Clonidine and yohimbine in opioid-dependent humans responding under a naloxone novel-response discrimination procedure

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of Isradipine During Outpatient Buprenorphine Stabilization and Detoxification: A Pilot Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background:

Given the immense burden of the widespread use of opioids around the world, exploring treatments that improve drug use outcomes, and craving and withdrawal measures in individuals with opioid use disorder is crucial. This pilot study examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the L-type calcium-channel blocker isradipine (ISR) to improve drug use outcomes, and craving and withdrawal measures during buprenorphine (BUP)/ISR stabilization and subsequent taper in opioid-dependent individuals.

Methods:

Participants were stabilized on BUP sublingual tablets within the first 2 days of week 1, were then randomized and inducted on either ISR or placebo, gradually increasing the dose over the next 2 weeks, followed by a 10-day BUP taper during weeks 5-6, and ISR/placebo taper during weeks 7 to 8. Assessments included thrice-weekly measures of craving and withdrawal, as well as vital signs and urine drug screens. Medication compliance was assessed by monitoring number of missed clinic visit days.

Results:

Baseline characteristics of participants (n = 25; 60% male, 96% Caucasian, 48% employed, mean age 32.8 years) did not differ significantly between treatment groups (isradipine, n = 11; placebo, n = 14). During the stabilization phase (n = 19), ISR participants had significantly lower rates of illicit opioid-positive urines (treatment × visit: t = -2.16, P = 0.03), as well as reduction in craving intensity (t = –2.50, P = 0.01), frequency (t = –3.43, P < 0.01) and duration (t = –2.51, P = 0.01). ISR was well tolerated with mild adverse effects.

Conclusions:

This study was likely underpowered due to being a pilot trial. Although preliminary results suggest ISR may improve BUP-assisted treatment outcomes, concerns about high number of exclusions (n = 11 during taper phase) based on cardiovascular measures as well as ISR-induced changes in vital signs with the immediate release formulation may limit the feasibility of this approach.

Trial Registration:

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01895270. Registered 10 July 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01895270?id=NCT01895270&draw=2&rank=1

Anti-stress neuropharmacological mechanisms and targets for addiction treatment: A translational framework

Stress-related substance use is a major challenge for treating substance use disorders. This selective review focuses on emerging pharmacotherapies with potential for reducing stress-potentiated seeking and consumption of nicotine, alcohol, marijuana, cocaine, and opioids (i.e., key phenotypes for the most commonly abused substances). I evaluate neuropharmacological mechanisms in experimental models of drug-maintenance and relapse, which translate more readily to individuals presenting for treatment (who have initiated and progressed). An affective/motivational systems model (three dimensions: valence, arousal, control) is mapped onto a systems biology of addiction approach for addressing this problem. Based on quality of evidence to date, promising first-tier neurochemical receptor targets include: noradrenergic (α1 and β antagonist, α2 agonist), kappa-opioid antagonist, nociceptin antagonist, orexin-1 antagonist, and endocannabinoid modulation (e.g., cannabidiol, FAAH inhibition); second-tier candidates may include corticotropin releasing factor-1 antagonists, serotonergic agents (e.g., 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, 5-HT3 antagonists), glutamatergic agents (e.g., mGluR2/3 agonist/positive allosteric modulator, mGluR5 antagonist/negative allosteric modulator), GABA-promoters (e.g., pregabalin, tiagabine), vasopressin 1b antagonist, NK-1 antagonist, and PPAR-γ agonist (e.g., pioglitazone). To address affective/motivational mechanisms of stress-related substance use, it may be advisable to combine agents with actions at complementary targets for greater efficacy but systematic studies are lacking except for interactions with the noradrenergic system. I note clinically-relevant factors that could mediate/moderate the efficacy of anti-stress therapeutics and identify research gaps that should be pursued. Finally, progress in developing anti-stress medications will depend on use of reliable CNS biomarkers to validate exposure-response relationships.

Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Opioid Ligands: Progress and Future Directions

Opioid receptors (MOP-r, KOP-r, DOP-r, as well as NOP-r) and their endogenous neuropeptide agonist systems are involved in diverse neurobiological and behavioral functions, in health and disease. These functions include pain and analgesia, addictions, and psychiatric diseases (e.g., depression-, anxiety-like, and stress-related disorders). Drug discrimination assays have been used to characterize the behavioral pharmacology of ligands with affinity at MOP-r, KOP-r, or DOP-r (and to a lesser extent NOP-r). Therefore, drug discrimination studies with opioid ligands have an important continuing role in translational investigations of diseases that are affected by these neurobiological targets and their pharmacotherapy.

Effects of prototypic calcium channel blockers in methadone-maintained humans responding under a naloxone discrimination procedure

Accumulating evidence suggests that L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) attenuate the expression of opioid withdrawal and the dihydropyridine L-type CCB isradipine has been shown to block the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-maintained humans. This study determined whether two prototypic L-type CCBs with differing chemical structures, the benzothiazepine diltiazem and the phenylalkamine verapamil, attenuate the behavioral effects of naloxone in methadone-maintained humans trained to distinguish between low-dose naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.) and placebo under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure. Once discrimination was acquired, diltiazem (0, 30, 60, 120 mg) and verapamil (0, 30, 60, 120 mg), alone and combined with the training dose of naloxone, were tested. Diltiazem alone produced 33-50% naloxone- and novel-appropriate responding at 30 and 60 mg and essentially placebo-appropriate responding at 120 mg. Verapamil alone produced 20-40% naloxone- and 0% novel-appropriate responding. Diltiazem at 60 mg decreased several ratings associated with positive mood and increased VAS ratings of "Bad Drug Effects" relative to placebo, whereas verapamil increased ratings associated with euphoria. When administered with naloxone, diltiazem produced 94-100% naloxone-appropriate-responding with 6% novel-appropriate responding at 60 mg (n=3). When administered with naloxone, verapamil produced 60-80% naloxone- and 0% novel-appropriate responding (n=5). Diltiazem decreased diastolic blood pressure and heart rate whereas verapamil decreased ratings of arousal relative to placebo. These results suggest that CCBs with different chemical structures can be differentiated behaviorally, and that diltiazem and verapamil do not attenuate the discriminative stimulus effects of naloxone in humans at the doses tested.

Isradipine and dextromethorphan in methadone-maintained humans under a naloxone discrimination procedure

In seven methadone-maintained human participants trained to distinguish between a low dose of naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, i.m.; i.e., Drug A) and placebo (i.e., Drug B) under an instructed novel-response drug discrimination procedure, the calcium channel blocker isradipine (0-10 mg/70 kg, p.o.; N=7) and the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist dextromethorphan (0-60 mg/70 kg, p.o.; N=6) were tested each alone and in combination with the training dose of naloxone. Isradipine alone produced some naloxone- and novel-appropriate responding, minimal changes in self-reports and decreases in blood pressure. Dextromethorphan alone produced some novel-appropriate responding and minimal changes in self-reports and vital signs. When combined with naloxone, isradipine significantly attenuated naloxone-occasioned responding, without increasing novel-appropriate responding, and attenuated naloxone-induced increases in opioid receptor antagonist ratings and ratings measuring sedation. Dextromethorphan significantly attenuated naloxone-appropriate responding, increased novel-appropriate responding, and enhanced naloxone's effects on ratings of dysphoric effects. These results suggest that isradipine attenuates and dextromethorphan enhances some of the behavioral effects of naloxone in opioid-dependent humans.

D-cycloserine-Naloxone interactions in opioid-dependent humans under a novel-response naloxone discrimination procedure

Six participants currently in opioid maintenance treatment were trained to distinguish between naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg, intramuscularly [i.m.]) and placebo under an instructed novel-response drug-discrimination procedure. Doses of the partial glycine agonist D-cycloserine (0-500 mg/70 kg, per os [P.O.]) alone and combined with naloxone (0.15 mg/70 kg) were then tested. D-cycloserine alone produced minimal drug-appropriate responding, no significant changes in self-reported effects, and increases only in systolic blood pressure. When combined with the naloxone, D-cycloserine partially attenuated naloxone-appropriate responding. D-cycloserine attenuated naloxone-induced increases in visual analog scale ratings of "like naloxone" and scores on the Lysergic Acid Diethyl Amide subscale of the Addiction Research Center Inventory (D. R. Jasinski, 1977; W. R. Martin, J. W. Sloan, J. D. Sapiro, & D. R. Jasinski, 1971). Naloxone attenuated D-cycloserine-induced increases in systolic blood pressure. These results suggest that D-cycloserine at doses up to 500 mg/70 kg may have some limited usefulness in relieving symptoms of opioid withdrawal.