Case reports: Shoulder arthroplasty in transplant recipients: a report of five cases

Hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty in patients with a history of solid organ transplant: A review

Solid organ transplants (SOT) have evolved into life-saving interventions for end-stage diseases affecting vital organs. Advances in transplantation techniques, donor selection, and immunosuppressive therapies have enhanced outcomes, leading to a growing demand for SOT. Patients with a solid organ transplant are living long enough to develop the same pathologies which are indicated for joint replacement surgery in the general population. SOT patients who undergo a total hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty do similarly in the context of clinical outcomes and implant survival when compared to the general population. These immunosuppressed patients tend to have higher complication rates in the short-term following surgery. Prudent management of these patients in the short-term may be necessary, but patients can expect to do well otherwise.

Shoulder arthroplasty following solid organ transplant: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to report a systematic review and meta-analysis of solid organ transplant (SOT) patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty to compare functional and radiographic outcomes, demographics, and complications with non-transplant patients.

Methods

Studies were included if they examined patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of prior solid organ transplantation and included post operative range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, complications, or revisions. Studies were excluded if they were national database analyses or lacked clinical data. Pubmed, MEDLine, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried using relevant search terms in July 2022. Data was pooled, weighted, and a paired t-test and chi-square analysis was performed.

Results

There were 71 SOT and 159 non-SOT shoulders included in the study. The most common indication for surgery was avascular necrosis (n = 26) in the solid organ transplant group and osteoarthritis (n = 60) in the non-SOT group. Forward elevation, external rotation, ASES, and VAS pain scores improved significantly in both cohorts following surgery. There was no significant difference in age at surgery (p-value = 0.20), postoperative forward elevation (p-value = 0.08), postoperative external rotation (0.84), and postoperative ASES scores (p-value = 0.11) between the two cohorts. VAS pain scores were significantly lower in the SOT cohort (p-value<0.01). The risk of death was significantly higher in the SOT group (p-value<0.01). but the rate of overall complications (p = 0.47), surgical complication (p-value = 0.79), or revision surgery (p-value = 1.00) was not significantly different between the two cohorts.

Conclusion

Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe, effective option in patients following solid organ transplant. There is not an increased risk of adverse outcomes, and SOT patients had comparable range of motion and patient-reported outcomes when compared to their non-SOT peers.

Level of evidence

III.

Safety of shoulder arthroplasty in lung transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Although shoulder arthroplasty is relatively safe in general population, it remains unclear in transplant recipient. Aim of this study was to determine outcomes and morbidity after shoulder arthroplasty in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at our university hospital center from 2001 to 2015. Main inclusion criterion was all lung transplant recipient who underwent shoulder arthroplasty. Clinical outcomes including Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) were determined in pre-operative period and a minimum follow-up of 36 months. Special attention was taken about complications.

RESULTS

Among 700 lung transplant recipients, we identified 12 patients who underwent 14 shoulder arthroplasties. Arthroplasties were performed after proximal humeral avascular necrosis (n = 10), degenerative osteoarthritis (n = 1) and non-union of proximal humeral fracture (n = 1). 8 anatomical total shoulder arthroplasties and 6 reversed shoulder arthroplasties were performed. Mean follow-up was 61.4 months (± 22.1). Mean age was 47.1 (± 9.3) years. All patients had immunosuppression therapy at the time of surgery. Mean Constant score was improved at last follow-up [43(± 9.7) vs 94(± 4), p < 0.001]. VAS decreased from 6.4 (± 1.2) to 0.4 (± 0.8), p < 0.001. Mean ASES was improved from 33 (± 6) to 91 (± 5) at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Range of motion were improved between early post-operative evaluation and last follow-up: forward flexion: 85° (± 8°) vs 119°(± 13°); abduction: 83° (± 14°) vs 106°(± 23°); external rotation (RE1): 26° (± 7°) vs 36°(± 10°). At last follow-up, one revision was required for humeral prothesis loosening at 2 years post-surgery. One patient died due to acute pulmonary decompensation on chronic rejection 66 months after shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe procedure in this vulnerable population of lung transplant recipients. Such results encourage us to continue arthroplasty surgery when required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Shoulder arthroplasty in solid organ transplant patients: a retrospective, match paired analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have evaluated total hip and knee arthroplasty in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients; however, there are limited studies evaluating shoulder arthroplasty in SOT patients. This study compares the complications and functional outcomes of SOT patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with a matched control group.

METHODS

The institution's database was retrospectively reviewed for patients with a history of SOT undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty (with minimum 2-year follow-up) and compared with a control group matched for age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical procedure. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and outcome scores, perioperative surgical and medical complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with previous SOT underwent 19 shoulder arthroplasties. Thirty-four underwent 35 shoulder arthroplasties in the control group. At last follow-up, the SOT group had a significantly worse UCLA score. The SOT group had a significantly worse improvement in UCLA, active elevation, and passive elevation scores in pre- to postoperative scores. There was no difference in length of stay, infection, or surgical complications. Ninety-day readmissions, medically related complications, and required blood transfusion were significantly higher in the SOT group. There was increased mortality in the SOT compared with the control group (death occurred on average 1577 days after arthroplasty).

CONCLUSION

Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with previous SOT appears safe and effective for degenerative shoulder disorders. Patients should be counseled preoperatively that their range of motion and function may not improve as much as their nontransplant cohorts. SOT patients may have increased incidence of postoperative blood transfusions and medically related complications.

Shoulder arthroplasty in patients with immunosuppression following solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to determine the risk and outcomes of primary shoulder arthroplasties in patients with immunosuppression who had undergone solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

Using a single institution's total joint registry, we reviewed 30 primary shoulder arthroplasties in 25 post-transplantation patients, including 12 total shoulder arthroplasties, 10 hemiarthroplasties, and 8 reverse shoulder arthroplasties, between 1985 and 2012. Therapy and patient variables were recorded, including immunosuppressive therapy protocols, the date of preceding solid organ transplantation, and specific medications taken in the perioperative period. We matched a cohort of control patients for age, sex, type of implant, and year of surgery at a ratio of 4:1. Two groups were compared regarding mortality risk, complications, and clinical outcomes (pain score, range of motion, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score).

RESULTS

No periprosthetic infections occurred in the post-transplantation group at a mean follow-up of 39 months. However, the post-transplantation group showed an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures compared with the control group (hazard ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-70.98; P = .03). Despite the increase in fractures, the overall number of complications did not differ between the groups. Furthermore, postoperative shoulder function and outcome scores were not significantly different between patients who had a prior transplant and those who did not.

CONCLUSION

Primary shoulder arthroplasty in patients with immunosuppression who underwent solid organ transplantation is a successful procedure to treat glenohumeral arthritis. In contrast, there may be an increased risk of periprosthetic fractures in patients with a history of a solid organ transplant.

The impact of solid organ transplant history on inpatient complications, mortality, length of stay, and cost for primary total shoulder arthroplasty admissions in the United States

BACKGROUND

There is a growing population of patients with history of solid organ transplant (SOT) surgery among total joint patients. Patients with history of SOT have been found to have longer lengths of stay and higher inpatient hospital costs and complications rates after hip and knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this is true for shoulder arthroplasty in SOT patients.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried to describe relative demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics, perioperative complications, length of stay, and total costs for patients with a history of SOT (International Classification of Diseases-9th Edition-Clinical Modificiation V42.0, V42.1, V42.7, V42.83) undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (81.80, 81.88) from 2004 to 2014.

RESULTS

A weighted total of 843 patients (unweighted frequency = 171) and 382,773 patients (unweighted frequency = 77,534) with and without history of SOT, respectively, underwent shoulder arthroplasty. SOT patients were more often younger and more likely to be male, have Medicare, and undergo surgery in a large teaching institution in the Midwest or Northeast (P < .001). SOT patients had higher or similar comorbid disease prevalence for 27 of 29 Elixhauser comorbidities. The risk of any complication was significantly higher among SOT patients (15.5% vs. 9.3%, P = .007). SOT patients experienced inpatient admissions an average 0.27 days longer (P < .001) and $1103 more costly (P = .06) than non-SOT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with history of SOT undergoing shoulder arthroplasty appear to remain a unique population due to their specific vulnerability to minor complications and inherently increased inpatient resource utilization.

Solid organ transplant patients experience high rates of infection and other complications after total knee arthroplasty

Survival after solid organ transplants in the United States is increasing, and there is a need to understand the complications in knee arthroplasty patients who underwent organ transplantation. A retrospective study was conducted from 1993-2008 on 19 patients (23 knee arthroplasties) with previous successful solid organ transplants. Eleven knee arthroplasties were performed after renal transplantation, and 12 after nonrenal solid organ transplant (seven liver, four heart, one lung). Complications occurred in 9/23 patients (39.1%) and infections occurred in 4/23 patients (17.3%). Of the infected knees, two had MRSA, one had MSSA, and one Escherichia coli. Noninfectious complications (5/24, 21.7%) include aseptic loosening, quadriceps rupture, femoral fracture, hemarthrosis, and arthrofibrosis. All patients with complications were on immunosuppressant medications at the time of arthroplasty. There was a significantly higher rate of infection in the renal group compared to the non-renal group (P = 0.022). There was also a higher overall complication rate in the renal group however this did not reach significance.

Joint Arthroplasties other than the Hip in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Transplantation Surgery has undergone a great development during the last thirty years and the survival of solid organ recipients has increased dramatically. Osteo-articular diseases such as osteoporosis, fractures, avascular bone necrosis and osteoarthritis are relatively common in these patients and joint arthroplasty may be required. The outcome of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head after renal transplantation has been studied and documented by many researchers. However, the results of joint arthroplasties other than the hip in solid organs recipients were only infrequently reported in the literature. A systematic review of the English literature was conducted in order to investigate the outcome of joint arthroplasties other than the hip in kidney, liver or heart transplant recipients. Nine pertinent articles including 51 knee arthroplasties, 8 shoulder arthroplasties and 1 ankle arthroplasty were found. These articles reported well to excellent results with a complication rate and spectrum comparable with those reported in nontransplant patients.

Intramedullary reaming for press-fit fixation of a humeral component removes cortical bone asymmetrically

Periprosthetic humeral fractures are major complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Bone removal during surgical reaming is a risk factor for these fractures. Although it is recognized that the endosteal surface of the humerus is asymmetrical whereas the reamers are symmetrical, to our knowledge, the effect of cylindrical reaming on the pattern of cortical bone removal during reaming has not been previously studied. The medullary canals of 10 cadaveric humeri (mean age, 73 years) were reamed in a manner similar to that used during humeral arthroplasty. Cortical dimensions were obtained from computed tomography scans before and after reaming. In unreamed humeri, the anterior-posterior endocortical diameter was 20% smaller than the medial-lateral diameter. The average medial-lateral diameter (15.6 +/- 2.3 mm) was significantly greater than the anterior-posterior diameter (12.5 +/- 1.9 mm) at 13 cm distal to the tuberosity (P < .00005). Successive cylindrical reaming preferentially thinned the anterior and posterior cortices. This bone loss would not be apparent on anterior-posterior radiographs. Intramedullary reaming to obtain substantial cortical contact asymmetrically removes cortical bone in a manner that may increase the risk of periprosthetic fracture.