Demographics and trends in nonoperating-room anesthesia

Pediatric Deep Sedation for Ophthalmology Procedures in an Outpatient Setting, Risk Evaluation

Background:

Pediatric deep sedation (PDS) performed by a dedicated pediatric sedation service has been found to be safe, convenient, and efficient for minor procedures. Major complications such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, and death are rare. However, minor complications such as desaturation, apnea, suctioning, or laryngospasm can occur infrequently. To date, little data exist evaluating PDS use for minor ophthalmology procedures.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of complications for subjects receiving PDS for minor ophthalmology procedures.

Setting:

Pediatric children's hospital sedation service.

Materials and Methods:

This was a review of a prospectively collected database between 2018 and 2020. A hundred and thirty-four subjects aged 0–18 years, who underwent PDS for minor ophthalmology procedures, were compared to 1119 subjects who received PDS for other procedures (e.g., lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspirate/biopsy, and Botox).

Statistical Analysis:

SAS software, version 9.4, was used to determine variables associated with deep sedation that were predictive of complications. A multiple logistic regression procedure was conducted. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 level.

Results:

Subjects receiving PDS for ophthalmology procedures had a higher rate of minor complications than the control group (n = 18, 13.4%, vs. n = 58, 5.7%; P < 0001). No major complications occurred in any of the studied subjects. The ophthalmology group had a higher rate of bag-mask ventilation, airway positioning, and suctioning.

Conclusions:

Ophthalmology procedures using PDS have a greater occurrence of minor complications compared to other painful procedures. No major complications were noted in either group, providing evidence that PDS can be performed safely for ophthalmology procedures using the sedation team model.

Severe outcomes of pediatric perioperative adverse events occurring in operating rooms compared to off-site anesthetizing locations in the Wake Up Safe Database

BACKGROUND

Anesthesia services are frequently provided outside of the traditional operating room environment for children. It is unclear if adverse events which occur in off-site anesthetizing locations result in more severe outcomes compared to events in traditional operating rooms.

AIM

We used a multi-institutional registry of pediatric patients to compare outcomes of perioperative adverse events between location types.

METHODS

De-identified data from 24 pediatric tertiary care hospitals participating in the Wake Up Safe registry during 2010-2015 were analyzed. Peri-procedural adverse events occurring in operating rooms or off-site locations were included. The primary outcome was whether the adverse event was severe, defined as requiring escalation of care or resulting in temporary or significant harm. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare location type (operating room vs. off-site) and the likelihood of a severe outcome among reported events.

RESULTS

There were 1594 adverse events, of which 362 were associated with off-site anesthetizing locations. In multivariable logistic regression, off-site location was associated with greater odds of severe adverse event outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.69; P = 0.044). Comparing adverse events in cardiac catheterization suites to events in operating rooms confirmed higher odds of severe outcome in the former group (adjusted odds ratio = 1.48; 95% confidence interval: 1.05, 2.08; P = 0.025), while this difference was not found for other off-site locations.

CONCLUSION

Multivariable analysis of a large registry revealed a greater likelihood of severe outcome for adverse events occurring in cardiac catheterization suites (but not other out of the OR sites), compared to adverse events occurring in the operating room. Additional prospective studies are needed which better control for patient and environmental characteristics and their effect on severe outcomes after anesthesia.

Successful Development and Implementation of Pediatric Sedation-Analgesia Curriculum for Residents

Pediatric residency graduates are increasingly asked to provide procedural sedations. Currently, most programs provide minimal exposure to residents outside of PICU for procedural sedations. We describe the pediatric sedation and analgesia (PSA) evolution and resident experience over the past 6 years at our institution (fiscal year 2010-2015). Administrative database of the PSA team and resident evaluations obtained by respective residency programs were analyzed and presented with standard descriptive analysis. Commutative or where appropriate year-by-year data were analyzed. Over the past 6 years, 100 residents performed 1,742 sedations with 17 ± 6.4 sedations per resident. Lumbar puncture and MRI were the most frequent procedures for sedations performed by residents. There was no statistical difference in complication rates in sedations performed by residents (28.6 ± 16.6) versus those by attending only (36.2 ± 31.2). Overall, residents were satisfied with the educational experience with an average score of 6.1 ± 0.17 out of maximum 7. Resident involvement in PSA is well liked by residents and does not lead to an increase in sedation-related complications.

Complications of Deep Sedation for Individual Procedures (Lumbar Puncture Alone) Versus Combined Procedures (Lumbar Puncture and Bone Marrow Aspirate) in Pediatric Oncology Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pediatric oncology patients frequently undergo procedural sedation. The goal of this study was to determine the safety of combining procedures into a single sedation encounter and to assess if the magnitude of any complication is significant enough to justify separate sedation encounters for multiple procedures.

METHODS

This retrospective review included pediatric oncology patients sedated for lumbar puncture alone or combined procedures (lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspirate) from January 2012 to January 2014. Demographic characteristics, medication dosing, procedural success, sedation duration, and adverse events (AEs) with associated required interventions were recorded. Sedation-related complications were separated into serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs. Data were analyzed by using multivariable modeling.

RESULTS

Data from 972 sedation encounters involving 96 patients, each having 1 to 28 encounters (mean±SD, 10±5), were reviewed. Ninety percent were individual procedures and 10% were combined procedures. Overall, there were few SAEs, and airway obstruction was the most common SAE. Combined procedures required 0.31 mg/kg more propofol (P<.001) and took 1.4 times longer (P<.001) than individual procedures. In addition, when adjusting for possible confounding factors, the odds of having an SAE were 4.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.37-16.65); P=.014) times higher for combined procedures. All SAEs and AEs were manageable by the sedation team.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining procedures was associated with higher propofol doses, prolonged duration, and a small increase in likelihood of SAEs compared with individual procedures. All AEs fell within the scope of management by the sedation team. Balancing the increased, but manageable, risks versus the advantages of family/patient convenience, enhanced resource utilization, and minimization of potential neurotoxicity from anesthetics supports combining procedures when possible.

Graph theoretical analysis of sedation's effect on whole brain functional system in school-aged children

The neurophysiological mechanism underlying sedation, especially in school-aged children, remains largely unknown. The recently emerged resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) technique, capable of delineating brain's functional interaction pattern among distributed brain areas, proves to be a unique and powerful tool to study sedation-induced brain reorganization. Based on a relatively large school-aged children population (n=28, 10.3±2.6 years, range 7-15 years) and leveraging rsfMRI and graph theoretical analysis, this study aims to delineate sedation-induced changes in brain's information transferring property from a whole brain system perspective. Our results show a global deterioration in brain's efficiency properties (p=0.0085 and 0.0018, for global and local efficiency, respectively) with a locally graded distribution featuring significant disruptions of key consciousness-related regions. Moreover, our results also indicate a redistribution of brain's information-processing hubs characterized by a right and posterior shift as consistent with the reduced level of consciousness during sedation. Overall, our findings inform a sedation-induced functional reorganization pattern in school-aged children that greatly improve our understanding of sedation's effect in children and may potentially serve as reference for future sedation-related experimental studies and clinical applications.

Impact of provider specialty on pediatric procedural sedation complication rates

OBJECTIVE

To determine if pediatric procedural sedation-provider medical specialty affects major complication rates when sedation-providers are part of an organized sedation service.

METHODS

The 38 self-selected members of the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium prospectively collected data under institutional review board approval. Demographic data, primary and coexisting illness, procedure, medications used, outcomes, airway interventions, provider specialty, and adverse events were reported on a self-audited, Web-based data collection tool. Major complications were defined as aspiration, death, cardiac arrest, unplanned hospital admission or level-of-care increase, or emergency anesthesia consultation. Event rates per 10 000 sedations, 95% confidence intervals, and odds ratios were calculated using anesthesiologists as the reference group and were then adjusted for age, emergency status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status > 2, nil per os for solids, propofol use, and clustering by site.

RESULTS

Between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2008, 131 751 pediatric procedural sedation cases were recorded; there were 122 major complications and no deaths. Major complication rates and 95% confidence intervals per 10 000 sedations were as follows: anesthesiologists, 7.6 (4.6-12.8); emergency medicine, 7.8 (5.5-11.2); intensivist, 9.6 (7.3-12.6); pediatrician, 12.4 (6.9-20.4); and other, 10.2 (5.1-18.3). There was no statistical difference (P > .05) among provider's complication rates before or after adjustment for potential confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In our sedation services consortium, pediatric procedural sedation performed outside the operating room is unlikely to yield serious adverse outcomes. Within this framework, no differences were evident in either the adjusted or unadjusted rates of major complications among different pediatric specialists.

Medical intelligence article: novel uses of high frequency ventilation outside the operating room

High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is a technique that is most frequently used in the intensive care unit and during tracheal and otorhinolaryngologic surgery. The utility of HFJV for procedures performed outside of the intensive care unit and operating room is currently being explored. The ability of HFJV to provide mechanical ventilation, yet achieve near static conditions of the chest and abdomen, makes it a very appealing technique for procedures such as pulmonary vein isolation and ablation for atrial fibrillation, targeted radiation therapy for lung and liver tumors, and certain diagnostic imaging techniques.

The 'dark' side of sedation: 12 years of office-based pediatric deep sedation for electroretinography in the dark

OBJECTIVES

Analyze pediatric ERG data for adverse events, interventions, and outcomes of propofol sedations performed in near-complete darkness.

AIM

To demonstrate that deep sedation with propofol for ERG can be performed efficiently and safely in children in near-total darkness.

BACKGROUND

Full-field electroretinography (ERG) is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of vision loss in children. The ERG measures the electrical activity of the retina. In children, ERG quality significantly improves with deep sedation by allowing easier eye electrode placement and decreasing motion artifacts. As this procedure must be performed in darkness, administering sedation imposes unique challenges.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

ERGs are performed outside of the operating room in our hospital's electrophysiology suite. IVs are placed, and patients are allowed to adapt to complete darkness. An anesthesiologist then administers propofol sedation in the dark with the aid of a red-filter light source and monitor light shields. Data were collected on 379 patients (411 ERGs) performed from 1996 to 2008. These records were reviewed and analyzed for demographic, medical, and anesthetic data.

RESULTS

Propofol sedation resulted in an ERG completion rate of 99.5%. During sedation, 8.5% (35) of patients experienced minor respiratory complications such as airway obstruction that resulted in an oxygen saturation <90%. A total of 9.7% (40) of patients required minor airway interventions such as a chin lift.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that pediatric sedation is a safe, efficient, and a cost-effective method for measuring ERGs in a challenging environment. The incidence of minor complications is low and appears similar to other studies of propofol sedation.

Intraoperative reported adverse events in children

BACKGROUND

Significant intraprocedural adverse events (AE) are reported in children who receive anesthesia for procedures outside the Operating Rooms (NORA). No study, so far, has characterized AE in children who receive anesthesia in the operating rooms (ORA) and NORA when anesthesia care is provided by the same team in a consistent manner.

OBJECTIVE/AIM

We used the same patient-specific Quality Assurance questionnaires (QAs), to elucidate incidences of intraoperative reported AE for children receiving anesthesia in NORA and ORA locations. Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, we assessed the association between patient's AE risk and procedure's location while adjusting for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, age, and unscheduled nature of the procedure.

METHODS/MATERIALS

After Institutional Review Board approval, we used returned QAs of patients under 21 years, who received anesthesia from our pediatric anesthesia faculty from May 1 2006 through September 30, 2007. We analyzed QA data on: service location, unscheduled/scheduled procedure, age, ASA status, presence, and type of AE. We excluded QAs with incomplete information on date, location, age, and ASA status.

RESULTS

We included 8707 cases, with 3.5% incidence of reported AE. We had 1898 NORA and 6808 ORA cases with AE incidence of 2.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that patients with higher ASA status or younger age had higher incidence of reported AE, irrespective of location or unscheduled nature of the procedure. The most common AE type, for both sites, was respiratory related (1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric reported AE incidence was comparable for NORA and ORA locations. Younger age or higher ASA status are associated with increased risk of AE.

The effects of multiple infusion line extensions on occlusion alarm function of an infusion pump

BACKGROUND

For anesthesia or conscious sedation of patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans, an extension of infusion lines for continuous drug delivery of anesthetics or vasopressors is often necessary. In this study, we tried to determine if the length of the infusion line influenced the time until an alarm sounded after occlusion at the end of the infusion line.

METHODS

We connected 2 infusion pump systems of the same model with 1, 2 or 3 infusion lines in series or with a spiral nonkinking low compliance infusion line, and started the infusion for 60 s. The end of the infusion line was then occluded by turning a stopcock to occlude the fluid flow. A pressure sensor was connected to the infusion line to record the actual pressure change in the line. The time until the pressure occlusion alarm sounded was measured 5 consecutive times at flow rates of 5, 20, and 50 mL/h.

RESULTS

When using a single infusion line, pressure occlusion alarms were triggered after 2.4 +/- 0.1 min for infusion pump 1 and 2.6 +/- 0.2 min for infusion pump 2 at 50 mL/h, after 6.6 +/- 0.4 min and 5.6 +/- 0.5 min at 20 mL/h, and after 23.0 +/- 2.8 min and 20.9 +/- 3.6 min at 5 mL/h, respectively. When adding a second infusion line, a pressure occlusion alarm was triggered after 27.1 +/- 1.8 min for infusion pump 1 (P = 0.1) and after 29.2 +/- 1.4 min for infusion pump 2 (P = 0.07) at 5 mL/h. With 3 infusion lines, the pressure occlusion alarm of infusion pumps 1 and 2 were significantly prolonged when compared with 1 infusion line and were released at 31.6 +/- 3.0 min (P = 0.01) and 35.1 +/- 1.1 min (P = 0.001) at 5 mL/h, respectively. The pressure level triggering an alarm ranged in both infusion pumps between about 900 and 1100 Mbar.

CONCLUSIONS

When simulating low flow rate infusions (5 mL/h) as for vasopressor support, occlusion alarm time was critically prolonged, especially with an increased length of infusion lines.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of patient-controlled sedation with propofol/remifentanil versus midazolam/fentanyl for colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol has been advocated as a method for dealing with the narrow therapeutic window for moderate sedation, but previous studies have methodologic limitations. We hypothesized that, by using remifentanil in conjunction with propofol and using PCS in both arms of the study, we could demonstrate marked improvements in facility use compared with fentanyl plus midazolam.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized (with concealed allocation) to midazolam/fentanyl (group MF) or propofol/remifentanil (group PR) administered via PCS. Time intervals for sedation and recovery, perceptions by patient, nurse, and gastroenterologist, and need for anesthesiologist intervention were assessed.

RESULTS

Group PR patients were sedated and recovered significantly more rapidly than did group MF (P < 0.0001). In the group PR, recovery room time was actually shorter than procedure room time. Patient, nurse, and gastroenterologist perceptions were equivalent between the groups. Two patients in group PR required anesthesiologist intervention for arterial desaturation exceeding the primary safety end point.

CONCLUSIONS

PCS with propofol/remifentanil yields superior facility throughput compared with midazolam/fentanyl when used in an appropriate care setting.

Anästhesie außerhalb des Zentral-OP

The number of diagnostic and surgical procedures being performed outside the core operating area is growing disproportionately. Due to the higher perioperative risk for such patients, anesthesia should only be provided by a very experienced anesthesiologist, even for supposedly small interventions. At these locations, timely and direct access to the anesthesia machine and/or the patient is often limited and if additional personnel or supplies are required, substantial time delays usually occur and should be allowed for. Standard operating procedures that are optimized to local requirements and providing a specially equipped anesthesia trolley for diagnostic and surgical procedures outside of the core operating area, may decrease the likelihood of complications induced by poorly equipped anesthesia workplaces. For electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the standard drugs are methohexital in combination with short-acting opioids, such as remifentanil and succinylcholine. Significant variations in arterial blood pressure and heart rate are possible. Anesthesia induction in children with a known difficult airway or difficult intravascular access should initially be performed in a location with optimal infrastructure with subsequent transfer to the diagnostic or surgical suite outside the core operating area. Before entering the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suite, personal ferromagnetic items (e.g. pens, credit cards, stethoscopes, keys, telephones, USB sticks) should be removed to prevent injury and data loss; a MRI-compatible anesthesia machine and equipment is compulsory. Patients with cardiac pacemakers, cochlea implants, aneurysm or other clips, metallic-based tattoos or make-up are not normally compatible with MRI. General anesthesia should be preferred over conscious sedation for magnetic resonance imaging and ear protection is necessary for anesthetized patients. Gastroscopy in children should be performed under general anesthesia; and when concluding the procedure, air insufflated into the gastrointestinal tract should be suctioned in all patients. For angiography, maximum monitoring needs to be available to provide hemodynamically unstable patients with adequate anesthesia care; comprehensive radiation protection for patients and staff as well as temperature monitoring for prolonged diagnostic procedures is also necessary. Monitoring oxygen saturation and end-tidal carbon dioxide as well as employing visual and audible alarms is an essential requirement even during conscious sedation. In summary, the number of diagnostic and surgical procedures performed outside the core operating area should be reduced to a minimum and, whenever possible, diagnostic or surgical procedures should be performed within the core operating area.