Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate agonists and antagonists in rats discriminating amphetamine

Saline as a vehicle control does not alter ventilation in male CD-1 mice

Saline (0.9% NaCl) is used in clinical and research settings as a vehicle for intravenous drug administration. While saline is a standard control in mouse studies, there are reports of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis in high doses. It remains unknown if metabolic acidosis occurs in mice and/or if compensatory increases in breathing frequency and tidal volume accompany saline administration. It was hypothesized that saline administration alters blood pH and the pattern of breathing in conscious CD-1 male mice exposed to air or hypoxia (10% O2 , balanced N2 ). Unrestrained barometric plethysmography was used to quantify breathing frequency (breaths/min; bpm), tidal volume (VT; mL/breath/10 g body weight (BW)), and minute ventilation (VE; mL/min/10 g BW) in two designs: (1) 11-week-old mice with no saline exposure (n = 11) compared to mice with 7 days of 0.9% saline administration (intraperitoneal, i.p.; 10 mL/kg body mass; n = 6). and (2) 17-week-old mice tested before (PRE) and after 1 day (POST1, n = 6) or 7 days (POST7, n = 5) of saline (i.p.; 10 mL/kg body mass). There were no differences when comparing frequency, VT, or VE between groups for either design with room air or hypoxia exposures. Hypoxia increased frequency, VT, and VE compared to room air. Moreover, conscious blood sampling showed no differences in pH, paCO2 , paO2 , or HCO3- in mice without or with 7 days of saline. These findings reveal no differences in ventilation following 1 and/or 7 days of saline administration in mice. Therefore, the use of 0.9% saline as a control is supported for studies evaluating the control of breathing in mice.

Pharmacology of hallucinations: several mechanisms for one single symptom?

Hallucinations are complex misperceptions, that principally occur in schizophrenia or after intoxication induced by three main classes of drugs: psychostimulants, psychedelics, and dissociative anesthetics. There are at least three different pharmacological ways to induce hallucinations: (1) activation of dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) with psychostimulants, (2) activation of serotonin 5HT2A receptors (HT2ARs) with psychedelics, and (3) blockage of glutamate NMDA receptors (NMDARs) with dissociative anesthetics. In schizophrenia, the relative importance of NMDAR and D2R in the occurrence of hallucinations is still debated. Slight clinical differences are observed for each etiology. Thus, we investigated whether the concept of hallucination is homogenous, both clinically and neurobiologically. A narrative review of the literature is proposed to synthesize how the main contributors in the field have approached and tried to solve these outstanding questions. While some authors prefer one explanatory mechanism, others have proposed more integrated theories based on the different pharmacological psychosis models. In this review, such theories are discussed and faced with the clinical data. In addition, the nosological aspects of hallucinations and psychosis are addressed. We suggest that if there may be common neurobiological pathways between the different pharmacological systems that are responsible for the hallucinations, there may also be unique properties of each system, which explains the clinical differences observed.

Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Discriminative stimulus effects of NMDA, AMPA, and mGluR5 glutamate receptor ligands in methamphetamine-trained rats

Glutamate contributes to the reinforcing and stimulant effects of methamphetamine, yet its potential role in the interoceptive stimulus properties of methamphetamine is unknown. In this study, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate methamphetamine [1.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally] from saline in a standard operant discrimination task. The effects of methamphetamine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channel blockers, MK-801 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and ketamine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); polyamine site NMDA receptor antagonist, ifenprodil (1-10 mg/kg); α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (1-10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); and metabotropic 5 glutamate receptor antagonist, 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (1-10 mg/kg), given alone were determined in substitution tests. The effects of MK-801 (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg), ketamine (1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg), ifenprodil (5.6 mg/kg), 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (5.6 mg/kg), and 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (5.6 mg/kg) were also tested in combination with methamphetamine to assess for alterations in the methamphetamine cue. In substitution tests, none of the test drugs generalized to the methamphetamine cue. However, ketamine and ifenprodil produced significant leftward shifts in the methamphetamine dose-response curve. In addition, the potention by MK-801 nearly attained significance. These results suggest that blockade of the NMDA receptor augments the interoceptive stimulus properties of methamphetamine.

Amphetamine-induced place preference and conditioned motor sensitization requires activation of tyrosine kinase receptors in the hippocampus

The environmental context in which abused drugs are taken contribute to the drug experience and is a powerful and persistent stimulus to elicit memories of that experience even in the abstinent addict. Using amphetamine (AMPH) as the unconditioned stimulus, the present study compared two popular context-dependent paradigms in rats, conditioned motor sensitization (CMS) and conditioned place preference (CPP), to ascertain whether particular brain regions were differentially involved. The neuronal substrates underlying these context-dependent behaviors are poorly understood, but regulators of the neuronal plasticity that accompany learning, such as neurotrophic factors and their cognate tyrosine kinase receptors (e.g., TrkB), are credible candidates. We found a significant elevation of TrkB-like immunoreactivity specifically in CA3/dentate gyrus (DG) subregions of the hippocampus after AMPH (0.3 mg/kg)-induced CPP, but not in the delayed-paired (control) AMPH condition. A higher AMPH dose (1.0 mg/kg) induced both CPP and CMS and elevated TrkB in the CA3/DG as well as in the nucleus accumbens shell. The development of both conditioned behaviors was blocked by intra-CA3/DG infusion of the Trk inhibitor K-252a. These findings reveal that CPP and CMS are induced by different doses of AMPH and are associated with TrkB changes in particular brain regions. Moreover, Trk receptors in the hippocampus are critical mediators of the neuronal changes necessary for inducing both forms of conditioning. Thus, although these two conditioning models are distinct, because they are commonly regulated by the hippocampal Trk system, these receptors may be a therapeutic target for attenuating the significance of contextual cues that otherwise strengthen the addictive properties of abused drugs.

Chlormethiazole potentiates the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in rats

Chlormethiazole is a positive modulator of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) receptors used in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal seizures. It recently has been reported to attenuate seizures engendered by acute and repeated exposure to cocaine in mice and neurotoxic effects of methamphetamine in rats. The aim of the present study was to determine whether chlormethiazole could also attenuate the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, a behavior predictive of the subjective effects of methamphetamine in humans. In Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg methamphetamine [intraperitoneally (i.p.)] from saline under a fixed-ratio schedule of food delivery, the ability of chlormethiazole (i.p.) to (1) substitute for methamphetamine, (2) antagonize effects of methamphetamine and to (3) shift the methamphetamine dose-effect function was investigated. Chlormethiazole (18 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) partially substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine when administered alone (maximum group average, 60% responses on the methamphetamine-appropriate lever). Chlormethiazole did not attenuate effects of methamphetamine when coadministered with the training dose of methamphetamine. Instead, chlormethiazole potentiated the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine as demonstrated by a significant (about 2.5-fold) leftward and upward shift in the methamphetamine dose-effect function in the presence of chlormethiazole (10 mg/kg). In conclusion, the present findings suggest that there is a behavioral interaction between methamphetamine and chlormethiazole. The profile of this interaction is qualitatively different from that of methamphetamine and classical GABAergic drugs (i.e., benzodiazepines and barbiturates), suggesting the involvement of non-GABAergic mechanisms in the effects produced by chlormethiazole.