Comparing Human Amniotic Allograft and Standard Wound Care When Using Total Contact Casting in the Treatment of Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Combined therapeutic use of umbilical cord blood serum and amniotic membrane in diabetic wounds

Diabetic wounds are hard-to-heal due to complex multifactorial dysregulation within the micro-environment, necessitating the development of novel regenerative approaches to stimulate healing. This study investigated whether the combined therapeutic application of two novel cellular tissue products, namely a decellularized collagen-rich amniotic membrane (AmR) and growth factor-rich umbilical cord blood serum (UCBS) could have a positive synergistic effect on long-term healing outcomes by stimulating both superficial wound closure and wound bed regeneration. Full thickness excisional wounds were induced on obese diabetic mice (B6.Cg-lepob/J, ob/ob, n = 23) and treated with either: 1) Standard wound care (control); 2) UCBS; 3) AmR or 4) UCBS + AmR. Macroscopic wound closure was assessed on days 0, 3, 7, 10 and 14 post wounding. To determine the potential impact on wound recurrence, endpoint analysis was performed to determine both the overall quality of healing histologically as well as the molecular state of the wounds on day 14 via proteomic analysis. The data demonstrated the presence of both healers and non-healers. Re-epithelization took place in the healers of all treatment groups, but underlying tissue regeneration was far more pronounced following application of the combined treatment (UCBS + AmR), suggesting improved quality of healing and potentially a reduced change of recurrence long term. In non-healers, wounds failed to heal due to excessive slough formation and a reduction in LTB4 expression, suggesting impaired antimicrobial activity. Care should thus be taken since the cellular tissue product therapy could pose an increased risk for infection in some patients.

Effectiveness of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

It is critical that interventions used to enhance the healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes are backed by high-quality evidence and cost-effectiveness. In previous years, the systematic review accompanying guidelines published by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot performed 4-yearly updates of previous searches, including trials of prospective, cross-sectional and case-control design.

AIMS

Due to a need to re-evaluate older studies against newer standards of reporting and assessment of risk of bias, we performed a whole new search from conception, but limiting studies to randomised control trials only.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for published studies on randomised control trials of interventions to enhance healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers. We only included trials comparing interventions to standard of care. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion and assessed relevant outcomes as well as methodological quality.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 22,250 articles, of which 262 were selected for full text review across 10 categories of interventions. Overall, the certainty of evidence for a majority of wound healing interventions was low or very low, with moderate evidence existing for two interventions (sucrose-octasulfate and leucocyte, platelet and fibrin patch) and low quality evidence for a further four (hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, placental derived products and negative pressure wound therapy). The majority of interventions had insufficient evidence.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the evidence to support any other intervention to enhance wound healing is lacking and further high-quality randomised control trials are encouraged.

Guidelines on interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update)

AIMS

Principles of wound management, including debridement, wound bed preparation, and newer technologies involving alternation of wound physiology to facilitate healing, are of utmost importance when attempting to heal a chronic diabetes-related foot ulcer. However, the rising incidence and costs of diabetes-related foot ulcer management necessitate that interventions to enhance wound healing of chronic diabetes-related foot ulcers are supported by high-quality evidence of efficacy and cost effectiveness when used in conjunction with established aspects of gold-standard multidisciplinary care. This is the 2023 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) evidence-based guideline on wound healing interventions to promote healing of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes. It serves as an update of the 2019 IWGDF guideline.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed the GRADE approach by devising clinical questions and important outcomes in the Patient-Intervention-Control-Outcome (PICO) format, undertaking a systematic review, developing summary of judgements tables, and writing recommendations and rationale for each question. Each recommendation is based on the evidence found in the systematic review and, using the GRADE summary of judgement items, including desirable and undesirable effects, certainty of evidence, patient values, resources required, cost effectiveness, equity, feasibility, and acceptability, we formulated recommendations that were agreed by the authors and reviewed by independent experts and stakeholders.

RESULTS

From the results of the systematic review and evidence-to-decision making process, we were able to make 29 separate recommendations. We made a number of conditional supportive recommendations for the use of interventions to improve healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes. These include the use of sucrose octasulfate dressings, the use of negative pressure wound therapies for post-operative wounds, the use of placental-derived products, the use of the autologous leucocyte/platelet/fibrin patch, the use of topical oxygen therapy, and the use of hyperbaric oxygen. Although in all cases it was stressed that these should be used where best standard of care was not able to heal the wound alone and where resources were available for the interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

These wound healing recommendations should support improved outcomes for people with diabetes and ulcers of the foot, and we hope that widescale implementation will follow. However, although the certainty of much of the evidence on which to base the recommendations is improving, it remains poor overall. We encourage not more, but better quality trials including those with a health economic analysis, into this area.

Amnion-derived hydrogels as a versatile platform for regenerative therapy: from lab to market

In recent years, the amnion (AM) has emerged as a versatile tool for stimulating tissue regeneration and has been of immense interest for clinical applications. AM is an abundant and cost-effective tissue source that does not face strict ethical issues for biomedical applications. The outstanding biological attributes of AM, including side-dependent angiogenesis, low immunogenicity, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and antibacterial properties facilitate its usage for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. However, the clinical usage of thin AM sheets is accompanied by some limitations, such as handling without folding or tearing and the necessity for sutures to keep the material over the wound, which requires additional considerations. Therefore, processing the decellularized AM (dAM) tissue into a temperature-sensitive hydrogel has expanded its processability and applicability as an injectable hydrogel for minimally invasive therapies and a source of bioink for the fabrication of biomimetic tissue constructs by recapitulating desired biochemical cues or pre-defined architectural design. This article reviews the multi-functionality of dAM hydrogels for various biomedical applications, including skin repair, heart treatment, cartilage regeneration, endometrium regeneration, vascular graft, dental pulp regeneration, and cell culture/carrier platform. Not only recent and cutting-edge research is reviewed but also available commercial products are introduced and their main features and shortcomings are elaborated. Besides the great potential of AM-derived hydrogels for regenerative therapy, intensive interdisciplinary studies are still required to modify their mechanical and biological properties in order to broaden their therapeutic benefits and biomedical applications. Employing additive manufacturing techniques (e.g., bioprinting), nanotechnology approaches (e.g., inclusion of various bioactive nanoparticles), and biochemical alterations (e.g., modification of dAM matrix with photo-sensitive molecules) are of particular interest. This review article aims to discuss the current function of dAM hydrogels for the repair of target tissues and identifies innovative methods for broadening their potential applications for nanomedicine and healthcare.

Advanced Biomaterials and Topical Medications for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Significance: With the increasing diabetic population worldwide, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a significant concern. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of skin substitutes, biomaterials, and topical agents with standard care. Recent Advances: A meta-analysis was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched using the following keywords: diabetes mellitus AND skin graft OR tissue replacement OR dressing OR drug. Two independent reviewers performed data collection and quality assessment of the eligible studies. The primary outcome was the 12- to 16-week healing rates and the secondary outcome was recurrence rates. Critical Issues: Thirty-eight randomized controlled trials, including 3,862 patients, were analyzed. The studies exhibited low heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.10) without significant asymmetry (Egger's test, p = 0.8852). After pooling direct and indirect estimates, placenta-based tissue products exhibited the best wound healing probability (p-score = 0.90), followed by skin substitutes with living cells (p-score = 0.70), acellular skin substitutes (p-score = 0.56), and advanced topical dressings (p-score = 0.34) compared with standard of care. The recurrence analysis showed significant improvement in the intervention group compared with the control group (11.21% vs. 15.15%). Future Directions: This network meta-analysis provides the relative effectiveness and rank of biomaterials and topical dressings in DFU healing. The results could help clinical decision making.

Skin substitutes as treatment for chronic wounds: current and future directions

Chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers place a significant burden on the healthcare system and in some cases, have 5-year mortality rates comparable to cancer. They negatively impact patients' quality of life due to pain, odor, decreased mobility, and social isolation. Skin substitutes are an advanced therapy recommended for wounds that fail to show decrease in size with standard care. The choice of substitute used should be based on evidence, which often differs based on wound etiology. There are more than 75 skin substitutes currently available, and that number is rising. In this review, we discuss current management and future directions of chronic wounds while providing a review of available randomized control trial data for various skin substitutes.

Placental-Derived Biomaterials and Their Application to Wound Healing: A Review

Chronic wounds are associated with considerable patient morbidity and present a significant economic burden to the healthcare system. Often, chronic wounds are in a state of persistent inflammation and unable to progress to the next phase of wound healing. Placental-derived biomaterials are recognized for their biocompatibility, biodegradability, angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antifibrotic, immunomodulatory, and immune privileged properties. As such, placental-derived biomaterials have been used in wound management for more than a century. Placental-derived scaffolds are composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) that can mimic the native tissue, creating a reparative environment to promote ECM remodeling, cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Reliable evidence exists throughout the literature to support the safety and effectiveness of placental-derived biomaterials in wound healing. However, differences in source (i.e., anatomical regions of the placenta), preservation techniques, decellularization status, design, and clinical application have not been fully evaluated. This review provides an overview of wound healing and placental-derived biomaterials, summarizes the clinical results of placental-derived scaffolds in wound healing, and suggests directions for future work.

Human amniotic membrane products for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. do they help? a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most serious diabetic complications. DFU is an open wound that usually occurs in the foot sole due to poor blood glucose control, peripheral neuropathy, and poor circulation. The human amniotic allograft membrane is a biological wound dressing derived from the amniotic membrane. It contains amino acids, nutrients, cytokines, and growth factors that make the growth process easier.

Objective

To compare dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (DHACA) plus the standard of wound care (SOC) with the SOC alone.

Methods

We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science till April 2021 using relevant keywords. All search results were screened for eligibility. We extracted the data from the included trials and pooled them as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) using Review Manager software (ver. 5.4).

Results

The pooled effect estimate from 11 RCTs showed that DHACA was superior to SOC regarding the complete wound healing in both 6th and 12th week (RR = 3.78; 95% CI: [2.51, 5.70]; P < 0.00001) and (RR = 2.00; 95% CI: [1.67, 2.39], P < 0.00001 respectively). Also, the analysis favored the DHACA regarding the mean time to heal in the 12th-week (MD = -12.07, 95%CI: [-19.23, -4.91], P = 0.001). The wound size reduction was better with DHACA (MD = 1.18, 95%CI: [-0,10, 2.26], P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Using DHACA with SOC is safer and more effective than using SOC alone for DFU patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00575-y.

Amniotic growth factors enhanced human pre-adipocyte cell viability and differentiation under hypoxia

One of the major drawbacks associated with autologous fat grafting is unpredictable graft retention. Various efforts to improve the survivability of these cells have been explored, but these methods are time‐consuming, complex, and demand significant technical skill. In our study, we examine the use of cryopreserved amniotic membrane as a source of exogenous growth factors to improve adipocyte survivability under normal and hypoxic conditions. Human primary preadipocytes were cultured in a gelatin‐ferulic acid (Gtn‐FA) hydrogel with variable oxygen concentration and treated with amniotic membrane‐derived condition medium (CM) for 7 days. This hydrogel provides a hypoxic environment and also creates a 3D cell culture to better mimic recipient site conditions. The O₂ concentration in the hydrogel was measured by electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen imaging (EPROI). The conjugation of FA was confirmed by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy. The cell viability and adipocyte differentiation were analyzed by alamarBlue™ assay, Oil Red O staining, and RT‐qPCR. The expression of genes: Pref‐1, C/EBP β, C/EBP α, PPAR‐ƴ, SLC2A4, and VEGF‐A were quantified. The cell viability results show that the 50% CM showed significantly higher cell pre‐adipocyte cell viability. In addition, compared to normal conditions, hypoxia/CM provided higher PPAR‐ƴ (p < .05), SLC2A4, and VEGF‐A (p < .05) (early and terminal differentiating markers) mRNA expression. This finding demonstrates the efficacy of amniotic CM supplementation as a novel way to promote adipocyte survival and retention via the expression of key gene markers for differentiation and angiogenesis.

Human Amnion Chorion Membrane Allografts in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

To discuss human amnion chorion (placental) membrane allograft (HACMA) use for the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and to evaluate the effectiveness, cost, and product waste of this therapy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Twenty-four articles pertaining to HACMA and DFUs published from 2016 to 2020 were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

The data collected included type of wound care product, study design, study size, baseline size of DFU, cost, product wastage, number of applications, and wound healing outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Human amnion chorion membrane allografts in the treatment of chronic DFUs have led to a reduction in healing time and increased the overall percentage of healing, making them more effective in treating DFUs compared with standard of care. These products are offered in multiple sizes with various shelf lives and methods of storage, making them accessible, easy to use, less wasteful, and lower in cost compared with other commercially available products. Promising evidence demonstrates that HACMAs are beneficial in treating complex, high-grade DFUs with exposed tendon or bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Human amnion chorion membrane allografts are effective in treating chronic DFUs with a greater percentage of complete wound closure and a reduction in healing time versus standard of care.

Systematic review on the rational use of amniotic membrane allografts in diabetic foot ulcer treatment

Background

Diabetic foot ulcer is a complication with multiple aetiological factors which has a significant impact to patients’ lives and costs to the healthcare system. The potential of human amniotic membrane to act as an allograft has been studied in relation to this condition. Aim of this study is to evaluate the current scientific evidence on its effectiveness in healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Methods

Pubmed, Cochrane library, and Google scholar were searched using the search terms, “Amnion” OR “Placenta” AND “Diabetic foot”. (MeSH terms) in the title or the abstract field from 1st of January 2000 to 30th March 2020. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. We searched for experimental and observational studies in terms of randomized control trials, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort studies and case series.

Results

When searched with Mesh terms, 12 citations in PubMed, 22 citations in Cochrane library and 30 in other data bases were found. After screening the studies and their reference lists, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and the others were excluded. There were 8 randomized control trials (RCTs), 2 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies employing different preparation methods of the amniotic membranes. A wide variation in study end points were noted. Majority of the RCTs (n = 7) were concluded with significantly higher wound closure rate compared to the conventional treatment groups. In prospective and retrospective studies, it was shown that large chronic ulcers which were resistant to closure with standard therapy achieved wound closure with amniotic membrane allografts. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to study heterogeneity, and publication bias was not assessed due to the small number of available studies which was not sufficient for accurate comparison.

Conclusion

Even though, the studies had some inherent heterogeneity due to different preparation methods, different study end points and outcome measurements. According to our review the current studies using amniotic membrane allografts give reliable evidence of reduction in healing time over conventional methods.

One-year safety, healing and amputation rates of Wagner 3-4 diabetic foot ulcers treated with cryopreserved umbilical cord (TTAX01)

An open label, multicenter 16‐week trial of cryopreserved human umbilical cord (TTAX01) was previously undertaken in 32 subjects presenting with a Wagner grade 3 or 4 diabetic foot ulcer, with 16 (50%) of these having confirmed closure following a median of one product application (previous study). All but two subjects (30/32; 94%) consented to participate in this follow‐up study to 1‐year postexposure. No restrictions were placed on treatments for open wounds. At 8‐week intervals, subjects were evaluated for adverse events (AEs) and wound status (open or closed). Average time from initial exposure to end of follow‐up was 378 days (range 343‐433), with 29 of 30 (97%) subjects completing a full year. AEs were all typical for the population under study, and none were attributed to prior exposure to TTAX01. One previously healed wound re‐opened, one previously unconfirmed closed wound remained healed, and nine new wound closures occurred, giving 25 of 29 (86.2%) healed in the ITT population. Three of the new closures followed the use of various tissue‐based products. Three subjects whose wounds were healed required subsequent minor amputations due to osteomyelitis, one of which progressed to a major amputation (1/29; 3.4%). One additional subject underwent two minor amputations prior to healing. Overall, the study found TTAX01 to be safe in long‐term follow‐up and associated with both a low rate of major amputation and a higher than expected rates of healing.

Human amniotic membrane allograft, a novel treatment for chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of human amniotic membrane (HAM) allograft in treating chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a comprehensive search of randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science was conducted to December 7, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of studies. The primary outcome was the proportion of complete healing. The secondary outcomes were mean time to complete healing and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. We identified 257 articles, of which 7 articles (465 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. The proportion of complete wound healing in HAM plus standard of care (SOC) group was 3.88 times as high as that in SOC alone (RR: 3.88 [95% CI: 2.34, 6.44]) at 6 weeks, and 2.01 times at 12 weeks (RR: 2.01 [95%CI: 1.45, 2.77]). The intervention group had a significantly shorter time to complete healing (MD: -30.33 days, [95% CI: -37.95, -22.72]). The number needed to treat within 6 weeks was 2.3 ([95% CI: 1.8, 3.1]). No significant difference was shown in adverse events. Results were consistent in a sensitivity analysis. Hence, HAM plus SOC is effective and safe in treating chronic DFUs.