Clinical Experience with Perindopril in Patients Nonresponsive to Previous Antihypertensive Therapy: A Large US Community Trial

Comparative Solid-State Stability of Perindopril Active Substance vs. Pharmaceutical Formulation

This paper presents the results obtained after studying the thermal stability and decomposition kinetics of perindopril erbumine as a pure active pharmaceutical ingredient as well as a solid pharmaceutical formulation containing the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Since no data were found in the literature regarding the spectroscopic description, thermal behavior, or decomposition kinetics of perindopril, our goal was the evaluation of the compatibility of this antihypertensive agent with the excipients in the tablet under ambient conditions and to study the effect of thermal treatment on the stability of perindopril erbumine. ATR-FTIR (Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared) spectroscopy, thermal analysis (thermogravimetric mass curve (TG-thermogravimetry), derivative thermogravimetric mass curve (DTG), and heat flow (HF)) and model-free kinetics were chosen as investigational tools. Since thermal behavior is a simplistic approach in evaluating the thermal stability of pharmaceuticals, in-depth kinetic studies were carried out by classical kinetic methods (Kissinger and ASTM E698) and later with the isoconversional methods of Friedman, Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa. It was shown that the main thermal degradation step of perindopril erbumine is characterized by activation energy between 59 and 69 kJ/mol (depending on the method used), while for the tablet, the values were around 170 kJ/mol. The used excipients (anhydrous colloidal silica, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, and magnesium stearate) should be used in newly-developed generic solid pharmaceutical formulations, since they contribute to an increased thermal stability of perindopril erbumine.

Combination therapy in the extended cardiovascular continuum: a focus on perindopril and amlodipine

The progression of cardiovascular disease could be regarded as following atherosclerosis-related and age-related pathways. The starting points for these pathways are different--risk factors or aortic ageing--but they conclude in the same way: end-stage heart disease. Together these interlinked pathways form the extended cardiovascular continuum. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors have been shown to interrupt or slow the progression of cardiovascular disease along one pathway, the cardiovascular atherosclerotic continuum. Cardiovascular protection with RAAS inhibitors varies; different RAAS inhibitors offer different levels of protection. Similarly, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) also have clearly shown protective effect of cardiovascular system, especially as it regards cerebrovascular disease risk. The AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) showed that a combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril and CCB amlodipine offered better cardiovascular protection in at-risk hypertensive patients than beta-blocker and thiazide. By attenuating the deleterious effects of cardiovascular disease at multiple stages of the extended cardiovascular continuum on top of lowering blood pressure (BP), perindopril and amlodipine could interrupt and slow the progression of cardiovascular disease. These antihypertensive agents have complementary vascular effects that enhance cardiovascular protection and reduce side-effects. Evidence from ASCOT shows that antihypertensive and vascular effects of amlodipine with and without perindopril have translated into real-life clinical benefits. A strategy using ACE inhibitors and CCBs, such as perindopril and amlodipine, to target multiple stages in both pathways of cardiovascular disease could effectively reduce cardiovascular risk and lower BP.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in cardiovascular disease: evidence with perindopril

Perindopril is a long-acting, once-daily lipophilic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with high tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme affinity, lowering angiotensin II and potentiating bradykinin. Its efficacy, safety and tolerability are well established in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Moreover, large morbidity-mortality trials, such as the EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) and Perindopril pROtection aGainst REcurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), have shown that antihypertensive treatment with perindopril reduces and prevents cardiovascular disease in a large range of patients with vascular diseases, whether hypertensive or not. Thus, the outcome of these and other trials support the concept of cardiovascular protective properties of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with perindopril in addition to the obvious blood-pressure-lowering effect. Considering its properties and the gathered clinical evidence on efficacy and tolerability, perindopril fulfils the criteria of the latest guidelines for hypertension and cardiovascular disease management and should therefore be considered as a first-line antihypertensive agent, forming a consistent part of the comprehensive strategy against hypertension and related cardiovascular complications.

RAAS inhibition and mortality in hypertension

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) regulates the body's hemodynamic equilibrium, circulating volume, and electrolyte balance, and is a key therapeutic target in hypertension, the world's leading cause of premature mortality. Hypertensive disorders are strongly linked with an overactive RAAS, and RAAS inhibitors, like angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), are routinely used to treat high blood pressure (BP). BP reduction is one of the main goals of current European hypertension guidelines. Oral ACE inhibitors, the oldest category of RAAS inhibitor, were commercially released over 30 years ago in the early 1980s, over a decade before the first ARBs became available. The introduction of ACE inhibitors heralded major changes in the way hypertension and cardiovascular disease were treated. Although the decision of the medical community to replace older ACE inhibitors with more modern ARBs in the 1990s was debatable, it did nevertheless allow scientists to learn more about the angiotensin receptors involved in RAAS stimulation. This and much else of value have been discovered since RAAS inhibitors first became available, but some surprising gaps in our knowledge exist. Until recently, the effect of RAAS inhibition on mortality in hypertension was unknown. This question was recently addressed by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in populations who received contemporary antihypertensive medication. The results of this meta-analysis have helped elucidate the long-term consequences of treatment with RAAS inhibitors on mortality in hypertension. This article will consider the differences between RAAS inhibitors in terms of pharmacological and clinical effects and analyze the impact of the main types of RAAS inhibitor, ACE inhibitors and ARBs, on mortality reduction in hypertensive patients with reference to this latest meta-analysis.

Dose-dependent antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of perindopril in a large, observational, 12-week, general practice-based study

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend the use of full therapeutic dosages of antihypertensive agents, or combination therapy, to improve BP control of hypertensive patients in primary healthcare.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the dose-dependent antihypertensive efficacy and safety of perindopril 4 and 8 mg/day in the clinical setting.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

The CONFIDENCE study was a prospective, observational, multicenter trial. This was a real-world, clinic-based, outpatient study involving 880 general practitioners/primary-care clinics and 113 specialists in Canada.

PATIENTS

The study included untreated or inadequately managed patients with hypertension (i.e. seated BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg, or ≥ 130/80 mmHg in the presence of diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or proteinuria) without coronary artery disease (CAD).

INTERVENTION

Treatment consisted of perindopril 4 mg/day, uptitrated to 8 mg/day as required for BP control at visit 2, for 12 weeks. Among the patients already being treated at baseline, perindopril either directly replaced all previous ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]), or was added to antihypertensive treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCBs), diuretics, or β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers).

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the mean changes in BP from baseline following treatment with perindopril 4 and 8 mg/day as well as the proportion of patients achieving BP control (BP <140/90 mmHg, or <130/80 mmHg in diabetic patients) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary analyses included the incidence of adverse events and compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 8298 hypertensive patients entered the study: 56% with newly diagnosed hypertension and 44% with uncontrolled hypertension. Mean SBP/DBP decreased significantly from baseline (152.5  ±  10.8/89.5  ±  9 mmHg) over 12 weeks (-18.5/-9.7 mmHg; p < 0.001). At visit 2, 23% of patients were uptitrated to perindopril 8 mg/day, which resulted in an additional mean 10.1/5.3 mmHg BP reduction; this reduction was even greater (15.1/5.7 mmHg) among a separate group of severely hypertensive patients (i.e. SBP >170 mmHg or DBP >109 mmHg at baseline). Target BP was achieved in 54% of the ITT population. Both perindopril 4 mg/day and perindopril 8 mg/day were well tolerated and compliance was high throughout the study.

CONCLUSION

In the clinical outpatient setting, perindopril was found to be an effective dose-dependent and well tolerated antihypertensive treatment, with good compliance. Uptitration to the full therapeutic dosage of perindopril is an efficient approach for the management of a broad range of hypertensive patients without CAD.

Delayed angioedema during therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

Introduction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are leading cause of drug-induced angioedema, with incidence of 0.1 to 0.2%. The angioedema is not of immune nature; in predisposed individuals it is caused by accumulation of vasoactive mediators due to reduced activity of angiotensinconverting enzyme. Case report. We presented a 63-year old male patient suffering from hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who had developed two episodes of angioedema during a 5-year long therapy with enalapril. The first episode happened after three, and the second after five years of the therapy. On both occasions, the patient was admitted to the hospital and tracheotomy was avoided in the last moment. Conclusion. Long-term therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors could be associated with delayed angioedema, especially in patients with inflammation of airways caused by infection or chronic irritation.

Antihypertensive efficacy of perindopril 5-10 mg/day in primary health care: an open-label, prospective, observational study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Optimal control of hypertension reduces the risk of long-term cardiovascular complications, and current guidelines recommend blood pressure (BP) targets of <140/90 mmHg for patients. Despite this, the BP of many patients with hypertension in primary health care remains poorly controlled. The ACE inhibitor perindopril has proven BP-lowering efficacy as well as protective effects against cardiovascular events among patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors. The PREFER study assessed the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of perindopril 5-10 mg/day among hypertensive patients who were unresponsive to treatment with other ACE-inhibitor-based regimens.

METHODS

The PREFER study was an open-label, prospective, observational study conducted in primary health-care centres throughout Romania. Patients selected for the study (n = 824; mean + or - SD age 60.3 + or - 9.8 years) had uncontrolled hypertension (i.e. seated BP > or =140/90 mmHg, or > or = 130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus or at high cardiovascular risk) despite receiving ACE inhibitors either alone or in free combination with other antihypertensive classes. At study entry, current ACE inhibitor treatment was replaced by perindopril 5 mg/day. Patients were followed up monthly for 3 months and the dosage of perindopril could be increased to 10 mg/day in cases of failure to achieve BP control. No other change in antihypertensive therapy was permitted.

RESULTS

Replacing the previous ACE inhibitor with perindopril 5-10 mg/day resulted in decreases of 26.2 mmHg (from 162.6 + or - 15.6 to 136.4 + or - 14.6 mmHg [p < 0.001]) in systolic BP and of 12.6 mmHg (from 96.9 + or - 17.2 to 84.3 + or - 12.8 mmHg [p < 0.001]) in diastolic BP. Mean pulse pressure (PP) was reduced by 13.6 mmHg (from 65.7 to 52.1 mmHg) with greater decreases seen in patients aged >70 years or with isolated systolic hypertension. BP control was achieved in 48.1% of the previously uncontrolled population. Antihypertensive efficacy was observed across patient subgroups regardless of the severity of hypertension at baseline and number of cardiovascular risk factors. Patient compliance with treatment was high throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Perindopril 5-10 mg/day lowers BP and PP and improves BP control among hypertensive patients who were previously unresponsive to other ACE inhibitor-based regimens.

Efficacy of chronic hepatitis C therapy in community-based trials

Prospective, randomized, controlled, phase 3 clinical trials establish pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa plus ribavirin as the standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Such clinical trials are conducted in a highly regimented manner; patients must meet strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment is administered under rigid protocols with close monitoring by study personnel. Whether the results of phase 3 trials can be generalized or achieved in everyday clinical practice is questioned in several therapeutic areas. The efficacy of PEG-IFN alfa plus ribavirin therapy observed in pivotal phase 3 trials has been confirmed in several community-based trials conducted in North America and Europe, demonstrating consistent overall rates of sustained virologic response across a wide range of patient populations. Sustained virologic response rates stratified by genotype, viral load, fibrosis score, age, and ethnicity, factors known to impact treatment outcome, are consistent between these trials and comparable to those reported in clinical trials. The United States-based WIN-R trial confirmed the value of combining weight-based ribavirin dosing with weight-based PEG-IFN alfa-2b dosing across a spectrum of patient body weights. Large Canadian trials (POWeR and EAP), a German trial (AWB), a French study (Hepatys), and an Italian study demonstrated that PEG-IFN alfa plus ribavirin produces excellent efficacy in difficult-to-treat patient populations. Collectively, these results confirm the efficacy of current standard treatment regimens in a wide range of community-based settings, affording clinicians confidence that they can attain results similar to those of rigidly controlled randomized trials.

Perindopril for control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular risk factors: an open-label, observational, multicentre, general practice-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hypertension, one of the major treatable cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, usually occurs in association with other major risk factors. As well as providing rapid blood pressure (BP) goal attainment, antihypertensive therapy should also provide reductions in CV events and mortality in a wide range of patients. For this, higher dosages and combinations of antihypertensive agents are often required. ACE inhibitors are recommended as first-line agents for control of hypertension in patients with additional CV risk factors. The PEACH (Perindopril's Effect At Controlling Hypertension) study was a community-based study performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high-dose perindopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and additional risk factors for CV disease.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicentre observational study conducted in Canadian general practice clinics. The study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of perindopril given once daily for 10 weeks uptitrated to the maximal recommended dose of perindopril as required for BP control in newly diagnosed or previously treated patients with uncontrolled mild to moderate hypertension and >or=1 additional risk factor. Patients not achieving target BP after 2 weeks of therapy were uptitrated from perindopril 4 mg to perindopril 8 mg once daily. Efficacy endpoints included reduction in systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP and BP control. Tolerability assessments included adverse effects and physicians' assessment of tolerability. The number of missed doses was also recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 2220 patients with hypertension and >or=1 other risk factor were prescribed perindopril at 291 centres; 51.9% were male, 78.3% Caucasian, 12.8% Asian, 36.2%>or=65 years of age and 34.5% had uncontrolled BP despite previous antihypertensive treatment. Compared with previously treated patients, treatment-naive patients had fewer risk factors, and a higher proportion were Asian (p<0.05 for all comparisons). Most patients (76%) had 1-2 risk factors. Perindopril produced significant SBP/DBP reductions at 2 and 10 weeks (-15.8/-8.0 and -21.1/-11.0 mmHg, respectively). Overall, at week 10, BP control rate was 53.6%, better than at week 2 in the overall cohort and in all subgroups. Uptitration to high-dose perindopril to achieve BP control was required in 46% of patients with one additional risk factor compared with 64% of patients with >or=4 additional risk factors. These results demonstrate that the more risk factors the patient has, the greater the need for high-dose perindopril to achieve BP control. Perindopril was well tolerated as indicated by the high proportion of physicians (95.9%) reporting 'good' to 'excellent' tolerability at week 10.

CONCLUSION

In this community-based clinical practice trial, up to 10 weeks' perindopril therapy, uptitrated to the maximal recommended dose as required for BP control, significantly reduced SBP/DBP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension and additional CV risk factors. Patients with more risk factors were more likely to require high-dose perindopril.

Brief review: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angioedema: anesthetic implications

PURPOSE

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are a group of drugs used to treat hypertension and heart failure, with additional benefits, such as cardiovascular and renal protection, in patients with diabetes. However, angioedema as a complication of ACEI therapy is under-recognized. As there are important implications for anesthesiologists and emergency medicine physicians, a review was undertaken to document the scope of the problem of ACEI-induced angioedema..

METHODS

A review of the published literature (identified by searching Medline, EMBASE and CINAHL) was undertaken, addressing the clinical uses of ACEIs and the incidence, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of angioedema associated with the use of these drugs.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The incidence of ACEI related angioedema has increased from 0.1-0.2% to 1% over the last decade. Patients who are receiving ACEIs are predisposed to developing angioedema which may be triggered by trauma, airway instrumentation, infection, and irritant fumes, particularly in those who are at increased risk. Cases of acute facial and airway oedema, due to ACEI drug administration, may be misdiagnosed as an anaphylactic reaction, and the association with ACEIs may be ignored. Some cases of intraoperative and postoperative airway edema may be precipitated by airway instrumentation in patients receiving ACEI drugs. The severity of airway compromise ranges from mild facial edema to severe laryngeal or subglottic edema which may prove life-threatening.

CONCLUSION

In view of the widespread clinical indications and ever-increasing use of ACEI drugs, the potentially life-threatening adverse reaction of ACEI-associated angioedema, and its treatment, must be recognized by anesthesiologists and all clinicians involved in airway management.

ACE inhibition in hypertension: focus on perindopril

Ongoing developments in our understanding of cardiovascular disease, together with the introduction of new drugs to treat these conditions, has led to much debate over the optimal management of hypertension. The ALLHAT study showed no major differences in cardiovascular outcome among three major classes of antihypertensive drugs. Indeed, large meta-analyses have substantiated this view, and most experts would agree that BP reduction matters more than the choice of antihypertensive agent. However, recently published data from the ASCOT-BPLA trial for hypertensive patients at moderate risk of cardiac events have caused some experts to re-evaluate this view. The recent Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration publication confirmed this change. In the ASCOT-BPLA trial, antihypertensive therapy based on amlodipine+perindopril significantly reduced total and cardiovascular mortality as well as other clinically relevant outcomes in comparison with a traditional strategy based on atenolol and a thiazide diuretic, despite both regimens producing nonsignificantly different reductions in brachial BP. These findings suggest that amlodipine/perindopril may exert a beneficial effect by acting on other parameters such as central BP or BP variability. ACE inhibitors have been shown to have antiatherosclerotic and antithrombogenic effects, to improve endothelial dysfunction, and to prevent cardiac remodeling in patients with coronary heart disease. In this regard, perindopril, which has relatively high affinity for ACE and true 24-hour duration of action, is one of the most extensively studied ACE inhibitors. More recent data suggest that ACE inhibitors reduce arterial stiffness, an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events, and have a beneficial effect on central aortic BP, thus providing a possible explanation for the findings of ASCOT-BPLA and confirming that ACE inhibitors are an appropriate first choice for patients with hypertension.