Treatment of metastatic disease of the tibia

3D-printed modular prostheses for reconstruction of intercalary bone defects after joint-sparing limb salvage surgery for femoral diaphyseal tumours

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of 3D-printed modular prostheses in patients who underwent joint-sparing limb salvage surgery (JSLSS) for malignant femoral diaphyseal bone tumours.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients (13 males and four females) with femoral diaphyseal tumours who underwent JSLSS in our hospital.

Results

In all, 17 patients with locally aggressive bone tumours (Enneking stage IIB) located in the femoral shaft underwent JSLSS and reconstruction with 3D-printed modular prostheses between January 2020 and June 2022. The median surgical time was 153 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 117 to 248), and the median estimated blood loss was 200ml (IQR 125 to 400). Osteosarcoma was the most common pathological type (n = 12; 70.6%). The mean osteotomy length was 197.53 mm (SD 12.34), and the median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 19 to 38). Two patients experienced local recurrence and three developed distant metastases. Postoperative complications included wound infection in one patient and screw loosening in another, both of which were treated successfully with revision surgery. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score at the final follow-up was 28 (IQR 27 to 28).

Conclusion

The 3D-printed modular prosthesis is a reliable and feasible reconstruction option for patients with malignant femoral diaphyseal tumours. It helps to improve the limb salvage rate, restore limb function, and achieve better short-term effectiveness.

Longitudinal survival trends of patients with cancer with surgically managed appendicular metastatic bone disease: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Advances in systemic cancer therapies have improved survival for patients with metastatic carcinoma; however, it is unknown whether these advances have translated to improved survival for patients with appendicular metastatic bone disease (A-MBD) after orthopedic interventions. We conducted a study to evaluate the trend in overall survival for patients who underwent orthopedic surgery for A-MBD between 1968 and 2018.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase and Medline to identify studies published since 1968 evaluating patients treated with orthopedic surgery for A-MBD was conducted for a previously published scoping review. We used a meta-regression model to assess the longitudinal trends in 1-, 2- and 5-year overall survival between 1968 and 2018. The midpoint year of patient inclusion for each study was used for analysis. We categorized primary tumour types into a tumour severity score according to prognosis for a further meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 5747 studies identified, 103 were retained for analysis. Meta-regression analysis showed no significant effect of midpoint study year on survival across all time points. There was no effect of the weighted average of tumour severity scores for each study on 1-year survival over time.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant improvement in overall survival between 1968 and 2018 for patients with A-MBD who underwent orthopedic surgery. Orthopedic intervention remains a poor prognostic variable for patients with MBD. This finding highlights the need for improved collection of prospective data in this population to identify patients with favourable survival outcomes who may benefit from personalized oncologic surgical interventions.

Internal fixation versus endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur for metastatic bone disease: Single institutional outcomes

PURPOSE

This study compared internal fixation (IF) to proximal femur replacement (PFR) for proximal femoral metastasis.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2019, 113 lesions underwent IF (n = 94) or PFR (n = 19). Revision risk was calculated with mortality as a competing event.

RESULTS

The 5-year revision risk after IF was 17.6% (95% CI, 9.8%-27.3%) compared to 7.6% (95% CI, 0.3%-28.9%) after PFR (p = 0.59). PFR had longer operative times (p < 0.001), hospital stay (p = 0.039), and higher blood loss (p < 0.001) than IF, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IF may be considered for patients with poor health and a limited prognosis given the less-invasive procedure and shorter hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III. Retrospective Study.

Surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease of the distal extremities

Metastatic bone disease of the distal extremities, also known as acrometastasis, is very rare. Thus, there is very limited information regarding the clinical manifestations and methods of surgical treatment. The current available literature shows that acrometastases are often encountered in the context of advanced disease and are thus associated with poor patient survival. As metastatic bone disease is generally uncurable, the goal of surgical treatment is to provide the patient with good function with as few complications as possible. In this article, we discuss the clinical manifestation of acrometastases, the methods of surgical intervention, and the expected clinical outcome. Non-surgically managed pathological fractures generally remain ununited; therefore, conservative treatment is reserved for patients with poor general condition or dismal prognosis. The current evidence suggests that in lesions of the lower arm and leg, osteosynthesis (plate and screw fixation or intramedullary nail) is the most common method of reconstruction, whereas local excision or amputation are more commonly used in cases of more distal lesions (such as ankle, foot and hand). Following surgery most patients receive adjuvant radiotherapy, even though its role is poorly documented. Close collaboration between orthopedic surgeons and medical oncologists is necessary to improve patient care and treatment outcome. Further studies are needed in order to provide stronger clinical evidence and improve decision-making, in an effort to optimize the patients’ quality of life and avoid the need for revision surgery.

Intercalary Reconstruction of the "Ultra-Critical Sized Bone Defect" by 3D-Printed Porous Prosthesis After Resection of Tibial Malignant Tumor

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the early stability, limb function, and mechanical complications of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following intercalary tibial tumor resections.

Methods

This study defined an "ultra-critical sized bone defect" in the tibia when the length of segmental defect in the tibia was >15.0 cm or >60% of the full tibia and the length of the residual fragment in proximal or distal tibia was between 0.5 cm and 4.0 cm. Thus, five patients with "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following an intercalary tibial malignant tumor resection treated with 3D-printed porous prosthesis between June 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient information, implants design and fabrication, surgical procedures, and early clinical outcome data were collected and evaluated.

Results

Among the five patients, three were male and two were female, with an average age of 30.2 years. Pathological diagnoses were two osteosarcomas, one Ewing sarcoma, one pseudo-myogenic hemangioendothelioma, and one undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma . The average length of the bone defects following tumor resection was 22.8cm, and the average length of ultra-short residual bone was 2.65cm (range=0.6cm-3.8cm). The mean follow-up time was 27.6 months (range=14.0-62.0 months). Early biological fixation was achieved in all five patients. The average time of clinical osseointegration at the bone-porous interface was 3.2 months. All patients were reported to be pain free and have no limitations in their walking distance. No prosthetic mechanical complications were observed.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the "ultra-critical sized bone defect" after an intercalary tibial tumor resection using 3D-printed porous prosthesis achieved satisfactory overall early biological fixation and limb function. Excellent primary stability and the following rigid biological fixation were key factors for success. The outcomes of this study were supposed to support further clinical application and evaluation of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" in the tibia.

Early Improvement in Pain and Functional Outcome but Not Quality of Life After Surgery for Metastatic Long Bone Disease

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases represent the most frequent cause of cancer-related pain, affecting health-related quality of life and creating a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Although most bony metastatic lesions can be managed nonoperatively, surgical management can help patients reduce severe pain, avoid impending fracture, and stabilize pathologic fractures. Studies have demonstrated functional improvement postoperatively as early as 6 weeks, but little data exist on the temporal progress of these improvements or on the changes in quality of life over time as a result of surgical intervention.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do patients' functional outcomes, pain, and quality of life improve after surgery for long bone metastases? (2) What is the temporal progress of these changes to 1 year after surgery or death? (3) What is the overall and 30-day rate of complications after surgery for long bone metastases? (4) What are the oncologic outcomes including overall survival and local disease recurrence for this patient population?

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective study from three orthopaedic oncology centers in Quebec, Canada, was conducted between 2008 and 2016 to examine the improvement in function and quality of life after surgery for patients with long bone metastases. During this time, 184 patients out of a total of 210 patients evaluated during this period were enrolled; of those, 141 (77%) had complete followup at a minimum of 2 weeks (mean, 23 weeks; range, 2-52 weeks) or until death, whereas another 35 (19%) were lost to followup but were not known to have died before the minimum followup interval was achieved. Pathologic fracture was present in 34% (48 of 141) of patients. The median Mirel's score for those who underwent prophylactic surgery was 10 (interquartile range, 10-11). Surgical procedures included intramedullary nailing (55), endoprosthetic replacement (49), plate osteosynthesis (31), extended intralesional curettage (four), and allograft reconstruction (two). Seventy-seven percent (108 of 141) of patients received radiotherapy. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) form, and Quality Of Life During Serious Illness (QOLLTI-P) form were administered pre- and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. Analysis of variance followed by post hoc analysis was conducted to test for significance between pre- and postoperative scores. The Kaplan-Meier estimate was used to calculate overall survivorship and local recurrence-free survival. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

MSTS and BPI pain scores improved at 2 weeks when compared with preoperative scores (MSTS: 39% ± 24% pre- versus 62% ± 19% postoperative, mean difference [MD] 23, 95% confidence interval [CI], 16-32, p < 0.001; BPI: 52% ± 21% pre- versus 30% ± 21% postoperative, MD 22, 95% CI, 16-32, p < 0.001). Continuous and incremental improvement in TESS, MSTS, and BPI scores was observed temporally at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year; for example, the TESS score improved from 44% ± 24% to 73% ± 21% (MD 29, p < 0.001, 95% CI, 19-38) at 6 months. We did not detect a difference in quality of life as measured by the QOLLTI-P score (6 ± 1 pre- versus 7 ± 4 postoperative, MD 1, 95% CI, -0.4 to 3, p = 0.2). The overall and 30-day rates of systemic complications were 35% (49 of 141) and 14% (20 of 141), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 70% (95% CI, 62.4-78) at 6 months and 41% (95% CI, 33-49) at 1 year. Local recurrence-free survival was 17 weeks (95% CI, 11-24).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of metastatic long bone disease substantially improves patients' functional outcome and pain as early as 2 weeks postoperatively and should be considered for impending or pathologic fracture in patients whose survival is expected to be longer than 2 weeks provided that there are no immediate contraindications. Quality of life in this patient population did not improve, which may be a function of patient selection, concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimens, disease progression, or terminal illness, and this merits further investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Modular tumor endoprostheses in surgical palliation of long-bone metastases: a reduction in tumor burden and a durable reconstruction

Background

Surgical treatment of bone metastases has become increasingly important as patients live longer with metastatic cancer and one of the main aims is a long-lasting reconstruction which survives the patient. Conventional osteosynthesis may not be able to achieve this objective in the context of modern day cancer care.

Methods

This study evaluates the oncological outcomes, treatment-related complications, and function after resection of metastases and reconstruction with modular tumor endoprostheses in 80 patients. All patients who underwent surgical treatment with modular tumor prostheses for bone metastases from 1993 to 2008 were traced by our tumor database and clinical information was recorded from patient case.

Results

Mean age was 63 years. The most common primary tumors were renal cell (47%), breast (21%), and lung (8%). The proximal femur was affected in 45%, proximal humerus in 26%, and the distal femur in 17% of cases. In 22 cases, the tumor prosthesis was implanted during a revision operation. Mean overall survival after surgery was 2.9 years. Overall survival rate was 70% at one year and 20% at five years. Implant survival was 83% after one year and 74% at five years. Overall rate of operative revision was 18%.

Conclusions

Our data collectively suggest that despite higher costs, implantation of modular tumor endoprostheses may be a suitable treatment for bone metastases with a low complication rate and rapid improvement in function in appropriately selected patients.