Gastric motor dysfunction: is eosinophilic mural gastritis a causative factor?

Esophageal dysmotility in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) represents a growing cause of chronic esophageal morbidity whose incidence and prevalence are increasing rapidly. The disease is characterized by eosinophilic infiltrates of the esophagus and organ dysfunction. Typical symptoms include dysphagia, chest pain, and bolus impaction, which are associated to mechanical obstructions in most patients. However, up to one in three EoE patients has no visible obstruction, suggesting that a motor disorder of the esophagus may underlie symptoms. Although potentially relevant for treatment refractoriness and symptomatic burden, esophageal dysmotility is often neglected when assessing EoE patients. The first systematic review investigating esophageal motility patterns in patients with EoE was published only recently. Accordingly, we reviewed the pathogenesis, assessment tools, manometric characteristics, and clinical implications of dysmotility in patients with EoE to highlight its clinical relevance. In summary, eosinophils can influence the amplitude of esophageal contractions via different mechanisms. The prevalence of dysmotility may increase with disease duration, possibly representing a late feature of EoE. Patients with EoE may display a wide range of motility disorders and possible disease-specific manometric pressurization patterns may be useful for raising a clinical suspicion. Intermittent dysmotility events have been found to correlate with symptoms on prolonged esophageal manometry, although high-resolution manometry studies have reported inconsistent results, possibly due to the suboptimal sensitivity of current manometry protocols. Motor abnormalities may recover following EoE treatment in a subset of patients, but invasive management of the motor disorder is required in some instances. In conclusion, esophageal motor abnormalities may have a role in eliciting symptoms, raising clinical suspicion, and influencing treatment outcome in EoE. The assessment of esophageal motility appears valuable in the EoE setting.

Systematic Review: esophageal motility patterns in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disorder of the esophagus characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Eosinophils can influence esophageal motility, leading to dysphagia worsening. The spectrum of esophageal motility in EoE is uncertain.

AIM

We performed a systematic review to investigate esophageal motility in EoE.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and EMBASE Classic were searched from inception to 16th November 2021. Studies reporting esophageal motility findings in EoE patients by means of conventional, prolonged, and/or high-resolution esophageal manometry were eligible.

RESULTS

Studies on esophageal conventional and high-resolution manometry (HRM) found that all types of manometric motor patterns can be found in patients with EoE and investigations on 24-hour prolonged manometry demonstrated an association between symptoms and intermittent dysmotility events, which can be missed during standard manometric analysis. Panesophageal pressurizations are the most common HRM finding and may help in formulating a clinical suspicion. Some motility abnormalities may reverse after medical treatment, while other major motility disorders like achalasia require invasive management for symptoms control. HRM metrics have demonstrated to correlate with inflammatory and fibrostenotic endoscopic features of EoE.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal motor abnormalities are common in patients with EoE and may contribute to symptoms. The resolution of dysmotility after medical treatment corroborates that eosinophils influence esophageal motility.

Gastroparesis: concepts, controversies, and challenges

Patients with gastroparesis often present a challenge to the treating physician. Postprandial symptoms with nausea and vomiting may not only lead to nutritional and metabolic consequences, but also cause significant disruptions to social activities that often center around food. While the definition of gastroparesis focuses on impaired gastric emptying, treatment options that affect gastric function are limited and often disappointing. The female predominance, the mostly idiopathic nature of the illness with a common history of abuse, and coexisting anxiety or depression show parallels with other functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. These parallels provided the rationale for some initial studies investigating alternative therapies that target the brain rather than the stomach. This emerging shift in medical therapy comes at a time when clinical studies suggest that gastric electrical stimulation may exert its effects by modulating visceral sensory processing rather than altering gastric motility. Physiologic and detailed anatomic investigations also support a more complex picture with different disease mechanisms, ranging from impaired accommodation to apparent visceral hypersensitivity or decreased interstitial cells of Cajal to inflammatory infiltration of myenteric ganglia. Delayed gastric emptying remains the endophenotype defining gastroparesis. However, our treatment options go beyond prokinetics and may allow us to improve the quality of life of affected individuals.

Duodenal implications in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a heterogeneous disorder associated with diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms. Studies have shown duodenal implications in the pathophysiology of FD. Duodenal hypersensitivity to acid, increased duodenal acid exposure, and abnormal responses to duodenal lipids or released cholecystokinin have been observed in patients with FD. Moreover, there is evidence indicating duodenal immune activation in FD. Alterations in the number of duodenal eosinophils or intraepithelial lymphocytes have been reported in a subset of FD patients, particularly in patients with post-infectious FD. Whether these abnormalities in the duodenum play a crucial role in the generation of dyspeptic symptoms needs to be elucidated. Further investigations on the relationship between duodenal abnormalities and well-known pathophysiologic mechanisms of FD are required. Furthermore, the causative factors related to the development of duodenal abnormalities in FD warrant further study.

Helicobacter pylori-negative gastritis in erosive esophagitis, nonerosive reflux disease or functional dyspepsia patients

BACKGROUND

Although Helicobacter pylori infection is believed to be the main cause of chronic gastritis, a US clinical trial investigating the long-term effects of lansoprazole as maintenance therapy for erosive esophagitis revealed a surprisingly high prevalence (over 90%) and severity of chronic gastritis in H. pylori-negative subjects.

GOALS

This study aims to compare prevalence and severity of chronic gastritis of the body and antrum in H. pylori-negative subjects with erosive esophagitis, nonerosive reflux disease, or functional dyspepsia from several trials.

STUDY

Pretreatment gastric histology was compared in 1595 H. pylori-negative subjects with erosive esophagitis (>or= grade 2; n=196), nonerosive reflux disease (n=688), or functional dyspepsia (n=711) who participated in US Takeda-sponsored lansoprazole trials.

RESULTS

Pretreatment histology data from US clinical studies showed that 67.5% and 75.0% of H. pylori-negative adult subjects with erosive esophagitis had moderate or severe body and antral chronic gastritis, respectively. Chronic gastritis was also observed in H. pylori-negative subjects with nonerosive reflux disease or functional dyspepsia, although prevalence was significantly less (P<0.001) than in erosive esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic gastritis in H. pylori-negative subjects is more common than previously appreciated. These results highlight the need for better characterization of gastric mucosal histology in these gastrointestinal disorders.

Esophageal dysmotility in children with eosinophilic esophagitis: a study using prolonged esophageal manometry

OBJECTIVES

The pathophysiology of dysphagia in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is unknown but may be related to abnormal esophageal motor function. Symptoms rarely occur during stationary esophageal manometry, so it has been difficult to establish an association between symptoms and motor events. Our aim was to evaluate esophageal motor function in children with EoE with the use of stationary manometry and ambulatory prolonged esophageal manometry and pH-metry (PEMP).

METHODS

PEMP was performed in children with EoE and compared with controls and children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Peristalsis was considered effective when the esophageal contractions had a normal amplitude and propagation. Results are expressed as mean+/-s.e.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with EoE, 13 with GERD, and 11 controls were studied. Values are expressed as mean+/-s.e. Stationary manometry identified abnormal peristalsis in 41% of children with EoE. During PEMP, children with EoE had an increased number of isolated (16.7+/-3.8 vs. 9.5+/-1.6 vs. 6.5+/-1.1; P<0.03) and high-amplitude contractions (4.1+/-1.2 vs. 1.8+/-0.8 vs. 0.1+/-0.1; P<0.03), and higher percentage ineffective peristalsis both during fasting (70.5%+/-2.5 vs. 57.8%+/-3.0 vs. 53.8%+/-1.9; P<0.05) and during meals (68.4+/-3.4 vs. 55.3+/-2.8 vs. 48.1+/-2.8; P<0.05) when compared with children with GERD and controls. Thirteen patients with EoE experienced 21 episodes of dysphagia, and all correlated with simultaneous abnormal motor function.

CONCLUSIONS

PEMP allowed the detection of ineffective peristalsis in children with EoE. Symptoms observed in children with EoE may be related to esophageal motor dysfunction.

Clinical management of motility disorders in children

We review the current clinical evaluation and management of the most common esophageal and gastrointestinal motility disorders in children based on the literature and our experience in a pediatric motility center in the United States. The disorders discussed include esophageal achalasia, pre- and post-fundoplication motility disorders, gastroparesis, motility disorders occurring after repair of congenital atresias, motility disorders associated with gastroschisis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, motility after intestinal transplantation, motility disorders after colonic resection for Hirschsprung's disease, chronic functional constipation, and motility disorders associated with imperforate anus.

Factors contributing to hospitalization for gastroparesis exacerbations

BACKGROUND

The clinical course of patients with gastroparesis is characterized by symptomatic exacerbations often necessitating hospitalization.

AIMS

To investigate precipitating factors leading to hospitalization for exacerbation of symptoms in patients with gastroparesis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 103 admissions (63 patients) for gastroparesis exacerbation.

RESULTS

Etiologic categories for gastroparetic patients were diabetic (43%), idiopathic (39%), and post surgical (8%). Poor glycemic control was present in 36%, infection in 19% (12 urinary tract infections and two bacteremia), and noncompliance with or intolerance of, medications in six and 5% of patients, respectively. Fasting morning cortisol concentrations were \3 mcg/dl in 9%. Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were seen in 34 of 65 (52%) and 11 of 50 patients (22%), respectively. No identifiable infection was found in 74 and 45% of patients with elevated ESR and elevated CRP, respectively. ESR and CRP were higher when patients were symptomatic necessitating hospitalization (26.2 +/- 6.6 mm/h and 1.6 +/- 1.0 mg/l) compared with when they were seen in outpatient follow-up and less symptomatic (10.3 +/- 2.9 mm/h and 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/l; P = 0.0001 and P = 0.211, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor glycemic control, infection, noncompliance with/intolerance of medications, and, perhaps, adrenal insufficiency were contributory factors leading to hospitalizations of gastroparetic patients. Hospitalized patients with gastroparesis exacerbations had elevated ESR and CRP levels. Although many patients with elevated inflammatory markers had evidence of infection, some did not. Assessment of inflammatory markers may help indicate those gastroparetic patients in whom a search for infection should be undertaken.

Duodenal mastocytosis, eosinophilia and intraepithelial lymphocytosis as possible disease markers in the irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia (FD) are common functional disorders without defined pathology. Mast cells and eosinophils interact with T lymphocytes and may alter enteric nerve and smooth muscle function.

AIM

To examine mast cell, eosinophil and intraepithelial lymphocyte populations in duodenal biopsies of subjects with IBS and FD.

METHODS

A random sample of an adult Swedish population (n = 1001; mean age 54 years; 51% female) underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy; 51 cases with FD and 41 cases with IBS were compared with 48 randomly selected controls. Eosinophils were identified by light microscopy; mast cells by immunocytochemistry (CD117). Intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted per 100 enterocytes. Cell counts were quantified by counting the number per high power field (HPF) in 5HPFs in the bulb (D1) and second part of duodenum (D2), summed over 5HPFs at each site.

RESULTS

Cases and controls showed similar demographics. Compared to controls, IELs in IBS-constipation were significantly increased (P = 0.005). Mast cells were significantly increased in IBS in D2 (P < 0.001), while eosinophils were significantly increased in FD in D1 and D2 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Duodenal mast cell hyperplasia is linked to IBS and eosinophilia to FD, and duodenal biopsy may identify subsets of these disorders.

Management of gastroparesis

Gastroparesis presents with nausea, vomiting, early satiety and abdominal discomfort, as well as a range of nongastrointestinal manifestations in association with delays in gastric emptying. The disorder may be a consequence of systemic illnesses, such as diabetes mellitus, occur as a complication of gastroesophageal surgery or develop in an idiopathic fashion and may mimic other disorders with normal gastric emptying. Some cases of idiopathic gastroparesis present after a viral infection. Management relies primarily on therapies that accelerate gastric emptying or reduce vomiting, although endoscopic or surgical options are available for refractory cases. Current research is focusing on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying development of delayed gastric emptying, as well as factors unrelated to motor dysfunction that may elicit some symptoms. Future pharmaceuticals will target the contractile and nonmotor defects via novel pathways. Novel electrical stimulation techniques will be employed either alone or in combination with medications.

Differences in intragastric pH in diabetic vs. idiopathic gastroparesis: relation to degree of gastric retention

Evidence suggests that distinct mechanisms underlie diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Differences in gastric acid in gastroparesis of different etiologies and varying degrees of gastric stasis are uninvestigated. We tested the hypotheses that 1) gastric pH profiles show differential alteration in diabetic vs. idiopathic gastroparesis and 2) abnormal pH profiles relate to the severity of gastric stasis. Sixty-four healthy control subjects and 44 gastroparesis patients (20 diabetic, 24 idiopathic) swallowed wireless transmitting capsules and then consumed (99m)Tc-sulfur colloid-labeled meals for gastric scintigraphy. Gastric pH from the capsule was recorded every 5 s. Basal pH was higher in diabetic (3.64 +/- 0.41) vs. control subjects (1.90 +/- 0.18) and idiopathic subjects (2.41 +/- 0.42; P < 0.05). Meals evoked initial pH increases that were greater in diabetic (4.98 +/- 0.32) than idiopathic patients (3.89 +/- 0.39; P = 0.03) but not control subjects (4.48 +/- 0.14). pH nadirs prior to gastric capsule evacuation were higher in diabetic patients (1.50 +/- 0.23) than control subjects (0.58 +/- 0.11; P = 0.003). Four-hour gastric retention was similar in diabetic (18.3 +/- 0.5%) and idiopathic (19.4 +/- 0.5%) patients but higher than control subjects (2.2 +/- 0.5%; P < 0.001). Compared with control subjects, those with moderate-severe stasis (>20% retention at 4 h) had higher basal (3.91 +/- 0.55) and nadir pH (2.23 +/- 0.42) values (P < 0.05). In subgroup analyses, both diabetic and idiopathic patients with moderate-severe gastroparesis exhibited increased pH parameters vs. those with mild gastroparesis. In conclusion, diabetic patients with gastroparesis exhibit reduced gastric acid, an effect more pronounced in those with severely delayed gastric emptying. Idiopathic gastroparetic subjects exhibit nearly normal acid profiles, although those with severely delayed emptying show reduced acid vs. those with mild delays. Thus both etiology and degree of gastric stasis determine gastric acidity in gastroparesis.

Esophageal dysmotility in patients who have eosinophilic esophagitis

The understanding of esophageal motility alterations in patients who have eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is in its infancy despite the common presenting complaint of dysphagia. A diversity of motility disorders has been reported in patients who have EE including achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, and nonspecific motility alterations including high-amplitude esophageal body contractions, tertiary contractions, abnormalities in lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and other peristaltic problems. Some evidence suggests that treatment of EE will improve motility. Technological advances such as high-resolution manometry and combined manometry with impedance may provide new insight into more subtle motility abnormalities.

Gastroparesis: symptoms, evaluation, and treatment

Gastroparesis presents with gastrointestinal symptoms and nongastrointestinal manifestations in association with objective delays in gastric emptying. The condition may complicate several systemic disorders or may be idiopathic in nature. The diagnosis is made by directed evaluation to exclude organic diseases, which can mimic the clinical presentation of gastroparesis coupled with quantification of gastric emptying. Current therapies rely on dietary modifications, medications to stimulate gastric evacuation, and agents to reduce vomiting. Endoscopic and surgical options are increasingly used for cases refractory to medication treatment.

Esofagitis eosinofílica

Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterised for a dense infiltration of the esophagus by eosinophilic leukocytes. The disease's origin is a local reaction to different antigens of which the patient presents previous sensitization, acquired by digestive, inhaled or even epicutaneous exposure. The esophagus contains different cellular types resident in its structure, with capability to participate in the capture, processing and antigens' presentation to T lymphocytes, which could initiate a T helper 2-type immunological response mostly mediated by interleukin-5, with a possible T helper 1-type component. Local production of immunoglobulin E could also participate in the pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis, and for this reason, this disease can be considered a mixed-humoural and cell-mediated immunological disturbance. Studies directed to identificate responsible allergens must consider test for determine immunoglobulin E-mediated reactions as well as cell-mediated hyper-responsiveness responses. Main symptom of eosinophilic esophagitis are dysphagia and esophageal food impactations, which are conditioned by endoscopic alterations and motor disturbances objectively demonstrated by manometric recorders. Eosinophil and mast cell's activation and degranulation against responsible antigens cause damage over esophageal epithelium and dynamic disturbances over neuromuscular components in esophageal wall. Therapies proposed for eosinophilic esophagitis include control of antigen exposition, endoscopic dilation of stenosis and drugs with antieosinophilic effect; in this group topical steroids can be outlined for the capacity of them to restore the histology and the esophageal motility in parallel to vanishment of inflammation.

Esofagitis eosinofílica. Revisión de los conceptos fisiopatológicos y clínicos actuales

Eosinophilc esophagitis (EE) is an emerging disease which is characterized by a dense infiltration of the esophagus by eosinophilic leukocytes. The main symptoms of this disease are dysphagia and frequent food impaction in esophagus, and they are due to a hypersentivity response to different foods or aeroallergens. Eosinophil accumulation in the esophageal epithelium is determined by local production of eosinophilotropic cytokines and chemokines, which have been well defined as a TH2-type hypersensitivity reaction in animal models of the disease. Esophageal epithelium, after T CD4+ lymphocytes stimulation, contains all the necessary cell types for the development of local immunoallergic responses. However, there is increasing data on the significant role that humoral immunity could play in the pathophysiology of EE, by means of the action of IgE over mast cells function. The high density of T CD8+ lymphocytes in inflammatory infiltrate suggests that a TH1-type reaction could also participate in the mechanism of the disease. Proteins contained in cytoplasmic granules of activated eosinophils and mast cells could act over neural and muscular components of the esophageal wall, triggering motor disturbances which can be measured by means of manometric recordings and justify the esophageal symptoms. This paper aims to review the newest clinical aspects of EE and the results of studies directed at investigating the pathophysiology of the disease. Furthermore, we carry out a critical review of available therapeutic options.

Eosinophils in the gastrointestinal tract

Although we know that eosinophils reside in the normal gastrointestinal tract and increase during inflammatory states, their exact role in gut homeostasis and in the pathogenesis of inflammatory processes is not certain. An increasing number of clinical reports suggest that eosinophils participate in the pathogenesis of mucosal inflammation, and emerging literature is beginning to define these mechanisms. For example, homing of eosinophils to the gastrointestinal tract is better understood with respect to the roles of specific eosinophilic attractants, such as the eotaxins and interleukin-5. As mechanisms of eosinophil recruitment, activation, and functional responses are further elucidated, novel targets for treatment strategies in specific diseases will likely follow. We review recent developments in eosinophil immunobiology as they relate to gastrointestinal inflammation and provide an update on clinical aspects of eosinophilic esophagitis as they relate to eosoinophilic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.

Allergy and intestinal dysmotility--evidence of genuine causal linkage?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The relationship between allergy and motility has been controversial. There is, however, accumulating evidence demonstrating that mucosal allergic responses may disrupt gut motility, and may also potentially alter nociceptive pathways to cause visceral hyperalgesia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Experimental studies implicate T helper 2 cells and the cytokines interleukin-4 and -13 in antigen-induced dysmotility, and interleukin-5 in the pathogenesis of mucosal eosinophilia. Both mast cells and eosinophils play obligatory roles in different forms of experimental antigen-induced dysmotility. Overall clinical findings appear to implicate eosinophil infiltration in proximal and distal dysmotility syndromes (oesophageal, gastric and colorectal), and induced mast cell degranulation in mid-gut dysmotility. There is also evidence that mucosal allergic responses may induce long-term changes in visceral perception, including alteration of limbic response, leading to sustained abnormality in visceral sensation.

SUMMARY

Clinical evidence implicating mucosal allergic responses in dysmotility has been extended to include disorders considered previously entirely functional, such as in some cases of irritable bowel syndrome. Only a proportion of cases are, however, caused by food allergy and a future challenge is to differentiate patients with similar symptoms, but induced by different mechanisms.