Measurement of liver function for patients with cirrhosis by 13C-methacetin breath test compared with Child-Pugh score and routine liver function tests:

Dynamic carbon 13 breath tests for the study of liver function and gastric emptying

In gastroenterological practice, breath tests (BTs) are diagnostic tools used for indirect, non-invasive assessment of several pathophysiological metabolic processes, by monitoring the appearance in breath of a metabolite of a specific substrate. Labelled substrates originally employed radioactive carbon 14 (¹⁴C) and, more recently, the stable carbon 13 isotope (¹³C) has been introduced to label specific substrates. The ingested ¹³C-substrate is metabolized, and exhaled ¹³CO₂ is measured by mass spectrometry or infrared spectroscopy. Some ¹³C-BTs evaluate specific (microsomal, cytosolic, and mitochondrial) hepatic metabolic pathways and can be employed in liver diseases (i.e. simple liver steatosis, non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, drug and alcohol effects).

Another field of clinical application for ¹³C-BTs is the assessment of gastric emptying kinetics in response to liquids (¹³C-acetate) or solids (¹³C-octanoic acid in egg yolk or in a pre-packed muffin or the ¹³C-Spirulina platensis given with a meal or a biscuit). Studies have shown that ¹³C-BTs, used for gastric emptying studies, yield results that are comparable to scintigraphy and can be useful in detecting either delayed- (gastroparesis) or accelerated gastric emptying or changes of gastric kinetics due to pharmacological effects. Thus, ¹³C-BTs represent an indirect, cost-effective and easy method of evaluating dynamic liver function and gastric kinetics in health and disease, and several other potential applications are being studied.

Comparison of two dosage regimens of the substrate for the [13C]methacetin breath test

The [(13)C]methacetin breath test ([(13)C]MBT)--a valuable non-invasive tool dedicated to the assessment of the liver metabolic capacity--still needs standardisation. The aim of this study was to check whether currently used dosage regimens of [(13)C]methacetin provide concordant [(13)C]MBT results in subjects with an atypical body constitution. Healthy volunteers: low body mass<55 kg (eight women), and high body mass>95 kg (eight large body frame men) were recruited. They underwent [(13)C]MBT on separate days, taking in random order [(13)C]methacetin: a fixed 75 mg dose (FX75), or a 1 mg kg(-1) body mass-adjusted dose (BMAD). Samples of expiratory air for (13)CO(2) measurement were collected over 3 h. The maximum momentary (13)C elimination in breath air occurred earlier and was higher following BMAD than with FX75 in the low body mass females (T (max) 14.6 ± 1.0 min vs. 22.1 ± 2.4 min, p = 0.019; D (max) 41.9 ± 2.9 % dose h(-1) vs. 36.6 ± 3.6 % dose h(-1), p = 0.071). In the high body mass men, T (max) remained unchanged, whereas D (max) was slightly higher with BMAD compared to FX75 (21.5 ± 3.2 min vs. 23.0 ± 3.0 min; 38.5 ± 2.9 % dose h(-1) vs. 32.3 ± 2.5 % dose h(-1)). It is concluded that in subjects with a body constitution outside the general population average, the dosage of the substrate may affect some results of the [(13)C]MBT. The dosage-related differences appear, however, to be insignificant if the result of the [(13)C]MBT is reported as a cumulative (13)C recovery in breath air.

Diagnostic value of the C methacetin breath test in various stages of chronic liver disease

The accuracy of the ¹³C-methacetin breath test (¹³C-MBT) in differentiating between various stages of liver disease is not clear. A cross-sectional study of Asian patients was conducted to examine the predictive value of the ¹³C-MBT in various stages of chronic liver diseases. Diagnostic accuracy of the breath test was determined by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve analysis. Seventy-seven patients (47 men/30 women, mean age 50 ± 16 years) were recruited. Forty-seven patients had liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh A = 11, Child Pugh B = 15, and Child Pugh C = 21), 21 had fibrosis, and 9 had chronic inflammation. The sensitivity and positive predictive value for liver fibrosis, cirrhosis (all stages), Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B, and Child-Pugh C were 65% and 56%, 89% and 89%, 67% and 42%, 40% and 40%, and 50% and 77%, respectively. Area under curve values for fibrosis was 0.62 (0.39–0.86), whilst that for cirrhosis (all stages) was 0.95 (0.91–0.99). The ¹³C-methacetin breath test has a poor predictive value for liver fibrosis but accurately determines advanced cirrhosis.

Review article: the assessment of liver function using breath tests

BACKGROUND

Hepatologists have long sought to develop a test for assessing liver function, but this aim has been stalled by the complexity of the liver and its diverse functions. Results of metabolic tests, including breath tests, correlate with clinical and histological parameters of patients with liver disorders; however, these tests tend to be cumbersome and impractical for everyday use. The recent development of a real-time, point-of-care liver function breath test has made it straightforward to assess the metabolic function of the liver.

AIM

To review the available data on the use of breath tests for assessing liver reserve in various conditions and their application in various clinical hepatology settings.

RESULTS

The (13)C-methacetin breath test enables accurate follow-up of patients with acute or chronic liver damage, where overall hepatic function is significantly suppressed by known causes of liver disorders, including acute, sub-acute or chronic conditions. The metabolic breath test can detect both gradual and spontaneous improvements in liver function and the effects of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Breath testing that provides continuous quantification of methacetin metabolism may be a sensitive tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with liver disorders.