Why the transdermal delivery of selegiline (6 mg/24 hr) obviates the need for a dietary restriction on tyramine

How to Optimize the Effectiveness and Safety of Parkinson's Disease Therapy? - A Systematic Review of Drugs Interactions with Food and Dietary Supplements

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing worldwide incidence of Parkinson's disease, the therapy is still suboptimal due to the diversified clinical manifestations, lack of sufficient treatment, the poor adherence in advanced patients, and varied response. Proper intake of medications regarding food and managing drug-food interactions may optimize Parkinson's disease treatment.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated potential effects that food, beverages, and dietary supplements may have on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used by parkinsonian patients; identified the most probable interactions; and shaped recommendations for the optimal intake of drugs regarding food.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and included a total of 81 studies in the qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We found evidence for levodopa positive interaction with coffee, fiber and vitamin C, as well as for the potential beneficial impact of low-fat and protein redistribution diet. Contrastingly, high-protein diet and ferrous sulfate supplements can negatively affect levodopa pharmacokinetics and effectiveness. For other drugs, the data of food impact are scarce. Based on the available limited evidence, all dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline, ropinirole), tolcapone, rasagiline, selegiline in tablets, safinamide, amantadine and pimavanserin can be taken with or without a meal. Opicapone and orally disintegrating selegiline tablets should be administered on an empty stomach. Of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, safinamide is the least susceptible for interaction with the tyramine-rich food, whereas selegiline and rasagiline may lose selectivity to monoamine oxidase B when administered in supratherapeutic doses. The level of presented evidence is low due to the poor studies design, their insufficient actuality, and missing data.

CNS Drug Development: Lessons Learned Part 3: Psychiatric and Central Nervous System Drugs Developed Over the Last Decade-Implications for the Field

This column reviews the divergence between the approach to drug development in infectious disease, oncology, and immunology versus psychiatry. Between 2009 and 2016, 254 new drugs were approved. Of those, only 9 were for a psychiatric indication; another 5 were labeled to treat central nervous system disorders that are not considered psychiatric per se but are frequently found in individuals with psychiatric illnesses (eg, substantial weight gain). There were 2 additional new products for psychiatric indications that involved either a combination product (Contrave) or a prodrug for the production of aripiprazole (Aristada). The column discusses the reasons behind these different rates of development of psychiatric and/or central nervous system drugs compared with drugs in the areas of infectious disease, oncology, and immunology, and it predicts that this situation will change over the next century as we develop an improved understanding of the neurobiology underlying specific psychiatric illnesses.

Efficacy and safety of selegiline transdermal system (STS) for the atypical subtype of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of 5 short-term, placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of the selegiline transdermal system (STS) in major depressive disorder (MDD) with atypical features.

METHODS

This was a post-hoc analysis of 5 short-term trials. The atypical subtype was defined as the presence of at least 1 item with a score of 2 or greater from items 22-26 on the 28-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-28), and a maximum score of 1 point for items 6 (insomnia late), 12 (somatic symptoms, gastrointestinal), and 16 (loss of weight) to exclude vegetative features of melancholic depression. The mean changes of HAMD-28 total score from baseline to the endpoint (response rate defined as ≥50% reduction in HAMD-28 scores and remission rate defined as ≤10 HAMD-28 total score at the treatment endpoint) were compared between atypical and nonatypical groups.

RESULTS

In this analysis, 352 subjects (STS = 168 vs placebo = 184) met the definition of atypical subtype at baseline. STS (n = 641) significantly decreased HAMD-28 total score compared with placebo (n = 648) from beginning to end of treatment (-10.7 ± 9.3 vs -9.4 ± 9.3; p = 0.014). STS showed comparable efficacy in patients with the atypical subtype compared with the nonatypical subtype for placebo-subtracted mean change in HAMD-28 total score (-2.11 ± 1.01 vs. -1.0 ± 0.60; p = 0.34), odds ratio (OR) for response (1.41 vs 1.23, p = 0.62), and OR for remission (1.77 vs 1.18, p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

STS appears to be comparably efficacious and tolerable in atypical and nonatypical subtypes of MDD. Adequately powered, controlled, clinical trials are necessary to confirm our findings.

Placing transdermal selegiline for major depressive disorder into clinical context: number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed

BACKGROUND

This is a quantitative review of existing studies of transdermal selegiline for major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Data for dichotomous outcomes were extracted from the five 6-8 week studies of transdermal selegiline. Number needed to treat (NNT) vs. placebo was calculated for response and remission using standard definitions. Number needed to harm (NNH) vs. placebo for commonly encountered adverse events (AEs), AEs associated with sexual function, incidence of weight gain ≥5% from baseline, and discontinuation due to an AE, were also calculated. Data was pooled as appropriate and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) ratios contrasting remission with selected tolerability outcomes were determined.

RESULTS

When pooling together the two pivotal trials as identified in product labeling, NNT for response was 11 (95% CI 6-109) and for remission, 9 (95% CI 6-28). Pooling all trials, NNH for application site reaction was 7 (95% CI 6-10) and for insomnia, 19 (95% CI 12-41). There were no clinically relevant differences from placebo regarding weight gain or impairment in sexual functioning. NNH for discontinuation due to an AE was 32 (95% CI 19-132). LHH for remission vs. discontinuation from treatment due to an AE was 3.6.

LIMITATIONS

The studies included were not identical in design. The studies were registrational in nature and thus not necessarily generalizable.

CONCLUSIONS

NNT for transdermal selegiline for efficacy is similar to that for other antidepressant regimens for which similar analyses have been published. There appear to be no clinically relevant effects of selegiline on weight or sexual functioning.

Reducing the Burden of Difficult-to-Treat Major Depressive Disorder: Revisiting Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor Therapy

OBJECTIVE

Difficult-to-treat depression (eg, depression with atypical or anxious symptoms, treatment-resistant depression, or depression with frequent recurrence) is a challenging real-world health issue. This critical review of the literature focuses on monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) therapy and difficult-to-treat forms of depression.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed in November 2012 and refreshed through January 2013 with no date restrictions using key search terms including MAO inhibitor therapy or MAOI and depression and anxiety, atypical, treatment-resistant, recurrent, relapse, or refractory.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were selected to summarize the current needs in difficult-to-treat depression as well as the use of MAOI therapies in this area.

RESULTS

Two strategies have fallen out of favor in the care of patients with major depressive disorder. The first is the use of MAOI therapy and the second is the proactive recognition of difficult-to-treat depression that may not respond as well to more frequently used antidepressants. The infrequent use of MAOIs stems from the perception that other oral therapies for depression are safer and easier to use than oral MAOIs; however, transdermal delivery is one potential strategy to improve the safety of this class of agents. Although food-related interactions with transdermal delivery of MAOI therapy can be lessened, clinicians still need to be vigilant for drug-drug interactions and serotonin syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should consider MAOIs for patients who have had several unsuccessful trials of antidepressants. Guidelines generally reserve MAOIs as third- and fourth-line treatments due to concerns over safety and tolerability; however, transdermal delivery of an MAOI may allay some of the safety and tolerability concerns. Patients should be provided education about MAOIs and their risks.

Transtelephonic home blood pressure to assess the monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor rasagiline in Parkinson disease

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are associated with dietary tyramine interactions that can induce hypertensive crises. Rasagiline mesylate is a novel irreversible selective monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor for Parkinson disease that may have a low risk of interaction with dietary tyramine because of its selectivity. To study interactions of rasagiline with diets unrestricted in tyramine-containing foods, we incorporated transtelephonic, self-monitoring of the blood pressure (BP) into a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rasagiline 0.5 and 1.0 mg daily in 414 levodopa-treated Parkinson patients with motor fluctuations. The proportion of patients with a systolic BP increase of >30 mm Hg was the primary BP end point. In 13 968 self-measured readings at baseline, the proportion of systolic BP values that increased by >30 mm Hg after a meal ranged from 9.5% to 12.9% in the 3 treatment groups. In 25 733 BPs obtained postrandomization, the proportion of values with a >30-mm Hg systolic postprandial increase was 15% in the placebo group, 15% in the rasagiline 0.5-mg group, and 11% in the rasagiline 1-mg group after 3 weeks of double-blind therapy and 13%, 14%, and 12%, respectively, after 26 weeks of treatment (P value was not significant for all of the comparisons among treatment groups). A postprandial increase in systolic BP to >180 mm Hg at any time after randomization was seen in 3.3%, 2.6%, and 2.9% of the placebo, 0.5-mg, and 1.0-mg rasagiline groups, respectively. These data demonstrate that rasagiline did not induce postprandial hypertension in patients with Parkinson disease who were on an unrestricted diet.

Selegiline transdermal system: in the treatment of major depressive disorder

The monamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor selegiline is selective for MAO-B at the low oral dosages used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. However, MAO-A is also inhibited at the high oral dosages needed to effectively treat depression (not an approved indication), necessitating a tyramine-restricted diet. The selegiline transdermal system was designed to deliver antidepressant drug concentrations to the CNS, without substantially impairing small intestine MAO-A activity. At the target dose of 6 mg/24 hours, tyramine dietary restrictions are not needed. Short-term treatment with fixed (6 mg/24 hours) or flexible (6, 9 or 12 mg/24 hours) doses of selegiline transdermal system was superior to placebo on most measures of antidepressant activity in 6- or 8-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre studies in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Likewise, long-term treatment with a fixed dose of selegiline transdermal system 6 mg/24 hours was superior to placebo as maintenance therapy in a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, relapse-prevention trial in patients with MDD. Selegiline transdermal system therapy was generally well tolerated in placebo-controlled studies; application site reactions, mostly of mild to moderate severity, were the most commonly reported adverse events. The incidence of sexual adverse effects and weight gain was low and similar to that with placebo.