Pharmacogenetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor response: a 6-month follow-up

Altered expression of somatostatin signaling molecules and clock genes in the hippocampus of subjects with substance use disorder

Substance use disorders are a debilitating group of psychiatric disorders with a high degree of comorbidity with major depressive disorder. Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances are commonly reported in people with substance use disorder and major depression and associated with increased risk of relapse. Hippocampal somatostatin signaling is involved in encoding and consolidation of contextual memories which contribute to relapse in substance use disorder. Somatostatin and clock genes also have been implicated in depression, suggesting that these molecules may represent key converging pathways involved in contextual memory processing in substance use and major depression. We used hippocampal tissue from a cohort of subjects with substance use disorder (n = 20), subjects with major depression (n = 20), subjects with comorbid substance use disorder and major depression (n = 24) and psychiatrically normal control subjects (n = 20) to test the hypothesis that expression of genes involved in somatostatin signaling and clock genes is altered in subjects with substance use disorder. We identified decreased expression of somatostatin in subjects with substance use disorder and in subjects with major depression. We also observed increased somatostatin receptor 2 expression in subjects with substance use disorder with alcohol in the blood at death and decreased expression in subjects with major depression. Expression of the clock genes Arntl, Nr1d1, Per2 and Cry2 was increased in subjects with substance use disorder. Arntl and Nr1d1 expression in comparison was decreased in subjects with major depression. We observed decreased expression of Gsk3β in subjects with substance use disorder. Subjects with comorbid substance use disorder and major depression displayed minimal changes across all outcome measures. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase in history of sleep disturbances in subjects with substance use disorder. Our findings represent the first evidence for altered somatostatin and clock gene expression in the hippocampus of subjects with substance use disorder and subjects with major depression. Altered expression of these molecules may impact memory consolidation and contribute to relapse risk.

The role of CLOCK gene in psychiatric disorders: Evidence from human and animal research

The circadian clock system drives daily rhythms in physiology, metabolism, and behavior in mammals. Molecular mechanisms of this system consist of multiple clock genes, with Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput (CLOCK) as a core member that plays an important role in a wide range of behaviors. Alterations in the CLOCK gene are associated with common psychiatric disorders as well as with circadian disturbances comorbidities. This review addresses animal, molecular, and genetic studies evaluating the role of the CLOCK gene on many psychiatric conditions, namely autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and substance use disorder. Many animal experiments focusing on the effects of the Clock gene in behavior related to psychiatric conditions have shown consistent biological plausibility and promising findings. In humans, genetic and gene expression studies regarding disorder susceptibility, sleep disturbances related comorbidities, and response to pharmacological treatment, in general, are in agreement with animal studies. However, the number of controversial results is high. Literature suggests that the CLOCK gene exerts important influence on these conditions, and influences the susceptibility to phenotypes of psychiatric disorders.

Serotonin pathway polymorphisms and the treatment of major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders

While antidepressants are widely used to treat major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders, only half of the patients will respond to antidepressant treatment and only a third of patients will experience a remission of symptoms. Identification of genetic biomarkers that predict antidepressant treatment response could thus greatly improve current clinical practice by providing guidance on which drug to use for which patient. Most antidepressant drugs for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders have effects on the serotonergic neurotransmitter system; thus, genetic polymorphisms in the genes involved in this pathway represent logical candidates for investigation. This article reviews recent findings on the pharmacogenetics of antidepressant drugs with a focus on serotonergic pathway polymorphisms and discusses future clinical applications.

Advances in biomarkers of major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by mood, vegetative, cognitive, and even psychotic symptoms and signs that can cause substantial impairments in quality of life and functioning. Biomarkers are measurable indicators that could help diagnosing MDD or predicting treatment response. In this chapter, lipid profiles, immune/inflammation, and neurotrophic factor pathways that have long been implicated in the pathogenesis of MDD are discussed. Then, pharmacogenetics and epigenetics of serotonin transport and its metabolism pathway, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and abnormality of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis also revealed new biomarkers. Lastly, new techniques, such as proteomics and metabolomics, which allow researchers to approach the studying of MDD with new directions and make new discoveries are addressed. In the future, more data are needed regarding pathophysiology of MDD, including protein levels, single nucleotide polymorphism, epigenetic regulation, and clinical data in order to better identify reliable and consistent biomarkers for diagnosis, treatment choice, and outcome prediction.

Are there meaningful biomarkers of treatment response for depression?

During the past decades, the prevalence of affective disorders has been on the rise globally, with only one out of three patients achieving remission in acute treatment with antidepressants. The identification of physiological markers that predict treatment course proves useful in increasing therapeutic success. On the basis of well-documented, recent findings in depression research, we highlight and discuss the most promising biomarkers for antidepressant therapy response. These include genetic variants and gene expression profiles, proteomic and metabolomic markers, neuroendocrine function tests, electrophysiology and imaging techniques. Ultimately, this review proposes an integrative use of biomarkers for antidepressant treatment outcome.

From pharmacogenetics to pharmacogenomics: the way toward the personalization of antidepressant treatment

OBJECTIVE

Major depressive disorder is the most common psychiatric disorder, worldwide, yet response and remission rates are still unsatisfactory. The identification of genetic predictors of antidepressant (AD) response could provide a promising opportunity to improve current AD efficacy through the personalization of treatment. The major steps and findings along this path are reviewed together with their clinical implications and limitations.

METHOD

We systematically reviewed the literature through MEDLINE and Embase database searches, using any word combination of "antidepressant," "gene," "polymorphism," "pharmacogenetics," "genome-wide association study," "GWAS," "response," and "adverse drug reactions." Experimental works and reviews published until March 2012 were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Numerous genes pertaining to several functional systems were associated with AD response. The more robust findings were found for the following genes: solute carrier family 6 (neurotransmitter transporter), member 4; serotonin receptor 1A and 2A; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; and catechol-O-methyltransferase. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) provided many top markers, even if none of them reached genome-wide significance.

CONCLUSIONS

AD pharmacogenetics have not produced any knowledge applicable to routine clinical practice yet, as results were mainly inconsistent across studies. Despite this, the rising awareness about methodological deficits of past studies could allow for the identication of more suitable strategies, such as the integration of the GWAS approach with the candidate gene approach, and innovative methodologies, such as pathway analysis and study of depressive endophenotypes.

Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant drugs: current clinical practice and future directions

While antidepressants are widely used to treat mood and anxiety disorders, only half of the patients will respond to antidepressant treatment and only one-third of patients experience a full remission of symptoms. The identification of genetic biomarkers that predict antidepressant-treatment response can improve current clinical practice. This is an emerging field known as pharmacogenetics, which comprises of genetic studies on both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of treatment response. Recent studies on antidepressant-treatment response have focused on both aspects of pharmacogenetics research, identifying new candidate genes that may predict better treatment response for patients. This paper reviews recent findings on the pharmacogenetics of antidepressant drugs and future clinical applications. Ultimately, these studies should lead to the use of genetic testing to guide the use of antidepressants in clinical practice.

Tryptophan hydroxylase 2 gene is associated with major depressive disorder in a female Chinese population

BACKGROUND

Previous candidate gene studies of major depressive disorder (MDD) have provided inconclusive evidence of association for genes with strong biological rationale for MDD. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of tryptophan hydroxylase 2 gene with MDD and its treatment response in the Chinese Han population.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty eight depressed patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were recruited for the study. 371 normal controls were recruited from local community. Patients and normal controls were genotyped for TPH2 (rs4290270 and rs7305115) variants by polymerase chain reaction. Male and female subjects were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

No differences were found in the frequencies of the single alleles and genotypes of the tested polymorphisms between MDD patients and normal group. The frequency of the A-A haplotype was significantly higher in female MDD compared to healthy female controls (P<0.05). No significant association with treatment response was discovered in haplotype and single-marker analysis.

LIMITATIONS

This study lacks a placebo control and we cannot definitively exclude the possibility that some patients in the responder group responded to the placebo effect alone.

CONCLUSION

The result suggests that TPH2 gene may have a gender dependent effect on susceptibility to MDD but not with its treatment response in Chinese Han population. Further studies are needed to replicate the association that we observed.

Simultaneous genotyping of multiple polymorphisms in human serotonin transporter gene and detection of novel allelic variants

The serotonin transporter, called SLC6A4, SERT or 5-HTT, modulates neurotransmission by removal of serotonin from the synapse of serotonergic neurons, facilitating serotonin reuptake into the presynaptic terminus. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors block the action of the serotonin transporter and are used to treat depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders. Three polymorphisms in the 5-HTT gene have been implicated in treatment response and neuropsychiatric disorders. A 44-bp promoter ins/del polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) produces primarily long and/or short alleles due to either 14 (short) or 16 (long) repeats of variably conserved 20-23 bp units. Also implicated, a 17-18 bp variable number tandem repeat found in intron2 (StIn2) is expressed as triallelic content with 9, 10, or 12 repeats (StIn2.9, StIn2.10 or StIn2.12). Finally, a single nucleotide polymorphism rs25531 located within the promoter polymorphic-linked region alters the function of the long promoter allele. We developed a PCR-based fragment analysis assay, which is analyzed on an ABI sequencer, whereby we are able to detect all three genotypes simultaneously. Using this technique, we identified novel sequences, which demonstrate promoter repeat regions containing (1) a 17 repeat with rs25531 A/G polymorphism, (2) two with 18-repeat units, (3) one with 20-repeat units and (4) a 24-repeat sequence. The novel repeats were confirmed by direct sequencing of gel-purified amplicons.

Antidepressant response and the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region

BACKGROUND

The serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) has been proposed as a predictor of antidepressant response. Insertion or deletion of a 44-base pair-long region gives rise to short "S" and long "L" forms of the promoter region, the "S" form being associated with reduced serotonin transporter expression.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of 5-HTTLPR on antidepressant response and remission rates. Data were obtained from 28 studies with 5408 participants. Three genotype comparisons were tested-SS versus (SL or LL), (SS or SL) versus LL, and SS versus LL.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant effect on antidepressant response. Compared with L carriers, there was an apparent effect of the SS genotype on remission rate (relative risk: .88; 95% confidence interval: .79-.98; p = .02). However, after trim and fill correction for missing data, the effect disappeared (relative risk: .92; 95% confidence interval: .81-1.05; p = .23), indicating that the initial significant effect was likely the result of publication bias. No significant effect on remission rate was seen for SS versus LL and SS/SL versus LL. Substantial unexplained heterogeneity of effect sizes was observed between studies, pointing to additional interacting factors contributing to an association in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-HTTLPR biallelic short/long polymorphism by itself does not seem to usefully predict antidepressant response.

The role of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders

Although effective treatment for mood and anxiety disorders have been available for more than 40 years, 30-50% of depressed patients and 25% of patients with anxiety disorder do not respond sufficiently to first-line treatment with antidepressants. Genetic factors are supposed to play a major role in both variation of treatment response and incidence of adverse effects to medication. So far, candidate genes of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of antidepressants have been investigated, and associations between several candidate genes and response to antidepressants are reported. Two functional polymorphisms of the serotonin transporter gene, 5-HTTLPR and STin2 have been investigated in a large number of pharmacogenetic studies of depression; other candidate genes include serotonin receptor genes, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, P-glycoprotein (located in the blood-brain barrier), G-proteins, TPH1 and TPH2, MAOA, the noradrenaline transporter gene, FKBP5, or cytochrome P450 (CYP450) genes. CYP450 genes play a major role in the metabolism of a substantial part of psychotropics, including antidepressants, and the first estimates of dosage adjustments for antidepressants have been provided based on metabolizer status. Genome-wide association studies that use large numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms to screen the entire genome for alleles that influence a trait are now feasible, and the results of the first genome-wide association studies of antidepressant treatment outcome will soon be available. The current review not only updates pharmacogenetic research in depression but also focuses on antidepressant treatment response in anxiety disorders.

Pharmacogenetics of antidepressant response: an update

The past few decades have witnessed much progress in the field of pharmacogenetics. The identification of the genetic background that regulates the antidepressant response has benefited from these advances. This review focuses on the pharmacogenetics of the antidepressant response through the analysis and discussion of the most compelling evidence in this line of research. Online databases (Medline and PsycINFO) have been searched and the most replicated association findings relating to the genetics of the antidepressant response have been reported and discussed. Some replicated findings in the literature have suggested the serotonin transporter promoter (5-HTTLPR), serotonin receptor 1A (HTR1A), serotonin receptor 2A (HTR2A), brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), corticotropin releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) as putative regulators of the antidepressant response. A high rate of failure of replication has also been reported. Pharmacogenetics will hopefully provide the basis for personalised antidepressant treatment that is able to maximise the probability of a good response and to minimise side effects; however, this goal is not achievable at the moment. The extent of the validity of the replicated findings and the reasons for the poor results obtained from studies of the pharmacogenetics of the antidepressant response are discussed.

Differential sensitivity to SSRI and tricyclic antidepressants in juvenile and adult mice of three strains

Clinical studies have shown differential efficacy of several antidepressants in children and adolescents compared to adults, yet few animal studies have sought to characterize this phenomenon. We compared effects of fluoxetine and imipramine in two common behavioral assays that hold high predictive validity for antidepressant activity, tail suspension and forced swim test, using juvenile (5 weeks) and adult (12 weeks) mice from 3 strains. C57BL/6J-Tyr(c-Brd) (C57), hybrid C57BL/6J-Tyr(c-Brd)x129S5/SvEvBrd (F2), and Balb/cAnNTac (Balb/C) mice were tested in forced swim test and tail suspension after i.p. dosing with either fluoxetine or imipramine. Brain tissues were analyzed to evaluate levels of VMAT2, a possible modulator of age-dependent sensitivity to antidepressants. Imipramine had more consistent antidepressant effect across age groups and strains. Imipramine increased struggle in mice of both ages. Fluoxetine did not have an effect on immobility in Balb/C of both ages in tail suspension. Fluoxetine also did not increase forced swim struggle behavior in juvenile mice of all strains, but was effective in increasing struggle in adults. Juvenile mice had higher immobility and lower struggle than adults in forced swim, and juveniles also had higher immobility in tail suspension test for Balb/C and C57. In addition, VMAT2 levels were increased in juveniles. These results confirm that standard antidepressants produce effects in both juveniles and adults but age-related differences were evident in both tests. Further examination of these effects is needed to determine whether it may be related to age-dependent difference in the clinical response to antidepressants of these classes.

Circadian rhythm disturbances in depression

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review progress in understanding the mechanisms that underlie circadian and sleep rhythms, and their role in the pathogenesis and treatment of depression.

METHODS

Literature was selected principally by Medline searches, and additional reports were identified based on ongoing research activities in the authors' laboratory.

RESULTS

Many physiological processes show circadian rhythms of activity. Sleep and waking are the most obvious circadian rhythms in mammals. There is considerable evidence that circadian and sleep disturbances are important in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Depressed patients often show altered circadian rhythms, sleep disturbances, and diurnal mood variation. Chronotherapies, including bright light exposure, sleep deprivation, and social rhythm therapies, may be useful adjuncts in non-seasonal and seasonal depression. Antidepressant drugs have marked effects on circadian processes and sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent progress in understanding chronobiological and sleep regulation mechanisms may provide novel insights and avenues into the development of new pharmacological and behavioral treatment strategies for mood disorders.

The MAOA T941G polymorphism and short-term treatment response to mirtazapine and paroxetine in major depression

This study investigated the possible association of the MAOA T941G gene variant with differential antidepressant response to mirtazapine and/or paroxetine in 102 patients with major depression (DSM-IV criteria) participating in a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Female mirtazapine-treated patients homozygous for the T-allele had a significantly faster and better treatment response than TG/GG-patients. In males, we failed to show an association between MAOA T941G gene variant and mirtazapine response. In the paroxetine-treated group, there were no significant differences in treatment response between MAOA T941G genotype groups. Time course of response and antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine, but not paroxetine, seem to be influenced in a clinically relevant manner by this allelic variation within the MAOA gene, at least in female patients. An independent replication of our finding is needed. If replicated, genotyping of this locus could become a promising tool to predict response to mirtazapine treatment in females suffering from major depression.

Interaction between TPH1 and GNB3 genotypes and electroconvulsive therapy in major depression

We studied the association between tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) A218C and G-protein beta-3 subunit (GNB3) C825T polymorphisms and treatment response in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The sample consisted of 119 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 398 controls. Neither TPH1 nor GNB3 polymorphisms are associated with treatment response. However, subjects carrying TPH1 CC genotype are more likely to belong to the patient sample than to the controls. In female subjects, T-allele of GNB3 polymorphism increases the risk of being a treatment-resistant patient with MDD. Moreover, in females the combination of TPH1 CC and GNB3 CT + TT genotype is associated with an increased risk of belonging to the patient group.

A proposal of decision tree to screen putative antidepressants using forced swim and tail suspension tests

Interstrain mice variability in response to antidepressant drugs has been reported in the most commonly utilized behavioural animal models of depression: the tail suspension test (TST) and the forced swimming test (FST). The behaviour of mice was examined in both tests for screening various antidepressants with different biochemical mechanism of action. Previous studies have revealed that drug sensitivity depends on the strain and test used. Swiss mice is the most sensitive strain to detect serotonin and/or noradrenaline antidepressants whereas C57BL/6J was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (dopaminergic agent) using the FST. In the TST, all antidepressants studied decreased the immobility time in Swiss and C57BL/6J strains. Detection of an antidepressant-like activity could be performed using only one test (TST with Swiss mice or FST with Swiss and C57Bl/6 Rj mice), but both tests are necessary to conclude on the mechanism of action.