Imipramine metabolism in relation to the sparteine oxidation polymorphism--a family study

Pharmacogenetics of drug oxidation via cytochrome P450 (CYP) in the populations of Denmark, Faroe Islands and Greenland

Denmark, the Faroe Islands and Greenland are three population-wise small countries on the northern part of the Northern Hemisphere, and studies carried out here on the genetic control over drug metabolism via cytochrome P450 have led to several important discoveries. Thus, CYP2D6 catalyzes the 2-hydroxylation, and CYP2C19 in part catalyzes the N-demethylation of imipramine. The phenomenon of phenocopy with regard to CYP2D6 was first described when Danish patients changed phenotype from extensive to poor metabolizers during treatment with quinidine. It was a Danish extensive metabolizer patient that became a poor metabolizer during paroxetine treatment, and this was due to the potent inhibition of CYP2D6 by paroxetine, which is also is metabolized by this enzyme. Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are also potent inhibitors of CYP2D6, and fluvoxamine is a potent inhibitor of both CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. The bioactivation of proguanil to cycloguanil is impaired in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers. The O-demethylation of codeine and tramadol to their respective my-opioid active metabolites, morphine and (+)-O-desmethyltramadol was markedly impaired in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers compared to extensive metabolizers, and this impairs the hypoalgesic effect of the two drugs in the poor metabolizers. The frequency of CYP2D6 poor metabolizers is 2%-3% in Greenlanders and nearly 15% in the Faroese population. The frequency of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers in East Greenlanders is approximately 10%. A study in Danish mono and dizygotic twins showed that the non-polymorphic 3-N-demethylation of caffeine catalyzed by CYP1A2 is subject to approximately 70% genetic control.

The impact of the CYP2D6-polymorphism on dose recommendations for current antidepressants

Cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 represents an extensively characterized polymorphic drug-metabolizing enzyme. The CYP2D6-gene is highly polymorphic and more than 70 different alleles are known currently. The activity of the enzyme markedly varies among individuals from poor to intermediate and extensive up to ultrarapid metabolism on the basis of the polymorphism of the CYP2D6 gene. Association studies provide growing evidence for the clinical importance of the CYP2D6 polymorphism investigating whether the CYP2D6 genotype distribution differs from that of the normal population either in patients with marked adverse effects or in nonresponders during treatment with CYP2D6 substrates. However, these scientifically important studies present less information for dose adjustments necessary to individualize pharmacotherapy in a given clinical case. With respect to psychopharmacological drug metabolism several antidepressants were characterized as being CYP2D6 substrates. Thus, this review summarizes dose recommendations of current antidepressants.

Effects of polymorphisms in CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 on trimipramine pharmacokinetics

Little is known about the impact of cytochrome P450 polymorphisms on the metabolism of trimipramine, which is still widely used as antidepressant due to its positive effect on sleep patterns. A single oral dose of 75 mg trimipramine was given to 42 healthy volunteers selected according to their CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 genotypes. The reference group included 8 subjects with homozygous active wild-type genotypes of all 3 enzymes (EM). This group was compared with 7 intermediate (IM) with 1 and 7 poor metabolizers (PM) with zero active alleles of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, respectively, and with 4 subjects with the genotype CYP2C9*3/*3. Pharmacokinetics of trimipramine and its demethylated metabolite strongly depended on the CYP2D6 genotype. Median oral clearance of trimipramine was 276 L/h (range 180-444) in the reference group but only 36 L/h (range 24-48) in CYP2D6 PMs (P < 0.001). These differences could only be explained by an effect of CYP genotypes on both parameters, systemic clearance and bioavailability, the latter being at least 3-fold higher in CYP2D6 PMs than in the reference group. The desmethyltrimipramine area under the concentration-time curve was 40-fold greater in CYP2D6 PMs than in the reference group (1.7 vs. 0.04 mg/L x h in EMs), but below the quantification limit in most carriers of deficiencies of CYP2C19 or CYP2C9. This indicates that both CYP2C enzymes contribute to the demethylation of desmethyltrimipramine and CYP2D6 to further metabolism.

Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism

Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is the main (or partial) cause for large differences in the pharmacokinetics of a number of clinically important drugs. On the basis of their ability to metabolise (S)-mephenytoin or other CYP2C19 substrates, individuals can be classified as extensive metabolisers (EMs) or poor metabolisers (PMs). Eight variant alleles (CYP2C19*2 to CYP2C19*8) that predict PMs have been identified. The distribution of EM and PM genotypes and phenotypes shows wide interethnic differences. Nongenetic factors such as enzyme inhibition and induction, old age and liver cirrhosis can also modulate CYP2C19 activity. In EMs, approximately 80% of doses of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole seem to be cleared by CYP2C19, whereas CYP3A is more important in PMs. Five-fold higher exposure to these drugs is observed in PMs than in EMs of CYP2C19, and further increases occur during inhibition of CYP3A-catalysed alternative metabolic pathways in PMs. As a result, PMs of CYP2C19 experience more effective acid suppression and better healing of duodenal and gastric ulcers during treatment with omeprazole and lansoprazole compared with EMs. The pharmacoeconomic value of CYP2C19 genotyping remains unclear. Our calculations suggest that genotyping for CYP2C19 could save approximately 5000 US dollars for every 100 Asians tested, but none for Caucasian patients. Nevertheless, genotyping for the common alleles of CYP2C19 before initiating PPIs for the treatment of reflux disease and H. pylori infection is a cost effective tool to determine appropriate duration of treatment and dosage regimens. Altered CYP2C19 activity does not seem to increase the risk for adverse drug reactions/interactions of PPIs. Phenytoin plasma concentrations and toxicity have been shown to increase in patients taking inhibitors of CYP2C19 or who have variant alleles and, because of its narrow therapeutic range, genotyping of CYP2C19 in addition to CYP2C9 may be needed to optimise the dosage of phenytoin. Increased risk of toxicity of tricyclic antidepressants is likely in patients whose CYP2C19 and/or CYP2D6 activities are diminished. CYP2C19 is a major enzyme in proguanil activation to cycloguanil, but there are no clinical data that suggest that PMs of CYP2C19 are at a greater risk for failure of malaria prophylaxis or treatment. Diazepam clearance is clearly diminished in PMs or when inhibitors of CYP2C19 are coprescribed, but the clinical consequences are generally minimal. Finally, many studies have attempted to identify relationships between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype and susceptibility to xenobiotic-induced disease, but none of these are compelling.

CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype-based dose recommendations for antidepressants: a first step towards subpopulation-specific dosages

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to provide distinct dose recommendations for antidepressants based on the genotypes of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. This approach may be a useful complementation to clinical monitoring and therapeutic drug monitoring.

METHOD

Our literature search covered 32 antidepressants marketed in Europe, Canada, and the United States. We evaluated studies which had compared pharmacokinetic parameters of antidepressants among poor, intermediate, extensive and ultrarapid metabolizers.

RESULTS

For 14 antidepressants, distinct dose recommendations for extensive, intermediate and poor metabolizers of either CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were given. For the tricyclic antidepressants, dose reductions around 50% were generally recommended for poor metabolizers of substrates of CYP2D6 or CYP2C19, whereas differences were smaller for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

We have provided preliminary average dose suggestions based on the phenotype or genotype. This is a first attempt to apply the new pharmacogenetics to suggest dose-regimens that take the differences in drug metabolic capacity into account.

CYP2D6 genotyping as an alternative to phenotyping for determination of metabolic status in a clinical trial setting

The emerging application of pharmacogenomics in the clinical trial setting requires careful comparison with more traditional phenotyping methodologies, particularly in the drug metabolism area where phenotyping is used extensively. The research objectives of this study were 1) to assess the utility of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotyping as an alternative to traditional phenotyping as a predictor of poor metabolizer status; 2) to identify issues for consideration when implementing CYP2D6 genotyping in clinical trials; and 3) to outline the advantages and disadvantages of CYP2D6 genotyping compared with phenotyping. DNA samples obtained from 558 previously phenotyped individuals were blindly genotyped at the CYP2D6 locus, and the genotype-phenotype correlation was then determined. The CYP2D6 genotyping methodology successfully predicted all but 1 of the 46 poor metabolizer subjects, and it was determined that this 1 individual had a novel (presumably inactive) mutation within the coding region. In addition, we identified 2 subjects with CYP2D6 genotypes indicative of poor metabolizers who had extensive metabolizer phenotypes as determined by dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios. This finding suggests that traditional phenotyping methods do not always offer 100% specificity. Our results suggest that CYP2D6 genotyping is a valid alternative to traditional phenotyping in a clinical trial setting, and in some cases may be better. We also discuss some of the issues and considerations related to the use of genotyping in clinical trials and medical practice.