Association between Epstein-Barr virus infection and late acute transplant rejection in long-term transplant patients

Immunomodulatory Effect of COVID-19 on HLA-Antibody Profile in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background/Objectives: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to significant morbidity and mortality among kidney transplant recipients. SARS-CoV-2 has been hypothesized to cause an unusual immunological dysregulation triggering alloimmunity and leading to graft rejection. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study assessed 321 kidney transplant recipients who had COVID-19 infection. After the infection, patients' sera were tested for the presence of anti-HLA de novo DSA and non-DSA specificities. Logistic regression analysis and a stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the independent risk factors associated with the development of antibodies, adjusting for known confounders. The variables evaluated were acute COVID-19 characteristics (i.e., presentation, and need for hospitalization), demographic characteristics (i.e., age, gender, and primary renal disease), clinical characteristics (i.e., various comorbidities), and post-COVID-19 sequelae. Results: Anti-HLA de novo DSA developed in 18.7% of patients, while anti-HLA class I and class II non-DSA antibodies developed de novo in 84 (26.3%) and 83 (25.9%) patients, respectively. The development of DSA, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR antibodies was predicted by the history of graft rejection. Obesity appeared to be protective against the emergence of de novo DSA. De novo DSA and HLA-DR antibody formation was positively linked with intravenous immunoglobulin use, CMV-hyperimmune globulin use, and decreased doses of immunosuppression during acute infection. Better allograft function during the acute disease was a protective factor against the formation of HLA-DQ and HLA-DR antibodies. Positive predictors of de novo DSA development were graft biopsy and the reactivation of EBV after infection. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has an immunomodulatory effect and may be associated with an increased mortality in this population.

Pre-Existing Intrarenal Parvovirus B19 Infection May Relate to Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Patients

Viral infections can lead to transplant dysfunction, and their possible role in rejection is described. In total, 218 protocol biopsies performed in 106 children at 6, 12 and 24 months after transplantation were analyzed according to Banff '15. RT-PCR for cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, BK virus and Parvovirus B19 was performed on blood and bioptic samples at the time of transplant and each protocol biopsy. The prevalence of intrarenal viral infection increases between 6 and 12 months after transplantation (24% vs. 44%, p = 0.007). Intrarenal Parvovirus B19 infection is also associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (50% ABMR vs. 19% T-cell-mediated rejection, p = 0.04). Moreover, Parvovirus infection is higher at 12 months of follow-up and it decreases at 48 months (40.4% vs. 14%, p = 0.02), while in 24% of grafts, Parvovirus is already detectable at the moment of transplantation. Intrarenal Parvovirus B19 infection seems to be related to ABMR in pediatric kidney recipients. The graft itself may be the way of transmission for Parvovirus, so performance of a PCR test for Parvovirus B19 should be considered to identify high-risk patients. Intrarenal Parvovirus infection presents mainly during the first-year post-transplantation; thus, we recommend an active surveillance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in patients with intrarenal Parvovirus B19 infection during this period. Indeed, it should be considered a treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins in patients with intrarenal Parvovirus B19 infection and DSA positivity, even in the absence of ABMR criteria for kidney biopsy.

Infection, Rejection, and the Connection

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for people with end-stage organ disease. Immune-mediated transplant rejection is a common complication that decreases allograft survival. Although immunosuppression is required to prevent rejection, it also increases the risk of infection. Some infections, such as cytomegalovirus and BK virus, can promote inflammatory gene expression that can further tip the balance toward rejection. BK virus and other infections can induce damage that resembles the clinical pathology of rejection, and this complicates accurate diagnosis. Moreover, T cells specific for viral infection can lead to rejection through heterologous immunity to donor antigen directly mediated by antiviral cells. Thus, viral infections and allograft rejection interact in multiple ways that are important to maintain immunologic homeostasis in solid organ transplant recipients. Better insight into this dynamic interplay will help promote long-term transplant survival.

Risk factors for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after renal transplantation: Results of a large, multi-centre study

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is a very common and potentially lethal complication of renal transplantation. However, its risk factors and effects on transplant outcome are not well known. Here, we have analysed a large, multi-centre cohort (N = 512) in which 18.4% of the patients experienced EBV reactivation during the first post-transplant year. The patients were characterized pre-transplant and two weeks post-transplant by a multi-level biomarker panel. EBV reactivation was episodic for most patients, only 12 patients showed prolonged viraemia for over four months. Pre-transplant EBV shedding and male sex were associated with significantly increased incidence of post-transplant EBV reactivation. Importantly, we also identified a significant association of post-transplant EBV with acute rejection and with decreased haemoglobin levels. No further severe complications associated with EBV, either episodic or chronic, could be detected. Our data suggest that despite relatively frequent EBV reactivation, it had no association with serious complications during the first post-transplantation year. EBV shedding prior to transplantation could be employed as biomarkers for personalized immunosuppressive therapy. In summary, our results support the employed immunosuppressive regimes as relatively safe with regard to EBV. However, long-term studies are paramount to support these conclusions.

Analysis of BZLF1 mRNA detection in saliva as a marker for active replication of Epstein-Barr virus

Monitoring replicative Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection still remains a challenge in modern laboratory routine. The immediate-early protein BZLF1 mediates the switch between latent and replicate forms of EBV infection. The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of BZLF1 mRNA detection in saliva as a marker for active replication of the virus. Various specimens (saliva, plasma, PBMC) from 17 patients with EBV-induced infectious mononucleosis (IM) and 4 control patients were examined for expression of viral BZLF1 mRNA by means of real-time PCR. BZLF1 expression was correlated to the amount of viral DNA in either compartment. Digestion of plasma and saliva samples with DNase I allowed distinguishing between encapsidated and naked viral DNA. BZLF1 transcripts were found in all different types of specimens in varying frequencies. BZLF1 expression in saliva, PBMC, and plasma correlated with viral load in each compartment. Interestingly, those patients with detectable BZLF1 expression in saliva had a more severe course of infection with longer duration of hospitalization. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of BZLF1 mRNA detection in saliva specimens during replicative EBV infection. Its significance for the diagnosis of reactivated EBV infection, particularly under immunosuppression, has to be elucidated in further studies.

Tubuloreticular Inclusions in Renal Allografts Associate with Viral Infections and Donor-Specific Antibodies

The presence of tubuloreticular inclusions (TRIs) in native glomerular endothelial cells associates with viral infections and lupus nephritis. However, the associations of TRIs in renal transplant biopsy specimens are not known. We analyzed data from 316 patients who had a transplant biopsy with electron microscopy examination; 41 of 316 (13.0%) patients had TRIs. Patients with TRIs had significantly lower allograft survival rates (50.9%) than patients without TRIs (74.3%; P=0.03). Transplant glomerulopathy-free survival was also inferior in the TRI-positive group (57.5%) compared with the TRI-negative group (87.3%; P=0.002). Serologically, hepatitis C associated with the presence of TRIs (P=0.04) along with donor-specific antibodies (P=0.01). Furthermore, patients who were TRI positive were more likely than patients who were TRI negative to have had a previous rejection episode (P=0.02). On multivariate analysis, TRIs associated with prior rejection, viral infections, and class 1 HLA donor-specific antibodies. These results show that the presence of TRIs in renal allograft biopsy specimens associates with poor allograft outcomes and serologic evidence of viral infections and alloimmunity. The association with alloimmunity is a novel finding that warrants additional investigation.

Late acute rejection: incidence, risk factors, and effect on graft survival and function

Long-term graft survival and function has not kept pace with short-term success in kidney transplant (Tx) recipients. LAR ≥6 months post-Tx may contribute to lack of improvement; risk factors for LAR are not well known. Of 64 Tx recipients followed over six yr, 23 (35.9%) had LAR (LAR group) and 41 had no LAR (no LAR group). Of all variables, significant risk factors for LAR included DGF, (43.4% LAR vs. 14.6% in no LAR group, p = 0.0096); de novo DSA (65.2% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.003); mean COV% of TAC (41.8% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.03); and non-adherence (34.8% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.0043). DGF and DSA remained statistically significant (p = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively); COV% TAC had borderline significance (p = 0.057), and non-adherence was not significant on multivariate regression analysis. Patients with LAR had inferior graft survival and function, whereas graft function was stable in the no LAR group over a mean follow-up of 31.2 months. Patients with de novo DSA and DGF should be considered at risk of LAR; an early diagnosis and treatment of LAR may improve graft survival and function.

Viral Diseases of the Liver

Viruses other than the classic hepatotropic viruses, hepatitis A through E, may cause hepatic injury [1]. Among these are Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus (VZV), human herpes viruses (HHV) 6, 7, and 8, human parvovirus B19, and adenoviruses (Table 11.1). The clinical presentation of infections with these viruses may be indistinguishable from that associated with infection with classic hepatotropic viruses. The presentation ranges from mild and transient elevation of aminotransferases to acute hepatitis and can also lead to acute liver failure [1]. These viruses should be considered as possible etiologic agents in patients who have acute liver injury and whose serologic markers for the classic hepatotropic viruses are not indicative of an active infection [1]. In the present chapter, we review the clinical manifestations and the potential for immune-mediated liver injury associated with several of these viruses (see summary Table 11.2).

Epstein-Barr virus DNAemia is an early surrogate marker of the net state of immunosuppresion in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia (EBVd) may be a surrogate marker of the net state of immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation (SOT).

METHODS

A sample of 81 SOT recipients (53 renal, 21 liver, and 7 cardiac) from our institution (2003-2004) surviving more than 180 days was analyzed. EBVd was monitored in whole blood within the first 6 months using a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, duration and magnitude of EBVd were assessed as potential surrogate markers for the occurrence of late adverse events (>6 months): graft dysfunction, graft loss, death, and immunosuppression-related adverse events (IRAE), defined by the occurrence of solid organ tumor and opportunistic and severe infections.

RESULTS

A median of 10 blood samples per patient was screened. A total of 68 (84%) patients had detectable EBVd. Persistent EBVd (>30 days) was found in 40 (49.4%) and high EBVd (>1500 copies/mL) in 35 (43.3%). Multivariate analyses showed that persistent EVBd and high EBVd levels were independently related to the development of IRAE (hazard ratio, 2.95 and 4.32, respectively), whereas no significant associations were observed with late graft dysfunction or graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent and high levels of EBVd within the first 6 months after SOT are surrogate markers of increased risk of IRAE.

Safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab in the treatment of late acute renal allograft rejection

Safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab in the treatment of AR in children after renal transplantation is unknown. Five episodes of refractory late AR in three children (three episodes in patient 1 and a single episode in patients 2 and 3 occurring after 7-23 months of transplantation) were treated with one dose of alemtuzumab as a rescue therapy. Four episodes (Banff IA-IB) in patients 1 and 2 reversed fully or partially with alemtuzumab, whereas patient 3 with Banff IB-IIA AR failed to respond. Patient 1 had recurrent AR 5, 13, and 15 months later; first two episodes responded to retreatment with alemtuzumab, and the last episode was not treated causing allograft failure. Patient 2 had steroid-responsive AR after two months and had a functioning allograft 25 months later. A transient reduction in all lymphocyte subsets except natural killer cells occurred in all patients. Patient 3 (treated with steroids, Thymoglobulin(R) , intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab prior to alemtuzumab) suffered many bacterial infections during one-yr period after therapy. However, symptomatic viral infections were not observed in any of the children. Treatment with alemtuzumab may prolong allograft survival in multidrug-resistant AR but may not prevent recurrent AR in non-adherent children.

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions

Serological tests for antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens are frequently used to define infection status and for the differential diagnosis of other pathogens responsible for mononucleosis syndrome. Using only three parameters [viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 IgG],it is normally possible to distinguish acute from past infection: the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG without VCA IgM is typical of past infection. However, serological findings may sometimes be difficult to interpret as VCA IgG can be present without VCA IgM or EBNA-1 IgG in cases of acute or past infection, or all the three parameters may be detected simultaneously in the case of recent infection or during the course of reactivation. A profile of isolated EBNA-1 IgG may also create some doubts. In order to interpret these patterns correctly, it is necessary to determine IgG avidity, identify anti-EBV IgG and IgM antibodies by immunoblotting, and look for heterophile antibodies, anti-EA (D) antibodies or viral genome using molecular biology methods. These tests make it possible to define the status of the infection and solve any problems that may arise in routine laboratory practice.

Epstein-Barr virus: Silent companion or causative agent of chronic liver disease?

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has an important and multifaceted role in liver pathology. As a member of the herpes virus family, EBV establishes a persistent infection in more than 90% of adults. Besides acute hepatitis during primary infection, many clinical syndromes of interest for the hepatologist are associated with EBV infection. The role of EBV in the evolution of chronic hepatitis from hepatotropic viruses is considered. Chronic EBV-associated hepatitis is suspected in immunocompetent adults with compatible serology, suggestive histology and detection of the viral genome in the liver and/or increase of specific circulating cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. EBV is the main cause of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders which occur in up to 30% of cases. EBV-driven lymphoproliferative diseases are also recognized in non-immunocompromised patients and liver is involved in up to a third of the cases. Directly implicated in the pathogenesis of different tumors, EBV has a disputable role in hepatocellular carcinoma carcinogenesis. Further research is required in order to establish or reject the role of EBV in human liver cancer. This paper attempts to discuss the range of EBV-associated chronic liver diseases in immunocompetent patients, from mild, self-limiting mononuclear hepatitis to liver cancer.

Induction of pre-transplant Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection by donor blood transfusion in EBV-seronegative recipients may reduce risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in adolescent renal transplant patients: report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication following organ transplantation. The greatest risk is seen in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seronegative patients receiving allografts from EBV-seropositive donors. We demonstrate a new approach of pre-transplant prophylaxis of EBV-related PTLD, suggesting that, prior to living-related renal transplantation, blood transfusion from an EBV-seropositive donor to an EBV-seronegative recipient could induce primary EBV infection in the recipient, developing EBV immunity and decreasing risk of PTLD.

METHODS

Recipients underwent weekly donor-specific blood transfusion (3 x 100 mL) before transplantation. EBV-mRNA expression, viral load, serological tests, and clinical signs of EBV infection were assessed following blood transfusion.

RESULTS

We explored a new approach in 2 young EBV-seronegative renal allograft recipients. Both patients developed primary EBV infection following blood transfusion before transplantation and showed symptom-free seroconversion post-transplantation without persistent EBV activation. There were no signs of PTLD during 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A new effective and inexpensive approach is suggested for development of EBV immunity and probably for prophylaxis of EBV-associated PTLD.

Steroid-free immunosuppression in organ transplantation

Although steroids have been the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens to treat and prevent rejection in organ transplantation, the past decade has seen many successful attempts to minimize or eliminate steroid use. This has been undertaken to decrease the diverse side effects seen with chronic steroid treatment. These efforts have focused on both steroid avoidance and complete elimination, and have been successful across broad patient groups. The key to these efforts has been the adoption of induction protocols with either lymphocyte-depleting agents or anti-interleukin-2 strategies, coupled with the use of the newer maintenance immunosuppressants. In this review, we address the feasibility and benefits of steroid-free and steroid avoidance protocols in kidney, pancreas, liver, and heart transplantation.

Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient

Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and oncogenesis. Rapid and sensitive microbiologic assays for many of the common viruses after transplantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, quantitative molecular tests allow the individualization of antiviral therapies for prevention and treatment of infection. This advance is most prominent in the management of cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C viruses. Diagnostic advances have not been accompanied by the development of specific and nontoxic anti-viral agents or effective antiviral vaccines. Vaccines, where available, should be given to patients as early as possible and well in advance of transplantation to optimize the immune response. Studies of viral latency, reactivation, and the cellular effects of viral infection will provide clues for future strategies in prevention and treatment of viral infections.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is associated with an increased frequency of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) latently infected B lymphocytes in long-term renal transplant patients

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a common phenomenon in kidney transplant patients that might be a prestage of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Because the role of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) for PTLD development is well established, we wondered about the association between EBV and MGUS. Thus, B-cells from kidney transplant patients (25 with and 100 without MGUS) and from 100 healthy controls were analyzed for EBV latent (EBER1) and lytic (EA, VCA) gene expression by RT-nested PCR. The EBV load was measured by real-time PCR. A significantly higher EBV load and expression of the nonimmunogenic latency associated EBER 1 gene was observed in patients with MGUS compared to both control groups (P < .001). In addition, a rare detection of the highly immunogenic lytic transcripts demonstrated a linkage between latency-associated EBV infection and MGUS in transplant patients. This pattern was similar to EBV-associated B-cell lymphomas in nonimmunosuppressed patients. It contrasted with PTLD patients who express higher EBV loads and both lytic and latent EBV transcripts. These data suggest that transplant patients with MGUS demonstrate a more sufficient control of EBV-infected B-cells. Nevertheless, EBV monitoring should be performed in patients with EBV-associated MGUS for early detection of later PTLD.

Molecular parameters for precise diagnosis of asymptomatic Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in healthy carriers

Asymptomatic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivations periodically occur in oral mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues. Until now, EBV reactivation has been diagnosed by serologic profiles that suggest virus replication. Serologic responses, however, are delayed and do not necessarily indicate ongoing replicative activity. The aim of the present study was to establish in healthy carriers parameters for a molecular diagnosis of reactivated EBV infection. Recent studies emphasized the association of an increase in peripheral-B-cell viral load with replicative activity at remote sites. Therefore, real-time PCR was used to quantitate EBV genomes in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (viral load) and plasma samples (viremia) of 22 healthy EBV-seropositive blood donors over a period of 15 months. Furthermore, transcription of the immediate-early gene encoding BZLF1 was investigated in the PBMC of all volunteers. Serology suggested reactivation in nine donors, of whom all but one showed at least once a significant increase in viral load. Another five individuals also exhibited significant changes in viral load but no serologic response. Of the 13 volunteers with significant increases in viral load, 6 had a period of viremia accompanying the rise in viral load. A stable viral load without viremia and negative serology was seen in eight adults. BZLF1 mRNA was undetectable throughout. We conclude that for healthy subjects serology underestimates the frequency of asymptomatic EBV reactivations. Prospective examination of peripheral viral load and viremia is suitable for the exact diagnosis of EBV reactivation, which might be of advantage for immunocompromised patients in whom EBV reactivations are considerably harmful.

Acute rejection and graft survival in renal transplanted patients with viral diseases

Transplanted patients are susceptible to viral infections; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the features of acute rejections and the outcome of the renal graft in transplanted patients with herpes virus diseases. Renal biopsies from 30 renal transplanted patients undergoing early acute rejection (type IA and IB according to the Banff 97 classification) were evaluated. In total, 15 of these patients experienced cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Epstein-Barr virus disease within the first year following transplantation (group I) and 15 patients showed no evidence of viral infection (group II). No significant differences between the groups in terms of age, male/female ratio, living/cadaveric donor ratio, cold ischemia time, HLA A-B matching, pretransplant panel reactive antibody test, occurrence of post-transplant tubular necrosis, plasma levels of cyclosporin A and mean percent increase of serum creatinine at the time of the biopsy were observed. In group I biopsies, the mean number of interstitial plasma cells, as well as the mean number of CD79a-positive cells (B lymphocytes and plasma cells) was significantly higher than in group II (P<0.01 and <0.01, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the number of infections and the number of plasma cells (P<0.05). In transplanted patients, CMV can trigger the formation of anti-endothelial cell antibodies, which have been proposed to play a role in antibody-mediated rejections. We investigated whether a deposition of C4d, a marker of antibody-mediated reactions, was present in renal peritubular capillaries. In group I C4d deposition was found in five cases, while in group II it was not observed (P<0.05). In group I, 7/15 patients developed chronic allograft nephropathy vs 1/15 patients in group II (P<0.05). The estimated 1-, 5- and 8-year cumulative graft survival rates were 80, 66 and 57%, respectively, in group I, while in group II the estimated 8-year cumulative survival rate was 100% (P<0.05). In conclusion, acute rejection biopsies of patients with viral infections displayed plasma cell infiltrates and, in several cases, C4d deposition. Our study suggests a role of B lymphocytes in the pathology of these rejections and confirms the association between viral infections and poor graft survival.

Molecular diagnosis of viral infections in renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss biological and methodological aspects of virus infection monitoring in the renal transplant setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

New insights on the molecular pathogenesis of acute and persistent virus infections and rapid developments in real-time monitoring techniques are changing the current diagnostic routine. Accurate risk-assessment prior to transplantation and quantitative monitoring of parameters that reflect virus activity in the post-transplant period, including genome load fluctuations and aberrant viral mRNA or protein expression, provide early signs of undesired viral behaviour and allow pre-emptive therapeutic intervention. As opposed to prophylactic administration of antiviral drugs, a pre-emptive approach is more selective and will allow for antiviral immune responses to build, which may have a long-term beneficial effect. In addition, these virus-monitoring techniques allow for on-line assessment of therapeutic efficacy and rapid identification of emerging resistant strains. The combination of virus-monitoring techniques with rapid assessment of host immune responses using FACS and ELISPOT techniques, will improve overall patient management and long-term survival.

SUMMARY

Viral infections continue to be a significant complication in the transplant setting. Diagnostic monitoring allows timely and accurate therapeutic intervention. Knowledge of pathogenic mechanisms leading to disease is important for clinical decision making as well as for the selection of appropriate molecular parameters discriminating normal and disease-related activity of human pathogenic viruses. The increasing availability of effective antiviral drugs permits pre-emptive intervention that strongly depends on accurate viral monitoring procedures.

Successful treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease with prolonged rituximab treatment in intestinal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant Epstein-Barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) has a higher incidence after intestinal transplantation than after transplantation of other solid organs and is associated with a high mortality. A new anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, rituximab, has shown efficiency in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma, including PTLD, but its use has not yet been reported in intestinal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed five patients who were diagnosed with PTLD from March 1999 to August 2001, after intestinal transplantation. These patients were primarily managed with rituximab, associated with reduction or interruption of immunosuppression and antiviral therapy with ganciclovir and cytomegalovirus immune globulin. Rituximab was administered at weekly doses of 375 mg/m until full remission was ascertained, and the interval between doses was then increased. No patient received chemotherapy.

RESULTS

One patient had nonmalignant lymphoproliferation, and four had malignant PTLD, as assessed by histopathology and monoclonality of the tumor. Two pediatric patients had severe generalized disease. All patients had received OKT3 as treatment of rejection before developing PTLD. All tumors showed proliferation of CD20 cells and were positive for Epstein-Barr virus by in situ hybridization. All patients responded to rituximab therapy and have achieved full remission with a follow-up of 3 to 30 (median, 8) months.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged rituximab treatment, in association with reduction of immunosuppression and antiviral therapy, is highly efficient as part of the first-line treatment of CD20 B-cell PTLD after intestinal transplantation.

Longitudinal analysis of Epstein-Barr viral load in plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of transplanted patients by real-time polymerase chain reaction

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients and is caused by iatrogenic suppression of T cell function. Elevations in the Epstein-Barr viral (EBV) load in plasma (>1000 EBV copies/100 microL plasma) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) (>5000 EBV copies/microg PBMC DNA) as determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) have been shown to be sensitive indicators for the development of PTLD in patients.

METHODS

The diagnostic value of frequent monitoring of EB viral load in peripheral blood from 46 patients after heart transplantation was investigated compared with 21 healthy controls in a prospective longitudinal study. EB viral load was detected in PBMC and plasma using real-time quantitative (RQ)- polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays and compared with serological parameters of EBV infection or with the occurrence of CMV reactivations.

RESULTS

EB viral load was significantly increased in PBMC and in plasma from transplanted patients compared with healthy controls. Regarding levels and fluctuations of EB viral load in PBMC, patients were grouped in three distinct categories with high, intermediate, or low EB viral load. Although in one patient without PTLD, the EB viral load exceeded the threshold value for PTLD of 5000 EBV copies/microg PBMC DNA, all patients had an EB viral load in plasma of less than 1000 EBV copies/100 microL plasma. No correlation was found between the level of EB viral load and serological parameters of EBV reactivations in patients or in healthy control individuals. EBV and cytomegalovirus reactivations occurred independently in the majority of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

EB viral load measurements in plasma and PBMC of patients using RQ-PCR are superior to serology and are a powerful tool for monitoring transplanted patients.