Lack of methadone dose alterations or withdrawal symptoms during therapy with lopinavir/ritonavir

Drug-drug interactions and clinical considerations with co-administration of antiretrovirals and psychotropic drugs

Psychotropic medications are frequently co-prescribed with antiretroviral therapy (ART), owing to a high prevalence of psychiatric illness within the population living with HIV, as well as a 7-fold increased risk of HIV infection among patients with psychiatric illness. While ART has been notoriously associated with a multitude of pharmacokinetic drug interactions involving the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, the magnitude and clinical impact of these interactions with psychotropics may range from negligible effects on plasma concentrations to life-threatening torsades de pointes or respiratory depression. This comprehensive review summarizes the currently available information regarding drug-drug interactions between antiretrovirals and pharmacologic agents utilized in the treatment of psychiatric disorders-antidepressants, stimulants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, mood stabilizers, and treatments for opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder-and provides recommendations for their management. Additionally, overlapping toxicities between antiretrovirals and the psychotropic classes are highlighted. Knowledge of the interaction and adverse effect potential of specific antiretrovirals and psychotropics will allow clinicians to make informed prescribing decisions to better promote the health and wellness of this high-risk population.

Finding what works: identification of implementation strategies for the integration of methadone maintenance therapy and HIV services in Vietnam

Background

Integration of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and HIV services is an evidence-based intervention (EBI) that benefits HIV care and reduces costs. While MMT/HIV integration is recommended by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it is not widely implemented, due to organizational and operational barriers. Our study applied an innovative process to identify implementation strategies to address these barriers.

Methods

Our process was adapted from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) protocol and consisted of two main phases. In Phase 1, we conducted 16 in-depth interviews with stakeholders and developed matrices to display barriers to integration. In Phase 2, we selected implementation strategies that addressed the barriers identified in Phase 1 and conducted a poll to vote on the most important and feasible strategies among a panel with expertise in cultural context and implementation science.

Results

Barriers fell into two broad categories: policy and programmatic. At the policy level, barriers included lack of a national mandate, different structures (MMT vs. HIV clinic) for cost reimbursement and staff salaries, and resistance on the part of staff to take on additional tasks without compensation. Programmatic barriers included the need for cross-training in MMT and HIV tasks, staff accountability, and commitment from local leaders. In Phase 2, we focused on programmatic challenges. Based on voting results and iterative dialogue with our expert panel, we selected several implementation strategies in the domains of technical assistance, staff accountability, and local commitment that targeted these barriers.

Conclusions

Key programmatic barriers to MMT/HIV integration in Vietnam may be addressed through implementation strategies that focus on technical assistance, staff accountability, and local commitment. Our process of identifying implementation strategies was simple, low cost, and potentially replicable to other settings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0420-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An Engineered Endomorphin-2 Gene for Morphine Withdrawal Syndrome

An optimal therapeutics to manage opioid withdrawal syndrome is desired for opioid addiction treatment. Down-regulation of endogenous endomorphin-2 (EM2) level in the central nervous system after continuous morphine exposure was observed, which suggested that increase of EM2 could be an alternative novel method for opioid dependence. As a short peptide, the short half-life of EM2 limits its clinical usage through conventional administration. In the present study, we engineered an EM2 gene using a signal peptide of mouse growth factor for an out-secretory expression of EM2 and an adenovirus as a vector, which ultimately sustained the release of EM-2. After administration of the adenovirus in central nervous system, a sustained increase of EM2 level in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) was observed along with a reduction of morphine withdrawal syndrome. These findings suggest that the engineered EM2 gene delivered to the central nervous system could be a novel therapeutics for withdrawal syndrome in opioid dependent subjects.

Drug-Drug Interactions With Antiviral Agents in People Who Inject Drugs Requiring Substitution Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To describe potential drug-drug interactions in the area of HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection and injection drug use, including those between antiretrovirals (ARVs), direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), and opioid-agonist therapy, and to supply a practical approach to their management.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed for relevant articles published up until February 2015 as well as conference reports and drug-drug-interaction Web sites.

DATA SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We used the following search terms: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction, opioid substitution, HIV, hepatitis and the individual names of the relevant agents of the following drug classes and the drug classes itself: reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, direct-acting antivirals, opioide, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics. Additional references were identified from a review of literature citations and drug-drug interaction Web sites. In our evaluation, we included German- and English-language studies and reports addressing drug-drug interactions between opioid agonist therapy and ARVs or DAAs.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pharmacokinetic data were available for all ARVs and DAAs except rilpivirine, indinavir, saquinavir, maraviroc, dolutegravir, and MK-8742 with buprenorphine as well as maraviroc with methadone Drug-drug interactions of potential clinical relevance are most likely to occur between opioid-replacement therapy and ARVs, particularly the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, efavirenz and nevirapine, and HIV protease inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Integrase inhibitors may be safely coadministered with opioid-replacement therapy. With respect to HCV DAAs, most currently approved and late-stage investigational agents do not have clinically significant interactions with opioid-replacement therapy. ARV and DAAs may interact with other drug classes commonly used in the opioid-dependent population, including benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and antipsychotics.

A review of pharmacological interactions between HIV or hepatitis C virus medications and opioid agonist therapy: implications and management for clinical practice

Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is expanding but when used concurrently, problematic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions may occur. Articles published from 1966 to 2012 in Medline were reviewed using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, HCV, HCV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, highly active antiretroviral therapy, drug interactions, methadone and buprenorphine. In addition, a review of abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings was conducted; selected reports were reviewed as well. The metabolism of both opioid and antiretroviral therapies, description of their known interactions and clinical implications and management of these interactions were reviewed. Important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions affecting either methadone or HIV medications have been demonstrated within each class of antiretroviral agents. Drug interactions between methadone, buprenorphine and HIV medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. Clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

Cytochrome P4503A does not mediate the interaction between methadone and ritonavir-lopinavir

Plasma concentrations of orally administered methadone are reduced by the human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor combination ritonavir and lopinavir, but the mechanism is unknown. Methadone metabolism, clearance, and drug interactions have been attributed to CYP3A4, but this remains controversial. This investigation assessed the effects of acute (2 days) and steady-state (2 weeks) ritonavir-lopinavir on intravenous and oral methadone metabolism and clearance, hepatic and intestinal CYP3A4/5 activity (using the probe substrate intravenous and oral alfentanil), and intestinal transporter activity (using oral fexofenadine) in healthy volunteers. Plasma and urine concentrations of methadone and metabolite enantiomers, and other analytes, were determined by mass spectrometry. Acute and chronic ritonavir-lopinavir reduced plasma methadone enantiomer concentrations in half, with an average 2.6- and 1.5-fold induction of systemic and apparent oral methadone clearances. Induction was attributable to stereoselectively increased hepatic methadone N-demethylation, hepatic extraction, and hepatic clearance, and there was a strong correlation between methadone N-demethylation and clearance. Methadone renal clearance was unchanged. Alfentanil's systemic clearance and hepatic extraction, apparent oral clearance, and intestinal extraction were reduced to 25%, 16%, and 35% of control, indicating strong inhibition of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A activities. Ritonavir-lopinavir (acute > chronic) increased fexofenadine exposure, suggesting intestinal P-glycoprotein inhibition. No correlation was found between methadone clearance and CYP3A activity. Acute and steady-state ritonavir-lopinavir stereoselectively induced methadone N-demethylation and clearance, despite significant inhibition of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A activity. Ritonavir-lopinavir inhibited intestinal transporters activity but had no effect on methadone bioavailability. These results do not support a significant role for CYP3A or ritonavir-lopinavir-inhibitable intestinal transporters in single-dose methadone disposition.

Methadone: a review of drug-drug and pathophysiological interactions

Numerous established and potential drug interactions with methadone are clinically important in people treated with methadone either for addiction or for chronic pain. Methadone users often have comorbidities and are prescribed drugs that may interact with methadone. Methadone is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP 1A2, 2D6, 2D8, 2C9/2C8, 2C19, and 2B6. Eighty-six percent of methadone is protein bound, predominately to α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP). Polymorphisms in or interactions with CYPs that metabolize methadone, changes in protein binding, and other pathophysiological conditions affect the pharmacokinetic properties of methadone. It is critical for health care providers who treat patients on methadone to have adequate information on the interactions of methadone with other drugs of abuse and other medications. We set out to describe drug-drug interactions as well as physiological and pathophysiological factors that may impact the pharmacokinetics of methadone. Using MEDLINE, we conducted a systematic search for papers and related abstracts published between 1966 and June 2010. Keywords that included methadone, drug-drug interactions, CYP P450 and AGP identified a total of 7709 papers. Other databases, including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus, were also searched; an additional 929 papers were found. Final selection of 286 publications was based on the relevance of each paper to the topic. Over 50 such interactions were found. Interactions of methadone with other drugs can lead to increased or decreased methadone drug levels in patients and result in potential overdose or withdrawal, respectively. The former can contribute to methadone's fatality. Prescribers of methadone and pharmacists should enquire about any new medications (including natural products and over-the-counter medications) periodically, and especially when an otherwise stable patient suddenly experiences drug craving, withdrawal or intoxication.

Strategies to improve access to and utilization of health care services and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected drug users

We review five innovative strategies to improve access, utilization, and adherence for HIV-infected drug users and suggest areas that need further attention. In addition, we highlight two innovative programs. The first increases access and utilization through integrated HIV and opioid addiction treatment with buprenorphine in a community health center, and the second incorporates adherence counseling for antiretroviral therapy in methadone programs. Preliminary evaluations demonstrated that these strategies may improve both HIV and opioid addiction outcomes and may be appropriate for wider dissemination. Further refinement and expansion of strategies to improve outcomes of HIV-infected drug users is warranted.

Mechanism of ritonavir changes in methadone pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: I. Evidence against CYP3A mediation of methadone clearance

Ritonavir diminishes methadone plasma concentrations, an effect attributed to CYP3A induction, but the actual mechanisms are unknown. We determined ritonavir effects on stereoselective methadone pharmacokinetics and clinical effects (pupillary miosis) in healthy human immunodeficiency virus-negative volunteers. Subjects received intravenous plus oral (deuterium-labeled) racemic methadone after no ritonavir, short-term (3-day) ritonavir, and steady-state ritonavir. Acute and steady-state ritonavir, respectively, caused 1.5- and 2-fold induction of systemic and apparent oral R- and S-methadone clearances. Ritonavir increased renal clearance 40-50%, and stereoselectively (S > R) increased hepatic methadone N-demethylation 50-80%, extraction twofold, and clearance twofold. Bioavailability was unchanged despite significant inhibition of intestinal P-glycoprotein. Intestinal and hepatic CYP3A was inhibited > 70%. Ritonavir shifted methadone plasma concentration-miosis curves leftward and upward. Rapid ritonavir induction of methadone clearance results from increased renal clearance and induced hepatic metabolism. Induction of methadone metabolism occurred despite profound CYP3A inhibition, suggesting no role for CYP3A in clinical methadone metabolism and clearance. Ritonavir may alter methadone pharmacodynamics.

Co-infections and co-therapies: treatment of HIV in the presence of hepatitis C and hepatitis B

An increasing number of people are chronically infected with HIV and HCV, and/or HBV owing to shared routes of transmission. With the advent of HAART, liver disease secondary to hepatitis co-infections has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected persons. There is increasing need to manage dual infection, but treatment is complicated by co-morbidities, overlapping toxicities, drug activities and resistance. A model of treatment that builds on the lessons learned from the treatment of HIV has evolved to maximize success of treating dual infections. This review will address current strategies for the management of HIV in the setting of HCV and HBV co-infection and discuss future treatment directions and challenges.

Treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women: clinical and research issues

This article addresses common questions that clinicians face when treating pregnant women with opioid dependence. Guidance, based on both research evidence and the collective clinical experience of the authors, which include investigators in the Maternal Opioid Treatment: Human Experimental Research (MOTHER) project, is provided to aid clinical decision making. The MOTHER project is a double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dosing, parallel-group clinical trial examining the comparative safety and efficacy of methadone and buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence in pregnant women and their neonates. The article begins with a discussion of appropriate assessment during pregnancy and then addresses clinical management stages including maintenance medication selection, induction, and stabilization; opioid agonist medication management before, during, and after delivery; pain management; breast-feeding; and transfer to aftercare. Lastly, other important clinical issues including managing co-occurring psychiatric disorders and medication interactions are discussed.

Induction effects of ritonavir: implications for drug interactions

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the induction effects of ritonavir on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system and glucuronyl transferase and identify resultant established and potential drug interactions.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature was identified from MEDLINE (1950-April 2008), EMBASE (1988-April 2008) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 2008) using the search terms ritonavir, cytochrome P450 enzyme system, enzyme induction, glucuronyl transferase, and drug interactions. Additionally, relevant conference abstracts and references of relevant articles were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA ABSTRACTION

All English-language articles and abstracts identified were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ritonavir is a well-known inhibitor of the metabolism of numerous medications that are substrates of the CYP3A and CYP2D6 pathways. It also exhibits a biphasic, time-dependent effect on P-glycoprotein of inhibition followed by induction. Numerous pharmacokinetic studies suggested that ritonavir induces cytochrome P450 enzymes 3A, 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, and 2C19, as well as glucuronyl transferase. Additionally, several case reports described clinically significant subtherapeutic effects of drugs metabolized by these isoenzymes when coadministered with ritonavir. Both therapeutic and boosting doses of ritonavir appear to induce these enzymes; however, most of the studies of low-dose ritonavir involved a second protease inhibitor such as lopinavir, darunavir, or tipranavir. It is, therefore, difficult to distinguish the relative effects of additional medications unless well-designed, 3-way studies are conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

At both therapeutic and boosting doses, ritonavir exhibits a clinically relevant induction effect on numerous drug-metabolizing enzymes. A decrease or loss of therapeutic effect may be observed when ritonavir is coadministered with medications that are substrates for these enzymes. It is important for clinicians to be aware of drugs potentially impacted by ritonavir therapy to identify and manage these interactions.

Actual and potential drug interactions associated with methadone

OBJECTIVE

To identify and characterize methadone-related drug interactions, as well as factors accounting for the variability in manifesting these interactions clinically.

DESIGN

Systematic review of the primary literature.

METHODS

Over 200 articles, reports of clinical trials, and case reports were reviewed. Studies and case reports were included if they revealed either quantitative or qualitative methods to identify, evaluate severity of, or compare methadone-related drug interactions.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

The evidence base associated with methadone drug interactions is underdeveloped in general, as the majority of references found were case reports or case series. Most of the studies and reports focused on inpatients receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) that were between 20 and 60 years of age, taking 200 mg/day of methadone or less. Evidence supporting the involvement of lesser known cytochrome P450 enzymes such as 2B6 is emerging, which may partially explain the inconsistencies previously found in studies looking specifically at 3A4 in vitro and in vivo. Genetic variability may play a role in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many medications, including methadone.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug interactions associated with methadone and their clinical significance are still poorly understood in general. Many tertiary drug information references and review articles report interactions associated with methadone in a general sense, much of which is theoretical and not verified by case reports, much less well-designed clinical trials. The majority of drug interaction reports that do exist were performed in the MMT population, which may differ significantly from chronic pain or cancer pain populations.

Methadone dosing strategies in HIV-infected injection drug users enrolled in a directly observed therapy program

OBJECTIVES

We have measured methadone dose adjustments and treatment responses after nevirapine (NVP)-, efavirenz (EFV)-, ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r), or atazanavir (ATV; with or without ritonavir)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was initiated in injection drug users (IDUs).

METHODS

We identified 120 IDUs receiving HAART and methadone within a directly observed therapy (DOT) program. Follow-up was according to clinical standards, with changes in methadone dose being made as required to achieve clinical stabilization within the first 3 months of HAART.

RESULTS

The observed median methadone dose changes from baseline were 20 mg/d (P<0.001) in patients on NVP, with 32 (86%) of 37 patients requiring daily dose increases, and 7.5 mg/d (P=0.004) in patients on EFV, with 11 (61%) of 18 patients requiring daily dose increases. Conversely, median changes were 0 mg/d for patients on LPV/r (P=0.56) or ATV (P=0.95). Virologic suppression (HIV RNA<400 copies/mL) was achieved in 26 (70%) of 37, 12 (67%) of 18, 25 (76%) of 33, and 24 (75%) of 32 patients receiving NVP-, EFV-, LPV/r-, and ATV-based regimens, respectively (P=0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Although methadone-based DOT can be a successful tool for the coadministration of HAART, careful monitoring is required to ensure that methadone withdrawal does not adversely affect the goals of treatment, particularly when nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are used.

Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection

Coformulated lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) is a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) containing lopinavir and low-dose ritonavir. It is approved for use in combination with other antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV infection in adults, adolescents and children aged >or=6 months (in the US) or >or=2 years (in the EU).Lopinavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is generally well tolerated and has shown durable virological efficacy in clinical trials in ART-naive and -experienced patients with virological failure. Lopinavir/ritonavir is one of the preferred PIs for first-line treatment of HIV infection in adults, adolescents and children, according to US and British guidelines, reflecting its comparatively better virological efficacy than nelfinavir and low incidence of de novo resistance during long-term treatment. Lopinavir/ritonavir-based treatment may produce a more effective virological response than other PI-based regimens in single PI-experienced, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients. In PI- and NNRTI-experienced patients, atazanavir/saquinavir was inferior to lopinavir/ritonavir; further well designed trials are required to determine the comparative efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir versus other PIs such as ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, or fosamprenavir or tipranavir in these patients. Lopinavir/ritonavir is more likely than atazanavir (alone or boosted) or nelfinavir to cause hypertriglyceridaemia and is associated with a higher incidence of hypercholesterolaemia than atazanavir (alone or boosted). The new lopinavir/ritonavir tablet coformulation offers a reduced pill count and lack of food interaction, and ART-naive patients in the US and Canada, who are not receiving efavirenz, nelfinavir, nevirapine or amprenavir, may benefit from convenient once-daily administration of lopinavir/ritonavir. Thus, lopinavir/ritonavir is a convenient, effective option for use in the treatment of HIV infection in ART-naive and -experienced adults, adolescents and children.

Lopinavir/ritonavir induces the hepatic activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2 but inhibits the hepatic and intestinal activity of CYP3A as measured by a phenotyping drug cocktail in healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE

The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) administration on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activity was quantified using a phenotyping biomarker cocktail. Changes in CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A, CYP1A2, N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT-2), and xanthine oxidase (XO) activities were evaluated using warfarin (WARF) + vitamin K, omeprazole (OMP), intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) midazolam (MDZ), and caffeine (CAF).

DESIGN

: Open-label, multiple-dose, pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Subjects (n = 14) simultaneously received PO WARF 10 mg, vitamin K 10 mg, OMP 40 mg, CAF 2 mg/kg, and IV MDZ 0.025 mg/kg on days (D) 1 and 14, and PO MDZ 5 mg on D2 and D15. LPV/r (400/100 mg twice daily) was administered on D4-17. CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 activities were quantified by S-WARF AUC0-inf and OMP/5-hydroxy OMP ratio, respectively. CYP1A2, NAT-2, and XO activities were quantified by urinary CAF metabolite ratios. Hepatic and intestinal + hepatic CYP3A activities were quantified by IV (CL) and PO (CL/F) MDZ clearance, respectively.

RESULTS

After LPV/r therapy, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP1A2 activity increased by 29%, 100%, and 43% (P = 0.001, 0.046, and 0.001), respectively. No changes were seen in NAT-2 or XO activity. Hepatic and intestinal + hepatic CYP3A activity decreased by 77% (P < 0.001) and 92% (P = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

LPV/r therapy results in modest induction of CYP1A2 and CYP2C9 and potent induction of CYP2C19 activity. Increasing doses of concomitant medications metabolized by these enzymes may be necessary. LPV/r inhibited intestinal CYP3A to a greater extent than hepatic CYP3A activity. Doses of concomitant CYP3A substrates should be reduced when combined with LPV/r, although intravenously administered compounds may require less of a relative dose reduction than orally administered compounds.

Interacciones clínicas y farmacocinéticas entre metadona y nelfinavir (estudio Nemesia)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients on methadone maintenance therapy who are administered nelfinavir show a decrease in methadone plasma levels. However, the clinical relevance of this fact is seldom significant because it does not correlate with the appearance of opioid withdrawal symptoms (OWS). The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and pharmacokinetic interactions between methadone and nelfinavir.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A prospective multicenter study of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients on stable methadone therapy who initiated nelfinavir was performed. To determine the presence of OWS, 2 questionnaires, objective and subjective, were administered at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. A pharmacokinetic study measuring the minimal plasmatic concentration of methadone was done at baseline and at week 4.

RESULTS

29 patient were included. In 7 patients who underwent pharmacokinetic studies, the minimal plasmatic concentration of methadone decreased after 4 weeks of nelfinavir treatment from 6.889 ng/ml to 4.354 ng/ml (37%; p = 0.046). However the results of the questionnaires did not show the significant OWS, which precluded an increase in the dose of methadone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients under stable methadone treatment, antiretroviral therapy including nelfinavir does not require any significant modification of methadone dose. The decrease in methadone plasmatic levels does not correlate with OWS.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between opioid agonist therapy and antiretroviral medications: implications and management for clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Opioid dependence and HIV/AIDS are 2 of the most serious yet treatable diseases worldwide. Global access to opioid agonist therapy and HIV treatment is expanding but when concurrently used, problematic pharmacokinetic drug interactions can occur.

METHODS

We reviewed English, Spanish, French, and Italian language articles from 1966 to 2005 in Medline using the following keywords: HIV, AIDS, HIV therapy, antiretroviral therapy, HAART, drug interactions, methadone, and buprenorphine. Additionally, we reviewed abstracts from national and international meetings and conference proceedings. Selected references from these articles were reviewed as well.

RESULTS

Clinical case series and carefully controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies have been conducted between methadone and most approved antiretroviral therapies. Important pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been demonstrated within each class of agents, affecting either methadone or antiretroviral agents. Few studies, however, have been conducted with buprenorphine. The metabolism of both therapies, description of the known interactions, and clinical implications and management of these interactions are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain interactions between methadone and antiretroviral medications are known and may have important clinical consequences. To optimize care, clinicians must be alert to these interactions and have a basic knowledge regarding their management.

Lack of an effect of atazanavir on steady-state pharmacokinetics of methadone in patients chronically treated for opiate addiction

BACKGROUND

Effective antiretroviral treatment of opiate-addicted drug users with HIV infection often requires concomitant substance abuse treatment, commonly with methadone. Pharmacological interactions between antiretroviral drugs and methadone may result in opiate withdrawal or increased side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if atazanavir, a once-daily protease inhibitor and moderate inhibitor of P450 CYP3A4, exhibited pharmacokinetic interactions with (R)-methadone.

METHODS

Methadone pharmacokinetic parameters were measured in 16 patients on chronic methadone therapy prior to and after 14 days of daily administration of atazanavir. Steady-state pharmacokinetic values for total, (R)- (active) and (S)- (inactive) isomers of methadone were derived from plasma concentrations versus time data. Symptoms of opiate withdrawal and excess were monitored.

RESULTS

For the active isomer (R)-methadone, the ratio of geometric means for coadministration with atazanavir relative to methadone alone were 1.03 [90% confidence interval (CI), 0.95-1.10] for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), 0.91 (90% CI, 0.84-1.00) for plasma maximal concentration and 1.11 (90% CI, 1.02-1.20) for plasma trough concentration. Confidence intervals for all three were within the no-effect or bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25 for (R)-methadone. Inactive (S)-methadone was modestly reduced during atazanavir coadministration. Clinically relevant symptoms of opiate withdrawal or excess were not detected. Exposures to atazanavir were within range of previously reported values.

CONCLUSIONS

No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were found between atazanavir and methadone. Dosage adjustment need not be recommended for either methadone or atazanavir when co-administered to patients treated for opiate abuse and HIV disease.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers After Coadministration with Amprenavir in Opioid-Dependent Subjects

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of methadone enantiomers when coadministered with amprenavir.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, within-subject pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

University research center.

SUBJECTS

Nineteen opioid-dependent, methadone-maintained, healthy individuals were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

On study day 1, subjects received their usual once-daily dose of methadone alone. On study days 2-11, they received the same once-daily methadone dose plus amprenavir 1200 mg twice/day. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours on study days 1 and 11 for measurement of plasma R- and S-methadone, and over 12 hours on day 11 for serum amprenavir concentrations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the concentrations and compared between the two treatments (methadone alone vs methadone with amprenavir). Subjects served as their own control for methadone comparisons, and amprenavir comparisons were made by using a historic control group (38 healthy men). Opioid-effect measures were assessed throughout the study. Coadministration of amprenavir with methadone resulted in a 3-4-hour delay in plasma R- and S-methadone enantiomer peak concentrations at steady state (Cmax-ss). The active R-methadone enantiomer area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval (AUCt-ss, Cmax-ss, and the minimum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmin-ss) were decreased by 13%, 25%, and 21%, respectively, after coadministration of methadone and amprenavir. The inactive S-enantiomer AUCt-ss, Cmax-ss, and Cmin-ss were decreased by 40%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. No clinically significant changes were noted in opioid pharmacodynamic effects, and there was no evidence of opioid withdrawal. No methadone dosage was changed in any subject.

CONCLUSION

No a priori adjustment in methadone dosage is required during coadministration with amprenavir as there is only a small effect on R-methadone exposure and no evidence of opioid withdrawal.

Practical considerations for the clinical use of buprenorphine

Buprenorphine is a new and attractive medication option for many opioid-addicted adults and their physicians. Before initiating buprenorphine treatment, providers must be aware of such critical factors as how the medication works, its efficacy and safety profile, how it is used in opioid withdrawal as well as maintenance treatment, and how patients can best be selected, educated about buprenorphine, and monitored throughout treatment. This article reviews these important issues as well as requirements for physician and staff training and needs for additional research on this unique medication.

Effect of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Total, R-, and S-Methadone

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) on the pharmacokinetics of methadone.

DESIGN

Phase I, open-label, fixed-sequence, pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study.

SETTING

Clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen volunteers receiving stable methadone maintenance therapy who were not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

INTERVENTION

Tenofovir DF was added to the subjects' methadone regimens.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of total, R-, and S-methadone were evaluated at baseline and after 2 weeks of daily tenofovir DF coadministration with a light meal. Steady-state tenofovir DF pharmacokinetics were evaluated at day 15. Bioequivalence testing was conducted of total, R-, and S-methadone area under the serum or plasma concentration-time curve during the 24-hour dosing interval at steady state (AUCss) and maximum concentration in serum or plasma (Cmax). Subjects were evaluated for changes in methadone pharmacodynamics by the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) and pupillary diameter measurements at frequent intervals. Coadministration with tenofovir DF did not affect the pharmacokinetics of methadone. Geometric mean R-methadone systemic exposures, AUCss and Cmax, differed by 5% or less when methadone was dosed with tenofovir DF. Similar results were observed for S-methadone and for total methadone. Both AUCss and Cmax met the strict criteria for bioequivalence between the two study periods for total, R-, and S-methadone, indicating a lack of drug interaction when tenofovir DF was coadministered with methadone. No significant changes in SOWS scores or pupillary diameter measurements occurred, and no notable clinical adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Tenofovir DF pharmacokinetics were comparable to previously reported values of tenofovir DF in HIV-infected patients. Coadministration of methadone with tenofovir DF did not alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of total, R-, or S-methadone. Tenofovir DF may be given as part of a once-daily antiretroviral regimen in patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy.