The Versajet??? Water Dissector: A New Tool for Tangential Excision

Application of minimally invasive debridement for deep second-degree facial burns in the early postburn phase

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive dermabrasion for deep second-degree facial burn wounds during the early postburn phase.

METHODS

A total of 35 patients with deep second-degree facial burns underwent minimally invasive debridement using a hydrosurgery system within 2-4 days post-injury. Subsequently, the wounds were covered with human biological dressings. The wound infection rate, healing time, and overall healing quality following debridement were monitored.

RESULT

In this cohort of 35 patients, no infections were reported after debridement. The average healing time for these wounds was significantly shorter than that of those treated with standard surgical excision. Clinical observations indicated that minimally invasive dermabrasion was associated with a lower infection rate and reduced healing time. After 6 months, scar assessment using the Vancouver Scar Scale showed that the average score for wounds treated with minimally invasive techniques was lower than those treated with standard surgical excisional technique.

CONCLUSIONS

This research indicates that minimally invasive debridement during the early postburn stage can effectively reduce wound infection rates, shorten healing times, and minimize the occurrence of scar hyperplasia and contracture deformities. Therefore, minimally invasive dermabrasion is valuable in treating deep second-degree facial burn wounds.

Additional treatments after curettage of congenital melanocytic nevi in the craniofacial region: A report from a single center in Japan

BACKGROUND

Congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) is a benign skin lesion present from birth, which may present with a risk of malignant transformation if extensive. Curettage, a treatment method involving the removal of the superficial layer of the nevus, is often used in the early stages of life. However, recurrence of the nevus and postoperative scarring may present as problems. Additional treatments, such as resection and/or laser treatment, are regularly required after curettage, particularly in the craniofacial region. However, no systematic treatment strategy has been reported. This study investigated additional treatments used after curettage to treat CMN in the craniofacial region and compared the frequency of treatments with respect to specific sites.

METHODS

CMN cases involving curettage as an initial treatment were retrospectively reviewed at Kyoto University Hospital between May 2019 and April 2022.

RESULTS

This study comprised 23 cases. Curettage was performed at a mean of 3.8 (1-10) months of age. No additional treatments were provided for 80% of head CMN. Additional treatments were performed in all cases, including the forehead and cheek. Laser treatment was performed in 86% of eyelid CMN and 75% of nasal CMN. Tissue expansion and flap closure were used in 33% of forehead CMN and 33% of cheek CMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional treatments used for CMN in the craniofacial region varied in accordance with the lesion site.

Optimizing Outcomes in the Management of the Burned Hand

Burns of the hand are prevalent and must be managed aggressively in the acute phase to prevent deformity and disability. Proper early wound management, achieving durable soft tissue coverage, and appropriate positioning in the acute period offer substantial benefits to patients long-term. When contractures occur, secondary procedures are often indicated, and they range from laser therapy to local/regional flap coverage; rarely free flaps are used. Boutonniere deformities are common, and unfortunately, at times finger amputation renders the hand more functional than further efforts at reconstruction.

Changes in gene expression in pressure ulcers debrided by different approaches - a pilot study

Pressure ulcers (PUs), also known as pressure injuries, are chronic wounds that represent potential lifelong complications. Pressure ulcers of a deep category (III and IV) are often indicated for surgical treatment - debridement and surgical reconstruction. Sharp surgical debridement is widely used in the debridement of PUs; however, the Versajet® hydrosurgery system is becoming an increasingly popular tool for tangential excision in surgery due to its numerous advantages. This work focused on the expression of selected genes, especially those associated with oxidative stress, in PUs debrided by two approaches - sharp surgical debridement and debridement using Versajet® hydrosurgery system. Expression of following genes was evaluated: NFE2L2, ACTA2, NFKB1, VEGFA, MKI67, HMOX1, HMOX2, HIF1A, and SOD2. ACTB and PSMB were used as housekeeping genes. So far, five patients have been enrolled in the study. Preliminary results suggest no significant difference in gene expression with different pressure ulcer treatment approaches except NFE2L2, despite the macroscopic differences. However, the results revealed correlations between the expression of some genes, namely HIF1A and SOD2, VEGFA and SOD2 and VEGFA and HIF1A. These results may indicate a connection between hypoxia, oxidative stress, pressure ulcer healing processes and angiogenesis.

Safety and efficacy of waterjet debridement vs. conventional debridement in the treatment of extremely severe burns: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with extremely severe burns often require rapid wound closure with a tangential excision or escharectomy combined with a skin graft to reduce life-threatening complications such as infection. Traditional tangential excision surgery using the Watson or Humby knife does not allow accurate excision of necrotic tissue and often removes too much active tissue, which is detrimental to the rapid healing of the wound. Importantly, the Versajet hydrosurgical system, with its smaller handle, allows for more precise excision of necrotic burn tissue and preserves more active dermal tissue, positively affecting wound healing and scarring. This study compared the safety and efficacy of hydrosurgical combined with autologous skin grafting to conventional excision combined with autologous skin grafting in patients with extremely severe burn.

METHODS

Information of sixty burn patients with total body surface area (TBSA) > 50 % treated at the first affiliated hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2019 to August 2022 were analyzed. The patients were divided into a conventional debridement group (n = 37) and a hydrosurgical debridement group (n = 23) according to the approach used. The hydrosurgical debridement group and the conventional debridement group were compared from the difference between the duration of the first debridement surgery, wound healing time, the changes of red blood cells and hemoglobin concentration postoperative, total blood transfusion, hospitalization cost, skin grafting frequency, procalcitonin, wound bacterial culture, albumin and prealbumin.

RESULTS

Information on age, gender, weight, inhalation injury, hypovolemic shock, preoperative procalcitonin, preoperative albumin, preoperative prealbumin, the operation frequency (n ≥ 3), preoperative trauma culture and postoperative trauma culture were compared between both groups (P > 0.05). Operative time and wound healing time were significantly shorter in patients with hydrosurgical debridement combined with autologous skin grafting than those in the control group (P < 0.05), while hospitalization costs were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The changes of red blood cells and hemoglobin concentration during the postoperative period in the hydrosurgical debridement group were less significantly than those in the conventional debridement group (P < 0.05). The total amount of red blood cells transfused during hospitalization was significantly lower in the hydrosurgical debridement group than that in the conventional debridement group (P < 0.05), but the total amount of fresh frozen plasma transfused during hospitalization was not statistically significant between the two groups (P > 0.05). Albumin on the third day after surgery and prealbumin on the first, third and fifth day after surgery improved more significantly than those in the control group(P < 0.05), however, there were no significant differences between the two groups in albumin on the first and fifth postoperative days (P > 0.05). The PCT level in the conventional debridement group was significantly higher than that in the hydrosurgical debridement group on the first, third and fifth days after surgery(P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The hydrosurgical debridement group presented with shorter operative time, less blood loss during surgery, faster postoperative nutritional recovery, less postoperative inflammatory response and faster wounds healing, and did not increase the hospitalization cost, postoperative bacterial culture of the wounds and the number of skin grafting surgeries. In patients with extremely severe burn, hydrosurgical debridement combined with autologous skin grafting group is safer and more effective than those in the conventional debridement combined with autologous skin grafting group.

Efficacy of Versajet hydrosurgery system in chronic wounds: A systematic review

Studies demonstrating the effectiveness of hydrosurgery for chronic wounds are extremely limited. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hydrosurgery compared with conventional debridement in chronic wounds, skin ulcers, and non‐acute wounds. This PROSPERO‐registered review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Abstracts of all studies were screened independently by two reviewers. The bias of prospective randomised controlled studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias and RevMan 5.4 software, whereas the bias of retrospective comparative studies was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non‐randomised Studies. Two prospective randomised controlled trials, two retrospective comparative studies, and three prospective non‐comparative studies were included. Hydrosurgery enabled rapid debridement. The Versajet Hydrosurgery System saved 8.87 minutes compared with the conventional methods. Similarly, the debridement quality was high with this system. The debridement number needed to achieve adequate wound beds was fewer in the hydrosurgery group than in the conventional group. These superiorities lead to subsequent success and cost‐effectiveness. As there were only two prospective randomised controlled studies, and much information was missing, the risk of bias was unclear. This review confirmed that hydrosurgery is useful for the debridement of chronic wounds, considering the procedural speed and quality.

Evidence and Trends in Burn Wound Debridement: An Evidence Map

Treatment of the burn wound is crucial in care of severely burned patients. Surgical strategies differ in technique and timing of wound excision and are considered to have an impact on morbidity and mortality of burn patients. Most techniques and strategies have been established during the last century and are still standard of care. Nonetheless, several newer techniques have been presented and evaluated recently. To summarize the evidence and trends for eschar removal by burn wound debridement currently available, an evidence map as variant of the systematic review, was prepared. For this purpose, a systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed databases until December 2016. While overall evidence in this domain is low, recent publications focus on optimal timing of wound excision, enzymatic debridement, and hydrosurgery. Several studies report the benefit of an early wound excision in terms of shorter hospital stay, lower wound infection rate, and reduction of postburn metabolic changes. Enzymatic debridement has been shown to be an effective tool for early eschar removal and in addition reduces the need for autografting of the debrided burn wound with a relatively high level of evidence (LoE 2-). Wound debridement by means of hydrosurgery is more precise compared to conventional wound excision and preserves viable dermis, but a positive effect on wound healing or scar formation could not been shown (LoE 2). Furthermore, rarely reported techniques comprise larvae therapy, debridement by laser, and other technical adjuncts, but the level of evidence is limited (LoE 4-/5).

Reconstruction of the Necrotic Scrotum with Hydrosurgery System and Pedicle DIEP Flap: A Case Report of Fournier Gangrene

Despite medical advances, the mortality rate associated with Fournier gangrene has remained largely unchanged and extremely high. In addition, conventional surgical treatment of Fournier gangrene of the scrotum requires excision of the testicles in some cases, which can result in loss of fertility. We report herein the favorable results of reconstruction of the scrotum following Fournier gangrene, using the hydrosurgery system and pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. A 60-year-old male patient was urgently transported to our hospital for fever, lower abdominal pain, and scrotal pain for several days. He was diagnosed with Fournier gangrene and underwent an emergency debridement procedure on the same day. Later, we performed a 2-phase reconstruction with a hydrosurgery system and pedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap under general anesthesia for the postoperative tissue defect. At 6 months postoperatively, there was no ulceration or scar contracture, and the results were aesthetically pleasing. There are no reported cases of reconstruction of the scrotum following Fournier gangrene using this procedure, and it might be an effective treatment option.

Reconstruction of Lower Limb Necrotizing Fasciitis by Hydrosurgical Debridement and Multiperforator Anterolateral Thigh Flap

The authors describe a surgical treatment that optimally combined the use of the hydrosurgical system and a free multiperforator anterolateral thigh flap to prevent lower limb amputation in a severe case of necrotizing fasciitis. A 43-year-old woman was diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis, and amputation was performed at the level of the metatarsal shafts with an emergency debridement using the hydrosurgical system. In the second reconstructive surgery, a free anterolateral thigh flap measuring 28 × 8 cm² was harvested using the left thigh as the donor site and the vascular pedicle was made up of a total of 3 vessels, 2 perforating arteries from the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery, and 1 oblique branch from the lateral circumflex femoral artery. To thin the flap, we first resected as much subcutaneous fat as possible in the distal part of the flap (which would eventually cover the ankle joint) and ensured adequate residual volume of the proximal part of the flap (which would cover the metatarsal stumps). We then sutured the flap to the tissue defect on the left foot and then end-to-side anastomosing the lateral femoral circumflex artery and posterior tibial artery while the 2 veins were anastomosed to the posterior tibial veins under a microscope. Six months after the surgery, adequate flap volume was maintained over the metatarsal stumps with no postoperative complications such as infection or ulcer formation, and there were no other complications such as motor dysfunction at the donor site on the left thigh.

Coverage of soft tissue defects in acute surgery for deep burns of the limbs

Burns of the limbs affect 48.6% of burn patients. Injury mechanisms condition their depth and degree of extension. Injury of the hands and/or the joint areas entails considerable risk of retraction. Coverage is consequently doubly challenging, it is a matter not only of compensating for a soft tissue defects, but also of striving to prevent early (infectious) and late (amplitude limitation, pain, loss of function…) complications. Thoroughgoing assessment of the initial injury and associated lesions is conducive to rapid determination of a therapeutic strategy tailored to the relevant functional issues and subsequent rehabilitation. Following a summary of the epidemiological elements and the medical context of management, a review of existing treatments has been drawn up based on the data in the literature and current professional recommendations. Emergency procedures, the different types of excision and the possibilities of autologous covering and skin substitutes are reported. Last but not least, routinely validated indications are synthesized.

Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial-thickness burns

BACKGROUND

Burn injuries are the fourth most common traumatic injury, causing an estimated 180,000 deaths annually worldwide. Superficial burns can be managed with dressings alone, but deeper burns or those that fail to heal promptly are usually treated surgically. Acute burns surgery aims to debride burnt skin until healthy tissue is reached, at which point skin grafts or temporising dressings are applied. Conventional debridement is performed with an angled blade, tangentially shaving burned tissue until healthy tissue is encountered. Hydrosurgery, an alternative to conventional blade debridement, simultaneously debrides, irrigates, and removes tissue with the aim of minimising damage to uninjured tissue. Despite the increasing use of hydrosurgery, its efficacy and the risk of adverse events following surgery for burns is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of hydrosurgical debridement and skin grafting versus conventional surgical debridement and skin grafting for the treatment of acute partial-thickness burns.

SEARCH METHODS

In December 2019 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled people of any age with acute partial-thickness burn injury and assessed the use of hydrosurgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment, and GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

One RCT met the inclusion criteria of this review. The study sample size was 61 paediatric participants with acute partial-thickness burns of 3% to 4% total burn surface area. Participants were randomised to hydrosurgery or conventional debridement. There may be little or no difference in mean time to complete healing (mean difference (MD) 0.00 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.25 to 6.25) or postoperative infection risk (risk ratio 1.33, 95% CI 0.57 to 3.11). These results are based on very low-certainty evidence, which was downgraded twice for risk of bias, once for indirectness, and once for imprecision. There may be little or no difference in operative time between hydrosurgery and conventional debridement (MD 0.2 minutes, 95% CI -12.2 to 12.6); again, the certainty of the evidence is very low, downgraded once for risk of bias, once for indirectness, and once for imprecision. There may be little or no difference in scar outcomes at six months. Health-related quality of life, resource use, and other adverse outcomes were not reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review contains one randomised trial of hydrosurgery versus conventional debridement in a paediatric population with low percentage of total body surface area burn injuries. Based on the available trial data, there may be little or no difference between hydrosurgery and conventional debridement in terms of time to complete healing, postoperative infection, operative time, and scar outcomes at six months. These results are based on very low-certainty evidence. Further research evaluating these outcomes as well as health-related quality of life, resource use, and other adverse event outcomes is required.

Hydrosurgical Debridement Allows Effective Wound Bed Preparation of Pressure Injuries: A Prospective Case Series

Background:

Pressure injuries (PIs) are common in hospitalized patients, with incidence exceeding 50% in high-risk patients. Immobilization causes a prolonged compression of vascular networks in tissues overlying bony prominences, leading to ischemia and ulceration. Traditionally, PIs are treated with a combination of surgical debridement and reconstruction. This approach can be invasive for debilitated patients who cannot tolerate prolonged surgeries and extensive tissue resection. Hydrosurgery uses high-pressure irrigation to low-invasively debride and cleanse wounds; its use has shown positive outcomes in burn and chronic wounds care. Here, we hypothesize that hydrosurgery allows low-invasive yet effective wound bed preparation in truncal PIs.

Methods:

We conducted a single-center, prospective, uncontrolled case series. Inclusion criteria for this study were presence of a truncal PI (stage III or IV) and an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of ≥2 (no exclusion criteria). Measured outcomes included duration of hydrosurgery, postsurgical local (dehiscence, infection, seroma) or systemic complications in the first 30 days, and PI recurrence rate (6-month follow-up).

Results:

Seven patients (3 sacral, 2 greater trochanteric, and 2 ischial tuberosity PIs) were enrolled for this study. Average duration of hydrosurgery was 12 minutes (±3.1). No local or systemic complications were observed at a 30-day follow-up (0/7, 0%). All flaps (6/7, 86%) and graft (1/7, 14%) reconstructions successfully survived, and no PI recurrence was reported within a 6-month follow-up (0/7, 0%).

Conclusions:

Hydrosurgery seems to allow safe, low-invasive, and effective wound bed preparation in truncal PIs. Larger controlled trials are needed to confirm this preliminary evidence, to guide its broader adoption for improved care of high-risk patients with PIs.

Hydrosurgical debridement as an approach to wound healing: an animal thermal burn model

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the advantages of hydrosurgical debridement compared with surgical debridement.

METHOD

Thermal skin burns were created on the backs of male Wistar rats. Surgical debridement was used to treat one wound and hydrosurgical debridement (Versajet Hydrosurgery System, Smith&Nephew, UK) used to treat the second wound. Debridement time, blood loss volume, time-to-heal and histologic changes in the wound areas were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 23 rats were used in the study. Debridement time and time-to-heal were significantly shorter with hydrosurgical debridement than with surgical debridement (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). Blood loss volume was significantly less with hydrosurgical debridement (p<0.01), and the wound surface area was significantly smaller on days two (p<0.01), four (p<0.05) and seven (p<0.05). Dense inflammatory cell infiltration into dermal muscle was deeper after surgical debridement (p=0.017). Reactive fibrotic tissue at the wound surface was significantly thinner (p<0.001) and the vascular endothelial cell count was significantly higher (p<0.001) after hydrosurgical debridement.

CONCLUSION

The hydrosurgical system used appears to provide for minimally invasive debridement that can be performed in a relatively short period of time. Use of the device appears to minimise injury to healthy tissue and ameliorate inflammation, which in turn promotes early wound healing and reduces scar contracture. Hydrosurgical debridement appears to cause less damage to normal tissues. Furthermore, it is easier and requires less time.

Selective debridement of burn wounds using hydrosurgery system

In recent years, hydrosurgery is a technology that has been applied more and more in debridement procedures. However, the selectivity of hydrosurgery to cutaneous necrotic tissues has not been proved. This study was designed to investigate the possible tissue selectivity of hydrosurgery in the debridement in burn wounds. Deep partial-thickness burns were produced on the back of porcine, and 48 hours later, both burn wounds and normal skin were debrided using the hydrosurgery system. Then tissue samples were taken, and histological staining was performed and observed under microscope. Burn wound resection rates and the normal skin damaged rates were measured. Our result indicated that the burn wounds were significantly more sensitive than the normal skin when the water pressure produced by the hydrosurgery system was set between 3000 and 5000 psi (pounds per square inch), that is, the necrotic tissue portions were debrided more easily than the normal skin tissue. Based on these data, we suggest that 3000 to 5000 psi of water pressure in the hydrosurgery system has a skin tissue selectivity in burn wounds.

Preparation of harvested skin using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System in full-thickness skin grafts

During a full-thickness skin graft procedure, the thickness of the harvested donor skin is adjusted based on the location of the recipient site and the judgment of the surgeon. Conventionally, the thickness of the harvested skin is roughly adjusted using surgical instruments such as scalpels and scissors. However, this method is not only time-consuming, but also requires effort to obtain both the desired thickness of the harvested skin and a smooth surface of that skin. Moreover, there is a possibility of skin perforation. Hence, the authors devised a method of adjusting harvested skin thickness using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System. The Versajet device is a handheld hydrosurgical tool that delivers a high-speed jet stream of saline solution, which enables the precise debridement of tissue. This method makes it easier and faster for the surgeon to obtain the desired thickness of harvested skin. In addition, by obtaining a smooth surface and an even thickness of harvested donor skin, this technique may lead to improved graft viability.

Micrografting chronic lower extremity ulcers with mechanically disaggregated skin using a micrograft preparation system

OBJECTIVE

The Rigenera system is a new standardised micrograft preparation system. It works by means of automated mechanical disaggregation of small tissue samples, extracting only the smallest cells (<50µm). The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate patients affected by chronic ulcers and who were treated with the micrograft preparation method.

METHOD

Chronic ulcers have been included regardless of the cause. The specimen was collected with a 3mm diameter biopsy punch and immediately dissociated by means of the Rigenera System. The obtained suspension was placed on a scaffold of equine collagen.

RESULTS

We included 15 patients (four males, 11 females) with a mean age of 72.2±8.41 (mean±standard deviation) years. In seven patients the ulcers were related to the complications of diabetes, post-traumatic in a further three diabetic patients, vasculitis in one patient, and four patients had venous leg ulcers (VLUs). The median main diameter was 5.0cm and the median estimated area was 43.96cm². The ulcers were present from a mean of 4.50±2.30 months before inclusion in this study. At the second week the wounds were reduced by 37.33%±19.35%, at the week eight, nine patients (60.0%) were healed, and at week 16, 13 (86.7%) were healed. The quality of scars was good and did not deteriorate at the six month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The simplicity of the approach, the minimal invasiveness of the specimen collection, and the good quality of scarring of healed wounds, confirmed in the follow-up, makes this micrograft preparation method a useful tool to use on large or complex wounds.

Hydrosurgery as a safe and efficient debridement method in a clinical wound unit

OBJECTIVE

Hydrosurgical debridement allows removal of non-viable tissue, preserving healthy tissues. This study was designed to analyse whether hydrosurgery, used in a clinical wounds unit, is an effective and safe method that may reduce debridement time.

METHODS

Patients' wounds had the following characteristics: wounds with devitalised tissue needing rapid debridement, wounds with cavities, or non-healing wounds. Hydrosurgical debridement uses a pressurised stream of saline (0.9% sodium chloride) and a vacuum around this stream to remove the devitalised tissue of the wound, preserving healthy surrounding tissues.

RESULTS

This prospective study comprised of 53 wounds from 39 patients. The wound aetiology included 39.7% arterial insufficiency, 22.6% pressure ulcers (PUs), 15.1% diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), 9.4% venous leg ulcers (VLUs), and 13.2% from other aetiologies. The percentage of wounds according the size was the following: 32.1% (<10cm²), 43.4% (10-49cm²), 15.1% (50-99cm²), and 9.4% (≥100cm²). Superficial wounds were 43.4% of the total and 56.6% of wounds had cavities. Pain associated with the hydrosurgery was mild to moderate. There were no hydrosurgery-related adverse events. For effective debridement, the required sessions were as follows: one procedure (73.6%), two procedures (18.9%) and three procedures (7.5%). There was a statistical significant direct correlation (r=0.307) between the number of required sessions and wound size. All patients improved in a week (>80% of granulation tissue).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that hydrosurgery is an effective and rapid debridement method that can be used safely in the outpatient setting.

The diathermy scratch pad: A cheap and efficient tool for chemical and explosion-related burns

The burn center in our hospital is a national and regional (Southeast Asia) center. Of all admissions, 10% are related to blast explosions, and 8% due to chemical burns. In the acute burn management protocol of Singapore General Hospital, early surgical debridement is advocated for all acute partial-thickness burns. The aim of early surgical debridement is to remove all debris and unhealthy tissue, preventing wound infection and thereby expediting wound healing. In chemical burns, there can be stubborn eschars that are resistant to traditional debridement. We would like to present a novel technique using the diathermy scratch pad as a cheap and efficient tool for the dual purpose of surgical debridement and dermabrasion.

Application of hydrosurgery for burn wound debridement: An 8-year cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, the Versajet™ hydrosurgery system has become popular as a tool for tangential excision in burn surgery. Although hydrosurgery is thought to be a more precise and controlled manner for burn debridement prior to skin grafting, burn specialists decide individually whether hydrosurgery should be applied in a specific patient or not. The aim of this study was to gain insight in which patients hydrosurgery is used in specialized burn care in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in all patients admitted to a Dutch burn centre between 2009 and 2016. All patients with burns that underwent surgical debridement were included. Data were collected using the national Dutch Burn Repository R3.

RESULTS

Data of 2113 eligible patients were assessed. These patients were treated with hydrosurgical debridement (23.9%), conventional debridement (47.7%) or a combination of these techniques (28.3%). Independent predictors for the use of hydrosurgery were a younger age, scalds, a larger percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) burned, head and neck burns and arm burns. Differences in surgical management and clinical outcome were found between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of hydrosurgery for burn wound debridement prior to skin grafting is substantial. Independent predictors for the use of hydrosurgery were mainly burn related and consisted of a younger age, scalds, a larger TBSA burned, and burns on irregularly contoured body areas. Randomized studies addressing scar quality are needed to open new perspectives on the potential benefits of hydrosurgical burn wound debridement.

Robotic waterjet wound debridement - Workflow adaption for clinical application and systematic evaluation of a novel technology

Objective

We evaluated the clinical potential of a novel robotic system for autonomous performance of waterjet wound debridement.

Summary background data

Within the last decade, waterjet wound debridement has proven to be a valid alternative to the conventional approach using sharp spoons and scalpel.

Methods

The DLR MIRO robot using the DLR MICA instrument for robotic surgery was adapted for actuation of an ERBEJET 2 flexible endoscopic waterjet probe. Waterjet debridement of various wound shapes and sizes using a porcine skin model was compared between this novel robotic system and a control group of human medical professionals with regard to wound area cleaned by the waterjet, off-target area, and procedural time.

Results

After the wound area was registered in the robotic system, it automatically generated a cleaning path and performed debridement based on generated surface model. While the robotic system demonstrated a significant advantage for the covered wound area (p = 0.031), the average off-target area was not significantly different from human controls. Human participants had high variability in cleaning quality across users and trials, while the robotic system provided stable results. Overall procedural time was significantly lower in trials performed by humans.

Conclusions

Robotic waterjet wound debridement is a promising new technological approach compared to the current clinical standard of interventional wound therapy, providing higher efficiency and quality of wound cleaning compared to human performance. Additional trials on more complicated wound shapes and in vivo tissue are necessary to more thoroughly evaluate the clinical potential of this technology.

Versajet-Assisted Hydraulic Epilation Through Small Incisions for Axillary Osmidrosis

Background

Osmidrosis is a malodorous disease caused by the breakdown of sweat secreted from the apocrine glands by surface bacteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Versajet-assisted hydraulic epilation for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with axillary osmidrosis (64 axillae) underwent Versajet-assisted hydraulic epilation between January 2016 and January 2017. Subjective assessments were evaluated by a patient survey at least 3 months after the procedure.

Results

There were no complications other than one mild pigmentation in the axilla at 3 months after the procedure. Thirty-two patients evaluated malodor elimination as good. No patients evaluated it as fair or poor. There were no recurrences.

Conclusion

Versajet-assisted hydraulic epilation is an ideal surgical procedure for the treatment of axillary osmidrosis that decreases complications and recurrence.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional debridement of deep dermal burns (HyCon trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Deep dermal burns require tangential excision of non-viable tissue and skin grafting to improve wound healing and burn-scar quality. Tangential excision is conventionally performed with a knife, but during the last decade hydrosurgery has become popular as a new tool for tangential excision. Hydrosurgery is generally thought to be a more precise and controlled manner of burn debridement leading to preservation of viable tissue and, therefore, better scar quality. Although scar quality is considered to be one of the most important outcomes in burn surgery today, no randomized controlled study has compared the effect of these two common treatment modalities with scar quality as a primary outcome. The aim of this study is, therefore, to compare long-term scar quality after hydrosurgical versus conventional tangential excision in deep dermal burns.

Methods/design

A multicenter, randomized, intra-patient, controlled trial will be conducted in the Dutch burn centers of Rotterdam, Beverwijk, and Groningen. All patients with deep dermal burns that require excision and grafting are eligible. Exclusion criteria are: a burn wound < 50 cm², total body surface area (TBSA) burned > 30%, full-thickness burns, chemical or electrical burns, infected wounds (clinical symptoms in combination with positive wound swabs), insufficient knowledge of the Dutch or English language, patients that are unlikely to comply with requirements of the study protocol and follow-up, and patients who are (temporarily) incompetent because of sedation and/or intubation. A total of 137 patients will be included. Comparable wound areas A and B will be appointed, randomized and either excised conventionally with a knife or with the hydrosurgery system. The primary outcome is scar quality measured by the observer score of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS); a subjective scar-assessment instrument, consisting of two separate six-item scales (observer and patient) that are both scored on a 10-point rating scale.

Discussion

This study will contribute to the optimal surgical treatment of patients with deep dermal burn wounds.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register, NTR6232. Registered on 23 January 2017.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2599-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

New techniques for wound management: A systematic review of their role in the management of chronic wounds

Debridement is a crucial component of wound management. Recent technologies such as hydrosurgery (Versajet), ultrasound therapy (the MIST therapy device), or plasma-mediated bipolar radio-frequency ablation therapy (Coblation) seem to represent interesting alternatives for wound debridement. The purpose of this systematic review was to describe, evaluate, and compare these three recently developed methods for the management of chronic wounds. In January 2016, an electronic database search was conducted of MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Embase for articles concerning these three innovative methods for the management of chronic wounds. A total of 389 references were identified by our search strategy, and 15 articles were included. We extracted data regarding the number and age of patients, indications, operating time, number of procedures, costs, wound healing time, decrease in exudation, perioperative blood loss, bacterial load, and the occurrence of complications. The 15 articles included studies that involved 563 patients who underwent hydrosurgery (7 studies), ultrasound therapy (6 studies), or Coblation (2 studies). Six randomized controlled trials were included that compared the use of a scalpel or curette to hydrosurgery (2 studies) or ultrasound therapy (6 studies). Hydrosurgery, in addition to being a very precise and selective tool, allows significantly faster debridement. Ultrasound therapy provides a significant reduction of exudation, and improves the wound healing time. No comparative study dedicated to Coblation was identified. Despite the obvious clinical interest of the topic, our review of the current literature revealed a lack of prospective randomized studies comparing these devices with each other or with standard techniques, particularly for Coblation and hydrosurgery.

Steel Wool-Aided Dermabrasion of Deep Partial-Thickness Burns

Early tangential excision of the burn wound is essential for removal of necrotic tissue and promotion of burn wound healing process. However, the depth of the burn wound is not easily assessed during the tangential excision performed by hand-held dermatomes, and it may be possible to excise unburned vital dermis unnecessarily, which aids in primary epithelization of the burn wound by adnexal structures. We herein present early clinical results of steel wool-aided dermabrasion in patients with deep partial-thickness burns. This is a retrospective case study of 23 consecutive hospitalized patients with deep partial-thickness burns. All of the steel wool-aided dermabrasions were performed under general anesthesia within 48 hours after injury. Patients were excluded from the study if the admission was not within 24 hours after injury, and if the burn wound was entirely superficial partial- or full-thickness. Thirteen male and 10 female patients with a mean age of 26.2 ± 17.1 years were enrolled in the study. During the follow-up period, all of the patients had burn wounds primary epithelized on postburn day 15.1 ± 1.8, without any complications. None of the patients exhibited a mortal course, and redebridement or skin grafting of the previously dermabraded deep partial-thickness burn wounds were not required in any of the patients. Steel wool-aided dermabrasion is an easy, cost-effective, and reliable technique for the treatment of deep partial-thickness burns, which provides complete removal of necrotic tissue, preserves the vital dermis, reduces the requirement for skin grafting, and decreases length of hospital stay.

Stem cells, niches and scaffolds: Applications to burns and wound care

The importance of skin to survival, and the devastating physical and psychological consequences of scarring following reparative healing of extensive or difficult to heal human wounds, cannot be disputed. We discuss the significant challenges faced by patients and healthcare providers alike in treating these wounds. New state of the art technologies have provided remarkable insights into the role of skin stem and progenitor cells and their niches in maintaining skin homeostasis and in reparative wound healing. Based on this knowledge, we examine different approaches to repair extensive burn injury and chronic wounds, including full and split thickness skin grafts, temporising matrices and scaffolds, and composite cultured skin products. Notable developments include next generation skin substitutes to replace split thickness skin autografts and next generation gene editing coupled with cell therapies to treat genodermatoses. Further refinements are predicted with the advent of bioprinting technologies, and newly defined biomaterials and autologous cell sources that can be engineered to more accurately replicate human skin architecture, function and cosmesis. These advances will undoubtedly improve quality of life for patients with extensive burns and difficult to heal wounds.

Improving mortality outcomes of Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: A regional burns centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Stevens Johnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are rare, potentially fatal desquamative disorders characterised by large areas of partial thickness skin and mucosal loss. The degree of epidermal detachment that occurs has led to SJS/TEN being described as a burn-like condition. These patients benefit from judicious critical care, early debridement and meticulous wound care. This is best undertaken within a multidisciplinary setting led by clinicians experienced in the management of massive skin loss and its sequelae. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes of SJS/TEN overlap & TEN patients managed by our regional burns service over a 12-year period. We present our treatment model for other burn centres treating SJS/TEN patients.

METHODS

A retrospective case review was performed for all patients with a clinical diagnosis of TEN or SJS/TEN overlap admitted to our paediatric and adult burns centre between June 2004 and December 2016. Patient demographics, percentage total body surface area (%TBSA), mucosal involvement, causation, severity of illness score (SCORTEN), length of stay and survival were appraised with appropriate statistical analysis performed using Graph Pad Prism 7.02 Software.

RESULTS

During the study period, 42 patients (M26; F: 16) with TEN (n=32) and SJS/TEN overlap (n=10) were managed within our burns service. Mean %TBSA of cutaneous involvement was 57% (range 10-100%) and mean length of stay (LOS) was 27 days (range 1-144 days). We observed 4 deaths in our series compared to 16 predicted by SCORTEN giving a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 24%.

CONCLUSION

Management in our burns service with an aggressive wound care protocol involving debridement of blistered epidermis and wound closure with synthetic and biological dressings seems to have produced benefits in mortality when compared to predicted outcomes.

Surgical treatment and management of the severely burn patient: Review and update

Since one of the main challenges in treating acute burn injuries is preventing infection, early excising of the eschar and covering of the wound becomes critical. Non-viable tissue is removed by initial aggressive surgical debridement. Many surgical options for covering the wound bed have been described, although split-thickness skin grafts remain the standard for the rapid and permanent closure of full-thickness burns. Significant advances made in the past decades have greatly improved burns patient care, as such that major future improvements in survival rates seem to be more difficult. Research into stem cells, grafting, biomarkers, inflammation control, and rehabilitation will continue to improve individualized care and create new treatment options for these patients.

Necrotising fasciitis of the extremities: implementation of new management technologies

INTRODUCTION

Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is potentially life-threatening soft-tissue infection. Early diagnosis and aggressive surgical debridement are critical to decrease mortality and morbidity. The impacts of new management technologies such as hydro-bisturi-assisted debridement (HAD) and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) are not yet clear with respect to treatment of NF. The objective of this study was to describe laboratory (including LRINEC score), clinical and microbiological factors, treatment methods and outcomes related to managing necrotising fasciitis, focusing on the implementation of new treatment methods in our centre.

METHODS

From June 2010 to June 2014, adult patients diagnosed with necrotising fasciitis affecting an upper or lower limb that were admitted to our hospital, a referral tertiary care centre, were eligible to participate in this study. Demographic data, clinical features, location of infection, Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) score on the day of admission, microbiology and laboratory results, use of HAD, wound management using NPWT, and patient outcomes were retrospectively analysed. A univariate risk factor analysis was performed, in an attempt to define prognostic factors for mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Type II NF (Group A ß-haemolytic streptococci) was found in 8 cases (40%). The average LRINEC score on the day of admission was 6. The lower extremity was affected in 60% of the cases. All patients were treated operatively, with 2.5 interventions on average. Hydro-bisturi was used in the first debridement in 40% of the cases (8 out 20). In 75% of the studied cases, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) was the technique selected for surgical wound management. The global mortality rate was 30%. On univariate analysis, the only factors significantly associated with mortality were high levels of creatinin (p=0.033) and low blood glucose levels (p=0.012). Finally, four amputations were observed in this series.

CONCLUSION

We confirm that necrotising fasciitis (NF) of the extremities, despite new advancements in treatment and critical care management, is still a potentially life-threatening soft-tissue infection (30% mortality). New, advanced wound management modalities have been heavily used in management of necrotising fasciitis, but these have not had significant impacts on morbidity and mortality rates.

Hyperpigmentation after surgery for a deep dermal burn of the dorsum of the hand: partial-thickness debridement followed by medium split-thickness skin grafting vs full-thickness debridement followed by thick split-thickness skin grafting

BACKGROUND

Early excision and skin grafting are commonly used to treat deep dermal burns (DDBs) of the dorsum of the hand. Partial-thickness debridement (PTD) is one of the most commonly used procedures for the excision of burned tissue of the dorsum of the hand. In contrast, full-thickness debridement (FTD) has also been reported. However, it is unclear whether PTD or FTD is better.

METHODS

In this hospital-based retrospective study, we compared the outcomes of PTD followed by a medium split-thickness skin graft (STSG) with FTD followed by a thick STSG to treat a DDB of the dorsum of the hand in Japanese patients. To evaluate postoperative pigmentation of the skin graft, quantitative analyses were performed using the red, green, and blue (RGB) and the hue, saturation, and brightness (HSB) color spaces. We have organized the manuscript in a manner compliant with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

RESULTS

Data from 11 patients were analyzed. Six hands (five patients) received grafts in the PTD group and eight hands (six patients) received grafts in the FTD group. Graft take was significantly better in the FTD group (median 98 %, interquartile range 95-99) than in the PTD group (median 90 %, interquartile range 85-90) (P < 0.01). Quantitative skin color analyses in both the RGB and HSB color spaces showed that postoperative grafted skin was significantly darker than the adjacent control area in the PTD group, but not in the FTD group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a possibility that FTD followed by a thick STSG is an option that can reduce the risk of hyperpigmentation after surgery for DDB of the dorsum of the hand in Japanese patients. Further investigation is needed to clarify whether the FTD or the thick STSG or both are the factor for the control of hyperpigmentation.

An easy, rapid, and reproducible way to create a split-thickness wound for experimental purposes

Partial-thickness wound models of rat skin have some difficulties in creating the wounds in equal size and depth. Moreover, making a split-thickness wound on the rat skin seems not to be simple and rapid. A new alternative method was presented here to overcome these obstacles, by using a waterjet device to create a split-thickness wound on rat skin. Twenty-four male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 3 groups. An area of 4 × 4 cm in diameter was marked on the center of the dorsal skin. Waterjet hydrosurgery system was used to create a wound on the dorsal rat skin, by removing the outer layers of the skin. In group 1, rat skin was wounded with setting 1 to create a superficial skin wound. In group 2, it was injured with setting 5 to make a deeper wound, and in group 3, skin wound was performed with setting 10 making the deepest wound in the experiment. After the wounds were created on the rat skin, a full-thickness skin biopsy was taken from the middle of the cranial margin of the wound, including both the wound surface and the healthy skin in a specimen. Healing time of the wounds of animals was recorded in the experiment groups. Then, the results were compared statistically between the groups. In the histologic assessment, both the thickness of the remnant of the epidermis in the wound surface and the thickness of the healthy epidermis were measured under light microscope. Thickness of the epidermis remaining after wounding was statistically compared among the groups and with the healthy epidermis. The mean thickness of the remaining epidermis was determined for each group. It was higher in the superficial wounds than in the deep wounds, because of the removal of the skin from its outer surface through the deep layers of the skin with waterjet device. The most superficial wound in the experiment was observed in group 1, which was statistically different from the wounds of group 3, whereas there was no difference between the wounds of groups 1 and 2. Compared with the wounds of groups 1 and 2, the wounds in group 3 were significantly deeper than the wounds of other groups, which was statistically significant. In all groups, mean thickness of epidermis in the wound surface showed statistically significant difference from that in the healthy skin. When compared with the healing times of the wounds in the groups, a statistically significant difference was found between them. Creation of a split-skin wound, by using the waterjet system, provides a wound in reproducible size and depth, also in a standardized and rapid manner. Moreover, it makes precise and controlled wound creation in the rat skin.

Recent advances in topical wound care

There are a wide variety of dressing techniques and materials available for management of both acute wounds and chronic non-healing wounds. The primary objective in both the cases is to achieve a healed closed wound. However, in a chronic wound the dressing may be required for preparing the wound bed for further operative procedures such as skin grafting. An ideal dressing material should not only accelerate wound healing but also reduce loss of protein, electrolytes and fluid from the wound, and help to minimize pain and infection. The present dictum is to promote the concept of moist wound healing. This is in sharp contrast to the earlier practice of exposure method of wound management wherein the wound was allowed to dry. It can be quite a challenge for any physician to choose an appropriate dressing material when faced with a wound. Since wound care is undergoing a constant change and new products are being introduced into the market frequently, one needs to keep abreast of their effect on wound healing. This article emphasizes on the importance of assessment of the wound bed, the amount of drainage, depth of damage, presence of infection and location of wound. These characteristics will help any clinician decide on which product to use and where,in order to get optimal wound healing. However, there are no ‘magical dressings’. Dressings are one important aspect that promotes wound healing apart from treating the underlying cause and other supportive measures like nutrition and systemic antibiotics need to be given equal attention.

Contemporary evaluation and management of the diabetic foot

Foot problems in patients with diabetes remain a major public health issue and are the commonest reason for hospitalization of patients with diabetes with prevalence as high as 25%. Ulcers are breaks in the dermal barrier with subsequent erosion of underlying subcutaneous tissue that may extend to muscle and bone, and superimposed infection is a frequent and costly complication. The pathophysiology of diabetic foot disease is multifactorial and includes neuropathy, infection, ischemia, and abnormal foot structure and biomechanics. Early recognition of the etiology of these foot lesions is essential for good functional outcome. Managing the diabetic foot is a complex clinical problem requiring a multidisciplinary collaboration of health care workers to achieve limb salvage. Adequate off-loading, frequent debridement, moist wound care, treatment of infection, and revascularization of ischemic limbs are the mainstays of therapy. Even when properly managed, some of the foot ulcers do not heal and are arrested in a state of chronic inflammation. These wounds can frequently benefit from various adjuvants, such as aggressive debridement, growth factors, bioactive skin equivalents, and negative pressure wound therapy. While these, increasingly expensive, therapies have shown promising results in clinical trials, the results have yet to be translated into widespread clinical practice leaving a huge scope for further research in this field.

[Extensive fibromata pendulantia. Hydrosurgery as a therapy option using the Versajet technique]

Fibromata pendulantia often appear as small filiform skin tags with a narrow pedicle in the neck, axilla and groin areas. Hitherto, extensive fibromata pendulantia were resected either surgically (curette, scissors, scalpel) or by laser. The present case study of an adipose patient with disseminated fibromata pendulantia in the axillary region in the setting of pseudoacanthosis nigricans introduces the Versajet hydrosurgery technique as an alternative method. It is able to remove tissue and rinse the wound simultaneously by means of a high-pressure water jet.

Comparison of bulb syringe, pressurized pulsatile, and hydrosurgery debridement methods for removing bacteria from fracture implants

Surgical-site infection is a common form of noscomial infection that can occur in fractures following internal fixation. Treatment of these infections has traditionally included preserving stable implants via debridement and antibiotic administration while the fracture is healing. Recent evidence indicated that this algorithm results in less-than-optimal rates of fracture union and infection eradication.The premise for this study is that bacterial removal from fracture implants using the Versajet Hydrosurgery System (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) method is better compared with the bulb syringe and pressurized pulsatile lavage methods. Thirty-two stainless steel, 4-hole, nonlocking, 3.5-mm fracture plates were incubated with Staphylococus aureus and divided into 4 groups. Eight plates in each group underwent irrigation with 1 L of saline using a bulb syringe lavage, pressurized pulsatile lavage, or the Versajet Hydrosurgery System method. Eight plates underwent no irrigation method and served as a control group. The residual bacterial loads following irrigation were quantitatively cultured. Each of the experimental groups had significantly reduced levels of bacteria adherent to the plate following irrigation compared with the control group (P=.0002). Furthermore, the Versajet Hydrosurgery System was most the effective at bacterial removal, followed by the pressurized pulsatile and bulb syringe lavage techniques (P=.0002 to P=.0012, respectively).Novel approaches to eradicate bacteria from implants, such as hydrosurgery technology, while maintaining rigid stability of healing fracture, may improve clinical outcomes.

Surgical debridement with VERSAJET: an analysis of bacteria load of the wound bed pre- and post-treatment and skin graft taken. A preliminary pilot study

Surgical debridement, which is used for the removal of necrotic tissue from a wound, is becoming more and more important in the treatment of skin injuries. VERSAJET (VERSAJET™, Versajet Hydrosurgery System, Smith and Nephew, Hull, UK) is one of the techniques used for wound debridement. Medical literature does not present either analytical or comparative data correlating the bacterial load with the VERSAJET treatment. For this reason, we have decided to carry out a study to evaluate the level of bacterial contamination before and after the surgical debridement treatment with VERSAJET and, in connection with this, the correlation between the bacterial load and the successful healing of the skin graft. We took a total of 100 bacteriological swabs, 50 before and 50 from 27 selected patients after the treatment with VERSAJET, with which the wound bed was prepared to receive the skin graft or Integra graft in order to acquire data about the level of bacterial contamination. After analysing all those data we can assume that reducing the bacterial load is not the only variable which the successful healing of the skin graft depends on. In conclusion, there is still many data to analyse and study in order to better understand the qualitative and quantitative presence of bacteria and the success of this future surgical procedure. We remind that the performance of this study was not sponsored by any company.

Hydrosurgery: alternative treatment technique for management of chronic osteomyelitis and septic arthritis of hallucial joint of a juvenile foot

The surgical principles of management of chronic osteomyelitis of metatarsal bone of the foot have remained unchanged, but the debridement tools and level of precision have improved. This study reports the use of the Versajet system to achieve accurate, effective wound debridement during an elective orthopedic surgery in the difficult and confined geometric and anatomical area of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the foot. The patient experienced minimum blood loss and tissue resection during the procedure and healed well without complications.