Antigen expression in xenotransplantation: how low must it go?

Accommodation in allogeneic and xenogeneic organ transplantation: Prevalence, impact, and implications for monitoring and for therapeutics

Accommodation refers to acquired resistance of organs or tissues to immune or inflammatory reactions that might otherwise cause severe injury or rejection. As first observed in ABO-incompatible kidney transplants and heterotopic cardiac xenografts, accommodation was identified when organ transplants continued to function despite the presence of anti-graft antibodies and/or other reactants in the blood of recipients. Recent evidence suggests many and perhaps most organ transplants have accommodation, as most recipients mount B cell responses specific for the graft. Wide interest in the impact of graft-specific antibodies on the outcomes of transplants prompts questions about which mechanisms confer protection against such antibodies, how accommodation might be detected and whether and how rejection could be superimposed on accommodation. Xenotransplantation offers a unique opportunity to address these questions because immune responses to xenografts are easily detected and the pathogenic impact of immune responses is so severe. Xenotransplantation also provides a compelling need to apply these and other insights to decrease the intensity and toxicity of immunosuppression that otherwise could limit clinical application.

Xenotransplantation: Progress Along Paths Uncertain from Models to Application

For more than a century, transplantation of tissues and organs from animals into man, xenotransplantation, has been viewed as a potential way to treat disease. Ironically, interest in xenotransplantation was fueled especially by successful application of allotransplantation, that is, transplantation of human tissue and organs, as a treatment for a variety of diseases, especially organ failure because scarcity of human tissues limited allotransplantation to a fraction of those who could benefit. In principle, use of animals such as pigs as a source of transplants would allow transplantation to exert a vastly greater impact than allotransplantation on medicine and public health. However, biological barriers to xenotransplantation, including immunity of the recipient, incompatibility of biological systems, and transmission of novel infectious agents, are believed to exceed the barriers to allotransplantation and presently to hinder clinical applications. One way potentially to address the barriers to xenotransplantation is by genetic engineering animal sources. The last 2 decades have brought progressive advances in approaches that can be applied to genetic modification of large animals. Application of these approaches to genetic engineering of pigs has contributed to dramatic improvement in the outcome of experimental xenografts in nonhuman primates and have encouraged the development of a new type of xenograft, a reverse xenograft, in which human stem cells are introduced into pigs under conditions that support differentiation and expansion into functional tissues and potentially organs. These advances make it appropriate to consider the potential limitation of genetic engineering and of current models for advancing the clinical applications of xenotransplantation and reverse xenotransplantation.

Accommodation in ABO-incompatible organ transplants

Accommodation refers to a condition in which a transplant (or any tissue) appears to resist immune-mediated injury and loss of function. Accommodation was discovered and has been explored most thoroughly in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. In this setting, kidney transplants bearing blood group A or B antigens often are found to function normally in recipients who lack and hence produce antibodies directed against the corresponding antigens. Whether accommodation is owed to changes in anti-blood group antibodies, changes in antigen or a change in the response of the transplant to antibody binding are critically reviewed and a new working model that allows for the kinetics of development of accommodation is put forth. Regardless of how accommodation develops, observations on the fate of ABO-incompatible transplants offer lessons applicable more broadly in transplantation and in other fields.

Using individual DSA titers to assess for accommodation after late humoral rejection

Management of late humoral rejection remains challenging, and DSA may persist. A case report illustrates how individual DSA titers using solid-phase-based assays may help to assess for accommodation. A male cystinosis patient received a cadaveric renal transplant at the age of 12 yr with a daclizumab, tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids-based immunosuppression. After three acute rejection episodes over the first eight months, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was diagnosed on biopsy, while the immunosuppression was left unchanged with a high target exposure for both tacrolimus and MPA. One yr later, AMR type III (C4d and DSA positive) was treated with daily plasmapheresis, IVIG 100 mg/kg and pulse steroids 5 mg/kg. DSA (DR 53, DQ4, and DQ 2) were not responding until the plasma volume was increased to 2.5 plasma volumes. A second rise of creatinine confirmed worse humoral rejection; daily plasma exchange was resumed, and two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) were given. Subsequently, all DSA dropped, but only DR53 DSA remained unchanged, whereas the DQ antibodies rebounded to very strong titers. With a follow-up of over 120 days after recovery of the CD19 count, off all additional treatment and on identical immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF and prednisone, the patient's creatinine remained stable between 45 and 50 um while DQ DSA remain strong to very strong. We conclude that the patient is in a state of accommodation. DSA titers should be monitored when managing late humoral rejection.

Report from a consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The problem of AMR remains unsolved because standardized schemes for diagnosis and treatment remains contentious. Therefore, a consensus conference was organized to discuss the current status of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplantation.

METHODS

The conference included 83 participants (transplant cardiologists, surgeons, immunologists and pathologists) representing 67 heart transplant centers from North America, Europe, and Asia who all participated in smaller break-out sessions to discuss the various topics of AMR and attempt to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

A tentative pathology diagnosis of AMR was established, however, the pathologist felt that further discussion was needed prior to a formal recommendation for AMR diagnosis. One of the most important outcomes of this conference was that a clinical definition for AMR (cardiac dysfunction and/or circulating donor-specific antibody) was no longer believed to be required due to recent publications demonstrating that asymptomatic (no cardiac dysfunction) biopsy-proven AMR is associated with subsequent greater mortality and greater development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. It was also noted that donor-specific antibody is not always detected during AMR episodes as the antibody may be adhered to the donor heart. Finally, recommendations were made for the timing for specific staining of endomyocardial biopsy specimens and the frequency by which circulating antibodies should be assessed. Recommendations for management and future clinical trials were also provided.

CONCLUSIONS

The AMR Consensus Conference brought together clinicians, pathologists and immunologists to further the understanding of AMR. Progress was made toward a pathology AMR grading scale and consensus was accomplished regarding several clinical issues.

Accommodation in renal transplantation: unanswered questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Accommodation, an acquired resistance of an organ to immune-mediated damage, has been recognized as an outcome of renal transplantation for more than 20 years. Accommodation was originally identified in blood group-incompatible kidney transplants that survived and functioned normally in recipients with high titers of antiblood group antibodies directed against antigens in the grafts. The most compelling questions today include how often and by which mechanisms accommodation occurs, and what might be the biological implications of accommodation. This communication summarizes recent advances in addressing these questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Because its diagnosis has depended on identification of antidonor antibodies in serum, the prevalence of accommodation has been considered low. Recent research in animal models and clinical subjects may challenge that view. This research also suggests that sublethal graft injury of various types induces accommodation and that accommodation may be a dynamic condition, eventuating into tolerance on the one hand and chronic graft injury on the other.

SUMMARY

Burgeoning lines of investigation into accommodation now portray a condition of greater prevalence than once thought, exposing pathways that may contribute to the understanding of a range of responses to transplantation.

The role of antibodies in transplantation

For the past 40 years, T cells have been considered the primary threat to the survival of allografts. However, antibodies can induce severe vascular disease of organ transplants, and this disease, particularly "antibody-mediated" rejection, has become a major clinical challenge. Not only do antibodies cause rejection, the rejection caused by antibodies resists treatment by conventional drug regimens. On the other hand, antibodies can induce a condition in which grafts seemingly resist antibody-mediated injury, which is accommodation. In this communication, we discuss the role of antibodies in the diagnosis and pathogenesis of rejection and accommodation, and suggest what we considered the major gaps in knowledge and directions research into this subject might productively take.

Accommodation in organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review recent insights into the mechanisms and prevalence of accommodation. Accommodation refers to an acquired resistance of an organ graft to humoral injury and rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accommodation has been postulated to reflect changes in antibodies, control of complement and/or acquired resistance to injury by antibodies, complement or other factors. We discuss the importance of these mechanisms, highlighting new conclusions.

SUMMARY

Accommodation may be a common, perhaps the most common, outcome of organ transplantation and, in some systems, a predictable outcome of organ xenotransplantation. Further understanding of how accommodation is induced and by what mechanisms it is manifest and maintained could have a profound impact on transplantation in general and perhaps on other fields.

Accommodation of grafts: implications for health and disease

Accommodation refers to the acquired resistance of a graft to immune-mediated injury. It is typically observed after antibodies that would cause rejection of a graft are removed from a recipient and then later return. In addition to being induced in this manner, accommodation can occur spontaneously, without depleting antibodies. Indeed, we postulate spontaneous accommodation may be the most common outcome of clinical organ transplantation. The paper reviews the current understanding of accommodation, emphasizing recent advances and important questions. Among the recent advances are the discoveries of potentially broader relevance of accommodation for biology and immunology and pathways by which accommodation may be achieved. To investigate these pathways and to understand how accommodation begins and how it evolves, clinical organ transplants might offer a useful and incisive model.

Solid phase measurements of antibody and lectin binding to xenogenic carbohydrate antigens

OBJECTIVES

In future pig-to-man xenotransplantation it is important to master tools that identify potentially xenogenic alphagalactose (Galalpha) antigens in the doner tissue.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We have measured the binding potentials of Galalpha detecting lectins and antibodies, including a naturally occurring subfraction from human serum, to Galalpha containing neoglycoproteins and mouse laminin that were immobilized on microtiter plates.

RESULTS

Galalpha reactive antibodies with similar monosaccharide specificity have distinct structural preference for sugar ligands. Laminin and neoglycoproteins were treated with alpha-galactosidase and subsequently incubated with antibodies and lectins. The enzyme treatment was more deleterious on antibody binding than on lectin binding.

CONCLUSION

Antibodies and lectins may bind to different galactose determinants on the glycoproteins. Two anti-Galalpha1 antibodies that both have been raised against glycans on rabbit red blood cells may recognize Galalpha-antigens with varying specificities. Binding results obtained after digestion with alpha-galactosidase indicate that some xenoreactive Galalpha groups are not directly accessible for removal by the enzyme.

Pig cells that lack the gene for alpha1-3 galactosyltransferase express low levels of the gal antigen

BACKGROUND

The major antigen recognized on pig tissue by primate antibodies is a terminal galalpha1-3gal carbohydrate structure (gal antigen) present on glycolipids and glycoproteins. The production of animals from somatic cells allows for the inactivation of specific genes. It is anticipated that the complete inactivation of the gene encoding alpha1-3 galactosyltransferase, the enzyme that synthesizes the galalpha1-3gal linkage, will result in loss of that antigen from pig organs and tissue and will provide a survival benefit in pig-to-primate xenotransplants.

METHODS

Positive-negative selection was used to produce fetal-pig fibroblasts that were a heterozygous knockout (+/-) of the alpha1-3 galactosyltransferase gene. Nuclear transfer of these cells generated pig embryos and live born pigs with the appropriate genotype. Using a novel selection method with cells from (+/-) embryos, we produced homozygous (-/-) fetal-pig fibroblast cells.

RESULTS

Southern blot analysis of the alpha1-3 galactosyltransferase gene showed that we had produced (+/-) pig embryos, (+/-) live born pigs, and (-/-) pig-fetal fibroblast cells. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis with some, but not all, mouse anti-gal monoclonal antibodies and sensitized human serum showed that (-/-) cells still synthesized the gal antigen at 1 to 2% of the level of control heterozygous cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal-pig fibroblasts homozygous for the knockout of the alpha1-3 galactosyltransferase gene appear to express low but detectable levels of the gal antigen.

Genetic modification of xenografts

For nearly a century, xenotransplantation has been seen as a potential approach to replacing organs and tissues damaged by disease. Until recently, however, the application of xenotransplantation has seemed only a remote possibility. What has changed this perspective is the advent of genetic engineering of large animals; that is, the ability to add genes to and remove genes from lines of animals that could provide an enduring source of tissues and organs for clinical application. Genetic engineering could address the immunologic, physiologic and infectious barriers to xenotransplantation, and could allow xenotransplantation to provide a source of cells with defined and even controlled expression of exogenous genes. This communication will consider one perspective on the application of genetic engineering in xenotransplantation.

Reduction of alpha-galactosyl xenoantigen by expression of endo-beta-galactosidase C in pig endothelial cells

BACKGROUND

Elimination of the Galalpha1-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAc (alphaGal) epitope has been considered to be essential for successful pig-to-human xenotransplantation but, unfortunately, has not been achieved. Endo-beta-galactosidase C (EndoGalC) is an endoglycosidase which cleaves the Galbeta1-4GlcNAc linkage in the alphaGal epitope and digests out the Galalpha1-3Gal disaccharide. Because of its potent activity in physiological pH conditions, EndoGalC can remove alphaGal epitopes expressed on the cell surface of pig erythrocytes and vascular endothelial cells almost completely. In vivo or ex vivo administration of EndoGalC successfully reduced alphaGal expression in pig kidneys to an undetectable level, but alphaGal epitopes soon reappeared. Gene expression of EndoGalC in pig cells was attempted to solve this problem. As the terminal alphaGal is transferred in the trans-Golgi network by alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (alpha1,3GT), colocalization of the EndoGalC gene with the alpha1,3GT gene was expected to be one of the most reliable ways to eliminate the alphaGal epitope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The sequence of pig alpha1,3GT, including the cytoplasmic tail, transmembrane domain and stem region, was ligated upstream of EndoGalC, and the conjugated gene was expressed in pig aortic endothelial cells and COS7 cells. Following the introduction of the gene, the alphaGal epitope on pig aortic endothelial cells was effectively reduced. Transfection studies in COS7 cells using EndoGalC combined with alpha1,3GT showed that the expressed EndoGalC was localized not only inside, but also outside, the cells. The expression of EndoGalC conjugated with a murine immunoglobulin (Igkappa)-chain signal sequence also showed a similar effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the effectiveness of gene transfer with EndoGalC into pig endothelial cells, and strongly encourage us to produce transgenic animals with the expressed enzyme.

Enzymatic removal of alphaGal antigen in pig kidneys by ex vivo and in vivo administration of endo-beta-galactosidase C

Xenotransplantation using the pig as a donor species is considered to be a promising solution to the serious shortage of organ donors. Both hyperacute and acute vascular rejection (AVR) are believed to be associated with xenoreactive antibody binding to alphaGal epitopes on the pig vascular endothelial cells. Thus, suppression of this antigen-antibody reaction would appear essential for successful long-term xenograft survival. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of ex vivo and in vivo administration of recombinant endo-beta-galactosidase C (EndoGalC which, in previous in vitro studies, has been proven to digest alphaGal antigens completely) on alphaGal epitopes expressed in pig kidneys. Excised pig kidneys were perfused with University of Wisconsin solution containing EndoGalC and preserved for 4 h. After cold storage, the pig kidney was transplanted into another pig. Ex vivo perfusion and cold storage with EndoGalC reduced alphaGal epitope expression on vascular endothelial cells to an undetectable level. However, alphaGal antigens began to be expressed again as early as 1 day after transplantation. The digestion of alphaGal epitopes by EndoGalC did not cause any damage to the kidney graft. EndoGalC was intravenously administered to two pigs (15 kg), without causing any serious adverse effect. Twelve hours later, >98% of alphaGal antigens on pig red blood cells (RBCs) had been digested. Immunohistochemical study revealed almost complete elimination of alphaGal expression on vascular endothelial cells of the kidney graft 4 and 8 h after in vivo administration, but reappearance within 24 h. EndoGalC was administered to a baboon after an interval of 2 months. The second administration did not result in any serious toxicity or reduction in efficacy. These results suggest that ex vivo and in vivo administration of EndoGalC is simple and useful in removing alphaGal epitopes from pig organs. As the effect of EndoGalC is temporary, multiple in vivo administrations of EndoGalC would be required to inhibit the reappearance of alphaGal epitopes. Alternatively, transgenic techniques of introducing the gene for EndoGalC into the donor organ might permanently prevent alphaGal expression.

Therapeutic strategies for xenograft rejection

The increasing demand for transplantable organs over the past several decades has stimulated the idea of using animal organs in lieu of cadaveric organs in clinical transplantation. Pigs are now considered to be the most suitable source of organs for transplantation because of their abundant availability, their appropriate size, their relatively short gestation period, and the recent development in the technology to genetically manipulate them. In the past few years, some of the seemingly complex immunologic responses in pig-to-primate transplantation have been elucidated. This progress has allowed us to focus our efforts on devising specific therapeutic strategies to overcome or prevent some of the responses that contribute to rejection of the xenograft. In this article, we review the various approaches that might allow clinical xenotransplantation to come to fruition.