +/- S.D. PRA to 12 + 16). In the presence of the control Ab, allo-Ab production in SCID sera was present in 100% of the 10 SCID mice tested; the mean +/- S.D. PRA was 75 +/- 20, and the mean + S.D. OD activity was 0.412 +/- 0.17. All cytokine genes were, otherwise, expressed in the presence or absence of CD40 blockade. The results suggest a potential role of an enhanced CD40/CD40L interaction in the sustenance of alloreactive antibody production without significant deviation to T helper-like I or II responses. Blocking the CD40/CD40L pathway may have a potential therapeutic benefit to treat sensitized uremic patients.

A Prospective Analysis of the Immunogenicity of Cryopreserved Nonvalved Allografts Used in Pediatric Heart Surgery

Background —The purpose of this study was to prospectively determine the immunogenicity of nonvalved allograft tissue used to repair congenital heart defects.

Methods and Results —We prospectively analyzed the immune response of 11 children, 1.4 months to 10 years of age, who required nonvalved allografts to alleviate stenosis during repair of congenital heart defects. In 7 patients, pulmonary arterial grafts were used; in 3 patients, monocusp pulmonary artery grafts were used; and in 1 patient, a section of glutaraldehyde-preserved allograft pericardium was used. We measured the level of HLA panel-reactive antibody (PRA) before surgery, 1 week after, 1 month after, and 3 months after surgery. PRA was determined by the antiglobulin technique and flow cytometry. HLA class I and class II antibodies measured by either technique were negligible before and 1 week after surgery. Nine of 11 patients (82%) exhibited a significant immune response at 1 month after surgery that further increased at 3 months. The measured PRA for class I antibodies with the antiglobulin technique increased to 43±36% at 1 month and to 69±38% at 3 months after surgery. Flow cytometry class I PRA measurements were similar. Class II PRA increased to 26±34% at 1 month and to 41±36% at 3 months. Age negatively correlated with the degree of elevation of PRA, but neither allograft area nor the area indexed to patient body surface area correlated with PRA.

Conclusions —Cryopreserved nonvalved allografts induce a strong HLA antibody response in the majority of children.

A limited number of HLA epitopes are recognized from HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients

The goal of this study was to evaluate the epitope specificity of HLA class I-specific antibodies detected in the serum of sensitized patients awaiting retransplantation. The study group consisted of 22 sensitized from previous graft patients, who produced stable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies. A total of 60 serum samples were screened and analyzed by two techniques in parallel: the antihuman globulin augmented CDC (AHG-CDC) technique and an ELISA technique. All recipients and donors were typed for class I HLA antigens by a standard lymphocytotoxicity technique. The epitope identification was based on class I HLA antigens sequencing, where the multiple immunogenic epitopes are differentially shared among various HLA antigens. The unique epitope configuration on one HLA antigen represents the private epitope of the specific HLA antigen while epitopes shared by more than one HLA antigen represent public determinants. In some HLA antigens (HLA-A1), more than one private epitope has been defined, while in others (HLA-B35, -B51), the private epitopes are not yet known. In a total of 36 antibody reactivity patterns, the majority of the definable IgG HLA class I-specific antibodies corresponded to the A-locus (75%), and only 25% had specificities against the B-locus antigens, although the number of incompatibilities concerning both loci were almost identical (29 for the HLA antigens of the A-locus and 26 for those of B-locus). All patients produced HLA class I-specific antibodies with specificities against the private epitopes of the immunogenic mismatched HLA antigen(s). In 6/21 cases (28.6%), HLA class I alloreactivity spreading to nongraft HLA antigens was detected and 9 public (shared) immunogenic alloepitopes were recognized. In conclusion, appling the epitope analysis of HLA class I-specific antibodies produced by sensitized from previous graft patients, we were able to define the immunogenic alloepitopes. We consider that the immunogenic alloepitopes, during transplantation course, are mainly private epitopes of mismatched HLA antigens and, in certain cases, shared epitopes between the donor alloantigens and other HLA antigens. This knowledge may offer the potential of transplanting sensitized patients through improved donor selection.