DPC4/Smad4: no mutations, rare allelic imbalances, and retained protein expression in pancreatic endocrine tumors

Hotspot DAXX, PTCH2 and CYFIP2 mutations in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Mutations in DAXX/ATRX, MEN1 and genes involved in the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) pathway have been implicated in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). However, mainly mutations present in the majority of tumor cells have been identified, while proliferation-driving mutations could be present only in small fractions of the tumor. This study aims to identify high- and low-abundance mutations in pNENs using ultra-deep targeted resequencing. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded matched tumor-normal tissue of 38 well-differentiated pNENs was sequenced using a HaloPlex targeted resequencing panel. Novel amplicon-based algorithms were used to identify both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion-deletions (indels) present in >10% of reads (high abundance) and in <10% of reads (low abundance). Found variants were validated by Sanger sequencing. Sequencing resulted in 416,711,794 reads with an average target base coverage of 2663 ± 1476. Across all samples, 32 high-abundance somatic, 3 germline and 30 low-abundance mutations were withheld after filtering and validation. Overall, 92% of high-abundance and 84% of low-abundance mutations were predicted to be protein damaging. Frequently, mutated genes were MEN1, DAXX, ATRX, TSC2, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK-ERK pathway-related genes. Additionally, recurrent alterations on the same genomic position, so-called hotspot mutations, were found in DAXX, PTCH2 and CYFIP2. This first ultra-deep sequencing study highlighted genetic intra-tumor heterogeneity in pNEN, by the presence of low-abundance mutations. The importance of the ATRX/DAXX pathway was confirmed by the first-ever pNEN-specific protein-damaging hotspot mutation in DAXX. In this study, both novel genes, including the pro-apoptotic CYFIP2 gene and hedgehog signaling PTCH2, and novel pathways, such as the MAPK-ERK pathway, were implicated in pNEN.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (Pan-NENs) are rare but clinically important lesions. Pan-NENs are known for and often categorized by their capacity to produce clinical syndromes mediated by the production of hormones. Despite sometimes presenting dramatically from excessive hormone production, not all Pan-NENs produce functional hormone, and they can pose diagnostic challenges to practicing pathologists. Distinguishing Pan-NENs from mimics can be crucial, because Pan-NENs carry different prognoses and have unique treatments available due to their specific biological properties. This article reviews the current categorization and features of Pan-NENs.

Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are relatively uncommon; comprising approximately 0.5% of all human cancers. Although they often exhibit relatively indolent clinical courses, GEP-NETs have the potential for lethal progression. Due to their scarcity and various technical challenges, GEP-NETs have been understudied. As a consequence, we have few diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers for these tumors. Early detection and surgical removal is currently the only reliable curative treatment for GEP-NET patients; many of whom, unfortunately, present with advanced disease. Here, we review the genetics and epigenetics of GEP-NETs. The last few years have witnessed unprecedented technological advances in these fields, and their application to GEP-NETS has already led to important new information on the molecular abnormalities underlying them. As outlined here, we expect that "omics" studies will provide us with new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, inform the development of improved pre-clinical models, and identify novel therapeutic targets for GEP-NET patients.

PAR-4 as a possible new target for pancreatic cancer therapy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a deadly disease that is intractable to currently available treatment regimens. Although well described in different tumors types, the importance of apoptosis inducer prostate apoptosis response-4 (Par-4) in PC has not been appreciated. PC is an oncogenic kras driven disease, which is known to downregulate Par-4. Therefore, this review highlights its significance and builds a strong case supporting the role of Par-4 as a possible therapeutic target in PC.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Literature-based evidence spanning the last 15 years on Par-4 and its significance in PC.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review provides comprehensive knowledge of the significance of Par-4 and its association with kras status in PC, along with the crosstalk with crucial resistance and survival molecules NF-kappaB and Bcl-2 that ultimately are responsible for the overall poor outcome of different therapeutic approaches in this disease.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Par-4 holds promise as a potential therapeutic target that can be induced by chemopreventive agents and small-molecule inhibitors either alone or in combination with standard chemotherapeutics leading to selective apoptosis in PC cells. It also acts as a chemosensitizer and therefore warrants further clinical investigations in this disease.

Molecular characteristics and predictors of survival in patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumors

To better understand the molecular pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET), we investigated the molecular and clinical characteristics of malignant poorly differentiated colorectal NET and compared these findings with sporadic CRC and well-differentiated benign and malignant fore-/midgut NET. Tumors were analyzed and correlated for microsatellite instability (MSI) and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). NET were scored for proliferation using Ki-67. A total of 34 malignant poorly differentiated colorectal NET, 38 well-differentiated benign and malignant fore-/midgut-NET and 150 sporadic colorectal cancers (CRC) with known MSI status were investigated. Among the sporadic CRC, CIMP was significantly correlated with MSI-high (MSI-H) (p < 0.001). Of the 34 colorectal NET, 0/1 of the MSI-H, 3/5 (60%) of the MSI-L and 13/19 (68%) of the MSS tumors were CIMP+ (p = 0.17). Of the fore-/midgut-NET, none was MSI-H. 20/34 (59%) colorectal NET vs. 11/38 (29%) fore-/midgut-NET were CIMP+ (p = 0.01). The Ki-67 index was significantly higher in poorly differentiated colorectal NET compared to the less malignant fore-/midgut-NET (p < 0.0001). Besides the location in the colon, Ki-67 predicted poor outcome in NET (p < 0.0001). CIMP status did not affect survival. In NET, p16 methylation predicted a poor outcome (p = 0.0004). We conclude that molecular pathogenesis in sporadic CRC and poorly differentiated colorectal NET is different despite some similarities. Main differences between malignant well-differentiated and poorly differentiated NET are the Ki-67 proliferation rate and differential methylation in tumor-associated genes. Predictors of a poor outcome in patients with NET are poor differentiation, a high Ki-67 index and p16 methylation.

Molecular profiles of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system are defined by their endocrine phenotype and share many histopathological and clinical features. However, the fact that the hormone production of tumors depends on their site of origin, that the tumors differ in their biology, and that the association with familial syndromes is nonrandom suggests heterogeneity. It is therefore conceivable that the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors also differ in their molecular profile. This review summarizes and discusses the available data in this field.

Molecular genetics of neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors can develop either sporadically or in association with familial syndromes such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) or von Hippel-Lindau (VHL). A variety of genetic approaches has been utilized to dissect the underlying molecular pathogenesis of these distinctive tumors, including genome-wide screens such as comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity and DNA microarray analysis as well as targeted investigations into specific tumor suppressor gene and oncogene candidates. The identification of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene that underlies the MEN1 syndrome has provided important new insights into tumor pathogenesis. In addition, a number of independent approaches has converged on a pivotal role for regulators of the cell cycle. However, our understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors remains far from complete. In this review we highlight some of the key approaches, findings and implications of these genetic studies.

The molecular genetics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

The pathobiology of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is hampered by the lack of scientific tools that define their mechanisms of secretion, proliferation, and metastasis; and, currently, there are no accurate means to assess tumor behavior and disease prognosis. Molecular biologic techniques and genetic analysis may facilitate the delineation of the molecular pathology of NETs and provide novel insights into their cellular mechanisms. The current status and recent advances in assessment of the molecular basis of tumorigenesis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) were reviewed (1981-2004). The objectives of this retrospective study were to provide a cohesive overview of the current state of knowledge and to develop a molecular understanding of these rare tumor entities to facilitate the establishment of therapeutic targets and rational management strategies. Multiple differences in chromosomal aberration patterns were noted between gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine and pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs). Divergence in gene expression patterns in the development of GI carcinoids and PETs was identified, whereas examination of the PET and GI carcinoid data demonstrated only few areas of overlap in the accumulation of genetic aberrations. These data suggest that the recent World Health Organization classification of GEP-NETs may require updating. In addition, previous assumptions of tumor similarity (pancreatic vs. GI) may be unfounded when they are examined at a molecular level. On the basis of the evolution of genetic information, enteric neuroendocrine lesions (carcinoids) and PETs may need to be classified as two distinct entities rather than grouped together as the single entity "GEP-NETs."

Chromosome 1q loss of heterozygosity frequently occurs in sporadic insulinomas and is associated with tumor malignancy

The pathogenesis of sporadic insulinomas is not clear, and there are no reliable genetic determinants that are useful to distinguish malignant and benign forms of this tumor. It was reported that 1q LOH might contribute to pathogenesis in gastrinomas and was correlated with tumor progression. However, little data are available on 1q LOH in sporadic insulinomas. In our study, we determine whether 1q LOH occurs in sporadic insulinomas and is associated with tumor malignancy by performing 1q allelotyping with 17 markers in 40 tumors and pair normal DNA. Thirty-five (88%) insulinomas had 1q LOH. Of the 35 insulinomas with 1q LOH, 14 (40%) had 1q21.3-23.2 LOH over a 7.5 cM region (SRO-1), whereas LOH in 21 tumors (60%) occurred at 1q31.3 over an 11.4 cM area (SRO-2). Of 24 tumors without MEN1 LOH, 20 had either SRO-1 or SRO-2 LOH (83%), whereas in 16 tumors with MEN1 LOH, 9 were shown to have LOH at either SRO-1 or SRO-2 (56%) (p = 0.065). This result suggests that LOH at 2 SRO might be MEN1 gene independent and may contribute to the pathogenesis in a subset of insulinomas without MEN1 gene LOH. The presence of 1q21.3-23.2 LOH is significantly associated with malignancy of insulinomas (p = 0.014). The high frequency of LOH at 1q 21.3-23.2 and 1q31.3 suggests these 2 areas may harbor putative tumor suppressor genes that may play an important role in the tumorigenesis of a subset of insulinomas. LOH at 1q21.3-23.2, which was associated with tumor malignancy, could be one of the genetic markers for identifying malignancy in sporadic insulinomas.

Smad4 protein expression correlates with grade, stage, and DNA ploidy in prostatic adenocarcinomas

The tumor suppressor gene Smad4 (DPC4) has been localized to chromosome 18q21.1 and is a member of the Smad family that mediates the transforming growth factor beta signaling pathway suppressing epithelial cell growth. However, variable expression of this protein has been reported, with a loss in some cancers and increased expression in others. Given both the variability and lack of consensus reported regarding Smad4 expression in prostate cancer, we assessed Smad4 immunoreactivity in prostatic adenocarcinomas (PACs). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 133 PACs were immunostained by a manual method using indirect biotin streptavidin horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine detection using a monoclonal mouse antihuman Smad4 antibody (sc-7966; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif). Nuclear immunoreactivity and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity were each semiquantitatively scored based on intensity and percentage of positive cells. Deoxyribonucelic acid ploidy was determined on Feulgen-stained tissue sections by static image analysis. Results were correlated with morphological and prognostic variables. Variable nuclear and cytoplasmic Smad4 positivity was noted in the adjacent benign glands in all cases. Of 133 PACs, 64 (48%) featured increased nuclear and 68 (51%) featured increased cytoplasmic protein expression. Nuclear Smad4 overexpression correlated with tumor grade (P = .02), stage (P = .04), and DNA ploidy (P = .04). Cytoplasmic overexpression correlated with tumor grade (P = .04) and DNA ploidy (P = .04) while showing a trend for correlation with tumor stage (P = .08). Neither nuclear nor cytoplasmic Smad4 overexpression correlated with postsurgical biochemical disease recurrence. Smad4 protein expression persists in PACs compared with benign glands, with both nuclear and cytoplasmic overexpression correlating with prognostic variables indicative of aggressive tumor behavior. Given the significant reported variability of Smad4 in several different cancers, further studies in prostate and other tumors are warranted to elucidate its role in tumorigenesis.

Historical, current and future perspectives on gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors

Gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors are neoplasms of which the pathogenesis is not completely understood and of which the clinical behavior is difficult to predict. Originally, Masson suggested that the cell of origin was an endocrine cell derived from the gastrointestinal epithelium. However, Pearse showed that the endocrine cells throughout the body shared various features, among others the amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) capacity, and postulated the neural crest as the common origin for all APUD cells, a hypothesis that received support from the scientific community for many years. Now, biologists start to elucidate the various transcription factors that drive gastrointestinal development, and it has become evident that Masson was presumably right. Transcription factors relevant for development may also operate during tumorigenesis, and their expression may determine tumor biology. With other genetic factors, they may play a role in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine tumors, and perhaps, their expression will turn out to be of prognostic or therapeutic value. In this review, current knowledge on the development of endocrine cells, hypotheses on the origin of endocrine tumors, genetic alterations, and prognostic factors are discussed. It is suggested that the increasing understanding of the normal development of gastrointestinal and pancreatic endocrine cells, the accumulating data on genetic alterations in endocrine tumors and the reappraisal of the hypotheses on their pathogenesis formulated in the past may help in elucidating their pathogenesis and in more accurately predicting prognosis.

Comparison of genetic alterations in neuroendocrine tumors: frequent loss of chromosome 18 in ileal carcinoid tumors

Carcinoid tumors and pancreatic endocrine tumors are uncommon neuroendocrine neoplasms, and their genetic alterations are not well characterized. These tumors have site-specific differences in neuroendocrine characteristics, clinical course and genetic alterations. We compared clinicopathological features and loss of heterozygosity of chromosomes 11q, 16q and 18, and BRAF gene mutations in 47 patients with neuroendocrine tumors including 16 with pancreatic endocrine tumors, 15 with nonileal carcinoid tumors and 16 with ileal carcinoid tumors. Patients with carcinoid tumors had more frequent history of alcohol consumption compared to patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors (P=0.02), and patients with ileal carcinoid tumors more frequently had liver metastasis compared to patients with nonileal carcinoid tumors and pancreatic endocrine tumors (P=0.02). Allelic loss of chromosome 11q was present in 21% of tumors, chromosome 16q in 13%, and chromosome 18 in 30%. These alterations differed with the anatomical subsite of tumor: allelic loss of chromosome 18 was present in 69% of ileal carcinoid tumors, 13% of nonileal carcinoid tumors and 6% of pancreatic endocrine tumors (P=0.001). In contrast to pancreatic endocrine tumors and nonileal carcinoid tumors, all 11 ileal tumors with loss of chromosome 18 had complete loss of both chromosomal arms. No BRAF mutations were identified. Complete allelic loss of chromosome 18 was associated with smaller tumor size (P=0.02). Our study indicates that genetic alterations vary by tumor subsite and clinicopathologic features, and ileal carcinoid tumors have distinctive clinicopathologic and genetic profiles.

Mutational analysis of PPARG as a candidate tumour suppressor gene in enteropancreatic endocrine tumours

OBJECTIVES

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or deletion of chromosome 3p is a frequent finding in enteropancreatic endocrine tumours (EPETs), suggesting the pathogenetic involvement of one or more tumour suppressor genes on 3p. PPARG, the gene encoding the gamma isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARgamma), is highly expressed in normal human pancreatic islet cells, is located at 3p25, and has been reported to sustain loss-of-function mutations in human colorectal carcinomas. Additionally, the development of islet cell hyperplasia in an islet cell-specific pparg knockout mouse has further emphasized the attractiveness of PPARG as a candidate gene important in the pathogenesis of EPETs. Therefore, we sought to examine PPARG for intragenic inactivating mutations, the evidence needed to rigorously establish it as a tumour suppressor in EPETs.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

Twenty-three EPETs from 20 patients were examined for coding region mutations in PPARG and for LOH on 3p at microsatellite markers flanking PPARG.

RESULTS

LOH on 3p was detected in tumours from six patients (30%), but no intragenic mutations were detected in PPARG, whether or not LOH was present.

CONCLUSION

These findings strongly suggest that PPARG does not commonly function as a classical tumour suppressor gene in the pathogenesis of EPETs.

Histological and immunohistochemical study of composite neuroendocrine-exocrine carcinomas of the stomach

Composite neuroendocrine-exocrine carcinomas (NEECs) with two distinct components of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma within the same tumor are rare but may have a clue for clarifying the pathogenesis of NE tumors arising from non-endocrine organs. This study was done to characterize histological and immunohistochemical features of NEECs of the stomach comparing with pure NE tumors of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Microscopically, adenocarcinoma components in 6 of 8 NEECs were well differentiated and located superficially, whereas NE components were poorly differentiated and located deeply. In the remaining two cases, smaller NE components were intermingled within adenocarcinoma components. Immunohistochemically, neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) was positive in 5 NE components, of which 3 cases were homogeneously positive, and 2 adenocarcinoma components of 8 NEECs, while 19 of 21 pure NE tumors of GI tract were homogeneously positive for NCAM. Ghrelin-immunoreactivity was found in 4 NE components and 2 adenocarcinoma components of NEECs, although 20 pure NE tumors were positive for ghrelin. Smad4 was positive in both components of 7 NEECs. These findings suggest that composite NEECs and pure NE tumors of GI tract may have different NE properties and that most NE components of composite NEECs of the stomach may originate from an adenocarcinoma precursor cell and occasional tumors from a pluripotent cell.