Lactulose Reduces Intracolonic Acetaldehyde Concentration and Ethanol Elimination Rate in Rats

Metabolic profiling of the impact of oligofructose-enriched inulin in Crohn's disease patients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES:

Although intestinal dysbiosis is well established in Crohn's disease (CD), little is known about the microbial metabolic activity of CD patients. In this study, we compared the metabolite patterns of the CD patients with profiles from healthy controls (HCs) and correlated them to disease activity and bacterial composition. In addition, the influence of the prebiotic oligofructose-enriched inulin (OF-IN) on the CD metabolites profile was evaluated.

METHODS:

Sixty-seven inactive and moderately active CD patients were included in a double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial (RCT). Patients consumed either 10 g OF-IN or 10 g placebo twice per day for 4 weeks. They collected a fecal sample before the start of the study (baseline) and after the treatment period. In addition, fecal samples were obtained from 40 HCs. The metabolite profile was assessed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.

RESULTS:

The number of fecal metabolites was significantly higher in HCs than in CD patients (P<0.001). Forty compounds differed between CD patients and HCs. When correlating the metabolite levels to disease activity, significantly lower levels of butyrate, pentanoate, hexanoate, heptanoate, and p-cresol were found in active patients as compared with HCs. In the RCT, no significant changes in the metabolite pattern were found in patients randomized to placebo. In patients receiving OF-IN (per protocol; n=21), the relative levels of acetaldehyde (P=0.0008) and butyrate (P=0.0011) were significantly increased as compared with baseline.

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified medium chain fatty acids and p-cresol as differentiating metabolites toward CD disease status and as compared with HCs. In addition, OF-IN intake primarily increased the carbohydrate fermentation metabolites butyrate and acetaldehyde.

Acetaldehyde as a common denominator and cumulative carcinogen in digestive tract cancers

The key issue in cancer prevention is the identification of specific aetiologic factors. Acetaldehyde, the first metabolite of ethanol oxidation, is carcinogenic in animals. ADH and ALDH2 gene mutations provide an exceptional human model to estimate the long-term effects of acetaldehyde exposure in man. These models provide strong evidence for the local carcinogenic potential of acetaldehyde also in humans. Ethanol is metabolized to acetaldehyde by both mucosal and microbial enzymes. Many microbes produce acetaldehyde from ethanol, but their capacity to eliminate acetaldehyde is low, which leads to the accumulation of acetaldehyde in saliva during an alcohol challenge. Acetaldehyde is the most abundant carcinogen in tobacco smoke, and it readily dissolves into saliva during smoking. Fermented food and many alcoholic beverages can also contain significant amounts of acetaldehyde. Thus acetaldehyde, derived from mucosal or microbial oxidation of ethanol, tobacco smoke, and/or diet, appears to act as a cumulative carcinogen in the upper digestive tract of humans. The evidence strongly suggests the importance of world-wide screening of acetaldehyde and ethanol levels in many beverages and foodstuffs, as well as an urgent need for regulatory measures and consumer guidance. Screening of the risk groups with enhanced acetaldehyde exposure, e.g. people with ADH and ALDH2 gene polymorphisms and hypochlorhydric atrophic gastritis, should also be seriously considered. Most importantly, the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status of acetaldehyde, which allows it to be used as a food additive, should be re-evaluated, and the classification of acetaldehyde as a carcinogen should be upgraded.

From alcohol toxicity to treatment

This article presents the proceedings of a symposium held at the meeting of the International Society for Biomedical Research on Alcoholism in Mannheim, Germany, in October 2004. This symposium was dedicated to Charles S. Lieber in recognition of his contribution in alcohol research over the last 50 years. It was divided into two parts, namely effects of alcohol on the gastrointestinal tract and effects of alcohol on the liver. Major emphasis was given to recent discoveries elucidating mechanisms of alcohol-associated carcinogenesis. M. Salaspuro (Finland) discussed the role of acetaldehyde in the saliva and in the large intestine with respect to its role in the pathogenesis of alcohol-associated cancer, and H. K. Seitz (Germany) presented new data identifying individuals homozygous for the ADH1C&1 allele as high on risk for alcohol-associated upper aerodigestive tract cancer. M. Savolainen (Finland) discussed the role phosphatidylethanol as a bioactive lipid that can mediate beneficial and harmful effects of alcohol drinking. In the second part of the symposium, alcoholic liver disease was discussed. P. Haber (Australia) presented new data on hepatic transcriptome in alcoholic liver disease with the identification of new genes possibly involved in alcohol-initiated fibrogenesis of the liver, and H. Moshage (The Netherlands) described survival mechanisms of the cholestatic hepatocytes with implications for therapy in cholestatic liver disease. The role of the hepatic microsomal ethanol oxidizing system in the metabolism of alcohol in alcoholic liver disease was summarized by R. Teschke (Germany). H. Ishii (Japan) discussed the current status and treatment of alcoholic hepatitis in Japan. Finally, in a state-of-the-art lecture, Charles S. Lieber (USA) discussed the development of the understanding of the pathophysiology of alcoholic liver disease in the last 50 years. He emphasized the role of pathophysiology as an important prerequisite for better treatment strategies.