Daily interferon therapy for hepatitis C virus infection in liver transplant recipients

Challenges of recurrent hepatitis C in the liver transplant patient

Cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a very common indication for liver transplant. Unfortunately recurrence of HCV is almost universal in patients who are viremic at the time of transplant. The progression of fibrosis has been shown to be more rapid in the post-transplant patients than in the transplant naïve, hence treatment of recurrent HCV needs to be considered for all patients with documented recurrent HCV. Management of recurrent HCV is a challenging situation both for patients and physicians due to multiple reasons as discussed in this review. The standard HCV treatment with pegylated interferon and Ribavarin can be considered in these patients but it leads to a lower rate of sustained virologic clearance than in the non-transplanted population. Some of the main challenges associated with treating recurrent HCV in post-transplant patients include the presence of cytopenias; need to monitor drug-drug interactions and the increased incidence of renal compromise. In spite of these obstacles all patients with recurrent HCV should be considered for treatment since it is associated with improvement in survival and a delay in fibrosis progression. With the arrival of direct acting antiviral drugs there is renewed hope for better outcomes in the treatment of post-transplant HCV recurrence. This review evaluates current literature on this topic and identifies challenges associated with the management of post-transplant HCV recurrence.

Antiviral interventions for liver transplant patients with recurrent graft infection due to hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial due to unresolved balance between benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic benefits and harms of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 1, 2013), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded to February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis. In the presence of only trials for a dichotomous outcome, we performed the Fisher's exact test.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, 17 trials with 736 patients met the inclusion criteria for this review. All trials had high risk of bias. Five hundred and one patients randomised in 11 trials provided information for various comparisons in this systematic review after excluding post-randomisation drop-outs and patients from trials that did not report any of the outcomes of interest for this review. The comparisons for which outcomes were available included pegylated (peg) interferon versus control; peg interferon plus ribavirin versus control; ribavirin plus peg interferon versus peg interferon; peg interferon (1.5 μg/kg/week) plus ribavirin versus peg interferon (0.5 μg/kg/week) plus ribavirin; amantadine plus peg interferon plus ribavirin versus peg interferon plus ribavirin; interferon versus control; interferon plus ribavirin versus control; ribavirin versus interferon; and ribavirin versus placebo. Long-term follow-up was not available in these trials. There were no significant differences in mortality, retransplantation, graft rejections requiring retransplantation or medical treatment, or fibrosis worsening between the groups in any of the comparisons in which these outcomes were reported. Quality of life and liver decompensation were not reported in any of the trials. There was a significantly higher proportion of participants who developed serious adverse events in the ribavirin plus peg interferon combination therapy group than in the peg interferon monotherapy group (1 trial; 56 participants; 17/28 (60.7%) in the intervention group versus 5/28 (17.9%) in the control group; RR 3.40; 95% CI 1.46 to 7.94). There was no significant difference in proportion of participants who developed serious adverse events or in the number of serious adverse events between the intervention and control groups in the other comparisons that reported serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Considering the lack of clinical benefit, there is currently no evidence to recommend or refute antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus. Further randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and low risk of random errors with adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Long-term leukocyte natural α-interferon and ribavirin treatment in hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the effect of long-term treatment with leukocyte natural α-interferon (ln-α-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV).

METHODS: Forty-six patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence received 3 MU three times a week of ln-α-IFN plus RBV for 1 mo; then, patients with good tolerability (n = 30) were switched to daily IFN administration, while the remaining were treated with the same schedule. Patients have been treated for 12 mo after viral clearance while non-responders (NR) entered in the long-term treatment group. Liver biopsies were planned at baseline, 1 year after sustained virological response (SVR) and at 36 mo after start of therapy in NR. MedCalc software package was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS: About 16.7% of genotype 1-4 and 70% of genotype 2-3 patients achieved SVR. Nine patients withdrew therapy because of non-tolerance or non-compliance. A significant improvement in serum biochemistry and histological activity was observed in all SVR patients and long-term treated; 100% of patients with SVR achieved a histological response (fibrosis stabilization or improvement) with a significant reduction in mean staging value (from 2.1 to 1.0; P = 0.0031); histological response was observed in 84% of long-term treated patients compared to 57% of drop-out. Six patients died during the entire study period (follow-up 40.6 ± 7.7 mo); of them, 5 presented with severe HCV recurrence on enrollment. Diabetes (OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.08-0.59, P = 0.01), leukopenia (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.03-0.57, P = 0.03) and severe HCV recurrence (OR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.25-0.69, P = 0.0003) were variables associated to survival. Long-term treatment was well tolerated; no patients developed rejection or autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment improves histology in SVR patients and slows disease progression also in NR, leading to a reduction in liver decompensation, graft failure and liver-related death.

Systematic review: anti-viral therapy of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the first cause of liver transplantation worldwide. Recurrence of infection is constant, and compromises patient and graft survival.

AIM

To provide an updated review of the main treatments of recurrent HCV.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1990 to August 2010) and national meeting abstract search. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment, sustained virological response. An emphasis was placed on randomised trials.

RESULTS

Anti-viral therapy based on pegylated interferon and ribavirin must be considered before liver transplantation, but is poorly tolerated and has poor results in patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma. Anti-viral therapy can be administrated systematically early after liver transplantation, or in patients with established recurrent chronic hepatitis. Combination of pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin results in a sustained virological response of up to 30% in patients with histological HCV recurrence. The results of a small trial of polyclonal anti-HCV to prevent recurrence were disappointing.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available anti-viral therapy is effective only in a minority of transplanted patients infected with HCV. Specifically targeted anti-viral therapies combining interferon alpha and ribavirin, or a combination of antiprotease and antipolymerase components, associated with a genetic prediction of anti-viral response and blocking HCV cell entry should improve the long-term prognosis of recurrent hepatitis C in the near future.

Treatment options for hepatitis C and the rationale for low response rates in African Americans

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), the leading cause for liver transplantation, is emerging as1 of the infections that pose public health problems in the world since about 170 million people worldwide are infected with this virus. Inequality in addressing racial/ethnic disparities in treatment for hepatitis C is a pressing problem. HCV is more common among African Americans than among other racial groups in the United States. Although African Americans have been shown to have a lower rate of viral clearance and a higher rate of chronic hepatitis C, they may have at the same time a much lower rate of fibrosis progression compared to Caucasians. The purpose of this study is to summarize treatment options available for hepatitis C in African Americans and to describe the different mechanisms thought to be the reasons for the disparate response to treatment in African Americans.

Antiviral therapy for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy to treat recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial due to unresolved balance between benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic benefits and harms of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis. In the presence of only trial for a dichotomous outcome, we performed the Fisher's exact test.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 425 liver transplant recipients with proven hepatitis C recurrence were randomised in twelve trials to various interventions and controls. The mean proportion of genotype I was 79.9% in the nine trials that reported the genotype. All the trials were of high risk of bias. One to two trials were included under each comparison including single drug or multidrug regimens of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine. There was no significant difference in the mortality, graft rejection, or in re-transplantation between intervention and control in any of the comparisons that reported these outcomes. None of the trials reported liver decompensation or quality of life. Life-threatening adverse effects were not reported in either group in any of the comparisons. Up to 87.5% of patients required reduction in dose and up to 42.9% of patients required cessation of treatment in the various comparisons because of adverse effects or because of patient's choice to stop treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Considering the lack of clinical benefit and the frequent adverse effects, there is currently no evidence to recommend antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with HCV. Further randomised clinical trials with adequate trial methodology and adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Antiviral therapy for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy to treat recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic efficacy and side effects of different antiviral regimens in patients with hepatitis C re-infected grafts after liver transplantation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until September 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) comparing various antiviral therapies (alone or in combination) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence in liver transplantation were considered for the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors collected the data independently. We calculated the relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the fixed-effect and the random-effects models based on available case-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 389 liver transplant recipients with proven hepatitis C recurrence were randomised in eleven trials to various interventions and controls. The mean proportion of genotype I was 77.8% in the seven trials that reported the genotype. Only one or two trials were included under each comparison. All the trials were of high risk of bias. There was no difference in the mortality, graft rejection, or in re-transplantation between intervention and control in any of the comparisons that reported these outcomes. None of the trials reported liver decompensation or quality of life. Life-threatening adverse effects were not reported in either group in any of the comparisons. Up to 87.5% of patients required reduction in dose and up to 42.9% of patients required cessation of treatment in the various comparisons because of adverse effects or because of patient's choice to stop treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

1. Considering the lack of clinical benefit and the frequent adverse effects, there is currently no evidence to recommend antiviral treatment for recurrent liver graft infection with HCV. 2. Further randomised clinical trials with adequate trial methodology and adequate duration of follow-up are necessary.

Chronic ductopenic rejection in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Interferon use for post liver transplantation (LT) recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) has not consistently been associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR). We examined the incidence of chronic ductopenic rejection (CR) in patients receiving pegylated interferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (PEG) to treat recurrent HCV.

METHODS

A chart review of 12 patients developing CR while receiving an escalating dose regimen of PEG with protocol liver biopsies every 6 months was conducted. Values are shown as median (range).

RESULTS

Twelve of the 70 patients treated with PEG developed CR. Median age at LT was 53 (37-63) years; immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus or cyclosporine with prednisone. PEG was started at 3.6 (0.2-13.5) years after LT. Two patients had one episode of ACR before PEG. Four patients had first ACR while receiving PEG. CR was diagnosed after 12 (4-17) months of PEG; by then 8 patients had undetectable HCV-RNA. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine levels (ng/mL) were 7.9 (3.2-18.9) and 76 (71-93) before PEG, and 6.9 (3.7-9.7) and 130 (81-153) at CR. Six patients were treated more than 1 year with PEG; three had undetectable HCV-RNA when CR was diagnosed. Five patients are being treated for CR; one has been listed for LT; two patients were retransplanted. Five patients died as a result of sepsis partially related to CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with pegylated-interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin may trigger rapidly progressive CR in patients with therapeutic immunosuppressive trough levels, with or without first inducing ACR.

Review article: the treatment of hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Recurrent hepatitis C represents a major challenge for the liver transplant community. Given the potentially significant impact that hepatitis C recurrence has on graft and patient survival, several treatment strategies have been utilized to prevent/slow the progression to hepatitis C-related graft failure.

AIM

To review the efficacy and applicability of treatment strategies for managing recurrent hepatitis C.

METHODS

Search of MEDLINE (1990 to December 2006) and national meeting abstracts. Search terms included hepatitis C, liver transplantation, treatment, sustained virological response (SVR), and end of treatment virological response. An emphasis was placed on randomized trials.

RESULTS

The largest study of treatment prior to liver transplantation (n = 124) achieved SVR in 24%. Eight randomized trials (n = 383) examined the efficacy of preemptive therapy with SVR ranging from 0-33%. Eligibility for treatment was low and dose reduction common. Four randomized trials (n = 245; all abstracts) have reported SVR from 33-42% for treating those with histological evidence of recurrent disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapies for treating hepatitis C recurrence have limited applicability and tolerability, and they have a low SVR. Based on available results, preemptive therapy is not recommended. Pegylated interferon and ribavirin is currently the preferred choice for treating established recurrence. There is an urgent need for safer and more effective anti-viral therapy in this situation.

Hepatitis C virus re-infection: new perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the liver graft has been recognized to be one of the most important factors that determines prognosis and outcome after liver transplantation in HCV-positive patients. Graft loss due to recurrent HCV re-cirrhosis and subsequent hepatic decompensation, which is the predominant cause of death among transplant recipients, reflects the prognostic significance of HCV re-infection. Despite better overall outcome after liver transplantation, the prognosis of HCV-infected patients has not improved during the last two decades. Recent data suggest that increased liver donor age and intensified immunosuppression of transplant patients are the most important contributors to this situation. Other prognostic factors need further confirmation to stratify risk constellations. As HCV cirrhosis has also become the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation, the therapeutic management of HCV re-infection is a central issue of liver transplantation. The antiviral approaches based on interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin combinations are still hampered by high toxicity and low efficacy. Sustained viral response rates are still as low as approximately 10-30% and further prospective clinical trials are mandatory to identify the best time point and schedule of antiviral treatment in transplant patients.

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading cause of endstage liver disease in Western and Asian countries. However, after liver transplantation, HCV recurs in virtually all patients, and estimated HCV-related graft cirrhosis at 5-year follow-up is 30%. Although immunosuppression accounts for a major part of the accelerated progression of HCV in the transplant population, the best immunosuppression for recipients with HCV that could avoid such complication remains unknown at present. Combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin is thought to be the most effective for the treatment or prophylaxis of HCV infection. However, who should be treated, when treatment should be initiated, and with what agent should patients with HCV infection be treated are still unknown. The current data on HCV recurrence in patients who have received either living- or deceased-donor liver transplantation are controversial, but they are, presumably, similar. Thus, to avoid HCV recurrence in living-donor liver transplantation, we have to take approaches similar to those used for patients receiving deceased-donor liver transplantation. Based on reports from major transplant centers around the world, we consider the best strategy for liver transplantation-related HCV infection is steroid-free immunosuppression and preemptive low-dose interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. Here we describe our experience with living-donor liver transplantion for patients with hepatitis C at Osaka University. There is a need for standardizing the treatment for HCV infection. This can only be achieved through collaborative work between various liver transplant centers worldwide.

HCV clearance and treatment outcome in genotype 1 HCV-monoinfected, HIV-coinfected and liver transplanted patients on peg-IFN-alpha-2b/ribavirin

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Differences in HCV-RNA clearance during therapy might explain the lower efficacy of peg-IFN/RBV in HIV/HCV-coinfection. There are limited data on HCV-RNA clearance and treatment outcomes in liver transplanted (LT) patients.

METHODS

To assess the rates of SVR and baseline predictors of failure after 48 weeks of weight-adjusted peg-IFN-alpha-2b/RBV in 120 patients with HCV genotype 1: 61 HCV-monoinfected, 40 HIV-coinfected and 19 LT-patients. Viral clearance was evaluated in patients completing 24 weeks of therapy (n=112, 93%).

RESULTS

SVR was significantly lower in HIV-coinfection than in HCV-monoinfection or LT (18 vs. 39 vs. 42%, P<0.02). By multivariate analysis, HIV-coinfection (OR 3.048, 95% CI 1.133-8.196; P=0.027), baseline HCV-RNA over 800,000 IU/ml (OR 2.800; 95% CI 1.121-6.993, P=0.027) and higher AST values (OR 1.009; 95% CI 1.001-1.018; P=0.028) were significantly associated to failure. Despite similar baseline HCV load (5.67 vs. 5.75 vs. 5.90 log10 IU/ml), HIV-coinfection showed significantly lower HCV-RNA decreases than HCV-monoinfection at weeks 4 (P=0.015), 12 (P=0.015) and 24 (P=0.0003), and than LT at weeks 12 (P=0.003) and 24 (P=0.023). 36/60 subjects (60%) reaching EVR by week 12 obtained SVR vs. 3/60 (5%) who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-coinfection was independently associated to treatment failure, and led to a significantly slower HCV-RNA clearance.

Quality of life, depression and fatigue among persons co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C: outcomes from a population-based cohort

The objective of the study was to describe the additional burden generated by hepatitis C (HCV) infection among HIV-infected individuals as measured by self-reported quality of life, depression and fatigue. The provincial HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Program (DTP) distributes all antiretroviral medication in the province of British Columbia. Eligibility for accessing antiretrovirals is based on published guidelines commensurate with the International AIDS Society. Each participant is asked to complete a self-administered mailed questionnaire that includes patient sociodemographic information, quality of life measures (Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form (MOS-SF), mental health issues (Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD) and fatigue information. HIV-HCV co-infected individuals were compared to HIV mono-infected individuals using parametric and nonparametric methods. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the impact of hepatitis C on quality of life, depression and fatigue, after controlling for sociodemographics and HIV-specific clinical characteristics. Of the 4,134 individuals who were sent a HIV/AIDS DTP survey in 1999, 2000 or 2001, 484 participants both returned one and had an HCV-antibody test result on file. Of the 484 participants eligible for this analysis, 105 (22%) were HCV-positive. In comparison to the 379 (78%) patients testing negative for HCV, a larger proportion of co-infected patients were female (18% versus 3%, p<0.001), aboriginal (20% versus 3%, p<0.001), had ever injected drugs (79% versus 5%, p<0.001), were unemployed (91% versus 49%, p<0.001) and lived in unstable housing (19% versus 1%, p<0.001) at the time they completed the survey. Co-infected patients reported more symptoms consistent with depression, increased fatigue and poorer quality of life. However, using multivariate modeling, it was determined that the impact of HCV on quality of life, depression and fatigue was better explained by the sociodemographic factors related to poverty and injection drug use, than by HCV itself. In conclusion, individuals co-infected with HIV and HCV represent a patient population with significant physical and mental health challenges. Although these patients experience poorer quality of life, increased depression and fatigue, this experience appears to be primarily related to socio-economic issues rather than HCV infection.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in the setting of liver transplantation

1. Posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection is a universal phenomenon with a highly variable natural history. 2. Approximately 10% to 25% of hepatitis C virus- infected recipients of liver allografts will develop cirrhosis within 5 years' after transplantation. 3. The 1-year actuarial risk of hepatic decompensation after recurrence of cirrhosis approximates 42%. 4. Some of the factors associated with aggressive recurrence include donor and recipient age, recent year of transplantation, recipient gender and race, the use of antithymocyte globulin, and high dose of corticosteroids. 5. Highly aggressive recurrent hepatitis C virus infection leading to cirrhosis fares poorly after retransplantation in the presence of hyperbilirubinemia and renal failure, with a 1-year survival of approximately 40%. 6. Elevated serum aminotransferases are a poor indicator or recurrent disease. 7. Current sustained virological response after combination pegylated alpha interferon and ribavirin treatment is approximately 25%. 8. There is no consensus on initiation time point, duration of treatment, or dosage. Given immunosuppression, at least 48 weeks of therapy is a reasonable approach. 9. Treatment for 48 weeks is cost effective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for men aged 55 years is $29,100 per life-year saved.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C virus: systematic review of antiviral therapy

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is increasingly used. This systematic review presents both viral and histological response in three areas: pretransplant (5 studies/180 patients), preemptive therapy soon after transplant (10 studies/417 patients), and therapy for established disease (75 studies/2027 patients). There were only 16 randomized studies (543 patients). Significant dose reductions and drug stoppage rates occurred. The data on histological improvement and risk of rejection are conflicting. Even the best antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon/ribavirin) is neither easily used nor reasonably effective. The best strategy will be pretransplant treatment, most likely with newer agents.

Treatment of hepatitis B and C after liver transplantation. Part 2, hepatitis C

End-stage liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus is a major indication for liver transplantation. However, recurrence of hepatitis in the graft is a major issue. HCV re-infection after transplantation is almost constant, and recent data confirm that it significantly impairs patient and graft survival. Factors that may influence disease severity and consequent progression of HCV graft injury remain unclear. Chronic HCV infection develops in 60%-80% of patients, and 6%-28% ultimately progress to cirrhosis within 5 years. Pre-transplantation antiviral treatment is not easily related to poor tolerance. Attempts to administer prophylactic post-transplantation antiviral treatment are under evaluation but are limited by antiviral drug side effects. Treatment of established graft lesions with interferon or ribavirin as single agents has been disappointing. Combination therapy gave promising results, with sustained virological response in 25% of patients, but indications, modality and duration of treatment should be assessed.

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.

Management of hepatitis C after transplantation: a long way from success

Recurrence of hepatitis C after transplantation is expected. Unfortunately, the outcome is poor in some, with as many as 25% of patients developing decompensated cirrhosis. Thus, developing treatment strategies to eradicate infection or slow the progression of hepatic fibrosis is crucial. The published data on treatment in this population is limited with viral response rates reported anywhere from 0-48%. Furthermore, the poor tolerability of therapy is highlighted in the Berenguer article. These data emphasize the importance of developing effective non-interferon based therapies for the post-transplant patient.

Natural history of hepatitis C following liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, chronic hepatitis C virus-infection-related cirrhosis is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the USA and most parts of the world. While the incidence of new hepatitis C virus cases has decreased, the prevalence of infection will not peak until the year 2040. In addition, as the duration of infection increases, the proportion of new patients with cirrhosis will double by 2020 in an untreated patient population. If this model is correct, the projected increase in the need for liver transplantation secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus infection will place an impossible burden on an already limited supply of organs. In this article we present a comprehensive review of post-transplant hepatitis C virus infection and address the major challenges that face the transplant community.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hepatitis C virus infection recurs virtually in every post-transplant patient. Typically, serum levels of hepatitis C virus RNA increase rapidly from week 2 post-liver transplant, achieving 1-year post-liver transplant levels that are 10-20-fold greater than the mean pre-liver transplant levels. Progression of chronic hepatitis C virus is more aggressive after liver transplantation with a cumulative probability of developing graft cirrhosis estimated to reach 30% at 5 years. Approximately 10% of the patients with recurrent disease will die or require re-transplantation within 5 years post-transplantation. Interventions to prevent, improve, or halt the recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection have been evaluated by multiple small studies worldwide with similar overall rates of virological clearance of approximately 9-30%. Current consensus recommends combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for those patients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C virus infection and fibrosis of >/= 2/4. Therapy is adjusted to tolerance and rescued with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin for bone marrow suppression.

SUMMARY

The major challenges that face the transplant community in the coming years include new strategies to meet the growing demand for limited organ donor supplies and improvement of treatment for those patients in whom recurrence of viral disease has occurred. Only with improved antiviral treatments and strategies will we make a significant impact on this problem.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in the liver transplant recipient

Significant necroinflammatory and/or fibrotic histologic changes should prompt consideration of antiviral therapy in liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Depending on the patient, consideration of lower-dose pegylated interferon initially, with an increase to standard doses over the course of 1 month, may improve patient compliance and tolerance. The use of growth factors to prevent anemia and leukopenia is encouraged. Liver transplant recipients should be treated for at least 1 year, until data are available on optimal duration of therapy in non-genotype 1 patients in this patient subpopulation.

The clinical and immunologic impact of using interferon and ribavirin in the immunosuppressed host

1. Allograft infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in immunosuppressed adults results in decreased allograft and patient survival. 2. Risk factors for accelerated progression of hepatitis C related to immunosuppression include treated episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR), pulse therapy with methylprednisolone, and use of OKT3. 3. Both interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin (RVN) show antiviral actions against HCV and stimulate innate and adaptive immunity to increase cytolysis and polarize T helper subtype 1 (T(H)1) responses. In addition, IFN-alpha inhibits fibrogenesis in the liver. 4. Both IFN-alpha and RVN have been studied in immunosuppressed liver transplant recipients as prophylaxis or treatment of established hepatitis C to reduce allograft failure and patient mortality. Reported protocols include monotherapies with RVN, standard IFN-alpha, and pegylated IFN-alpha and combination therapies using RVN and either standard IFN-alpha or pegylated IFN-alpha. 5. The clinical impact of using IFN-alpha and RVN in highly selected immunosuppressed patients varied among studies. Combination therapy with standard IFN-alpha and RVN resulted in the greatest sustained biochemical and virological responses. However, no therapy prevented progression of acute cholestatic hepatitis C despite evidence of virological responses. Substantial proportions of patients developed adverse events requiring dose reduction or discontinuation that compromised efficacy. RVN monotherapy was not only virologically ineffective, but may have stimulated hepatic fibrosis. Current data regarding monotherapy or combination therapy with pegylated IFN-alpha are limited, but encouraging. 6. Despite potent immunostimulatory actions of both IFN-alpha and RVN that enhance natural killer, T(H)1, their use did not significantly increase the incidence of ACR. 7. Additional studies are needed to resolve the controversy over prophylaxis versus treatment of established disease and the potential utility of low-dose maintenance IFN-alpha therapy to retard fibrogenesis without clearing HCV. 8. After new, less toxic, and more potent antiviral agents become available, they should be tested immediately in patients with hepatitis C post-liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplant: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic options

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Updated data suggest worse long-term outcomes for those transplanted with HCV than those transplanted for other indications. Re-infection with HCV post-OLT is universal, therefore diagnosis of recurrence should be based on histological findings in the setting of persistent viremia. Variables associated with worse outcome of recurrent disease include early recurrence, degree of immunosuppression, and donor age. Antiviral therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease, and can be initiated prior to transplantation, prophylactically after transplantation, and during recurrence. Preliminary studies of pre-transplantation treatment demonstrate virological responses, but tolerance is common. Higher efficacy has been associated with combination therapy for recurrent disease. Adverse effects limit its widespread use.

Synergistic antiviral activity of human interferon combinations in the hepatitis C virus replicon system

The use of type I interferon (IFN), in combination with ribvirin, to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has many drawbacks that prevent widespread application, ultimately leading to a significant unmet clinical need. Potential improvements in IFN therapy through targeted delivery, molecular alteration, and combination with other agents are ongoing in an attempt to decrease adverse effects and increase efficacy. In this report, the HCV replicon cell culture system was used to assess potential synergistic antiviral effects of multiple IFN species when administered in combination. Quantitative analysis of HCV replicon RNA by TaqMan (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and qualitative analysis of HCV protein expression were used to measure the antiviral efficacy of individual and combination IFN treatments, and synergistic responses of IFN combinations were determined through statistical analysis of the TaqMan results. We found that when administered simultaneously, type I/II IFN combinations (IFN-alpha2b + IFN-gamma or IFN-beta + IFN-gamma) resulted in dramatic antiviral synergy, whereas a type I/I combination (IFN-alpha2b + IFN-beta) demonstrated a slightly antagonistic profile. The synergistic effect is likely due to differential cell surface receptors and signaling pathways employed by types I and II IFNs. Conversely, all type I IFN species bind the same receptor and signal through similar pathways, possibly accounting for the nearly additive response observed. In support of this hypothesis, IFN treatment resulted in differential induction of Stat1 phosphorylation at Tyr 701. In conclusion, simultaneous type I/II IFN combination treatment may allow an overall decreased effective IFN dose, which may reduce the side effect profiles that hinder current therapy.

Histopathological study of chronic hepatitis B and C: a comparison of two scoring systems

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several histological scoring systems are used to evaluate chronic viral hepatitis. This study was undertaken to determine the correlation between the Ishak system (modified histological activity index, HAI) and the METAVIR system, in Indian patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

METHODS

Liver biopsies from 127 patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C were examined, and scored using the Ishak and METAVIR systems, and weighted kappa analysis of correlation was done. Correlation of necroinflammatory activity with serum transaminase levels was analyzed, and prevalence of specific histological features compared in hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV biopsies.

RESULTS

HBV infection accounted for 64.6% of cases, and HCV for 35.4%; 91.3% of patients had minimal or mild hepatitis. The necroinflammatory scores of the Ishak and METAVIR systems correlated moderately well (weighted kappa 0.627), while there was excellent correlation with regard to fibrosis (weighted kappa 0.998). Similar concordance was found when HBV and HCV cases were analyzed separately. HAI showed poor correlation with serum transaminases (weighted kappa 0.21). Micronodular cirrhosis, lymphoid aggregates, bile duct damage, bile ductular proliferation and steatosis were significantly more common in HCV biopsies compared to HBV.

CONCLUSIONS

Concordance between Ishak and METAVIR scoring systems is good for necroinflammatory change, and excellent for fibrotic change.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C

1. Treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with interferon-alpha monotherapy does not achieve sustained virologic response (SVR). 2. Treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with combination interferon plus ribavirin achieves SVR rates of 17% to 27%, but dropout rates approach 30%. 3. Pretransplant prophylaxis against recurrent hepatitis C with combination interferon plus ribavirin is poorly tolerated in patients with decompensated hepatitis C cirrhosis. 4. Posttransplant prophylaxis with combination interferon plus ribavirin prevents both recurrent viremia and hepatitis in 15% to 20% of patients, but dropout rates approach 50%. 5. Hepatitis C virus genotype is the best predictor of response to antiviral prophylaxis and treatment of recurrent hepatitis C. 6. Interferon-alpha therapy is not associated with an increased risk of allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients. 7. Ribavirin therapy is associated with increased hemolysis in liver transplant recipients. 8. Preliminary data suggest pegylated interferon monotherapy will have similar efficacy but better tolerability than combination interferon plus ribavirin. 9. In a recent study, posttransplant immunoprophylaxis with polyclonal hepatitis C immunoglobulin had no effect on recurrent viremia or hepatitis.

HCV chronic hepatitis in patients with HIV: clinical management issues

HIV-hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is common and affects more than one-third of all HIV infected persons worldwide. Prevalence among risk categories varies according to shared risk factors for transmission, mainly intravenous drug use (IDU) and hemophiliacs. Chronic HCV infection seems to accelerate the course of HIV disease, resulting in a worsened clinical and immunological progression. At the same time, several studies suggest that HIV disease modifies the natural history of HCV infection, leading to a faster course of progression from active hepatitis to cirrhosis, to end stage liver disease and death. HCV infection mimics opportunistic diseases because its natural history is significantly accelerated in HIV patients. Since highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has slowed the progression of HIV disease and decreased the rate of HIV associated mortality, the prognosis of HIV disease has been modified, and the need to treat HCV coinfection become a significant issue. Because of the poor response rate obtained by either interferon alone or interferon thrice weekly plus ribavirin, the combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin will probably become the standard of care, although the clinicians should be aware of the overlapping toxicity of nucleoside analogues and ribavirin. Many selected categories of patients pose particular challenges to physicians treating HCV infection: nonresponders to interferon, cirrhotic patients, and patients infected with both HCV and HBV. Liver transplantation in HIV patients is currently under evaluation, but should become the rescue therapy for HIV patients with end stage liver disease.

Update on the Management of Hepatitis C in Liver Transplant Recipients

Hepatic failure due to hepatitis C is the leading indicator for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in the United States. Unfortunately, recurrent hepatitis C virus infection is essentially universal following orthotopic liver transplantation. Although significant advances have been made in the past decade for the treatment of hepatitis C, a similar level of success has not yet been achieved for most hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients. In addition, deleterious side effects of the currently available antiviral agents continue to significantly hamper their use. Several recent reports, however, indicate that newer immunosuppressive regimens combined with novel modifications of existing treatment paradigms will likely lead to improved clinical outcomes for the hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipient.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus and HIV co-infections

Hepatitis C coinfection is common in patients with HIV, particularly in injection-drug users. Hepatitis C virus levels tend to be higher in coinfected patients, and histologic progression is more rapid than in patients with HCV alone. The efficacy of interferon monotherapy in HIV patients with an adequate CD4 cell count is comparable to that observed in patients without HIV. The combination of interferon plus ribavirin and pegylated interferon will further improve response rates. Interferon therapy is associated with leukopenia and a decrease in absolute CD4 cell count. Some concern remains that ribavirin might reduce the activity of pyrimidine analogues such as zidovudine and stavudine, and HIV-RNA levels should be followed when these medications are given concurrently. It is hoped that in time, new drug development will make the multiple-drug therapeutic strategy that has been highly successful in the management of HIV feasible for the treatment of HCV.

Perioperative management of liver transplantation patients

Perioperative care involves many disciplines, each of which contributes in important ways. Changes in liver-transplantation care during the last 40 years can be attributed to the accumulation of improvements, discoveries, and technologic improvements across different disciplines. Here we review some of the articles that were published during the last year that relate to these advances.