A large, single center investigation of the immunogenetic factors affecting liver transplantation

HLA matching between donors and recipients improves clinical liver transplant graft survival

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The importance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching between liver transplant donors and recipients on graft survival remains unclear and is not a clinical consideration in liver transplantation. This study aimed to determine the relationship between HLA matching and liver graft survival using a large-scale multi-centre database (UNOS/OPTN) and multivariate logistic analysis. The secondary aim was to determine whether this relationship was influenced by transplant indication and donor status.

METHODS

This retrospective observational analysis was performed using 22 702 liver transplant recipients from the UNOS/OPTN database. Patients were divided into two groups based on number of HLA mismatches (0-3 mismatches vs. 4-6 mismatches) and then subcategorized by indication and donor status. Risk-adjusted outcomes were assessed by multivariate Cox analysis adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics and visualized using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Allograft survival and risk of acute rejection were associated with degree of HLA mismatch. This association between HLA mismatch and graft survival persisted in individuals who underwent transplant for hepatitis, metabolic, drug toxicity, and congenital indications. Donor status also influenced the relationship between HLA mismatch and graft survival. Graft survival in DBD recipients was longer than in DCD in the 4-6 HLA mismatch group, whereas no significant difference was found in the 0-3 HLA mismatch group.

CONCLUSION

HLA mismatch significantly reduced graft survival and increased risk of acute rejection. This association was noted only in specific indications. These findings are of potential clinical relevance to organ allocation, allograft matching algorithms, immunosuppression protocols, and transplant surveillance.

The Effect of Genetic HLA Matching on Liver Transplantation Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

We aim to investigate the effects of genetically based HLA matching on patient and graft survival, and acute and chronic rejection after liver transplantation.

Background

Liver transplantation is a common treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. In contrast to most other solid organ transplantations, there is no conclusive evidence supporting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching for liver transplantations. With emerging alternatives such as transplantation of bankable (stem) cells, HLA matching becomes feasible, which may decrease the need for immunosuppressive therapy and improve transplantation outcomes.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of genetic HLA matching on liver transplantation outcomes (acute/chronic rejection, graft failure, and mortality).

Results

We included 14 studies with 2682 patients. HLA-C mismatching significantly increased the risk of acute rejection (full mismatching: risk ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.08 to 3.33, P = 0.03; partial mismatching: risk ratio = 1.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.07 to 1.66, P = 0.01). We did not discern any significant effect of HLA mismatching per locus on acute rejection for HLA-A, -B, -DR, and -DQ, nor on chronic rejection, graft failure, or mortality for HLA-DR, and -DQ.

Conclusions

We found evidence that genetic HLA-C matching reduces the risk of acute rejection after liver transplantation while matching for other loci does not reduce the risk of acute rejection, chronic rejection, graft failure, or mortality.

The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation

Donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living-donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990-2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between-siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0-10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult-to-adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA-B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11-5.35; p = 0.03) in between-siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor-recipient relationships are parent-to-child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children.

Donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen A mismatching is associated with hepatic artery thrombosis, sepsis, graft loss, and reduced survival after liver transplant

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is not routinely performed for liver transplantation as there is no consistent evidence of benefit; however, the impact of HLA mismatching remains uncertain. We explored the effect of class I and II HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality. A total of 1042 liver transplants performed at a single center between 1999 and 2016 with available HLA typing data were included. The median follow-up period was 9.38 years (interquartile range 4.9-14) and 350/1042 (33.6%) transplants resulted in graft loss and 280/1042 (26.9%) in death. Graft loss and mortality were not associated with the overall number of mismatches at HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DR, and HLA-DQ loci. However, graft failure and mortality were both increased in HLA mismatching on graft failure and mortality the presence of one (p = 0.004 and p = 0.01, respectively) and two (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively) HLA-A mismatches. Elevated hazard ratios for graft failure and death were observed with HLA-A mismatches in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Excess graft loss with HLA-A mismatch (138/940 [14.7%] mismatched compared with 6/102 [5.9%] matched transplants) occurred within the first year following transplantation (odds ratio 2.75; p = 0.02). Strikingly, transplants performed at a single all grafts lost due to hepatic artery thrombosis were in HLA-A-mismatched transplants (31/940 vs. 0/102), as were those lost due to sepsis (35/940 vs. 0/102). In conclusion, HLA-A mismatching was associated with increased graft loss and mortality. The poorer outcome for the HLA-mismatched group was due to hepatic artery thrombosis and sepsis, and these complications occurred exclusively with HLA-A-mismatched transplants. These data suggest that HLA-A mismatching is important for outcomes following liver transplant. Therefore, knowledge of HLA-A matching status may potentially allow for enhanced surveillance, clinical interventions in high-risk transplants or stratified HLA-A matching in high-risk recipients.

Influence of Preformed Antibodies in Liver Transplantation

The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching and preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation remains unclear. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of DSAs in a large cohort of 810 liver recipients undergoing liver transplant to determine the influence on acute (AR) or chronic liver rejection (CR), graft loss and allograft survival. DSAs were identified using complement dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-CM) and multiplexed solid-phase-based flow cytometry assay (Luminex). CDC-CM showed that a 3.2% of liver transplants were positive (+CDC-CM) with an AR frequency of 19.2% which was not different from that observed in negative patients (-CDC-CM, 22.3%). Only two patients transplanted with +CDC-CM (7.6%) developed CR and suffered re-transplant. +CDC-CM patients showed a significantly lower survival rate compared to -CDC-CM patients (23.1% vs. 59.1%, p = 0.0003), developing allograft failure within the first three months (p < 0.00001). In conclusion, we have demonstrated a relationship between the presence of preformed DSAs and the low graft liver survival, indicating the important role and the potential interest of performing this analysis before liver transplantation. Our results could help to detect patients with an increased risk of graft loss, a better choice of liver receptors as well as the establishment of individualized immunosuppressive regimens.

Do Recipients of Genetically Related Donors Have Better Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

There are few data on genetic relation of the donor and outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. We compared outcomes of LDLT between recipients of genetically related and unrelated donors in a large single-center series.

METHODS

The study included 1372 adult, ABO-compatible, primary LDLT recipients, who received a graft from either a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, son, or daughter; n = 756) or unrelated donor (spouse or relative of the spouse; n = 616).

RESULTS

The mean age of the recipients with a related donor was 50.2 ± 10.8 years compared with 47.3 ± 9.3 years for recipients with unrelated donors (P = 0.000). Chronic rejection was significantly more common in the genetically unrelated donor group than in the genetically related donor group (28 [4.5%] versus 9 [1.1%]; P = 0.000) at a mean follow-up of 37 months (15-95 months). There were no significant differences in other outcomes between the 2 groups. The 12-month and 36-month survival between the unrelated and related groups was 87.6% versus 90%, and 86.3% versus 89.7% respectively (P = 0.115). The multivariate analysis revealed genetically unrelated donors (odds ratio [OR]: 3.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.80-8.34, P = 0.001) and history of acute cellular rejection (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.68-6.81, P = 0.001) as predictors of chronic rejection.

CONCLUSION

Although chronic rejection was found to be more common in genetically unrelated donors, the patient survival after LDLT was similar.

The impact of human leukocyte antigen donor and recipient serotyping and matching on liver transplant graft failure in primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cholangitis

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) serotyping is not considered to have significant impact on liver graft survival and does not factor into U.S. organ allocation. Immune-related liver diseases such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) have been speculated to represent a disease subgroup that may have significantly different graft outcomes depending on HLA donor/recipient characterization. The aim of this study was to investigate whether HLA serotyping/matching influenced post-transplant graft failure for immune-related liver diseases using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. From 1994 to 2015, 5665 patients underwent first-time liver-only transplants for PSC, AIH, and PBC with complete graft survival and donor/recipient HLA data. Graft failure was noted in 38.6% (2188/5665), and all groups had comparable 5-year graft survival (75.1%-78.8%, P = 0.069). The overall degree of, and loci-specific mismatch level, did not influence outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression noted increased graft failure risk for recipient HLA-B7, HLA-B57, HLA-B75, HLA-DR13 and donor HLA-B55, HLA-B58, and HLA-DR8 for PSC patients, protective effects for recipient HLA-DR1 and HLA-DR3 for AIH patients, and increased risk for HLA-DR7 for AIH patients. These findings warrant further investigation to evaluate the impact of HLA serotyping on post-transplant outcomes.

Role of Human Leukocyte Antigen Compatibility in Graft Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE

The influence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch on liver transplantation has been widely studied, but is still controversial. The aim of this large single-center study was to analyze the role of HLA compatibility between donor and recipient in the graft outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 925 recipients who had undergone LDLT between March 2001 and April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. HLA typing was performed using a standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity technique. The degree and type of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR mismatch were assessed. We also investigated the posttransplantation laboratory data, incidence of rejection, recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV), and graft survival as outcome parameters.

RESULTS

The type of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR mismatch had no effect on rejection episodes, whereas the beneficial effect of a much lower degree (0-2) of HLA mismatch was notable. Recipients with 2 HLA-B mismatches or recipients with a higher degree of mismatch were associated with elevated bilirubin level, a higher recurrence rate of HBV, and inferior graft survival. A complete mismatch of 2 at the DR locus also decreased graft survival in LDLT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed that the degree of HLA mismatch, as well as the locus-specific type of HLA mismatch, namely B and DR, play a major role in graft outcomes after LDLT. To obtain an improved graft outcome, HLA compatibility should be considered in the setting of LDLT, which provides sufficient time to select a more favorable donor-recipient combination.

Survival without biliary complications after liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVES

Patients who have a liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis may develop recurrent disease and biliary complications, organ loss necessitating revision liver transplant, or death. We evaluated long-term outcomes in patients who had liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 71 patients who had a liver transplant for end-stage liver disease because of primary sclerosing cholangitis, a retrospective review was done to evaluate biliary complication-free survival, transplanted organ survival, and death. Human leukocyte antigen typing and matching were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 39 patients (55%) who had biliary complications, loss of the liver transplant, or death at a mean 12.1 years after transplant. The 5- and 10-year event-free survival reached 74.6% and 45% (53 patients after 5 years, and 32 patients after 10 years). Male sex of transplant recipients was a significant risk factor for biliary complications, revision liver transplant, or death. Most patients had inflammatory bowel disease, primarily ulcerative colitis. The human leukocyte antigen profile or number of mismatches had no effect on complication-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary complications, revision liver transplant, and death are a useful combined primary endpoint for recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplant.

HLA variants related to primary sclerosing cholangitis influence rejection after liver transplantation

AIM: To investigate influence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and killer immunoglobuline-like receptor (KIR) genotypes on risks of acute rejection (AR) after liver transplantation (LTX).

METHODS: In this retrospective study we included 143 adult donor-recipient pairs with a minimum of 6 mo follow-up after LTX for whom DNA was available from both donor and recipients. Clinical data, all early complications including episodes and severity of AR and graft/patient survival were registered. The diagnosis of AR was based on clinical, biochemical and histological criteria. All suspected episodes of AR were biopsy confirmed. Key classical HLA loci (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C and HLA-DRB1) were genotyped using Sanger sequencing. 16 KIR genes were genotyped using a novel real time PCR approach which allows for determination of the diploid copy number of each KIR gene. Immunohistochemical staining for T (CD3), B (CD20) and natural killer (NK) cells (CD56 and CD57) were performed on liver biopsies from 3 different patient groups [primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), primary biliary cirrhosis and non-autoimmune liver disease], 10 in each group, with similar grade of AR.

RESULTS: Fourty-four (31%) patients were transplanted on the basis of PSC, 40% of them had AR vs 24% in the non-PSC group (P = 0.04). No significant impact of donor-recipient matching for HLA and KIR genotypes was detected. In the overall recipient population an increased risk of AR was detected for HLA-B*08 (P = 0.002, OR = 2.5; 95%CI: 1.4-4.6), HLA-C*07 (P = 0.001, OR = 2.4; 95%CI: 1.4-4.0) and HLA-DRB1*03 (P = 0.03, OR = 1.9; 95%CI: 1.0-3.3) and a decreased risk for HLA-DRB1*04 (P = 0.001, OR = 0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.5). For HLA-B*08, HLA-C*07 and DRB1*04 the associations remained evident in a subgroup analysis of non-PSC recipients (P = 0.04, P = 0.003 and P = 0.02, respectively). In PSC recipients corresponding P values were 0.002, 0.17 and 0.01 for HLA-B*08, HLA-C*07 and DRB1*04, respectively. A dosage effect of AR prevalence according to the PSC associated HLA alleles was also notable in the total recipient population. For HLA-B*08 the frequency of AR was 56% in HLA-B*08 homozygous recipients, 39% in heterozygous recipients and 21% in recipients lacking HLA-B*08 (P = 0.02). The same was observed for the HLA-C*07 allele with AR in 57%, 27% and 18% in recipients being homozygous, heterozygous and lacking HLA-C*07 respectively (P = 0.003). Immunohistochemical analysis showed similar infiltration of T, B and NK cells in biopsies with AR in all three groups.

CONCLUSION: We found significant associations between the PSC-associated HLA-B*08, HLA-C*07, HLA-DRB1*03 and HLA-DRB1*04 alleles and risk of AR in liver transplant recipients.

Pretransplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies as predictors of early allograft rejection in ABO-compatible liver transplantation

The significance of preexisting donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSAs) for liver allograft function is unclear. Our previous studies have shown that humoral alloreactivity frequently accompanies acute cellular rejection (ACR). In the present study, we set out to determine whether pretransplant HLA-DSAs correlate with clinically significant ACR in the first 90 days after transplantation and, if so, to determine their predictive values. Class I HLA-DSAs and class II HLA-DSAs were determined by single-antigen bead flow cytometry for 113 consecutive adult transplants. A statistical analysis was performed for data from 109 consecutive patients with graft survival greater than or equal to 90 days. All patients who developed biochemical graft dysfunction underwent liver biopsy for hematoxylin-eosin and complement component 4d staining. Cox proportional hazards models and associated hazard ratios revealed a significant association of pretransplant HLA-DSAs with clinically significant ACR: this association started with a mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) as low as 300 for both class I (hazard ratio = 2.7, P  < 0.01) and class II (hazard ratio = 6.0, P  < 0.01). Pretransplant HLA-DSAs were associated with an increased risk of ACR: P  < 0.01 for class I (42% versus 18%), P  < 0.001 for class II (37% versus 7%), and P  < 0.001 for either class I or II (36% versus 3%). Class I or II HLA-DSAs with an MFI ≥ 1000 had the best positive predictive value for clinically significant ACR at 46%, whereas class I or II HLA-DSAs with an MFI ≥ 300 had the best negative predictive value at 97.1%. Although our study was based on consecutive patients, it was limited by the relatively low number of single-center subjects. In conclusion, the present study indicates that pretransplant HLA-DSAs, even at low levels of allosensitization, correlate with the risk of clinically significant ACR. Our findings suggest that anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies could serve as donor-specific markers of immunoreactivity to the liver graft.

The effect of a positive T-lymphocytotoxic crossmatch on clinical outcomes in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation

Purpose

There is controversy concerning the effect of a positive T-lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (TLC) on clinical outcomes in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TLC on clinical outcomes in LDLT and to determine how long a pretransplant positive TLC continues after liver transplantation (LT).

Methods

Between January 2005 and June 2010, 219 patients underwent adult LDLT at National Cancer Center. The TLC test was routinely performed before LDLT. TLC test results were positive in 8 patients (3.7%). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the result of TLC: positive TLC (n = 8) and negative TLC (n = 211) groups. All patients with a pretransplant positive TLC (n = 6) underwent a TLC test every week until negative conversion of TLC, except 2 patients who refused to receive the TLC test.

Results

Acute cellular rejection, surgical complications and patient or graft survival were not significantly different between both groups. All patients with a positive TLC (n = 6) had a posttransplant negative TLC. The median time to negative conversion of TLC was 1.5 weeks (range, 1 to 3 weeks).

Conclusion

A pretransplant positive TLC does not affect clinical outcomes in adult LDLT. Moreover, T-lymphocytotoxic cross-reactivity disappeared within 3 weeks (range, 1 to 3 weeks) after LT.

Does a positive pretransplant crossmatch affect long-term outcome in liver transplantation?

Despite the historical success of liver transplantation in the face of a positive lymphocytic crossmatch, increased incidence of acute cellular rejection and graft loss have been reported in this setting. Given the potential adverse effects of antirejection treatment, especially in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients, identification of predisposing factors could allow for better surveillance, avoidance of rejection, and potentially better graft outcomes.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on outcomes of liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

AIM: To assess the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching on liver graft outcome and acute rejection from a meta-analysis of available cohort studies.

METHODS: Articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from January 1970 to June 2009, including non-English literature identified in these databases, were searched. Only studies comparing HLA or sub-phenotype matching with mismatching were extracted. The percentage of graft survival was extracted by “Engauge Digitizer” from survival curves if the raw data were not displayed. A meta-analysis was performed when at least 3 studies provided data.

RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A lower number of HLA mismatches (0-2 vs 3-6) did reduce the incidence of acute rejection (relative risk: 0.77, P = 0.03). The degree of HLA mismatching (0-2 vs 3-6) had no significant effect on 1-year [hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, P = 0.68] and 5-year (HR: 1.09, P = 0.38) graft survival. In sub-phenotype analysis, the degree of HLA-A, B and DR mismatching (0 vs 1-2) had no significant effect on 1-year and 5-year graft survival, either. The HRs and P-values were 0.95, 0.71 (HLA-A, 1-year); 1.06, 0.60 (HLA-A, 5-year); 0.77, 0.16 (HLA-B, 1-year); 1.07, 0.56 (HLA-DR, 1-year); 1.18, 0.23 (HLA-DR, 5-year), respectively.

CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review imply that good HLA compatibility can reduce the incidence of acute rejection in spite of having no influence on graft outcomes. To obtain a short recovery time and minimize rejection post transplantation, HLA matching studies should be considered before the operation.

Human leukocyte antigen crossmatch testing is important for liver retransplantation

Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) crossmatching is often thought to be unnecessary for liver transplants (LTs), we provide evidence that for retransplants, it is essential. Sera from 139 retransplant patients who had received livers from deceased donors were retrospectively analyzed with single antigen beads on a Luminex platform for HLA antibodies. Each patient received at least 2 transplants and was followed up for at least 6 months from the second LT, which was deemed to have failed if the patient had a third LT or died. Second LT survival was calculated from the date of the second LT to the date of the third LT or death. Our study cohort consisted of 118 adult patients (> or = 18 years old) as well as 21 pediatric patients (<18 years old). Class I HLA antibodies were associated with significantly poorer regraft survival in adults [survival differences of 21.3% (P = 0.046), 22.1% (P = 0.042), and 23.7% (P = 0.033) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively]; however, the presence of these antibodies was not associated with significant survival differences in the pediatric population. A univariate analysis of the effect of class I antibodies on second LT survival in adults showed a hazard ratio of 2.0 (95% confidence interval = 1.0-3.8, P = 0.028). Graft survival in patients with and without HLA antibodies or class II antibodies was similar. Because class I antibodies have a deleterious effect on liver regraft survival, crossmatch testing should be performed before liver retransplantation.

HLA-B8, DR3: a new risk factor for graft failure after renal transplantation in patients with underlying immunoglobulin A nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype has been associated with high immune reactivity. In this study, we have tested whether this haplotype has differential effect on graft survival in patients with IgAN compared with control patients.

METHODS

From the Eurotransplant Registry we analyzed graft survival of 1207 recipients with IgAN and 7935 control patients with non-glomerular diseases. Death-censored graft loss according to the HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype was calculated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox-regression model was used to correct for various risk factors.

RESULTS

The frequency of the HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype was significantly lower in IgAN patients compared with controls (10.3% vs. 15.4%, p < 0.001). Ten-year graft survival was identical in the control group with and without the HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype (71.1% and 70.2%, respectively), but significantly worse in IgAN patients carrying the HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype compared with patients without it (52.5% vs. 69.1%, respectively, p = 0.009). The risk of graft loss was increased by 66% (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.14, 2.29) in IgAN with the HLA-B8, DR3 haplotype and independent of well-known risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified a new risk factor for graft loss unique to patients with IgAN. This finding emphasizes the exclusive immune characteristics of IgAN patients after transplantation.

Lymphocytotoxic crossmatch in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

To investigate the relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and the outcome after pediatric LDLT in a single center. The clinical data of 76 children undergoing 79 LDLTs including three retransplantations from May 2001 to January 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. All of the children had end-stage liver disease, and their median age was 1.4 yr (range, six months to 16.5 yr). Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine- or FK-based regimens with steroids. The children were classified into two groups (positive or negative) according to the pretransplant LCT results. The incidences of post-transplant surgical complications and of rejection episodes were compared. The relationship between the pretransplant LCT results and patient and graft survival rates was also analyzed. Seventy-nine pretransplant crossmatch tests were done; 13 (16.5%) were positive, and 66 (83.5%) were negative. No significant difference was found in the pretransplant clinical factors between two crossmatch groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of vascular and biliary tract complications, in the rate of early or steroid-resistant cellular rejections, or in one- and three-yr patient (91.7%, 91.7%, respectively, in the positive group, 93.5%, 93.5%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.80) and graft (92.3%, 92.3%, respectively, in the positive group, 88.8%, 86.4%, respectively, in the negative group, p = 0.63) survival. The present study demonstrates that there is no reason to do pretransplant LCT to select the living donor for pediatric LDLT.

Long-term outcome of human leukocyte antigen mismatching in liver transplantation: results of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database

A perfect or nearly perfect human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match has been associated with better immediate and long-term survival of diseased donor kidney transplants. However, the effect of HLA matching for hepatic allografts remains poorly defined. Using data from the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplantation Database, we investigated the association between HLA mismatches and hepatic allograft survival, disease recurrence, and immunosuppression interactions. A, B, and DR loci were used to calculate total mismatch scores of 0 (no mismatches in any loci) to 6 (mismatches in all loci). Seven hundred ninety-nine adults (male, 55%; female, 45%) underwent 883 liver transplants. The 10-year graft survival according to total mismatch score was as follows: 0-2, 60%; 3-4, 54%; and 5-6, 57%. There was a negative effect of mismatching at the A locus on patient survival, with shorter survival for patients with 1 or 2 mismatches compared with 0 mismatches [P = 0.05, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.6]. Patients on tacrolimus with 1 or 2 mismatches at B or DR loci appeared to have increased rates of patient and graft survival compared to patients with 0 mismatches, with the appearance of a protective effect of tacrolimus (HR = 0.67). The effect of HLA mismatching was more pronounced on certain disease recurrences. DR-locus mismatch increased recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis (P = 0.01, HR = 4.2) and primary biliary cirrhosis (P = 0.04, HR = 2). Mismatch in the A locus was associated with more recurrence of hepatitis C virus (P = 0.01, HR = 1.6) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (P = 0.03, HR = 2.9).

CONCLUSION

Mismatching at the A locus decreases patient survival in liver transplant recipients, and mismatching at the DR and A loci affects recurrence of autoimmune liver diseases and hepatitis C, respectively.

Detecting and monitoring human leukocyte antigen-specific antibodies

Renewed awareness of the relevance of HLA-specific antibodies to transplantation and the development of protocols to reduce or eliminate sensitization have made monitoring of antibodies and accurate interpretation of test results increasingly important. Here we review the various tests available and provide guidelines for the development of monitoring protocols.

Interface hepatitis is associated with a high incidence of late graft fibrosis in a group of tightly monitored pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation patients

Chronic graft dysfunction, manifesting with elevated liver enzymes and histological features of interface hepatitis (IH), is being increasingly recognized as a long-term problem after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to characterize our group of post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with respect to clinical, laboratory, and histological signs of IH. A retrospective study of charts and liver biopsy specimens from patients transplanted between 1986 and 1999 was used. Histological features of IH were found in 29/119 patients at a median interval of 23.9 months (95% confidence interval -28.2 to 52.6) after OLT. All patients with IH had risk factors for chronic rejection, such as steroid-resistant rejection, acute rejection later than 3 months post-OLT, female receiver of male graft, or pretransplant cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serology with a CMV-negative donor liver. None of the 29 had features favoring a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, but 4 had isolated hypergammaglobulinemia, and 4 had non-organ-specific autoantibodies without hyperimmunoglobulin G. Sixteen of 29 patients also had features of chronic rejection, such as foam cell arteriopathy, loss of bile ducts, or pericentral fibrosis. After abnormal biopsy, all but 1 patient were switched to tacrolimus. During a median follow-up of 12 years, death occurred in 5, retransplantation occurred in 7, and definite cirrhosis occurred in 4. In conclusion, IH was detected in 24.4% of our patients and was associated with a high degree of fibrosis development. Most likely, IH represents a form of chronic rejection directed against periportal hepatocytes.

Preformed antibodies detected by cytotoxic assay or multibead array decrease liver allograft survival: role of human leukocyte antigen compatibility

The significance of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility and preformed antibodies in liver transplantation remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate, in a single-center cohort comprising 896 liver transplants, whether the degree of donor-recipient compatibility and preformed antibodies modified graft survival. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that donor-recipient HLA compatibility had a marginal impact on allograft survival. As for compatibility at individual antigen loci, 2 mismatches at HLA-A conferred a survival advantage in retransplanted allografts (P = 0.011). HLA-B and HLA-DR loci did not play a significant role in outcome in any pathology. The concordance of results on preformed antibodies detected by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and a multiple bead assay (Luminex xMAP) showed a strong correlation between both techniques (P < 0.0001). Both CDC-detected and Luminex-detected antibodies were associated with shorter graft survival within the first year post-transplant (P = 0.01 and P = 0.016, respectively). Positive CDC T crossmatches and Luminex-detected HLA class II antibodies played a significant role in decreasing graft survival (P = 0.043 and P = 0.0019 at 1 year, respectively, and P = 0.005 and P = 0.038 at 5 years, respectively). A correlation was also observed between the presence of preformed Luminex-detected class II or Luminex I and II antibodies and allograft rejection (P = 0.001 and P = 0.042, respectively). In conclusion, although HLA typing is not a prerequisite for transplantation, screening of HLA antibodies with Luminex techniques and CDC crossmatch may be useful in the detection of at-risk patients that could benefit from increased surveillance and tailored therapy following transplantation.

Management of Anti-allogeneic Antibody Elimination by Apheresis in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

In this study, we report on the indications and efficacy of the elimination of antiallogeneic antibodies in living donor liver transplant recipients. Seven patients incompatible with the ABO-blood type were subjected to apheresis before transplantation. The procedure resulted in titers being decreased to less than a score of 8. After transplantation, apheresis was also performed in 6 cases and continuous hemodiafiltration in 1 case. In addition, three out of 11 ABO-blood type incompatible recipients were administered anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab). Two crossmatch positive patients were subjected to apheresis before transplantation, and in these cases the titers were reduced to less than a score of 2. Moreover, these two patients had no acute rejections after transplantation. We concluded that apheresis is effective for preventing acute rejection induced by pre-existing anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies, as well as antidonor specific antibodies, but is not effective in some patients who had accelerated humoral rejection.

Changes in Liver Graft Rejections Over Time

Incidence and possible risk factors of acute rejection, time to acute rejection, graft rejection within 3 months, multiple rejections within 1 year, steroid-resistant rejection, and graft lost to chronic rejection or to chronic dysfunction were evaluated in 388 liver transplantations. HLA matches, anti-HLA class I antibodies, positive crossmatch test, or positive cytomegalovirus serology did not have an effect on the occurrence of acute or chronic rejection. Increased total bleeding diminished occurrence of acute rejection, lengthened the time to acute rejection, and reduced the risk of steroid-resistant rejection. Immunological pretransplant factors did not have a major effect on the occurrence of rejection after liver transplantation. Different types of rejections diminished over time and the time period to the first acute rejection increased, although the basic immunosuppression stayed mainly the same over 20 years in our center.

Influence of donor/recipient HLA-matching on outcome and recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching on outcome, severity of recurrent hepatitis C and risk of rejection in hepatitis C positive patients after liver transplantation (LT). In a retrospective analysis, 165 liver transplants in patients positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) with complete donor/recipient HLA typing were reviewed for recurrence of HCV and outcome. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 158 months (median, 74.5 months). Immunosuppression consisted of either cyclosporine-A- or tacrolimus-based quadruple induction therapy including or an interleukin 2-receptor antagonist. Protocol liver biopsies were performed after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years and staged according to the Scheuer scoring system. The overall 1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival figures were 81.8%, 69.11 and 62%, respectively. There was no correlation in the study population between number of HLA mismatches and graft survival. The number of rejection episodes increased significantly in patients with more HLA mismatches (P < 0.05). In contrast to this, the fibrosis progression was significantly faster in patients with 0-5 HLA mismatches compared to patients with a complete HLA mismatch. In conclusion, HLA matching did not influence graft survival in patients after LT for end-stage HCV infection, however, despite less rejection episodes, the fibrosis progression increased in patients with less HLA mismatches within the first year after LT.

Marked Differences in acute cellular rejection rates between living-donor and deceased-donor liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

: Due to ongoing organ donor shortage, an increasing number of adult live-donor liver transplants (LDLT) are being performed. The aims of this study were to compare the incidence of ACR between recipients of live- and deceased-donor liver transplants, and to note any differences in ACR among related and unrelated living-donor recipients.

METHODS

: Sixty-four adults undergoing LDLT between 1998-2001 were closely matched with a deceased recipient. Statistical comparisons in ACR between the live- and deceased-donor groups were based on the differences between the ACR rates of each LDLT patient and the corresponding matched deceased recipient. Analyses were performed separately for pairs in which the living donor was not related to the recipient, was a nonsibling relative, or was a sibling.

RESULTS

: Live- and deceased-donor recipients underwent a similar number of liver biopsies. In all, 16/50 (32%) of the biopsied LDLT patients had ACR compared to 36/49 (73%) of the deceased-donor recipients. ACR rates of living donors and their deceased-donor matches did not differ significantly for the unrelated living donors, but did differ for the nonsibling related (P=0.03) and the sibling LDLT (P=0.03). The results were similar when comparing rates of high-degree ACR for unrelated, nonsibling related, and sibling pairs. High-degree ACR differences in the sibling LDLT group were significantly greater than in the nonsibling group (P=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

: Rates of ACR and high-degree ACR are decreased in living-related liver transplant recipients. This difference is likely genetically related as ACR rates are lower in recipient-donor pairs of increasing genetic similarity.

Influence of HLA compatibility and lymphocyte cross-matching on acute cellular rejection following living donor adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Reports on the relevance of immunogenetic factors in living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) are often conflicting or inconclusive. We therefore investigated the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, lymphocyte crossmatch positivity, and the reactivity in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) in a series of LDALT.

METHODS

A total of 104 LDALT patients were studied. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, and the graft survival rates were assessed. The incidence of the most common complications was analyzed. And the influence of HLA, the flow cytometric analysis findings, enhanced cytotoxic cross-matching and MLC on graft survival, and acute rejection was also investigated.

RESULTS

As a result, 96 negative cross-matching and eight positive cross-matching cases were identified. Positive cytotoxic cross-matching had a significant effect on graft survival (P<0.05), while flow cytometric cross-matching also had an additional effect on acute rejection (P<0.05). The MLC of the patients with three HLA mismatches was significantly higher than the MLC of patients with zero HLA mismatches. The incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) was higher in the patients with three mismatches than in the other patients, and moderate rejection only occurred in the patients with three mismatches.

CONCLUSION

HLA mismatching was not statistically associated with the overall graft survival after LDALT. The graft failure rates were higher in the positive cross-matching cases and therefore a strong immuosuppressant might be needed for positive cross-matching cases.

The effect of HLA mismatches, shared cross-reactive antigen groups, and shared HLA-DR antigens on the outcome after pediatric liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and HLA-DR mismatching, sharing cross-reactive antigen groups (CREGs), and sharing HLA-DR antigens on the outcome after pediatric liver transplantation. Outcome parameters were graft survival, acute rejection, and portal fibrosis. A distinction was made between full-size (FSLTx) and technical-variant liver transplantation (TVLTx). A total of 136 primary transplants were analyzed. The effect of HLA on the outcome parameters was analyzed by adjusted multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. HLA mismatches, shared CREGs, and shared HLA-DR antigens affected neither overall graft survival nor survival after FSLTx. Survival after TVLTx was superior in case of 2 mismatches at the HLA-DR locus compared to 0 or 1 mismatch (P = 0.01) and in case of no shared HLA-DR antigen compared to 1 shared HLA-DR antigen (P = 0.004). The incidence of acute rejection was not influenced by HLA. The incidence of portal fibrosis could be analyzed in 62 1-yr biopsies and was higher after TVLTx than FSLTx (P = 0.04). The incidence of portal fibrosis after TVLTx with 0 or 1 mismatch at the HLA-DR locus was 100% compared to 43% with 2 mismatches (P = 0.004). After multivariate analysis, matching for HLA-DR and matching for TVLTx were independent risk factors for portal fibrosis. In conclusion, an overall beneficial effect of HLA matching, sharing CREGs, or sharing HLA-DR antigens was not observed. A negative effect was present for HLA-DR matching and sharing HLA-DR antigens on survival after TVLTx. HLA-DR matching might be associated with portal fibrosis in these grafts.

Liver recipients harbouring anti-donor preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies exhibit a poor allograft survival at the first year after transplantation: experience of one centre

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the effect of the presence of anti-donor preformed alloantibodies in 268 liver allograft transplants. Crossmatches were performed by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay and HLA antibody screening by flow cytometry (FlowPRA). Positive anti-donor crossmatch was detected in 5.2% of transplants. Acute rejection frequency in +CDC crossmatch patients was not different from that observed in -CDC crossmatch patients. None of the patients transplanted with +CDC crossmatch developed chronic rejection, but they showed a significantly lower allograft survival rate, and the majority of them had allograft failures before the end of the first post-transplant year, mainly within the 3 first months. Indeed, positive FlowPRA determination was concordant with data from the CDC assay. In conclusion, these findings show a direct correlation between the presence of anti-donor preformed antibodies and a poor allograft survival in liver transplant.

Interferon-alpha therapy in liver transplant recipients: lack of association with increased production of anti-HLA antibodies

Interferon-alpha (IFN) is a useful treatment for active HCV infection. In kidney transplantation, IFN has been shown to trigger acute rejection with de novo anti-HLA antibodies. Interferon-alpha has not been reported to enhance the risk of acute rejection in HCV-positive liver transplant recipients (LTRs). Sera were collected from 44 LTRs greater than 6 months post-transplant. Sera were tested with ELISA for the presence and the specificity of anti-HLA antibodies. The prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies was 11% and was not significantly different in 13 HCV-positive recipients who received IFN, compared with 10 who did not receive IFN (8% vs. 20%), or with 21 HCV-negative recipients (10%). None of the patients had an acute rejection after starting IFN. In this study, LTRs receiving IFN did not have an increased frequency of anti-HLA antibodies. This may partially explain the safety of IFN previously reported in LTRs requiring antiviral therapy.

Development of donor-specific microchimerism in liver transplant recipient with HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 mismatch related to rejection episodes

Migration of donor-derived cells to recipient tissues after liver transplantation has been suggested as a mechanism to induce and maintain allograft tolerance, although important issues remain including acute rejection posttransplantation mortality, and complications related to immunosuppressive therapy. We therefore examined the relation of rejection to chimerism based upon recipient and donor mismatch of HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 alleles. Laboratory analysis of peripheral blood was performed before and 10 days to 16 months after liver transplantation in 32 recipients, using ganglion or spleen cell samples of respective donors. DNA was extracted for HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 allele typing using polymerase chain reactions with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Microchimerism was analyzed through nested PCR. Our results confirmed that patients with one or two mismatched HLA-DRB1 and-DQB1 alleles showed microchimerism and no rejection (P <.05). Microchimerism was present in 71.88% of the patients, and a significant association of rejection P <.05 was found when microchimerism was correlated to graft rejection. These results suggest that the presence of microchimerism may be associated with acceptance, tolerance and survival of the allograft.

Positive T lymphocytotoxic cross-match in living donor liver transplantation

The influence of lymphocytotoxic cross-match on survival or acute rejection in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not been well examined. We analyzed 133 consecutive adult LDLT cases and assessed patient survival and acute rejection rates. Patients with a positive T lymphocytotoxic cross-match (n = 12) had a significantly higher chance of rejection within 6 weeks of LDLT (67% versus 28%, P <.001). All of the rejection episodes were successfully treated with bolus methylprednisolone therapy or anti-T cell monoclonal antibody. T lymphocytotoxic cross-match-positive grafts had no influence on patient survival (79% versus 90% at 3 years, P =.91). The results show that a positive cross-match graft should not be considered a contraindication for LDLT.

Use of C4d as a diagnostic adjunct in lung allograft biopsies

PURPOSE

Humoral allograft rejection is a defined mechanism for cardiac and renal graft dysfunction; C4d deposition, a stable component of complement activation, inversely correlates with graft survival. With the recent recognition of humoral rejection in lung grafts, we examined C4d's role as a prognostic adjunct in lung allografts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-three lung recipients underwent biopsies for deterioration in clinical status or routine surveillance. Clinically unwell patients possessed acute rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Biopsies attributable to infection were excluded from the study. In addition to routine light microscopy, an attempt was made to correlate the clinical status and morphologic findings with the pattern of C4d deposition and also to compare these clinical and morphologic parameters with the other assessed immunoreactants. Panel reactive antibody testing was also carried out at various points in their post transplantation course whereby in 6 of the cases the samples were procured at exactly the same time as the tissue samples.

RESULTS

The patients were segregated into two groups: those patients with recurrent acute rejection and those with BOS. In those patients with symptomatic acute rejection, all biopsies showed light microscopic and immunofluorescent evidence of humoral allograft rejection. The level of C4d was positively correlated with the degree of parenchymal injury, the hallmark being one of septal capillary necrosis. In addition, high and intermediate levels of C4d correlated with a clinical diagnosis of acute rejection. C4d was the strongest predictor of parenchymal injury and of the clinical status (p <.0001) compared to other the immunoreactants C1q, C5b-9 and immunoglobulin. There was no specific correlation between C4d deposition and the presence of acute cellular rejection. In those patients fulfilling clinical criteria of BOS, deposits of C4d as well as other immunoreactants were found in the bronchial wall as opposed to the rarity of this finding in bon-BOS patients. However the only statistically significant predictor of BOS was bronchial wall deposition of C1q. In no case were panel reactive antibodies at significant levels discovered post transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of acute rejection, C4d deposition correlates with clinical evidence of rejection and the degree of humoral rejection assessed pathologically; there is no association with the presence of histocompatibility related antibodies. It is a more specific predictor of allograft status compared to other immunoreactants. C4d deposition within the bronchial wall is a feature of BOS and hence may be used as a marker of chronic graft dysfunction. The antigenic target resulting in C4d deposition may not be histocompatibility related.

Humoral theory of transplantation

According to the humoral theory of transplantation, antibodies cause allograft rejection. Publications are cited showing that antibodies: (1). cause hyperacute kidney rejection, (2). lead to C4d deposits associated with early kidney graft failures, (3). are a good indicator of presensitization leading to early acute rejections, (4). were present in 96% of 826 patients who rejected a kidney graft, (5). are associated with chronic rejection in 33 studies of kidney, heart, lung and liver grafts, and (6). in three studies, appeared in the circulation BEFORE evidence of bronchiolitis obliterans in lung transplants, and BEFORE kidney rejection. In addition, a prospective cooperative study of 1629 patients in 24 centers demonstrated that antibodies foretold subsequent failures after a follow-up period of 6 months (p = 0.05). The specificity of antibodies detected in the serum of rejecting patients were often not donor specific, presumably because they were absorbed by the rejecting organ. If the humoral theory is accepted, even provisionally, transplanted patients who have antibodies could be treated with immunosuppression until the antibodies disappear to determine whether chronic rejection can be blocked. If successful, in patients who do not have antibodies, immunosuppression could be reduced until antibodies appear.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen matching in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibilities are beneficial in the setting of kidney transplantation but have demonstrated inconclusive results after liver transplantation. On the basis of recent controversial reports, the authors analyzed the impact of HLA matching in their patients after liver transplantation under modern immunosuppressive drug regimens and new HLA typing techniques with respect to outcome and adverse immunologic events.

METHODS

Data from 924 transplants with complete donor-recipient HLA typing were retrospectively analyzed. Immunosuppression was commenced as either cyclosporine A- or tacrolimus-based therapy in different protocols. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 144.8 months (median, 66 months).

RESULTS

The actuarial graft survival was 88% after 1 year and 78.7% after 5 years and was similar in tacrolimus- and cyclosporine A-treated patients. However, cyclosporine A-treated patients underwent significantly more rejection episodes. The number of HLA compatibilities had no influence on graft survival, whereas the number of acute rejections was significantly less in transplants with more HLA compatibilities (P<0.05). Graft survival tended to be improved in patients with chronic hepatitis B and more HLA compatibilities (P=0.05). In contrast, graft survival in transplants for primary sclerosing cholangitis was significantly impaired in the presence of one or two HLA-DR compatibilities (P<0.05). In addition, in autoimmune hepatitis, survival tended to be lower in the presence of more HLA compatibilities (P=0.1). Overall graft survival or frequency of adverse immunologic events was not influenced by any specific donor-recipient HLA allele.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated fewer acute rejections in transplants with more HLA compatibilities. However, in liver transplantation, a more specific investigation of HLA typing may be necessary, because in some indications HLA antigens play a role in the nature of the disease. Therefore, recurrence of autoimmune disease may be more severe in patients sharing HLA antigens.

The natural history of acute histologic rejection without biochemical graft dysfunction in orthotopic liver transplantation: a systematic review

Protocol biopsy results in the first few weeks after liver transplantation sometimes display histologic features of acute cellular rejection (ACR), even in the absence of significant clinical or biochemical dysfunction. At present there is no clear consensus about the need to treat such cases with adjuvant immunosuppression. This systematic review describes, from the available evidence, the natural history of untreated histologic ACR in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction. An electronic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to select studies that reported protocol liver biopsies in the early posttransplant period from 1983 to 2000. Studies that identified patients with ACR on protocol biopsy who were not treated with adjuvant immunosuppression formed the basis of the study group. Data from individual studies were extracted using standardized pro forma and pooled for descriptive analysis. The search identified 3431 studies, of which 516 were cited in full. Of these, 15 studies met all of the inclusion criteria. These 15 studies reported on 1566 patients who had protocol biopsies performed in the early posttransplant period, of which 1048 (67%) had histologic evidence of ACR. Three hundred and thirty one (32%) patients with histologic ACR on protocol biopsy had no associated biochemical graft dysfunction. Without treatment, only 14% of these patients subsequently developed biochemical graft dysfunction requiring adjuvant immunosuppression. Steroid-resistant rejection and chronic rejection both had a prevalence of 4% in patients with untreated histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction. Withholding adjuvant immunosuppression from patients with histologic ACR and no biochemical graft dysfunction seems to be safe, as long as graft function is carefully monitored. The rationale for performing protocol biopsies in the absence of biochemical graft dysfunction is questionable.

Syngeneic living-donor liver transplantation without the use of immunosuppression

Transplantation between monozygotic twins has been successfully performed using the kidney, small intestine, and pancreas. Identical HLA matching has enabled these individuals to be transplanted without the need for immunosuppressive medication. Liver transplantation without immunosuppression would lessen the risk of recurrent viral hepatitis and eliminate much of the morbidity associated with long-term use of immunosuppressive medication. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been performed with increasing success in recent years without an opportunity arising to use a monozygotic twin as a donor. We report 2 cases of LDLT between identical twins wherein perfect haploidentity has allowed these recipients to be transplanted without the need for immunosuppression. Although HLA matched genotypically, there may be differences in anatomy between donor and recipient. Mild liver chemistry test abnormalities may occur after transplant despite the absence of immunosuppression.

Antibody elimination by apheresis in living donor liver transplant recipients

In the present study, we investigated retrospectively the indications and the efficacy of the elimination of preexisting antiallogeneic antibodies in liver transplant recipients. Three patients who were ABO blood type incompatible were subjected to plasmapheresis and double filtration plasmapheresis before the living donor liver transplantation (LDLTx), and the titers decreased to less than 8. After transplantation, plasmapheresis was also performed in 3 cases, and continuous hemodiafiltration in 1 case, and in 2 out of these 3 patients acute rejection was recognized. Two patients who were crossmatch positive were subjected to plasmapheresis before transplantation, and the T warm titers were reduced to less than Score 2. These 2 patients had no acute rejections after transplantation. We conclude that in liver transplant patients apheresis is effective to prevent acute rejection induced by preexisting anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies and anti-donor specific antibodies before transplantation, but it is not effective in a patient with accelerated humoral rejection occurring after transplantation.

Risk factors for chronic rejection after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic rejection is a major cause of graft failure and a frequent reason for retransplantation after pediatric liver transplantation. Identification of risk factors for chronic rejection in pediatric transplant recipients is vital to understanding the pathogenesis of chronic rejection and may help prevent further graft loss.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 285 children with 385 liver transplants performed at University of Chicago between 1991 and 1999. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for chronic rejection, including age, sex, race, type of graft (living related vs. cadaveric), native liver disease, acute rejection episodes, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).

RESULTS

The chronic rejection rate was significantly lower in recipients of living-related grafts than in recipients of cadaveric grafts (4% vs. 16%, P=0.001). African-American recipients had a significantly higher rate of chronic rejection than did Caucasian recipients (26% vs. 8%, P<0.001). Numbers of acute rejection episodes, transplantation for autoimmune disease, occurrence of PTLD, and CMV infection were also significant risk factors for chronic rejection. However, recipient age, gender, donor-recipient gender mismatch, and donor-recipient ethnicity mismatch were not associated with higher incidence of chronic rejection

CONCLUSION

We have identified a number of risk factors for chronic rejection in a large group of pediatric liver allograft recipients. We believe that donor-recipient matching for gender or race is not likely to reduce the incidence of chronic rejection. The elucidation of the mechanisms by which living-related liver transplantation affords protection against chronic rejection may provide insight into the immunogenetics of chronic rejection and help prevent further graft loss.

Role of cytokine gene polymorphisms in acute rejection and renal impairment after liver transplantation

Although immunosuppressive regimens are effective, rejection occurs in up to 50% of patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and there is concern about side effects from long-term therapy. Knowledge of clinical and immunogenetic variables may allow tailoring of immunosuppressive therapy to patients according to their potential risks. We studied the association between transforming growth factor-beta, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) gene polymorphisms and graft rejection and renal impairment in 121 white liver transplant recipients. Clinical variables were collected retrospectively, and creatinine clearance was estimated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault. Biallelic polymorphisms were detected using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. Thirty-seven of 121 patients (30.6%) developed at least 1 episode of rejection. Multivariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh score (P =.001), immune-mediated liver disease (P =.018), normal pre-OLT creatinine clearance (P =.037), and fewer HLA class 1 mismatches (P =.038) were independently associated with rejection. Renal impairment occurred in 80% of patients and was moderate or severe in 39%. Clinical variables independently associated with renal impairment were female sex (P =.001), pre-OLT renal dysfunction (P =.0001), and a diagnosis of viral hepatitis (P =.0008). There was a significant difference in the frequency of TNF-alpha-308 alleles among the primary liver diseases. After adjustment for potential confounders and a Bonferroni correction, the association between the TNF-alpha-308 polymorphism and graft rejection approached significance (P =.06). Recipient cytokine genotypes do not have a major independent role in graft rejection or renal impairment after OLT. Additional studies of immunogenetic factors require analysis of large numbers of patients with appropriate phenotypic information to avoid population stratification, which may lead to inappropriate conclusions.

Immune activation is required for the induction of liver allograft tolerance: implications for immunosuppressive therapy

Liver transplants in many animal models are unusual because often they are not rejected even when transplanted across complete major histocompatibility complex barriers without immunosuppression. Their paradoxical behavior is even more obvious when the immune mechanism of acceptance is examined. Instead of acceptance resulting from a lack of immune response to the graft, the opposite occurs, and there is an unusual extensive increase in immune activation in acceptance compared with rejection. This abnormal extensive immune activation is driven by donor leukocytes transferred with the liver and results in death of the recipient cells that would normally reject the transplant. Some forms of immunosuppression inhibit this activation-associated liver transplant tolerance. The significance of these findings and possible means to design future treatment protocols for clinical transplantation that optimize management of liver transplant recipients are discussed.