Randomized trial of blood eosinophil count monitoring as a guide to corticosteroid dosage adjustment after heart transplantation

Immunosuppression in liver and intestinal transplantation

Immunosuppression handling plays a key role in the early and long-term results of transplantation. The development of multiple immunosuppressive drugs led to numerous clincial trials searching to reach the ideal regimen. Due to heterogeneity of the studied patient cohorts and flaws in many, even randomized controlled, study designs, the answer still stands out. Nowadays triple-drug immunosuppression containing a calcineurin inhibitor (preferentially tacrolimus), an antimetabolite (using mycophenolate moffettil or Azathioprine) and short-term steroids with or without induction therapy (using anti-IL2 receptor blocker or anti-lymphocytic serum) is the preferred option in both liver and intestinal transplantation. This chapter aims, based on a critical review of the definitions of rejection, corticoresistant rejection and standard immunosuppression to give some reflections on how to reach an optimal immunosuppressive status and to conduct trials allowing to draw solid conclusions. Endpoints of future trials should not anymore focus on biopsy proven, acute and chronic, rejection but also on graft and patient survival. Correlation between early- and long-term biologic, immunologic and histopathologic findings will be fundamental to reach in much more patients the status of operational tolerance.

Topical corticosteroids do not revert the activated phenotype of eosinophils in eosinophilic esophagitis but decrease surface levels of CD18 resulting in diminished adherence to ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and endothelial cells

Swallowed topical corticosteroids are the standard therapy for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in adults. Eosinophils in the blood of untreated EoE patients have an activated phenotype. Our aim was to determine if corticosteroids restore the phenotype of eosinophils to a healthy phenotype and if certain cell-surface molecules on blood eosinophils correlate with eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. Levels of eight surface markers on eosinophils from treated and untreated EoE patients were determined by flow cytometry and analyzed using multivariate methods of pattern recognition. Corticosteroid-treated EoE patients' eosinophils had decreased levels of CD18 compared to both untreated patients and healthy controls, but maintained their activated phenotype. CD18 expression correlated positively with eosinophil numbers in the esophagus and promoted the adherence of eosinophils to ICAM-1, ICAM-2, and to endothelial cells. The diminished expression of CD18 may be one mechanism behind the reduced entry of eosinophils into the esophagus in corticosteroid-treated EoE patients.

Steroids in kidney transplant patients

Any evaluation of steroids in kidney transplantation is hampered by individual variability in metabolism, the lack of clinically available steroid blood levels, and overall little attention to steroid exposure. Many feel that steroids were an essential part of chronic immunosuppression in past decades but may no longer be necessary in low-risk populations when our newer and more potent drugs are used. Potential differences in long-term outcome will be unapparent in short-term antibody induction studies in low-risk patients, particularly with low on steroid doses, as may have happened in the recent, well-done Astellas trial. In many studies, the evidence for the superiority of mycophenolate (MMF) and tacrolimus (TAC) was not as strong as the evidence for the benefit of steroids in the Canadian cyclosporine study. As the practice of steroid withdrawal has increased, we have not seen the improvement in long-term graft survival that many expected with our newer agents. Steroids have immunosuppressive effects even in doses that are low by historic standards, and side effects may not justify their abandonment.

Differential White Cell Count Relationships With Human Cardiac Allograft Rejection

The focus of research in allograft rejection has targeted the lymphocyte, with little attention given to the neutrophil. Recent data indicate that a perioperative neutrophil influx into the cardiac allograft influences early rejection. Factors that influence neutrophil transendothelial migration might offer predictive markers of rejection. We explored the relationship between the number of circulating neutrophils in heart transplant recipients and the development of rejection. Differential white cell counts were obtained prior to transplantation and concurrently with subsequent endomyocardial rejection surveillance biopsies for 53 heart transplant recipients undergoing 410 biopsies. Preoperative differential white cell counts had no relationship with rejection. In the first 3 months after transplantation, no relationship was found between contemporary differential white cell counts and rejection. However, more than 3 months following surgery, rejection grade positively correlated on univariate analysis with neutrophil counts and the usage of cyclosporine, prednisolone, and mycophenolate. There was no relationship with eosinophils or lymphocytes. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a persistent relationship among rejection severity, neutrophil count, and prednisolone usage. A significant positive association of higher steroid usage with higher rejection grades must reflect efforts to treat patients with rejection. The significant association of higher neutrophil counts with higher rejection severity might suggest a pathological contribution to rejection. However, given the neutrophilia response to acute steroid administration, we must conclude that the neutrophil association was related to steroid administration. The absence of a relationship between white cell counts and rejection suggests that functional rather than antiproliferative strategies may offer the greatest therapeutic potential.

Neointimal Inflammation and Adventitial Angiogenesis Correlate With Severity of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy in Pediatric Recipients

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammation and angiogenesis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of both cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and age-related vasculopathy. Because concurrent atherosclerosis does not complicate assessment of CAV in children, we sought to characterize the spectrum of coronary lesions in this population and determine whether inflammatory infiltrates and angiogenesis correlate with severity of CAV.

METHODS

In 18 pediatric heart specimens CAV was graded 1 to 4 (none to severe). Each case was assigned to either: Group I, no inflammation; Group II, perivascular inflammation; or Group III, perivascular and neointimal inflammation. Inflammatory infiltrates were immunophenotyped using anti-CD3, anti-CD20 and HAM 56. Angiogenesis was assessed by determining microvascular density (MVD) in 5 high-power fields (HPFs) per section.

RESULTS

CAV was evident in 94% of cases, and inflammation in 61%. Cases with neointimal inflammation had significantly more severe CAV compared with cases without inflammation (2.7 +/- 0.16 vs 1.9 +/- 0.2, p = 0.002). MVD was significantly higher in both inflammation groups (Groups II and III) compared with Group I (4.1 +/- 0.5 per HPF and 5.9 +/- 0.5 vs 3.1 +/- 0.7, p = 0.018 and p = 0.002) and correlated with the degree of CAV (p = 0.007). The perivascular infiltrates (Group II, n = 5) contained lymphocytes, macrophages and plasma cells, and 67% of neointimal infiltrates (Group III, n = 6) also contained eosinophils.

CONCLUSIONS

CAV in children is more common than previously reported. Our data indicate that CAV is often associated with inflammation and that adventitial angiogenesis correlated with the severity of CAV.

Immunosuppression, eotaxin and the diagnostic changes in eosinophils that precede early acute heart allograft rejection

Peripheral blood eosinophil counts (EOS) are undetectable in 40% blood samples sent for routine haematology at Papworth Hospital during the first 3 months after heart transplantation (HTx). Increases in EOS usually precede the development of allograft rejection by a median of 4 days. We compared the effects of cyclosporin (dose and total blood concentration), prednisolone (dose and both total and unbound plasma concentrations) and azathioprine, as well as plasma concentrations of the CCR-3 chemokines, eotaxin and RANTES, on changes in EOS in 47 consecutive HTx recipients, with a median follow-up of 90 (IQR 85-95) days. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association between both prednisolone dose (P<0.0001) and eotaxin (P<0.0001) and changes in EOS. The plasma eotaxin concentration was, in turn, most closely associated with the cyclosporin dose (P<0.001) and plasma prednisolone concentration (P=0.022). The blood cyclosporin concentration (P=0.028), EOS (P=0.012) and prednisolone dose (P=0.015) were all independently associated with the risk of treated acute rejection. When prednisolone pharmacokinetic parameters were substituted for the prednisolone dose in this multivariate model, only the pharmacokinetic parameter retained a significant association with the risk of rejection. Changes in EOS preceding cardiac allograft rejection are directly associated with plasma eotaxin concentrations and indirectly with prednisolone dosage. Cyclosporin may also indirectly influence these changes by inhibiting eotaxin production. EOS, prednisolone dose and blood cyclosporin concentrations were independently associated with the risk of acute rejection. The total and unbound fractions of prednisolone in plasma appear to be even more closely related to rejection but are difficult to measure. Monitoring EOS, as a surrogate measure of prednisolone immunosuppression, may be more cost-effective for controlling rejection than conventional cyclosporin monitoring in the first 6 weeks after HTx.

A role for eosinophils in transplant rejection

Eosinophils release inflammatory mediators and cationic proteins that are instrumental in the pathogenesis of allergic diseases such as bronchial asthma. Here, we review experimental observations indicating that eosinophils are also involved in the rejection of allografts. We propose that their role as effectors of transplant damage becomes crucial when classical pathways of rejection are inhibited and T helper 2 (Th2) cells dominate the alloimmune response.