Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic renal disease: technical aspects and clinical relevance

Impact of the kidney transplantation on renalase and blood pressure levels in renal transplant donors and recipients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Prevalence of hypertension increases as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines. Renalase metabolizes catecholamines and have an important role in blood pressure (BP) regulation. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of kidney transplantation on renalase levels and BP in kidney donors and recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty kidney transplant recipients and their donors were included in the study. Serum renalase levels and ambulatory BP values were measured in both donors and recipients before and after transplantation. Factor associated with change in renalase and BP levels were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In donors; mean GFR and hemoglobin levels decreased while night-time systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels and serum renalase levels increased simultaneously after nephrectomy. Day-time SBP and DBP levels did not changed and the night/day ratio of mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased significantly. In recipients, mean GFR increased, while mean serum renalase levels, creatinine and BP levels decreased after transplantation. Correlation analysis revealed that changes in MAP correlated with alteration in serum renalase levels and GFR.

CONCLUSIONS

After transplantation, serum renalase levels increased in donors and decreased in recipients. The renalase levels are associated with change in MAP and circadian rhythm of BP in donors and recipients.

Impact of the kidney transplantation on renalase and blood pressure levels in renal transplant donors and recipients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Prevalence of hypertension increases as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) declines. Renalase metabolizes catecholamines and have an important role in blood pressure (BP) regulation. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of kidney transplantation on renalase levels and BP in kidney donors and recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty kidney transplant recipients and their donors were included in the study. Serum renalase levels and ambulatory BP values were measured in both donors and recipients before and after transplantation. Factor associated with change in renalase and BP levels were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In donors; mean GFR and hemoglobin levels decreased while night-time systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels and serum renalase levels increased simultaneously after nephrectomy. Day-time SBP and DBP levels did not changed and the night/day ratio of mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased significantly. In recipients, mean GFR increased, while mean serum renalase levels, creatinine and BP levels decreased after transplantation. Correlation analysis revealed that changes in MAP correlated with alteration in serum renalase levels and GFR.

CONCLUSIONS

After transplantation, serum renalase levels increased in donors and decreased in recipients. The renalase levels are associated with change in MAP and circadian rhythm of BP in donors and recipients.

Nocturnal blood pressure is associated with sympathetic nerve activity in patients with chronic kidney disease

Elevated nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and nocturnal non-dipping are frequently observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and are stronger predictors of cardiovascular complications and CKD progression than standard office BP. The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is thought to modulate diurnal hemodynamic changes and the vascular endothelium plays a fundamental role in BP regulation. We hypothesized that SNS overactivity and endothelial dysfunction in CKD are linked to elevated nocturnal BP and non-dipping. In 32 CKD patients with hypertension (56 ± 7 years), office BP, 24-hr ambulatory BP, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD) were measured. Participants were subsequently divided into dippers (nighttime average BP > 10% lower than the daytime average BP, n = 8) and non-dippers (n = 24). Non-dippers had higher nighttime BP (p < .05), but not office and daytime BP, compared to dippers. MSNA burst incidence (81 ± 13 versus 67 ± 13 bursts/100 HR, p = .019) was higher and brachial artery FMD (1.7 ± 1.5 versus 4.7 ± 1.9%, p < .001) was lower in non-dippers compared to dippers. MSNA and FMD each predicted nighttime systolic (β = 0.48,-0.46, p = .02, 0.07, respectively) and diastolic BP (β = 0.38,-0.47, p = .04, 0.03, respectively) in multivariate-adjusted analyses. Our novel findings demonstrate that unfavorable nocturnal BP profiles are associated with elevated SNS activity and endothelial dysfunction in CKD. Specifically, CKD patients with higher nighttime BP and the non-dipping pattern have higher MSNA and lower FMD. These support our hypothesis that SNS overactivation and endothelial dysfunction are linked to the dysregulation of nighttime BP as well as the magnitude of BP lowering at nighttime in CKD.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Echocardiographic Findings in Renal Transplant Recipients

Hypertension is common in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is important in diagnosing hypertension and diurnal BP variation. The authors set out to compare office BP and ABPM measurements to determine diurnal pattern and to evaluate echocardiographic findings in RTRs. ABPM and office BP measurements were compared in 87 RTRs. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed for each patient. The correlations between office and 24-hour ABPM were 0.275 for mean systolic BP (P=.011) and 0.260 for mean diastolic BP (P=.017). Only 36.8% had concordant hypertension between office BP and ABPM, with a masked hypertension rate of 16.1% and white-coat effect rate of 24.1%. Circadian BP patterns showed a higher proportion of nondippers (67.8%). Left ventricular mass index was increased in 21.8% of all recipients. There was a significant but weak correlation between office BP and ABPM.

Home blood pressure measurements for managing hypertension in hemodialysis patients

Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring serves as a practical method to detect changes in BP instead of ambulatory BP monitoring in hemodialysis patients. To evaluate the relationship of reduction in home BP compared to interdialytic ambulatory BP measurements we analyzed the data from the dry-weight reduction in hypertensive hemodialysis patients (DRIP) trial in which 100 patients had their dry weight probed based on clinical sign and symptoms and 50 patients served as controls. We measured home BP 3 times a day for 1 week using a validated oscillometric monitor on 3 occasions at 4-week intervals after randomization. Changes from baseline in home, predialysis BP and postdialysis BP were compared to interdialytic 44-hour ambulatory BP. Home and ambulatory BP monitoring was available in 141 of 150 (94%) patients. Predialysis systolic BP was not as sensitive as ambulatory BP in detecting change in BP with dry-weight reduction. Whereas postdialysis BP was capable of detecting an improvement in systolic BP in response to probing dry weight, by itself it does not provide evidence that change in postdialysis BP persists over the interdialytic period. Home BP reliably detected changes in ambulatory BP, albeit with less sensitivity at 4 weeks. However, at 4 and at 8 weeks, changes in home systolic BP were most strongly related to changes in interdialytic ambulatory systolic BP compared to predialysis and postdialysis BP. The reproducibility of BP measurements followed the order home > ambulatory >> predialysis > postdialysis. These data provide support for the use of home BP monitoring for the management of hypertension in hemodialysis patients.

Causes and mechanisms of nondipping hypertension

Growing evidence indicates that nondippers have worsened cardiovascular outcomes than dippers. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with a lack of nocturnal BP fall (nondipping) have also been shown to be more closely associated with target organ damage and worsened cardiovascular outcome than in patients with essential hypertension with dipping pattern. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms potentially linking nondipping with cardiovascular disease are not fully understood. There are multiple possible underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms in the impaired BP decline during the night. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors including abnormal neurohormonal regulation, lack of physical activity, nutritional factors such as increased dietary sodium intake, and smoking of tobacco have been implicated for blunted circadian rhythm of BP. Certain diseases such as diabetes and chronic renal diseases also affect the circadian BP rhythm. Currently, the clinical importance of nondipping is known well; however, the relationship between certain disease states and nondipping has not been fully explained yet. This paper will attempt to address to clarify the underlying basis for nondipping and the specific associations with various disease states.

Age-related blood pressure patterns and blood pressure variability among hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease among hemodialysis patients, the relationship between age and blood pressure (BP) is not well understood. It was postulated that the relationship of BP to age differs among hemodialysis patients versus the general population and that there is significant variability in dialysis unit BP measurements.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

To explore this hypothesis, the patterns of systolic, diastolic, mean arterial, and pulse pressures in the general population using data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey participants (n = 9242) were compared with those in a cohort of hemodialysis patients (n = 9849).

RESULTS

In contrast to the increase in systolic BP with age in the general population, systolic BP was elevated in young hemodialysis patients and declined slightly among the elderly. The inverted "U"-shape relationship between age and diastolic BP in the general population was absent in hemodialysis patients. Diastolic BP was elevated among hemodialysis patients <50 yr of age and declined with advancing age. Mean arterial and pulse pressures were elevated among young hemodialysis patients and exhibited less age dependency than in the general population. Variability in BP within patients was similar to that between patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship of BP to age differed from that in the general population. The variability in dialysis unit BP measurements may limit their use in managing hypertension and predicting outcomes. Nevertheless, dialysis unit BP measurements are necessary to minimize acute complications during the dialysis procedure.

Blood pressure recordings within and outside the clinic and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure (BP) measured outside the clinic correlates better with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with essential hypertension. To assess the role of out-of-clinic BP recordings in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a prospective cohort study was conducted in 217 veterans with CKD.

METHODS

BP was measured outside the clinic at home and by 24-hour ambulatory recordings, and in the clinic by 'routine' and standardized methods. Patients were followed over a median of 3.4 years to assess the combined end-point of total mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke.

RESULTS

Average (+/-SD) home BP was 147.0 +/- 21.4/78.3 +/- 11.6 mm Hg, 24-hour ambulatory BP 133.5 +/- 16.6/73.1 +/- 11.1 mm Hg and in-clinic BPs were 155.2 +/- 25.6/84.7 +/- 14.2 mm Hg by the standardized method, and 144.5 +/- 24.2/75.4 +/- 14.7 mm Hg by the 'routine' method. A 1 SD increase in systolic BP increased the hazard ratio (HR) of the composite end-point by 1.16 (95% CI 0.89-1.50) for routine BP, 1.57 (95% CI 1.19-2.09) for standardized BP, 1.66 (95% CI 1.27-2.17) for home BP, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.84) for 24-hour ambulatory BP recording. The HR of the composite end-point was only significant for hypertension defined by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (HR 2.22 (95% CI 1.23-4.01)). Adjusted for the propensity scores, BP measured by the ambulatory technique was not an independent predictor of cardiovascular events. Non-dipping was associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but not when adjusted for other risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors that differentiate hypertension or non-dipping appear to confer a cardiovascular risk in CKD.

Hypertension in renal parenchymal disease: why is it so resistant to treatment?

The association between hypertension and chronic renal disease is well known. The pathogenesis of hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complex and multifactorial, which may explain why it is resistant to treatment. The traditional paradigm is that hypertension in CKD is due either to an excess of intravascular volume (volume dependent) or to excessive activation of the renin-angiotensin system in relation to the state of sodium/volume balance (renin-dependent hypertension). This review focuses on the importance of less established mechanisms, such as increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system, increased endothelin production, decreased availability of endothelium-derived vasodilators and structural changes of the arteries, renal ischemia, and sleep apnea.

Dynamics of the circadian blood pressure profiles after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Abnormalities of diurnal blood pressure (BP) rhythm ("nondipping") are well-described in dialysis patients, and have prognostic importance. It is controversial whether successful renal transplantation (RTx) improves diurnal BP rhythm. To date, no study has attempted to define and model the evolution of diurnal BP rhythm profiles from dialysis to engraftment, focusing on the immediate (4-6 weeks) and medium-term (>1 year) postengraftment periods.

METHODS

To test if kidney transplantation normalizes the BP profile, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in 20 living related transplants (age, 30.3+/-5.1 years; 11 males, on dialysis for 25.6 months) 1 month preRTx and repeated 1 month and >1 year (ABPM3) after successful RTx. Dipping was defined as a sleep-to-awake ratio>0.92 (for systolic BP) and >0.90 (for diastolic BP).

RESULTS

PreRTx only 15% patients were dippers. At 1 month postRTx (creatinine clearance, 65.8 ml/min), all patients were complete nondippers. However, after >1 year postRTx (creatinine clearance, 70.4 ml/min), 40% were now dippers. Most importantly, overall, 30% of the patients improved significantly their circadian rhythm (35.3% of the initial preRTx nondippers). Despite successful renal transplantation, 55% patients maintained unchanged their nondipping profile throughout all three ABPM recordings. The only determinants of "long-term" postRTx circadian rhythm are the contemporary level of the renal function and the baseline, dialysis dipping profile: SBP3 sleep-to-awake ratio is related with serum creatinine3 (r=0.58, P=0.001), creatinine clearance (r=-0.41, P=0.036) and SBP1 sleep-to-awake ratio (r=0.48, P=0.034); similarly DBP3 sleep-to-awake ratio is related with serum creatinine3 (r=0.63, P=0.001), creatinine clearance (r=-0.471, P=0.036) and SBP1 sleep-to-awake ratio (r=0.53, P=0.016). In all, 57% of the variance in dipping status can be attributed and explained by the contribution of renal function and initial circadian variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the nondipper dialysis patients maintain a permanently abnormal circadian rhythm, despite successful RTx. In the short term, RTx is associated with a highly abnormal diurnal profile, exclusively related to ciclosporin dose and levels. However, in the longer term, renal transplantation leads to a significant improvement of the circadian blood pressure profile, influenced by the renal function level and by the pretransplantation dipping profile.

Recent insights from studies using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with renal disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To identify and evaluate recent (2000-2003) published studies employing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with chronic renal failure, on dialysis, and after renal transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss several studies that have employed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to refine the analysis of the link between blood pressure levels, and diurnal alterations, and end-organ damage or patient survival. There is now some evidence that an abnormal diurnal blood pressure profile, although intrinsically not a very reproducible label, has predictive value for patient survival, and that the non-dipping phenomenon is linked to a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and autonomic dysfunction.

SUMMARY

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring remains an important adjunct to the comprehensive cardiovascular evaluation of patients with chronic, end-stage renal failure or after renal transplantation.

Hypertension in dialysis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension is highly prevalent in dialysis patients and may be important to the high cardiovascular mortality of this population. This review shows the current direction in dialysis-associated hypertension management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Decreasing dialysate sodium concentration based on pre-hemodialysis plasma sodium concentration may have an additive effect in controlling hypertension. Sympathetic nervous system overactivity is an important feature of end-stage renal disease; a new amine oxidase, renalase, may be relevant to the pathogenesis of hypertension in this population. Similarly, drugs that block the sympathetic nervous system are uniformly protective in dialysis patients. Daily dialysis (short or long) results in better blood pressure control, and the mechanisms resulting in this effect are increasingly better understood.

SUMMARY

Long-term control of hypertension is necessary in dialysis patients. The better understanding of the dialysis-associated hypertension pathogenesis has impact on the dialysis prescription and antihypertensive drug choices.

The use of peridialysis blood pressure and intradialytic blood pressure changes in the prediction of interdialytic blood pressure in haemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVE

It is uncertain which blood pressure values (pre- or post-haemodialysis) best represent the average daily blood pressure in haemodialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to verify the power of peridialysis blood pressure to predict interdialytic blood pressure, and to ascertain the influence of blood pressure fluctuations during dialysis on this predictive ability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during the interdialytic period on 60 stable haemodialysis patients (mean age 53 +/- 16 years, 33 male) between two mid-week haemodialysis sessions. Pre- and post-haemodialysis blood pressures were 154/82 and 142/77 mmHg, respectively, and 44-h interdialytic blood pressure was 136/77 mmHg. Overall, post-haemodialysis blood pressure values correlated with interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure marginally better than did pre-haemodialysis values (r = 0.52 versus 0.61 for pre- and post-dialysis systolic pressure, respectively; r = 0.67 versus 0.72 for pre- and post-dialysis diastolic pressure, respectively). The average of the pre- and post-haemodialysis values showed a slightly better correlation with interdialytic blood pressure (r = 0.65 and 0.75 for systolic and diastolic pressure, respectively). When we stratified patients according to systolic blood pressure behaviour during dialysis, pre-dialysis blood pressure was the stronger predictor of interdialytic blood pressure in the quartile with greatest intradialytic blood pressure fall (r = 0.67 versus 0.44 for pre- and post-dialysis systolic blood pressure, respectively), whereas post-dialysis values were substantially better in the group with a rise in systolic pressure during dialysis (r = 0.26 versus 0.59 for pre- and post-dialysis systolic blood pressure, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that peridialysis blood pressure values are of limited accuracy in predicting interdialytic blood pressure, post-dialysis values are minimally better predictors than pre-dialysis blood pressures, and the average of pre- and post-haemodialysis values is marginally better than both. In addition, blood pressure fluctuations during dialysis have a sizable impact on this predictive ability. Clinical decisions related to blood pressure management and research design in haemodialysis hypertension should take these factors into account.

Blood pressure measurement in dialysis patients

The best method and timing of blood pressure (BP) measurement in end-stage renal disease are subject to controversy. This issue is especially relevant in hemodialysis patients, where unique causes of inaccuracy may exist. The lack of standardization of BP measurement in the dialysis unit may lead to misdiagnosis, so close attention must be paid to technical methods to obtain BP. A composite of BP measurements over a period of 1 to 2 weeks rather than isolated readings should be used for guidance. Interdialytic BP monitoring with an ambulatory BP monitor is the most reproducible method and is thought to best represent BP in dialysis patients. If available, ambulatory BP is a useful tool to evaluate the quality of BP control in the interdialytic period. Alternative forms of BP measurement, such as home BP, 20-minute postdialysis BP, and short (3-hour to 4-hour) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), could prove useful when feasible or available. In this paper, we discuss the evidence regarding BP measurement in dialysis patients, new techniques under development, and recommendations for clinical practice.

Insights from ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: diagnosis of hypertension and diurnal blood pressure in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of hypertension is essential in chronic kidney disease patients, as it is linked to increased left ventricular mass, stroke, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, and progression to end-stage renal disease. Elevated blood pressure (BP) detected by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) has been shown to be predictive of worse outcome in chronic kidney disease patients. Another predictor of worse outcome is diurnal BP variation, measured also by ABPM. In this study, the authors examined the relationship (concordance or discordance) between blood pressure measured by ABPM compared with daytime office BP, and also explored the predictors of diurnal variation in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

All the patients who underwent renal transplantation and follow-up at the authors' institution from January 1998 to January 2003 were involved in this study (n=177) in addition to another randomly selected 64 patients that underwent transplantation before 1998. All patients had their ABPM performed according to previously described protocols at least 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital, dialysis-independent and with a functioning renal allograft.

RESULTS

The authors found a positive correlation between systolic BP (SBP) diurnal variation and age (r =0.263, P <0.0001), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (r =-0.229, P <0.0001), cyclosporine trough (r =0.171, P =0.047), and ABPM-to-transplant interval (r =-0.133, P =0.039). After fitting a regression model, the authors found that only GFR (P <0.0001) and age (P =0.001) were independent predictors of SBP diurnal variation (r =0.357). Concordance rate between casual BP and ABPM was 80%, and by using casual BP, only 15% of hypertensive renal transplant patients would be erroneously diagnosed as normotensive.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that SBP diurnal variation is predicted independently by age and GFR, although it does correlate with cyclosporine trough and ABPM-to-transplant interval. In addition, the authors showed that ABPM is a more sensitive method for diagnosing hypertension than is sole reliance on office BP in renal transplant recipients.

Systolic blood pressure diurnal variation is not a predictor of renal target organ damage in kidney transplant recipients

Elevated blood pressure and diurnal blood pressure variation detected by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has been shown to be predictive of worse outcome in end-stage renal disease patients in small studies. What has been lacking is a large study to determine whether these ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)-derived variables are predictors of worse outcome in renal transplant recipients. All the patients that underwent renal transplantation and follow up at this institution from January 1998 till October 2002 were involved in this study (n=177). All patients were followed up for at least 48 weeks. Last creatinine correlated positively with duration of dialysis (p=0.035, r=0.158), kidney-donor age (p<0.0001, r=0.377), early kidney function (p<0.0001, r=0.610, r=0.683), 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) load (p=0.002, r=0.228), and ABPM-derived pulse pressure (p<0.0001, r=0.269). However neither office blood pressure nor SBP diurnal variation were predictors of kidney outcome. Regression analysis showed that early kidney function was the only independent predictor of transplant outcome (p<0.0001). Systolic blood pressure diurnal variation, though an important predictor of target organ damage in chronic kidney disease patients, was not a predictor of renal transplant function in renal transplant recipients. Only early kidney function was an independent predictor of later serum creatinine.