Inflammatory bowel disease and liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

Refractory Cytomegalovirus Colitis Followed by De Novo Inflammatory Bowel Disease Post-Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are both immune-mediated complications that affect orthotopic liver transplantation patients. In this report, we present a 60-year-old man who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis with serologies notable for CMV-seropositive donor and seronegative recipient. His post-transplant course was initially complicated by probable refractory CMV colitis. However, his gastrointestinal symptoms persisted, eventually leading to a diagnosis of post-transplant de novo IBD. The discussion highlights theories regarding the association between CMV and IBD, a topic that has been widely debated for decades.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Affect the Phenotype and Disease Course of Coexisting Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) affect the phenotype and severity of co-occurring immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). We aimed to investigate the characteristics of IMIDs in relation to co-occurring IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of Medline and EMBASE databases from inception to September 2020. We identified studies reporting the phenotype, severity, or disease course of IMIDs among patients with or without co-occurring IBD. A meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

RESULTS

The electronic search yielded 13 220 studies that we narrowed down to 73 eligible studies for full-text review, including 42 on primary sclerosing cholangitis, 12 on axial spondyloarthropathies, and 8 studies on psoriasis. In primary sclerosing cholangitis, IBD was associated with less frequent involvement of extrahepatic bile ducts (risk ratio [RR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.75), longer liver transplantation-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82), and no increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.31). Patients with axial spondyloarthropathies and co-occurring IBD were characterized by an increased risk of dactylitis (RR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.24-3.42), a lower Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (mean difference [MD] = -2.28; 95% CI, -3.26 to -1.30), and better Schober's test results (MD = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.49). Psoriasis and co-occurring IBD was associated with reduced disease severity (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.02-1.96) and less frequent presentation in nails (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.42), with no apparent impact on psoriatic arthritis (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.27-3.31).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review with meta-analysis found IBD is associated with a distinct disease phenotype among the IMIDs investigated. Our findings emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to patients with co-occurring IMIDs and IBD.

Alterations in the Course of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Following Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to systematically review and pool data regarding the alterations in the clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) following liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Relevant prospective and retrospective observational studies were identified by searching databases and gray literature through December 2020. Random-effects models were used to calculate the pooled frequency of IBD patients with disease course alterations ("improved," "unchanged," or "aggravated") after LT and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes in 2 or 3 categories. In the analysis of studies with 3-category outcomes (n = 13), the pooled frequencies of patients with improved, unchanged, or aggravated IBD course after LT were 29.4% (95% CI, 16.9% to 41.9%), 51.4% (95% CI, 45.5% to 57.3%), and 25.2% (95% CI, 15.6% to 34.8%), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), younger age at LT, or shorter duration of follow-up were more likely to have an improved disease course. Moreover, higher IBD exacerbation estimates were observed in studies with a low risk of bias. In the analysis of studies with 2-category outcomes (n = 12), the pooled frequencies of patients with improved/unchanged or aggravated IBD course were 73.6% (95% CI, 62.2% to 85.0%) and 24.1% (95% CI, 15.1% to 33.2%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of an exacerbated IBD course following LT was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.16-0.29; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that IBD activity remains unchanged (or improved/unchanged) in most IBD patients following LT. Furthermore, IBD type, age, and follow-up length can influence the IBD course after LT.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Review of the Phenotype and Associated Specific Features

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive cholestatic disease that is associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in approximately 70% of cases. Although the pathogenesis is still unknown for both diseases, there is increasing evidence to indicate that they share a common underlying predisposition. Herein, we review the epidemiology, diagnosis, disease pathogenesis, and specific clinical features of the PSC-IBD phenotype. Patients with PSC-IBD have a distinct IBD phenotype with an increased incidence of pancolitis, backwash ileitis, and rectal sparing. Despite often having extensive colonic involvement, these patients present with mild intestinal symptoms or are even asymptomatic, which can delay the diagnosis of IBD. Although the IBD phenotype has been well characterized in PSC patients, the natural history and disease behavior of PSC in PSC-IBD patients is less well defined. There is conflicting evidence regarding the course of IBD in PSC-IBD patients who receive liver transplantation and their risk of recurrent PSC. IBD may also be associated with an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma in PSC patients. Overall, the PSC-IBD population has an increased risk of developing colorectal neoplasia compared to the conventional IBD population. Lifelong annual surveillance colonoscopy is currently recommended.

Clinical Course of Ulcerative Colitis After Liver Transplantation in Patients with Concomitant Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

The natural history of ulcerative colitis (UC) after liver transplantation (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) remains ill defined. This study aimed to evaluate the course of UC after LT for PSC.

METHODS

The course of UC, including the clinical colitis severity index, was evaluated in patients with concomitant PSC and UC who received LT for PSC-induced end-stage liver disease. A total of 167 (55.4%) patients with PSC had concurrent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Of 159 cases of IBD that started before LT, 152 (95.5%) had UC and 7 (4.5%) had Crohn's disease.

RESULTS

The mean duration of patient follow-up after LT was 47.7 ± 33.5 months. The simple clinical colitis activity index scores after LT showed no change in 15.8% of patients, decreased in 78.3%, and increased in 5.9%. Seventy-one (46.7%) patients required no change in their specific UC treatment after LT, whereas 12 (7.9%) had to use more aggressive treatments after LT. In 69 (45.4%) patients, treatment could be tapered although not discontinued. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the duration of LT (odds ratio = 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.05, P = 0.03) was significantly associated with aggravation in the clinical course of UC after LT. Posttransplant cyclosporine exposure (odds ratio = 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.015-0.79, P = 0.028) and pretransplant body weight (odds ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.93, P = 0.003) demonstrated a protective effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the clinical course of UC remains unchanged or even improves in the majority of patients after LT, some may experience an aggressive course. The type of immunosuppression after transplantation can affect UC activity after LT. Cyclosporine may have some protective effects post-LT.

Risk of colorectal cancer in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in various chronic liver diseases compared with the general population remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases before and after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases. The primary outcome was the pooled risk of CRC among studies that reported the risk as standardized incidence rate (SIR).

RESULTS

Fifty studies that included 55,991 patients were identified. Among studies that included hepatitis and cirrhotic patients, the pooled SIR was 2.06 (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-2.90) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 49.2%), which appeared to be because of the difference between subgroup of diseases and the power of studies. Three studies reported an increased risk of CRC in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients (pooled SIR 6.70; P < .0001; 95% CI, 3.48-12.91) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36.3%), which appeared to be because of the difference between the power of studies. Among studies that included post-transplant patients, the pooled SIR was 2.16 (P < .0001; 95% CI, 1.59-2.94) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 56.4%). Meta-regression showed a correlation between the proportion of autoimmune-related liver diseases and the risk of CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chronic liver diseases had an increased risk of CRC compared with the general population, which persisted after liver transplantation. A more intensive surveillance for CRC is warranted in this population.

Solid Organ Transplantation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD): Analysis of Transplantation Outcome and IBD Activity in a Large Single Center Cohort

Background

Currently, limited data of the outcome of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are available. We aimed to analyze effects of SOT on the IBD course in a large IBD patient cohort.

Methods

Clinical data from 1537 IBD patients were analyzed for patients who underwent SOT (n = 31) between July 2002 and May 2014. Sub-analyses included SOT outcome parameters, IBD activity before and after SOT, and efficacy of IBD treatment.

Results

4.74% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 0.84% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) underwent SOT (p = 2.69 x 10⁻⁶, UC vs. CD). 77.4% of patients with SOT underwent liver transplantation (LTx) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy after SOT. All LTx were due to primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) or PSC overlap syndromes. Six patients (19.4%) required renal transplantation and one patient (3.2%) heart transplantation. A survival rate of 83.9% after a median follow-up period of 103 months was observed. Before SOT, 65.0% of patients were in clinical remission and 5 patients received immunosuppressive therapy (16.1%). After SOT, 61.0% of patients were in remission (p = 1.00 vs. before SOT) and 29.0% required IBD-specific immunosuppressive or anti-TNF therapy (p = 0.54 vs. before SOT). 42.9% of patients with worsening of IBD after SOT were at higher risk of needing steroid therapy for increased IBD activity (p = 0.03; relative risk (RR): 10.29; 95% CI 1.26–84.06). Four patients (13.0%) needed anti-TNF therapy after SOT (response rate 75%).

Conclusions

SOT was more common in UC patients due to the higher prevalence of PSC-related liver cirrhosis in UC. Despite mainly tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens, outcome of SOT and IBD was excellent in this cohort. In this SOT cohort, concomitant immunosuppressive therapy due to IBD was well tolerated.

De novo Crohn's disease following orthotopic liver transplantation: a case report and literature review

The development of de novo Crohn's disease (CD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is rare, possibly due to the continuous use of immunosuppressive treatment. Although several cases of CD following OLT have been reported worldwide, there are currently so such cases in Japan. We herein report the case of a patient who newly developed CD after undergoing OLT for congenital biliary atresia. The patient subsequently underwent ileocecal resection and has since maintained clinical remission. This is the first report of this condition in Japan. We also review the literature concerning cases of de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) developing after OLT, and discuss the causes of and role of immunosuppressive agents in treating IBD.

Gastrointestinal pathology in transplant patients

The assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) specimens from transplant patients is complicated by the wide range of potentially rare pathologies that may be found in this clinical setting. Acute GI graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is characterized by epithelial cell apoptosis, although there is increasing recognition that acute and/or chronic inflammation may also be present. By contrast, thus far there are no histological features known to be specific to chronic GI GvHD. Mycophenolate mofetil colitis may mimic both GvHD and inflammatory bowel disease, whereas both cytomegalovirus (CMV) and adenovirus infections can cause gland apoptosis. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder should be considered if a Crohn's-like histological picture is seen, and granulomas in biopsies from umbilical cord blood recipients should raise a suspicion of cord colitis syndrome. Finally, the GI tract may be involved directly or indirectly by the disease that originally required haematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation.

Management of ulcerative colitis pre- and post-liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis: two case reports and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Management of ulcerative colitis (UC) pre- and post-liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) can be challenging and complex. There are no formal guidelines, but there is a plethora of data regarding the use of medical and surgical treatment options, mainly from case series, retrospective data, and experience from transplant centers.

DISCUSSION

We present two cases of UC-PSC with variable severity of liver disease and discuss the available data on the management of UC pre- and post-liver transplant. A PubMed search was conducted using various keyword combinations looking for studies involving patients with UC-PSC pre- and post-liver transplant. We reviewed and summarized the available literature on the course of UC in patients with PSC-related cirrhosis pre- and post-transplant and risk of colorectal neoplasia post-transplant. Finally, we summarize the available data on the medical and surgical management of UC pre- and post-liver transplant and the effect of transplant on pouchitis. Current literature supports the use of medical therapies, including immunomodulators and biologic agents, following liver transplant. There is also literature supporting surgical management including total colectomy. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach is important when managing UC pre- and post-liver transplantation.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis as an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer in the context of inflammatory bowel disease: A review of the literature

To examine and evaluate recent evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) development in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients. Using the PubMed database, a literature search was conducted for relevant articles in English from the past 10 years. Relevant studies investigating PSC as a risk factor for CRC in IBD in the context of incidence and prevalence, pathogenesis, prevention and prognosis were included in this review. Recent evidence increasingly points to PSC as a significant risk factor in the development of CRC in patients with concomitant IBD. PSC may be an important risk factor for CRC in different populations worldwide. The mechanism for this increase in risk is still unclear. The efficacy of UDCA as a chemopreventive agent remains controversial. Liver transplantation does not halt the development of CRC, although there is not enough evidence to suggest that it is associated with increased incidence of CRC. While routine colonoscopic surveillance should be performed in patients with concurrent PSC and IBD, more high-level evidence is required to support the benefits of the procedure. While many new developments have taken place in the last decade, the pathogenesis and optimal management of CRC development in IBD-PSC patients remain unclear.

Incidence of colorectal cancer after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We estimated the pooled incidence of CRC after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with PSC as well as in a subset of patients with associated IBD (PSC-IBD). Through a systematic review of major bibliographic databases up to April 1, 2013, we identified cohort studies reporting the incidence of de novo CRC after LT for PSC. The main outcome measure was CRC incidence rate (IR) per 1000 person-years after LT in all patients with PSC and in a subset of patients with PSC-IBD with an intact colon. According to a meta-analysis of 18 independent cohorts (69 cases of CRC among 1987 patients), the pooled IR of de novo CRC in patients with PSC after LT was 5.8 per 1000 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.8-7.8]. According to a meta-analysis of 16 independent cohort studies (66 cases of CRC among 1017 patients), the IR of CRC in patients with PSC-IBD and an intact colon at the time of LT was 13.5 per 1000 person-years (95% CI = 8.7-18.2). A long duration of IBD and extensive colitis were identified as risk factors for CRC. Specific transplant-related factors that can increase the risk of CRC have not been identified. In conclusion, the risk of CRC remains high for patients who undergo LT for PSC, particularly in the subset of patients with associated IBD and an intact colon at the time of LT. Aggressive colonoscopic surveillance for CRC would be prudent for patients with PSC-IBD even after LT.

Inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

The course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after liver transplantation (LT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is complex, with several IBD-, PSC-, and transplant-related factors interplaying with each other. Approximately one-third of patients with known IBD improve, and one-third paradoxically worsen, after LT for PSC. Active IBD, discontinuation of 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) at time of LT and tacrolimus-based immunosuppression may be associated with an unfavorable course of IBD after LT. Approximately 14-30% patients with PSC may develop de novo IBD 10 years after LT. LT confers a high risk of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, although it may not be higher than baseline rates for PSC patients. The risk of colorectal cancer continues to be high after LT for PSC, and is higher in this cohort of patients with PSC-IBD, compared with patients undergoing LT for other indications. IBD does not adversely affect patient survival after LT, although the risk of recurrent PSC in the allograft may be higher in patients with IBD and an intact colon at time of LT. Standard therapy with 5-ASA and/or azathioprine may be appropriate for treatment of active IBD after LT and maintenance of remission. Anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents are effective, but should be used with caution because of high risk of adverse events. The management of IBD after LT requires close coordination between transplant hepatologists and IBD experts.

De novo inflammatory bowel disease and its mimics after organ transplantation

Diarrhea is a common symptom after solid organ transplantation or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, with a reported prevalence up to 72%. One of the uncommon causes for diarrhea in the posttransplant setting is development of de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The incidence of posttransplantation de novo IBD was shown to be higher than that in the general population (206 versus 20 per 100,000 cases annually). The frequency seems to be much higher following orthotopic liver transplantation than the transplantation of other solid organs. De novo IBD has also been described in the setting of bone marrow transplantation though not as commonly as after SOT. While IBD is considered an immune-mediated disorder and responds favorably to immunosuppressive, de novo IBD or IBD-like conditions can occur in the posttransplant period despite antirejection immunosuppressive therapy. Damage or pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules and their associated ongoing inflammation within the transplanted organ and the recipients' intestine have been implicated as possible etiologies. Various viral, bacterial, and protozoal infections can mimic IBD in postorgan transplantation. Common IBD mimickers in the postbone marrow transplant setting are graft-versus-host disease, infectious enteritis/colitis, and less commonly "cord colitis" that is described in detail below. In this article, we discuss the epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of de novo IBD after transplantation and highlight their differences in presentation, diagnosis, and management.

Immunosuppression after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis influences activity of inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Previous studies have shown conflicting results regarding the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We studied the progression of IBD in patients with PSC who have undergone liver transplantation. We also studied risk factors, including medical therapy, that could influence on IBD disease activity.

METHODS

In a longitudinal multicenter study, we analyzed data from the Nordic Liver Transplant Group on 439 patients with PSC who underwent liver transplantation from November 1984 through December 2006; 353 had IBD at the time of transplantation. We compared IBD activity before and after liver transplantation. Two hundred eighteen patients who had an intact colon and had undergone pretransplant and post-transplant colonoscopies were characterized further.

RESULTS

Macroscopic colonic inflammation was more frequent after liver transplantation than before liver transplantation (153 vs 124 patients; P < .001). The degree of inflammation decreased in 37 patients (17%), was unchanged in 93 patients (43%), and increased in 88 patients (40%) (P < .001). The rate of relapse after transplantation was higher than that before transplantation (P < .001), and overall clinical IBD activity also increased (P < .001). Young age at diagnosis of IBD and dual treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were significant risk factors for increased IBD activity after transplantation, whereas combination treatment with cyclosporin A and azathioprine had protective effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression affects IBD activity after liver transplantation in patients with PSC; a shift from present standard maintenance treatment of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin A and azathioprine should be considered for these patients.

The impact of inflammatory bowel disease post-liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

An association between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well recognized. However, the disease course of IBD following liver transplantation (LT) for PSC remains ill-defined.

AIMS AND METHODS

We aimed to assess the impact of IBD in patients that had undergone LT for PSC to help identify risk factors for flare and to assess the impact of IBD on graft survival.

RESULTS

110 patients underwent LT for PSC (Oct 1990-Aug 2009) at King's College Hospital. 74 (67%) patients had concurrent IBD and 36 had PSC alone prior to transplant. 39 patients developed IBD (flare of IBD and de-novo) post transplant. Cumulative risk for IBD at 1-, 2-, 5- and 10-years was 16%, 24%, 38% and 72% respectively. Flare of IBD occurred in 33 patients with a mean time to flare of 30 ± 28 months. De-novo IBD occurred in 6 patients (all UC). Mean time to diagnosis was 29 ± 25 months. Multivariate cox-regression analysis identified active IBD at time of LT as a significant predictor of graft failure post LT (HR 10, CI 3-39, P = 0.001) and smoking at time of transplantation and subsequent cessation predictive of recurrent IBD post transplantation (HR 17, 2-180, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, smoking at time of LT was predictive of flare of IBD and active IBD at time of transplantation had a significant effect on graft survival. Medical therapy needs to be maximised in the pre-LT period. Patients with poorly controlled IBD refractory to medical therapy should be considered for colectomy at time of transplantation.

The effects of liver transplantation on the clinical course of colitis in ulcerative colitis patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

The course of ulcerative colitis (UC) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unclear.

AIM

To investigate the clinical course of UC, before and after OLT for PSC.

METHODS

From a historical cohort of 86 patients with PSC-UC who underwent OLT, 77 patients who were followed up at our institution both before and after OLT from 1985 to 2011 were included.

RESULTS

Ulcerative colitis was diagnosed in 77 (97.5%) patients before OLT. Nineteen of 77 (24.7%) patients underwent colectomy before OLT. In the other 58 patients, the course of UC after OLT when compared to the last 5 years before OLT was quiescent in 48 patients (82.8%) while 9/58 (15.5%) of patients underwent colectomy post-OLT. There was a total of 97 colitis flares over a total of 621 years of follow-up from PSC/UC diagnosis to OLT (0.156 flares per patient year) whereas post-OLT, there were 31 flares over a total of 511 years of post-OLT follow-up (0.061 flares per patient year) (P < 0.001). On univariable analysis, the number of UC flares [Odds ratio (OR) 1.52; 95% Confidence interval (1.02-2.27), P = 0.04] and dysplasia [OR 47.00; 95% CI (6.48-340.66), P < 0.001] increased the risk of colectomy following OLT; the use of corticosteroids [OR 0.07; 95% CI (0.01-0.63), P = 0.008] and 5-aminosalicylate [OR 0.18; 95% CI (0.04-0.83), P = 0.04] was protective.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcerative colitis in the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis remains quiescent, and may improve in most patients after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Review article: colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease strongly associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD patients diagnosed with PSC have an increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and cancer.

AIMS

To review the available evidence regarding colorectal neoplasia epidemiology, preventive strategies and outcomes in patients with PSC and IBD, and to advance some hypotheses regarding possible mechanisms involved in cancer pathogenesis in these patients.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for the English language publications with predetermined search criteria. Reference lists from studies selected were manually searched to identify further relevant reports. Relevant manuscripts considering colorectal neoplasia in patients with PSC-IBD were selected.

RESULTS

Primary sclerosing cholangitis increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis; fewer data are available for Crohn's disease. PSC-IBD patients tend to be younger at diagnosis of IBD and at diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer in PSC-IBD patients predominates in the right colon. The increased risk of neoplasia is maintained after liver transplant and proctocolectomy. The role of ursodeoxycholic acid as a chemopreventive agent is controversial. The mechanisms underlying increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in these patients remain unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

A more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms involved in colorectal neoplasia development in PSC-IBD patients is needed. Until then, early cancer detection through enrolment in surveillance programmes is the only available strategy to decrease cancer risk.

Liver transplantation in PBC and PSC: indications and disease recurrence

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represent major indications for liver transplantation (LT). Despite the steady increase in the incidence and prevalence of PBC, the number of liver transplants for PBC has fallen in recent years, whereas the number of transplants for PSC has remained stable. Indications for LT for PBC and PSC are no different from those of other causes of chronic liver disease, apart from some disease-specific indications. PBC and PSC have more favourable outcomes after LT, compared to viral hepatitis and alcohol-associated liver disease. Numerous studies have clearly demonstrated that PBC and PSC recur after LT. The diagnosis of recurrent disease should be made on agreed criteria. The impact of recurrent disease on survival is unclear. Study of recurrent PBC and PSC may provide a better understanding of the mechanisms of these diseases in the native liver.

The natural history of inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation--a single-centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe the natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) after liver transplant, the predictors of PSC and IBD recurrence, and the interaction of these disease processes.

METHODS

Data regarding patients who received liver transplants for PSC at the University of Alberta Hospital (Edmonton, Alberta) from 1989 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Recurrent PSC (rPSC) was defined by the Mayo Clinic criteria. Cox proportional hazards modelling and Kaplan-Meier statistics were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 68 months. A total of 71.2% of patients were diagnosed with IBD pretransplant. Clinical IBD severity post-transplant compared with severity pretransplant was unchanged in 67%, worse in 26.5% and improved in 6.1% of patients. Twenty-five per cent of patients developed rPSC posttransplant. The occurrence of at least one episode of acute cellular rejection (hazard ratio 5.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 25.8) and cytomegalovirus mismatch (hazard ratio 4.2; 95% CI 1.1 to 15.4) were found to be significant predictors of rPSC. Although not statistically significant, there was no rPSC in patients without pre- or post-transplant IBD, and in only one patient with a colectomy. Actuarial patient survival rates at one, five and 10 years posttransplant were 97%, 86% and 79%, respectively. Although a significant proportion of patients experienced worsening IBD post-transplantation, the presence or severity of IBD did not influence rPSC or patient survival.

CONCLUSION

Acute cellular rejection and cytomegalovirus mismatch were both identified as independent predictors of rPSC. The impact of steroids and the ideal immunosuppressive regimen for the control of both IBD and PSC post-transplant requires further examination in prospective studies.

Colorectal cancer in post-liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Several malignancies have been reported to occur more often after liver transplantation. Whether this is also true for colorectal carcinoma is controversial. Our aims were 1) to compare the observed rate of colorectal carcinoma in a post-liver transplantation cohort with incidence data from the general Dutch population, and 2) to stratify for patients with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis, because primary sclerosing cholangitis is well established as a risk factor for colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

We searched the medical records of liver transplantation patients who had a liver transplantation in our center between 1986 and 2007 with a follow-up of at least 3 months. Incidence data from the general population were retrieved from the Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Registry. Outcome measures were defined as standardized incidence ratio and incidence rate per 100,000 person-years.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-four patients (58% men; mean age at liver transplantation, 46.6 y) were included in the 1986 to 2007 period. Bowel investigation before liver transplantation had been performed in 73% of patients. Median follow-up was 5.1 years (range, 0.25-20 y). The mean age at the end of follow-up was 52 years (SD, 13 y). Colorectal carcinoma was diagnosed in four patients (1%) during follow-up. The overall standardized incidence ratio for colorectal carcinoma in post-liver transplant recipients was 2.16 (95% CI: 0.81-5.76) compared with the general population and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.31-5.03) for nonprimary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the incidence of colorectal carcinoma is not increased in non-primary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplantation compared with the general population. A more intense colorectal carcinoma surveillance program based on this result remains controversial in nonprimary sclerosing cholangitis post-liver transplant recipients.

Risk of colorectal carcinoma in post-liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liver transplant patients (LTx) have an increased risk for developing de novo malignancies, but for colorectal cancer (CRC) this risk is less clear. We aimed to determine whether the CRC risk post-LTx was increased. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 1986 and 2008 reporting on the risk of CRC post-LTx. The outcomes were (1) CRC incidence rate (IR per 100,000 person-years (PY)) compared to a weighted age-matched control population using SEER and (2) relative risk (RR) for CRC compared to the general population. If no RR data were available, the RR was estimated using SEER. Twenty-nine studies were included. The overall post-LTx IR was 119 (95% CI 88-161) per 100,000 PY. The overall RR was 2.6 (95% CI 1.7-4.1). The non-primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) IR was 129 per 100,000 PY (95% CI 81-207). Compared to SEER (71 per 100,000 PY), the non-PSC RR was 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9). In conclusion, the overall transplants and the subgroup non-PSC transplants have an increased CRC risk compared to the general population. However, in contrast to PSC, non-PSC transplants do not need an intensified screening strategy compared to the general population until a prospective study further defines recommendations.

Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part II

Over the last decade the number of patients undergoing transplantation has increased. At the same time, effective peri- and postoperative care and better surgical techniques have resulted in greater numbers of recipients achieving long-term survival. Identification and effective management in the form of adequate treatment is essential, since any delay in diagnosis or treatment may result in graft loss or serious threat to patient's life. Various aspects of endoscopic findings that can be commonly encountered among liver transplant recipients are discussed herein. Topics include: persistent and/or recurrent esophageal varices, reflux, Candida or cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis, esophageal neoplasms, posttransplant peptic ulcer, biliary complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), Kaposi's sarcoma, CMV colitis and inflammatory bowel disease, colonic neoplasms, Clostridium difficile infection, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).

Oral budesonide for the therapy of post-liver transplant de novo inflammatory bowel disease: a case series and systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

The therapy for posttransplant IBD is clinically challenging. Patients receiving liver transplants are immunosuppressed to prevent rejection, but via an unknown mechanism develop de novo IBD in spite of receiving some of the same medications used for therapy in traditional IBD. In the published literature most of the patients who developed de novo IBD were treated with traditional corticosteroids. Exposure to systemic corticosteroids increases risks of infection, diabetes mellitus, and osteoporosis among other complications. Budesonide, a luminally active steroid with low systemic absorption, is an established therapeutic agent for IBD that should receive special considerations as first-line therapy in this patient population.

METHODS

We describe 3 cases of de novo IBD after liver transplantation. None of these patients had a history of IBD prior to their transplant. All 3 were treated with oral budesonide in lieu of systemic corticosteroids. Additionally, a Medline MeSH search was performed using the terms "inflammatory bowel disease" and "liver transplant" as part of a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

All 3 cases of de novo post transplant IBD went into clinical remission with oral budesonide. The Medline search ultimately revealed 19 case reports, case series or retrospective reviews on de novo post liver transplant IBD. Most reports focused on the diagnosis and risk factors and did not have an emphasis on therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the track record for budesonide in traditional IBD, and its documented efficacy and systemic steroid-sparing benefit, in our opinion this drug should be considered first-line therapy for de novo posttransplant IBD.

Incidence and management of colorectal cancer in liver transplant recipients

Liver transplant recipients are at an increased risk of developing de novo malignancies because of the prolonged immunosuppression necessary to avoid acute and chronic rejections. Skin cancers and lymphoproliferative diseases are the most common malignancies, but the overall incidence of colon cancer in this patient population does differ from that of the general population. Therefore, colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health concern in liver transplant recipients. Furthermore, there are unique subsets of liver transplant recipients, such as those with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease, who are at an increased risk for developing CRC after liver transplantation and might require special screening/surveillance strategies. The similar principles for management of colon cancer can be applied to transplant recipients if the adjustment to maintain the need for the long-term immunosuppression is made. Colectomy can be performed safely during the posttransplantation period. Prophylactic colectomy at the time of liver transplantation has been performed in some patients at high risk or with known premalignant conditions. Chemotherapy with 5- fluorouracil and oxaliplatin has been used in transplant recipients for the treatment of metastatic CRC; however, further research is required to examine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combination chemotherapy and biologic agents in this patient population. This review summarizes the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of de novo CRC in liver transplant recipients.

Impact of orthotopic liver transplant for primary sclerosing cholangitis on chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The effect of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and post-OLT immunosuppression on the disease course of pouchitis is not clear. The aims of this study were to compare the frequency of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) in PSC patients with or without OLT and to assess potential risk factors for CARP in these patients.

METHODS

Ulcerative colitis patients with PSC and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with or without OLT identified from our prospectively maintained pouch database were analyzed. CARP was diagnosed based on persistent symptomatic pouchitis after a 4-week single- or dual-antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 63 PSC/IPAA patients were studied, including 19 patients with OLT and 44 patients without OLT. Fifty patients (79.4%) had CARP. In both univariable and multivariable analyses (adjusting for OLT status), none of the variables studied was associated significantly with CARP (P > .20). All 7 patients (100%) with IPAA-then-OLT were diagnosed as having CARP, of whom 4 developed CARP before OLT, which persisted after OLT, and 3 had CARP after OLT. Of 12 patients with OLT-then-IPAA, 7 (58.3%) developed CARP. The frequency of CARP in OLT-then-IPAA was statistically significantly lower than that in IPAA-then-OLT (58.3% vs 100%; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

CARP is common in patients with ulcerative colitis and PSC. OLT in these patients may not affect the frequency of CARP in general and appears not to alter the disease course of pre-existing CARP. However, in a subset of patients, OLT might reduce the risk for the development of de novo CARP.

Five cases of de novo inflammatory bowel disease after orthotopic liver transplantation

Immunosuppression is currently the treatment of choice for severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Thus, it was anticipated that the course of preexisting IBD should improve after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Despite sufficient allograft immunosuppressive therapy, however, exacerbation of IBD or the development of de novo IBD after OLT were described in some cases, primarily in patients transplanted for end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). In addition, the development of de novo IBD in patients undergoing OLT for indications other than PSC was described. Evaluating our collective of 314 liver transplanted patients we found five patients transplanted for various indications other than PSC (autoimmune hepatitis [AIH], acute-on-chronic hepatitis B, Wilson's disease, and cryptogenic cirrhosis) who developed de novo IBD after OLT despite sufficient immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus or cyclosporine. PSC was widely excluded in these patients by clinical and histological examinations and there was no sign of an enteric infection. It was remarkable that all patients were suspected to have an autoimmune background. Four of our patients were women and almost all patients showed histologically typical signs of an ulcerative colitis (UC). To prevent allograft rejection, three of five patients were treated with cyclosporine and the other two with tacrolimus. After diagnosis, treatment with aminosalicylates and corticosteroids led to complete clinical and histological remission. However, relapses occurred frequently after termination of specific therapy. In combination with previous reports, our cases indicate an immune dysregulation leading to the development of de novo IBD after OLT under immunosuppressive therapy. Reviewing the literature, it should be considered that apart from the autoimmune background, immunosuppressive therapy may itself play a major role in the development of de novo IBD. From the clinical point of view, it is of critical importance to detect this phenomenon, since diarrhea is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients and therapy for this disorder completely differs from the treatment for other causes of diarrhea. Aminosalicylates and courses of corticosteroids offer an effective treatment.

Inflammatory bowel disease after liver transplantation: risk factors for recurrence and de novo disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and can recur or develop de novo after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and severity of IBD after liver transplantation and to perform a multivariate analysis for possible risk factors. In this retrospective study, 91 patients transplanted for PSC or AIH, without prior colectomy, were included. Sixty patients were transplanted for PSC, 31 for AIH. IBD activity before and after OLT and other possible risk factors were analysed in a multivariate model. Forty-nine patients (54%) had IBD before OLT. Forty patients (44%) had active IBD after transplantation: recurrence in 32 and de novo in 8. Cumulative risk for IBD after OLT was 15, 39 and 54% after 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. In 59% of patients with IBD prior to OLT the disease was more active after transplantation. Risk factors for recurrent disease were: symptoms at time of OLT, short interval of IBD before OLT and use of tacrolimus. 5-aminosalicylates were protective. A cytomegalovirus positive donor/negative recipient combination increased the risk for de novo IBD.

Incidence and risk factors for cancer after liver transplantation

De novo tumors (DNT) are a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), showing a higher overall incidence ranging from 4.7% to 15.7% in non-selected series. Skin cancer (SC) is the most frequent malignancy observed, ranging from 6% to 70% of the tumors observed, followed by post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) (4.3-30%). Different immunosuppressive protocols do not seem to influence DNT appearance. Colon and upper aerodigestive cancer after OLT seems to be more prone to develop when there are associated risk factors, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and alcoholic liver cirrhosis (ALC). Some risk factors, such as age, smoking, alcohol and others seem to play a role in higher risk for malignancy, but the presence of a long-term immunosuppressive state, more than the specific regimen used, is the basis for this higher incidence. Ethnic and demographic factors are also important variables influencing the heterogeneity of the results, especially influencing Kaposi's sarcoma and skin tumors.

Colorectal cancer after orthotopic liver transplantation

There is an increased incidence of de novo malignancies in post-liver transplant patients, commonly associated with chronic viral infection comprising lymphoproliferative disease and skin cancers, including squamous cell carcinoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. The overall incidence of colorectal cancer however in this population seems to be no different to the age and sex matched general population. In identified high risk patients like those with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the incidence of colorectal cancer appears to be higher. In IBD, like other pre-malignant conditions, the risk of developing malignancy increases exponentially with time, raising the question of whether the apparent increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer is the result of liver transplantation and immunosuppression or due to the natural history of IBD. For these PSC recipients, pre-transplant screening with colonoscopy and post-transplant surveillance for malignant change in the large bowel is crucial. The behaviour of inflammatory bowel disease post-liver transplant is largely unpredictable despite immunosuppression. Colorectal cancer when it occurs in the post-liver transplant patient should be managed according to current guidelines, stage for stage as for the population in general coupled with reduction in immunosuppression treatment.

The clinical course of ulcerative colitis after orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: further appraisal of immunosuppression post transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The course of ulcerative colitis (UC) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unclear. We documented the nationwide experience of the course of UC, before and after OLT for PSC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 470 liver transplants were performed for 413 patients between 1992 and 2003, in the Scottish Liver Transplantation Unit, UK. Twenty-six patients had co-existing UC/PSC. Of these, data from 20 patients were studied over a median period of 11.9 years before OLT and 4.4 years after OLT; of the others, four patients required colectomy prior to OLT, one died within 7 days of transplant, and one developed UC after transplant. A significantly higher relapse rate (number of relapses/year of follow-up) was seen after OLT (median 1.0 versus 0.3; interquartile range, 0.10-1.42 and 0.01-0.40, respectively; P = 0.007). The corticosteroids requirement (number of courses/year of follow-up) after OLT was also significantly higher (0.40 versus 0.10; interquartile range, 0.51-1.13 and 0.05-0.12, respectively; P = 0.003). Twenty per cent of patients (4/20) became corticosteroid dependent after OLT. Thirty-five per cent of patients (7/20) underwent colectomy after OLT: three for severe disease and four for neoplasia/dysplasia. Five patients (19%) developed neoplasia following OLT.

CONCLUSION

Despite immunosuppression, UC follows a more aggressive clinical course after OLT and is associated with a high rate of neoplasia.

Diarrhea in liver transplant recipients: etiology and management

Diarrhea is common after liver transplantation (LT). The true incidence of diarrhea in liver transplant recipients is unknown but possibly ranges from 10% to 43% based on a few published studies in other solid organ and bone marrow transplantation. Infectious etiologies, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), Clostridium difficile, and occasional atypical intestinal infections, are the most common causes. Diarrhea is also a frequent side effect of immunosuppressive medications. To variable extents, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine A (CSA), tacrolimus, and sirolimus are all known to be associated with diarrhea. Rarely, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), lymphoproliferative disorder, de novo inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), or colon cancer may present as diarrhea. Flare-up of preexisting IBD is also not uncommon after LT. However, the cause of acute diarrhea remains unidentified in 1 of 3 patients. This review summarizes the literature and provides recommendations on the management of acute diarrhea after LT. Although our focus is on LT, the etiology and management recommendations apply to most transplant recipients.

Sclerosing cholangitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by strictures of the biliary tree. It is closely associated with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis, although the precise etiology remains unknown. The prevalence of PSC, with its attendant medical burdens, appears to be higher than previously estimated; consequently, increasing numbers of patients are being diagnosed and treated in secondary care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Research into etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, small-duct PSC, and associations with cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal carcinoma are discussed, along with medical therapy and transplantation.

SUMMARY

Small-duct PSC is a distinct clinical entity associated with a benign course and minimal risk of cholangiocarcinoma compared with large-duct PSC. The incidence of gall bladder cancer is increased in patients with PSC, and yearly ultrasonographic screening, with cholecystectomy for gall bladder polyps, is recommended. Recent pilot studies have suggested that high-dose ursodeoxycholic acid (20 mg/kg body weight) may slow liver fibrosis and cholangiographic appearances. Importantly, ursodeoxycholic acid has also been shown to reduce the incidence of colonic dysplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with PSC and ulcerative colitis. Endoscopic therapy, usually balloon dilatation, is effective for benign dominant strictures that are causing jaundice. Liver transplant remains the only treatment in end-stage disease; however, posttransplant recurrence of PSC occurs in as many as one third of patients. Colorectal cancer develops posttransplant in 5 to 10% of those with inflammatory bowel disease. Annual screening colonoscopy is recommended for all patients with PSC with coexisting inflammatory bowel disease.