Susceptibility of lung transplants to preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies as detected by flow cytometry

Outcomes after flow cytometry crossmatch-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization

Our program previously reported successful outcomes following virtual crossmatch (VXM)-positive lung transplants managed with perioperative desensitization, but our ability to stratify their immunologic risk was limited without flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) data before 2014. The aim of this study was to determine allograft and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival following VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants, which are performed at a minority of programs due to the high immunologic risk and lack of data on outcomes. All first-time lung transplant recipients between January 2014 and December 2019 were divided into 3 cohorts: VXM-negative (n = 764), VXM-positive/FCXM-negative (n = 64), and VXM-positive/FCXM-positive (n = 74). Allograft and CLAD-free survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Five-year allograft survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 64% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 57% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .7171). Five-year CLAD-free survival was 53% in the VXM-negative cohort, 60% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-negative cohort, and 63% in the VXM-positive/FCXM-positive cohort (P = .8509). This study confirms that allograft and CLAD-free survival of patients who undergo VXM-positive/FCXM-positive lung transplants with the use of our protocol does not differ from those of other lung transplant recipients. Our protocol for VXM-positive lung transplants improves access to transplant for sensitized candidates and mitigates even high immunologic risk.

Pathology of Lung Rejection: Cellular and Humoral Mediated

Acute rejection is an important risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, the clinical manifestation of chronic airway rejection in lung allograft recipients. Patients with acute rejection might be asymptomatic or present with symptoms that are not specific and can be also seen in other conditions. Clinical tests such as pulmonary function tests and imaging studies among others usually are abnormal; however, their results are also not specific for acute rejection. Histopathologic features of acute rejection in adequate samples of transbronchial lung biopsy of the lung allograft are currently the gold standard to assess for acute rejection in lung transplant recipients. Acute alloreactive injury can affect both the vasculature and the airways. Currently, the guidelines of the 2007 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus conference are recommended for the histopathologic assessment of rejection. There are no specific morphologic features recognized to diagnose antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allografts. Therefore, the diagnosis of AMR currently requires a “triple test” including clinical features, serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies, and pathologic findings supportive of AMR. Complement 4d deposition is used to support a diagnosis of AMR in many solid organ transplants; however, its significance for the diagnosis of AMR in lung allografts is not entirely clear. This chapter discusses the currently recommended guidelines for the assessment of cellular rejection of lung allografts and summarizes our knowledge about morphologic features and immunophenotypic tests that might help in the diagnosis of AMR.

Lung Transplantation

The therapeutic options for patients with advanced pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disorders are currently limited. Lung transplantation remains one of the few viable interventions, but on account of the insufficient donor pool only a minority of these patients actually undergo the procedure each year. Following transplantation there are a number of early and late allograft complications such as primary graft dysfunction, allograft rejection, infection, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder and late injury that is now classified as chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The pathologist plays an essential role in the diagnosis and classification of these myriad complications. Although the transplant procedures are performed in selected centers patients typically return to their local centers. When complications arise it is often the responsibility of the local pathologist to evaluate specimens. Therefore familiarity with the pathology of lung transplantation is important.

Antibody-mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation

There has been increasing awareness of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as an important cause of graft failure after lung transplantation in recent years. However, the diagnostic criteria for pulmonary AMR are not well defined. All four tenets of AMR in kidney and heart transplantation, graft dysfunction, complement component deposition, circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSA), and histopathologic changes consistent with AMR, are infrequently present in lung transplantation. Nonetheless, the lung transplant community has made important progress recognizing cases of AMR and developing a definition. However, AMR is often refractory to therapy resulting in graft failure and death. In this review, we discuss the progress and challenges in the diagnosis and therapeutic options for pulmonary AMR. In addition, we briefly examine emerging paradigms of C4d-negative AMR and chronic AMR, and conclude that significant progress is needed to mitigate the effects of humoral immune responses after lung transplantation.

Immunoglobulin (Ig)G purified from human sera mirrors intravenous Ig human leucocyte antigen (HLA) reactivity and recognizes one's own HLA types, but may be masked by Fab complementarity-determining region peptide in the native sera

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) reacted with a wide array of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, in contrast to normal sera, due possibly to the purification of IgG from the pooled plasma. The reactivity of IgG purified from normal sera was compared with that of native sera to determine whether any serum factors mask the HLA reactivity of anti-HLA IgG and whether IgG purified from sera can recognize the HLA types of the corresponding donors. The purified IgG, unlike native sera, mirrored IVIg reactivity to a wide array of HLA-I/-II alleles, indicating that anti-HLA IgG may be masked in normal sera - either by peptides derived from soluble HLA or by those from antibodies. A < 3 kDa peptide from the complementarity-determining region (CDR) of the Fab region of IgG (but not the HLA peptides) masked HLA recognition by the purified IgG. Most importantly, some of the anti-HLA IgG purified from normal sera - and serum IgG from a few donors - indeed recognized the HLA types of the corresponding donors, confirming the presence of auto-HLA antibodies. Comparison of HLA types with the profile of HLA antibodies showed auto-HLA IgG to the donors' HLA antigens in this order of frequency: DPA (80%), DQA (71%), DRB345 (67%), DQB (57%), Cw (50%), DBP (43%), DRB1 (21%), A (14%) and B (7%). The auto-HLA antibodies, when unmasked in vivo, may perform immunoregulatory functions similar to those of therapeutic preparations of IVIg.

Antibody desensitization therapy in highly sensitized lung transplant candidates

As HLAs antibody detection technology has evolved, there is now detailed HLA antibody information available on prospective transplant recipients. Determining single antigen antibody specificity allows for a calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) value, providing an estimate of the effective donor pool. For broadly sensitized lung transplant candidates (cPRA ≥ 80%), our center adopted a pretransplant multi-modal desensitization protocol in an effort to decrease the cPRA and expand the donor pool. This desensitization protocol included plasmapheresis, solumedrol, bortezomib and rituximab given in combination over 19 days followed by intravenous immunoglobulin. Eight of 18 candidates completed therapy with the primary reasons for early discontinuation being transplant (by avoiding unacceptable antigens) or thrombocytopenia. In a mixed-model analysis, there were no significant changes in PRA or cPRA changes over time with the protocol. A sub-analysis of the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) change indicated a small decline that was significant in antibodies with MFI 5000-10,000. Nine of 18 candidates subsequently had a transplant. Posttransplant survival in these nine recipients was comparable to other pretransplant-sensitized recipients who did not receive therapy. In summary, an aggressive multi-modal desensitization protocol does not significantly reduce pretransplant HLA antibodies in a broadly sensitized lung transplant candidate cohort.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the Achilles' heel of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), most commonly manifest as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), continues to be highly prevalent and is the major limitation to long-term survival. The pathogenesis of BOS is complex and involves alloimmune and nonalloimmune pathways. Clinically, BOS manifests as airway obstruction and dyspnea that are classically progressive and ultimately fatal; however, the course is highly variable, and distinguishable phenotypes may exist. There are few controlled studies assessing treatment efficacy, but only a minority of patients respond to current treatment modalities. Ultimately, preventive strategies may prove more effective at prolonging survival after lung transplantation, but their remains considerable debate and little data regarding the best strategies to prevent BOS. A better understanding of the risk factors and their relationship to the pathological mechanisms of chronic lung allograft rejection should lead to better pharmacological targets to prevent or treat this syndrome.

Fulminant hyperacute rejection after unilateral lung transplantation

Hyperacute rejection (HAR) is a well-known complication in renal and cardiac transplantation, but rare in lung recipients. We present a case of HAR of the lung graft with a fatal outcome of a male patient with preformed class II anti-HLA antibodies.

HLA class I sensitization in islet transplant recipients: report from the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising treatment option for patients severely affected with type 1 diabetes. This report from CITR presents pre- and posttransplant human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I sensitization rates in islet-alone transplantation. Data came from 303 recipients transplanted with islet-alone between January 1999 and December 2008. HLA class I sensitization was determined by the presence of anti-HLA class I antibodies. Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) from prior to islet infusion and at 6 months, and yearly posttransplant was correlated to measures of islet graft failure. The cumulative number of mismatched HLA alleles increased with each additional islet infusion from a median of 3 for one infusion to 9 for three infusions. Pretransplant PRA was not predictive of islet graft failure. However, development of PRA >20% posttransplant was associated with 3.6-fold (p < 0.001) increased hazard ratio for graft failure. Patients with complete graft loss who had discontinued immunosuppression had significantly higher rate of PRA ≥ 20% compared to those with functioning grafts who remained on immunosuppression. Exposure to repeat HLA class I mismatch at second or third islet infusions resulted in less frequent development of de novo HLA class I antibodies when compared to increased class I mismatch. The development of HLA class I antibodies while on immunosuppression is associated with subsequent islet graft failure. The risk of sensitization may be reduced by minimizing the number of islet donors used per recipient, and in the absence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, repeating HLA class I mismatches with subsequent islet infusions.

Increased erythrocyte C4D is associated with known alloantibody and autoantibody markers of antibody-mediated rejection in human lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Immune responses to mismatched donor human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are important in the pathogenesis of chronic rejection. This study evaluated whether erythrocyte-bound C4d (E-C4d) is associated with known alloimmune and autoimmune markers of antibody-mediated rejection after human lung transplantation (LTx).

METHODS

Flow cytometry was used to analyze 22 LTx recipients and 15 healthy individuals for E-C4d. Development of antibodies to donor-mismatched HLA (donor-specific antibody [DSA]) and antibodies to HLA were determined using the solid-phase method by Luminex. Development of antibodies to self-antigens, K-alpha-1-tubulin (KA1T) and collagen V (Col-V), were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. C3d deposition in lung biopsy specimens was determined by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

Percent E-C4d (%E-C4d) levels were 19.9% in LTx patients vs 3.7% in healthy individuals (p = 0.02). DSA+ patients had higher E-C4d levels than DSA- patients (34.1% vs 16.7%, p = 0.02). In 5 patients with preformed anti-HLA, E-C4d levels were not significantly different vs 13 patients without detectable anti-HLA (p = 0.1). E-C4d levels were higher in patients who developed antibodies to KA1T (p = 0.02) and Col-V (p = 0.03). Recipients with C3d-positive tissue deposition had higher E-C4d levels than patients with C3d-negative biopsy results (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased %E-C4d levels are found in patients with positive DSA, high antibody titers to KA1T and Col-V, and have C3d+ lung biopsy findings. Therefore, %E-C4d can serve as a potential marker for antibody-mediated rejection after LTx.

Risk factors for early primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a registry study

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality in lung transplantation. We sought to identify risk factors for PGD using the United Network for Organ Sharing/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplant (UNOS/ISHLT) Registry.

METHODS

A total of 6984 lung transplants between 1994 and 2002 were available for analysis. Potential risk factors were tested for association with PGD and multivariable logistic regression was applied to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of PGD was 10.7% (95% CI 9.9-11.4). In multivariable analyses, factors independently associated with PGD were donor age >45 yr (p < 0.001); donor head trauma (p = 0.03); recipient body mass index >25 kg/m(2) (p = 0.005); recipient female gender (p = 0.001); use of Eurocollins preservation solution (p = 0.001); single lung transplant (p = 0.005); increased ischemic time (p < 0.001); and elevated recipient pulmonary artery systolic pressure at transplant (p < 0.001). Recipient transplant diagnosis was strongly associated with PGD, with primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.001 for both), and idiopathic (p < 0.001) or secondary pulmonary fibrosis (p = 0.011) as significant and independent risk factors for PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for PGD in the UNOS/ISHLT registry are consistent with prior smaller studies. Recipient, donor, and therapy variables are independently associated with PGD, as defined in a large registry.

Lung

Experiments with animals in the 1940 and 1950s demonstrated that lung transplantation was technically possible [33]. In 1963, Dr. James Hardy performed the first human lung transplantation. The recipient survived 18 days, ultimately succumbing to renal failure and malnutrition [58]. From 1963 through 1978, multiple attempts at lung transplantation failed because of rejection and complications at the bronchial anastomosis. In the 1980s, improvements in immunosuppression, especially the introduction of cyclosporin A, and enhanced surgical techniques led to renewed interest in organ transplantation. In 1981, a 45-year-old-woman received the first successful heart–lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) [106]. She survived 5 years after the procedure. Two years later the first successful single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [128] was reported, and in 1986 the first double lung transplantation for emphysema [25] was performed.

Pathogenesis, management, and consequences of primary graft dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction continues to be a major contributing factor to morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. This condition is presumed to be the result of ischemia-reperfusion injury, which is associated with the release of endogenous substances that can activate the innate immune system. Primary graft dysfunction has been shown to be an independent risk factor for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome indicating that it can shape alloimmune responses. In this review, we focus on the classification, pathogenesis, possible prevention strategies, management and consequences of primary graft dysfunction.

De novo production of K-alpha1 tubulin-specific antibodies: role in chronic lung allograft rejection

Lung transplantation is the treatment option for a variety of end-stage pulmonary diseases. Posttransplant development of Abs against donor HLA and non-HLA Ags have been associated with acute and chronic rejection of transplanted organs. Development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) following lung transplantation has been correlated with de novo production of anti-donor-HLA Abs. However, only a portion of the patients with BOS demonstrate detectable anti-donor-HLA Abs. Airway epithelium is considered as a major target for lung allograft rejection. In this study we demonstrate that many BOS(+) patients (12 of 36) develop Abs reactive to epithelial cell Ag that are distinct from HLA. Furthermore, de novo production of antiepithelial cell Ab precedes clinical onset of BOS. N-terminal sequencing and blastx analysis as well as blocking with K-alpha1 tubulin-specific Ab identified the epithelial Ag as K-alpha1 tubulin. Binding of the de novo-produced anti-K-alpha1 tubulin Abs to the airway epithelial cells resulted in the increased expression of transcription factors (TCF5 and c-Myc), leading to increased expression of fibrogenic growth factors, activation of cell cycle signaling, and fibroproliferation, the central events in immunopathogenesis of BOS following human lung transplantation.

Pediatric lung transplantation: perspectives for the pathologist

Lung transplantation offers life-saving and life-extending treatment for children and adolescents with congenital and acquired forms of pulmonary and pulmonary vascular disease, for whom medical therapy is ineffective or insufficient for sustained response. This review summarizes the pathology related to lung transplantation for the practicing pediatric pathologist and also highlights aspects of lung transplantation unique to the pediatric population. Clinical issues related to availability of organs, candidate eligibility, surgical technique, and postoperative monitoring are discussed. Pathologic evaluation of routine surveillance transbronchial biopsies requires attention to acute cellular rejection, opportunistic infection, and other forms of acute and resolving lung injury. These findings are correlated in some cases with endobronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage as adjunctive tools in surveillance. Open or thoracoscopic biopsies also have diagnostic utility in cases with acute or chronic graft deterioration of uncertain etiology. Future challenges in pediatric lung transplantation are similar to those in the adult population, with continued efforts focused on prolonging graft survival, prevention of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome due to chronic cellular rejection, and evaluation of humoral rejection.

Retransplant candidates have donor-specific antibodies that react with structurally defined HLA-DR,DQ,DP epitopes

This report describes a detailed analysis how donor-specific HLA class II epitope mismatching affects antibody reactivity patterns in 75 solid organ transplant recipients with an in situ allograft and who were considered for retransplantation. Sera were tested for antibodies in a sensitive antigen-binding assay (Luminex) with single class II alleles. Their reactivity was analyzed with HLAMatchmaker, a structural matching algorithm that considers so-called eplets to define epitopes recognized by antibodies. Only 24% of the patients showed donor-specific anti-DRB1 antibodies and there was a significant correlation with a low number of mismatched DRB1 eplets. This low detection rate of anti-DRB1 antibodies may also be due to allograft absorption. In contrast, antibodies to DRB3/4/5 mismatches were more common. Especially, 83% of the DRB4 (DR53) mismatches resulted in detectable antibodies against an eplet uniquely found on DR53 antigens. Donor-specific DQB mismatches led to detectable anti-DQB antibodies with a frequency of 87%. Their specificity correlated with eplets uniquely found on DQ1-4. The incidence of antibodies induced by 2-digit DQA mismatches was 64% and several eplets appeared to play a dominant role. These findings suggest that both alpha and beta chains of HLA-DQ heterodimers have immunogenic epitopes that can elicit specific antibodies. About one-third of the sera had anti-DP antibodies; they reacted primarily with two DPB eplets and an allelic pair of DPA eplets. These data demonstrate that HLA class II reactive sera display distinct specificity patterns associated with structurally defined epitopes on different HLA-D alleles.

Hyperacute Rejection After Lung Transplantation Caused by Undetected Low-titer Anti-HLA Antibodies

Hyperacute rejection is an early complication of transplantation, caused by the presence in the recipient of pre-formed donor-directed antibodies (Ab). We report a case of fatal early graft dysfunction after lung transplantation in a female recipient with no anti-HLA Ab detected before transplantation. Further immunologic studies revealed the presence, in the pre-transplant serum, of low-titer anti-HLA Ab directed against the donor's HLA, detectable only by flow-cytometry screening for panel-reactive antibodies. This observation emphasizes the importance of sensitive Ab detection in patients awaiting lung transplantation. Women should be specifically targeted for such sensitive Ab detection.

Presensitization accelerates chronic allograft rejection in a heterotopic rat tracheal allograft model with immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

In the field of organ transplantation, the effect of pretransplant humoral allosensitization on the organ transplant outcome has been highlighted. To clarify the correlation of presensitization with chronic rejection that can lead to a poor prognosis in transplant recipients, we examined humoral alloreactivity and allograft rejection in sensitized recipients by using a rat heterotopic tracheal transplant model.

METHODS

An MHC fully incompatible combination strain was used in this study. Lewis (LEW) rats sensitized by transplantation with Brown Norway (BN) skin grafts received tracheal segments from BN rats in the dorsal subcutaneous pouch. Four allogenic groups (n=5) were investigated. Group 1, non-sensitized recipients without cyclosporine A (CsA) administration; group 2, non-sensitized recipients with CsA administration; group 3, sensitized recipients without CsA administration; and group 4, sensitized recipients with CsA administration. In the immunosuppressant groups (groups 2 and 4), the recipients were administered a subcutaneous injection of CsA (25 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) for 3 days from the day of operation. All recipients were sacrificed 21 days after transplantation. Tracheal segments were extracted from the recipients and histologically evaluated with regard to the following parameters: (1) airway lining epithelial loss, (2) lymphocyte/plasma cell infiltration, and (3) luminal obliteration due to granulation tissue formation and/or fibrosis. In order to analyze alloantibody (allo-Ab) responses, sera samples were tested by the flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM) technique.

RESULTS

Histological findings revealed that the chronic rejection score in sensitized recipients treated with CsA was significantly higher than that in non-sensitized recipients treated with CsA (9.0+/-1.2 vs. 3.0+/-0.54, p<0.05). In other words, CsA therapy reduced the rejection score in non-sensitized recipients, but not in sensitized recipients. No significant differences were observed in the level of IgM Abs among the groups. However, donor-specific IgG Abs were induced after presensitization by donor skin grafting prior to tracheal transplantation. Heterotopic tracheal implantation also induced IgG Ab production. This elevation in the Ab levels was inhibited by CsA treatment in non-sensitized recipients. Conversely, the Ab levels were significantly higher in sensitized recipients than in non-sensitized recipients, regardless of CsA administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that presensitization accelerates chronic allograft rejection with a marked elevation in the level of donor specific IgG Abs. These results suggest that presensitization will be a significant risk factor for the lung transplant recipient, furthermore, the effect of immunosuppression might be insufficient in sensitized recipients.

A significant role for histocompatibility in human islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

In recent years, transplantation of islets and pancreas has become a viable option for patients debilitated with type I diabetes. The success of islet transplantation has been attributed to the ability to isolate high quality islets for transplantation and capacity to maintain the recipient's immunosuppressive levels within a specific target range following transplantation. The purpose of this study was to determine the role of pretransplant sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in islet transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed seven patients that were transplanted with islets under the auspices of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and Islet Cell Resource Center/National Institutes of Health. Humoral sensitization towards donor antigens both prior to and following islet transplantation was detected by FLOW panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and donor-specific cellular sensitization was detected by performing enzyme-linked immunospot assay analysis for cytokines interferon-gamma and interleukin-2.

RESULTS

Our analysis demonstrates that humoral and cellular sensitization to histocompatibility antigens prior to and after islet transplantation are associated with the failure of transplanted islets

CONCLUSION

Patient selection based on sensitization to donor HLA may be one of the factors crucial for the success of islet transplant. Further, in some patients, rejection of islets can be associated with sensitization to mismatched donor histocompatibility antigens.

Role of Flow Cytometry to Define Unacceptable HLA Antigens in Lung Transplant Recipients with HLA-Specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

Antidonor HLA-specific antibodies have been associated with hyperacute rejection and primary graft failure in lung transplant recipients. Thus, transplant candidates with HLA-specific antibodies generally undergo prospective crossmatching to exclude donors with unacceptable HLA antigens. However, the need to perform a prospective crossmatch limits the donor pool and is associated with increased waiting list times and mortality. A virtual crossmatch strategy using flow cytometry, which enables precise determination of HLA-specific antibody specificity, was compared to prospective crossmatching in sensitized lung transplant candidates.

METHODS

In all, 341 lung transplant recipients were analyzed retrospectively (April 1992 to July 2003). Sixteen patients with HLA-specific antibodies underwent transplantation based on flow cytometric determination of antibody specificity and 10 underwent prospective crossmatching.

RESULTS

Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) at three years was similar in those undergoing a virtual crossmatch, those undergoing prospective crossmatching, and those without HLA-specific antibodies (80.4% +/- 13.4, 85.7% +/- 13.2, and 73.8% +/- 2.8, respectively, P = 0.88). Three-year survival was also comparable (87.5% +/- 8.3, 70.0% +/- 14.5, and 78.5% +/- 2.4, respectively, P = 0.31). Elimination of prospective crossmatching for sensitized patients was associated with a significant decrease in time on the waiting list (P < 0.01) and in waiting list mortality (P < 0.05). All 16 patients undergoing a virtual crossmatch had negative retrospective crossmatches.

CONCLUSIONS

By carefully determining the specificity of HLA-specific antibodies, flow cytometry methodologies enable the prediction of negative crossmatch results with up to 100% accuracy, enabling the determination of appropriateness of donors. Using this virtual crossmatch strategy, crossmatching can be safely omitted prior to lung transplantation, thereby decreasing waiting list time and mortality rates for candidates with HLA-specific antibodies.

Allograft Rejection After Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapy for selected patients with advanced lung disease. One of the main limitations to successful lung transplantation is rejection of the transplanted organ. This article discusses the clinical presentation, treatment, and prevention of hyperacute, acute, and chronic rejection in the lung transplant recipient.

C4d deposition in lung allografts is associated with circulating anti-HLA alloantibody

The complement activation demonstrated by vascular C4d deposition is used to diagnose antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in renal allografts, but remains controversial in lung transplantation (LTX).

METHODS

C4d deposition was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 192 lung transplant biopsies from 32 patients. ELISA analysis was performed on 415 serum samples in those 32 temporally and rejection-grade matched LTX patients; 16 patients developed HLA-Ab, while the other 16 patients remained negative. The specificity of C4d staining was further compared in 18 additional LTX patients without HLA-Ab or acute cellular rejection (ACR), but in the presence of CMV-pneumonitis or reperfusion injury.

RESULTS

Specific subendothelial C4d deposition was seen in 5 of 16 (31%) patients with HLA-Ab and was absent in 16 patients without HLA-Ab (p<0.05). All patients with specific C4d deposition exhibited donor-specific HLA-Ab. There were 13 patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in the group of 16 HLA-Ab positive patients, versus 2/16 in ELISA-negative patients (p<0.005). One of 7 patients with CMV pneumonitis and 2 of 11 patients with reperfusion injury also showed C4d positivity (not statistically significant).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, specific subendothelial C4d deposition was a marker for the involvement of HLA-Ab in lung allograft rejection. The patchy nature, low sensitivity, and specificity of C4d staining might limit clinical use in protocol biopsies. However, in patients with decreasing pulmonary function, refractory ACR and/or HLA-Ab, specific C4d deposition may serve as a marker of coexistent AMR.

Utility of Peritransplant and Rescue Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Extracorporeal Immunoadsorption in Lung Transplant Recipients Sensitized to HLA Antigens

The role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in lung transplantation is not fully clear. The presence of pretransplant third-party anti-HLA antibodies or the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies has been associated with acute posttransplant complications, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and early mortality in some studies. However, little has been reported regarding the utility of desensitization therapy in sensitized lung transplant recipients. For approximately 3 years, desensitization therapy consisting of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and, in most instances, extracorporeal immunoadsorption (ECI) has been administered peritransplant to lung transplant recipients at our institution with third-party anti-HLA antibodies or as rescue therapy to those who develop de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Notably, the administration of peritransplant desensitization therapy to these patients has been associated with improvement in several clinical parameters, including acute rejection and BOS. Furthermore, administration of rescue IVIG with or without ECI has been associated with an overall improvement in the rate of pulmonary function decline. Our experience suggests that desensitization therapy may be beneficial for lung transplant recipients with pretransplant or de novo anti-HLA antibodies. We discuss the appropriateness and clinical impact of IVIG and ECI in sensitized lung transplant recipients as well as cellular mechanisms that may contribute.

Correlation between human leukocyte antigen antibody production and serum creatinine in patients receiving sirolimus monotherapy after Campath-1H induction

BACKGROUND

In this study, we determined whether Campath-1H induction followed by sirolimus monotherapy inhibited alloantibody production in renal transplantation. Second, we evaluated the correlation between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody production and serum creatinine levels.

METHODS

Sera were taken 1 to 24 months after transplantation from 24 patients treated with Campath-1H and sirolimus and tested for serum creatinine and HLA-specific antibody by using flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Ten (42%) of the 24 patients treated with Campath-1H and sirolimus produced HLA antibodies. Six of these 10 developed both donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and non-donor-specific antibodies (NDSAs), whereas only NDSAs were detected in the other four patients. In patients with biopsy-diagnosed humoral rejection (C4d+), serum levels of both DSA and NDSA significantly correlated with patient serum creatinine levels. Rejection treatment successfully reduced both DSAs and NDSAs and reversed humoral rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The numeric relationship between serum creatinine and DSA levels suggests a causal relationship between alloantibody and transplant rejection.

HLA-Specific antibodies are associated with high-grade and persistent-recurrent lung allograft acute rejection

BACKGROUND

The impact of HLA-specific antibodies is not well established in the acute rejection of lung allografts. Acute rejection represents the most important risk factor for the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

METHODS

We analyzed the pattern of HLA antibodies before and after transplantation in 54 patients, and correlated our data with the presence and frequency of high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, during the first 18 post-operative months. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on histologic International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT)-published criteria.

RESULTS

Ten of 54 patients had a positive enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) post-transplantation. In 90% of ELISA-positive patients, the presence of HLA antibodies was associated with persistent-recurrent acute rejections, compared with 34% in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.005). There were 28 high-grade acute rejection episodes in the ELISA-positive group, compared with 36 in the ELISA-negative group (p < 0.0001). The ELISA-positive patients required a greater intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. The patients with ELISA-detected anti-HLA antibodies were at least 3-fold more likely to develop high-grade acute rejection and persistent-recurrent acute rejection, and 7-fold more likely to develop multiple episodes of persistent-recurrent acute rejection, compared with ELISA-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ELISA-based screening for the development of HLA antibodies is a reliable method that can identify lung transplant recipients at increased risk for high-grade and persistent-recurrent acute rejection. Although bronchiolitis obliterans appears as a point of no return in the evolution of lung-transplanted patients, early detection of risk factors for acute rejection could indirectly decrease the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans. These lung-transplanted patients may benefit from an altered strategy of immunosuppression.

Acute humoral rejection of human lung allografts and elevation of C4d in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Antibody-mediated rejection is well established for renal allografts but remains controversial for lung allografts. Cardinal features of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts include antibodies to donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and evidence for antibody action, such as complement activation demonstrated by C4d deposition. We report a lung allograft recipient with circulating antibodies to donor HLA who failed treatment for acute cellular rejection but responded to therapy for humoral rejection. To address the second criteria for antibody-mediated rejection, we determined whether complement activation could be detected by measuring C4d in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by ELISA. Airway allergen challenge of asthmatics activates the complement pathway; therefore, we used BALF from asthmatics pre- and post-allergen challenge to measure C4d. These controls demonstrated that ELISA could detect increases in C4d after allergen challenge. BALF from the index patient had elevated C4d concomitant with graft dysfunction and anti-donor HLA in the absence of infection. Analysis of BALF from 25 additional lung allograft recipients showed that C4d concentrations >100 ng/mL were correlated with anti-HLA antibodies (p = 0.006), but were also observed with infection and in asyptomatic patients. The findings support the occurrence of anti-HLA-mediated lung allograft rejection and suggest that C4d measurement in BALF may be useful in diagnosis.

Anti-HLA antibody analysis and crossmatching in heart and lung transplantation

Although the clinical significance of anti-HLA antibodies in heart and lung transplantation is less well studied than in renal transplantation, several studies have shown that heart and lung recipients transplanted in the presence of donor-specific antibodies are at increased risk for early acute rejection and have a lower graft survival. In an effort to avoid any increase in organ ischemia time, heart and lung candidates with anti-HLA antibodies have to be identified prior to transplantation and crossmatches performed with donor materials obtained prior to organ recovery. Both class I and II antibodies have been found to be associated with chronic rejection, defined in heart transplantation as transplant-related coronary artery disease (TRCAV) and in lung transplantation as obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) or bronchiolitis obliterative syndrome (BOS). Post-transplant de novo development of donor antigen-specific class II antibodies has been found to be especially deleterious, significantly increasing the risk of chronic rejection and poor graft outcome. Based on the review of studies regarding the development of anti-HLA antibodies and thoracic organ allograft rejection several conclusions can be drawn. The presence of class I and II-directed anti-HLA antibodies, detected by any method, are associated with acute and chronic rejection in heart and lung transplantation. Different therapeutic strategies have been used pre-transplantation to decrease the level of anti-HLA antibodies and post-transplantation to maintain low antibody levels or treat rejection, thereby improving graft outcome. Thus, monitoring the presence and the level of anti-HLA antibodies is prognostic of graft outcome and allows for measurement of therapeutic efficacy.

Use of C4d as a diagnostic adjunct in lung allograft biopsies

PURPOSE

Humoral allograft rejection is a defined mechanism for cardiac and renal graft dysfunction; C4d deposition, a stable component of complement activation, inversely correlates with graft survival. With the recent recognition of humoral rejection in lung grafts, we examined C4d's role as a prognostic adjunct in lung allografts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three lung recipients underwent biopsies for deterioration in clinical status or routine surveillance. Clinically unwell patients possessed acute rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Biopsies attributable to infection were excluded from the study. In addition to routine light microscopy, an attempt was made to correlate the clinical status and morphologic findings with the pattern of C4d deposition and also to compare these clinical and morphologic parameters with the other assessed immunoreactants. Panel reactive antibody testing was also carried out at various points in their post transplantation course whereby in 6 of the cases the samples were procured at exactly the same time as the tissue samples.

RESULTS

The patients were segregated into two groups: those patients with recurrent acute rejection and those with BOS. In those patients with symptomatic acute rejection, all biopsies showed light microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence of humoral allograft rejection. The level of C4d was positively correlated with the degree of parenchymal injury, the hallmark being one of septal capillary necrosis. In addition, high and intermediate levels of C4d correlated with a clinical diagnosis of acute rejection. C4d was the strongest predictor of parenchymal injury and of the clinical status (p <.0001) compared to other the immunoreactants C1q, C5b-9 and immunoglobulin. There was no specific correlation between C4d deposition and the presence of acute cellular rejection. In those patients fulfilling clinical criteria of BOS, deposits of C4d as well as other immunoreactants were found in the bronchial wall as opposed to the rarity of this finding in bon-BOS patients. However the only statistically significant predictor of BOS was bronchial wall deposition of C1q. In no case were panel reactive antibodies at significant levels discovered post transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of acute rejection, C4d deposition correlates with clinical evidence of rejection and the degree of humoral rejection assessed pathologically; there is no association with the presence of histocompatibility related antibodies. It is a more specific predictor of allograft status compared to other immunoreactants. C4d deposition within the bronchial wall is a feature of BOS and hence may be used as a marker of chronic graft dysfunction. The antigenic target resulting in C4d deposition may not be histocompatibility related.

Humoral theory of transplantation

According to the humoral theory of transplantation, antibodies cause allograft rejection. Publications are cited showing that antibodies: (1). cause hyperacute kidney rejection, (2). lead to C4d deposits associated with early kidney graft failures, (3). are a good indicator of presensitization leading to early acute rejections, (4). were present in 96% of 826 patients who rejected a kidney graft, (5). are associated with chronic rejection in 33 studies of kidney, heart, lung and liver grafts, and (6). in three studies, appeared in the circulation BEFORE evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplants, and BEFORE kidney rejection. In addition, a prospective cooperative study of 1629 patients in 24 centers demonstrated that antibodies foretold subsequent failures after a follow-up period of 6 months (p = 0.05). The specificity of antibodies detected in the serum of rejecting patients were often not donor specific, presumably because they were absorbed by the rejecting organ. If the humoral theory is accepted, even provisionally, transplanted patients who have antibodies could be treated with immunosuppression until the antibodies disappear to determine whether chronic rejection can be blocked. If successful, in patients who do not have antibodies, immunosuppression could be reduced until antibodies appear.

Improved flow cytometric detection of donor-specific HLA class II antibodies by heat inactivation

Flow cytometry is a powerful technique for T-cell crossmatching but is prone to false-positive reactions with B cells. In this study the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) was performed in 319 cases, using the patient's serum untreated and incubated at 56 degrees C for 30 minutes. Heat treatment inhibited B-cell reactivity in 30 of 39 cases. Flow cytometry testing with latex beads coated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II antigens showed no class II antibodies in sera that were completely inhibited by heat treatment. There was no inhibition of class I antibodies to either T or B cells, or of class II antibodies to B cells. Experiments with aggregated IgG showed that inhibition by heat treatment is likely due to the prevention of complement binding to aggregates or dissociation of aggregates, or both. We conclude that heat inactivation is a simple step that eliminates false-positive reactions in the B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch.

Positive serum crossmatch as predictor for graft failure in HLA-mismatched allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of patient sera for complement-fixing anti-donor antibodies (serum crossmatch [XM]) before allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation (BSCT) is routine in most centers. However, in contrast to kidney transplantation, the predictive value of a positive XM for outcome of BSCT is still unclear, and a positive XM is presently not regarded as an absolute contraindication to proceed to transplant.

METHODS

To clarify the role of a positive XM as predictor for overall survival (OS) and graft failure (GF) after BSCT, a retrospective, single-center, matched-pair analysis was performed. Enrolled were all XM-positive BSCT performed at our institution from 1985 to 2000 (n=30). Controls (n=30) were matched for disease, disease stage, patient age, period of transplant, conditioning regimen, protocol for prevention of graft-versus-host disease, and type of donor (related vs. unrelated, HLA-identical vs. HLA-mismatched).

RESULTS

Multivariate statistical analysis of all enrolled 60 transplants revealed GF as the all-dominating, independent risk factors for low OS (relative risk [RR]: 59.5, P<0.0001). Univariate (Kaplan-Meier) analysis could attribute inferior OS and high incidence of GF to the subgroup of HLA-mismatched, XM-positive transplants (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A XM should always be performed in patients awaiting a BSCT from HLA-mismatched donors, because a positive XM is a predictor for inferior OS due to GF in BSCT.

Analysis of early deaths after isolated lung transplantation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the causes of death in patients dying within 30 days after lung transplantation at the University of Florida, to assess the importance of several diagnostic modalities for determining the causes of their decline, and to construct an algorithm for the evaluation of patients with severe respiratory compromise occurring early after lung transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical records and pathology slides from all patients dying within 30 days after lung transplantation, and biopsy specimen diagnoses from all lung allograft recipients at the University of Florida.

PATIENTS

Nine deaths occurred during the first 30 days after transplantation among 117 patients undergoing 123 isolated lung transplantation operations.

RESULTS

Infections accounted for the greatest number of deaths (bacterial pneumonia, four patients; catheter-related bacteremia, one patient). Persistent pneumonia confirmed by biopsy specimen was usually accompanied by histologic manifestations of acute cellular rejection and was associated with poor patient outcome (ie, death or subsequent development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome). In two patients, antibody-mediated rejection either was the immediate cause of death (hyperacute rejection, one patient) or preceded a fatal case of pneumonia (accelerated antibody-mediated rejection, one patient). Other causes of death included hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy secondary to an intraoperative cardiac arrest (one patient), pulmonary venous thrombosis with bacterial colonization of the thrombotic material (one patient), and ischemic reperfusion injury (one patient). In most patients, more than one type of diagnostic technique was needed to ascertain the cause of the catastrophic decline.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of early posttransplant death in our patient group included infections, antibody-mediated rejection, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy secondary to cardiac arrest, pulmonary venous thrombosis, and ischemic reperfusion injury. Because these processes often demonstrate overlapping clinical and morphologic features requiring multiple diagnostic techniques for resolution, a systematic multimodality approach to diagnosis is advantageous for determining the causes of decline in individual patients and for estimating the incidences of the different causes of early graft and patient loss in the lung transplant population.