Management of purpura fulminans skin loss at a regional burns centre: Sixteen-year experience

INTRODUCTION

Purpura fulminans (PF) is a rare syndrome of cutaneous purpura which is the consequence of severe circulatory shock causing intravascular thrombosis, haemorrhagic necrosis, and consequent tissue loss. The aim of this study was to present our 16-year experience of managing PF in a regional burns centre.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre retrospective case series of all patients admitted to the St Andrews Burns Centre at Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, Essex, UK, between June 2006 and July 2022 with a diagnosis of PF. Data were extracted by retrospectively searching hospital case notes.

RESULTS

Thirteen individuals were identified [five children (mean age 5, range 1-14) and eight adults (mean age 39, range 24-54)]. The total body surface area of cutaneous necrosis ranged from 5% to 80%, with a mean of 27.2%. Patients were treated with an established surgical sequence of total wound debridement and immediate coverage with a cadaveric allograft, followed by staged wound autografting. The mean time from disease onset to wound autografting was 37.3 days (range 20-64 days). Eight individuals (61.6%) required major amputation of at least one limb (proximal to the ankle or wrist joint). Only one mortality (of 80% total body surface area skin loss) was observed in the identified cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The large body surface areas often involved in PF cases make management of these wounds well suited for burns centres, wherein established facilities and multidisciplinary teams exist that are familiar with managing large cutaneous burns. We provide a suggested algorithm to aid the management of PF.

Improving mortality outcomes of Stevens Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: A regional burns centre experience. Burns. 2018;44:603-611. [PMID: 29029855 DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2017.09.015]

INTRODUCTION

Stevens Johnson Syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are rare, potentially fatal desquamative disorders characterised by large areas of partial thickness skin and mucosal loss. The degree of epidermal detachment that occurs has led to SJS/TEN being described as a burn-like condition. These patients benefit from judicious critical care, early debridement and meticulous wound care. This is best undertaken within a multidisciplinary setting led by clinicians experienced in the management of massive skin loss and its sequelae. In this study, we examined the clinical outcomes of SJS/TEN overlap & TEN patients managed by our regional burns service over a 12-year period. We present our treatment model for other burn centres treating SJS/TEN patients.

METHODS

A retrospective case review was performed for all patients with a clinical diagnosis of TEN or SJS/TEN overlap admitted to our paediatric and adult burns centre between June 2004 and December 2016. Patient demographics, percentage total body surface area (%TBSA), mucosal involvement, causation, severity of illness score (SCORTEN), length of stay and survival were appraised with appropriate statistical analysis performed using Graph Pad Prism 7.02 Software.

RESULTS

During the study period, 42 patients (M26; F: 16) with TEN (n=32) and SJS/TEN overlap (n=10) were managed within our burns service. Mean %TBSA of cutaneous involvement was 57% (range 10-100%) and mean length of stay (LOS) was 27 days (range 1-144 days). We observed 4 deaths in our series compared to 16 predicted by SCORTEN giving a standardised mortality ratio (SMR) of 24%.

CONCLUSION

Management in our burns service with an aggressive wound care protocol involving debridement of blistered epidermis and wound closure with synthetic and biological dressings seems to have produced benefits in mortality when compared to predicted outcomes.

The impact of major trauma network triage systems on patients with major burns

INTRODUCTION

Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Patients presenting with severe trauma and burns benefit from specifically trained multidisciplinary teams. Regional trauma systems have shown improved outcomes for trauma patients. The aim of this study is to determine whether the development of major trauma systems have improved the management of patients with major burns.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed over a four-year period reviewing all major burns in adults and children received at a regional burns centre in the UK before and after the implementation of the regional trauma systems and major trauma centres (MTC). Comparisons were drawn between three areas: (1) Patients presenting before the introduction of MTC and after the introduction of MTC. (2) Patients referred from MTC and non-MTC within the region, following the introduction of MTC. (3) Patients referred using the urban trauma protocol and the rural trauma protocol.

RESULTS

Following the introduction of regional trauma systems and major trauma centres (MTC), isolated burn patients seen at our regional burns centre did not show any significant improvement in transfer times, admission resuscitation parameters, organ dysfunction or survival when referred from a MTC compared to a non-MTC emergency department. There was also no significant difference in survival when comparing referrals from all hospitals pre and post establishment of the major trauma network.

CONCLUSION

No significant outcome benefit was demonstrated for burns patients referred via MTCs compared to non-MTCs. We suggest further research is needed to ascertain whether burns patients benefit from prolonged transfer times to a MTC compared to those seen at their local hospitals prior to transfer to a regional burns unit for further specialist care.